application form joint project 2009 · application form, tempus joint project – deadline:...

Application Form, Tempus Joint Project – Deadline: 28/04/2009

1

European Commission

Tempus IV

SECOND CALL FOR PROPOSALS N° EAC/01/2009

Application Form

Joint Project 2009

reation of university-enterprise cooperation networks for education on sustainable technologies

Registration number: Registration number (leave empty)

Reception Number: Reception number leave empty


2

SUBMISSION PROCEDURE

Please read carefully the following explanations and instructions (pages 1-5) concerning the submission of your proposal. Applicants are requested to access and download the application form from the internet:

http://ec.europa.eu/tempus.

Before completing the form, please read the Tempus IV Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009, which can be obtained from the Tempus website at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/tempus/call09_en.html.

Applicants have the choice of submitting the application in English, French or German. Only applications using the correct form will be accepted and processed.

1. Application forms must be sent by e-mail, and only this version will be used for assessment pur-

poses; changes made after the original submission will not be accepted or considered. The application forms must be submitted electronically by:

Deadline: 28 April 2009, at 16:00 Central European Summer Time

E-mail Address: [email protected] Applicants are strongly advised not to leave the submission of their applications until the last pos-

sible moment. Applicants should consider that problems arising can only be dealt with during of-fice hours and that technical support will be guaranteed until 16:00 (Central European Summer time) on 28 April 2009. Applicants are therefore strongly advised to submit applications in a timely manner.

2. The supporting and administrative documents must be also be sent by e-mail, in a single pdf file of

the scanned originals, by 12 May 2009 to the same e-mail address (documents sent separately will not be accepted):

[email protected]

The reception number must be indicated in the cover letter accompanying the supporting and ad-ministrative documents to be sent by 12 May 2009.

3. Selection procedure involves many steps and will last several months.

All applicants will be informed in writing of the results of the selection process. Selected proposals

will be subjected to a financial evaluation, in the context of which the Commission may ask the per-sons responsible for the proposed actions to provide additional information and, if appropriate, fi-nancial guarantees.

The intention is to inform succesful and unsuccessful applicants on the results no later than the end

of October 2009.

It is planned that selected applicants will receive their agreements for signature in November 2009.


3

The intentions is to send letters including feedback and recommendations regarding the proposals to

all applicants by the end of 2009. In principle, activities of the selected project should start by 15 January 2010.

Applicants should be aware that upon completion of the selection procedure all communication

concerning this application (such as information on the decision, the provision of feedback to un-successful applicants, etc.) will solely take place with the person indicated in this application as “grant applicant” (reference number 1 in section II, List of Partners).

The information provided in the application is subject to EU legislation on protection of personal

data and confidentiality of information. For further information, please check: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/

NB: Applicants should send an electronic copy of their proposal to the Tempus National Contact Point (for EU-based applicants) and the National Tempus Office (for applicants based in the partner countries). Elec-tronic addresses are available from the Tempus website: http://ec.europa.eu/education/external-relation-programmes/doc70_en.htm


4

THE APPLICATION FORM

This application form contains features that allow the automatic transfer of information into the database used for the selection and narrows down the possibility of applicants’ possible mistakes. Applicants will find below some explanations on the structure of the form as well as some instructions on how to fill it in. Should you encounter any problems, do not hesitate to contact the helpdesk for prompt support to technical problems, at the e-mail address: [email protected] How to complete the form: The structure of the following sections of this form is protected. - Section I: Declaration on Exclusion and Selection Criteria

Agreement on Publication Endorsement Letters Technical Capacity Declaration for Qualifying as Public Body (if applicable) Profit and Loss Accounts (if applicable)

- Section II: Basic Data of the Project List of Partners and/or "Associated" Partners

- Section III: Project Particulars - Section IV: Summary of the Project - Section V: Funding requirements - Section VI: Administrative Documents: Legal entities, Financial identification Applicants are allowed to fill in only the specific fields, which are highlighted in grey while the rest of the form is not editable. There are free-text fields, where any text can be inputted (ex: <<Example text field>>), and selection fields, where you will have to select from a list of predefined values (ex. Choice 1). As a gen-eral rule, in order to type into a field or to select a tick box, click on it with your mouse. You can also easily move from one field to the next using the TAB or arrow keys. In case the requested information is to be provided in the form of a list, you can start a new line after each individual entry by clicking on the “enter” key, within the same field, as in a normal “word” document. Please note that some fields are automatically filled-in based on your input in other fields. For instance, you will only have to input the project title once on the cover page, and it will be displayed in all other sections of the application requesting this information. In general, you should always fill in the first field, requesting the information, which will then be copied into subsequent sections. We therefore recommend that you fill in the form starting from the cover page. In order to ease the navigation in the application form, we recommend using the Document Map feature (from MS Word menu, “View” “Document Map”) Beside these general hints please note the following: - Section II, List of partners: The form includes a limited number of “boxes” for participating partners and/or "Associated" partners and individual experts. Should you plan to involve more partners and/or individual experts than the number pro-vided in this form, please insert their data in the field called: “Contact details for additional partners” and “Contact details for additional individual experts” (providing the same information as is requested in the protected “boxes” for partners and experts). - Section V, Funding requirements: The Summary table n°8 (“Summary of project funding requirements”) will be automatically filled in with the total costs of each heading in the relevant tables n° 1-6. Furthermore, within table n°8, the percentage of co-financing of the project will be verified automatically, once the amount to be co-financed is inserted in the proper field in table n°7.


5

The following sections need to be completed.

The declarations requested in the following pages [Section I; the "Declaration on Exclusion and Selection Criteria",

the "Agreement on Publication", the endorsement letters to be provided and the "Declaration for Qualifying as a

Public Body" (where applicable)] should be signed by the grant applicant and by the person at the grant applicant's

legal entity who is legally authorised to engage the legal entity itself: in case of higher education institutions that

means the rector, vice-rector, president or vice-president, in case of other legal entities the minister, secretary-

general, chairman, executive director or their deputies. Please note that applicants must be legal entities based

in the European Union or in Tempus partner countries.


6

SECTION I: DECLARATION ON EXCLUSION AND SELECTION CRITERIA

To be completed by the Grant Applicant

1. We have stable and sufficient resources of funding to maintain our activities throughout the period during which the project is carried out;

2. We are not bankrupt or being wound up, are not having our affairs administered by the courts, have not entered into an arrangement with creditors, have not suspended business activities, are not subject of proceedings concerning those matters, and are not in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for under national legislation or regulations;

3. We have the professional competencies and qualifications required to complete the proposed project;

4. We have not been guilty of grave professional misconduct proven by any means which the contracting authority can justify;

5. We have not been convicted of an offence concerning our professional conduct by a judgement which has the force of res judicata;

6. We have not been subject of a judgement which has the force of res judicata for fraud, corruption, in-volvement in a criminal organisation or any other illegal activity detrimental to the Communities’ fi-nancial interests;

7. Following an award procedure financed by the Community budget, we have not been declared to be in serious breach of contract for failure to comply with the contractual obligations;

8. We have fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of social security contributions or the payment of taxes in accordance with the legal provisions of the country in which we are established or with those of the country of the contracting authority or those of the country where the contract is to be performed.

We, the undersigned, certify that the information given above and in the following project proposal is cor-rect to the best of our knowledge, and that the proposal has been endorsed by the relevant authorities repre-senting the partners. We, the undersigned, have taken note that if found guilty of false declarations,we will receive financial pen-alties in proportion to the value of the grants in question.

Title of the project: reation of university-enterprise cooperation networks for education on sustainable technologies

Ref. Nr. 0 - Legal Representative of the applying legal entity: First name and surname: Frank Baert Place: Gent Date: 27/04/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy) Position: Managing Director Signature:

Official stamp or seal of the applying legal entity:

Ref. Nr. 1 - Grant Applicant: First name and surname: Geert De Lepeleer Signature:

Place: Gent Date: 27/04/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy)

Registration Number: (Obtained after submission)


7

SECTION I: AGREEMENT ON PUBLICATION

To be completed by the Grant Applicant

In case our proposal will be selected we agree that the Commission will publish the following information:

- name and address of the beneficiary,

- subject of the grant,

- amount awarded and rate of funding


Ref. Nr. 0 - Legal Representative of the applying legal entity: First name and surname: Frank Baert Place: Gent Date: 27/04/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy) Position: Managing Director Signature:

Official stamp or seal of the applying legal entity:





8

SECTION I: ENDORSEMENT LETTERS

All partners (except the applicant legal entity) must submit an endorsement letter to confirm their role and willingness to participate in the project; these must be submitted together with the other sup-porting and administrative documents by the deadline of the 12th of May 2009.

Applicants should follow the model below.

MODEL ENDORSEMENT LETTER

OFFICIAL HEADED PAPER OF THE PARTNER

OBJECTIVE: ENDORSEMENT OF THE TEMPUS PROJECT: (FULL TITLE OF THE PROJECT) CONTENT: Give details of the application, confirming the support of the partner for the project.

Specify the role of the partner in the project and give details on the contact person.

For a partner from one of the partner countries indicate how the project fits into the de-velopment strategy of that partner country in the context of the reform of their higher education system. Please insert a confirmation sentence stating that the partner has read the whole applica-tion, including the financial details, and is aware of the specific role it will have in the project.

SIGNATURE of the person legally authorised to represent the partner: In the case of higher education institution, this means the rector, vice-rector, president or vice-president. In the case of other legal entities, this means the minister, secretary-general, chairman, executive director or their deputies

POSITION of the person legally authorised to represent the partner

DATE: please remember that the date on the endorsement letter must be before the Joint Project appli-cation deadline (i.e. 28 April 2009)

OFFICIAL STAMP or SEAL of the partner

SECTION I: TECHNICAL CAPACITY In order to permit an assessment of their technical capacity, applicants must submit:

A brief CV (maximum of 2 pages) of the grant applicant, proposed members of the key project staff and of each proposed individual expert. The CV of the individual expert has to make explicit refer-ence to the expertise he/she will provide in the Joint Project proposal. The expert CVs are part of the documents to be submitted by 12 may 2009 along with the other administrative and supporting documents.

a list of projects already undertaken in the relevant field by the applicant and by the partners.


9

SECTION I: DECLARATION FOR QUALIFYING AS A PUBLIC BODY To be completed by the Grant Applicant if applicable

For the purpose of this call, the following bodies shall be considered to have the necessary financial, profes-sional and administrative capacity and the necessary financial stability: higher education institutions recognised as such by participating countries, as well as institutions or organisations in the higher education sector which have received over 50 % of their annual revenues from public sources over the last two years, or which are con-trolled by public bodies or their representatives. We, the undersigned, declare by our honour that our institution complies with the above-mentioned defi-nition of public body.


Ref. Nr. 0 - Legal Representative of the Applying Higher Edu-cation Institution: First name and surname: Frank Baert Place: Gent Date: 27/04/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy) Position: Managing Director Signature:

Official stamp or seal of the Applying Higher Education Institution:





10

SECTION I: PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS To be attached by the Grant Applicant if applicable

If the applying legal entity is not or does not qualify as a public body or is not an international organisation it has to provide its profit and loss accounts together with the balance sheet for the last three financial years for which the accounts have been closed.

Application Forms; Tempus Joint Project – Deadline: 28/04/2009

11

SECTION II: BASIC DATA ON THE PROJECT

Title of the project

The title should be concise and accurate, and should not exceed 50 characters in length. For example: Finance and Ad-ministration Training for Civil Servants.

reation of university-enterprise cooperation networks for education on sustainable technologies

Acronym of the project

For example: F.A.T.C.S

TechnoSustainable

Type of the project

Please select from the list below the project type and main theme of the proposal. If your proposal involves more than one category, please indicate the predominant one. It is this category under which your proposal will be evaluated:

Higher Education and Society(HES)

Project duration

Please select from the lists below:

up to 3 yrs

Specific Objectives of the project

1. To bring new curricula on sustainable industry for the staff from industries involved in the project

2. To adopt expirience from EU partners on sustainable industry in the newly developed curricula

3. To bring the knowledge of staff from industry closer to standards in EU partner countries

4. To bring the strategy for education for the staff from industry on sustainble industry issue

Partner country/ies involved

Please tick the relevant box/es:

Western Balkans

AL – Albania MK – former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

BA – Bosnia and Herzegovina RS – Serbia

HR – Croatia 1244 – Kosovo

ME – Montenegro

Eastern Neighbouring Area

AM – Armenia MD – Moldova


12

AZ – Azerbaijan RU – Russian Federation

BY – Belarus UA – Ukraine

GE – Georgia

Southern Neighbouring Area

DZ – Algeria MA – Morocco

EG – Egypt PS – Territory governed by the Palestinian Au-thority

IL – Israel SY – Syria

JO – Jordan TN – Tunisia

LB – Lebanon

Central Asia

KG – Kyrgyzstan TM – Turkmenistan

KZ – Kazakhstan UZ – Uzbekistan

TJ – Tajikistan

Has the grant applicant institution (Ref. No.:0) previously acted as a grant holder / contractor for a European Commission grant / contract? (Please select from the button below.)

Yes If yes, please provide the registration number of the most recent grant agreement / contract: Please specify with which Directorate General of the European Commission the project had been carried out: DG EDUCATION & CULTURE

Subject area code

Please refer to the Glossary of Codes in Annex 5 the Tempus IV Call for Proposals, EAC/01/2009 in order to find the code for the relevant subject area. Please insert ONE code only:

<<500>>

The proposal had already been submitted in a previous call: No

If yes, please provide the registration number:

1.

2.

3.

Reference number of previous Tempus projects in which some or all partners have been involved (if any):

JEP - 13299 JEP - 16104 JP – 18041

JEP – 13301 JEP – 17004 JP – 18084

JEP - 15046 JEP - 17040 JP - 19020


13

Language of application and of future correspondence

All future correspondence related to your project will be in the language that you choose among English, French or Ger-man. Please select from the list below:

English(E)


14

SECTION II: LIST OF PARTNERS

NB: If a public administration authority such as the Ministry of Education is involved, it should be listed here but will participate in the project under the terms laid out in the Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009

Reference number: 0 – Legal representative of the applying legal entity

(same person as listed in the declaration under Ref. nr. 0)

Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Frank Surname: Baert

Function at organisation: Managing Director

Name of the organisation: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven

Type of organisation: Higher Education Institution:

Erasmus Univ. Charter N° Compulsory for applying uni-versities from the EU!

Legal Status: Public Sector(PS)

Faculty: -

Department: -

Country*: BE Postal code:

Town: Gent

Address: Gebroeders Desmetstraat 1

Phone: Country code: 32 City Code: 9 Phone Nr.: 265 86 10

Fax: Country code: 32 City Code: 9 Fax. Nr.: 265 86 25

E-mail: [email protected]

Reference number: 1 – Grant applicant

(same person as listed in the declaration under Ref. nr. 1)

Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Geert Surname: De Lepeleer

Function at organisation: International Relations Officer

Name of the organisation: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven

Type of organisation: Higher Education Institution

Legal Status: Public Sector(PS)

Faculty: General Services

Department: -

Country*: BE Postal code: 9000

Town: Gent

Address: Gebroeders Desmetstraat 1




* Refer to the Call for Proposals, Annex 5, “Glossary of codes” for the relevant codes assigned to countries, which specifies a two letter code for each country. For Kosovo -1244, the code 12 should be used


15

Reference number: 2 – Contact person of partner

Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Zoltan Surname: Zavargo

Function at organisation: dean

Name of the organisation: University of Novi Sad


Faculty: Faculty of Technology

Department: Department of Basic Engineering Disciplines

Country*: RS Postal code: 21000

Town: Novi Sad

Address: Bul. cara Lazara 1

Phone: Country code: 381 City Code: 21 Phone Nr.: 485 3600

Fax: Country code: 381 City Code: 21 Fax. Nr.: 450 413



Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Peter Surname: Heck

Function at organisation: Executive Director of the Institute of Applied Material Flow

Name of the organisation: Trier University of Applied Sciences

Type of organisation: Higher Education Insitution

Faculty: Environmental Campus Birkenfeld

Faculty of Environmental Economics and Environmental Law

Institute for Applied Material Flow Management

Department: -

Country*: GE Postal code: 55761

Town: Birkenfeld

Address: Campusallee 9926; PO Box 1380; 55761 Birkenfeld



E-mail: [email protected] * Refer to the Call for Proposals, Annex 5, “Glossary of codes” for the relevant codes assigned to countries, which specifies a two letter code for each country. For Kosovo -1244, the code 12 should be used


16


Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Wilhelm Surname: Hoeflinger

Function at organisation: Head of the research area „Mechanical Process Engineering and Clean Air

Technology“, Institute of Chemical Engineering

Name of the organisation: Vienna university of Technology


Faculty: Technical Chemistry

Department: -

Country*: AT Postal code: 1060

Town: Vienna

Address: Getreidemarkt 9 / 166, A-1060

Phone: Country code: 43 City Code: 1 Phone Nr.: 58801-15910

Fax: Country code: 43 City Code: 1 Fax. Nr.: 58801-15999



Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Milorad Surname: Cakic

Function at organisation: dean

Name of the organisation: University of Nis

Type of organisation: Higher Education Insitution


Department: -


Town: Leskovac

Address: Bulevar oslobodjenja 124






17


Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Radoslav Surname: Grujić

Function at organisation: Professor

Name of the organisation: University of East Sarajevo



Department: Food Technology

Country*: BA Postal code: 76300

Town: Zvornik

Address: Karakaj bb

Phone: Country code: 387 City Code: 56 Phone Nr.: 263353

Fax: Country code: 387 City Code: 56 Fax. Nr.: 260190



Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Midhat Surname: Jašić

Function at organisation: Head for professorships of food technology

Name of the organisation: Tuzla University


Faculty: Facultz of Technology

Department: -


Town: Tuzla

Address: Univerzitetsk br 8





18


Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Emilija Surname: Fidancevska

Function at organisation: Associate professor

Name of the organisation: University Ss Cyril and Methodius


Faculty: Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy

Department: Department of Inorganic Technology

Country*: MK Postal code: 1000

Town: Skopje

Address: Ruger Boskovic 16





Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Vineta Surname: Srebrenkoska

Function at organisation: Lecturerer

Name of the organisation: University Goce Delcev



Department: -


Town: Stip

Address: Krste Misirkov bb






19


Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Katrien Surname: Moens

Function at organisation: COORDINATOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

Name of the organisation: VOKA-Chamber of Commerce East-Flanders

Type of organisation: Other

Faculty: -

Department: -

Country*: BE Postal code: 9200

Town: DENDERMONDE

Address: Noordlaan 21





Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Jovan Surname: Vujičić

Function at organisation: Special Adviser of President

Name of the organisation: Chamber of Economy of Vojvodina


Faculty: -

Department: -


Town: Novi Sad

Address: Hajduk Veljkova 11






20


Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Goran Surname: Jovic

Function at organisation: President

Name of the organisation: Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry


Faculty: -

Department: -


Town: Leskovac

Address: Stojana Ljubica 2





Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Slavica Surname: Marković

Function at organisation: Secretary of Concil for European integration

Name of the organisation: Chamber of Commerce and Industry Bijeljina Region


Faculty: -

Department: -


Town: Bijeljina

Address: Ive Andrića bb






21


Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Nedret Surname: Kikanovic

Function at organisation: Director

Name of the organisation: The chamber of Economy of Tuzla Canton


Faculty: -

Department: [


Town: Tuzla

Address: Trg slobode b.b.





Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Zorica Surname: Meskova

Function at organisation: Independent consultant

Name of the organisation: Economic chamber of Macedonia

Type of organisation: Enterprise

Faculty: -

Department: Department of chemical industry


Town: Skopje

Address: Str. Dimitrie Cupovski 13





22


Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Vladimir Surname: Erdelji

Function at organisation: Developmet engineer

Name of the organisation: Alltech-Fermin a.d. Senta


Faculty: -

Department: Development Laboratory


Town: Senta

Address: Karadjordjeva bb





Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Ljubisa Surname: Radenkovic

Function at organisation: Director

Name of the organisation: Senta Sugar Factory


Faculty: -

Department: -


Town: Sentac

Address: Karadjordjeva bb






23

Contact details of additional Partners

Should the number of partners exceed 17, please use the following space to add additional members. The follow-ing information must be included for each contact person:

Title, first name and surname, position at institution, type of organisation, name of institution, name of faculty, name of department, COMPLETE address, Phone, Fax and e-mail.

18. Title: Mr. (M)

First name: Igor Surname: Denic

Position at institutions: Director

Name of institution: DCP Hemigal

Type of organization: Enterprise

Faculty: -

Department: -

Country: RS

Adress: 16000 Leskovac Tekstilna 97, Serbia

Phone: +381 16 213 228

Fax: +381 16 250 246

E-mail: [email protected] :

19. Title: Mr. (M)

First name: Radoslav Surname: Filipović

Position at institutions: Director

Name of institution: Birac


Faculty: -

Department: -

Country: BA

Adress: 75400 Zvornik Karakaj bb, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Phone: +387 56 260 456

Fax: +387 56 260 454


20. Title: Mr. (M)

First name:Dino Surname: Ćerimagić

Position at institutions: Quality manager

Name of institution: Vegafruit d.o.o.


Faculty: -

Department: Technical department

Country: BA

Adress: Mala Brijesnica, 74206 Doboj istok

Phone: +387 35 727 000

Fax: +387 35 727 799

E-mail [email protected]

21. Title: Mr. (M)

First name: Saso Surname: Eftov

Position at institutions: Chief of the Technical Department

Name of institution: BOMEX Refractory


24


Faculty: -

Department: -

Country: MK

Adress: 2326 Pehcevo Industrijska 5, MK

Phone: +389 33 441 171

Fax: +389 33 441 358


22. Title: Mr. (M)

First name: Goce Surname: Spirkoski

Position at institutions: Head of commercial department

Name of institution: EUROKOMPOZIT


Faculty: -

Department: -

Country: MK

Adress: 7500 Prilep, Aleksandar Makedonski 2/42, MK

Phone: +389 48 422 330

Fax: +389 48 421 292

E-mail commerce @eurokompozit.com.mk


25

List of proposed individual experts: Please note that individual experts cannot come from any of the partner organisations, neither as staff nor as stu-dents, as people within the partner organisations can be involved in the project directly.

Reference: i – Individual expert (from non-partners) proposed for specific tasks in project

(CV must be included of a maximum of 2 pages)

Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Gyula Surname: Vatai

Function at organisation: Vice Dean for Education, Head of Department

Name of the organisation: Corvinus University of Budapest


Faculty: Faculty of Food Science

Department: Department of Food Engineering

Country*: HU Postal code: 1118

Town: Budapest

Address: Menesi ut 44.




Reference: ii – Individual expert (from non-partners) proposed for specific tasks in project


Title: Mr.(M)

First name: Adam Surname: Pawelczyk

Function at organisation: Academic teacher

Name of the organisation: Wroclaw University of Technology


Faculty: Chemistry

Department: -

Country*: PL Postal code: 50370

Town: Wroclaw

Address: ul. Wybrezeze Wyspianskiego 27






26

Reference: iii – Individual expert (from non-partners) proposed for specific tasks in project


Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Surname:

Function at organisation:

Name of the organisation:

Type of organisation: <<Click here to select>>

Faculty:

Department:

Country*: Postal code:

Town:

Address:

Phone: Country code: City Code: Phone Nr.:

Fax: Country code: City Code: Fax. Nr.:

E-mail:

Reference: iv – Individual expert (from non-partners) proposed for specific tasks in project


Title: Mrs.(F)

First name: Surname:

Function at organisation:

Name of the organisation:

Type of organisation: <<Click here to select>>

Faculty:

Department:

Country*: Postal code:

Town:

Address:

Phone: Country code: City Code: Phone Nr.:

Fax: Country code: City Code: Fax. Nr.:

E-mail: Refer to the Call for Proposals, Annex 5, “Glossary of codes” for the relevant codes assigned to countries, which specifies a two letter code for each country. For Kosovo -1244, the code 12 should be used

List of individual experts

Should the number of individual experts exceed 4, please use the following space to add additional experts. The following information must be included for each contact person:

Title, first name and surname, function at institution, type of organisation, name of institution, name of faculty, name of department, COMPLETE address, Phone, Fax and e-mail.


27

SECTION III: PROJECT PARTICULARS

This application form requires a general understanding of the Logical Framework Matrix approach and some familiarity with the vocabulary associated with it. Applicants who have never used the approach are therefore advised to familiarise themselves with it and to consult one of the numerous handbooks available on the subject on the internet. In section III you are required to provide detailed information on your project in the form of narrative parts and accompanying tables; the information provided should not be repetitive but complementary. In the narra-tive sections you are expected to describe aspects of your project from a strategic and methodological point of view whereas in the tables you are asked to enter into greater detail in relation to aspects such as expected out-comes, activities, inputs and budgetary requirements. Applicants should note that each proposal will be assessed on the basis of the elements included in this applica-tion only. You can include web site references in your application, but the assessment of your proposal will not be based on additional information found on a website but not contained within the application. III.1 BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT A maximum of four pages, (A4 size)

III.1a Problem analysis / Relevance You should present the justification for the project and clearly identify the specific problem/s which the pro-posed project intends to solve. Explain why this/these problem/s has/have been selected to be addressed, as opposed to others, and how the project proposal fits into the development strategies of the involved partners. Your information should be descriptive and specific to the subject of the proposal. Also, please describe briefly how your project proposal was prepared. Improving the level of the environment protection and the level of sustainability of the industry in WB countries: Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The level of environment protection and sustainablity of industry in Serbia According to the Report of the state of the environment in Serbia, UN from 2007. there are pollution areas caused by industrial emissions (SO2, NOx, CO2, particulate matter, soot, etc.) and cumulative pollution resulting from concentrated petrochemicals, oil refinery and nitrogen industry in confined areas. Due to industrial discharge, there are pollution of canals and water bodies and the contamination of its sediments from point and non-point organic pollution sources. Contamination of soil are resulted from industrial, mining, agricultural and traffic activities. The wastes are also a huge problem in Serbia, only about 60 – 70% of municipal solid waste is collected. This is about 2.2 million m3 per day. The average person generates approximately 290 kg of waste per year. At present there are 180 officially registered landfills for disposal of municipal waste in Serbia. The industrial origin of the wastes are about 20%. The capacity for reciclyng the wastes on idustrial level is very limited. The wastes are not used as a fuel in Serbia. According to the National strategy it is estimated that the total annual damages in Serbia caused by inadequate waste management range from 98 to 276 million Euros, which equals 0.4% to 1.1% of GDP. The industrial part of it is ranging from 19 to 55 million Euros. After the privatization part of the industry began the process of adopting their technologies to the EU standards. But the situation is far to be close to that it is present in EU. The level of environment protection and sustainability of industry in Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to Report of the state of environment in Bosnia and Herzegovina and entity Republic of Srpska obtained from UN and many EU organizations there are pollution areas caused by industrial emissions (SO2, NO2, CO2, particulate matter, soot, etc) and cumulative pollution resulting from concentrated


28

petrochemicals, oil refinery and nitrogen industry in confined areas. Due to industrial discharge, there are pollution of canals and water bodies and the contamination of its sediments from point and non-point organic pollution sources. Concerning the soil, contamination of soil is resulted from industrial, mining, agricultural and traffic activities. The wastes are also huge problem in Bosnia and Herzegovina, very little percentage of municipal solid waste is collected (in this moment we have not exact data). The average person generates approximately between 250 and 350 kg of waste per year, and it is similar with other West Balkan countries. At present there are not precise numbers of officially registered landfills for disposal of municipal waste in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The industrial origin of the waste is between 15 – 30%. The capacity for recycling the wastes on industrial level is very limited. The wastes are not use as a fuel in Bosnia and Herzegovina. After the privatization part of the industry began the process of adopting their technologies to the EU standards, but the situation is far to be close to that it is present in EU. The level of environment protection and sustainablity of industry in Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The level of waste in Macedonia is very high taking into account the low level of economic development that result in the pollution of air, lands and water. From total waste generated municipal solid waste has significant part. It is estimated that 570 000 tones municipal solid waste is generated every year and average per capita 250-315kg. Typical municipal solid waste consist of 3, 14% ashes, 8, 00% paper and cardboard, 47, 29% biodegradable waste, 1, 7% glass and 21, 29% other types of waste. There are 25 landfills registered in Macedonia for municipal waste disposal. Republic of Macedonia has relatively high emission of greenhouse (methane and carbon dioxide) gases by GDP. In the emission of greenhouses gases the main role and dominate place has energetic sector with 71%, than agriculture, waste, industrial processes and forestry. Water pollution is evident in rivers and in the groundwater. In the recent years the stations for water purifications were established, but still the quality of water is not in the necessary level. Air quality problems are limited to major urban area. About 30% of the population influenced from the poor air quality. In the course of privatization there are attempts for introducing close cycles for the generated wastes in the industries. The capacities for utilizing the wastes as raw materials are on the low level and there are still open questions. Medium sized enterprises with new technologies according to the EU standards are introduced. Lately, there are attempts for waste recycling in the private medium sized enterprises. The factory for biodisel production from renewable recourses was opened in 2007 and it covers 30 000 t from the demands of fuels in Macedonia. The EU regulations and directive concerning waste management are in the focus of attention for the industry. These regulations put pressure on producers to consider the waste treatment. Examples are prohibition against landfill, producer responsibility for specific groups of products, and eventually taxes on waste incineration. All these regulations are aiming for material recycling, due to decreased environmental impact.. The Government of the Republic of Macedonia, on the Session held on 11 March 2008 adopted Waste Management Strategy of the Republic of Macedonia for the period 2008-2020. Sustainable waste management system according to the approximation of the national legislation with the EU, change in institutional organization and in general management practice will be priority. Generally, the EU directives are in the force, but still Republic of Macedonia is in the process for adapting the industry concerning the sustainability of waste management. It is a fact that the industrial staff is not properly educated and has a lack of knowledge concerning sustainable development. The level of sustainabiliy in EU The present trends in EU is to create a zero emission society. The concept of zero emissions is based on improving technologies and processes to the point of maximum resource productivity and virtually no waste. Zero emissions may appear an unrealistic objective, yet it is a proven and profitable goal. There are numerous of examples in EU of zerro emission concept applied in industry and communities as well. This concept application makes industry sustainable and less energy dependant. There is no doubt that this is a great challenge to EU and a great task opportunity to WB countries. The goal for WB countries is to be as close as possibe to EU industry at the time when they will join EU. This is, of course, also a great opportunity for WB countries to make their industry more sustainable and as to reduce the extra cost for feedstock and energy. Improving the levell of sustainabilty in WB countries The team from the partner universities has got great knowledge and experience in research, innovation and education. This knowledge, with the help of EU partners, can be of great value to Industry, as well as to the Society via energy efficency and zero emission practice. The present team from WB univirseties will in this way get closer to LLL system of EU on this very important issue of bringing WB industry sustainable.


29

The engineers/staff from the industry will get updated knowledge necessary to create a sustainable and emission efficient enterprise. The origin of the idea for the Project proposal The previous Tempus project JEP – 19020, shows great interest of the staff from industry, not only in the Environmental management issue (which was the subject of the previous Project) but also, or maybe even more, in the problems in technology related to excess energy consumption and environmental pollution. How to build sustainable industry and how to be more competitive, that is the challenge? How to build a sustainable industry, and how to become more competitive, poses a very challenging task. With Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, EU partner from Belgium, the partner universities from Serbia (Novi Sad and Niš) had very successful cooperation during the realization of the Tempus project JEP – 19020. In this project the problem of environmental protection was touched. At the last year of the Project it was decided to continue working together in a new Tepmus project. The first version of the project was built almost one year before. The cooperation with Trier University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Applied Material Flow Management (IfaS) goes back to 2007. The professors from Novi Sad were there for the first time. There they had the opportunity to see a practical solution of zero emission concept as well as their system of education concerning this issue. The Instute has great experience in realizing the zero emission concept. They have strong connection with industry and municipalty as well as with local authorities in realizing many practical problems concerning zero emission. The University of Novi Sad has a cooperation agreement with the Technical University in Vienna. One of our fomer students is there at the moment on his PhD studies. The Institute of Chemical Engineering has a strong group dealing with Clean air technology and Group dealing with Zero Emission Energy Technology. All the partner universities have experience in cooperation with industry and experiency in environmental issues. They have solved many practical problems of industry and municipality concerning sustainability and zero emission concept. They also have a strong interest and will to enhance the cooperation with enterprises and to go into LLL programme more intensively. Having in mind our activities and regional and national priorities we found that it was the best and most promising topic for cooperation. It is expected that this project will result in closer cooperation between universities and enterprises in WB countries and closer cooperation of WB-WB and WB-EU universities. It will also enhance the level of WB industries concerning sustainability.

III.1b Presentation of the partners and external experts In this section you should explain why the selected partners are best suited to participate in the project and describe their particular expertise in relation to the project objectives. Partners should be chosen due to their specific capacities, expertise and experience necessary to achieve the project objective. Please focus on ele-ments which are essential for the project, such as

particular capacity and expertise

relevant previous experience

contacts beneficial to the project etc.

In case of involvement of external experts, please describe their specific expertise and contribution to the project.

1. Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, contractor Gent, Belgium The Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven was founded in 1996. The number of students is about 5000 and has Bachelor and Master Education in the following study fields: agriculture, health care, commercial sciences and management, teaching, industrial sciences and technology. KaHo Sint-Lieven is the member of the ‘Association K.U. Leuven’ that links 12 polytechnics and 1 university, with more than 70 000 students in all. All courses are completely structured according to the Bologna declaration. Innovation in vocational education and the promotion of competence based education have high priority in the educational policy of KaHo Sint-Lieven. In the past KaHo Sint-Lieven has built up a large experience in contracting and coordinating European projects in general and Tempus projects in particular. They are experts in curricula development, vocational education


30

and training, LLL and environmental management issues. In the past they had a great number of Tempus projects. 2. University of Novi Sad, co-coordinator Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad, RS The University of Novi Sad was founded on 20th June 1960. Today it comprises 14 faculties. It is a comprehensive university covering all major fields of study, with nearly 40 000 students, 2 600 professors and assistants and 1100 members of non-teaching staff. The Faculty of Technology in Novi Sad was founded in 1959 with the aim to provide academic education for food technology engineers. Today there are basically three options: food, chemical and pharmaceutical engineering. From the academic year 2004/05, the Faculty of Technology has reformed its studies according to the Bologna declaration. In 2008. the Faculty got the national accreditation. In the school year of 2008/09 all study programmes began to run according to the accreditation. A new study course was introduced: Eco-energetic engineering. The Faculty has great experience concerning environmental protection, biotechnology and energy efficiency issues. There is effective connection and cooperation between industry and the Faculty. In the past 5 years projects were run with the aim to improve technology and to reduce energy consumption. The Faculty took party in making strategies for the development of the Province in the area of renewable applications and water resources management. 3. Trier University of Applied Sciemces The Institute for Applied Material Flow Management, IFaS Birkenfeld, Germany The Trier University of Applied Sciences with 6100 students (2008) is the largest University of Applied Sciences in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate. The Institute for Applied Material Flow Management is an institute based at the Environmental Campus Birkenfeld, is part of the Trier University of Applied Sciences. The aim of the IfaS is to promote the sustainable optimization of regional and operational material flows in specific and practice-oriented projects. An intelligent, resource-efficient dealing with materials and material flows constitutes the backbone of a sustainable society. The IFaS has the following master programme linked directly to the project proposal: Master Program “International Material Flow Management”. The aim of the “International Material Flow Management” is to create economically-efficient and environmentally-sound use of materials, material streams and energy in companies, administrations and entire regions. 4.Vienna University of Technology Institute for Chemical Engineering, Vienna, AT The Technical university in Vienna was founded in 1815. Instutute for Chemical enginering. Due to the major focus of the Institute towards technological/industrial application, there has traditionally been a large number of thematically diverse collaborative projects with industry. The inclusion of Environmental Sciences will complement previous strategies towards integrated Environmental Protection enable more efficient solutions on a broader basis. In this regard a clear focus of the available core competences on scientific and technological problems in industry as well as on the main scientific areas promoted by the various funding organizations will continue to be crucial for the further development of the institute. The institute is organized in seven research areas, which themselves consist of several working groups. The group which deals with clean air technology and Zero emission Energy Technology group are the most interesting for the Application of this project. 5. University of Niš Faculty of Technology, Leskovac, RS The University of Niš was founded on June 15, 1965. The University presently comprises thirteen faculties and employs 1480 faculty and 630 administrative staff, with the student body of 27,570. Since its foundation, 43,259 students have graduated from the University, 2025 have won master degree and 1128 were awarded PhD. diplomas. The Faculty of Technology of the University of Niš was founded in 1979. Today, at the Faculty of Technology in Leskovac there are three levels in academic studies. Bachelor and Master academic studies are realized through three program studies: chemical technologies, food technology, biotechnology and textile technologies. The three-year PhD degree programme is organised in accordance with the technological engineering programme. The teaching staff of the Faculty of Technology of Leskovac consists of 19 professors, 10 associate professors, 1 assistant professor with a doctor’s degree, 11 assistant professors, 10


31

beginner assistants. The Faculty organizes the traditional International Symposium ‘Modern Technologies and Industrial Development’. The Symposium is held biennially under the auspices of the Ministry of Science and Environment Protection of the Republic of Serbia. The Faculty has great expirience in bio-technology, clean technology and renewables. 6. University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology, Zvornik, Republic Srpska, BA The University of East Sarajevo has over 20 bilateral agreements signed with partner universities from Europe and Russia. The University of East Sarajevo is a member of several university networks and international associations. The University of East Sarajevo has participated in TEMPUS projects since 2000, FP6 projects, FP7 project; and other international project - such as project dealing with Brain Drain in West Balkan Countries, financed by UNESCO, USAID, and World Bank. Faculty of Technology in Zvornik get academic education for study program Chemical engineering and technology in two optimal module Chemical technology and Food technology. From the academic year 2004/05, Faculty of Technology has been reformed according to Bologna declaration. In 2007/08 Faculty got the license for study program Chemical engineering and technology from the Ministry of Education Republic of Srpska. The faculty of Technology has about 250 students, 34 professors and assistants and 15 non – teaching staff. There is a lot of experience and it has been done to improve higher education system. Our faculty has closed contact to industry and huge experience in faculty – enterprise cooperation. The Faculty has great experience concerning environmental protection, bio-technology and energy efficiency issue. 9. Tuzla University, Tuzla, BA The Faculty of Technology was founded 50 years ago. Nowadays the Faculty is a well-organized higher education institution and offers a wide range of highly acclaimed programmes, both at undergraduate and postgraduate level. The Faculty carry out the learning process into three teaching departments:chemical technology (chemical engineering and environmental engineering), food technology and environment protection..Faculty works in the framework of integrated Tuzla University. Academic 2003/2004. year enrolled first generation students under the Bologna process, when introduced the European system of credits transfer according to the new plan and curriculum. The Faculty has great expirience in food and envirronmental protection technologies. 8. University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, MK The Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje was founded in 1949. At the Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy (FTM) six departments and seven different study courses are realized. The study courses are upgrade concerning to the needs of society and Bologna principles. The FTM has long term cooperation with foreign universities and the projects were realized in the frame of different programs like NATO, TEMPUS, UNIDO, EUREKA, FP 5,6 and 7 relating to the environmental protection, energy efficiency issues and food technology. The FTM is open to create new curriculla on sustainable industry for the staff from industry with the actual themes regarding to the zero emissions, sustainable technologies and environmental protection. As concerns, to the previous experience from the realized projects and the possibilities to transfer the knowledge from EU partner the faculty will be crucial factor for upgrading the knowledge of the staff from industry regarding the issues of sustainable technologies. In this way FTM will be closer to LLL system of EU on the actual problem of reaching WB industry sustainable. 10. Goce Delcev University (UGD) was founded on 27 March 2007 by the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia. The University shares its organization with many European universities, and follows an integrated-university model. The state-run Goce Delcev University based in Stip is an institution of higher education that aims at satisfying the demand for higher education not only in the eastern region of the country, but also in South-Eastern and North-Eastern Macedonia. The university uses a new approach to students and education, in accordance with the practice and experience of European universities. The principles of this approach are: student-cantered education, individual approach to the student and interactive classes. In 2008/09 academic year the University includes 6 new faculties and among them is Faculty of Technology. The Faculty of Technology is currently involved in more projects towards development of environmentally friendly technologies for production of thermoplastic-based composites, including newly developed textile performs based on synthetic/technical or natural fibers, which offer potential of recycling and reutilization of technological waste. The member staffs from Faculty


32

of Technology were the WB-participant of the ECO-PCCM project (FP6-INCO-CT-2004-509185). The University takes part in many other international projects of general public interest as Tempus projects: „Geomagnetic measurements and quality standards“ and „Integrating E-Learning across Teachers Curriculum in Macedonia“. The current Tempus project will establish the cooperation of the new-formed UGD with industrial partners in Macedonia, as well as with educational institutions from EU countries. 11. Chamber of Commerce East-Flanders, BE East Flanders is the second largest Chamber of Commerce in Belgium. The Chamber has been established in 1729. We currently have more than 3000 members, representing 60% of all the companies in East Flanders. Our largest companies are Arcelor Mittal, Volvo, Callebaut, Honda, Voka wants to create the best possible environment for successful entrepreneurship, and wants to contribute to the prosperity and well-being of this region in a fundamental way. Voka Chambers of Commerce Flanders has 17.500 member companies spread over 8 Chambers in Flanders. Voka wants to create the best possible environment for successful entrepreneurship, and wants to contribute to the prosperity and well-being of this region in a fundamental way. 12. Chamber of Economy of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, RS The main task of the Chamber of Economy of Vojvodina is to facilitate the cooperation between the legal authorities on the one hand and the companies on the other hand. It is in full accordance with the Chamber's strategy to offer retraining and updating sessions to its industry members. It is planned that the created course will be held to specific companies (The sugar factory in Senta and Alltech-Fermin will be the first companies). After the course is finished the results of the course as well as a short presentation of the Zero emission concept will be done at the Chamber of commerce for a limited number of enterprises. One of these companies will be the next enterprise to whom the course will be adopt and be held. The selection of companies and the work schedule will be done together with the Chamber of economy. 13. Regional Chamber of Commerce, Leskovac, RS The regional chamber of commerce of Leskovac is an independent, non-governmental, expert, professional and interest association of all production, trade and service companies, banks, financial institutions and other legal and physical persons. The basic task of the Chamber is the realization of economic cooperation with the world, informing foreign partners of the economic and tourist possibilities of this Region, gathering, processing and distribution of information on the supply and demand of services and goods, representing the mutual interests of the members at the governmental agencies, initiating management development in companies promoting scientific-technological development and quality services, as well as quality and standards, innovating knowledge in economy and advancing information in economy. 14.: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina Region, BA Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina Region belongs to chamber system of Republic Srpska and covers territory of 12 municipalities in the north east part of RS. This region is among the most developed regions in the Republic of Srpska. This is due to a good geographic position, fertile land, ample forests and ore deposit.Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina region will assist in project implementation by identifying potential beneficiaries of the program, providing them with relevant information in this regard. In addition the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina Region will take active part during seminars/courses as well as after seminars, by evaluating courses and their impact on beneficiaries. The Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina region will take a lead in logistics arrangements for such events in Bijeljina region. The Chamber in its possession has conference room that can host up to 30 participants and can be used as venue for organizing relevant events. 15. The Cantonal chamber of economy Tuzla The Cantonal chamber of economy Tuzla is independent, non-governmental, non-profitable, public legal association of legal entities involved in business activity in the area of Tuzla Canton. Within its independent activities The Chamber controls low of economic trends, influence of market on position of certain business activities, banks' credit policy, coordinates work with developing projects of wide interests, tides scientific-research and innovation flows with economy of the Canton. The key functions of the chamber are representation of the members' interests, improvement of the work and business and offering of the appropriate services. With its activities the Chamber contributes to development and protection of business ethic and good business manners, protects consumers, improvement of staff skills through seminars and education,


33

improvement of information system. 16. Chamber of Commerce, Skopje, MK The Economic Chamber of Macedonia (ECM) is a referent institution of the business in Macedonia with around 15.000 members on voluntary bases out of which most are small and medium enterprises. The ECM is a member of the International Chamber of Commerce, the Euro chamber, the Association of the Balkan Chambers and accomplishes cooperation or is a member of large number of other regional and international economic associations. The Chamber's policy is to put forward retraining and updating meeting to its industry members. The primary mission of the ECM is to support the collaboration link connecting the legal authorities with the companies from Macedonia. In this project it is intended that the formed course will be thought to the first proposed companies: BOMEX and EUROKOMPOZIT. When the course will be ended the results will be presented to the group of the ECM and to the representatives from industries. The next industries and the working plan will be selected in the mutual aid with the Economic Chamber. 17. Alltech-Fermin, Senta, RS Alltech-Fermin, originally called OOUR Fermin, was founded in 1078. The factory in Senta is Alltech's European Production Flagship, whicg is ideally situated to supply Alltech's market in Eastern and Western Europe. The company employs approximately 260 people anf the core activity is still yeast production. Alltech-Fermin's freash yeast can be purchased in such diverse location as Poland, Macedonia, Croatia and Romania. At present Alltech-Fermin controls more than 50% of the Serbian fresh yeast market. Alltech is commiteted to protecting the environment which in Southern Europe has been neglected for many years. Recently, the 6.500.000 € contract was signed for a state-of-the-art waste water treatment facility. Inthe future the Alltech-Fermin is interested in energy efficiency issue. 18. Sugar factory Senta, RS Sugar factory in Senta is a Serbia-based company engaged in the manufacture of beet sugar. Its product range includes white and brown sugar, in various packaging, as well as by-products of sugar production, such as dried sugar beet and molasses. The Company sells various kinds of sugar under the brand name Notadolce, including sugar for marmalades and jams, sugar with vanilla, natural brown sugar, white crystal sugar and castor sugar. In addition, the Company produces and distributes steam and hot water for the purpose of heating, using organic waste. Italy-based company SAIEST SpA has a major stake in the Company. The company is willing to have courses on sustainable technologies issue especially on zero energy emission concept. 19. DCP Hemigal, Leskovac, RS DCP HEMIGAL was founded 22.03.1995. years and his primary activity is the development and production of cosmetic preparations. During the years the company has continuously developed and insisted on product quality, detailed and strict internal control and making a fast and efficient transport of products to customers, thereby achieve satisfaction of end users and has become one of the best-known manufacturer of cosmetic preparations in the region. DCP HEMIGAL mission is to provide products with excellent quality to the end – users and customers, along with maximum professional growth of employees and selfless concern about public community. DCP HEMIGAL is very interested in clean technology and zero material emission. 20. Birac, Zvornik, BA Birac started its production on 6 th October 1978 when Alumina Factory was released into operation. In the period between 1984 and 1989, Birac took a special care for alumosilicate chemistry development during which five plants were built and released into operation, which beside raw material recourses used Alumina factory’s infrastructure. Birac in its immediate surroundings, has available all necessary raw materials, i. e. bauxite and quartz sand, and supplying with energy is fully assured. Birac also possesses its own thermo-electric power plant, as well as workshops for process equipment and techniques maintaining. Now Birac has 1022 employer, from who 60 employer with University diploma (bachelor). Factory Birac undertake some activities for environment protection in present, but it intend to improve environment protection in next perioiod. 21. BOMEX Refractory AD Pehcevo BOMEX REFRACTORY, Pehcevo is a part of BOMEX holding. Production of refractory materials in the factory is over 40,000t (installed capacities are for production over 50,000t). The main market for the products is Russian and Balkan market, where company exports over 20,000 t of refract. In the last 5 years the company participated in 4 national projects and in FP6 framework projects


34

which were in direct connection with the environmental issues and sustainable development of the wastes. The issues proposed in these projects are in accordance with the strategy of the company to up grade the knowledge of the staff concerning sustainable technologies. 22. Oktomvri-Eurokompozit The Company was established in 1952. The company has 461 employees. The production program of the company Production technologies recently applied in the company are: impregnation, filament winding, moulding compounding, compression moulding, pultrusion etc., and the main civil oriented products are technical laminates, decorative laminates, composite cylinders, pipes, rods, etc. In the last 5 years the company participated in 4 national projects and in FP6 framework projects which were in direct connection with the environmental issues and sustainable development of the wastes. The issues proposed in these projects are in accordance with the strategy of the company to up grade the knowledge of the staff concerning sustainable technologies. 23. EU individual expert, Prof. Gyula Vatai, Corvinus university, Budapest, HU Prof. Dr. Gyula Vatai is vice dean for education of the Faculty of Food Science at Corvinus University of Budapest and head of the Department of Food Engineering. The department performs research on membrane separation processes using different foodstuffs, wastewater, etc.. Prof. Vatai’s expertise is documented by 90 scientific articles, chapters to 5 books, 4 patents and his work was presented on 249 conferences. Prof. Vatai is a member in several scientific associations, e.g. the European Society of Membrane Science and Technology, Hungarian Chemical Society – Group of Membrane Technology, member of the editorial Board of Food and Bioprocess Technology. 24. EU individual expert, PhD. Prof. Adam Pawelczyk, assistant professor, Wroclaw university of technology, Wroclaw, PL Adam Pawelczyk is assistant professor at Wroclaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry. He particapate in many Tempus project like TEMPUS Project CM-SCM-C024A06 “Quality Management for promoting university-enterprise cooperation, Since 1998. he is an expert for Environmental Impact Assessment appointed by the Polish Ministry of Environment. Since 1977 he has a various contracts carried out for industrial companies. Among many patents it is worth to mention: "Equipment for continuous cleaning of exhaust gas", W 104631, 29.04.1996. Current lectures connected with topics of the Proposal are: Utilization of Wastes, Environmental Hazards, Designing of Chemical Technological Plants and Cleaner Production Technologies (in English).

III.2 THE PROJECT A maximum of four pages , (A4 size). Having already identified the problems and needs in Section III.1a, in this narrative part you should describe the project fully. It must be clearly and directly related to the identified problems.

Address as appropriate the following points in your description of the project:

academic content

pedagogical methodology

involvement of academics, students and stakeholders at large

quality assurance processes

convergence with EU higher education policies

For example, present:


35

a clear definition of what the duration and structure of new or up-dated course/s will be, identify any in-novative subjects which will be introduced as a result of project activities and a description how the pro-ject activities will progress over time

an explanation of which groups will be involved (for example, administrative/academic/students and/or their representatives,) and how they will be involved, as project staff or as target group

a clear indication of how many training courses will be prepared and delivered during the project life and forecasts of how many people will be trained and a description of the improved and new skills that will be acquired by the trainees;

a description of new (teaching) methodology/ies and new equipment to be introduced and of how they-will contribute to teaching, learning and managing (Joint Projects) or policy development, system change and legislation (Structural Measures)

a description of what changes will be introduced at institutional level as a result of the activities;

the number and duration of mobilities, etc.

You must clearly indicate the working methodologies and processes to be used.

The outcomes that will be achieved in each year should be described and information on the activities, and the resources that will be required to achieve them, should be provided.

The aim of this project is to improve the university-enterprise cooperation in the process of creating a sustainable industry in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. To achieve this goal the partner universities will create a special course on Sustainable industry and thus enhance the LLL process and cooperation between industry and universities in the WB countries. The most often used definition for sustainable development is that was used by Brundtland Commission: "Sustainable development meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs". Sustainable development is a pattern of resource use and is the way in which developing countries undergo industrialization with the aim to avoid the current situation in industrialized societies with a high level of emission. The environmental sustainability is rather a process than action. It is the process of making current processes sustainable in their interaction with the environment. The concept of sustainability requires such human activities which use only nature's resources at a rate at which they can be replenished naturally. The aim of zero emission is maximum resource productivity and virtually no waste. To reach this goal the technologies and processes must be improved. This can be approached in a number of ways: by technological innovation, pollution prevention, cleaner production, by-product synergy, etc. All of these are ways of eliminating or minimazing all kind of emission, while preventing to cause harm to the environment and human health. It is proven, and there are numerous examples, that it can be a profitable goal. Creating a zero emission industry is a great chalenge for EU. It enables sustainable development, a safe present and a safe future. At the same time it reduces significantly our energy and material resources. This way makes us less input dependent. In the EU there are many examples of good practice in these fields. During the realisation of the previous Tempus project JEP_19020 the coordinator, UNS had the opportunity to see many attractive solutions. Some of them were in Belgium and Sweeden, but the most impressing was the one seen in Germany while visiting the Environmental zero emission campus. A similar solution exists in Rhineland-Palatinum. Introducing the concept of zero energy and material flow, there were examples of totally energy independent communities. For WB countries it is of a great interest to be as possible closer to this trend. It is obvious that in the future this kind of activities will be very intensive. EU and WB will need many experts in this fields. The staff from the industry, primarly engineers and mangement stuff, but also the others must have new knowledge in order to handle this problem. Progress of the Project activities over time


36

First year Creation on the website After the the first Management meeting the website will be created. The coordinator will be in charge of this task. The presentation of the consortium members as well as as the planned activities for the first year will be put on the site. Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses This will be done during the visits of experts from EU. It is planned to have a meeting with reprsentatives from industry and the Chamber of commerce. Workshops will be held on Screening and analizing the status of knowledge in industry concerning sustainability. Re-training of WB staff from partner universities in EU and creating the first course scheme A retraining and updating session for one week for 2 staff members of each of the 6 partner universities will be organised. Each retraining session will be structured according to the following framework: 1. Experience with enterprise-universitiy cooperation 2. State of the industries concerning sustainabilty 3. Pratical examples of zero emission industries 4. Lectures concerning the topics of the course 5. Teaching methods for adults 6. First course scheme In BE the following agenda will be followed 1. Sustainable industry and society 2. Management of sustainability 3. EU LLL policy 4. State of the industries concerning sustainabilty in BE 5. Experience with enterprise-universitiy cooperation in BE 6. Examples of zero emission industries in BE 7. Experience in LLL and teaching methods for adults 8. First course scheme In GE the following agenda will be followed 1. Zero emission concept 2. Material flow management 3. Experience with enterprise-universitiy cooperation in GE 4. State of the industries concerning sustainabilty in GE 5. Examples of zero emission industries in GE Case studies 6. Experience with LLL and taching methods for adults 7. First course scheme In AT the following agenda will be followed 1. Environmental protection and energy efficiency 2. Zero energy emission technologies 3. Zero waste in air 4. Experience with enterprise-university cooperation in AT 5. State of the industries concerning sustainabilty in AT 6. Examples of zero energy emission technologies Case studies 7. Experience with LLL and teaching methods for adults 8. First course scheme Second year Course development It is planned to create 4 courses with the following common topics: 1. Concept of sustainability related to society, especially industry 2. Zero emission technologies


37

3. Material and energy flow management in industry 4. Case studies 5. Zero emission of material or/and energy in selected industry. All 4 courses will have the same first 4 topics. The 5th topic will be tailored to the specific needs of the industry it will be created for. ECTS 6 Workload: 150 hours Duration of courses: 3 - 4 months Target group Staff from the industry. In each course up to10 participants. After the retraing and updating sessions in EU the staff from the partner unvrsities will do the exact structure of curricula., The workload is planned to be about 150 hours which corresponds to 6 ECTS credits At the 1st Workshop the following will be defined. 1. The exact structure of the 4 courses 2. Division of tasks beetwen 6 partner universities The first 4 topics will be diveded equally beetwen partner universities. The 5th topic will be written separately by each partner country. 3. Teaching method definition and division beetwen theoretical, practical classes, self-conducted learning and case studies. Afterwards the staff members of the partner universities will start the course development. In the middle of the course development The 2nd five-day Workshop will be organised with EU experts. During this workshop emphasis will be put on: • Follow-up of agreements of Workshop 1 • Obstacles that were met during course writing • Name the experts for written material revision. The 3rd Workshop will be held at the very start of the third year. At this Workshop: • The created courses will be presented • The results of written materal revision will be present • The exact dates of the courses and • The way of evaluation of the courses will be defined. Third year In this year the courses will be held in all 6 partner universities. Involving the trainees The first trainees will be from industry, which is a non-university partner in the Project. After the end of the courses in the Chamber of Commerce the results of the courses will be presented to the representativs from industries. The aim is to dissiminate the results and to attract new trainees for the next year. On the base of the course evaluation, if ecessary, the courses will be modified. It is planned to have 6 courses, at each partner university one. Actually 4 basically different courses will be offered, one for each country. Dissemination booklet writing During the second half of the third year a dissemination booklet will be written and will be presented towards the end of the third year. The booklet has to present the goals of the Project its activities and the results as well as the plans for the future i.e. for the postproject period Pedagogical methodology The methodology will be based on EU’s strategy principle of working together and learning from each other. This principle will be applied in creating the courses and in defining the pedagogical methodology. The principle of good practice exchange and Peer learning will also be adopted. The workload of the course will be taken into account: Contact hours Introductory lectures Peer learning activities Practice Reworking hours and self-conducting learning


38

The scheme of the course will be built up on the following 6 types of activities: Activity 1: Lectures Introduction Presentation of the content of the course and working practices Lectures of experts from the Partner universities Dividing the tasks in order to have peer teaching at the following lesson Activity 2: Lectures Topic A Introductory lecture Expert – systematic presentation on of the topic that is aimed to be covered Lectures of trainees Trainees – what they know about the same topic Conclusions and tasks to be solved for the following lesson Experts and trainees – how to get answers Activity 3 Reworking hours and self-conducted learning Activity 4: Lectures and practice Topic A Answering the questions of the previous lesson Activities 3 and 4 To be repeated as many time as many topics are to be covered Activity 5: Workshops Summarizing the course and the trainees` presentations Activity 6: Examination Appliances needed for the courses: Computers, video beams, printers, laptops, copy machines, certain software, instruments for energy and material flow measuring and literature. Involvment of academics, students and stakeholders at large Writing the course material and giving course lectures Academics from partner universities Course material evaluation Non-consortium experts, from other universities Giving course lectures To trainees from industry. It is planned to involve at least 7 different enterprises with about 70 trainees. Course evaluation By trainees from industry. Preparing the strategy for potential trainees from industry for whom the course will be held Chamber of commerce and Academics from the partner universities Meeting with potential trainees Chamber of commerce, Academics from the partner universities, representatives from industry Quality assurance processes The partners want to give a course of high quality based on the common experience of EU and the partner universities. A person from EU partner university, will be in charge of the internal quality assurance process. The external expert will have his own evaluation of the whole work. Dissemination of the results of the Project The schedule and the exact plan of the dissemination will be done on the first coordination meeting. It will include: • Presentation of the results on the website of the Project • Articlesr


39

• Presentation of the results of the activities in the media • Presentation of the results of the Project at each of the Universityies • Presentation of the results of the Project at the Chamber of Commerce • Presentation of the results of the Project by flyers and CDs • Presentation of the results of the Project at workshops The results will be continuously presented throughout the whole Project Assurance of the sustainability of the Project outcomes At the end of the Project a final meeting will be organized where the results will be presented to the representatives from industry. The concept of sustainable and zero emission industry as well as the experience from the previous courses will be presented as well. The trainees from the previous course will be also present on this meeting. The aim of this meeting is to attract new trainees. A systematic plan of the courses to be offered to industry will be elaborated in cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce. The offer of the courses to industry will be planned systematically in cooperation with the Chamber of commerce. General project management KaHo Sint-Lieven will act as "grant applicant institution" and the University from Novi Sad as "grant coordinator". The two universities had good experience during the previous Tempus project 19020. In project management it is very important for each consortium partner to have a subcoordinator who takes care not only of the follow up of the but also of all administrative and financial issues. In project management one of the critical success factors is the organisation of planning and evaluation meetings on a regular basis. Therefore a four-day meeting will be held every six months in order to ensure the smooth running of the project. Not only the follow-up of the contents finances and administration, but also evaluation will be discussed on every occasion. Therefore the external quality expert will also be invited to every planning and evaluation meeting. Convergence with EU higher education policies European strategy and co-operation in education and training states that “Education and training are essential to the development and success of today's knowledge, society and economy. The EU's strategy emphasizes countries working together and learning from each other.” The Strategy also states that „High quality of higher and vocational education and training remain as important as ever. But initial learning is not enough. People's skills must be constantly renewed to enable them to meet the challenges of ever-evolving technologies, increasing internationalisation and demographic changes. Nowadays, lifelong learning is key to jobs and growth, as well as to allow everyone the chance to participate fully in society.“ Moreover, in the Tempus call it is stated that „With regards to the Western Balkans, the future Tempus programme will contribute to preparing the pre-accession countries for their participation in the Lifelong Learning programme.” Priorities Regional priorites for WB Higher Education and society • Development of partnership with enterprises


40

III.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES, OUTCOMES AND ACTIVITIES (LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

MATRIX – LFM) In order to plan and structure the project’s objectives, outcomes and activities as thoroughly as possible, you are expected to complete an LFM (maximum of 2 pages), which represents a synthesis of the project. The LFM is a tool which provides an overview of the project and can assist in the design, planning, implementation and moni-toring of a project. Please use the table provided further below. Details provided in the table should complement the information previously explained in the project narrative (section III.2). In addition to the project overview, which summarises the objectives and activities in the first column, you are requested to provide details on other aspects, such as indicators of progress, risks and assumptions.

Wider objective:

Give an indication of the medium / long-term aim to which the project is designed to contribute.

Example: To ensure that the targeted Partner Country university is in a position to offer education which is targeted towards the changing needs of the economic environment.

Project-specific objectives:

State the specific objectives of the project. The specific objectives should indicate what is expected to have been achieved by the end of the project. The objective of your project should be “SMART”: Specific, Measurable, Accurate, Realistic and Time-bound.

Example: To bring undergraduate curricula, teaching methods and library facilities at the Faculty of Economics of the University of xxx into line with the Bologna requirements by December xxx.

Outcomes - Outputs:

The outcomes and outputs to be produced during the project implementation should be listed in concrete terms. They should be logically linked to each other and, once again, they should be specific, realistic in relation to the duration of the project and measurable in so far as this is possible. Producing all planned outcomes and outputs will mean that the project objectives have been attained as planned.

Assign reference numbers for each outcome and each output. These will be needed for the work plan (section III.4)

Outputs are tangible and outcomes are rather intangible.

An output (tangible) could be, for instance, newly developed teaching materials for the MSc degree in Management & Business.

An outcome (intangible) could be, for example, all the experience gained in a project such as skills of management of trans-national partnerships, methods with which the final products were developed or methodologies used.

Activities:

The achievement of an outcome/output implies the completion of a set of related activities. Indicate which ac-tivities are planned to achieve each outcome/output.

Assign subordinate reference numbers for each activity (see above). These will be needed for the work plan.


41

Inputs:

Inputs should be expressed in terms of the human resources, equipment, materials and travel considered neces-sary to perform the activities intended to produce the desired outcomes/outputs.

Example: Two librarians from D to UKR for 3 weeks (costs of stay and travel costs); 1 part-time secre-tary in the co-ordinating consortium member for 6 months (staff costs); 5 computers, 2 printers at benefi-ciary university (equipment).

Inputs should be appropriate and sufficient to undertake the planned activities.

Indicators of progress:

These are the “sign-posts” that will be used to measure the performance of the project throughout its life-cycle. These preliminary indicators are likely to be reviewed or supplemented by more specific indicators once a pro-ject is operational.

Indicators should be specific in terms of quantity, quality, time and target group.

Indicators provide a basis for the monitoring of the project’s progress and should therefore be considered as an ongoing evaluation mechanism within the project.

Assumptions and risks:

Please mention in this section any factors (that is, situations, events, conditions or decisions) which are neces-sary for the success of the project activities, outcomes or objectives, but which are not directly under the control of the partnership. You should see these as situations or events that you think might occur. The more these situa-tions/events are beyond the control of the partnership the higher the risk which is posed to the project if they occur.

Example: That accreditation of the new curriculum might not be granted by the national authorities.

For those identified risks, which are internal to the partnership, such as for example lack of EU language skills of partner country university staff, lack of interest from students, lack of time of university teaching staff, the partnership should foresee and indicate in the application means and activities to counter-act these risks.


42

III.3 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX – LFM

Wider Objective: What is the overall broader objective, to which the project will contribute?

Improving the university-eneterprise cooperation on sustainable development in the industry of WB partner countries according to EU standards

Indicators of progress: What are the key indicators related to the wider objec-tive?

Acceptance of the new course programmes for Improving the level of knowledge of the staff from tindustry by the participating enterprises; Implementation of the new developed courses for the staff from industry.

How indicators will be measured: What are the sources of information on these indica-tors?

New developed courses on sustainable industry are held to the staff from industry Number of requests for the new developed courses

Specific Project Objective/s: What are the specific objectives, which the project shall achieve?

•To bring new curricula on sustainable industry for the staff from industries involved in the project; •To bring an expirience from EU partners on sustainable industry in new developed curricula; •To bring the knowledge of the staff from industry closer to the standards in EU partner countries; •To bring the strategy for education of the staff from the industry on sustainble industry issue.

Indicators of progress: What are the quantitative and qualitative indicators showing whether and to what extent the project’s spe-cific objectives are achieved?

New developed curricula for the industry; Part of the curricula based on EU expiriences; Examine the knowledge the staff from industry after the courses; Strategy for education of the staff from industry on sustainable development.

How indicators will be measured: What are the sources of information that exist and can be collected? What are the methods required to get this information?

Curricula reviewed; :Part of the curricula based on EU expirience reviewed; . Results from the examinations; . Implementation of the strategy

Assumptions & risks: What are the factors and conditions not under the direct control of the project, which are necessary to achieve these objectives? What risks have to be consid-ered? Political and economiccal stability in the region; Lack of interest the staff from industry in the offered courses; Lack of interest of Governments to adopt the EU standards in WB countries

Outputs (tangible) and Outcomes (intan-gible): Please provide the list of concrete outputs/outcomes leading to the specific objective/s, using bullet points, considering the following questions for their definition: What are the envisaged quantifiable and non-quantifiable effects and benefits of the project? What improvements and changes will be produced by the project?

•1. Review and analyse the exsisting knowledge of the staff from industry on sustainable industry issue; •2. Retrain the staff from WB partner univiersities in BE, GE and AT; •3. Develop new curricula for the staff from industry of RS, BA and MK on

Indicators of progress: What are the indicators to measure whether and to what extent the project achieves the envisaged results and effects?

1. Report ofthe level of knowledge of the staff from industry concerning sustainable industry issue; 2. Report of retraining and updating sessions in EU for the WB partner university staff; 3. Written material of new developed curricula; 4. Report of holding the course; 5. Expirience gained through course

How indicators will be measured: What are the sources of information on these indica-tors?

Numbers of reports of the level of knowledge of the staff from industry concerning sustainable industry issue; Numbers of reports from retraining and updating sessions in EU for the WB partner university staff; Number of written material of new developed curricula; Trainee’s evaluation scheme implemented; Numbers of reports of holding the

Assumptions & risks: What external factors and conditions must be realised to obtain the expected outcomes and results on sched-ule?

Willingnes of the staff from industry to evaluate their knowledge on sustainable industry issue Willingnes of the staff from industry to cooperate during reviewing and analysing the exisating knowledge of the staff from industry on sustainable industry issue Lack of interest to create new curricula on sustainable industry from the enterprises managaments; Lack of interest of other universities and


43

sustainable industry issue; •4. Implement the new developed curricula for the staff from industry •5.Increase the link with enterprises •6. Increase the links beetwen WB partner country univirsites; •7. Increase the link between WB partner country universities and EU country universities : •8. Dissemination; •9. Sustainability; •10.Quality control and monitoring; •11 Management of the project.

cooperation on the creation of curricula; 6. Expirience gained through course cooperation on the creation of curricula; 7. Experience gained through course cooperation on the creation of curricula;: 8.1 Informative website; 8.2 Leaflets and promotional materials; 8.3 Disemination confrences to the staff from universities and industry not involved in the project; 8.4 Workshops; 8.5 Information through media to the whole communit 9.1 Offering the courses to industry planning to be held after the end of the project; 9.2 Organisation of similar courses after the end of the project; 10.1 Internal evaluation process positively completed; 10.2 Elaboration of annual quality evaluation report of the external expert; 11.1 Consortium meetings held on schedule 11.2 Submitted project reports to the EU

course; Numbers of leaflets and promotional materials disseminated; Number of recipients of the reports; Reports on project activities; Number of participiants in discussion groups, workshops and conferences; Number of trainees enrolled in retraing courses for the staff from industries; Reports of external and internal evaluation; Minutes of consortium meetings.,

indusries in dissemination activities; A change in mentality for taking more care of environmental protection can take a lot of time.

Activities: What are the key activities to be carried out and in what sequence in order to produce the expected re-sults?

1.1 To invetorize and analyze the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses; 1.2 Short visits of EU experts to WB partner univesities; 2.1 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in BE; 2.2 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in GE; 2.3 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in AT;

Inputs: What inputs are required to implement these activities, e.g. staff time, equipment, mobilities, publications etc.?

OUTPUT 1 Staff: 75 days partner 2, 50 days partner 5 , 40 days partner 6, 40 days partner 7, 40 days partner 8, 40 days partner 9, 5 days partner 1; 5 days partner 3; 5 days partner 4. Mobility: 12 flows (average 7 days each) EU > PC. Eqipmenr: books. OUTPUT 2 Staff. 7 days partner 1; 7 days partner 3; 7 days partner 4.

Assumptions, risks and pre-conditions: What pre-conditions are required before the project starts? What conditions outside the project’s direct control have to be present for the implementation of the planned activities?

A well structured cooperation beetwen the EU expert and the professors from the partner countries; Attractivness of new developed courses Convinction of the partners that dissemination must start from the beginning Willingnes to cooperate after the end of the project Availability of the staff from industry to accept the course contentens


44

3.1 Course development Workshop 1; 3.2 Course development Workshop 2; 3.3 Developing the courses and writimg the teaching material; 3.4 Expert's evaluation of the teaching material on sustainable industry, 3.5 Course development Workshop 3: Presentation of the courses; 3.6 Equipping the Training Laboratory 4.1 Courses held for the staff from industry 5.1 Cooperation on tailoring the courses to the needs of the industry; 6.1 Cooperation beetwen WB partner universities during project’s objective realisation 7.1 Cooperation beetwe EU and WB partners during project’s objective realisation; 8.1 Development of the project website; 8.2 Organisation of the dissemination conferences; 8.3 Publications and presentations of the project results 8.4 Dissemination booklet writing 9.1 Creation the Strategic Plan for education on sustainable industry in cooperation with Chambers of commerce 9.2 Cooperation agreement beetwen WB partner universities and enterprises; 9.3 Agreement of creation of university-enterprise cooperation networks for education on sustainable technologies; 10.1 Elaboration of internal quality evaluation report; 10.2 Elaboration of external quality evaluation report; 10.3 Final report; 11.1 General project management; 11.2 Planning and evaluation meeting.

Mobility: 48 flows (average 7 days each) PC > EU Printing: materials for lecture. OUTPUT 3 Staff. 30 days partner 1; 337 days partner 2; 15 days partner 3; 15 days partner 4; 315 days partner 5; 255 days partner 6;. 255 days partner 7; 255 days partner 8; 255 days partner 9; 25 days partner 23; 25 days partner 24. Mobilty: 14 flows (5 day each) EU>PC; 14 flows (5 days each) PC>PC; 3 flows within a PC (5 day each). Equipment: servers, computers, software for simualation, Netsupport school software, videobeam, printer, copy machine, laptop, laboratory equipmet. Printing: course books printing and electronic design OUTPUT 4 Staff: 30 days part-ner 2; days partner 3; 30 days partner 4; 30 days partner 5; 30 days partner 6;. 30 days partner 7; 30 days partner 8; 30 days partner 9. OUTCOME 8 Staff: 4 days partner 1; 40 days partner 2;.10 days partner 5; 10 days partner 6; 10 days partner 7; 10 days partner 8; 10 days partner 9. Mobilty: 6 flows (4 day each) EU>PC; 5 flows (4 day each) PC>PC) and 1 within PC (4 day) Equipment: servers and web software Priniting: Dissemination booklet; Flyers, CD's. Other: English language revision.. OUTPUT 9 Staff: 7 days partner 2 Printing: leaflets OUTPUT 10 Staff: 15 days parner 3 ; 36 days partner

Iinterest of teachers and trainees to take part in the courset Language skills Administrative problems in Partner countries


45

23 EU individual expert; 36 partner 24 EU individual expert. Mobilty: 18 flows (7 days each) OUTPUT 11 Staff: 100 days partner 1; 210 days partner 2; 5 days partner 3; 5 days partner 5; 25 days partner 5; 25 days partner 6; 25 days partner 7; 25 days partner 8; 25 days partner 9. Other costs: bank transfer, costs for bying visa. Mobility: 14 flows (4 deays each) EU>EU; 21 flows (4 days each) PC>EU; 24 flows (4 deay each) EU>PC; 24 flows (4 day each) PC>PC; 4 flows within PC (


46

III.4 WORKPLAN Please use the model provided. Applicants are expected to complete a one-page work plan for each project year. For each year of your project proposal, please complete a work plan indicating the deadlines for each outcome and the period and location in which your activities will take place. Please create additional work plan tables if further space is needed. The same reference and sub-reference numbers as used in the logical framework matrix must be assigned to each outcome and related activities. M1 = first month of the project year; 12 M = 1 year; 4 weeks = 1 M. Please use one symbol (= / X) to represent one week.

WORKPLAN for 1st project year Activities

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 Ref. N° /Sub Ref. N°

Title

1.1 To inventoryse and analyze the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses

OX X X X X XO

1.2 Short visit of EU experts to WB partner universities O= =O 2.1 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in BE O=O 2.2 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in GE O=O 2.3 Retraining and updating of WB university staff in AT O=O 8.1 Development of the project website O=X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X 8.2 Organization of the dissemination conferences OX XO 8.3 Publications and presentations of the project results OX XO

10.1 Elaboration of internal quality report O=O 10.2 Elaboration of external quality evaluation reports O=O 11.1 General project managament O=X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X 11.2 Planning and evaluation meeting in Gent and Novi Sad O=O OXO

\

WORKPLAN for 2nd project year


47

Activities M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 Ref. N°

/Sub Ref. N° Title

3.1 Course development workshop 1 Skopje OXO 3.2 Course development workshop 2 Tuzla OXO 3.3 Developing the courses and course teaching material writing OX X X X X X X X X X XO 3.4 Expets evaluation of the teaching material on sustainable ibdustry O= =O 3.6 Equipping the Training Laboratory OX X XO 5.1 Cooperation on tailoring the courses to the needs of the industry OX X X X X X X X X X X X 6.1 Cooperation beetwen WB partner universities during project’s ob-

jective realisation OX X X X X X X X X X X X

7.1 Cooperation beetwen EU and WB partners during project’s objec-tive realisation

O=X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X =X

8.1 Development of the project website X X X X X X X X X X X X 8.2 Organization of the dissemination conferences OXO OXO 8.3 Publication and presentation of the project results OXO OXO

10.1 Elaboration of internal quality report O=O 10.2 Elaboration of external quality evaluation reports O=O 11.1 General project managament X X X X X X X X X X X X 11.2 Planning and evaluation meeting in Birkenfeld and Skopje O=O OXO


48

WORKPLAN for 3rd project year

Activities M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 Ref. N°

/Sub Ref. N° Title

3.5 Course development workshop 3,:Novi Sad OXO 4.1 Course hold for the staff from industry OX X X X XO 8.1 Development of the project website X X X X X X X X X X X X 8.2 Organization of the dissemination conference OXO 8.3 Publication and presentation of the project results OXO 8.4 Dissemination booklet writing OX X X X XO 9.1 Creation the Strategic Plan for education on sustainable industry in

cooperation with Chambers of commercies OX X X X XO

9,2 Cooperation agreement beetwen WB partner universities and en-terprises

OXO

9.3 Agreement of creation of unicersity/enterprise cooperation net-works for education on sustainable technologies

OXO

10.1 Elaboration of internal quality report O=O 10.2 Elaboration of external quality evaluation reports O=O 10.3 Final report OXO 11.1 General project managament X X X X X X X X X X X X 11.2 Planning and evaluation meeting in Vienna, Tuzla and Novi Sad O=O OXO OXO


49

Starting and end date of Outcome: O Activity carried out in the EU/Candidate Country: = Activity carried out in the Partner Country (ies): X


50

III.5 OUTCOME & ACTIVITY TABLES

The outcome tables enable you to give precise details on each expected outcome and the related activities. You should also provide details on the resources needed for each outcome. Please create additional tables if further space is needed. The following types of information will be required:

Please fill in the same title and reference number for each outcome as provided in the Logical Framework Matrix.

Please include assumptions and risks for each outcome where relevant. Please provide a representative title for each activity together with a sub-reference number, starting and end-

ing date. An adequate description of each activity; what will be done, when, where and how. The partner/s or experts who will carry out an activity should be stated, specifying which staff from which

of the partners will be responsible for and carry out each single activity (e.g.: Senior administrative staff from university A; the rectorate of university B; finance officers from institution C; quality control staff from institution D, etc.). It is not sufficient to merely list some (or all) partners.

For each activity a target group must be clearly identified. A target group is composed of the direct benefi-ciaries of the activity and could typically include one or more of the following: Academic staff of a given department, university administrative staff, students, trainees participating in a training course, etc. Please quantify your target group and state precisely who they are and where they are located (e.g.: 5 librarians of university A; 20 secondary school teachers, 25 students from the institutions B, C and D; 10 administrators at the Ministry of Education; etc.). This is particularly important for projects in which several Partner Coun-try institutions are involved.

All the resources (financial, human, material) needed to execute an activity must be described in the “Input” row. The information provided should be specified and itemised. For staff costs please provide information on the type of staff , where they come from and what the hourly rates are (e.g.: x academic staff from EU in-stitution A multiplied by x hours multiplied by x Euro). In case of staff and student mobilities, you must in-dicate the number of people, the direction and duration of each of the mobilities (e.g.: 5 PC staff to EU insti-tution A for B number of weeks). For equipment, you should quantify and describe the equipment needed for each activity (e.g.: 15 computers and 1 network printer).

For each outcome you should indicate the types of expenditures that will be necessary by filling in the “re-lated costs” table at the end of this section. You should not duplicate expenditure under more than one out-come, as the sum of the total budget required for each outcome should correspond to the totals indicated in Section V, Table 8, ‘Summary of project funding requirements’.

Overheads should be accounted for only once, under the outcomes and activities table for ‘Management of the Project’.

For Dissemination and Sustainability, Quality Control and Monitoring, and Management of the Project, you must also provide a description of the strategy you will adopt


51


52

Outcome/output title:

Develop new curricula for the staff from industry of RS, BA and MK Ref. N°: 3

Starting date: Y2/M1 (15/01/2011) End date: Y2/M12 (15/12/2011)

Related Assump-tions

and risks:

Lack of interest to create a new curricula on sustainable industry from the enterprise man-agement

Activity title: Course development workshop 1 Sub Ref. N°: 3.1


Description of the activity:

It is planned to create 4 courses with the following planned common topics: 1. Concept of sustainability related to society, and especially industry 2. Zero emission technologies 3. Material and energy flow management in industry 4. Case studies 5. Zero emission of material or/and energy in selected industry. All 4 courses will have the same first 4 topics. The 5th topic will be tailored to the specific needs of the industry to whom it wiil be created. The planned ECTS: 6, Workload: 150 hours and Du-ration of courses: 3 - 4 months. The exact structure and the content of the curricula will be done on the workshop 1. On this workshop the following planned agenda will be followed: Report on Review and analyse the existing knowledge of the staff from industry on sus-

tainable industry issue in the partner countries Reports on retraining and updating of WB partner universities in BE, GE and AT Summary of the previous work Proposal for curricala structure and common content Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be

held Defining the teaching method for trainees – the staff from industry Division beetwen theoretical, practical classes, self-conducted learning and case studies. Dividing the tasks among partner universtites concerning course writing Defining the deadlines for the tasks for the next workshop The 5 days Workshop 1 wil be organised in Skopje at the beginning of the second year.


53

The consortium member/s or ex-

perts who will carry out the activity:

The leader of the working group will be: Zoltan Zavargo, University of Novi Sad, RS

The working group will include: 11 members are planned to be in the working group.. 7 (seven) members from partner country universities (3 RS, 2 BA, 2 MK) and .4 staff from EU (2 BE, 1 GE and 1 AT).

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS):: a) Co-coordination b) Summary of the previous work c) Report on Inven-

torizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses. d) Proposal for curricala structure and common content e) Proposal for specific top-ics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held f) Consulting g) De-fining the tasks among partner country universities h) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2.

PCU-Niš (RS),. a) Report on Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses. b) Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held c) Consulting d) Defining the tasks among partner country universities e) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2

PCU-Tuzla (BA) a) Report on Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses. b) Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held c) Consulting d) Defining the tasks among partner country universities e) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2

PCU-ISarajevo (BA) a) Report on Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in in-dustry regarding the topics of the courses. b) Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held c) Consulting d) Defining the tasks among partner country universities e) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2

PCU-Skopje (MK) a) Organising the workshop b) Report on Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses. c) Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held d) Consulting e) Defining the tasks among partner country universities f) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2

PCU-Štip (MK): a) Report on Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses. b) Proposal for specific topics tailored for the need of the industry to whom the course will be held c) Consulting d) Defining the tasks among partner country universities e) Defining the deadlines: tasks is to be finished by the next 4 months till the next Workshop 2

EU: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) coordination b) consulting; Trier University of Applied Sciences (GE): a) consulting; Vienna university of Technology (AT) a) consulting.

Target group/s: Staff members EU and Partner countriy universities

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 2 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 5 days x 40 € = 400 €; 1 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 5 days x 40 € = 200 € 1 Tuzla university acad. staff (BA) x 5 days x 64 € = 320 €; 1 University of Istočno Sarajevo acad. staff x 5 days x 64€ = 320 € 1 University of Ss. Cyril and Metohdius acad. staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 €; University Goce Delcev acad. staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 € 2 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven acad. staff. x 5 days x 240 € = 2400 €;1 Trier University of Applied Science acad. staff x 5 days x 240 € = 1200 €; 1 Vienna university of Technology acad. staff x 5 days x 240 = 1200 € Mobility inputs Costs of stay: 9 stays x 718 € = 6462 € (4 EU + 5 PCU); 1 stay x 360 € = 360 € (1 MK) Costs of travel: 3 flows (RS - MK) x 200 € = 600 €; 2 flows (BA - MK) x 200 € = 400 €; 1 flows (MK – MK) x 100 € = 100 €; 4 flows (EU – MK) x 500€ = 2000 €


54

Activity title: Course development workshop 2 Sub Ref. N°: 3.2



On this workshop the professors from the partner countries will evaluate together with EU ex-perts the progress in course development. On this workshop the following planned agenda will be followed:

Follow-up of agreements made during workshop 1 Presentation of each PCU regarding the course writing that was agreed What obstacles occurred during the course writing ? Defining the final course structure and content Deadline for the course writing finalisation: middle of October 2011. Defining the experts for written material revision Deadline for internal review: middle of November 2011. Deadline for corrections: middle of December 2011.

The 5 days Workshop 2 wil be organised in Tuzla at the middle of june in the second year.




The working group will include: 11 members are planned to be in the working group.. 7 members from partner country universities (3 RS, 2 BA, 2 MK) and .4 staff from EU (2 BE, 1 GE and 1 AT).

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS):: a) Co-coordination b) Follow-up of agreements made during workshop

1 c) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done d) Defining the final course structure and content e) Defining the experts for written material revision f) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and written material finalisation. g) Consult-ing.

PCU-Niš (RS): a) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done b) Defin-ing the final course structure and content c) Defining the experts for written material revision d) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and written material finalisation. e) Consult-ing

PCU-Tuzla (BA): a) Organisation of the Workshop b) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done c) Defining the final course structure and content d) Defining the experts for written material revision e) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and writ-ten material finalisation. f) Consulting

PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done b) Defining the final course structure and content c) Defining the experts for written material revision d) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and written material finalisation. e) Consulting

PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done b) Defining the final course structure and content c) Defining the experts for written material revision d) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and written material finalisation. e) Consulting

PCU-Štip (MK):a) Presentation regarding the course writing that was agreed to be done b) De-fining the final course structure and content c) Defining the experts for written material revi-sion d) Defining the deadlines for internal revisions and written material finalisation. e) Con-sulting

EU: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) coordinator b) consulting; Trier University of Applied Sciences (GE): a) consulting; Vienna university of Technology (AT) a) consulting.

Target group/s: Staff members EU and Partner country universities


55

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 2 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 5 days x 40 € = 400 €); 1 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 5 days x 40 € = 200 € 1 Tuzla university acad. staff (BA) x 5 days x 64 € = 320 €; 1 University of Istočno Sarajevo acad. staff x 5 days x 64€ = 320 € 1 University of Ss. Cyril and Metodhius acad. Staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 €; University Goce Delcev acad. staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 € 2 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven acad. staff. x 5 days x 240 € = 2400 €; Trier University of Applied Science acad. staff x 5 days x 240 € = 1200 €; Vienna university of Technology, acad. staff x 5 days x 240 = 1200 € Mobility inputs Costs of stay: 9 stays x 718 € = 6462 € (4 EU + 5 PCU); 1 stay x 360 € = 360 € (1 BA) Costs of travel: 3 flows (RS - BA) x 100 € = 300 €; 2 flows (MK - BA) x 200 € = 400 €; 1 flow (BA - BA) x 100 € = 100 €; 4 flows (EU – BA) x 500€ = 2000 €


56

Activity title: Developing the courses and course teaching material writing Sub Ref. N°: 3.3



In this activity the RS, BA, MK staff members will actively develop all new courses on sus-tainable industry. Four (4) different course teaching materials will be developed. It is planned that the first 4 topics of the teachning material will be the same and the fifth will be created and written to the needs of the industry to whom the course will be held. 1. Concept of sustainability related to society, and especially industry 2. Zero emission technologies 3. Material and energy flow management in industry 4. Case studies 5. Zero emission of material or/and energy in selected industry. The final structure and content of the courses will be defined on Workshop 1 and Workshop 2 together with EU country experts. The teaching material will be written during the second year. of the project by all PCU acad. staff.




The working group will include: 18 members are planned to be in the working group (3 from each PCU: 6 RS, 6 BA and 6 MK).

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS): a) Co-coordination b) Concept of sustainability b) Zero emission tech-

nologies c) Zero emission of energy d) Case studies e) Consulting. PCU-Niš (RS): a) Concept of sustainability b) Zero emission technologies c) Zero emission of

material d) Case studies e) Consulting PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Concept of sustainability b) Material and energy flow managament c) Zero

emission of energy d) Case studies e) Consulting PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Concept of sustainability b) Zero emission technologies c) Zero emis-

sion of materials d) Case studies e) Consulting PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Concept of sustainability b) Material flow management c) Zero emission

of material d) Case studies e) Consulting PCU-Štip (MK): a) Concept of sustainability b) Material flow management c) Zero emission of

material d) Case studies e) Consulting

Target group/s: Staff members of Partner country universities

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 3 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 100 days x 40 € =12000 €); 3 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 100 days x 40 € = 12000 €; 3 Univesity of Tuzla acad. staff (BA) x 80 days x 64 € = 15360 €; 1 University of Istočno Sara-jevo acad. staff x 80 days x 64€ =15360 € 3 University of St. Kiril and Metodij acad. Staff (MK) x 80 days x 76 € = 18240 €; 3 University of Štip acad. staff (MK) x 30 days x 76 € =18240 € Printing costs Printing of course books: 6 PCU x 300 € =1800 € Electronic design: 7 days x 35€ = 245 €


57

Activity title: Evaluation of the course teaching material Sub Ref. N°: 3.4



The planned 4 written teaching materials will be evaluated by the expert which were defined at the Workshop 2. The 4 courses will be evaluated during the last month of the second year. The result of the eval-uations will be presented on the Workshop 3, which will be held at the beginning of the third year.



EU individual experts

Target group/s: PCU staff: authors of the written materials

Inputs: Staff inputs: 1 EUindividual expert, Corvinus university (HU) x 20days x 90 € =1800 € 2 EU individual expert Wroclaw university of Technology (PL) x 20 days x 105 € = 2100 €


58

Activity title: Course development Workshop 3 Sub Ref. N°: 3.5



On this workshop all the PCU will present their courses, before it is to be held to the staff from industry.The agenda will be as follows: Presentations of the created courses from each PCU Presentation the courses exact timetable Presentation the results of written material evaluation by the EU expert Feedback from the trainees: Definition of the way of evaluation the courses teaching materi-

als, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees. The workshop will be held at the beginning of the third year in PCU Novi Sad, the whole work will be presented before the start of the courses. This will be the opportunity to present the courses and to synchronise the further activities in order to ensure the smooth courses helding. It is, also the last chance to correct something if it is necessary.




The working group will include: 13 members are planned to be in the working group: 7 from PCU (2 from Home Institution-Novi Sad, and 1 from each other PCU (3 RS, 2 BA, 2 MK), .4 staff from EU (2 BE, 1 GE and 1 AT). and 2 EU individual experts.

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS): a ) Organisation the Workshop b) Co-coordination c) Presentation the

created courses d) Presentation the courses exact timetable e) Definition the way of evaluation the courses, teaching materials, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees f) Consulting.

PCU-Niš (RS): a) Presentation the created courses b) Presentation the courses exact timetable c) Definition the way of evaluation the courses, teaching materials, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees d) Consulting

PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Presentation the created courses b) Presentation the courses exact timetable c) Definition the way of evaluation the courses, teaching materials, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees d) Consulting

PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Presentation the created courses b) Presentation the courses exact timetable c) Definition the way of evaluation the courses teaching materials, teaching meth-ods and teachers by the trainees d) Consulting.

PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Presentation the created courses b) Presentation the courses exact timet-able c) Definition the way of evaluation the courses teaching materials, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees d) Consulting

PCU-Štip (MK): a) Presentation the created courses b) Presentation the courses exact timetable c) Definition the way of evaluation the courses teaching materials, teaching methods and teachers by the trainees d) Consulting:

EU: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) coordination b) consulting;. Trier University of Applied Sciences (GE): a) consulting; Vienna university of Technology (AT) a) consult-ing.

EU individual experts: Corvinus university (HU): a) Teaching material evaluation; Wroclaw university of Technology (PL) a) Teaching material revision

Target group/s: PCU staff, EU staff and EU individual experts.


59

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 2 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 5 days x 40 € =400 €); 1 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 5 days x 40 € = 200 € 1 Tuzla university acad. staff (BA) x 5 days x 64 € = 320 €; 1 University of Istočno Sarajevo acad. staff x 5 days x 64€ = 320 € 1 University of Ss.Cyril and Methodius acad. Staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 €; University Goce Delcev acad. staff (MK) x 5 days x 76 € =380 € 2 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven acad. staff. x 5 days x 240 € = 2400 €; 1 Trier University of Applied Science acad. staff x 5 days x 240 € = 1200 €; 1 Vienna university of Technology, acad. staff x 5 days x 240 = 1200 €; Corvinus University – EU individual expert x 5 days x 90 € = 450 €; Wroclaw university – EU individual expert x 5 days x 105€ = 525 € Mobility inputs Costs of stay: 10 stays x 718 € = 7180 € (4 EU + 4 PCU + 2 EU experts); 1 stay x 360 € (1 RS) = 360 € Costs of travel: 1 flows (RS - RS) x 100 € = 400 € 100 € ; 2 flows (MK - RS) x 200 € = 400 €; 2 flows (BA - RS) x 100 € = 200 €; 6 flows (EU – RS) x 500 € = 3000 € Printing costs Printing flzers: 6 PCU x 300 x 1 € =1800 € Electronic design: 7 days x 35€ = 245 €


60

Activity title: Equipping the Training laboratory Sub Ref. N°: 3.6



In order to be wll prepared for the course helding the following equipment will be bought: Training classroom:

1. 1 computer - server 2. 9 computers 3. software for process simulation 4. software Netsupport school 5. videobeam 6. printer 7. copy machine 8. 2 laptop 9. Laboratory equipment

This will be done during second year, after the Workshop 2..



PCU-Novi Sad (RS), Co-coordination: a) Equipment buying. PCU-Niš (RS): a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Leskovac PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Tuzla PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Zvornik PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Skopje PCU-Štip (MK): a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Štip PCU-Podgorica (ME): a) Transfer organisation from Novi Sad to Podgorica

Target group/s: Staff members from Partner countriy universities

Inputs:

Equipment: 6 x server x 1200 € = 7200 € (6 coomputers); 6 x 9 computers x 700€ =37800 €; 6 x videobeams x 800 € = 4800 €; 6 x printer x 500 € = 3000 €: 6 x 2 laptops x 1000 € = 12000 €; 6 x software x 5000 € = 30000 €; 6 x Netsupport school x 550 € =3300 €; 6 x copy machine x 1500 € = 9000 €; 6 x Laboratory equipment x 6000 € = 30000 €


61

RELATED COSTS (for the outcome/output described above)

Budget Heading Related Costs in €

Staff Costs 116475

Cost of Stay, Travel Costs, Institutional Costs 30784

Equipment Costs 172800 143100

Printing and Publishing Costs 4090

Other Costs 0

Total Costs 324149 294449


62


Implement the newly developed curricula for the staff from industry Ref. N°: 4



and risks:

Motivation of the trainees from industry for the topics of the courses. Lack of interest to create new curricula on sustainable industry from the enterprise managaments.

Activity title: Course held for the staff from industry Sub Ref. N°: 4.1



At each PCU course for the staff for industry will be held. Actually 4 different courses are planned. Each one is adopted to the specific needs of the industry to whom the course have been created. After the course ending the trainees will have examinations. All the courses will be evaluated by the trainees. The courses will be held the way that have been agreed on the workshops. This will be done dur-ing the first half of the third year at each PCU.


63



There will be 6 working group, one in each 6 PC universities. Working group 1 The leader of the working group 1 will be Zoltan Zavargo, PCU - Novi Sad, RS 3 acad. staff from PCU – Novi Sad and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce of Vojvodina Trainees from industry Working group 2 The leader of the working group 2 will be Milorad Cakić, PCU - Niš, RS 3 acad. staff from PCU – Niš and 1 from PC Regional chamber of commerce and Trainees from industry Working group 3 The leader of the working group 3 will be Mirsad Đonlagić, PCU – Tuzla (BA) 3 acad. staff from PCU – Tuzla (BA) and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and Trainees from industry Working group 4 The leader of the working group 4 will be Radoslav Grujić, PCU – ISarajevo (BA) 3 acad. staff from PCU – ISarajevo (BA) and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and Trainees from industry Working group 5 The leader of the working group 5 will be Emilija Fidancevska, PCU – Skopje (MK) 3 acad. staff from PCU – Skopje and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and Trainees from industry Working group 6 The leader of the working group 5 will be Vineta Srebrenkoska PCU – Štip (MK) 3 acad. staff from PCU – Štip and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and Trainees from industry The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS):: a) Co-coordination the whole work in order to be done in the same

scheme b) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees c) Exam the trainees d) Eva-luate the course by the trainees e) Preparing the report on the whole work concerning course helding

PCU-Niš (RS): a) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees b) Exam the trainees c) Evaluate the course by the trainees d) Preparing the report on the whole work concerning course helding..

PCU-Tuzla (BA): a) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees b) Exam the trainees c) Evaluate the course by the trainees d) Preparing the report on the whole work concerning course helding. .

PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees b) Exam the trai-nees c) Evaluate the course by the trainees d) Preparing the report on the whole work con-cerning course helding.

PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees b) Exam the trainees c) Evaluate the course by the trainees d) Preparing the report on the whole work concerning course helding.

PCU-Štip (MK): a) Orginising and helding the course for the trainees b) Exam the trainees c) Evaluate the course by the trainees d) Preparing the report on the whole work concerning course helding.

Target group/s: The selected trainees from industry.

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 3 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 10 days x 40 € = 1200 €; 3 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 10 days x 40 € = 1200 € 3 Tuzla univesity acad. staff (BA) x 10 days x 64 € = 1920 €; 1 University of Istočno Sarajevo acad. staff x 10 dazs x 64€ = 1920 € 3 University of Ss. Cyrill and Metohdius acad.sStaff (MK) x 10 days x 76 € =2280 €; 3 Univer-sity Goce Delcev acad. staff (MK) x 10 days x 76 € =2280 €


64

RELATED COSTS (for the outcome/output described above)


Staff Costs 10800

Cost of Stay, Travel Costs, Institutional Costs 0

Equipment Costs 0


Other Costs 0

Total Costs 10800


65

III.5.1 DISSEMINATION

A maximum of one page A4 Please describe the dissemination strategy the partnership will follow in order to ensure that positive results will be made available both within and outside the Partner Country institutions during the life of the project.

Describe what type of dissemination actions your partnership envisages in order to make the outcomes available to groups not directly involved in the project. This could include information sessions, training exercises or the involvement of policy-makers not belonging to the partnership.

Please consult the Tempus handbook "Sustainability through Dissemination” for guidance on how to plan and implement this activity. It is available at http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/tempus/doc_en.html in the section "Thematic publications".

The project consortium is convinced that dissemination is playing a key role in the successful realization of the project activities. In order to achive a maximum impact, the results of the project's activities will be continuously disseminiated. The process will take place at all levels and at all stages of the project’s life. The dissemination will be planned at the very start of the project. In planning this process, it is important to identify the needs that project has to meet and the beneficiaries of the results. It is also very important to spread the information on the project's results It is very important to do the exact timetable of the dissemination actions. What will be disseminated, when and how?

Levels of dissemination: Internal - at the level of their own institution, External - at the level of the partner country and External - at the broader level. The results of each PCU work will be presented at their insitution and at the level of their own country and it will be visibla broader. It will be done at each stage of the project which is found to be interest to the group not directly involved in the projact. The results of the whole team work be presented at all key point stage also. The aim to make clear to the group not involved directly in the project: the objective of the project, the actions that are done in order to achive this objectives and to see the progress of the project. At the end of the project the results will be presented as well as the plans after the end of project. The informations sent to group not involved in the project must be clear and continuos.

Dissemination actions:

Development of the Project website: Internal and external dissemination. It is essential that the website be well structured and to be continuosly updated.

Dissemination conferences: Mainly internal but via media and internet can be made visible outside. The number of participants of the conference must be as broad as possible. the representatives from industry, Chamber of commerce and press must at the conference. At the beginning of the project the dissemination conference aim to show the situation in PC concerning sustainaility and the level of sustainability in EU. The next dissemination conference will present the deveoped courses. At the end of the project the results of course helding will be presented as well as the plan for the next year.

Dissemination the results by articles

Dissemination the results by lectures

Dissemination through media: text in newspapers, report and interview on radio and television.

Dissemination by flyers and CD's.

Dissemination booklet writing.


66


DISSEMINATION Ref. N°: 8



and risks:

Dissemination should be done from the start of the project and should be done during the whole project duration. All project partners should disseminate continuosly the results according to the agreed plan.

Activity title: Development of the project website Sub Ref. N°: 8.1



The coordinating university will develop, design the structure and the outlook the project website. The project website will contain two part: one “public“ and other “ partners only”. The first will be open to all and the other, protected with password, only to consortium mem-ber. It This part will be mainly devoted to project development. The website will be conti-nuously maintained and updated. The website plays an important role in disseminating the project results.

The partner/s or experts who will

carry out the activ-ity:

University of Novi Sad

Target group/s: All projet participants and all people interested in getting to know the project development and final project results.

Inputs:

Staff costs: 3 University of Novi Sad (RS) administrative staff cost: 60 days x 35 € = 2100 € 1 Electronic design x 12 days x 35€ = 420 € Equipment: Purchase of computer and software for web design and maintenance: 2000 €

Activity title: Organisation of disseminiation conferences Sub Ref. N°: 8.2.1

Starting date: Y1/M1(15/05/2010) End date: Y1/M6(15/06/2010)


First Dissemination Conference. One at each PCU

During the visits of EU experts in each 6 partner universities workshop will be organised. After the Workshops, at each PCU Dissemination conferences will organised. Dissemination confrences will be organisad in order to present the results of Screening and analizynig the status of knowledge in industry concerning sustainability and formulation the first course scheme.

The results will be presented to press and to academic staff not involved in the project.

The Dissemination conferences will be held during the fifth and the sixth month of the first year.


67



There will be 6 Dissemination conference, one at each 6 PC universities. Cordination of the activities: Zoltan Zavargo, co-coordinator, PCU – Novi Sad, RS First Dissemination Conference – Novi Sad 3 acad. staff from PCU – Novi Sad and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce of Vojvodina, 2

PC staff from industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) First Dissemination Conference – Leskovac 3 acad. staff from PCU – Niš and 1 from PC Regional chamber of commerce and 2 PC

staff from industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) First Dissemination Conference – Tuzla 3 acad. staff from PCU – Tuzla (BA) and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and 2 PC staff

from industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) First Dissemination Conference – Zvornik 3 acad. staff from PCU – ISarajevo (BA) and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and 2 PC

staff from industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) First Dissemination Conference – Skopje 3 acad. staff from PCU – Skopje and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and 2 PC staff

from industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) First Dissemination Conference – Štip 3 acad. staff from PCU – Štip and 1 from PC Chamber of commerce and 2 PC staff from

industry and 3 EU acad. staff (BE, GE, AT) The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS):: a) Co-coordination the whole work in order to be done in the same

scheme b) Orginising the dissemination conference PCU-Niš (RS), a) Orginising the dissemination conference PCU-Tuzla (BA): a) Orginising the dissemination conference PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Orginising the dissemination conference PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Orginising the dissemination conference PCU-Štip (MK): a) Orginising the dissemination conference EU country experts (BE, GE and AT): taking active part in the dissemination confrence PC Chambers of commerce and representatives from industry involved in the project: taking

part in the dissemination conference.

Target group/s: The representative from industry, press, group not involved in the project/

Inputs: Elaborated under 1.2


68




Second Dissemination conference. University of Novi Sad The developed courses will be presented. It will be opportunity to present the created courses as well as aim of the project. The Dissemination conference will be held after Course development workshop 3 in Novi Sad.. The results will be presented to press and to academic staff not involved in the project. The Dissemination conferences will be held during the sixth month of the second year.



Cordination of the activities: Zoltan Zavargo, co-coordinator, PCU – Novi Sad, RS On the Disemination conference there will be 13 members: 7 from PCU (3 from Home In-

stitution-Novi Sad, and 1 from each other PCU (4 RS, 2 BA, 2 MK), .4 staff from EU (2 BE, 1 GE and 1 AT). and 2 EU individual experts.

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS):: a ) Organisation the Dissemination conference b) Presentation the

courses PCU-Niš (RS): a) Presentation the created courses PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Presentation the created courses PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Presentation the created courses PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Presentation the created courses PCU-Štip (MK): a) Presentation the created courses

EU: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) coordination b) consulting c) taking active part at the Conference; Trier University of Applied Sciences (GE): a) taking active part at the Confrence;. Vienna university of Technology (AT); a) taking active part at the Conference.


Inputs: Elaborated under 3.5


69




Third Dissemination conference. University of Novi Sad After the end of the courses in the Chamber of Commerce the results of the courses will be pre-sented to the representativs from industries. The aim is to dissiminate the results and to attract new trainees for the next year.

Dissemination conferences at each PCU All 6 PCU will have presentation at the local level.

Dissemination conference in Novi Sad After the local presentation all PCU will have their presentation in Novi Sad.

The Dissemination conference will be held at the end of the third year at the University of Novi Sad.



Cordination of the activities: Zoltan Zavargo, co-coordinator, PCU – Novi Sad, RS On the Disemination conference there will be 13 members: 8 from PCU (3 from Home In-

stitution-Novi Sad, and 1 from each other PCU (4 RS, 2 BA, 2 MK), .4 staff from EU (2 BE, 1 GE and 1 AT). and 2 EU individual experts.

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: PCU-Novi Sad (RS), coordinator: a ) Organisation the Dissemination conference b) Presenta-

tion the courses PCU-Niš (RS): a) Presentation of the created courses PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Presentation of the created courses PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Presentation of the created courses PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Presentation of the created courses

PCU-Štip (MK): a) Presentation of the created courses

PCU-Podgorica (ME):: a) Presentation of the created courses

EU: Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) consulting; Trier University of Applied Sci-ences (GE): a) taking active part at the Confeence. Vienna university of Technology (AT) a) taking active part at the Conference.


Inputs:

Mobility inputs Costs of stay:10 stays x 576 € = 5760 € (4 EU + 2 EU experts + 4 PCU); 1 stay x 290 € = 290 € (1 RS) Costs of travel: 1 flows (RS - RS) x 100 € = 100 €; 2 flows (MK - RS) x 200 € = 400 €; 2 flows (BA - RS) x 100 € = 200 €; 6 flows (EU – RS) x 500€ = 3000 €


70

Activity title: Publication and presentation of project results 8.3

Starting date:


During whole project period the results will be published and presented. The aim is to reach the results to larger audience. Publications and presentations will include: Lectures Articles interviews/ for newspapers, radio and TV Leaflets and promotional material printing.



The working group will include: Acad. staff from PCU Novi Sad; Acad. staff from PCU Niš; Acad. staff from PCU Tuzla, Acad. staff from PCU Zvornik; Acad. staff from PCU Skopje; Acad. staff from PCU Štip.

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: All PCU: Dissemination the results. The preliminary schedule will be built at the very start. The plan will be reworked during project life.

Target group/s: All project partners + the staf from industry + groups not involved in the project

Inputs:

Printing:

Flyers: 6 PCU x 500 x 1 € = 3000 €

CD’s with cover: 6 PCU x 500 x 1 € = 3000 €

Electronic design: 12 days x 35€ = 420 €


71

Activity title: Dissemination booklet writing Sub Ref. N°: 8.4



The aim of this book is to present the objectives of the project, all the activities and the way that the goals are realised. It will also content the dissemination plan and activities. The evaluations will also have to be part of the book. Generally the book will cover the follwing chapters:

1. Mission of the project 2. Activities on the project 3. Activities on dissemination 4. Deveopled Courses Deveopled teaching materials Adopted teaching methods

Feedback from the trainees 5. Planned activites after the end of the Project 6. Assement reports 7. Summary

Objectives Realisation

The book will be written by one acad. staff from all PCU and will be coordinated and revised by coordinator and co-coordinator of the Project.



The leaders of the working group will be: Prof. Chris Van Keer, coordinator Prof. Zoltan Zavargo, co-coordinator The working group will include:

1 acad. Staff from PCU Novi Sad; 1 acad. Staff from PCU Niš; 1 acad. Staff from PCU Tuzla, 1 acad. Staff from PCU Zvornik; 1 acad. Staff from PCU Skopje; 1 acad. Staff from PCU Štip.

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows: EU Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE): a) coordination b) Mission of the Project c) Consulting and revising \ PCU-Novi Sad (RS), a) Co-coordination: b) Writing the part of the books on ativities on the Project concerning PCU Novi Sad c) Summary d) Consulting and revising e) Organisation of printing and publishing PCU-Niš (RS): a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU Niš PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU Tuzla PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU ISarajevo PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU Skopje PCU-Štip (MK): a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU Štip/

Target group/s: All project partners + the staff from industry + groups not involved in the project

Inputs:

Staff inputs: 1 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE) acad.staff x 4 days x 240 = 960 €; 2 University of Novi Sad (RS) acad. staff x 20 days x 40 € =1600 €; 1 Univesity of Niš (RS) x 10 days x 40 € = 400 € ; 1 Tuzla university acad. staff (BA) x 10 days x 64 € = 640 €; 1 Univer-sity of Istočno Sarajevo acad. staff x10 days x 64€ = 640 €;1 University of Ss Cyril and Metho-dusj acad.sStaff (MK) x 10 days x 76 € =760 €; 1 University Goce Delcev acad. staff (MK) x 10 days x 76 € = 760 €.

Printing: Printing: 2400 € Elctronic design: 18 days x 35€ = 630 € Others:

English language revision: 30 days x 35 € = 1050 €


72

COSTS RELATED TO DISSEMINATION


Staff Costs 8280

Cost of Stay and Travel Costs 9750

Equipment Costs 2000


Other Costs 1050

Total Costs 30530


73

III.5.2 SUSTAINABILITY

Identify the activities and results that are to be maintained

To anticipate the sustainability of your project, please describe, in table A below, under "long-term perspec-tives", the project’s activities or results that are supposed to last and/or be disseminated after the end of the EU funding. Sustainability may not concern all the aspects of a project. In each project some activities or outputs may be maintained, while others may not be so necessary to maintain. A project can therefore be considered as sustain-able if relevant activities are pursued and outputs are maintained or developed after the end of the EU funding (i.e. duration of new courses, up-dating of new tools…).

In table B below, please estimate the cost of the project’s activities that are to be maintained and the way they could be financed.

Anticipate the main sustainability factors in your project

In the section C below, please list the main context factors to take into account to ensure your project’s sustain-ability. They can have a positive or a negative influence on sustainability, depending on the specific characteris-tics of each context. These factors are context level factors, that is, elements external to the project itself but which you may influence somehow:

Main context level factors: 1. Academic and/or Institutional support

2. National support

3. Socio-economic support

Please complete section D below by describing how you intend practically to ensure the sustainability of your project, that is how you intend to take into account the context level factors (see section C below) as well the main project level factors:

Main project level factors: 1. Quality of project design in meeting academic, professional and/or social needs

2. Involvement of partners: sense of ownership and motivation

3. Effective management and leadership

4. Active participation of the audience (direct target groups)

5. Capacity for securing adequate resources for continuation

Please consult the Tempus handbook "Handbook on the sustainability of international higher education co-operation projects” for guidance on how to plan for and ensure sustainability. It is available at http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/tempus/doc_en.html in the section "Thematic publications". A. Long-term perspectives

Please describe here the project activities or results that are supposed to last and/or be dissemi-nated after the end of the EU funding (max. 100 words):

1. With the Chamber of Commerce the PCU will create the strategy for education the staff from the industry on sustainable industry

2. Meeting at the Chamber of Commerce with representative from industries


74

3. Flyers printing and spreading.

4. Updating and mainatance the Web

5. Helding course for new trainees.

6. Consulting services

7. WB PCU Network support

B. Project funding after EU support

Please estimate roughly the cost of the project activities that are to be maintained after the end of EU funding and how they could be financed:

Estimated cost of sustainable activities and/or results described above

Potential sponsors and funding sources (pub-lic/private; national/local)

1. - -

2. 500 € Chamber of commerce

3. 500 € Partner country universities

4. 1000 € Partner country universities

5. 10.000 € Enterprises

6. 10.000 € Enterprises

7. 2000 € Partner country universities & Ministeries

Comments on the estimated costs and the potential financial sources: All the costs are realistic C. Analysis of opportunities and threats related to sustainability

Please list the main factors to take into account to ensure the sustainability of your project; academic, institutional and/or socio-economic factors: academic, institutional and/or socio-economic factors: Opportunities: Povides a chance for for all target WB partner countries to enhance the cooperation between

universities and enterprises for the benefit of universities and enterprises as well Provides a chance to enhance the links between WB partner countries universities. Ex-

change of knowledge and experience will be of grat value for all partners. Provides a chance to enhance the links between WB partner country universities and EO

countries. It is very important for WB partner universities to have a links with EU country universities with great knowledge. The use of potential for both WB partner country univer-sities and EU universities is a vital interest for both WB and EU.

Provides the chance to enhance the LLL program application in WB country universities. To built a sustainable industry which will part of the sustainable society Threats: Political and academic authorities and enterpreneurs might not fully understand the relev-

ance and accept the concept of the project


75

Wider academic and enterprises might not willing to cooperate on sustainable industry issue Readiness to accept the need for cooperation beween WB parner countries and between WB

and EU countries Lack of interest of the enterprise management to be a part of LLL programme Lack of support of Chamber of commercies and Ministeries for such an activities Lack of active participation of some universities in target WB countries in dissemi-

nation sustainability activities and plans. D. Provisions made to enhance potential sustainability

Please describe here which practical steps you foresee in order to ensure the sustainability of your project :

1. Creation of Strategy and Plan for education on sustainable industry making in with cooperation of Chambers of commerce

2. Cooperation agreement between WB partner countries universities

3. Cooperation agreement between WB partner countriy universities and enterprises for the course helding after the end of the project

4. Approval on agrrement on creation of university-enterprise networks for education on sustainable technologies from all partner institutions

E. Activities devoted to sustainability during the project's life time and requiring specific finance Amongst specific activities which are to be implemented during the project's life time in order to ensure its sus-tainability, some may require finance: for example specific dissemination to potential financers, specific activi-ties to obtain accreditation, etc. Please complete the following tables for each of the activities to be financed in order to ensure future sustain-ability:


SUSTAINABILITY Ref. N°: 9

Starting date: End date:


and risks:

Interest to create new curricula on sustainable industry from the nterprises managament

Lack of interst of staff from industry to participate in the LLL programmes

Lack of interest of Chamber of commerceis to proceed the education on sustainable industry Lack of intersest of political structure to support the education on sustainable industry

Activity title: Creation the Strategic Plan for education on sustainable indus-try in cooperation with Chambers of commerce

Sub Ref. N°: 9.1

Starting date: Y3/M2 (15/01/2012) End date : Y3/M6 (14/06/2012)


76


In order to optimize the work on education on sustainable technologies, PCU in cooperation with Chambers of commerce the Strategic Plan for education will be built. The aim is to do this in an optimal way.

It will be done during first half of the third year and the plan is to realise it after the end of the project.



The leaders of the working group will be: Prof. Zoltan Zavargo, co-coordinator The working group will include:

1 acad. staff from PCU Novi Sad; 1 acad. staff from PCU Niš; 1 acad. staff from PCU Tuzla, 1 acad. staff from PCU Zvornik; 1 acad. staff from PCU Skopje; 1 acad. staff from PCU Štip. 1 staff member from PC Chamber of commerce

The distribution of tasks is foreseen as follows:

PCU-Novi Sad (RS), a) Co-oordination: b) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustain-nable technologies c) Consulting; PC Chamber of economy of Vojvodina (RS): a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting PCU-Niš (RS): a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Con-sulting PC Regional Chamber of commerce and Industry (RS): a) Creation of Strategy plan for edu-cation on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting PCU-Tuzla (BA: a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting; PC The Cantonal chamber of economy Tuzla (BA): a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting PCU-ISarajevo (BA): a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting; PC Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Bijeljina Region: a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting PCU-Skopje (MK): a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting; PCU-Štip (MK): a) Writing the part of the books on activities on the Project concerning PCU Štip; PC Economic Chamber of Macedonia: (MK) a) Creation of Strategy plan for education on sustainnable technologies b) Consulting

Target group/s: PCU and PC Chambers of commerce

Inputs:

Printing

Leaflets printing: 6 x 500 x 1 € = 3000 €

Electronic design: 7 days x 35€ = 245 €


77

COSTS RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY


Staff Costs 0


Equipment Costs 0


Other Costs 0

Total Costs 3245


78

III.5.3 QUALITY CONTROL AND MONITORING A maximum of half page, A4 size Quality control and monitoring should be an integral part of all project activities and results. Please use this sec-tion to describe your overall internal and external quality control and monitoring strategies/methods by provid-ing information on the following issues:

How will the timely achievement of the planned outcomes be demonstrated/measured in an objective and quantifiable way?

Which are the adjustment mechanisms foreseen in case the quality differs from the one expected or if the outcomes will not be achieved on time?

Please describe the concrete evaluation measures and the identified responsible actors.

Mechanisms for quality control and monitoring could include, for example,

peer reviews

evaluation surveys

internal institutional evaluation boards

external accreditation boards.

In the case of Curricular Refrom projects, quality can be encouraged through student evaluations, mandatory accreditation of all new/modified study programmes and increased recognition on an international level.

Inter-Tempus project coaching is highly recommended; partnerships may contact the members of running and/or completed Tempus projects in a similar field in order to use their accumulated expertise and to undertake a peer review. For details of running/ completed projects, applicants should consult the internet at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/tempus/index_en.html.

Applicants may also contact the National Contact Points (European Union Member States) and/or the National Tempus Offices (Tempus Partner Countries). Costs for Inter-Tempus project monitoring may be covered by the category “Other Costs” up to a maximum of € 2500 per project and cover fees, travel and subsistence. Resulting monitoring and quality reports undertaken must be included in the relevant Technical Implementation Report.

1. Each partner has to report in order to check timely achievement of the planned oucomes. All the reports is to sent to coordinator which wil proceed them to internal evaluator as well as to all partners in the project. Before the deadline the coordinator will check if there are some problems regarding the task. 2. If the outcomes differs or in the case the quality differs from the one expected or if the outcomes will not be achieved at time, a short time will be given to finish in a the work in a proper work. If it doesn't happen the task will be given to someone else to finish it. 3. The evaluation measures: evaluaton by coordinator evaluation by all the partners Actor from EU responsible for internal evaluation Mechanisms for qualty control and monitoring will include: peer reviews evaluation surveys


79

internal evaluation from EU acad. staff External evaluation


80


QUALITY CONTROL AND MONITORING Ref. N°: 10



and risks:

There is a risk that some project partners concentrate themselves too much on the daily realisation of the project activities without having in mind the overall wide project objective. Therefore it is essential to have an external quality expert for monitoring if all project activities continue to contribute towards the realisation of the overall project objective.

Activity title: Elaboration of internal quality report

Ref. No. of outcome/s to be assessed: All


Indicators of pro-gress:

Internal evaluation process positively completed

The foolowing activities will be evaluated: • the rate of using resources and the incurred costs as compared to the outcome of each activity, periodicity; • the extent of the outcome of each activity and how will it contribute to the purposes of the project • the eventual changes in the environment of the project (target groups, target sectors and potential beneficiaries) • Success of the communication flow and project coordination • Cost efficiency evaluated through internal procedures

How the indicators will be assessed:

Internal project report • Budget control sheets • Time table sheet • Printing material • Internal evaluation • external audit and EC controlling

Partner/s or experts who will carry out

the assessment: Trier University of Applied Science

Inputs: Staff inputs:

1 Trier University of Applied Science acad. Staff x 5 days x 3 years x 240 € = 3600 €

Activity title: Elaboration of annual quality evaluation report of the external experts

Ref. No. of outcome/s to be assessed: All

Starting date: Y1/M1 (15/01/2009) End date: Y3/M12 (14/01/2012

Indicators of pro-gress:

The quality assessment will take place according to the 9 following areas of interest of the EFQM Model for Excellence: 1. Leadership 2. Policy and strategy 3. People 4. People results 5. Processes 6. Customer results 7. Key performance results 8. Society results 9. Partnership resources


81

How the indicators will be assessed:

The external experts will each year prepare an annual quality evaluation report. In order to prepare this reports they will visit all partner universities in month 12 of project first year, month 9 of the project second and third year. The experts will present the results at each following planning and evaluation meeting.

Partner/s or experts who will carry out

the assessment: External experts

Inputs:

All costs concern the individual experts from Corvinus University, Budapest, Hungary and indi-vidual expert from Wroclaw university of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland. Staff costs 1 Corvinus University acad. staff x 12 days x 3 years x 97 € = 3492 € 1 Wroclaw university of Technology x 12 x 3 years x 105 € = 3780 € Stay 1 Corvinus University (HU) acad. staff x 3 years x 1 week x 3 PC x 1000 € = 9000 € 1 Wrocla university of Technology (PL) acad. staff x 1 week x 3 PC x 1000 € = 9000 €. Travel 1 Corvinus University (HU) acad. staff x 3 flows x 3 year x 3 PC x 500 € = 4500 € 1 Wrocla university of Technology (PL) acad. staff x 3 flows x 3 year x 3 PC x 500 € = 4500 € Attendance of evaluation and planning meetings (see also Activity 11.2 )


82

COSTS RELATED TO QUALITY CONTROL AND MONITORING


Staff Costs 10872


Equipment Costs 0


Other Costs 0

Total Costs 37872


83

III.5.4 MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT

A maximum of one page, A4 size Please provide a clear indication of the role and responsibility within the project of each member of the part-nership and, where appropriate, of each individual expert.

Applicants should give a forecast of the tasks that will have to be performed in each project year in order to guarantee effective and efficient project management. This section should also indicate the working hours needed for project management.

In addition, you should explain how the overall project management will be implemented making specific refer-ence to the management structure of the partnership, how decisions will be taken (reference should be made to decision-making mechanisms/bodies and their roles in case of divergent opinions) and how the partnership pro-poses to ensure permanent and effective communication and reporting.

KaHo Sint-Lieven will act as "grant applicant institution". The University from Novi Sad will do part of the job as co-coordinator. The two universities has a good expirience during the previous Tempus project 19020. In project management it is also very important to have in each consortium partner a subcoordinator who takes care not only of contents follow-up, but also of all administrative and financial issues. A critical succes factor in project management is the organisation at regular base of planning and evaluation meetings. Therefore will be held every six months a 4 days meeting in view of assuring the smooth running of the project. Not only contents follow-up, finances and administration, but also evaluation will be discussed at each occasion. Therefore also the external quality expert will be invited at each planning and evaluation meeting. A "planning and evaluation " meeting has been planned every six months. These, four days (travel days included) meetings will be organised in Gent, Novi Sad, Birkenfeld, Vienna, Skopje and Tuzla. The meetings will be attended by one representative of each participating university and additional representative from grant-applicant university and co-coordinating university. The participants at these "planning and evaluation meetings" will act as a "steering group" and will take decisions in common agreement for the smooth running of the project. Financial and administrative issues as well as contents development progress of all project activities will be dealt with at each meeting. The overall project quality monitoring will be an important item at each meeting. That's why the external quality expert will be invited at each meeting. The kocal non-university partner will also be invited to the meetings. In between the project partners will communicate via " E-mail, phone or fax". All administrative and financial documents will be also available at the "partners only" section of the website that will be used also for exchanging contents related issues in project development. At each planning and evaluation meeting the coordinator will also distribute an updated mailing list with all partner telephone numbers, e-mail addresses,. The EU universities KaHo Sint-Lieven (BE), Trier University of Applied Sciences (GE) and TEchnical UNiversity (AT) will be responsibe for: - Assisting at the Workshop Screening and analizynig the status of knowledge in industry concerning sustainability and on formulation the first course schemes - Organising a one week retraining and updating session for acad. staff. from RS, BA, MK and ME on sustainable industry issue - Assisting the RS, BA and MK staff members in developing and teaching the courses on sustainable insustry - Taking part in the workshops of the development of courses on sustainable industry - Aattending the dissemination workshops and publish the project results - Attending all planning and evaluation meetings The University of Novi Sad will do the part of the job concerning coordination. Besides, University of Novi Sad together with University of Niš, Universitz of Tuzla, Universitz of Istočno Sarajevo, University of Ss. Kiril and Metodij and University of Štip will be responsible for: - receiving the EU professors for taking a part in the Workshop Screening and analizynig the status of knowledge in industry concerning sustainability and on formulation the first course schemes - Indicating a 2 acad. staff members for each of the 3 retraining session in eu (BE, GE and AT) - Developing courses on sustainable industry

- Writing a teaching materials for the courses


84

- Taking a part in the workshops of the development of courses on sustainable industry - helding developed courses for the staff from the industry - Making a Strategic plan for education the staff from the industry after the end of the project - Organising the workshop after the end of the courses - Organising the Dissemination conferences - Attending on all planning and evaluation meeting - Writing a Dissemination booklet Two external experts: Prof. Gyula Vatai from Corvinus Unversity and Adam Pawelczyk will be in charge of the overall project quality and monitoring. Each year they will elaborate an annual quality repoerts which will be discussed at the following "Planning and evaluating meeting". They will also attend all "Planning and evaluating meeting" as well as Dissemination conference in the third year which will be held after the courses will end.


85


MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT Ref. N°: 11



and risks:

A lack of good understanding between all project partners must absolutely be avoided. Therefore it is essential to set up a good management structure with a considerable number of possibilities for consultations and meetings.

Activity title: General project management Sub Ref. N°: 11.1



This activity concerns the daily management of all project activities. In each participating university will be appointed a (sub)coordinator who will be in charge, not only of contents follow-up but also of daily administrative and financial management . This is essential to guarantee the smooth running of the project.



All university partners

Target group/s: Grant applicant + project co-coordinator and secretary + administrative responsible in each other project partner university

Inputs:

Staff costs: Administrative costs Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE) 1 manager x 60 days x 254 € x 3 years = 45720 € 1 admistrative staff x 40 days x 150 € x 3 years =18000 € University of Novi Sad (RS) co-coordinator: 1 manager x 130 days x 40 € x 3 years =15600 € 1administrative x 80 x 35 € = 8400 € subcoordinators 1 EU Trier University of Appled Sciences: 5 days x 240 € x 3 years = 3600 € EU Vienna Universiiy of Technology: 5 days x 240 € x 3 years = 3600 € PCU University of Niš x 25 days x 40 € x 3years = 3000 € PCU University of Tuzla; 20 days x 64 = 3840 € PCU Universiy of Istočno Sarajevo; 20 days x 64 € x 3 years = 3840 € PCU University of Skopje ; 20 days x 76 € x 3 years = 4560 € PCU Universiy of Štip; 20 x 76 € x 3 years =4560 € Overheads: Grant Applicant: 3000 € x 3 year = 9000 € Co-coordinator:2000 € x 3 year = 6000 € EU partners: 1000 € x 3 year x 2 partner = 6000 € PCU: 1000 € x 3 year x 5 partner = 15000 € Other costs; Grant applicant: 3000 €: bank transfer costs and costs for bying visa


86

Activity title: Planning and evaluation meetings Sub Ref. N°: 11.2



During the whole project there will be a planning and evaluation meeting every six months. The meeting will be attend 12 consortium mmbers. Two representative from Grant appli-cant (BE) and co-coordinator - one from other partners universities: Trier University for Applied Science (GE), Technical University (AT), University of Niš (RS), University of Tuzla (BA), Uni-versity of Istočno Sarajevo (BA), University of St. Kiril and Metodij (MK), University of Štip (MK) and University of Crna Gora (ME). The meetings in PCU will be attended by representative from Chambers of commerce and repre-sentaive from industry. Meeting 1 will be held in Gent (Y1/M1) Meeting 2 will be held in Novi Sad (Y1/M 7) Meeting 3 will b held in Birkenfeld (Y2/M1) Meeting 4 will be held in Skopje (Y2/M7) Meeting 5 will be held in Wien (Y3/M1) Meeting 6 will be held in Tuzla (Y3/M7 ) Meeting 7 will be held in Novi Sad (Y3/M12) The representatives of all project partners will act as a steering group taking care of the general project management. More particularly the steering group will take care of : follow-up and adaptation of work plan financial and administrative follow-up contents follow-up: selection of staff members, selection of trainees, feedback from the envi-

ronmental management course developers, project evaluation. preparing of Tempus reports Preparing the Dissemination booklet The individual expert will also be invited at each planning and evaluation meeting. Each meeting will take 4 days (travelling days included).



All project partners

Target group/s: Grant applicant + project co-coordinator + all subcoordinators in all other project partners + ex-ternal expert.


87

Inputs:

Mobility inputs Costs of stay: Meeting 1 (Gent): 11 stays x 576 € (2 EU + 7 PCU + 2 EU experts) = 6336 € Meeting 2 (Novi Sad): 10 stays x 576 € (4 EU + 4 PCU + 2 EU experts) + 1 stay x 290 € (1 RS) = 6050 € Meeting 3 (Birkenfield): 12 stays x 576 € (3 EU + 8 PCU + 2 EU experts) = 6912 € € Meeting 4 (Skopje): 11 stays x 576 € (4 EU + 5 PCU + 2 EU expert) + 1 stay x 290 € (1 MK) = 6626 € Meeting 5 (Vienna): 12 stays x 576 € (3 EU + 7 PCU + 2 EU expert) = 6912 € Meeting 6 (Tuzla): 10 stays x 576 € = 5760 (4 EU + 5 PCU + 2 EU expert) + 1 stay x 290 € (1 PCU BA - BA) = 6050 € Meeting 7 (Novi Sad): 10 stays x 576 € (4 EU + 4 PCU + 2 EU expert) + 1 stay x 290 € (1 RS) = 6050 € Costs of travel: Meeting 1 (Gent):11 flows (2 EU + 7 PC – 2 EU expert) x 500 € = 5500 € Meeting 2 (Novi Sad): 6 flows (5 EU – RS) x 500 € + 2 flows x (MK – RS) x 200 € + 2 flows x (BA – RS) x 100 € + 1 flows (RS – RS) x 100 € = 3700 €

Meeting 3 (Birkenfeld):12 flows (3 EU + 7 PC + 2 EU) x 500 € = 6000 €

Meeting 4 (Skopje): 6 flows (6 EU – MK) x 500 € + 5 flows x (PC – MK) x 200 € + 1 flow (MK – MK) x 100 € = 4100 €

Meeting 5 (Wien):12 flows (5 EU – EU + 7 PC – EU) x 500 € = 6000 €

Meeting 6 (Tuzla): 6 flows (6 EU – BA) x 500 € + 2 flows x (MK – BA) x 200 € + 3 flow (RS – MK) x 100 € + 1 flow (BA – BA) x 100 € = 3800 €

Meeting 7 (Novi Sad): 6 flows (6 EU – RS) x 500 € + 2 flows x (MK – RS) x 200 € + 2 flows x (BA – RS) x 100 € + 1 flows (RS – RS) x 100 € = 3700 €


88

COSTS RELATED TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT


Staff Costs 116265


Equipment Costs 0


Other Costs 3000

Overheads 36000

Total Costs 232032


89

SECTION IV: SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT

A summary of the project must be provided in English, French or German and may be included in future Tem-pus publications. This summary should be a snapshot of the project and should include its main features, includ-ing the principal outcomes and outputs. Please make sure that the information you provide in this section is con-sistent with the Logical Framework Matrix.

Outputs and Outcomes: (as in LFM)

1. Review and analyse the exsisting knowledge of the staff from industry on s2. Retrain the staff from WB partner univiersities in BE, GE and AT;

•3. Develop new curricula for the staff from the industry of RS, BA and MK •4. Implement the new developed curricula for the staff from the industry

•5.Increase the link with enterprises •6. Increase the links beetwen WB partner country univirsites;

•7. Increase the link between WB partner country universities and EU country universities •8. Dissemination; •9. Sustainability;

•10.Quality control and monitoring; •11 Management of the project.

Summary of the Main Features of the Project:

The aim of this project is to improve the university-enterprise cooperation in the process of creating a sustainable industry in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. To achieve this goal the partner universities will create a special courses on ustainable industry and thus enhance the LLL process and cooperation between industry and universities in the WB countries.. The environmental sustainability is rather a process than action. It is the process of making current processes sustainable in their interaction with the environment. The concept of sustainability requires such human activities which use only nature's resources at a rate at which they can be replenished naturally. The aim of zero emission is maximum resource productivity and virtually no waste. To reach this goal the technologies and processes must be improved. This can be approached in a number of ways: by technological innovation, pollution prevention, cleaner production, by-product synergy, etc. All of these are ways of eliminating or minimazing all kind of emission, while preventing to cause harm to the environment and human health. It is proven, and there are numerous examples, that it can be a profitable goal. Creating a zero emission industry is a great chalenge for EU. It enables sustainable development, a safe present and a safe future. At the same time it reduces significantly our energy and material resources. This way makes us less input dependent. It is planned that Inventorizing and analyzing the status of knowledge in industry regarding the topics of the courses wiil be done first. Workshops will be held on Screening and analizing the status of knowledge in industry concerning sustainability In order to be well prepared for the course developing, the academic staff from PCU will go for one week in each EU country to have a retraining and updating session.\ During the whole second year the courses will be developed. Three workshop are planned for this purpose. The EU partner will give their assistance, in order to have high qualty courses. The Chamber of commercies as well as industry will also be involved. In third year the courses will be held for the staff from industry. After the end of the course Dissemmination conference is planned to be held at each partner university. The aim is to show the results and to attract new trainees. With the help of chambers of commerce the scheme of work will be done. For each course written mteaching material will be prepared by the PCU staff. The written teachin material will be revised. At the end of the project planne will be work out for the next year.


90

The consortium is 3 EU unirsity from BE, GE and AT, 6 WB university from RS, BA and MK, 5 Chamber of commercies and 7 enterprise. Having in mind complexity of the topics of the issue that will be offered to industy to EU individual expert wee engaged. One of the main Bolgna declaration is concered closer connection of universities and enterprises. The LLL and university-enterprise is also the strategy of WB countries and universities involved in this project.

Quantitative data concerning the training of target groups involved in your project

Number of teaching staff trained or retrained 24 Number of trainers trained -0 Number of trainees trained 70 Number of administrative staff trained or retrained -0 Number of students involved or trained 0


91

Please tick the relevant boxes indicating which of these elements are covered by your project: Bologna Process

Establishment of a system of ECTS to promote student mobility

No

Adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees

No

Adoption of a system based on three cycles, undergraduate (bachelor) and post-graduate (Master and doctorate)

No

Introduction of double or joint degrees

No

Diploma supplement

No

Promotion of an international dimension in higher education

No

Lifelong learning as an essential element of the European Higher Education area

Yes

Modular structure of curriculum

No

Quality Assurance

No

e-Learning

No

University/Enterprise co-operation

Yes

Links to the labour market in degree programmes

No

Set up of project website

Yes

Qualification frameworks

No

Teacher training

Language

No

IT skills

No

Social and intercultural skills

No

Curriculum specific skills

No

Links with VET in

Adult training

Yes

Non-formal and informal education

No

Active citizenship

No

Occupational guidance and counselling

No


92

SECTION V: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS

In Tables 1 to 6 which follow, you are asked to provide estimates of the costs of your project (total project costs). Please complete the tables below, assigning costs to the headings "Staff Costs", "Travel Costs and Costs of Stay for Staff and Students", "Equipment Costs", "Printing and Publishing Costs", "Other Costs" and "Indirect Costs" (Overheads). Applicants should note that the total project costs consist of the operational or direct costs (tables 1-5) and of the overheads or indirect costs (table 6). Indirect costs can be granted up to a flat rate of 7% of the total eligible direct costs. In Table 7 you are asked to provide a detailed estimation on the amount to be co-financed by the part-ners, which must equal to at least 10% of the total eligible direct project costs. Table 8 presents the sum of the figures in the previous tables which are aggregated automatically from the data you provided therein. Below the summary table, messages will appear telling you whether or not you have complied with the financial ceilings set out in the Second Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009 under Tempus IV. Table 9 shows the breakdown of the income with which the project will be financed; that is a) from the partnership's own resources and b) from the Tempus grant and the flat-rate grant for indirect costs. The total project costs will be referred to as "total eligible costs" hereafter. Tempus co-finances 90% of the total eligible direct costs of a project and grants a flat-rate for indirect costs of 7% of the total eligible direct costs:

The minimum grant size for Joint Projects is € 500,000. The maximum grant size is €

1,500,000.

In the case of Kosovo, Montenegro and the five Central Asian countries, the minimum grant size for national Joint Projects is set at € 300,000.

Joint Projects can have a duration of up to three years (36 Months)

The budget plan should be consistent with project duration and with the details of the project descrip-tion. All amounts must be expressed in Euro (€). The following ceilings should be applied:

Staff cost: maximum 40% of total eligible direct costs; Equipment: maximum 30% of the total eligible direct costs; Overheads / Indirect costs: maximum 7% of the total eligible direct costs.

Applicants should be aware that the non-compliance with the budget ceilings indicated in the call for proposals 2009, may lead to a lower assessment grade or even the failure of the proposal to be selected for funding. Please do not use any decimals and do not use “thousand separators”. The figure “one thou-sand” should be indicated with consecutive digits: 1000 and NOT 1,000 or 1.000 or 1 000 or 1000,00


93

Table 1: Staff costs

The table below refers to the costs for both the academic and administrative personnel involved in the project. Please note that local rates must be used. For further details on eligible staff costs please refer to the Annexes 1 and 2 of the Tempus IV Second Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009.

STAFF COSTS (please specify what type of activity will be covered and provide a quantification in hours for the human resources needed for these activities)*

Budget in €

EU Academic Staff 1. Activity 1.1

1 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, teacher x 40 hours x 30 € = 1200 € 2. Activity 1.1

1 Trier university of Applied Science, teacher x 40 hours €x 30 € = 1200 € 3. Activity 1.1

1 Vienna university of Technology, teacher x 40 hours x 30 € = 1200 € 4. Activity 2.1

1 Katholike Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, teacher x 40 days x 30 € = 1200 € 5. Activity 2.2

1 Trier university of Applied Sciences, teacher x 40 hours x 30 €= 1200 € 6. Activity 2.3

1 Vienna university of Technology, teacher x 40 hours x 30 € = 1200 € 7. Activity 3.1

2 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, teachers. x 40 hours x 30 € = 2400 € 8. Activity 3.1

1 Trier University of Applied Science, teacher x 40 hours x 30 € = 1200 € 9. Activity 3.1

1Vienna university of Technology, teacher x 5 hours x 240 = 1200 € 10. Activiy 3.4

1 EU individual expert (HU), teacher x 160 hours x 11.25 € = 1800 € 11. Activity 3.4

1 EU individual expert (PL), teacher x 160 hours x 13.125 € = 2100 € 12. Activity 3.5

2 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, teachers x 40 hours days x 30 € = 2400 €

13. Activity 3.5 1 Trier University of Applied Sciences, teacher x 40 hours x 30 € = 1200 €

14. Activity 3.5 1 Vienna university of Technology, teaceher x 40 hours x 30 = 1200 €

15. Activity 3.5 1 EU individual expert (HU), teacher x 40 hours x 11.25 € = 450 €

16. Activity 3.5 1 EU individual expert (PL), teacher x 40 hours x 13.125 € = 525 €

17. Activity 10 1 Trier University of Applied Science, internal expert, teacher x 40 hours x 3 years x 30 € = 3600 €

18. Activity 10 1 EU individual expert (HU), teacher x 96 hours x 3 years x 11.25 € = 3492 €

19. Activity 10 1 EU individual expert (PL), teacher x 96 hours x 3 years x 13.125 € = 3780 €

1. 1200 €

2. 1200 €

3. 1200 €

4. 1200 €

5. 1200 €

6. 1200 €

7. 2400 €

8. 1200 €

9. 1200 €

10. 1800 €

11. 2100 €

12. 2400 €

13. 1200 €

14. 1200 €

15. 450 €

16. 525 €

17. 3600 €

18. 3492 €

19. 3780 €

Partner Country Academic Staff


94

1. Activity 1.1 3 University of Novi Sad (RS), teachers x 200 hours x 5 € = 3000 €

2. Activity 1.1 2 University of Niš(RS), teachers x 200 hours x 5 € = 2000 €

3. Activity 1.1 2 Univesity of Tuzla (BA), teachers x 160 hours x 8 € = 2560 €

4. Activity 1.1 2 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teachers x 160 hours x 8 € = 2560 €

5. Activity 1.1 2 University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius (MK), teachers x 160 hours x 9.5 € = 3040 €

6. Activity 1.1 2 University Goce Delcev (MK), teachers x 160 hours x 9.5 € = 3040 €

7. Activity 3.1 2 University of Novi Sad (RS), teacher x 40 hours x 5 € = 400 €

8. Activity 3.1 1 Univesity of Niš (RS), teacher x 40 hours x 5 € = 200 €

9. Activity 3.1 1 Univesity of Tuzla (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320 €

10. Activity 3.1 1University of East Sarajevo (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320 €

11. Activity 3.1 1 University of Ss Cyril and Methodius (MK), teacher x 40 hours x 9.5 € =380 €

12. Activity 3.1 1 University Goce Delcev (MK), teacher x 40 hours x 9.5 € = 380 €



15. Activity 3.2 1 Univesity of Tuzla (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320

16. Activity 3.2 1 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320 €

17. Activity 3.2 1 University of Ss Cyril and Methodius (MK), teacher x 40 hours x 76 € =380 €

18. Activity 3.2 1 University Goce Delcev (MK). teacher x 40 hours x 9.5 € =380 €

19. Activity 3.3 3 University of Novi Sad (RS), teacers x 800 hours x 5 € = 12000 €

20. Activity 3.3 3 Univesity of Niš (RS), teachers x 800 hours x 5 € = 12000 €


22. Activity 3.3 1 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teacherx 640 hours x 64€ =15360 €

23. Activity 3.3 3 University of Ss Cyril and Methodius (MK), teacher x 640 hours x 9.5 € = 18240 €

24. Activty 3.3 3 University Goce Delcev (MK), teacher x 640 hours x 9.5 € =18240 €



27. Activity 3.5

1. 3000 €

2. 2000 €

3. 2560 €

4. 2560 €

5. 3040 €

6. 3040 €

7. 400 €

8. 200 €

9. 320 €

10. 320 €

11. 380 €

12. 380 €

13. 400 €

14. 200 €

15. 320 €

16. 320 €

17. 380 €

18. 380 €

19. 12000€

20. 12000€

21. 15360€

22. 15360€

23. 18240€

24. 18240€

25. 400€

26. 200€

27. 320€

28. 320€

29. 380€

30. 380€

31. 1200€

32. 1200€

33. 1920€

34. 1920€

35. 2280€

36. 2290€

37. 1600€

38. 400€

39. 640€

40. 640€

41. 760€

42. 760€


95

1 Univesity of Tuzla (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320 € 28. Activity 3.5

1 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teacher x 40 hours x 8 € = 320 € 29. Activity 3.5

1 University of Ss Cyril and Methodius (MK), teacher x 40 hours x 9.5 € =380 €

30. Activity 3.5 1 University of Goce Delcev (MK), teacher x 40 hours x 9.5 € = 380 €


32. Activity 4.1 3 Univesity of Niš (RS), teachers x 80 hours x 5 € = 1200 €

33. Activity 4.2 3 Univesity of Tuzla (BA), teachers x 80 hours x 8 € = 1920 €

34. Activity 4.2 3 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teachers x 80 hours x 8 € = 1920 €

35. Activity 4.2 3 University of Ss Cyiril and Methodius (MK), teachers x 80 hours x 9.5 € =2280 €

36. Activity 4.2 3 University Goce Delcev (MK), teachers x 80 days x 9.5 € =2280 €

37. Activity 8.4 2 University of Novi Sad (RS), teachers x 160 hours x 5 € =1600



40. Activity 8.4 1 University of East Sarajevo (BA), teacher x 80 hours x 8 € = 640 €

41. Activity 8.4 1 University of Ss Cyiril and Methodius (MK), teacher x 80 hours x 9.5 € =760 €

42. Activity 8.4 1 University Goce Delcev (MK), teacher x 80 hours x 9.5 € = 760 €

EU Administrative Staff 1. Activity 2.1

1 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven, administrative x 16 hours x 20 € = 320 €

2. Activity 2.2 1 Trier University of Applied Sciences, administrative x 16 hours x 20 € = 320 €

3. Activity 2.3 1 Vienna university of Technology, administrative x 16 hours x 20 € = 1200 €

4. Activity 11.1 1 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE), 1 manager x 480 hours x 31.75 € x 3 years = 45720 €

5. Activity 11.1 1 Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven (BE, 1 admistrative x 80 hours x 20 € x 3 years =19200

6. Activity 11.1 1 Trier University of Appled Sciences x 40 hours x 31 € x 3 years = 3720 €

7. Activity 11.1 1 Vienna Universiiy of Technology x 40 hours x 31.875 € x 3 years = 3825 €

1. 320 €

2. 320 €

3. 1200 €

4. 45720€

5. 19200€

6. 3720 €

7. 3825€


96

Partner Country Administrative Staff 1. Activity 8.1

1 University of Novi Sad (RS), technical x 480 hours x 4.375 € = 2100 € 2. Activity 8.1

1 Universit of Novi Sad (RS), technical 96 hours x 4.375 € = 420 € 3. Activity 11.1

1 University of Novi Sad (RS), co-coordinator: manager x 1040 hours x 5 € x 3 years =15600 €

4. Activity 11.1 1 University of Novi Sad (RS) co-coordinator: administrative x 640 hours x 4.375 € = 8400 €

5. Activity 11.1 1 x University of Niš (RS), administrative x 200 hours x 5 € x 3 years = 3000 €

6. Activity 11.1 1 x University of Tuzla (BA), administrative x 160 hours x 8 € = 3840 €

7. Activity 11.1 1 Universiy of East Sarajevo (BA), administrative x 160 hours x 8 € x 3 years = 3840 €

8. Activity 11.1 1 University of Skopje (MK), administrative x 160 days x 9.5 € x 3 years = 4560 €

9. Activity 11.1 1 Universiy Goce Delcev (MK), administrative x 160 x 9.5 € x 3 years = 4680 €

1. 2100€

2. 420 €

3. 15600€

4. 8400€

5. 3000€

6. 3840€

7. 3840€

8. 4560€

9. 4560€

TOTAL STAFF COSTS: 287052

* Please provide specific calculations, e.g.: Lecturers of Partner Country Universities A and B x X number of hours x Y €uro per hour equals Z, etc.


97

Table 2: Costs of Stay, Travel Costs, Institutional costs For maximum costs of stay, please refer to the Tempus IV Second Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009, Annex 3. The partnership should additionally calculate estimated travel costs and should indicate the total for both costs of stay and travel.

Please indicate in this table which mobilities are planned throughout the whole project duration Staff/trainees

Direction Number of

flows*

Costs of stay (€)

Travel costs (€)

From To

Partner Country EU/Candidate Country

69 60096 34500

EU/Candidate Country** Partner Country 88 57332 37000 EU EU 19 8064 7000 Partner Country Partner Country 52 22724 5800

Within a Partner Country 11 2530 800

Total: 15074

6 85100

Students

Direction Number of

flows* Costs of stay

(€)

Institutional costs*** (€)

Travel costs

(€) From To

Partner Country EU EU Partner Country Partner Country Partner Country

Within a Partner Country Total:

Institutional costs Flows to EU institutions: A maximum of € 500 per student for a study period of maximum 3 months Flows to Partner Country institutions: A maximum of € 200 per student for a study period of maximum 3 months * Please note that one flow equals one two-way journey. In the case of group travel, each person should be

considered as an individual flow (5 staff travelling to the same project meeting = 5 flows). Should an indi-vidual carry out several visits, each visit should be considered as 1 flow (Prof X participating in 3 coordina-tion meetings abroad = 3 flows).

** In this direction Tempus funds may only be used for mobilities of EU partners and/or EU individual experts travelling to Partner Countries.

*** Institutional costs are eligible for “student study periods” abroad only. NB: Be sure to include visa costs in your calculations of travel costs in this section.


98

Table 3: Equipment costs

the maximum budget allowed for equipment costs is 30% of the total eligible direct costs

Please give details and quantify items of equipment needed for the activities, listing them clearly by the partner country university/ies at which each item will be installed. You should ensure that these details correspond to those given in the Outcome Tables. Please remember that only partner country universities may benefit from equipment funding.

LIST OF EQUIPMENT Beneficiary university/ies Budget in €

1. Literature

2. Server

3. computers

4. videobeams

5. Printers

6. Copy machines

7. Laptops

8. Simulaton software

9. Net School

10. Laboratory equipment

11. Computer and software for web site

1. All PCU 6 x 1000€ = 6000 €

2. All PCU 6 x 1200 € = 7200 €

3. All PCU 6 x 9 x 700 € = 37800 €

4. All PCU 6 x 800 € = 4800 €

5. All PCU 6 x 500 € = 3000 €

6. All PCU 6 x 1500 € = 9000 €

7. All PCU 6 x 2 x 1000 € = 12000 €

8. All PCU 6 x 5000 € = 30000 €

9. All PCU 6 x 550 € = 5500 €

10. All PCU 6 x 6000 € = 36000 €

11. University of Novi Sad

1. 6000 €

2. 7200 €

3. 37800 €

4. 4800 €

5. 3000 €

6. 9000 €

7. 12000 €

8. 30000 €

9. 5500 €

10. 36000 €

11. 2100 €

TOTAL EQUIPMENT COSTS 180800


99

Table 4: Printing and Publishing costs Please estimate the amount you would require to cover printing and publishing costs and give details on the type of material.

TYPE OF PUBLICATION AND N° OF COPIES (indicative) Budget in €

1. Photocopies of course materals

2. Printing of course books 240 copies

3. Course book electronic design

4. Flyers: 3000 copies

5. Flyers electronic design

6. Flyers: Projects results

7. CD's with cover: 3000 copies

8. CD's and cover design

9. Dissemination booklet printing 500 copies

10. Dissemination book electronic design

11. Leaflets: 3000 copies

1. 300

2. 1800

3. 245

4. 1800

5. 245

6. 3000

7. 420

8. 3000

9. 2400

10. 630

11. 3000

TOTAL PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COSTS 16840


100

Table 5: Other costs

Here you should anticipate any other eligible expenses, which might arise during your project, giving rea-sons for each item. Expenses listed here must be fully detailed and justified.

EXPENSES (please specify) REASON (please specify) Budget in €

1. Dissemination booklet english language revision

2. Bank transfer

3. costs for bying visa

1. To be on proffesional level

2. Obligatory

3. Obligatiryl

1. 1050

2. 1500

3. 1500

TOTAL OTHER COSTS 4050


101

Table 6: Indirect costs – Overheads

the maximum budget allowed for indirect costs is 7 % of the total eligible direct costs

Please indicate the amount needed to cover indirect costs.

INDIRECT COSTS (please specify) Flat-rate in €

1. General project managament: telephone, fax, e/mail, heating, cleaning of offices, office equipment, 36000 €,

1. 36000

TOTAL OVERHEADS 36000


102

Table 7: Summary of co-financing requirements Applicants must provide co-financing. Co-financing must be at least 10% of the total eligible direct costs.

Applicants should specify through which resources (their own, from other EU Institutions or EU Member States, other organisations) they intend to co-finance the project, and what the co-financing is likely to cover.

NOTABENE: Overheads/indirect costs, the costs of premises (purchase, rent, heating, maintenance, re-pairs etc.), the purchase of office and/or classroom furniture and exchange losses do not represent eligible costs and thus may not be declared under the heading co-financing. Any eligible cost described in section 10.5 of Call can be provided as co-financing.

*E.g.: governmental subvention, organisation/institution’s own resources ** E.g.: Preparation of training materials= 2 days x 7,5 hours x 3 persons x € 25 ***E.g: Equipment, staff costs, publication

Source of CO-FINANCING*

Justification** Item*** Budget in €

1. Own resources

2. Own resource

3. Own resource

4. Own resource

5. Own resource

6. Own resource

7. Own resource

8. Own resource

9. Own resource

10. Own resource

11. Own resource

1. University of Novi Sad

2. Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven

3. Trier university of Applied

4. Vienna university of Technology

5. University of Nis

6. Tuzla university

7. University of Istocno Sarajevo

8. University of Ss Cyril and Methodius

9. University Goce Delcev

10. Corvinus university, individual expert

11. Wroclaw university of Technology, individual expert

1. Staff cossts (25.3%)











1. 11517

2. 19177

3. 3451

4. 2567

5. 4850

6. 4858

7. 6396

8. 6396

9. 7595

10. 7595

11. 1453

12. 1620

TOTAL CO-FINANCED 72624


103

Summary of project funding requirements The estimated amounts given for each heading should correspond to the totals in the tables which detail the budget breakdown for each category of expenditure and must be expressed in Euro (€). In order for this summary tableto work properly, alternately tick/un-tick the two tick-boxes below. Table 8:

PROJECT COSTS TOTAL

A.1 Staff Costs € 287052

A.2 Travel costs, costs of stay and institutional costs € 235846

A.3 Equipment € 180800

A.4 Printing & publishing € 16840

A.5 Other costs € 4050

ELIGIBLE DIRECT COSTS (total A.1 – A.5) € 724588

A.6 INDIRECT COSTS (overheads, maximum 7% of the total eligible direct costs) € 36000

A TOTAL ELIGIBLE COSTS (total A.1 – A.6): € 760588

Staff Costs ceiling of 40% of the Eligible Direct Costs is respected Equipment Costs ceiling of 30% of the Eligible Direct Costs is respected Indirect Costs ceiling of 7% of total operational costs is respected Table 9:

PROJECT FINANCE AMOUNTS

A.1 Co-financing at least of 10% of the total eligible direct costs (from the own re-sources of the partnership)

€ 72624

Tempus grant

A.2 Financing at most of 90% of the total eligible direct costs (from the EU) € 651964

A.3 Maximum 7% of the total eligible direct costs (from the EU) € 36000

TOTAL FROM TEMPUS (A.2 + A.3) € 687964

TOTAL PROJECT FINANCE (A.1 + A.2 + A.3) € 760588

Total Costs Co-financing amount respects the 10% minimum of Total Eligible Direct Costs

I have verified the amounts reported in the summary table above (Table 8 - Summary of project fund-

Once you have provided the amounts in the detailed financial tables on previous pages, alter-nately click these two tick-boxes in order to update the totals in the table above and the verifi-cation messages below


104

ing requirements) and checked that these comply with the Tempus ceilings and thresholds specified in the Tempus IV Call for Proposals EAC/01/2009 and restated at the beginning of Section V – Funding Re-quirements. NB: In rare cases the settings of the automatic calculation of the above summarising table might not work properly. Applicants are therefore advised to counter-check their figures, using a calculator.


105

Table 10: Breakdown of the project costs

In the table below applicants are asked to provide an overview of the indicative breakdown of the project costs amongst the partners.

Name of the partner institution Project costs in €

Katholieke Hogeschool Sint-Lieven 111772

University of Novi Sad 125742

Trier university of Aplied Scineces 28826

Vienna university of technology 32531

University of Niš 69046

Univesity of Tuzla 74848

University of East Sarajevo 75698

University of S.Cyrill and Methodius 79988

University of Goce Delcev 80838

VOKA Chamber of commerce East-Flandria, BE 4500

Chamber of economy of Vojvodina, RS 1500

Regional chamber of commerce, RS 1500

Chamer of commerce Bijeljina 1500

Chamber of commerce canoton Tuzla 1500

Economic chamber of Macedonia 1500

Alltech-Fermin, RS 1500

Sugar factory Senta, RS 1500

DCP Hemigal, RS 1500

Vetfruit, BA 1500

Birac, BA 1500

BOMEX 1500


106

EUROKOMPOZIT 1500

External individual expert, Corvinus university (HU) 29068

External individual expert,Wroclaw university of Technology(HU) 29731

TOTAL ELIGIBLE COSTS (A) € 760588


107

SECTION VI: ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS

There are two different forms to be filled out concerning the legal status of the applicant – the so-called "Legal Entities" forms: (1) a form for "Public Entities" (2) a form for "Private Companies" Please note that: Organisations and institutions whose founding act is based on public law (such as resolution, law, decree or decision etc.) have to fill in the form for "Public Entities". whereas; Not only companies but also organisations and institutions whose founding act is based on private law (such as registration, agreement, contract, declaration of association etc.) have to fill in the form for "Pri-vate Companies" – even if they are not a company. In addition, a form financial identification is needed and should also be filled in on-line. These forms need to be filled in on-line and can be found in the following websites: Public legal entity form. http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/execution/legal_entities/idlegent_pub_en.pdf or Private legal entity form: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/execution/legal_entities/idlegent_pris_en.pdf plus Financial Identification form: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/execution/financial_identification/fich_sign_ba_gb_en.pdf Please go to the appropriate websites, fill-in the relevant form, print it, scan it and send it to-gether with the other administrative and supporting document by 12 May 2009. If the proposal is selected for funding, you will be requested to provide the original, signed/stamped paper version of these forms at a later date.


108

SECTION VII: CHECKLIST

A. Before submitting your application by e-mail by 28 April 2009 at 16:00, please make sure that it is complete and tick the boxes accordingly:

1) Section I: the Declaration on Exclusion and Selection Criteria is completed

2) Section I: the Agreement on Publication is completed

3) Section I: the Endorsement letters are completed

4) Section I if applicable: the Declaration for Qualifying as Public Body is completed

5) Section II: the Basic Data on the Project is provided 6) Section II: all the Partners and Individual Experts are listed and contact persons are

indicated

7) Section III: the Description of the Project covering all questions is provided

8) Section IV: the Project Summary Sheet is complete

9) Section V: the tables regarding Funding Requirements are complete

B. After obtaining a reception number and before submitting the supporting and admin-istrative documents by 12 May 2009, please make sure that they are complete by using the following check list and ticking the boxes accordingly:

1) The cover letter indicating the reception number is enclosed. 2) Section I: the Declaration on Exclusion and Selection Criteria is signed and stamped

or sealed

3) Section I: the Agreement on Publication is signed and stamped

4) Section I: the Endorsement Letters are signed and stamped or sealed

5) Section I: the documents for the evaluation of the Technical Capacity are enclosed. 6) Section I if applicable: the Declaration for Qualifying as Public Body is signed and

stamped or sealed 7) Section I if applicable: Profit and Loss Accounts, together with the balance sheet for

the last three financial years for which the accounts have been closed, are enclosed

8) Section VI: the Legal Entities Form is signed and stamped

9) Section VI: the Financial Identification Form is signed and stamped

NOTABENE: The original of these documents will be required if the proposal is shor-tlisted to be considered for funding.