appendix a: curriculum vitae of charlie du toit · eia omaruru trade and industrial estate which...

APPENDIX A: CURRICULUM VITAE OF CHARLIE DU TOIT

1. NAME : Charlie du Toit

2. DATE OF BIRTH : 29 October 1960

3. NATIONALITY : Namibian

4. EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING:

Institution: Boland Agricultural High School, Paarl, Republic of

South Africa

Date :from (month / year) :

To (month / year) :

January 1974

December 1978

Diploma obtained: Grade 12

Institution: University of Stellenbosch, RSA


To (month / year) :

1979

1982

Certificate obtained: BSc Agric Hons (Chemistry, Agronomy and Soil

Science)

Institution: University of Stellenbosch, RSA


To (month / year) :

1985

1987

Degree obtained: Hons B (B + A) in Business Administration and

Management

5. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (most recent experience first):

EXPERIENCE (SELECTED RECORDS)

Name of Project Date Client

EIA Omaruru Trade and Industrial

Estate which includes a service

station on a portion of the Remainder

of Portion B and Portion 57 of

Omaruru Town and Townlands No. 85

2015 NDC

EIA Kwando North Gateway Resort in

the Babatwa Park

2015 Mufiljo Investment CC

EIA Farm Wanderdunen No. 23

Rezoning to Industrial

2014 Private owners and developers

EIA Service Station on Portion 52 of

Farm Koichas No. 89, Mariental


ERF 1581 Rundu, Regional Head

Office of Ministry of Agriculture, Water

and Forestry. EIA for closure of public

open space and rezoning of erf

2013 NDC/Ministry of Agriculture,

Water and Forestry

EIA Erf 376, Outjo development of

Tourist Market and SME Center

EIA Omugongo Trade and Industrial

Estate

EIA of for Industrial development on

portion 51 - 52, Dobra

2013 NDC/Ministry of Trade and

Industry

Private Developers

EIA for industrial development on

Portion 428 of Farm Brakwater No. 48

EIA for rezoning of Portion 176 of

Farm Brakwater 48 to industrial

EIA for rezoning to industrial and to

use Portion 87 of Farm Brakwater 48

for a slaughterhouse


Environmental Management Plan

Taranga Island Lodge

EIA Industrial development and use

Portion 35 of Farm Dobra No. 49

2011 Private owners

Layout Planning and Subdivision for

residential development of Portion 33

of Farm Nubaumis No. 37

Layout planning and subdivision for a

residential development on Portions

89 & 90 of Farm Brakwater

Application for Goreangab Waterfront

Development on Erf 3188, Goreangab

under Special Projects Policy of City

of Windhoek


Feasibility, layout planning and

subdivision Portion 75 of Okahandja

Town and Townlands

Layout Planning and Subdivision of

Oshakati Town and Townlands No.

880

EIA Portion 24 of Farm Brakwater No.

48


Portion 24 of Farm Brakwater No. 48

2009 NDC

NDC

Private Developer

Layout Planning and Subdivision –

new Dairy Production Unit, Farm

Purple Gold 511, Seëis

2008 Private Developer

Layout Planning and Subdivision

Farm Arcadia No. 134, Seëis

2008 Private Developer

Assisting in the Layout Planning and

Formalization of Sukulu Wildlife

Development, Farm Augeigas

2007 Private Developers


various Brakwater Portions:

Portion Re/38, Farm Brakwater No.48

Portion 44, Farm Brakwater No.48












2006 - 2008 Private Owners and Developers


various Nubaumis Portions:

Portion 20/59, Farm Nubaumis No. 37

Portion 21, Farm Nubaumis No. 37

Portion 30, Farm Nubaumis No. 37

Portion 45/63, Farm Nubaumis No. 37

2005 -2008 Private Owners and Developers


various Dobra Portions:

Portion 12, Farm Dobra No. 49



2005 -2008 Private Owners and Developers

General Manager Commercial and

Marketing – Reporting to the MD -Key

responsibilities:

2003 - 2005 Pupkewitz Megabuild

Marketing - to analyse market trends

and to ensure that customer

expectations were met;

Procurement – To establish, maintain,

develop and optimise sound supplier

relationships;

Inventory management – to optimise

the stockholding of the Group through

the implementation of systems to

manage slow moving and excess

stock, the availability of stock and the

product range;

Logistics – to manage the inbound

supply chain;

Co-ordination with the operational,

finance and admin and the human

resources functions.

General Manager Trade – Reporting

to the CEO - Key Responsibilities

Determination of Product range and

mix;

The selection of suppliers/vendors

and transporters;

The pricing strategy;

The growth of turnover and the

retention and improvement of

margins;

Inventory management;

The simplification of processes and

tasks at branch level;

The reduction of shrinkage;

The evaluation of Agra business units

on positioning and performances;

Feasibility studies on new

investments.

1995 - 2003 Agra Cooperative Limited

Chief Agricultural Consultant

Agricultural Specialist acting as

project leader on various projects

undertaken by the NDC/FNDC on own

initiative or on behalf of the

1989 - 1995 Namibia Development

Corporation

governmental or private institutions.

The own NDC operations managed by

myself include the Eersbegin Date

project, the Naute Irrigation project,

the Shitemo project, the Musese

project, the Vungu-Vungu dairy, the

Shadikongoro project and the

Mahangu and Cotton Farmers’

Support programs. Projects managed

on an agency basis are the Etunda

and Omega farmer settlement

schemes. This operations include

about 800 ha under irrigation and 3

000 ha under rain fed conditions.

Crops like mahangu, groundnuts,

cotton, wheat, dates, barley and

vegetables are produced.

Agricultural Researcher with the

Department of Agriculture acting as

researcher and assistant other senior

agricultural researcher on various

assignments of the Department

1985 - 1988 Ministry of Agriculture

I hereby declare that the information portrayed in this CV is accurate and true.

__________________________________

Charlie du Toit

APPENDIX B: CHARLIE DU TOIT IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT

APPENDIX C: CURRICULUM VITAE OF CARIEN VAN DER WALT

1. Proposed Position : Environmental Consultant/Practitioner

2. Name : Carien van der Walt

3. Date of Birth : 06 August 1990

4. Nationality : Namibian

5. Education:

Years Institution Degree/Diploma

2009 to 2011 University of Stellenbosch B.A. (Degree) Environment and

Development

2012 to 2013 University of South Africa B.A. (Honours) Environmental

Management

6. Languages:

Language Speaking Reading Writing

English Excellent Excellent Excellent Afrikaans Excellent Excellent Excellent

7. Employment History:

Elmarie Du Toit Town Planning Consultants 2010/2011 Vacation Work

Green Earth Environmental Consultants 2011/2012 Permanent

8. Work undertaken that best illustrates capability to handle the tasks assigned:

Name of assignment or project: Taranga Safari Lodge

Year: 2012

Location: Rundu, Namibia

Client: Mr Cobus Bruwer

Main project features: Environmental Management Plan compilation

Status: Clearance Certificate Obtained

Name of assignment or project: The sand mining operations of Sand Worx CC

Waterfront Development Project

Year: 2012

Location: Windhoek, Namibia

Client: Green Building Construction

Main project features: Environmental Management Plan compilation


Name of assignment or project: Erf 35, Farm Brakwater No. 48

Year: 2012

Location: Windhoek (Brakwater)

Client: Ms CJ Maposa

Main project features: Scoping Assessment for Rezoning to Industrial and




Year: 2012


Client: Mr Andre van Staden





Year: 2012


Client: Mr D Barnard





Year: 2012


Client: Indraai Abattoir




Name of assignment or project: Areva Uranium Mine

Year: 2012

Location: Swakopmund

Client: Areva Uranium Mine

Main project features: Scoping Assessment for Road Construction and


Name of assignment or project: Wispeco Namibia

Year: 2012

Location: Windhoek (Northern Industrial Area)

Client: Wispeco Namibia

Main project features: Environmental Auditing Report for site and


Name of assignment or project: Tsumeb Industrial Development

Year: 2012

Location: Tsumeb

Client: Namibia Development Corporation

Main project features: Scoping Assessment for Industrial Development and



I hereby declare that the information portrayed in this CV is accurate and true.

__________________________________

Carien van der Walt

APPENDIX D: CARIEN VAN DER WALT IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT

APPENDIX E: NEWSPAPER NOTICES

APPENDIX F: NOTICE ON SITE

APPENDIX G: NOTICE BOARD

APPENDIX H: COMMENTS FROM I&APS

Person: Comments:

Frank Lohnert From: Frank Lohnert [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 20:37

To: [email protected]; [email protected]

Subject: Registration as I&AP for Project: Lodge, Nature estate,

etc on Re, of Farm Good Hope No 298

Dear Carien, Charlie,

Please register me as I& AP for above and send draft Scoping

Report.

Thanks, regards,

Frank Löhnert [email protected]

Charlie Du Toit Dear Frank

Your email below refers. We herewith confirm that you have

been registered as I & AP. We are still busy preparing the BID as

it is subject to the approval of the Otjiwarongo Structure Plan as

well as the bulk services report from the engineers. It will be send

to you once completed.

Regards

Charlie

mailto:[email protected]




APPENDIX I: POWER OF ATTORNEY

APPENDIX J: COUNCIL APPROVAL MUNICIPALITY OF OTJIWARONGO

APPENDIX K: DIAGRAMS

APPENDIX L: HIGH LEVEL SERVICES DESIGN

APPENDIX M: RAILWAY CROSSING APPLICATION

APPENDIX N: ACCESS APPLICATION

APPENDIX O: ROADS AUTHORITY LETTER

APPENDIX P: FORM 2

Form 2

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEARANCE

The completion of this questionnaire is a requirement under section 31 of the Act and

regulation 9(1)(i).

PURPOSE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE

The information you provide in this questionnaire will enable the Environmental

Commissioner to gain a clear understanding of your past and current activities, and your

future plans. This will help the Environmental Commissioner to determine whether your

Environmental Clearance Certificate can be renewed without the need for further

information, or not. The proponent must complete this questionnaire accurately, honestly

and comprehensively.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Name of your activity/project: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE

RENEWAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE TO FINALISE THE TOWN PLANNING

PROCEDURES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LODGE, NATURE ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL ERVEN

AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ON THE REMAINDER OF FARM GOOD HOPE NO. 298,

OTJIWARONGO, OTJOZONDJUPA REGION

Location of the activity: The Remainder of Consolidated Farm Good Hope

No. 298, Otjiwarongo, Otjozondjupa Region

GPS coordinates of activity location:

IF PROPONENT IS A COMPANY **

Name Brandberg Construction

Registration Number none Registration

Date

n.a.

Phone No. 061252467 Fax No. 061251249

Mobile phone No. - Email

address

[email protected]

Website -

Physical Address Postal Address

- PO Box 11588

- Windhoek

-

Date that the activity originally started See Report

Reference number of last Clearance

Certificate

See copy of Clearance Certificate in

Report

Date of last Clearance Certificate 30 May 2016

** Copy of Registration Certificate to be attached

Much of the information provided in this form should be obtained from the results of the

monitoring of the implementation of the EMP for the activity during the period of the

current environmental clearance. In addition to answers provided to questions in this form,

the proponent is expected to provide supporting documents (e.g. a revised EMP,

monitoring reports, data, audit reports, inspection reports), photographs, etc. These can

be attached as appendices.

The proponent is accountable for any inaccurate or misleading information. The person

who completes this questionnaire must read and sign the declaration statement on page

14.

ACTIVITY SUMMARY

Briefly describe the nature and purpose of the activity. Provide key information on the

activity’s main components, industrial processes, raw materials, waste products,

infrastructure, land requirements, lifespan and closure procedures. If available, attach a

map, ground plan and a copy of monitoring reports.

The main nature and purpose of the activity is a residential development to provide housing. It is

the intention of the Proponent to construct a lodge, nature estate, residential erven and a rural

residential estate including public open spaces, public streets and servitudes on the Remainder

of Consolidated Farm Good Hope No. 298, Otjiwarongo, Otjozondjupa Region. The proposed

development will take place over 2 phases. During Phase 1 the Remainder of Farm Good Hope

No. 298 will be subdivided into 158 portions. During Phase 2, a township consisting of 306 erven

will be established on Portion 149 which has been created in Phase 1. In the future, if there is a

demand for more serviced erven, it is intended to establish similar townships on Portions 148,

150, 151 and 152. It is estimated that a further 3000 plus erven will be created through these

processes. The proposed development will be serviced by the normal bulk services including

electrical and water reticulation systems, a waterborne sewer system and street network in

accordance with Municipal requirements.

Limited industrial processes were used in the construction of the development. The raw materials

and waste products associated with the project include empty cement bags, pipelines, culverts,

bricks, iron, wood, plastic containers, glass, etc. The land requirements are limited to the above-

named erven/portions. The lifespan of the project is uncertain due to its nature however a closure

plan will be included in the EMP.

MAP

See Environmental Impact Assessment Renewal Report.

PHOTOGRAPHS

See Environmental Impact Assessment Renewal Report.

1. General (please tick the appropriate box and provide the relevant details)

Above expectation: means better than the targets set/stated in the EMP. If there are no

targets in the EMP, then benchmark your answer against what would be regard as an

appropriate target based on professional judgment. In this regard, it may be helpful to

obtain input from a qualified Environmental Practitioner.

As expected: means targets are being met as set in the EMP

Disappointing: means targets set in the EMP are not being met

NA: means the question is not applicable to the circumstances of the activity

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA

Detailed description – add

documentary evidence,

photographs, reports as

numbered appendices

i Have you been able to

avoid or minimize

spillages of toxic or

hazardous substances?

X The majority of spillages will

be avoided. The erven does

not have any evidence that

toxic or hazardous spillages

took place.

ii Is your existing

infrastructure adequate

for the continuation of

the activity (e.g. roads,

powerlines, housing,

airfield, jetty)

X The existing infrastructure will

be upgraded where required in

order to accommodate the

development. Roads,

housing, etc. will be

constructed on the project site.

v How well have you

complied with water

use/efficiency

targets/permit

restrictions?

X Water will be used for the

construction process and not

yet for residential activities

however the water usage

amount is as expected.

vi How well have you

complied with energy

efficiency targets?

X Energy/electricity will be used

for the construction activities.

It is also used as expected.

After completion of the

construction, electricity will be

used for residential related

activities.

vii How successful have

you been in ensuring

environmental

compliance from your

sub-contractors or

service providers?

X The sub-contractors and

service providers have

complied with the

environmental regulations as

set out in the EIA and EMP.

2. Atmospheric environment and noise

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices

i Have you been able to

minimize the generation

of waste?

X Limited waste is stored on site.

General construction waste is

produced however the project

site is mostly clean and neat.

Waste will be managed

according to the EMP.

iii How well have you

complied with air quality

targets/ restrictions?

X Air quality is not affected by the

current operations on site. Dust

will be suppressed by grey

water being sprayed especially

on the gravel roads.

vi How well have you

complied with radiation

emission targets/

restrictions?

X Limited to no radiation

emissions is released with the

construction activities on the

proposed project site.

vii

i

How well have you

complied with noise,

vibration, light, or heat

emission targets/

restrictions?

X Construction may only take

place between 7h00 and 18h00

Mondays to Saturdays and not

on Sundays. Limited noise is

produced on site. Limited to no

vibration, light or heat emissions

is produced with the current

operations.

3. Aquatic/Marine

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices

i How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

dredging, straightening

or crossing of

watercourses?

X Watercourses namely

drainage channels have been

kept open to prevent flooding

in the rainy season. Culverts

will be inserted to cross the

channels where required.

iii How successful have

you been in minimising

impacts on the quality,

X Limited water have passed the

project site while construction

was taking place however the

quality, flow and volume of

flow or volume of surface

or groundwater?

surface water will be taken into

account as clean water is a

concern in Namibia.

iii How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

impacts on the intertidal

zone or below the low

water mark of a water

body?

X Limited to no water bodies are

present on the project site.

Flood zones have been taken

into account and construction

will not take place in close

proximity.

iv How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

changes to nutrient or

silt levels in water

bodies?

X No toxic or harmful waste is

stored near the drainage

channels therefore the nutrient

and silt levels will not be

affected by the construction

materials.

v How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

impeding the movement

of aquatic animals?

X Limited to no aquatic animals

are present on or near the

project site.

4. Waste and pollution

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices


able to avoid/limit the

generation of domestic

or industrial wastes?

X Limited industrial or domestic

waste is produced on the site

however any waste produced

on site will be stored in

drums/containers and

transported to a registered

land fill for safe disposal.

ii How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

contaminating soil or

groundwater?

X Soil and groundwater is

protected by means of cement

flooring and plastic containers.

Fluids are stored in containers.

Limited to no soil and

groundwater are contaminated

by the construction.

iii How well have you been


disposal of large

volumes of untreated

sewage or industrial

effluent?

X Limited sewage or industrial

effluent is produced on site.

The sewage system for the

residential activities will still be

constructed and then used.

iv Have you been

successful in avoiding or

reducing the regular use

of substances for pest or

weed control?

X Limited pest or weed control

took place at the site. No

pests or weeds were observed

on the site visit/assessment.

v How successful have

you been in cleaning up

after an accident or

event that caused

pollution?

X Since the construction

activities only started recently,

limited accidents or pollution

events took place.

5. Social and health

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices


able to avoid/limit social

disruptions as a result of

an influx of workers?

X The entire construction site is

fenced off to prevent workers

and staff traveling back and

forth through the residential

area. Working hours

remained between 7h00 and

18h00 and not on Sundays.

ii How successful have

you been in providing

housing, other facilities

and recreation

opportunities for the

workforce?

X The construction workers

reside in town and therefore

limited housing is provided

however transportation is

provided to the workers.

Limited recreation facilities are

provided to the workers.


you been in avoiding or

reducing your activity’s

X Construction activities at the

site are fenced in therefore the

impact on social infrastructure,

negative impact on local

social infrastructure,

such as schools, clinics

and hospitals?

schools, clinics and hospitals

are limited. It is believed that

the families of the workers

may be enrolled in schools

and the workers may visit

clinics and hospitals when

required. The impact on the

facilities will therefore not be

negative.

iv How successful have

you been in improving

the health and wellness

of your workforce?

X The construction site is a safe

and secure working site.

Since the workers receive

payments/salaries they will be

able to visit clinics and

hospitals to enhance their

health and wellness.

v How well have you

managed to improve

knowledge and attitudes

about risky social

behavior amongst your

worker’s and

contractors?

X Induction courses should be

given to the workers and

contractors on how to avoid

risky social behavior in the

working environment and

outside the working

environment.

vi How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

accidents and deaths in

your workforce or

amongst those

employed by your

contractors?

X Limited accidents and no

deaths have taken place on

the proposed construction site.

Safety is a priority on the site.

vii How well have you been


need for involuntary

resettlement?

X The project site/erven has

been vacant before

construction therefore no

resettlement took place.

6. Sensitive areas

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices

How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

impacts on wildlife

reserves/protected/

wilderness areas or

biodiversity corridors?

X The project site was in a

disturbed natural state

therefore limited to no

wildlife/protected/wilderness

areas or biodiversity corridors

were negatively impacted.

How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

impacts on areas with

unique landscape or

scenery?

X The project site does not

consist of unique landscapes

or scenery however it is the

intention of the proponent not

to damage natural areas and

to incorporate the natural

areas into the development.


able to avoid/limit

impacts on residential

areas/ schools/ hospitals

in the vicinity?

X Construction activities at the

site are fenced in therefore the

impact on residential areas,

schools and hospitals are

limited. It is believed that the

families of the workers may be

enrolled in schools and the

workers may visit hospitals

when required. The impact on

the facilities will therefore not

be negative.

ii How successful have

you been in avoiding

antagonisms with

nature-based tourism in

the vicinity?

X The area is not home to

nature-based tourism

activities, the development is

in close proximity to

Otjiwarongo. However tourism

is regarded as an important

source of income and

therefore antagonisms will be

avoided.


you been in avoiding

antagonisms with the

farming community in

the vicinity?

X Farming is regarded as an

important source of income

and therefore antagonisms will

be avoided.

iv How successful have

you been in reducing

your activity’s visual

impact?

X It is the intention of the

developer and proponent to

construct the residential

development as visually

pleasing as possible. Natural

paint colours are used on the

infrastructure.

v How well have you been

able to avoid/limit

impacts on

archaeological features

or historical

monuments?

X The area is not home to

archaeological features or

historical monuments however

in the case that archaeological

features and historical

monuments be discovered on

the site or near the site, it will

be protected.

7. Biodiversity and ecology

# Question

Ab

ove

exp

ecta

tio

n

As e

xpe

cte

d

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

NA




numbered appendices


able to avoid/limit

impacts on plants and

animals, including

endangered species?

X No endangered species were

found on the site or near the

site. All plants and animals

are protected on the site, the

safe removal of animals

especially snakes are

preferred in order to prevent

harm to workers or animals.

ii To what extent have you

been able to minimize

land disturbance during

your activity?

X Land disturbance already took

place before construction

started on the project site

however any further

disturbance will be limited.

Drainage channels were kept

open for water to pass through

the site.


you been in rehabilitating

impacted areas?

X The entire project site will be

developed in manner that will

not have a negative impact on

the environment. The areas

that require rehabilitation will

be rehabilitated in the process.

vi How well have you been

able to avoid/limit veldt

fires?

X No veldt fires have occurred in

the current construction

process. Water is kept on site

to counter possible fires

occurring on the site.

8. Public relations

# Question

Exce

llen

t

Go

od

Dis

ap

po

intin

g

Don

’t

kn

ow

N

A




numbered appendices

i Is your relationship

with local

communities……

X The proponent’s relationship

with local communities is good.

Open communication is kept

between the community and

the developers.

ii Is your relationship

with traditional

authorities……

X Not applicable to this project.

iii Is your relationship

with NGOs ……

X Not applicable to this project.

iv Is your relationship

with sector

ministries……


with sector ministries is good.

Open communication is kept

between the ministries and the

developer.

v Is your relationship

with other

businesses/


with other

businesses/enterprises in the

area is good.

enterprises in the

area …..

Declaration

I……………………………………………………….…. (name in full) understand and

agree that the information that I have provided in this questionnaire will be used by the

Environmental Commissioner to decide whether the Environmental Clearance for activity

can be renewed or not. I accept that the Environmental Commissioner will hold me

accountable for any inaccurate or misleading information knowingly provided in this

questionnaire, and acknowledge that the provision of such information will impede the

lawful carrying out of the responsibilities and functions of the Environmental

Commissioner.

Therefore, I honestly declare that the information that I have provided in this questionnaire

is to the best of my knowledge true and reliable.

Signature:…………………………… Date:…………………………………….

APPENDIX Q: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

appendix a: curriculum vitae of charlie du toit · eia omaruru trade and industrial estate which...

Documents