are you up to the tusk? identifying ivory species using raman … · 2017. 8. 3. · introduction...

1
Introduction Analytical chemistry research is needed to improve techniques for identifying ivory, a protruding tooth, by origin and species while minimizing sample size. Poaching of African elephants (Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis) and Asian elephants ( Elephas maximus) is an issue that ultimately threatens their survival; this makes identifying the origin of elephant ivory even more important not only for addressing poaching and ivory trading, but also for assisting museums overseeing ivory artifacts. 1 To combat elephant poaching, enforcement of African elephant ivory trade regulations under CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) has intensified. 1 These regulations greatly impact the movement of museum exhibitions, requiring staff to identify the ivory’s originating species. 1 While species identification is important for legal documentation, determining the origin of ivory artifacts is crucial for historical, curatorial, and art conservation purposes to achieve a better understanding of its unique context. Culturally significant ivory artifacts pose an additional challenge, as it is imperative to use minimally invasive sampling techniques. Bone and antler have a similar composition to ivory, and were included in this study as model systems due to greater availability. 2 This study uses Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization - Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, and Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) to differentiate between various species using bone, antler, and ivory. ICP-MS ICP-MS is used to identify trace elements such as transition metals that are present within an aqueous sample. Applied to ivory, this reflects the various minerals present in the species’ environments. 8 MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry targets large molecules such as peptides. MALDI enables us to measure the masses of the peptides produced by breaking down the collagen protein found in ivory using trypsin, a common protease. These masses are used to identify specific markers found in various mammals. 9 Though this is a destructive technique, it requires minimal sample size compared to other techniques. Raman This form of spectroscopy allows one to characterize both organic and inorganic components within a sample by detecting changes in polarizability. Previous literature has shown the ability to characterize ivory by comparing peak intensity ratios between the organic ν(CH) peaks in collagen and inorganic ν(PO) peaks in hydroxyapatite. 6 Conclusion Within elemental analysis of ICP based on trends noticed in African and Asian elephants, there were some notable differences between the elephant ivory samples. In order to verify significant differences in the concentrations of particular elements, further research would need to be performed with other ivory samples. The same elements were analyzed within elk tooth samples and it should be noted that the elements are not specific to North America. From the analysis using MALDI it can be concluded that mammalian species can be differentiated through ivory samples. Through the markers compiled by Dr. Daniel Kirby, it was confirmed that the samples analyzed were elephant and elk. Due to the mammoth sample being fossilized, the low proportion of remaining collagen made the spectra inconclusive. This confirms that peptide analysis techniques are not suitable for fossilized samples. There were also inconclusive differences noted between African and Asian elephants. Further analysis of spectra and perhaps looking at different makers would possibly prove to be useful. Through the use of Raman spectroscopy, it could be verified that the hydroxyapatite ν(PO) and collagen ν(CH) peaks could be seen throughout the elephant ivory samples. These same peaks are not strongly apparent in bone, fossilized mammoth ivory, or elk tooth samples. Most of the data taken showed a low signal-to-noise ratio due to the fluorescence of each sample. Completely photobleaching the samples prior to spectral collection would resolve this error in future studies . ARE YOU UP TO THE TUSK? IDENTIFYING IVORY SPECIES USING ARE YOU UP TO THE TUSK? IDENTIFYING IVORY SPECIES USING RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY AND MASS SPECTROMETRY Chloe Cao 1 , Hope La Farge 2 , Adam Ring 3 , Terry Drayman-Weisser 4 , Daniel Walter Rowlands 2 1 Johns Hopkins University; 2 University of Maryland, Baltimore County; 3 Emory University; 4 The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore Sample Preparation 1. Optimize sampling using a Dremel stylus to create powder and cross section samples. 2. Prepare samples accordingly for each of the three techniques. Raman Spectroscopy MALDI ICP-MS 3. Conduct analysis using bone and antler samples to optimize parameters. 4. Apply optimized procedures to ivory samples. Sample Cet1 (A) (B) (C) Cet2 (D) (F) (G) 40.1 1105.7 nd nd 1580.2 nd nd 2854.4 nd 40.2 1105.7 1251.9 1453.9 1580.1 1541 2116.4 2853.8 3015.9 41a.1 1105.9 nd 1454.1 1580.2 1541.2 2116.7 2853.9 3015 41b.1 #1 1105.7 1251 1453.9 1579 1540 2116.4 2853 3015 41b.1 #2 1105.9 nd 1454.2 nd 1541.2 2115.8 2854.8 nd 41b.2 1105.7 nd 1453.9 1579 1540 2116.4 2853 3015 59.1 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1580.2 1541.2 2116.7 2854.5 nd 59.2 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1579 1541.2 2116.7 2854.5 nd ET.1 1105.8 nd 1427.9 nd n/a 2132.4 2885.6 3033 ET.2 1106 1197.1 1428.3 1551.4 n/a 2131.9 2884.4 nd MT.1 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd P.1 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1580.3 1541.2 2116.8 nd nd P.2 1106.1 nd 1454.4 nd nd nd nd nd Sample ν(PO) cm -1 I(PO) ν(CH) cm -1-1 I(CH) Ratio I(CH) / I(PO) Elephant Ivory 40 932.48 40674.11 2931.13 58957.17 1.469 Elephant Ivory 41a 932.48 27826.76 2918.64 41132.10 1.585 Elephant Ivory 41b 932.48 27237.02 2918.64 42498.24 1.653 Elephant Ivory 59 932.48 22266.91 2918.64 28361.06 1.309 Beef Bone 4 932.48 14259.06 2918.64 18285.85 1.087 Elk Tooth ET.1 932.48 18186.04 2918.64 23079.17 1.251 Minoan Snake Goddess, gold and likely elephant ivory 16 th century BCE (Late Minoan) The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore 71.1090 “Pokal” with Royal Portraits, mammoth ivory 2 nd half of 18 th century (Russian) The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore 71.477 Eu 153 Sr 88 Mn 55 Ba 137 Ba 138 Ni 58 Ni 60 Mo 92 Mo 95 Mo 96 Mo 98 Zn 64 Zn 66 Zn 68 40.1 40.2 41a.1 41b.1 41b.2 59.1 59.2 ET.1 ET.2 MT.1 P1 References 1. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Ed.; In Research Project on the Determination of Age and the Geographical Origin of African Elephant Ivory; 2013; , pp 11. 2. Espinoza, E.; Mann, M., Eds.; In Identification Guide for Ivory and Ivory Substitutes; World Wildlife Fund: 1992; p 35. 3. Bruker Instructions for Use Peptide Calibration Standard. 2016. 4. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D. Ivory and simulated ivory artefacts: Fourier transform Raman diagnostic study. 1995. 5. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D.; Holder, J.; Lawson, E. Fourier-transform Raman spectra of ivory III: identification of mammalian specimens. 1997. 6. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D.; Holder, J.; Lawson, E. Fourier-transform Raman spectroscopy of ivory: II. Spectroscopic analysis and assignments. 1997. 7. Shimadzu Principles of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. http://www.shimadzu.com/an/lifescience/maldi/princpl1.html. 8. Singh, R.; Goyal, S.; Khanna, P.; Mukherjee, P.; Sukumar, R. Using morphometric and analytical techniques to characterize elephant ivory. 2006. 9. The Maiman Institute for Proteome Research Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI). https://www.tau.ac.il/lifesci/units/proteomics/voyager.html 2017. Acknowledgements This project was supported by the Baltimore SCIART research program funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The students in this program would like to acknowledge Dr. Zeev Rosenzweig (SCIART program director at UMBC), Dr. Daniel Kirby, Dr. Bradley Arnold (UMBC), Joshua Wilhide (MCAC at UMBC), Ian Schaffer (MCAC at UMBC), Dr. Phil Mortimer (JHU), and Dr. Laszlo Takacs (UMBC). Additionally, we acknowledge The Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, the Fasching family, Richard Brown, Dr. Chia-Hua Lue, Dr. Bradley Arnold, and Stacy Davis for donating samples to this study. nd = non-detectable, n/a = non-applicable ET = elk tooth, MT = mammoth tusk, P = powdered elephant ivory Blue = high intensity peaks in reference to standard

Upload: others

Post on 06-Dec-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Are you up to the tusk? Identifying ivory species using Raman … · 2017. 8. 3. · Introduction Analytical chemistry research is needed to improve techniques for identifying ivory,

IntroductionAnalytical chemistry research is needed to improve techniquesfor identifying ivory, a protruding tooth, by origin and specieswhile minimizing sample size. Poaching of African elephants(Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis) and Asianelephants (Elephas maximus) is an issue that ultimatelythreatens their survival; this makes identifying the origin ofelephant ivory even more important not only for addressingpoaching and ivory trading, but also for assisting museumsoverseeing ivory artifacts.1

To combat elephant poaching, enforcement of Africanelephant ivory trade regulations under CITES (Convention onInternational Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna andFlora) has intensified.1 These regulations greatly impact themovement of museum exhibitions, requiring staff to identifythe ivory’s originating species.1 While species identification isimportant for legal documentation, determining the origin ofivory artifacts is crucial for historical, curatorial, and artconservation purposes to achieve a better understanding of itsunique context. Culturally significant ivory artifacts pose anadditional challenge, as it is imperative to use minimallyinvasive sampling techniques.

Bone and antler have a similar composition to ivory, and wereincluded in this study as model systems due to greateravailability.2 Th is s tudy uses Matr ix Ass is ted LaserDesorption/Ionization - Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) massspectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, and Inductively CoupledPlasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) to differentiate betweenvarious species using bone, antler, and ivory.

ICP-MSICP-MS is used to identify trace elements such as transitionmetals that are present within an aqueous sample. Applied toivory, this reflects the various minerals present in the species’environments.8

MALDI-TOFMALDI-TOF mass spectrometry targets large molecules suchas peptides. MALDI enables us to measure the masses of thepeptides produced by breaking down the collagen proteinfound in ivory using trypsin, a common protease. Thesemasses are used to identify specific markers found in variousmammals.9 Though this is a destructive technique, it requiresminimal sample size compared to other techniques.

Raman This form of spectroscopy allows one to characterize bothorganic and inorganic components within a sample bydetecting changes in polarizability. Previous literature hasshown the ability to characterize ivory by comparing peakintensity ratios between the organic ν(CH) peaks in collagenand inorganic ν(PO) peaks in hydroxyapatite.6

ConclusionWithin elemental analysis of ICP based on trends noticed inAfrican and Asian elephants, there were some notabledifferences between the elephant ivory samples. In order toverify significant differences in the concentrations of particularelements, further research would need to be performed withother ivory samples. The same elements were analyzed withinelk tooth samples and it should be noted that the elements arenot specific to North America.

From the analysis using MALDI it can be concluded thatmammalian species can be differentiated through ivorysamples. Through the markers compiled by Dr. Daniel Kirby, itwas confirmed that the samples analyzed were elephant andelk. Due to the mammoth sample being fossilized, the lowproportion of remaining collagen made the spectrainconclusive. This confirms that peptide analysis techniques arenot suitable for fossilized samples. There were alsoinconclusive differences noted between African and Asianelephants. Further analysis of spectra and perhaps looking atdifferent makers would possibly prove to be useful.

Through the use of Raman spectroscopy, it could be verifiedthat the hydroxyapatite ν(PO) and collagen ν(CH) peaks couldbe seen throughout the elephant ivory samples. These samepeaks are not strongly apparent in bone, fossilized mammothivory, or elk tooth samples. Most of the data taken showed alow signal-to-noise ratio due to the fluorescence of eachsample. Completely photobleaching the samples prior tospectral collection would resolve this error in future studies.

ARE YOU UP TO THE TUSK? IDENTIFYING IVORY SPECIES USING

ARE YOU UP TO THE TUSK? IDENTIFYING IVORY SPECIES USING RAMANSPECTROSCOPY AND MASS SPECTROMETRY

Chloe Cao1, Hope La Farge2, Adam Ring3, Terry Drayman-Weisser4, Daniel Walter Rowlands2

1Johns Hopkins University; 2University of Maryland, Baltimore County; 3Emory University; 4The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore

Sample Preparation1. Optimize sampling using a Dremel stylus to create powder

and cross section samples.2. Prepare samples accordingly for each of the three

techniques.• Raman Spectroscopy • MALDI• ICP-MS

3. Conduct analysis using bone and antler samples tooptimize parameters.

4. Apply optimized procedures to ivory samples.

Sample Cet1 (A) (B) (C) Cet2 (D) (F) (G)

40.1 1105.7 nd nd 1580.2 nd nd 2854.4 nd

40.2 1105.7 1251.9 1453.9 1580.1 1541 2116.4 2853.8 3015.9

41a.1 1105.9 nd 1454.1 1580.2 1541.2 2116.7 2853.9 3015

41b.1 #1 1105.7 1251 1453.9 1579 1540 2116.4 2853 3015

41b.1 #2 1105.9 nd 1454.2 nd 1541.2 2115.8 2854.8 nd

41b.2 1105.7 nd 1453.9 1579 1540 2116.4 2853 3015

59.1 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1580.2 1541.2 2116.7 2854.5 nd

59.2 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1579 1541.2 2116.7 2854.5 nd

ET.1 1105.8 nd 1427.9 nd n/a 2132.4 2885.6 3033

ET.2 1106 1197.1 1428.3 1551.4 n/a 2131.9 2884.4 nd

MT.1 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd

P.1 1105.9 nd 1454.2 1580.3 1541.2 2116.8 nd nd

P.2 1106.1 nd 1454.4 nd nd nd nd nd

 

Sample ν(PO)

cm-1 I(PO) ν(CH)

cm-1-1I(CH) Ratio

I(CH) / I(PO)

Elephant Ivory 40 932.48 40674.11 2931.13 58957.17 1.469

Elephant Ivory 41a 932.48 27826.76 2918.64 41132.10 1.585

Elephant Ivory 41b 932.48 27237.02 2918.64 42498.24 1.653

Elephant Ivory 59 932.48 22266.91 2918.64 28361.06 1.309

Beef Bone 4 932.48 14259.06 2918.64 18285.85 1.087

Elk Tooth ET.1 932.48 18186.04 2918.64 23079.17 1.251Minoan Snake Goddess, gold and likely elephant ivory16th century BCE (Late Minoan)The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore71.1090

“Pokal” with Royal Portraits, mammoth ivory2nd half of 18th century (Russian)

The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore 71.477

Eu 153 Sr 88 Mn 55 Ba 137 Ba 138 Ni 58 Ni 60 Mo 92 Mo 95 Mo 96 Mo 98 Zn 64 Zn 66 Zn 68

40.1

40.2

41a.1

41b.1

41b.2

59.1

59.2

ET.1

ET.2

MT.1

P1

References 1. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Ed.; In Research Project on theDetermination of Age and the Geographical Origin of African Elephant Ivory; 2013; , pp 11.2. Espinoza, E.; Mann, M., Eds.; In Identification Guide for Ivory and Ivory Substitutes; World Wildlife Fund: 1992; p35.3. Bruker Instructions for Use Peptide Calibration Standard. 2016.4. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D. Ivory and simulated ivory artefacts: Fourier transform Raman diagnostic study. 1995.5. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D.; Holder, J.; Lawson, E. Fourier-transform Raman spectra of ivory III: identification ofmammalian specimens. 1997.6. Edwards, H.; Farwell, D.; Holder, J.; Lawson, E. Fourier-transform Raman spectroscopy of ivory: II. Spectroscopicanalysis and assignments. 1997.7. Shimadzu Principles of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.http://www.shimadzu.com/an/lifescience/maldi/princpl1.html.8. Singh, R.; Goyal, S.; Khanna, P.; Mukherjee, P.; Sukumar, R. Using morphometric and analytical techniques tocharacterize elephant ivory. 2006.9. The Maiman Institute for Proteome Research Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI). https://www.tau.ac.il/lifesci/units/proteomics/voyager.html 2017.

Acknowledgements This project was supported by the Baltimore SCIART research program funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.The students in this program would like to acknowledge Dr. Zeev Rosenzweig (SCIART program director at UMBC),Dr. Daniel Kirby, Dr. Bradley Arnold (UMBC), Joshua Wilhide (MCAC at UMBC), Ian Schaffer (MCAC at UMBC), Dr.Phil Mortimer (JHU), and Dr. Laszlo Takacs (UMBC). Additionally, we acknowledge The Walters Art Museum inBaltimore, the Fasching family, Richard Brown, Dr. Chia-Hua Lue, Dr. Bradley Arnold, and Stacy Davis for donatingsamples to this study.

nd = non-detectable, n/a = non-applicable

ET = elk tooth, MT = mammoth tusk, P = powdered elephant ivoryBlue = high intensity peaks in reference to standard