appendices - jicaopen_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12037966_02.pdf · appendix 23: signed m/m on...
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDICES
LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1: Table of JICA Study Team Members Appendix 2: Table of KAIZEN Unit Members Appendix 3: Complementarity of KAIZEN with Benchmarking and Business Process
Reengineering Appendix 4: Preliminary survey with 60 Candidate Companies and Characteristics by Sector Appendix 5: Change in KAZEN Guidance Programme Appendix 6: Photo Reports First Group Appendix 7: Photo Reports Second Group Appendix 8: Supplementary KAIZEN Guidance programme Appendix 9: KAIZEN Guidance Qualitative Performance Monitoring Report (QPM) Appendix 10: KAIZEN Guidance Participant Questionnaire for understanding KAIZEN Appendix 11: Early Wins Report Pilot Project First Group Appendix 12: Early Wins Report Pilot Project Second Group Appendix 13: KAIZEN Guidance Company Assessment Report Appendix 14: Basic Indicators for Management of Production Appendix 15: Morale Survey with Pilot Company Appendix 16: List of TVET Appendix 17: Newsletters Appendix 18: Signed M/M on Inception Report Appendix 19: Signed M/M on Selection of Companies for Pilot Project Appendix 20: Signed M/M on the Changes in the Selected Companies for the Pilot Project Appendix 21: The Scope of Work Appendix 22: Signed M/M on An Expert for Assistance of Formulation of National Plan of
KAIZEN Appendix 23: Signed M/M on Review of Draft Final Report of The Study on Quality and
Productivity Improvement (KAIZEN) in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia between KAIZEN Unit of Ministry of Industry and JICA Study Team
1/141
Appendix 1
Table of JICA study team members
Name (Period) Title Job description Motokazu Kanokogi (October 2009 – March 2010)
Team leader
Manage the project overall / coordinate with counterpart, local stake folders and other donors. Plan and coordinate seminars / act as a speaker at the seminars. Support execution of study trips to Japan and the third countries. Prepare study reports and manage thereof Assist to prepare the quality and productivity improvement plan (National Plan) Overall management of the Pilot Project. Establish the criteria for selecting the targeted pilot project companies followed by participation of the selection meeting.
Jun Takeyama (July 2010 –) (October 2009-)
Team leader/ Quality and Productivity Improvement No.1
Manage the project overall / coordinate with counterpart, local stake folders and other donors. Plan and coordinate seminars / act as a speaker at the seminars. Support execution of study trips to Japan and the third countries. Prepare study reports and manage thereof Assist to prepare the quality and productivity improvement plan (National Plan) Overall management of the Pilot Project. Establish the criteria for selecting the targeted pilot project companies followed by participation of the selection meeting. Coordinate PP (diagnosis of pilot companies / technology transfer to C/P) implementation. Prepare PP implementing schedule, implement and coordination. Manage technical transfer to KU members Coordinate for the preparation of the quality and productivity improvement manual draft. Prepare the quality and productivity improvement manual draft. Study on specific management skills (such as diagnosis or development of local consultants) Coordinate the KAIZEN technical seminar as a trainer. Support creation of audio visual material scenario.
Katsuyoshi Hamahashi
(July 2010 – )
Sub leader (dissemination and acting for team leader)
Coordination of project planning and implementation Promotion of coordination and cooperation with counterpart Relation management of relation with local stake holders. Relation management of other donors. Support execution of study trips to Japan and the third countries. Prepare and edit of IC/R, PR/R, IT/R and F/R. Coordination and management of counterpart and other stakeholders on construction of dissemination. Support preparation of the national plan system and coordination thereof.
Masanobu Ninomiya
Planning and construction of
Support preparation of the quality and productivity improvement plan (national plan).
2/141
Appendix 1
(October 2009 - ) dissemination (dissemination strategy)
Preparation of the national plan system (study on what to include) Study on a suitable system to promote KAIZEN activity and effective organization. Relation coordination of local stake holders. Relation coordination of other donors. Support to analyze various issues in industries of Ethiopia Problem analysis of legal system in terms of the quality and productivity improvements. Based on the cross-cultural point of view, coordination or support of PP (overall/individuals) as well as participation of seminars (as a trainer).
Akinobu Mizuno (July 2010 - )
Planning and construction of dissemination (audio visual material)
Coordinate preparation of the audio visual material (sub-contract to local consultants ) Survey existing audio visual materials in other countries to advise Ethiopia. Define KAIZEN activities to coordinate related parties. Clarify difference between KAIZEN and BPR/Benchmarking. Prepare KAIZEN stories to coordinate with PP team. Inspect the audio visual material once completed and propose revised plan if necessary. Prepare and manage the audio visual materials.
Yasuhira Takeshi (October 2009 ~ March 2010)
Quality and Productivity Improvement No.2
Prepare implementation plan of PP / implement PP ( advices, monitoring, evaluating, and record PDM recording) Technical transfer to KU members Participate to the preparation of the audio visual material scenario. Participate the company visit / seminar (as a trainer) Support to establish the quality and productivity improvement plan (the national plan)
Takeshi Adachi (July 2010 -)
Quality and Productivity Improvement No.2
Prepare draft of the quality and productivity improvement manual. Prepare implementation plan of PP / implement PP ( advices, monitoring, evaluating, and record PDM recording) Technical transfer to KU members Participate to the preparation of the audio visual material scenario. Participate the company visit / seminar (as a trainer) Support to establish the quality and productivity improvement plan (the national plan).
Toru Tomoshige (October 2009 ~
Sep.2010 )
Quality and Productivity Improvement No.3
Prepare draft of the quality and productivity improvement manual. Prepare implementation plan of PP / implement PP ( advices, monitoring, evaluating, and record PDM recording) Technical transfer to KU members Participate to the preparation of the audio visual material scenario. Participate the company visit / seminar (as a trainer) Support to establish the quality and productivity improvement plan (the national plan).
Hiroshi Ezawa (Oct. 2010 ~ Dec.
2010)
Hiroshi Ezawa (July 2010 ~
Quality and Productivity
Prepare draft of the quality and productivity improvement manual.
3/141
Appendix 1
Sep. 2010) Improvement No.4
Prepare implementation plan of PP / implement PP ( advices, monitoring, evaluating, and record PDM recording) Technical transfer to KU members Participate to the preparation of the audio visual material scenario. Participate the company visit / seminar (as a trainer) Support to establish the quality and productivity improvement plan (the national plan).
4/141
KAIZEN Unit of Ministry of Industry (MOI), Ethiopia
No Name Transferred from Effective from Description
1 Getahun TadesseMetal Industry DevelopmentInstitute
October, 2009 Manager
2 Assefa YimerPrivatization & publicenterprises Supervising Agency
October, 2009 Team leader
3 Sientayehu GashawMetal Industry DevelopmentInstitute
October, 2009Absent from April toJune 2010 due tobusiness trip.
4 Yigedeb AbayMetal Industry DevelopmentInstitute
October, 2009Absent from April toJune 2010 due tobusiness trip.
5 Delo BenkaTextile Industry DevelopmentInstitute
October, 2009
6 Selamawit KirosAgro-processing Department,MOI
October, 2009
7 Zemedkun AklewegChemical Industry DevelopmentDirectorate, MOI
October, 2009Absent from July toSep 2010 due tobusiness trip.
8 Kemila Abdela Privatization & public enterprisesOctober, 2009
9 Samson KebedeLeather Industry DevelopmentInstitute
December,2009
10 Fetene Getachew Leather Industry Development InsFebruary, 2010
* Effective Oct. 2010, Ministry of Trade and Industry is changed its nam
5/141
Appendix 3
Complementarity of KAIZEN relative to Business Process Reengineering (BPR) and
Benchmarking
A study was done in the course of the Study to review differences and complementarity between
KAIZEN versus Business Process Reengineering (BPR) and Benchmarking. BPR and
Benchmarking are the management improvement methods that have been employed in the government
and other sectors in Ethiopia. There were a number of questions asked in the early stage of the
KAIZEN Study regarding how different KAIZEN is relative to BPR or Benchmarking. This material
is an essential summary of the comparative review done in the Study.
1. Differences between KAIZEN relative to BPR and Benchmarking
KAIZEN’s guiding principles BPR / Benchmarking relative to KAIZEN
Integrated and
Cooperative Undertaking:
KAIZEN is an integrated system of cooperative
work among the top, middle managers and
front-line employees.
BPR and Benchmarking are driven by top
management and executed by manager level
personnel.
Genuine Participatory Undertaking:
KAIZEN is based on genuine participation of
frontline workers who play critical roles in
planning, executing, evaluating and standardizing
throughout the improvement efforts.
BPR and Benchmarking are respectively an
intensive top-down effort with senior
management taking the leading role
throughout the process.
Workplace-focused Undertaking:
KAIZEN focuses on the workplace and
encourages improvements of efficiency in existing
resources allowing low cost improvements to
accumulate for significant contribution to the
company goals.
BPR and Benchmarking focus on project
team-based intensive study or best practice
study, and do not focus on
workplace-originated ideas that are normally
piecemeal.
Endless Undertaking:
KAIZEN is an endless undertaking. KAIZEN is
continuous and never-ending activities in
revolving cycles of the PDCA discipline. This is
made possible through the wide employee
participation that promotes self-motivated
initiatives in the entire company. Once put in
place and activated, KAIZEN’s impact is
extremely significant.
BPR and Benchmarking can be a one-time
improvement undertaking. Continuous
undertaking of BPR and Benchmarking is
sometimes recommended, but doing so relies
each time on the top management’s decision
for a new project.
Endogenous Undertaking (towards a new
6/141
Appendix 3
corporate culture):
Practicing KAIZEN in itself naturally leads to a
corporate culture of continually self-innovative
organization and self-motivated workforce.
In BPR and Benchmarking, although creating
a corporate culture of challenge for innovation
is strongly advocated, doing so would mean an
additional management undertaking.
(Source: JICA KAIZEN Study Team)
2. Complementary Aspects of BPR, Benchmarking and KAIZEN
Despite the differences between KAIZEN versus BPR and Benchmarking, they are not incompatible,
but rather they are supplementary to each other.
Having recognised the differences, the discussion below confirms the complementary aspects in
terms of KAIZEN relative to BPR and Benchmarking.
Both BPR and Benchmarking are designed to deal with a situation where a company faces a need for a large-scale change which should be realised in a short period of time. This type of situation may be infrequent, but companies do come across such a situation. KAIZEN does not deal with this type of large-scale, one-off change. Companies should employ an intensive project type method such as BPR or Benchmarking.
KAIZEN may play a role in a large-scale innovation where, for instance, a QC Circle identifies a need for such a change that exceeds the capacity of the QCC and makes a suggestion to the management, which may trigger a management decision to initiate a management-led project using such methods as BPR or Benchmarking.
Benchmarking’s essential concept of learning from advanced practice of other companies may at times be applied in a KAIZEN context such as in QCC activities when developing improvement measures, albeit in a much smaller scale than a typical Benchmarking project.
KAIZEN’s basic methods, such as standardisation for work environment (5S), standardisation of operation and ‘7 Muda’ for elimination of waste, are also effective and useful in BPR and Benchmarking. It can be interpreted that KAIZEN activity may lay a foundation or preparatory stage for effective implementation of BPR and Benchmarking. For instance, accustomed use of QC seven tools will lead the company to enhance data management capability which further contributes towards BPR and Benchmarking.
KAIZEN can be applied on the results of BPR and Benchmarking to make them improve. A Benchmarking method in the form of Collaborative Benchmarking may have many
application possibilities in the dissemination of KAIZEN. Companies interested in learning more KAIZEN application knowledge and techniques can work together to do mutual benchmarking or mutual learning based on experience sharing, similar to Japan’s QC Conference and various study groups organized by trade associations, chambers of commerce & industry and others.
KAIZEN, with its guiding principles of participation and collaboration of all accompanied with
enhanced motivation, can reach to all sectors of industries where diffusion of other management
improvement methods remained limited. KAIZEN has the potential to fill this gap with its call to
movement for quality culture and for industrial development in Ethiopia towards growth and
transformation.
7/141
Appendix 4
Preliminary Survey with 60 Candidate Companies and Characteristics by Sector
1. Preliminary survey with 60 candidate companies
From the initial ‘long list’ consisting of 479 companies prepared by KU, companies which participated the First National KAIZEN seminar and expressed their intention to be a part of the pilot project were filtered as the initial candidates. Then, final confirmation by KU via telephone conversation determined the final candidates of the pilot project companies. The following table shows the list of candidate companies made up of 61 companies in total. Preliminary survey was conducted by means of visiting all the companies with the objective of collecting basic information through questionnaires.
Table-1: 60 Candidate Companies
No Name of Company (alphabetical order) Sub-Sector Sector Total
1 Abyssinia Steel Metal
18
2 Akaki Spare Part and Hand Tools Share Company Metal 3 Alem Steel Pvt. Ltd. Co. Metal 4 Gatepro P.L.C Metal 5 Gelan Metal Industry P.L.C Metal 6 GNM Industry P.L.C Metal 7 Holland Cars P.L.C Metal 8 K.G Engineering P.L.C Metal 9 Kasma Engineering P.L.C Metal 10 Koteba Metal Tools P.L.C Metal 11 Maru Metal Industry P.L.C Metal 12 Mesfin Industrial Engineering P.L.C Metal 13 Nehemia Engineering Metal 14 Ocfa Metal Manufacturing Metal 15 Syntec Ethiopia P.L.C Metal 16 Techtera Engineering P.L.C Metal 17 Walia Steel Industry P.L.C Metal 18 Yesu PLC Metal 19 Ada Flour & Pasta Agro
14
20 Addis mojo edible oil Agro 21 Awash Winery Agro 22 Hilina Enriched Food Agro 23 Kality Food Agro 24 Luna Export Slauter Agro 25 Meta Abo Brewery Agro 26 Misrak flour & Bread Factory Agro 27 Nas Foods Agro 28 Royal Candy Agro 29 Sarem Food Agro 30 Seka business group Agro 31 Sebeta Agro-industry Agro 32 Universal food Agro 33 Adama Spinning Textile
10 34 Akaki garment Textile 35 Ambassador garment Textile 36 Concept international Textile 37 Crown Textile Textile
8/141
Appendix 4
38 Ediget Yam & Sewing Thread Textile 39 Ethio-Japan Textile Textile 40 G seven Trading & Industry Textile 41 Knit to Finish Textile 42 Nazareth Garment Textile 43 Awash Melkassa Aluminium Sulphate and Sulphuric Acid S.C Chemical
12
44 Bekas chemicals Chemical 45 Bekrobe Business Group PLC Chemical 46 East Africa group plc Chemical 47 East African pharmaceutal Chemical 48 Ethio pulp and paper S.C Chemical 49 Kadisco Chemical industries P.L.C Chemical 50 Matador Addis tyre factory Chemical 51 National veternary Institute Chemical 52 Oromia pipe factory plc Chemical 53 OXFORD AMALGATED PLC Chemical 54 Zenit Gebs Eshet Chemical 55 Dire Industries PLC Leather
7
56 ELICO(Ethio Leather Industries PLC) Leather 57 Ethiopia Tannery Leather 58 Mesaco Global Tannery Leather 59 Ramsay Shoes Leather 60 Walia Tannery Leather 61 Wallia Shoes Leather
Total Number of Candidate Companies and Enterprises 61
2. Results of questionnaire from the 60 candidate companies
The general management indicators by sector were summarised from the results of questionnaire as shown below. Capital per head was used here as a replacement of labor equipment ratio (capital expenditure / number of employees). In case some companies did not disclose their indicator such as gross profit per sales, these companies are excluded from the denominator. The average value is calculated by the simple average method.
Table-2 General management indicators of 60 companies by sector
Sector Sub Sector
gross profit
per sales
Sales amount per head
gross profit
per head
capital turnover
ratio
capital per head
unit %Thousand
BirrThousand
BirrTurnover
Thousand Birr
1 Metal Metal 16.9 413 29.7 1.7 3322 Engineering 39.1 379 73.1 2.8 5423 Average 20.2 346 48.2 2.1 4134 Agro Flour Product 10.2 152 26.4 1.5 1315 Others 15.7 268 82.0 4.1 2056 Average 12.1 204 27.8 2.6 1447 Textile Textile 17.5 76.8 15.3 0.7 2538 Garment 27.7 64.7 21.2 0.15 2769 Average 21.6 73.8 17.6 0.6 26010 Chemical Consumer 18.7 263 54.7 2.9 143
9/141
Appendix 4
3. Characteristics by sector
From the general management indicators, characteristics by sector are analysed as follows.
1) Metal sector
“Gross profit per sales” of metal sector is higher than the average of all sectors. Especially for engineering sub sector, the “gross profit per sales” marks the highest among all sectors. The background is strong demand for building materials boosted this sector, especially the engineering sub sector. Metal sector occupies the top position in the “sales amount per head” among all sectors, and ranked number two in the “gross profit per head” following to Chemical sector. Engineering sub sector is also ranked as the highest in this indicator.
“Capital turnover ratio” in this sector shows lower than the average of all sectors, but it is not negative sign. This is because, the average of all sector in capital turnover ratio is boosted by the remarkably higher value of the leather sector. However, capital per head shows approximately twice higher than the average. This is because that companies in this sector require heavy equipments so that the capital turnover ratio of this sector is depressed.
2) Agro-Processing sector
Gross profit per sales of Agro-Processing sector is lower than the average of all sectors, suggesting severe competition among this sector. Both sales amount per head and gross profit per head are significantly below the average of all sectors, suggesting the tough management situation in this sector. Further, while capital per head is remarkably lower than the average of all sectors, capital turnover ratios is still lower than the average. It concluded that the capacity utilisation in this sector can be remarkably low. The reasons of this conclusion may include the difficulty in appropriate procurement of raw material. Another factor may be due to the simple sales channel, capacity utilisation is directly affected by orders from customers. Therefore, companies in this sector need products development to exploit multiple sales channels. Further, streamlining of procurement is required.
3) Textile sector
In this sector, gross profit per sales is higher than the average of all sectors. However, although capital per head is greatly higher than the average of all sectors, both sales amount per head and gross profit per head is significantly lower than the average. Further, capital turnover ratio is the lowest across all the sectors. In summary, as the nature of this sector is labor-intensive, the capacity utilisation is very poor. As the feature of this sector, the upstream industries such as spinning, weaving and garment, is more likely to be capital –intensive, while downstream is more labor-intensive. Therefore, the overview across the sector shows simultaneously one aspect of labor-intensive and another aspect where the capacity utilisation is low. In summary, businesses in this sector have difficulty in
11 Pharmaceutical 8.75 196 14.3 1.3 17812 Others 32.3 360 87.5 3.8 20913 Average 22.2 288 55.3 2.5 17314 Leather Tannery 11.2 379 30.4 10.9 45.615 Shoe 15.0 117 17.5 2.2 53.416 Average 11.8 244 28.2 9.2 47.117 Average of all sectors 17.6 231 35.4 3.4 207
10/141
Appendix 4
management. In order to overcome the situation, the improvement of the capacity utilisation is urgently required.
4) Chemical sector
Chemical sector shows higher than the average of gross profit per sales. On the other hand, the capital per head is lower than the average of all sectors. Further, several indicators including sales amount per head、gross profit per head、capital turnover ratio are higher than the average of all sectors. From the above, this sector is now in booming economy. Specifically, companies like Matador-Addis Tyre, Oromia Pipe Factory that are categorised in ”others” can be considered as in good financial health.
5) Leather sector
Leather sector is the typical labor-intensive industry that shows the lowest capital per head but the highest capital turnover ratio. Another point is poor gross profit per sales and gross profit per head. Specifically, shoe subsector shows remarkably low capital per head compare to the Textile/Garment subsector that is typical labor-intensive industry, indicating disadvantage of their technology.
11/141
Cha
nges
in K
AIZ
EN
Gui
danc
e P
rogr
amm
e(1
) In
itial
KA
IZE
N G
uida
nce
Pro
gram
me
- Ja
nuar
y -
Mar
ch 2
010
Act
ivit
yN
atur
e of
act
ivit
y
1st w
eek
1st v
isit
Inte
rvie
ws
wit
hm
anag
emen
tex
ecut
ives
and
fiel
d in
spec
tion
The
aspi
rati
ons
ofm
anag
emen
tex
ecut
ives
will
behe
ard.
Gap
sbe
twee
nas
pira
tion
san
dre
alit
yw
ill
beid
enti
fied
.C
olle
ctio
nof
info
rmat
ion
and
data
(sha
ring
rele
vant
duti
esw
ith
C/P
)w
ill
bepe
rfor
med
.
1st w
eek
2nd v
isit
Col
lect
ion
ofm
anag
emen
tan
dad
min
istr
atio
nin
form
atio
n,an
dfi
eld
Gap
sbe
twee
nth
ere
alit
yre
cogn
ised
bym
anag
emen
tex
ecut
ives
and
fact
s ob
serv
ed b
y ex
pert
s w
ill b
e id
enti
fied
.
2nd w
eek
Rep
ort/
disc
ussi
on3rd
visi
t(h
alf
day)
Rep
ort/
disc
ussi
on o
f di
agno
sis
resu
ltsIs
sues
and
prob
lem
sex
peri
ence
dby
com
pani
esw
illbe
disc
usse
d,sh
arin
gof
reco
gnit
ion
ofac
tual
cond
itio
nsw
ill
beat
tem
pted
,an
dsp
ecif
icm
etho
dsfo
rre
solu
tion
ofth
esa
me
wil
lbe
disc
usse
d(s
hari
ngof
unde
rsta
ndin
gco
ncer
ning
man
ager
ial
qual
ity)
.
4th v
isit
Dis
cuss
ion
ofm
ulti
ple
mea
sure
sfo
rre
solu
tion
ofis
sues
and
prob
lem
s,pr
esen
tati
onof
nece
ssar
yim
prov
emen
tm
etho
ds,
and
dete
rmin
atio
nof
issu
esan
dpr
oble
ms
to b
e ov
erco
me
Uti
lisa
tion
ofm
anua
ls,
such
asQ
Cst
ory.
Pre
sent
atio
nof
prop
osal
s fo
r co
rres
pond
ing
prog
ram
man
uals
5th v
isit
Det
erm
inat
ion
ofre
solu
tion
prog
ram
prop
osal
san
dco
nfir
mat
ion
ofin
tent
toim
plem
ent
Rev
iew
ing
of th
e co
rres
pond
ing
prog
ram
man
uals
6th v
isit
Spe
cifi
cpl
ans
for
impl
emen
tati
onof
reso
luti
on p
rogr
ams
Con
firm
atio
nof
role
allo
cati
onan
dch
eckp
oint
sup
onim
plem
enta
tion
7th v
isit
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f re
solu
tion
pro
gram
sC
onfi
rmat
ion
ofro
leal
loca
tion
and
chec
kpoi
nts
upon
impl
emen
tati
on
8th v
isit
Impl
emen
tati
on o
f re
solu
tion
pro
gram
sG
uida
nce
for
impr
ovem
ent m
etho
ds
11th
wee
kC
onfi
rmat
ion
9th v
isit
Res
ult c
onfi
rmat
ion
and
stan
dard
isat
ion
Dis
cuss
ion
conc
erni
ngre
sult
san
dco
ntin
uati
onof
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent o
f go
od r
esul
ts
12th
wee
kO
verv
iew
10th
vis
itR
epor
ting
ofco
nclu
sion
san
dge
nera
lov
ervi
ewC
ompl
etio
nm
easu
res,
such
asin
tern
alco
mm
unic
atio
ns,
prep
arat
ion
for
exte
rnal
pub
lic
anno
unce
men
ts, a
nd th
e li
ke
Insp
ecti
on/d
iagn
osi
s
4thto
10th
wee
ks
Gui
danc
e
12/141
Cha
nges
in K
AIZ
EN
Gui
danc
e P
rogr
amm
e
KAI
ZEN
Gui
danc
e Pr
ogra
mm
e - 1
st G
roup
(Jul
y - S
epte
mbe
r) a
nd 2
nd G
roup
(Oct
ber -
Dec
embe
r)
Ste
p (I
– V
)S
essi
on A
gen
da (
Th
eme
/ Act
ion
)S
tep
(I –
V)
Ses
sion
Age
nda
(T
hem
e / A
ctio
n)
11I.
Un
ders
tan
din
g O
verv
iew
of K
AIZ
EN
Ove
rvie
w o
f K
AIZ
EN
S1
I. U
nde
rsta
ndi
ng
Ove
rvie
wof
KA
IZE
NO
verv
iew
of
KA
IZE
NS
25S
S2
5SS
3O
pera
tion
Sta
nda
rd &
Tim
e S
tudy
S3
Ope
rati
on S
tan
dard
& T
ime
Stu
dyS
4E
lim
inat
ion
of
Was
te (
MU
DA
)S
4E
lim
inat
ion
of
Was
te (
MU
DA
)S
5O
rgan
isin
g ‘S
ort’
acti
vity
V5
Org
anis
ing
‘Sor
t’ ac
tivi
tyV
6U
nde
rsta
ndi
ng
‘3S
’ act
ivit
ies
inE
lim
inat
ion
of
MU
DA
V6
Un
ders
tan
din
g ‘3
S’ a
ctiv
itie
s in
Eli
min
atio
n o
f M
UD
AV
7S
tan
dard
isin
g O
pera
tion
s at
Sel
ecte
dW
orkp
lace
V7
Sta
nda
rdis
ing
Ope
rati
ons
at S
elec
ted
Wor
kpla
ceV
8O
rgan
isin
g Q
CC
& S
etti
ng
up
Th
eme
V8
How
toO
rgan
ise
QC
Cir
cles
;W
hat
is Q
C S
tory
?S
9W
hat
isQ
CC
Pre
sen
tati
onM
eeti
ng?
How
are
QC
7 T
ools
uti
lise
d?S
10C
ondu
ctin
g Q
CC
Mee
tin
gV
10P
rese
nti
ng
and
Eva
luat
ing
Res
ult
from
QC
C a
ctiv
ity
V11
Con
duct
ing
QC
C P
rese
nta
tion
Mee
tin
gV
Fol
low
up
bett
er c
ompa
ny
man
agem
ent
Fol
low
up
bett
er c
ompa
ny
man
agem
ent
Rev
iew
K. a
ctiv
itie
s &
com
plem
ent
defi
cien
cy k
now
ledg
e if
nec
essa
ry, e
tc.
Rev
iew
K.
acti
viti
es&
com
plem
ent
defi
cien
cy k
now
ledg
e if
nec
essa
ry, e
tc.
Not
e: S
: Sem
inar
= g
rou
p tr
ain
ing
(gu
idan
ce);
VV: V
isit
to
indi
vidu
al c
ompa
ny,
i.e.
, on
-sit
e tr
ain
ing
(dia
gnos
is &
gu
idan
ce)
V
(3)
Sec
ond
Gro
up
Pla
n (
Oct
ober
– D
ecem
ber)
II. U
nde
rsta
ndi
ng
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
n o
fW
orkp
lace
& O
pera
tion
III.
Im
plem
enti
ng
KA
IZE
NA
ctiv
itie
s at
th
e co
mpa
ny
IV. U
nde
rsta
ndi
ng
Ove
rvie
w o
f Q
CC
12V
. Pre
para
tory
wor
k fo
rC
ompa
ny-
wid
e K
AIZ
EN
acti
viti
esV
V. O
rgan
isin
g Q
CC
Act
ivit
ies
at t
he
Com
pan
y
11V
. Pre
para
tory
wor
k fo
rC
ompa
ny-
wid
e K
AIZ
EN
acti
viti
esV
(2)
Fir
st G
rou
p (J
uly
– S
epte
mbe
r)
II. U
nde
rsta
ndi
ng
Sta
nda
rdis
atio
n o
fW
orkp
lace
& O
pera
tion
III.
Im
plem
enti
ng
KA
IZE
NA
ctiv
itie
s at
th
e co
mpa
ny
IV. O
rgan
isin
g K
AIZ
EN
Act
ivit
ies
at t
he
com
pan
y9
Car
ryin
g ou
t Q
CC
act
ivit
ies
for
con
stru
ctin
g Q
C S
tory
13/141
Reporton
KAIZENProgress
inPilotProjectCom
panies
Agro-ProcessingSector
Sep
9,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-2-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
MO
TIim
plem
ents
Pilo
tPro
ject
with
the
sele
cted
30co
mpa
nies
fort
hepu
rpos
eof
crea
ting
am
anua
land
draf
ting
apl
anto
diss
emin
ate
KAI
ZEN
inth
em
anuf
actu
ring
indu
stry
inEt
hiop
iaan
dco
nduc
ting
rele
vant
tech
nolo
gytr
ansf
erto
KU
mem
bers
.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KAI
ZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:St
anda
rdis
atio
nof
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
t;an
dSt
anda
rdis
atio
nof
oper
atio
n.Fr
omth
epe
rspe
ctiv
eof
Ethi
opia
nK
AIZE
Nad
apta
tion,
itw
asre
cogn
ised
that
thes
ear
eth
em
ostc
ritic
alel
emen
tsth
atne
edto
beun
ders
tood
and
assi
mila
ted
byth
eco
mpa
nies
’key
pers
onne
l.
1.G
roup
trai
ning
cour
se(4
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
str
aini
ngon
the
foun
datio
nof
KAI
ZEN
incl
udin
gth
eab
ove
area
s.2.
Com
pany
visi
tspr
ovid
eon
-site
guid
ance
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
cepr
actic
eof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofbo
thw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
3.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
nga
syst
emof
impl
emen
ting
KAI
ZEN
byth
emse
lves
.Te
chnn
ical
Not
e:Th
etr
ansi
tion
from
stan
dard
isat
ion
activ
ities
toQ
CC
activ
ities
isde
term
ined
inte
rms
ofth
eco
mpa
ny’s
achi
evem
entl
evel
ofst
anda
rdis
atio
nof
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tand
oper
atio
n.If
nots
uffic
ient
,the
com
pany
isto
revi
sitt
hest
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
es.
Implem
entation
andoutcom
e0810110001414
Implem
entation
andoutcom
e
14/141
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eof0810110001614
Implem
entation
andoutcom
e
15/141
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
16/141
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eof0810110001414
Implem
entation
andoutcom
e
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
17/141
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
18/141
Reporton
KAIZENProgress
inPilotProjectCom
panies
MetalSector
Sep
9,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-2-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
MoT
Iim
plem
ents
Pilo
tPro
ject
with
the
sele
cted
30co
mpa
nies
fort
hepu
rpos
eof
crea
ting
am
anua
land
draf
ting
apl
anto
diss
emin
ate
KAI
ZEN
inth
em
anuf
actu
ring
indu
stry
inEt
hiop
iaan
dco
nduc
ting
rele
vant
tech
nolo
gytr
ansf
erto
KU
mem
bers
.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KAI
ZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:St
anda
rdis
atio
nof
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
t;an
dSt
anda
rdis
atio
nof
oper
atio
n.Fr
omth
epe
rspe
ctiv
eof
Ethi
opia
nK
AIZE
Nad
apta
tion,
itw
asre
cogn
ised
that
thes
ear
eth
em
ostc
ritic
alel
emen
tsth
atne
edto
beun
ders
tood
and
assi
mila
ted
byth
eco
mpa
nies
’key
pers
onne
l.
1.G
roup
trai
ning
cour
se(4
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
sth
etr
aini
ngon
the
foun
datio
nof
KAI
ZEN
incl
udin
gth
eab
ove
area
s.2.
Com
pany
visi
tspr
ovid
eon
-site
guid
ance
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
cepr
actic
eof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofbo
thw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
3.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
nga
syst
emof
impl
emen
ting
KAI
ZEN
byth
emse
lves
.Te
chni
calN
ote:
The
tran
sitio
nfr
omst
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
esto
QC
Cac
tiviti
esis
dete
rmin
edin
term
sof
the
com
pany
’sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
Ifno
tsuf
ficie
nt,t
heco
mpa
nyis
tore
visi
tth
est
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
es.
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eof0810125000914
Implem
entation
andoutcom
e
Resultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Aof
ove
rpro
du
ctio
n
2.M
UD
Ao
finv
en
tory
3.M
UD
Ain
tra
nspo
rtat
ion
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-
ma
king
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Ao
fmo
tion
7.M
UD
Ao
fwa
iting
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er(
Tec
htr
a)
Te
chtr
aE
ng
ine
erin
g
19/141
Implem
entation
andoutcom
eImplem
entation
andoutcom
e
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
tK
AIZ
EN’s
prog
ress
and
impr
ovem
ent
20/141
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
tIm
plem
enta
tion
and
outc
ome
of08
1012
4000
414
Impl
emen
tatio
nan
dou
tcom
eRe
sultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Aof
ove
rpro
duct
ion
2.M
UD
Aof
inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
tran
spo
rtat
ion
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-
mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
wai
ting
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er
Gel
an
Me
tal
Indu
stry
Second
First
Impl
emen
tatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
21/141
Impl
emen
tatio
nan
dou
tcom
eK
AIZ
EN’s
prog
ress
and
impr
ovem
ent
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
tIm
plem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
0810
143000
814
Resultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Ao
fo
verp
rodu
ctio
n
2.M
UD
Aof
inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-
ma
king
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
mo
tion
7.M
UD
Aof
wa
itin
g
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er
Sin
tecc
Eth
iopi
a
22/141
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eIm
plem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
081012
4001
004
Resultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Ao
fo
verp
rod
uct
ion
2.M
UD
Ao
fin
vent
ory
3.M
UD
Ain
tra
nsp
orta
tion
4.M
UD
Ao
fdef
ect-
ma
kin
g
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Ao
fmot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
wa
itin
g
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er
Wa
liaS
tee
lIn
dust
ry
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
tIm
plem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
081012
4000
214
Resultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Ao
fo
verp
rod
uct
ion
2.M
UD
Ao
fin
ven
tory
3.M
UD
Ain
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
4.M
UD
Aof
de
fect
-m
aki
ng
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Ao
fm
otio
n
7.M
UD
Ao
fwa
itin
g
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Tar
get
Ale
mIn
trtn
atio
nal
Ste
els
23/141
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
t
24/141
Reporton
KAIZENProgress
inPilotProjectCom
panies
TextileSector
Sep
9,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
MoT
Iim
plem
ents
Pilo
tPro
ject
with
sele
cted
30co
mpa
nies
fort
hepu
rpos
eof
crea
ting
am
anua
land
draf
ting
apl
anto
diss
emin
ate
KAI
ZEN
inth
em
anuf
actu
ring
indu
stry
inEt
hiop
iaan
dco
nduc
ting
rele
vant
tech
nolo
gytr
ansf
erto
KU
mem
bers
.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KAI
ZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:St
anda
rdis
atio
nof
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
t;an
dSt
anda
rdis
atio
nof
oper
atio
n.Fr
omth
epe
rspe
ctiv
eof
Ethi
opia
nK
AIZ
ENad
apta
tion,
itw
asre
cogn
ised
that
thes
ear
eth
em
ostc
ritic
alel
emen
tsth
atne
edto
beun
ders
tood
and
assi
mila
ted
byth
eco
mpa
nies
’key
pers
onne
l.
1.G
roup
trai
ning
cour
se(4
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
str
aini
ngon
the
foun
datio
nof
KAI
ZEN
incl
udin
gth
eab
ove
area
s.2.
Com
pany
visi
tspr
ovid
eon
-site
guid
ance
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
cepr
actic
eof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofbo
thw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
3.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
nga
syst
emof
impl
emen
ting
KAI
ZEN
byth
emse
lves
.Te
chni
calN
ote:
The
tran
sitio
nfr
omst
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
esto
QC
Cac
tiviti
esis
dete
rmin
edin
term
sof
the
com
pany
’sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
Ifno
tsuf
ficie
nt,t
heco
mpa
nyis
tore
visi
tth
est
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
es.
3
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
081011
3002
904
Thiscompany
was
sche
duledforthe
second
grou
p,bu
titw
asde
cide
dto
moveup
forthe
firstgrou
p.GM
iseagertow
ards
KAIZEN
ashe
attend
edtheKA
IZEN
training
inJapan.Thus,
GM
isenthusiasticinincreasin
gtheem
ployee’smotivationandprom
otes
kaize
nactivities
byem
phasising
employee
participation.
Employees’aw
aren
essislifted
bytheKA
IZEN
tree'sAm
haric
poster
andkaize
nslo
ganthat
wereacqu
ireddu
ringthe4-daybasic
training
course.
4
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eRe
sultof
factorydiagno
sis
1.M
UD
Ao
fove
rpro
du
ctio
n
2.M
UD
Ao
fin
ven
tory
3.M
UD
Ain
tran
spor
tatio
n
4.M
UD
Aof
def
ect
-mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Ao
fmo
tion
7.M
UD
Ao
fwa
itin
g
8.3
S
ProcessAssessm
ent
Aft
er
Eth
io-J
apan
(bef
ore)
Second
First
25/141
5
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
Intheon
cedisorderlymod
elworkplace
(mainten
ance
section),theywereableto
secure
anadditio
nalspace
afterthe
prop
erSortactiv
ity.Afterimplem
entin
gtheSet-in-order
activ
ityinthisadditio
nalspace,the
walland
ceiling
werepainted,
paintedshelvesw
ereplaced
,in
which
they
storethevario
uspartssortedinterm
softype.
Theph
otoshow
sthe
satisfactionon
theface
oftheQCC
leader.
6
QCC
leader
explaining
thestateof
5Sactivity
toGM
andothe
rmanagem
ent
staff.
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
GM
andKA
IZEN
core
team
mem
bers
raising
questio
nsat
themeetin
gwith
the
JICAstud
yteam
andKU
.
Collabo
rativeeffortso
fmanagem
ent(GM)a
ndem
ployeesp
rodu
cedgood
results.
7
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
0810
1130
0270
4
Thiscompany
was
also
sche
duledforthe
second
grou
pbu
tmoved
upto
thefirstgrou
p.Not
onlyGM
iseagertow
ards
KAIZEN
,the
KAIZEN
core
team
leader
hadparticipated
inthe
KAIZEN
training
inJapanthat
prom
oted
KAIZEN
activities
actively.
Thecompany
isintheirthird
year
since
establish
ment.Thefactoryisinorde
rand
mod
ern.
8
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eRe
sultof
factorydiagno
sis 1
.MU
DA
ofo
verp
rodu
ctio
n
2.M
UD
Ao
fin
ven
tory
3.M
UD
Ain
tra
nsp
orta
tion
4.M
UD
Ao
fde
fect
-mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
mot
ion
7.M
UD
Ao
fw
aiti
ng
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er
Ada
ma
Spi
nnin
g
Second
First
26/141
9
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
Und
ertheguidance
ofKA
IZEN
core
leader,Sorta
ndSet-in-order
activ
ities
ofmod
elworkplace
have
been
implem
ented.
10
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
AstheKA
IZEN
core
team
unde
rstood
theexecutingmetho
dof
standardising
workenvironm
ent,they
also
startedto
unde
rstand
theim
portance
ofactively
collectideaso
fworkers.Thu
s,weproceede
don
totheguidance
forthe
managem
enta
ndtheem
ployeeso
fthe
team
ontheQCC
activ
ity’sou
tline
and
themetho
dof
itsim
plem
entatio
n.
Und
ertheguidance
ofKA
IZEN
core
team
leader,rules
onlocatio
nof
toolswere
establish
edan
dasuggestio
nsystem
was
introd
uced
.
11
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
081011
300301
4Exam
pleof
Textile
manufacturin
gcompany
Thiscompany
beingthefirstgrou
pcompany
from
thestart,du
ringtheJanu
ary–June
perio
datotalof8
visitsh
adbe
encond
uctedinclud
ingthosedo
neby
KUwhileJIC
Astud
yteam
was
absent.Ho
wever,the
sevisitsd
idno
tresultinconcrete
KAIZEN
implem
entatio
nto
take
hold.Thecompany’sKA
IZEN
activities
re-activated
afterthe
4-daybasic
training
course
inJulyand,throughthesubseq
uent
5visits,KA
IZEN
results
emerged.
Thecompany’sfactoryisoldandno
tgen
erallyinacleancond
ition
.
12
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eRe
sultof
factorydiagno
sis 1.
MU
DA
ofov
erpr
oduc
tion
2.M
UD
Aof
inve
ntor
y
3.M
UD
Ain
trans
porta
tion
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-m
akin
g
5.M
UD
Ain
proc
essi
ng
6.M
UD
Aof
mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
wai
ting
8.3S
ProcessAssessm
ent
Afte
r
Gse
ven
Second
First
27/141
13
Asaresultof
theSortactiv
ity,unn
ecessary
itemswereremoved
from
theon
ceun
tidy
mod
elworkplace
(process
ofmanufacturin
gsparepartsfor
repair).New
shelvesfor
finishe
dprod
uctswerealso
placed
.
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
SpecificKA
IZEN
outcom
esstartedto
comeou
tduringthecourse
ofthecurrentv
isits.
14
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
t
Asaresultof
theSet-in-order
activity
,stand
ardisedlocatio
narrangem
entw
asestablish
edforthe
necessaryite
ms.
This
ledto
redu
cedsearchingtim
e.Aw
aren
ess
ofsafety
also
increasedwith
theworkers’w
alkw
aysc
learlysecuredintheworkplace.
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
t
With
theKA
IZEN
core
team
leader’sleadership,the
Shineactiv
ities
areim
plem
ented.
Sche
dulesheetsforthe
Shineactivities
atthemod
elworkplace.
KAIZEN
core
team
leader
settingup
the
KAIZEN
board.
1516
Exam
pleof
Garm
entm
anufacturin
gcompany
Thecompany
was
also
sche
duledforthe
second
grou
p,bu
tmoved
upto
startfrom
July.
Asthegarm
entm
anufacturin
gisalabo
r-intensiveindu
stry,visibleKA
IZEN
improvem
entsare
expe
cted
from
standardisa
tionof
workenvironm
enta
ndop
eration.
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
eof
081011
3003
114
Cuttingprocess
28/141
17
Implem
entatio
nan
dou
tcom
e
Resultof
factorydiagno
sis 1.
MU
DA
ofov
erpr
odu
ctio
n
2.M
UD
Aof
inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
tran
spor
tatio
n
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-m
akin
g
5.M
UD
Ain
proc
essi
ng
6.M
UD
Aof
mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
wai
ting
8.3S
ProcessAssessm
ent
Afte
r
Am
bass
ador
Second
First
18
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
tDu
ringtheSortactivity,unn
ecessary
itemsw
erecollected
intheho
ldingarea,
andthen
separatedby
category
anddisposed
ofinaccordance
with
the
pred
etermined
disposalmetho
ds.
19
KA
IZEN
’spr
ogre
ssan
dim
prov
emen
t
With
theSet-in-order
activity,rawmaterialswereplaced
into
theprop
erlocatio
nsby
prod
ucttypeun
dern
ewrules.
Thishasresultedinredu
cedsearchingtim
e.
Asthene
xtstep
,zon
edivide
rliningforthe
storagearea
ofrawmaterialsisplan
ned
usingthetaping
metho
d.Th
etape
shavealreadybe
enorde
red.
29/141
PPhotoReport
PilotProject
KAIZENGuidance
Textile&AgroSector
24,Dec,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-2-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
Min
istr
yof
Indu
stry
impl
emen
tsPi
lotP
roje
ctw
ithth
ese
lect
ed30
com
pani
esfo
rthe
purp
ose
ofes
tabl
ishi
nga
met
hod
ofK
AIZE
Ngu
idan
ce,
crea
ting
am
anua
lfor
such
Gui
danc
e,an
ddr
aftin
ga
plan
todi
ssem
inat
eK
AIZE
Nin
the
man
ufac
turin
gin
dust
ryin
Ethi
opia
,as
wel
las
cond
uctin
gre
leva
ntte
chno
logy
tran
sfer
toK
Um
embe
rs.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KAI
ZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
ent;
and
Stan
dard
isat
ion
ofop
erat
ion.
From
the
pers
pect
ive
ofEt
hiop
ian
KAI
ZEN
adap
tatio
n,it
was
reco
gnis
edth
atth
ese
are
the
mos
tcrit
ical
elem
ents
that
need
tobe
unde
rsto
odan
das
sim
ilate
dby
the
com
pani
es’k
eype
rson
nel.
1.In
itial
grou
ptr
aini
ngco
urse
(4-d
ayse
min
ar)p
rovi
des
the
trai
ning
onth
efo
unda
tion
ofK
AIZE
Nin
clud
ing
the
abov
ear
eas.
2.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
prov
ide
on-s
itegu
idan
cein
conj
unct
ion
with
mod
elw
orkp
lace
prac
tice
ofst
anda
rdis
atio
nof
both
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tand
oper
atio
n.3.
Mid
-term
grou
ptr
aini
ng(2
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
sba
sic
know
ledg
eof
QC
Circ
le.
4.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
ngth
emse
lves
forp
ract
icin
gK
AIZE
Nby
them
selv
esin
aco
mpa
ny-w
ide
scal
eon
aco
ntin
ualb
asis
.Te
chni
calN
ote:
The
tran
sitio
nfr
omst
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
esto
QC
Cac
tiviti
esis
dete
rmin
edin
term
sof
the
com
pany
’sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
Ifno
tsuf
ficie
nt,t
heco
mpa
nyis
tore
visi
tthe
stan
dard
isat
ion
activ
ities
.
First
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810110001304)
<Standardisation
ofWorkplace
EnvironmentandOperation>
Afte
rco
mp
letin
g4
-day
initi
alt
rain
ing
cou
rse,
the
stud
yte
amvi
site
dea
chco
mp
any
togi
vepr
actic
algu
idan
ceon
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
ent
and
ope
ratio
n.
-3-
Bas
ed
onth
ein
itia
lass
essm
ent
atth
est
art
ofgu
idan
cean
dth
est
atu
sbe
fore
star
ting
QC
Cac
tiviti
es,w
ed
eem
edth
at
the
com
pany
isre
ady
for
QC
Ca
ctiv
itie
s.A
sth
isco
mpa
nya
chie
ved
alm
osta
llta
rge
ts,
we
deci
ded
tost
art
the
QC
Cst
ep.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
We
sele
cted
the
prep
arat
ion
and
pack
ing
lines
asth
em
odel
wor
kpla
ces.
The
bigg
estp
robl
emth
eco
mpa
nyfa
ces
isth
atno
crite
ria,
stan
dard
sor
rule
sha
vebe
ense
tup.
-4-
30/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)A
ctiv
ity>
Att
hefir
stvi
sit,
we
expl
aine
dto
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
the
proc
edur
eof
Sor
t(se
iri)
activ
ityan
das
kth
emto
clea
rlyse
tthe
crite
riath
roug
hth
eac
tivity
.
We
conf
irmed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
carr
ied
outS
ort
(sei
ri)ac
tivity
acco
rdin
gto
our
guid
ance
and
clea
rlyse
tthe
crite
riato
judg
ene
cess
ary
and
unne
cess
ary
thin
gs.
-5-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-6-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)A
ctiv
ity>
We
conf
irmed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
mem
bers
unde
rsta
ndth
epr
oced
ures
and
carr
ied
out
Sor
t(s
eiri)
and
Set
-in-O
rder
(sei
ton)
activ
ities
appr
opria
tely
.
Wor
kers
actu
ally
foun
dbe
nefit
sfr
omS
ort(
seiri
)an
dS
et-in
-Ord
er(s
eito
n)ac
tiviti
esth
atm
ade
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
ttid
yan
dco
mfo
rtab
lew
ithw
ider
wor
king
area
.
-7-
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810110001514)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mp
letin
g4-
day
initi
alt
rain
ing
cou
rse
,the
stud
yte
am
visi
ted
each
com
pan
yto
give
prac
tical
guid
anc
eon
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
ork
pla
cee
nviro
nmen
tan
do
pera
tion.
Th
eco
mpa
ny
did
nota
chie
ve50
%of
the
targ
etin
som
eev
alu
atio
nite
ms.
Ho
wev
er,
we
deem
edth
atth
eco
mp
any
wa
sfu
llyca
pabl
eof
impl
emen
ting
QC
Ca
ctiv
itie
san
dde
cide
dto
star
tgu
idan
ce.
-8-
First
Second
31/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Statusobserved
inthefirstvisit>
Th
isco
mp
any
sele
cte
dth
esp
are
part
sst
ock
roo
man
dpr
oduc
tpr
oces
sing
line
asth
em
ode
lw
ork
plac
es.I
nth
ep
rod
uct
pro
cess
ing
line,
the
pac
kag
ing
line
was
deem
edto
requ
ireim
prov
eme
nts
inp
artic
ular
.Alth
oug
hth
est
ock
room
wa
ste
rrib
lyu
ntid
yb
efor
eK
AIZ
EN
,we
saw
agr
eat
chan
gein
the
follo
win
gvi
sitw
ithS
ort
and
Se
t-in
-ord
erin
plac
e.
-9-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)A
ctiv
ity>
At
the
first
visi
t,w
eex
pla
ined
toK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amth
ep
roce
dur
eof
Sor
t(s
eiri)
activ
ityan
das
kth
em
tocl
ear
lyse
tth
ecr
iteria
toju
dge
nec
essa
ryan
dun
nece
ssa
ryth
ing
sth
rou
ghth
eac
tivity
soth
atun
nece
ssa
ryth
ings
can
be
prop
erly
disp
osed
.
We
conf
irm
edth
atK
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
amca
rrie
dou
tS
ort(
seiri
)ac
tivity
acc
ordi
ngto
our
guid
anc
ean
dcl
ear
lyse
tth
ecr
iteria
toju
dge
nec
essa
ryan
dun
nec
essa
ryth
ings
.H
ow
eve
r,w
efo
und
that
the
com
pan
yne
eds
tofu
rthe
rre
visi
tpl
aces
tost
ock
part
san
dto
ols.
-10-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-11-
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810110001214)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mpl
etin
g4
-da
yin
itial
trai
ning
cour
se,
the
stud
yte
amvi
site
dea
chco
mp
any
tog
ive
pra
ctic
alg
uida
nce
on
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ron
men
tan
dop
erat
ion.
We
dete
rmin
edth
atth
isco
mpa
nyis
rea
dyfo
rQ
CC
activ
ities
.W
ede
cid
edto
star
tth
epr
actic
algu
idan
ceon
QC
Cac
tiviti
esin
the
next
visi
t.
-12-
32/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<AfterSort(seiri)andSet-in-order(seiton)Activities>
The
line
reno
vatio
npr
ojec
tw
asin
itiat
edin
the
bisc
uit
prod
uctio
nlin
eth
atm
ade
itha
rdto
coor
dina
tew
ithK
AIZ
EN
grou
p.A
sth
epr
ojec
tcha
irper
son
was
assi
gned
also
asth
ech
airp
erso
nof
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
,tw
oac
tiviti
esar
efin
ally
wel
l-coo
rdin
ated
.
Ful
l-fle
dge
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
es
have
noty
etim
plem
ente
dex
cept
deve
lopm
ent
ofth
est
aff
trai
ning
plan
.
-15-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Thi
sco
mpa
ny
was
priv
atis
ed
onl
y6
-mon
thag
oa
ndst
illin
the
tran
sitio
nalp
roce
ss.T
his
prev
ent
edth
ech
airp
erso
nof
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mfr
om
atte
ndi
ngth
em
eet
ing
ato
urfir
stvi
sit.
The
cha
irpe
rson
wa
sre
pla
ced
inth
ene
xtvi
sit,
sho
win
gth
at
the
com
pan
yw
asin
the
orga
nis
atio
nalt
urm
oil.
-13-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<QC
CA
ctiv
ities
>T
his
com
pany
sele
cted
the
spar
epa
rts
sto
ckro
oman
dd
own
stre
ambi
scu
itpr
oduc
tion
line
asth
em
ode
lwor
kpla
ces.
How
eve
r,w
efa
ced
org
anis
atio
nal
turm
oili
nclu
din
gre
tirem
ent
ofth
est
ock
room
ma
nag
erim
me
diat
ely
afte
rh
isre
spon
sibl
elin
ew
as
sele
cted
asth
em
ode
lw
orkp
lace
. Sto
ckro
omh
ardl
yim
prov
ed
Sto
ckro
omre
ma
ins
untid
y
We
final
lyde
cide
dto
free
zeK
AIZ
EN
inth
esp
are
part
sst
ock
room
tent
ativ
ely
and
tofo
cus
onM
aint
ena
nce
and
Tool
Ro
om.H
owev
er,
full-
fledg
edK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
hav
en
otye
tst
arte
d.
-14-
33/141
PPhotoReport
PilotProject
KAIZENGuidance
ChemicalSector
24,Dec,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-2-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
Min
istr
yof
Indu
stry
impl
emen
tsPi
lotP
roje
ctw
ithth
ese
lect
ed30
com
pani
esfo
rthe
purp
ose
ofes
tabl
ishi
nga
met
hod
ofK
AIZE
Ngu
idan
ce,
crea
ting
am
anua
lfor
such
Gui
danc
e,an
ddr
aftin
ga
plan
todi
ssem
inat
eK
AIZE
Nin
the
man
ufac
turin
gin
dust
ryin
Ethi
opia
,as
wel
las
cond
uctin
gre
leva
ntte
chno
logy
tran
sfer
toK
Um
embe
rs.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KA
IZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
ent;
and
Stan
dard
isat
ion
ofop
erat
ion.
From
the
pers
pect
ive
ofEt
hiop
ian
KAI
ZEN
adap
tatio
n,it
was
reco
gnis
edth
atth
ese
are
the
mos
tcrit
ical
elem
ents
that
need
tobe
unde
rsto
odan
das
sim
ilate
dby
the
com
pani
es’k
eype
rson
nel.
1.In
itial
grou
ptr
aini
ngco
urse
(4-d
ayse
min
ar)p
rovi
des
the
trai
ning
onth
efo
unda
tion
ofK
AIZE
Nin
clud
ing
the
abov
ear
eas.
2.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
prov
ide
on-s
itegu
idan
cein
conj
unct
ion
with
mod
elw
orkp
lace
prac
tice
ofst
anda
rdis
atio
nof
both
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tand
oper
atio
n.3.
Mid
-term
grou
ptr
aini
ng(2
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
sba
sic
know
ledg
eof
QC
Circ
le.
4.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
ngth
emse
lves
forp
ract
icin
gK
AIZE
Nby
them
selv
esin
aco
mpa
ny-w
ide
scal
eon
aco
ntin
ualb
asis
.Te
chni
calN
ote:
The
tran
sitio
nfr
omst
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
esto
QC
Cac
tiviti
esis
dete
rmin
edin
term
sof
the
com
pany
’sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
Ifno
tsuf
ficie
nt,t
heco
mpa
nyis
tore
visi
tthe
stan
dard
isat
ion
activ
ities
.
PlantAssessm
entResults
(0810120001914)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mpl
etin
g4
-day
initi
altr
ain
ing
cou
rse,
the
stud
yte
am
visi
ted
each
com
pany
tog
ive
pra
ctic
alg
uid
ance
onst
and
ard
isa
tion
of
wo
rkpl
ace
envi
ronm
ent
and
oper
atio
n.
Sin
ceth
isco
mpany
ach
ieve
d50%
ofth
eta
rgetin
all
eva
luatio
nite
ms,
we
deci
ded
tost
art
guid
ance
on
QC
Cact
iviti
es.
-3-
1.M
UD
Aof
Ove
rpro
duct
ion
2.M
UD
Aof
Inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
Tran
spor
ting
4.M
UD
Aof
Def
ect-
Mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
Pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
Mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
Wai
ting
8.
PlantAssessm
ent
(Kadisco)
Th
isco
mpa
nyas
sig
ned
the
own
er’s
son
asK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eT
eam
Lea
der.
He
stu
die
din
the
UK
and
isw
ellm
otiv
ate
dto
pro
mot
eK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
.H
ese
tup
KA
IZE
Nm
eetin
gro
omin
the
mo
del
wor
kpla
cea
ndp
rep
are
d5S
Act
ion
Pla
nbe
fore
our
visi
t.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
mem
ber
lista
nd5S
Act
ion
Pla
nd
ispl
ayed
inK
AIZ
EN
mee
ting
room
34/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Thr
ough
our
obse
rvat
ion
ofth
em
odel
wor
kpla
ces,
we
deem
edth
atth
epr
oble
mlie
sw
ithno
stan
dard
sor
rule
sse
tup
inth
isco
mpa
ny.
-5-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
1>
Thr
ough
3Sac
tiviti
esim
plem
ent
edby
QC
Cm
embe
rs,M
ixin
gM
achi
ne
sect
ion
isfu
llytid
ied
up.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2>T
hrou
gh
3Sa
ctiv
ities
impl
emen
ted
byQ
CC
mem
bers
,Adh
esiv
ese
ctio
nis
fully
tidie
dup
.Act
iviti
esal
soco
ntrib
ute
dto
prev
entin
goi
llea
kan
dre
duci
ngm
anuf
actu
ring
hou
rsby
half
(fin
ding
from
Tim
eS
tudy
).
<Cha
nge
inW
orkp
lace
Layo
utus
ing
Stan
dard
Ope
ratio
nSh
eet>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
prep
ared
the
stan
dar
dop
erat
ion
shee
tba
sed
onth
ecu
rren
tw
orkf
low
inM
ixin
gm
achi
nefo
rco
nstr
uctio
npa
int
sect
ion,
whi
chhe
lped
them
find
Mud
a(w
aste
)in
tran
spor
ting.
Toch
ang
eth
ew
orkp
lace
layo
ut,
the
core
team
mem
bers
requ
este
dth
ere
nova
tion
sect
ion
tom
ake
nece
ssar
yeq
uipm
ent.
Sta
ndar
dO
pera
tion
Sh
eet
befo
rech
ang
e
-8-KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mm
emb
ers
exp
lain
ing
deta
ilsan
de
ffect
so
fw
ork
pla
cela
you
tch
ang
e
On-siteGuidanceRecords
35/141
•KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mto
okin
itiat
ive
toho
ldin
-hou
seK
AIZ
EN
sem
inar
sin
Am
hari
cfo
rst
aff.
•The
core
team
mem
bers
also
pre
par
ed
KA
IZE
NH
and
book
inco
oper
atio
nw
ithQ
CC
lead
ers.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<All-
com
pany
KA
IZEN
Prom
otio
nalA
ctiv
ity>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
Lead
erpr
esen
ting
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
esw
ithP
PT
mat
eria
lfor
in-h
ouse
sem
inar
s
<QC
CA
ctiv
ities
inth
eco
urse
ofA
ll-co
mpa
nyK
AIZ
ENPr
omot
iona
lA
ctiv
ities
>In
the
cour
seof
QC
Cac
tiviti
es,Q
CC
mem
bers
draf
ted
coun
term
easu
res
toad
dres
sw
orkp
lace
prob
lem
sid
entif
ied
inea
chw
orkp
lace
.
QC
Cm
eetin
gin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
1
Th
roug
hQ
CC
grou
pdi
scus
sio
n,Q
CC
me
mbe
rsdr
afte
dth
ea
ctio
np
lan
incl
udi
ngch
ang
esin
wor
kpla
cela
you
to
fth
epi
gm
ent
stor
ero
om
,w
ork
flow
tota
keou
tpig
me
ntfr
omdr
ums
and
pig
me
nttr
ans
port
atio
nto
the
mix
ing
tan
ka
mo
ngo
ther
s.B
ased
onth
ed
rafte
da
ctio
npl
an,t
here
nova
tion
sect
ion
isto
ma
kene
cess
ary
equ
ipm
ent.
-10-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
KU
givi
nggu
idan
cein
QC
Cm
eetin
g
<Afte
rAll-
com
pany
KA
IZEN
Prom
otio
nalA
ctiv
ities
>1
)K
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amm
embe
rsre
pai
nted
the
floo
ro
fall
fact
orie
s.2
)T
he
safe
tysi
gnis
intr
odu
ced
inris
kyw
orkp
lace
sus
ing
solv
ents
oth
at
the
fire
extin
gui
sher
ise
asily
loca
ted.
3)
QC
Cm
embe
rsot
her
than
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
sa
lso
star
ted
3Sa
ctiv
itie
son
avo
lun
tary
basi
s.
2.S
afet
yS
ign
-11-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
1.A
ll-co
mpa
nyac
tion
for
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tal
imp
rove
men
t
3.V
olu
ntar
yK
AIZ
EN
Act
iviti
es
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810115002614)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mpl
etin
g4
-day
initi
altr
aini
ng
cour
se,t
he
stu
dyte
amvi
site
de
ach
com
pany
togi
vep
ract
ica
lgui
dan
ceon
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
env
iron
men
tand
ope
ratio
n.
Att
hest
art
ofg
uida
nce,
3Sac
hie
vem
entl
evel
oft
his
com
pan
yw
asa
sses
sed
aro
und
10%
orle
ss.T
hrou
gh
ent
husi
astic
effo
rts
ma
dein
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
es,t
heac
hie
vem
entl
evel
rea
ched
ove
r75
%at
the
end
of3
-day
visi
ts.W
ithth
isco
nfir
med
,we
deci
ded
tost
art
QC
Cst
age.
-12-
1.M
UD
Aof
Ove
rpro
duc
tion
2.M
UD
Aof
Inve
ntor
y
3.M
UD
Ain
Tra
nspo
rtin
g
4.M
UD
Aof
Def
ect
-M
akin
g
5.M
UD
Ain
6.M
UD
Aof
Mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
Wai
ting
8.3
S
36/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Th
isco
mpa
nya
ssig
ned
the
own
er’s
son
as
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
Lea
der
.He
onc
ep
artic
ipat
edin
the
trai
nin
gco
urs
eh
eld
inJa
pan
and
isw
ellm
otiv
ate
dto
pro
mo
teK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
with
enth
usi
asm
.
Th
isco
mpa
nym
anuf
actu
res
tan
ned
leat
her,
wh
ich
ison
eo
fmaj
or
indu
stri
esin
Eth
iopi
a.
90%
oft
he
pro
duc
tsfr
om
this
com
pan
ya
refo
rex
port
.To
mee
tcus
tom
ers
’d
ema
nds
,qu
ality
con
trol
dat
aar
ew
ellm
ain
tain
ed
and
trac
eab
ility
ise
nsu
red.
3S
ofw
ork
pla
cee
nviro
nmen
tha
sno
tbe
enin
pla
cein
the
raw
mat
eria
lst
ore
sect
ion
,sem
i-m
anu
fact
ure
dpr
oduc
tsto
rese
ctio
na
ndpr
odu
ctio
nlin
esa
ndop
erat
ion
has
notb
een
sta
ndar
dis
ed
.
-13-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Thr
oug
hou
ro
bse
rva
tion
inm
ode
lwo
rkp
lace
s,w
ed
eter
min
ed
tha
tth
epr
oble
mlie
sw
ithn
ost
and
ardi
satio
nim
ple
men
ted
inw
orkp
lace
env
iron
me
nt.
-14-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
1>
Thr
ough
3Sac
tiviti
esim
plem
ente
dby
QC
Cm
embe
rs,
the
raw
mat
eria
lsto
rese
ctio
nh
asbe
enco
mpa
rtm
ent
alis
edso
that
each
raw
mat
eria
lis
sto
red
inth
efix
edlo
catio
nin
apr
edet
erm
ine
dqu
antit
y.T
his
allo
we
dto
stre
amlin
eth
ew
orkf
low
with
FIF
Oth
oro
ughl
yap
plie
dto
raw
mat
eria
lman
agem
ent.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2>T
hrou
gh3S
activ
ities
impl
emen
ted
byQ
CC
mem
bers
,th
ew
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
ent
was
impr
oved
and
wor
kef
ficie
ncy
was
incr
ease
d.T
heef
fect
sfr
om3S
activ
ities
conv
ince
dQ
CC
mem
bers
ofth
eef
fect
sof
QC
Cac
tiviti
es,
mak
ing
them
inte
ntly
liste
nto
KU
mem
bers
.
37/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Cha
nge
inW
orkp
lace
Layo
utus
ing
Stan
dard
Ope
ratio
nSh
eet>
Sta
nda
rdO
per
atio
nS
hee
tbe
fore
KA
IZE
NS
tand
ard
Op
erat
ion
Sh
eet
afte
rK
AIZ
EN
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
prep
are
dth
est
and
ard
oper
atio
nsh
eet
for
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2.B
ase
don
this
shee
t,th
ey
cha
nged
the
wo
rkpl
ace
layo
uto
fad
diti
vech
emic
alst
ore
sect
ion
tha
tin
crea
sed
wo
rkef
ficie
ncy.
QC
Cm
embe
rsvo
lunt
arily
impl
eme
nted
the
seco
ndK
AIZ
EN
ste
pto
furt
her
incr
eas
ew
ork
effic
ienc
y.
•Thiscompany
voluntarily
deployed
3Sactivities
in2
workplaces(Chemicalrawmaterialstoresectionand
Tanningprocess)inadditiontomodelworkplaces.
•QCCteam
swereorganisedadditionally
todeploy
QCC
activities
in3otherw
orkplaces(finalproductstoreand
finishing
sections
andleatherthickness
cutting
process).
•On-siteGuidanceRecords
<All-
com
pany
KA
IZEN
Prom
otio
nalA
ctiv
ities
>
Ch
emic
alra
wm
ater
ials
tore
sect
ion
afte
r3
Sac
tiviti
esQ
CC
lead
era
ndK
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am
mem
ber
exp
lain
ing
3Sac
tiviti
es
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<QC
CA
ctiv
ities
inth
eco
urse
ofA
ll-co
mpa
nyK
AIZ
ENPr
omot
iona
lA
ctiv
ities
>K
Uan
swer
ing
ques
tions
from
QC
Cm
embe
rsin
each
mod
elw
orkp
lace
onho
wto
impl
emen
tQ
CC
activ
ities
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810120002214)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Aft
erco
mp
letin
g4-
day
initi
alt
rain
ing
cour
se,
the
stud
yte
amvi
site
de
ach
com
pan
yto
give
pra
ctic
algu
ida
nce
on
sta
nda
rdis
atio
no
fw
orkp
lace
env
iron
me
ntan
dop
era
tion.
Att
hest
art
ofgu
idan
ce,3
Sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
this
com
pany
was
asse
ssed
ata
rou
nd25
%.A
fter
enth
usia
stic
effo
rts
inK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
,the
achi
evem
ent
leve
lrea
ched
75%
inea
che
valu
atio
nite
mor
over
50%
inov
eral
leva
lua
tion
atth
ee
ndof
3-d
ayvi
sits
.With
this
con
firm
ed,w
ed
ecid
eto
sta
rtQ
CC
sta
ge.
-20-
1.M
UD
Aof
Ove
rpro
duct
ion
2.M
UD
Aof
Inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
Tran
spor
ting
4.M
UD
Aof
Def
ect-
Mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
Pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
Mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
Wai
ting
8.
PlantAssessm
ent
(Zenith)
Afte
r
Bef
ore
38/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Th
isco
mpa
ny
assi
gne
dth
eo
wn
er’s
son
as
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mL
eade
r.H
eo
nce
part
icip
ate
din
the
trai
nin
gco
urs
ehe
ldin
Jap
an
an
dis
we
llm
otiv
ate
dto
pro
mo
teK
AIZ
EN
act
iviti
esw
ithe
nthu
sia
sm.
Th
isco
mpa
ny
pro
duc
es
cosm
etic
pro
duct
s(h
air
oil,
sha
mp
oo,
etc
.)a
nd
exp
ort
sth
em
too
the
rco
unt
rie
s.
Man
yfe
ma
lew
ork
ers
ma
nua
llyfil
lpro
duc
tsin
con
tain
ers,
whi
chch
ara
cte
rises
the
lab
or-i
nte
nsi
vepl
ant
.
Pla
stic
con
tain
ers
are
mo
lded
byin
-ho
use
mol
din
gm
ach
ine
s.
3S
activ
itie
sh
ave
notb
ee
nim
ple
men
ted
inth
em
anu
alfil
ling
sect
ion,
sem
i-m
anu
fact
ure
dpr
odu
ctst
ore
sect
ion
and
pro
du
ctio
nlin
es
and
ope
ratio
nh
asn
otye
tbee
nst
and
ard
ise
d.
-21-
•Manyprocessesarelabor-intensiveandtheproblemlies
with
nostandardsandrulesinplace.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Man
yfe
mal
ew
ork
ers
ma
nua
llyfil
lliq
uid
cosm
etic
prod
uct
sin
toco
nta
iner
s.M
ale
wor
kers
cru
shra
wm
ater
ials
into
pie
ces
with
axes
.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
activ
ities
inM
odel
Wor
kpla
ce1
(1)>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mto
okin
itiat
ive
toim
ple
men
tKA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
esin
aph
ased
man
ner
base
don
the
pre
pare
dK
AIZ
EN
Act
ion
Pla
n.
Se
mi-
au
tom
atic
too
lwas
ma
de
toim
pro
veth
em
anu
alfil
ling
pro
cess
bytr
iala
nd
err
or.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
1(2
)>K
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am
too
kin
itia
tive
toim
ple
me
nt
KA
IZE
Na
ctiv
itie
sin
ap
ha
sed
ma
nn
erb
ase
do
nth
epr
ep
are
dK
AIZ
EN
Act
ion
Pla
n.
Man
ual
raw
mat
eria
lcru
shin
gta
skha
sbe
enre
pla
ced
with
the
crus
her
mad
ein
-hou
se.T
his
dra
stic
ally
incr
ease
dw
ork
effic
ienc
y.
39/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2(1
)>K
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amto
okin
itiat
ive
toim
plem
ent
KA
IZE
Na
ctiv
ities
ina
pha
sed
man
ner
base
do
nth
epr
epa
red
KA
IZE
NA
ctio
nP
lan.
The
mol
ding
mac
hin
ese
ctio
nw
as
com
part
men
talis
ed,
mak
ing
spac
esto
plac
em
olde
dpl
astic
s.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2(2
)>K
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
amto
okin
itia
tive
toim
ple
me
nt
KA
IZE
Na
ctiv
itie
sin
ap
ha
sed
man
ne
rb
ase
do
nth
ep
rep
are
dK
AIZ
EN
Act
ion
Pla
n.
3Sac
tivity
was
impl
emen
ted
inSp
are
part
sst
ore
sect
ion.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKAI
ZEN
Activ
ities
Impl
emen
ted
inw
orkp
lace
sot
hert
han
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
s>K
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
wer
eal
soim
plem
ente
din
mol
ded
plas
tics
and
tem
pora
rygo
ods
stor
ese
ctio
ns.
The
righ
tpho
tosh
ows
the
fem
ale
wor
ker
impl
emen
ted
this
KA
IZE
Nac
tivity
.
<All-
com
pany
KA
IZEN
Prom
otio
nalA
ctiv
ities
>
On-siteGuidanceRecords
KU
mem
ber
lect
urin
gba
sics
ofK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
inA
mha
ricat
an
in-h
ouse
sem
ina
rhe
ldfo
r40
supe
rvis
ors
KU
mem
ber
answ
erin
gqu
estio
nsfr
omQ
CC
mem
bers
atQ
CC
mee
ting
40/141
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810120001704)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Aft
erco
mp
letin
g4
-da
yin
itia
ltra
inin
gco
urse
,th
est
udy
team
visi
ted
eac
hco
mp
any
tog
ive
pra
ctic
alg
uid
ance
on
sta
nda
rdis
atio
no
fw
ork
pla
ceen
viro
nm
en
tan
dop
era
tion
.
Att
hest
arto
fgui
danc
e,3S
ach
ieve
men
tlev
elof
this
com
pany
was
asse
ssed
at40
%or
less
.Afte
ren
thus
iast
ice
ffort
sin
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
es,t
heac
hiev
emen
tlev
elre
ach
ed
75%
inea
chev
alua
tion
item
or50
%in
the
over
alle
valu
atio
nat
the
end
of3
-day
visi
ts.W
ithth
isco
nfirm
ed,w
ede
cide
dto
star
tQC
Cac
tiviti
es.
-29-
1.M
UD
Aof
Ove
rpro
duct
ion
2.M
UD
Aof
Inve
nto
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
Tran
spor
ting
4.M
UD
Aof
Def
ect-
Mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
Pro
cess
ing
6.M
UD
Aof
Mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
Wai
ting
8.
PlantAssessm
ent
(EAG)
Aft
er
Bef
ore
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Th
eG
Mo
fth
isco
mp
any
isre
spo
nsib
lefo
rK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
am.H
epa
rtic
ipat
ed
inth
etr
aini
ngco
urs
ehe
ldin
Jap
anan
dis
wel
lmo
tivat
ed
topr
omot
eK
AIZ
EN
act
iviti
esw
ithen
thu
sias
m.
Th
isco
mpa
nypr
odu
ces
laun
dry
soap
asth
ech
em
ical
divi
sion
ofE
ast
Afr
ican
Gro
up,a
cong
lom
era
teho
ldin
gm
any
man
ufa
ctu
ring
div
isio
n.
Th
ech
em
ical
pro
cess
isop
era
ted
with
equ
ipm
ent.
On
the
oth
erh
and
,se
ctio
nsin
clud
ing
palm
oil
fillin
g,w
ork
-in-p
roce
ssgo
ods
tra
nspo
rtb
etw
een
proc
ess
es,
and
fina
lpro
duct
pack
agi
nga
rehi
ghl
yla
bor
inte
nsiv
e.
3Sw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enth
asno
tbee
nin
plac
ein
man
ual
fillin
gpr
oce
ssan
dw
ork-
in-p
roce
ssgo
ods
sect
ions
and
prod
uctio
nlin
e.O
pera
tion
has
not
yetb
een
stan
dard
ise
d.
-30-
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
Th
rou
gh
ou
ro
bse
rvat
ion
ofth
em
od
elw
orkp
lace
s,w
ed
ee
me
dth
att
he
pro
ble
mlie
sw
ithn
ost
an
da
rds
an
dru
les
seti
nth
isco
mp
any
.
-31-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
•T
hefig
ure
belo
wsh
ows
the
actio
npl
ande
velo
ped
byK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eT
eam
.
•T
heow
ner
and
the
due
are
setf
orea
chth
eme.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
41/141
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
1>
Mai
nte
nanc
ese
ctio
nha
sbe
en
seti
no
rder
aft
er3S
act
ivity
impl
eme
nted
byQ
CC
me
mbe
rs.
On-siteGuidanceRecords
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rKA
IZEN
Act
iviti
esin
Mod
elW
orkp
lace
2>Q
CC
mem
bers
are
mak
ing
cart
sby
tria
land
erro
rto
redu
cew
orkl
oads
oflo
adin
gpa
lmoi
lbar
rels
(wei
ghin
g18
0kg
per
barr
el).
42/141
PPhotoReport
PilotProject
KAIZENGuidance
MetalSector
24,Dec,2010
The
DevelopmentStudy
onQuality/ProductivityImprovem
ent
(KAIZEN)intheFederalDem
ocraticRepublic
ofEthiopia
-2-
MainContentsofKAIZENGuidance
JIC
ASt
udy
Team
inco
llabo
ratio
nw
ithK
Uof
Min
istr
yof
Indu
stry
impl
emen
tsPi
lotP
roje
ctw
ithth
ese
lect
ed30
com
pani
esfo
rthe
purp
ose
ofes
tabl
ishi
nga
met
hod
ofK
AIZ
ENgu
idan
ce,
crea
ting
am
anua
lfor
such
Gui
danc
e,an
ddr
aftin
ga
plan
todi
ssem
inat
eK
AIZE
Nin
the
man
ufac
turin
gin
dust
ryin
Ethi
opia
,as
wel
las
cond
uctin
gre
leva
ntte
chno
logy
tran
sfer
toK
Um
embe
rs.
Purpose
ofPilotProject
Basicpolicy
Methodofguidance
The
KAI
ZEN
guid
ance
was
desi
gned
with
apa
rtic
ular
focu
son
the
area
sof
:Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
ent;
and
Stan
dard
isat
ion
ofop
erat
ion.
From
the
pers
pect
ive
ofEt
hiop
ian
KA
IZEN
adap
tatio
n,it
was
reco
gnis
edth
atth
ese
are
the
mos
tcrit
ical
elem
ents
that
need
tobe
unde
rsto
odan
das
sim
ilate
dby
the
com
pani
es’k
eype
rson
nel.
1.In
itial
grou
ptr
aini
ngco
urse
(4-d
ayse
min
ar)p
rovi
des
the
trai
ning
onth
efo
unda
tion
ofK
AIZ
ENin
clud
ing
the
abov
ear
eas.
2.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
prov
ide
on-s
itegu
idan
cein
conj
unct
ion
with
mod
elw
orkp
lace
prac
tice
ofst
anda
rdis
atio
nof
both
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tand
oper
atio
n.3.
Mid
-term
grou
ptr
aini
ng(2
-day
sem
inar
)pro
vide
sba
sic
know
ledg
eof
QC
Circ
le.
4.C
ompa
nyvi
sits
inco
njun
ctio
nw
ithm
odel
wor
kpla
ceQ
CC
activ
ities
assi
stth
eco
mpa
nyin
orga
nisi
ngth
emse
lves
forp
ract
icin
gK
AIZE
Nby
them
selv
esin
aco
mpa
ny-w
ide
scal
eon
aco
ntin
ualb
asis
.Te
chni
calN
ote:
The
tran
sitio
nfr
omst
anda
rdis
atio
nac
tiviti
esto
QC
Cac
tiviti
esis
dete
rmin
edin
term
sof
the
com
pany
’sac
hiev
emen
tlev
elof
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
erat
ion.
Ifno
tsuf
ficie
nt,t
heco
mpa
nyis
tore
visi
tthe
stan
dard
isat
ion
activ
ities
.
-3-
Changes
inPP
<Poi
nts
deem
edas
effe
ctiv
e>B
efo
rest
art
ing
com
pa
ny
visi
ts,
4-d
ay
gro
up
trai
nin
gco
urs
ew
as
he
ldto
incr
ea
sekn
owle
dge
ofK
AIZ
EN
bas
ics.
Sin
ceth
istr
ain
ing
was
pro
ven
effe
ctiv
ein
on-s
iteg
uid
an
ce,2
-da
yg
rou
ptr
ain
ing
cou
rse
wa
sa
dde
dto
tra
nsf
erp
rep
ara
tion
ste
ps
be
fore
sta
rtin
ggu
ida
nce
onQ
CC
activ
ities
.
Fin
din
gsin
com
par
ison
with
the
prev
iou
sP
P
<Ref
lect
ions
>S
ome
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
ms
org
an
ise
din
com
pan
ies
we
resl
ow
tom
ake
resp
ons
es
that
gav
en
ega
tive
impa
cts
inK
AIZ
EN
imp
lem
enta
tion
.A
mon
gva
riou
sca
use
s,th
efo
llow
ing
isre
gard
ed
as
influ
en
tiali
npa
rtic
ula
r.1
)D
eci
sio
n-m
aki
ng
rig
htis
no
tgra
nte
dto
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
m2
)E
mpl
oye
esa
ren
ota
war
eo
fth
en
eed
ofa
ll-co
mpa
ny
supp
ort
sin
KA
IZE
Na
ctiv
itie
s3
)E
mpl
oye
esa
ren
ota
war
eo
fth
eim
port
ance
ofvo
lun
tary
effo
rts
toso
lve
issu
es.
With
the
ab
ove
caus
es
inm
ind,
ab
riefin
gse
ssio
nw
ash
eld
for
GM
sin
vite
dfr
om
sele
cted
com
pa
nie
sp
rior
toP
Pg
uid
ance
;on
this
occ
asi
on,
we
exp
lain
ed
PP
purp
ose
s,th
esu
ppo
rtsy
stem
that
shou
ldb
ep
rep
are
din
com
pan
ies
an
dro
les
ofK
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am.
PlantAssessm
entResults
0810125000314
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mpl
etin
g4
-day
initi
altr
aini
ngco
urse
,the
stud
yte
amvi
site
dea
chco
mpa
nyto
give
pra
ctic
algu
idan
ceon
stan
dard
isat
ion
ofw
orkp
lace
envi
ronm
enta
ndop
era
tion.
Thi
sco
mp
any
faile
dto
achi
eve
50%
of
the
targ
eti
nso
me
eva
luat
ion
item
s.H
ow
eve
r,co
nsi
derin
gth
eon
goin
gef
fort
s,w
ede
cide
dto
star
tth
egu
idan
ceo
nQ
CC
activ
ities
.
1.M
UD
Aof
over
pro
duc
tion
2.M
UD
Ao
finv
ento
ry
3.M
UD
Ain
tran
spor
tatio
n
4.M
UD
Aof
defe
ct-
mak
ing
5.M
UD
Ain
6.M
UD
Aof
mot
ion
7.M
UD
Aof
wai
ting
8.3
S
Process
Assessm
ent
Aft
er
Ga
tepr
o
Second
-4-
43/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
Stat
usob
serv
edin
the
first
visi
tT
hrou
ghou
rob
serv
atio
nof
the
mod
elw
orkp
lace
s,w
ede
emed
that
the
prob
lem
lies
with
nocr
iteria
,st
anda
rds
and
rule
sse
tin
this
com
pan
y.
-5-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)a
ctiv
ity>
Att
hefir
stvi
sit,
we
expl
ain
edto
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
the
proc
edur
eof
Sor
t(se
iri)
activ
ityan
das
kth
emto
clea
rlyse
tth
ecr
iteria
thro
ugh
the
act
ivity
.
We
conf
irmed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
carr
ied
out
Sor
t(se
iri)
activ
ityac
cord
ing
toou
rg
uida
nce
and
clea
rlyse
tth
ecr
iteria
toju
dge
nece
ssar
yan
dun
nece
ssar
yth
ings
-6-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-7-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)a
ctiv
ities
>W
eco
nfirm
ed
tha
tKA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
mem
bers
unde
rsta
nd
the
pro
cedu
res.
We
exp
lain
ed
the
pro
cedu
reof
Se
t-in
-ord
er(s
eito
n)a
ctiv
ityan
da
sked
the
mto
carr
you
tS
et-i
n-or
der
(sei
ton)
act
iviti
esap
prop
riate
ly.
We
conf
irmed
that
the
wor
kpla
ceen
viro
nmen
tha
sbe
enim
prov
edth
roug
hco
ntin
ued
Sor
t(se
iri)
activ
ityle
dby
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
alon
gw
ithS
et-in
-ord
er(s
eito
n)ac
tivity
.
-8-
44/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-9-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rcha
nges
inw
orkp
lace
layo
ut>
We
gave
guid
ance
toK
AIZ
EN
Core
Team
on
how
toim
pro
veth
ew
ork
pla
cela
yout
inth
em
odelw
ork
pla
ceas
the
next
step.W
eask
ed
them
toco
mple
teth
eta
sk.
Wo
rkp
lace
La
you
tO
n-si
teG
uid
anc
eW
eco
nfir
med
thatth
eco
rete
amm
em
bers
dra
fted
the
work
pla
cela
yout.
Sin
ceth
ew
ork
pla
cehas
notbeen
com
part
menta
lised
,w
egave
on
-site
guid
ance
on
com
part
menta
lisatio
nby
dra
win
glin
es
on
the
floor
with
chalk
.In
the
guid
ance
,w
eem
pha
sise
dth
eim
port
ance
of
confir
min
gopera
bili
tyand
opera
tors
’opin
ions.
-10-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
We
con
firm
ed
tha
tthe
3S
wo
rkpl
ace
env
iron
me
nth
as
been
inp
lace
inm
any
wo
rkpl
ace
s.W
eex
plai
ned
ope
ratio
nals
tan
dard
isat
ion
and
pur
pos
ea
ndp
roce
du
reo
fQ
CC
activ
itie
sto
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
m.
The
core
team
mem
bers
prom
ised
that
they
wou
ldco
ntin
ueK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
with
thor
ough
sort
(sei
ri)an
dse
t-in
-ord
er(s
eito
n)in
min
d.
-11-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-12-
45/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
ndar
dO
pera
tion
Shee
t>B
ase
do
nth
est
and
ard
ope
ratio
nsh
eet
draf
ted
by
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
m,w
ega
veg
uida
nce
onth
ede
tails
inco
mpa
riso
nw
ithac
tual
ope
ratio
n.
We
poin
ted
out
som
edi
scre
pan
cies
betw
een
the
act
ualw
orkp
lace
layo
ut
and
the
wor
kflo
wde
scrib
edin
the
stan
dar
dop
era
tion
shee
t.W
eal
sopo
inte
dou
ttha
tK
AIZ
EN
poin
tsa
reno
tcl
ear
due
toto
ob
roa
ddi
visi
ons
ofo
per
atio
n.T
he
core
team
mem
bers
prom
ised
tore
vie
wth
est
and
ard
ope
ratio
nsh
eet
base
don
our
advi
ces.
-13-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<QC
CA
ctiv
ities
>T
heco
rete
am
me
mb
ers
deve
lope
dth
ea
ctio
npl
an
for
QC
Ca
ctiv
ityba
sed
on
the
sta
ndar
do
pera
tion
shee
twith
the
pur
pos
eo
fel
imin
atin
gM
uda
(was
tes)
and
impr
ovin
gw
ork
effi
cie
ncy.
Wo
rkpl
ace
toim
ple
men
tQC
Cac
tivity
Inre
view
ing
the
act
ion
plan
,w
ega
vesu
ppl
emen
tale
xpla
natio
nto
fillk
now
ledg
eg
aps
foun
din
the
plan
.
-14-
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810129000514)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Aft
er
com
ple
ting
4-d
ay
initi
alt
rain
ing
cou
rse
,th
est
ud
yte
am
visi
ted
ea
chco
mp
an
yto
giv
epr
actic
alg
uid
an
ceon
stan
da
rdis
atio
no
fw
ork
pla
cee
nvi
ron
me
nt
an
do
pera
tion
.
We
deem
edth
atth
isco
mp
any
isre
ady
for
star
ting
QC
Ca
ctiv
ities
.W
ew
illg
ive
prac
tical
guid
ance
onQ
CC
activ
ities
fro
mth
ene
xtvi
sit.
-15-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
We
con
firm
ed
that
this
com
pan
yca
rrie
so
utva
riou
sac
tiviti
es
volu
nta
rily
;h
owe
ver,
we
deem
edth
atth
epr
oble
mlie
sw
ithno
effe
cts
actu
ally
bor
nin
the
wor
kpla
ce.
We
dec
ided
tog
ive
ab
asic
gu
ida
nce
on
wor
kpla
ceim
pro
vem
entt
oK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
am.
-16-
46/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)a
ctiv
ities
>A
tth
efir
stvi
sit,
we
exp
lain
ed
toK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amth
ep
roce
dur
eo
fS
ort
(sei
ri)a
ctiv
ityan
da
skth
em
tocl
ear
lyse
tth
ecr
iteri
ath
rou
ghth
ea
ctiv
ityto
dete
rmin
en
ece
ssar
ya
ndu
nnec
ess
ary
thin
gs
soth
at
unne
cess
ary
thin
gsca
nbe
prop
erly
disp
ose
d.
We
conf
irmed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
carr
ied
outS
ort
(sei
ri)ac
tivity
acco
rdin
gto
our
guid
ance
and
clea
rlyse
tthe
crite
riato
judg
ene
cess
ary
and
unne
cess
ary
thin
gs.
How
eve
r,pl
aces
stoc
king
part
san
dto
ols
need
furt
her
revi
ew.
-17-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-18-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)a
ctiv
ities
>W
eco
nfirm
ed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
me
mbe
rsun
ders
tan
dth
epu
rpo
ses
ofS
ort
(sei
ri)an
dS
et-
in-o
rder
(sei
ton)
act
iviti
es.T
hey
are
als
oaw
are
of
the
need
ofw
orkp
lace
layo
utin
ord
erto
elim
ina
teM
uda
(was
tes)
inop
era
tion
.
We
deem
ed
that
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
mem
ber
sunder
stand
the
import
ance
of
elim
inat
ing
Mud
ain
opera
tion
by
deve
lopin
gth
ew
ork
pla
cela
yout.
-19-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-20-
47/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mis
wel
law
are
of
the
imp
ort
an
ceo
fw
ork
pla
cee
nvi
ron
me
nt
imp
rove
me
nt
thro
ug
h5S
act
iviti
es.T
hey
are
con
sid
erin
ga
new
wo
rkpl
ace
layo
ut
usin
gth
est
and
ard
op
era
tion
shee
t.
We
ga
vegu
idan
ceon
mis
sin
gco
mp
one
nts
by
com
pa
ring
the
sta
nd
ard
op
era
tion
shee
tp
rep
are
db
yth
em
with
the
actu
alo
per
atio
n.
We
chec
ked
som
eta
sks
fou
nd
as
Mud
a(w
aste
s)in
the
shee
t.T
heco
rete
amm
em
bers
are
awa
reo
fth
em
an
de
xpla
ined
KA
IZE
Np
lan
tou
s.W
eco
nfir
me
dth
at
they
are
ma
kin
gfu
llu
seo
fth
est
an
dard
op
era
tion
shee
t.
-21-
Highlightsseen
inKAIZENofthisCom
pany
Th
rou
gh5S
activ
itie
san
dth
est
anda
rdo
per
atio
nsh
eet
,th
eco
mpa
ny
ste
adily
imp
rove
sw
orkp
lace
en
viro
nmen
tan
do
per
atio
n.
-22-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<QC
CA
ctiv
ities
>K
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amex
pla
ined
us
that
the
yw
ould
carr
you
tQC
Cac
tiviti
esw
ithth
epu
rpos
eof
red
ucin
gcu
stom
erco
mp
lain
ts.
We
dee
med
that
the
yun
der
stan
dpr
oce
dure
so
fQC
Cac
tiviti
esan
dho
wto
use
data
.H
ow
eve
r,th
eyar
est
illsh
ort
ofkn
ow
ledg
eo
nst
ruct
urin
gpr
esen
tatio
nm
ate
rials
and
targ
etse
tting
.W
ega
vesu
pple
me
ntal
gui
danc
eto
fills
uch
insu
ffici
ency
.
-23-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Vol
unta
ryA
ctiv
ities
>K
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am
are
we
llaw
are
oft
he
imp
orta
nce
of
sta
fftr
ain
ing
.B
ase
don
thei
raw
aren
ess
,th
ey
he
ldtr
ain
ing
sess
ions
toe
xpla
inp
urp
ose
so
fth
ea
ctiv
itya
ndb
asic
kno
wle
dg
epr
ior
tost
art
of
act
ivity
.
We
aske
dth
em
wha
tth
ey
thin
kd
rast
icch
ang
esse
enin
the
mo
delw
orkp
lace
sth
rou
ghth
eP
Pac
tiviti
es.
Th
ey
poin
ted
out
tha
tth
efo
cus
ofco
nve
ntio
nal
in-h
ous
eac
tiviti
esh
ad
bee
non
how
tom
otiv
ate
emp
loye
es.
Ho
wev
er,
the
yfo
un
dth
rou
ghth
eP
Pac
tiviti
esth
at
the
env
iron
me
nt
imp
rove
me
ntis
effe
ctiv
ein
incr
eas
ing
both
wor
ke
ffici
ency
and
emp
loye
es’
mot
iva
tion
.
-24-
48/141
PlantAssessm
entResults(0810129000614)
<Sta
ndar
disa
tion
ofW
orkp
lace
Envi
ronm
enta
ndO
pera
tion>
Afte
rco
mp
letin
g4
-day
initi
alt
rain
ing
cour
se,
the
stu
dy
tea
mvi
site
de
ach
com
pan
yto
giv
ep
ract
ica
lgu
ida
nce
on
sta
nda
rdis
atio
nof
wor
kpla
cee
nvi
ron
me
nt
and
ope
ratio
n.
We
dee
med
that
this
com
pany
isre
ady
for
star
ting
QC
Cac
tiviti
es.
We
will
star
tth
epr
actic
alg
uid
anc
eon
QC
Cac
tiviti
esfr
omth
ene
xtvi
sit.
-25-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Sta
tus
obse
rved
inth
efir
stvi
sit>
We
con
firm
ed
that
this
com
pany
volu
ntar
ilyim
ple
men
ted
Sor
t(s
eiri)
and
Set
-in-
orde
r(s
eito
n)ac
tiviti
es
afte
r4
-da
ytr
ain
ing
cou
rse.
Bas
ed
onth
eas
sess
me
ntre
sults
,we
told
them
tha
tth
ey
we
refu
llyre
ady
for
QC
Cac
tiviti
es.
We
dec
ide
dto
give
tho
roug
hgu
ida
nce
toK
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am
on
ope
ratio
nst
and
ardi
satio
n.
-26-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Afte
rSor
t(se
iri)a
ndSe
t-in-
orde
r(se
iton)
Act
iviti
es>
We
expl
aine
dto
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mth
ene
edof
clea
rS
ort
(sei
ri)st
anda
rds.
Inad
ditio
n,w
ee
xpla
ined
mis
sin
gco
mp
onen
tsof
Set
-in-o
rder
(sei
ton)
activ
ities
.
With
good
unde
rsta
ndin
go
four
guid
ance
,K
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amup
grad
edth
eir
activ
ities
toa
high
erle
vel.
The
ypr
ohib
ited
empl
oyee
sfr
ompl
acin
gpr
odu
cts
and
inve
ntor
ydi
rect
lyon
the
floor
.
-27-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-28-
49/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Nee
dof
Stan
dard
ised
Ope
ratio
n>W
eex
plai
ned
toK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amth
atth
est
anda
rdop
erat
ion
shee
the
lpth
emfin
dM
uda
(was
tes)
inop
erat
ion.
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
mem
bers
unde
rsta
ndth
atfig
ures
are
part
icul
arly
impo
rtan
tin
the
stan
dard
oper
atio
nsh
eet.
Bas
edon
this
,the
yst
arte
dac
tiviti
esto
elim
inat
eM
uda
(was
tes)
inop
erat
ion.
-29-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Rev
iew
ofw
orkp
lace
layo
ut>
We
ask
edK
AIZ
EN
Cor
eTe
amto
draf
tth
ew
ork
pla
cela
you
tb
yst
ream
linin
gw
ork
flow
s.T
hey
revi
ew
ed
oper
atio
nan
dre
no
vate
dth
ew
ork
pla
cela
you
t.
The
yfo
und
Mud
ain
tra
nspo
rtin
gin
the
curr
ent
wor
kpla
cela
yout
.T
hey
dis
cuss
edth
en
eww
ork
pla
cela
yout
toel
imin
ate
Mud
a. -30-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Rev
iew
ofw
orkp
lace
layo
ut>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Team
draf
ted
the
wor
kpla
cela
yout
bych
angi
ngth
elo
catio
nsof
sub
-as
sem
bly
proc
ess
and
tool
sto
stre
amlin
ew
orkf
low
s.
The
ydi
dn’t
mea
sure
wor
king
time
befo
rech
angi
ngth
ew
orkp
lace
layo
ut.T
hus,
noda
taw
asav
aila
ble
tom
easu
reef
fect
sin
impr
ovin
gw
ork
effic
ienc
yfr
omch
ange
sin
the
wor
kpla
cela
yout
.T
hey
cam
eto
unde
rsta
ndth
ene
edof
data
befo
rech
ange
sfo
rco
mpa
rison
.
-31-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
-32-
50/141
On-siteGuidanceRecords
<Ext
raor
dina
ryO
pera
tion>
KA
IZE
NC
ore
Tea
mfu
llyun
de
rsta
nd
sth
eim
por
tanc
eo
fst
an
dar
dis
atio
no
fw
ork
pla
cee
nvi
ron
men
ta
ndo
per
atio
nan
dst
ead
ilyu
pg
rad
es
thei
ra
ctiv
ityle
vel.
How
eve
r,th
ep
rod
uct
ion
line
wa
sin
cha
os
due
toex
trao
rdin
ary
gov
ern
me
nta
lpur
chas
eo
rde
rs.
We
advi
sed
them
that
they
hav
eto
expl
ain
emp
loye
es
on
the
back
gro
und
of
ext
raor
din
ary
ope
ratio
ns.
We
emp
hasi
sed
the
impo
rtan
ceo
finf
orm
atio
np
rovi
sion
par
ticu
larl
yto
prev
ent
empl
oye
esfr
omvi
ola
ting
rule
s.
-33-
On-siteGuidanceRecords
The
yex
plai
ned
usth
att
hey
wou
ldca
rry
outQ
CC
activ
ities
ino
rder
tosh
orte
nca
rre
ctifi
catio
nw
ork
time
.T
hey
prep
ared
the
actio
npl
anon
how
toad
dres
sth
eis
sue
for
the
pres
enta
tion
purp
ose
tous
.
Par
eto
Cha
rtfo
rth
eis
sue
Fis
hbon
ed
iag
ram
toso
lve
the
issu
e
Thr
ough
thei
rpr
esen
tatio
n,w
efo
und
that
they
didn
’tfu
llyun
ders
tand
how
tous
eF
ishb
one
Dia
gram
.T
hus,
we
expl
aine
dth
emth
est
eps
and
poin
tsto
note
inde
velo
ping
Fis
hbon
eD
iagr
amus
ing
the
issu
efa
mili
arto
them
.The
yun
ders
tand
our
expl
anat
ion
and
prom
ised
tore
view
the
act
ion
pla
n.
-34-
FutureChallenges
<Res
ults
from
PPac
tiviti
es>
<P
repa
ratio
nfo
rg
uid
ance
>F
rom
the
resu
ltsof
PP
act
iviti
esin
Me
talc
omp
anie
s,th
efo
llow
ing
poin
tssh
ould
beco
nsi
dere
din
the
futu
rep
roje
ctto
sust
ain
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
esaf
ter
on-s
itegu
idan
ce:
1)T
heco
mpa
ny’s
key
pers
onn
els
houl
dun
ders
tan
dho
wto
org
anis
eK
AIZ
EN
Co
reTe
am2)
Nee
dto
mak
eem
plo
yees
und
erst
and
the
impo
rtan
ceof
volu
nta
rye
ffort
sto
solv
eis
sues
3)N
eed
toco
nfir
mm
oral
ofco
mpa
nie
sin
impl
em
entin
gK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
<C
ons
ide
ratio
no
fpr
oduc
tty
pes>
Inth
em
eta
lin
dust
ry,
mar
ket
dem
ands
topr
odu
cts
ofte
nde
term
ine
succ
ess
ofK
AIZ
EN
activ
itie
s.F
orco
mpa
nie
sm
anuf
actu
ring
pro
duct
sw
ithhi
gher
dem
and
ssu
cha
sco
nst
ruct
ion
mat
eria
ls,
whi
chca
nb
eso
ldw
ithno
par
ticul
ar
effo
rts,
KA
IZE
Nac
tiviti
esa
ren
otre
ally
criti
cala
nd
sust
ain
abili
tyof
such
act
iviti
esis
gre
atly
dep
ende
nt
onpr
odu
ctio
nst
atu
ses.
KA
IZE
Na
ctiv
ities
insu
chse
gme
nts
requ
irest
ron
gw
illof
ow
ners
orG
Ms
top
rom
ote
KA
IZE
N.
Bef
ore
star
ting
gui
dan
ce,
we
nee
dto
det
erm
ine
ifth
eco
mpa
ny’s
key
pers
onne
lhas
solid
mo
tivat
ion
toim
ple
men
tK
AIZ
EN
activ
ities
.
-35-
51/141
2011
/7/1
0 1
Feed
back from
com
pany
employee
s:
‐Sup
ervisor
Before th
e supp
lemen
tary guidance, QCC
had
bee
n cond
ucted in th
e workplace, b
ut not 5S. Problem
s at
workplace w
eren
’t really so
lved
by do
ing just QCC
. With
the guidance by KU
, 5S has successfully bee
n reintrod
uced
in th
e workplace, a
nd that’s
leading us to
elim
inate MUDA
and
make op
e ration mo re efficient. It is
clearly
und
erstoo
d that sustaining 5S
activities in
the workplace is
impo
rtant.
・Worker
5S has m
ade the work easier. It h
as changed
the
workplace to a safer p
lace th
an before. O
ur 5S activ
ities are
still only 50
% of w
hat we want to do. W
e want to try ma ny mo re ideas.
Prog
ress of K
AIZEN at the
Com
pany after Guida
nce by
KU
The supp
lemen
tary guidance allowed
KU m
embe
rs to
gain furthe
r expe
riences re
quire
d of KAIZEN con
sulta
nts.
In su
mmary, 2/3 of K
U m
embe
rs (5
to 6 m
embe
rs) can no
w be placed
at the
level of ‘KA
IZEN
Con
sulta
nt’ (le
vel III),
while other m
embe
rs are com
fortably at the
level of ‘Assistant Con
sulta
nt’ (level II).
・Through the pilot p
r oject activities till Decem
ber 2
010,
1/3 of KU m
embe
rs were view
ed to
be at le
vel III.
・Through cond
uctin
g supp
lemen
tary guidance programmein M
arch‐A
pril
2011
, 2/3 of KU m
embe
rs are now
view
ed at level III.
Six KU
mem
bers partic
ipated
in th
e supp
lemen
tary guidance. 2
/3 of the
m m
ay be view
ed to
have reache
d level
III. C o
nsidering othe
rs w
ho did not partic
ipated
the
plan, som
e of who
m are at level III, 2/3 of the
who
le KU
mem
bers can
be placed
at ‘KA
IZEN
Con
sulta
nt’ (le
vel lll).
Prog
ress in
KU m
embe
rs’ con
sulting
cap
ability
Guida
nce by
KU 1
Materials were just m
ixed
out. Sort o
ut th
ese according to th
eir usage.
Guida
nce by
KU 2
Delineate storage area, passage area, and
working
area to increase
the op
erationa
l efficiency an
d safety.
Guida
nce by
KU 3
Keep
ing shinning
floor helps to
iden
tify
from
whe
re dirt com
es.
Appendix 8
52/141
2011
/7/1
0 2
Guida
nce by
KU 4
Paintin
g an
d de
lineatin
g the flo
or
clearly
defines rules.
Guida
nce by
KU 5
Draw line
s an
d de
fine rules to
implem
ent the first‐in
/ first‐out system.
Guida
nce by
KU 6
The red tags will help iden
tify un
necessary ite
ms.
Fina
lly, it is confirm
ed th
at rules are set in
the
workplaces so th
at th
e em
ployees no
w have
clear u
nderstan
ding
of the
purpo
se and
the
proced
ures of the
activities.
Appendix 8
53/141
Appendix 9
1
KAIZEN Guidance Qualitative Performance Monitoring Report
1. Survey result
1.1 First Pilot Project Group
54/141
Appendix 9
2
1.2 Second Pilot Project Group
55/141
Appendix 9
3
2. QPM Rader Chart by Sector
2.1. First Pilot Project Group
2.2. Second Pilot Project Group
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Basic Cources
Standardisation of Workplace Environment
Standardisation of Operation
Elemination of MUDA & other tools:Importance of sustained activitiesQCC Senimar
QCC Activities
Pereparatory work for company‐wide KAIZEN
Metal Sector
Agro Sector
Textile Sector
Chemical Sector
Leather Sector
QP Radar chart of sectors at Feb/'11
56/141
Appendix 9
4
Comments
① Understanding of both “Basic Courses Seminar” and ”QCC Seminar, as well as practical
implementation of “Standardisation of Workplace Environment”, “Standardisation of Operation”
and “Elimination of MUDA & other tools” shows very positive results with higher than 50% in all
sectors.
② On the other hand, the average value of “QCC activities” implementation is lower than 50%.
③ Further, the average value of “Preparatory work for company-wide KAIZEN” is lower than 30%.
However, as shown in the previous page, this “Preparatory work for company-wide KAIZEN”
contains several sub-elements that companies may only achieve in future. Therefore, the low score
at the moment does not mean negative signs. Continued KAIZEN guidance with the follow up by
KU will lead to improve in this element.
57/141
Appendix 10
KAIZEN Guidance Participant Questionnaire (For Understanding KAIZEN)
1. Results of an entry point survey (Before KAIZEN)
Responses to the questionnaire were collected from 57 participants in 13 pilot project companies
during the first seminar before initiating KAIZEN guidance.
2. Results of an end point survey (After KAIZEN)
Responses to the questionnaire were collected from 65 participants in 13 pilot project companies after
completion of KAIZEN guidance. For the end point survey, the questionnaires were also distributed to
QCC leaders, who did not attend the first seminar, so that the number of participants was larger than
the one at the entry point survey.
58/141
Appendix 10
59/141
Appendix 10
3. KAIZEN Guidance Participant Questionnaire Analysis
Based on the survey result from 3-1and 3-2, the end results are analysed to gauge differences between
Before KAIZEN and After KAIZEN.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
TQ‐01 TQ‐02 TQ‐03 TQ‐04 TQ‐05 TQ‐06 TQ‐07 TQ‐08 TQ‐09 TQ‐10 TQ‐11 TQ‐12 TQ‐13
After KAIZEN Sarted
Befor KAIZEN started
60/141
E
arly
Win
s R
epor
t of
Pilo
t Pro
ject
Fir
st G
roup
No.
N
ame
of C
ompa
ny
Issu
es f
or I
mpr
ovem
ent
‘Ear
ly W
ins’
dur
ing
proj
ect
impl
emen
tati
on p
erio
d B
efor
e K
AIZ
EN
A
fter
KA
IZE
N
1 08
1012
500
091
4
Pile
s of
non
-cor
e as
sets
wer
e st
ocke
d in
an
ywhe
re in
the
com
pany
T
he n
eces
sary
and
unn
eces
sary
ass
ets
are
sort
ed o
ut o
r so
ld,
and
thos
e fi
t fo
r re
-use
re
cycl
es a
s in
put f
or p
roce
ssin
g w
ork
The
co
mpa
ny
reco
vere
d ad
diti
onal
re
venu
e w
ith
an a
mou
nt o
f B
irr
118,
995
.
2 08
1014
300
081
4
Usa
ble
raw
mat
eria
ls w
ere
disp
osed
of
with
scr
aps
Uti
lisab
le i
nput
s ar
e id
enti
fied
and
re-
used
ag
ain
and
thos
e un
wan
ted
are
sold
out
T
he
com
pany
re
cove
red
addi
tion
al
reve
nue
wit
h an
am
ount
of
Bir
r 25
, 500
. W
asta
ge
of
tim
e fo
r se
arch
ing
of
man
ufac
turi
ng
tool
s w
hich
w
ere
jum
bled
toge
ther
The
dis
orde
rly
stoc
ked
tool
s w
ere
set
in
orde
r su
itabl
y T
he c
ompa
ny r
educ
ed t
he t
ime
loss
for
se
arch
ing
redu
ced
by 5
0%
3 08
1011
3003
014
The
re
wer
e bi
g do
wn
tim
e in
th
e pr
oduc
tion
line
T
he
prod
ucti
on
proc
ess
is
mad
e to
be
un
inte
rrup
ted
The
com
pany
wou
ld b
e ab
le t
o re
cove
r ad
diti
onal
rev
enue
with
est
imat
ed a
mou
nt
of
Bir
r 1.
1 m
illi
on p
er a
nnum
The
m
echa
nica
l w
ork
shop
w
as
in
a m
essy
con
diti
on.
Too
ls w
ere
plac
ed i
n a
diso
rgan
ised
m
anne
r re
sult
ing
was
ting
of
tim
e.
Was
te
of
sear
chin
g ti
me
for
tool
s is
re
duce
d a
s a
resu
lt of
the
too
ls a
rran
ged
orde
rly
Tim
e fo
r br
ingi
ng
and
sear
chin
g is
re
duce
d by
76%
, in
mon
etar
y te
rm o
f 6.
74
cent
s pe
r la
bour
hou
r is
sav
ed.
4 08
1012
200
201
4
Was
tes
of o
verp
rodu
ctio
n, i
nven
tory
(3
hrs
loss
/day
), m
otio
n an
d m
ovem
ent
(4
days
los
s/da
y),
wai
ting
(5
hrs
loss
/day
) an
d de
fect
mak
ing
wer
e pr
eval
ent
All
thes
e w
aste
s ar
e id
enti
fied
, m
inim
ised
an
d m
anag
ed
Red
uced
W
aste
s of
ov
erpr
oduc
tion
by
50
%,
mot
ion
and
mov
emen
t by
10
0%,
was
te o
f in
vent
ory
by 7
5%, d
efec
t m
akin
g by
50%
and
wai
ting
tim
e by
100
%.
5 08
1011
0001
614
The
re
was
fr
eque
nt
stac
king
pr
oble
m,
taki
ng 5
hrs
/day
for
mai
nten
ance
of
the
chai
n co
nvey
or f
or w
heat
con
veya
nce
to
the
rolle
r m
ill,
resu
lting
in
over
flow
of
whe
at t
o th
e gr
ound
whi
ch i
n tu
rn n
eeds
la
bour
cos
t to
rel
oad
this
whe
at t
o th
e co
nvey
or.
The
re w
as l
oss
of w
heat
flo
ur f
rom
poo
r pa
ckag
es.
Dai
ly c
heck
-up
and
prog
ram
med
cle
anin
g of
th
e co
nvey
or
and
its
room
ar
e ex
erci
sed.
R
e-us
ing
of
impo
rted
w
heat
pa
ckag
es,
afte
r w
ashi
ng, f
or f
lour
pac
kagi
ng.
The
com
pany
rec
over
ed 1
90 q
tl of
whe
at
flou
r (o
r B
irr
12,
730)
lo
st
duri
ng
mai
nten
ance
tim
e be
side
s it
wou
ld r
egai
n B
irr
2448
per
yea
r in
curr
ed f
or r
eloa
ding
by
labo
ur.
T
he c
ompa
ny r
educ
ed c
ost
for
purc
hasi
ng
new
pac
kage
s by
56%
as
wel
l as
the
fl
our
loss
res
ulti
ng i
n es
tim
ated
ov
eral
l ad
diti
onal
in
com
e of
B
irr
78,
000
per
annu
m
Appendix 11
61/141
6 08
1011
0001
114
Was
tage
of
ti
me,
6
hrs/
day,
in
th
e ne
utra
lisat
ion
proc
ess
due
to
the
attit
udes
tha
t the
ava
ilabl
e oi
l tan
kers
are
ad
equa
te
for
this
pr
oces
s,
w
as
resu
ltin
g 20
00lt
of o
il pe
r hr
rem
aine
d w
ithou
t pro
duct
ion.
To
redu
ce t
he t
ime
was
tage
, ins
talla
tion
of
addi
tion
al o
il ta
nk a
nd a
ligni
ng i
t vi
a pi
pe
to o
ther
tank
s is
mad
e.
The
com
pany
abl
e to
pro
duce
add
itio
nal
2000
lt/hr
for
6hr
s/da
y, w
hich
acc
ount
ed
for
Bir
r 20
4,00
0.
7 08
1011
0001
414
The
by
-pro
duct
of
ch
eese
(F
or
maj
o)
proc
essi
ng,
i.e.
, w
hey
was
dis
pose
d of
as
unu
sabl
e.
The
whe
y is
sto
red
in a
ref
rige
rato
r fo
r a
mon
th a
nd c
hurn
ed to
obt
ain
tabl
e bu
tter
. T
he c
ompa
ny o
btai
ned
95 k
g of
but
ter
and
5500
lt of
whe
y an
d so
ld a
t a
rate
of
Bir
r 8,
250/
mon
th.
Milk
was
dis
pose
d of
aft
er l
abor
ator
y ex
amin
atio
n an
d du
e to
torn
pac
kage
s.T
he
mil
k th
at
was
di
spos
ed
of
by
the
com
pany
are
rec
ycle
d.
The
com
pany
rec
over
ed B
irr
846
per
day
as c
ost s
avin
g of
add
ition
al in
com
e.
8 08
1011
3002
904
Tape
m
eter
us
eful
fo
r pr
oduc
t qu
ality
ch
eck
up w
as p
lace
d on
ly a
t su
perv
isor
ha
nd.
Tape
met
ers
are
mad
e to
be
avai
labl
e on
ea
ch c
arts
use
d in
pro
duct
ion
line.
T
he c
ompa
ny r
educ
ed a
tim
e w
asta
ge o
f 62
4 m
inut
es p
er m
onth
by
half
Was
tage
of
tim
e in
sea
rchi
ng t
ools
for
m
aint
enan
ce p
urpo
ses
The
tool
s ar
e ar
rang
ed p
rope
rly
in a
she
lfT
he c
ompa
ny r
educ
ed a
tim
e w
asta
ge o
f 78
0 m
inut
es p
er m
onth
by
half
9 08
1012
400
041
4
The
in
vent
ory
was
to
o di
sorg
anis
ed
resu
ltin
g w
asta
ge
of
tim
e (1
5-20
m
inut
es/d
ay)
in s
earc
hing
nee
ded
item
s
The
inv
ento
ry i
tem
s ar
e ar
rang
ed o
rder
ly
resu
ltin
g in
re
duce
d m
ovem
ent
tim
e of
st
ore
to w
ork
area
The
com
pany
abl
e to
red
uce
was
tage
of
tim
e by
76%
and
rec
over
ed B
irr
900
per
mon
thT
here
wer
e pr
oces
sing
was
tage
s in
the
C
hrom
e/G
alva
nise
d se
ctio
n T
he
was
tage
s ca
uses
an
d ef
fect
s ar
e id
enti
fied
and
red
uced
T
he c
ompa
ny i
ncre
ased
its
pro
duct
ion
of
chai
rs b
y 45
% ,
i.e,
from
25-
30 c
hair
s pe
r da
y to
40
pe
r da
y,
in
mon
etar
y te
rms
addi
tion
al in
com
e of
Bir
r 50
0 pe
r da
y
10
0810
124
000
214
T
here
was
151
ton
s of
rol
led
shee
ts f
or
disp
osal
T
he r
olle
d sh
eets
are
rec
tifi
ed f
or t
heir
de
fect
s an
d us
ed
as
raw
m
ater
ial
for
man
ufac
turi
ng
The
com
pany
reg
aine
d 2.
4 m
illi
on B
irr
Appendix 11
62/141
Ear
ly W
ins
of P
ilot P
roje
ct S
econ
d G
roup
(M
etal
Sec
tor)
No.
N
ame
of
Com
pany
Issu
es f
or I
mpr
ovem
ent
‘Ear
ly W
ins’
dur
ing
proj
ect
impl
emen
tati
on
peri
od
Bef
ore
KA
IZE
N
Aft
er K
AIZ
EN
1.
08
1012
5000
0314
Lea
d tim
e 12
hrs
Sear
ch ti
me
10m
in
Floo
r sp
ace
8 m
2
T
rave
l 15m
To
tal s
teps
4 s
teps
L
abou
r sa
ving
5w
orke
rs
Prod
ucti
vity
20p
iece
s/m
onth
M
ater
ial s
avin
g 20
%
Mac
hine
dow
n tim
e 24
hour
s
Q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t 12
0pie
ces
defe
ct/m
onth
Sa
fety
impr
ovem
ent 2
acc
iden
t/mon
th
L
ead
time
5hrs
Sear
ch ti
me
5min
Fl
oor
spac
e 2m
2
T
rave
l 5m
To
tal s
teps
2 s
teps
L
abou
r sa
ving
2w
orke
rs
Prod
ucti
vity
30p
iece
s/m
onth
M
ater
ial s
avin
g 80
%
Mac
hine
dow
n tim
e 8h
ours
Q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t 80
piec
es
defe
ct/m
onth
Sa
fety
impr
ovem
ent 1
acci
dent
/mon
th
The
nec
essa
ry a
nd u
nnec
essa
ry a
sset
are
sor
ted
out
and
sold
tho
se c
apab
le o
nes
re-
used
as
inpu
t fo
r pr
oces
sing
wor
k T
he c
ompa
ny r
ecov
ered
add
itio
nal r
even
ue o
f bi
rr
amou
nted
to 8
00, 0
00E
TB
2.
08
1012
9000
0514
Lea
d tim
e 2w
eeks
Sear
ch ti
me
1hou
r
Fl
oor
spac
e 50
00 m
2
T
rave
l 50
met
er
Tota
l ste
ps 5
5%
Lab
our
savi
ng 4
T
rans
acti
on 1
hr
Prod
ucti
vity
65%
Q
ualit
y 2-
3def
fect
/pro
duct
Sa
fety
3-4
acci
dent
/mon
th
Part
s sa
ving
s 10
00B
irr/
mon
th
Mat
eria
l sav
ing
3000
0Bir
r/m
onth
M
achi
ne d
own
time
5hou
r/w
eeks
L
ead
time
1wee
ks
Sear
ch ti
me
15m
inut
e
Fl
oor
spac
e 30
00 m
2
T
rave
l 1up
to 2
met
er
Tota
l ste
ps 8
5%
Lab
our
savi
ng 2
wor
kers
T
rans
acti
on 2
0min
ute
Prod
ucti
vity
90%
Q
ualit
y 0-
1 de
fect
/pro
duct
Sa
fety
1 a
ccid
ent/m
onth
Pa
rts
savi
ngs
10,0
00B
irr/
mon
th
Mat
eria
l sav
ing
5000
0Bir
r/m
onth
M
achi
ne d
own
time
2hou
r/w
eeks
Fr
om s
crap
man
agem
ent
1000
-500
0ET
B p
er m
onth
sav
ed
Som
e of
inta
ngib
le o
r Q
ualit
ativ
e be
nefi
ts
Incr
ease
d kn
owle
dge
of K
AIZ
EN
Im
prov
ed te
am w
ork
Dec
reas
ed f
atig
ue o
r st
ress
Im
prov
e co
mm
unic
atio
n
Impr
oved
mor
al
Impr
oved
rel
atio
nshi
p w
ith
stak
e ho
lder
s
Incr
ease
d aw
aren
ess
of
safe
ty e
nvir
onm
ent
O
rder
ly a
nd p
leas
ant w
ork
envi
ronm
ent
3.
08
1012
9000
0614
Lea
d tim
e 21
days
Tra
vel 7
9 m
eter
Se
arch
tim
e 10
min
ute
Prod
ucti
vity
1 u
nit/
day
L
ead
time
18da
ys
Tra
vel 4
0 m
eter
Se
arch
tim
e 3
min
ute
Prod
ucti
vity
1.5
uni
t/day
Appendix 12
63/141
(A
gro-
Proc
essi
ng S
ecto
r)
No.
N
ame
of
Com
pany
Issu
es f
or I
mpr
ovem
ent
‘Ear
ly W
ins’
dur
ing
proj
ect
impl
emen
tati
on
peri
od
Bef
ore
KA
IZE
N
Aft
er K
AIZ
EN
1 08
1011
0001
514
The
sp
arep
arts
ro
om
was
in
a
mes
sy
cond
itio
n. U
sabl
e m
achi
nes,
equ
ipm
ents
and
to
ols
wer
e pl
aced
di
sord
erly
re
sulti
ng
to
was
tage
of
tim
e an
d w
orki
ng f
loor
spa
ce.
Nec
essa
ry
and
unne
cess
ary
asse
ts
are
sort
ed o
ut a
nd th
ose
usab
le i
tem
s ar
e se
t in
or
der
and
re-u
sed
as
inpu
ts
for
othe
r pr
oces
ses.
The
com
pany
red
uced
sea
rchi
ng t
ime
for
a to
ol b
y 50
% f
rom
20m
in t
o 10
min
and
red
uced
occ
upie
d fl
oor
spac
e by
60%
fro
m 3
75m
2 to 1
50m
2. .
Abo
ut
eigh
t ty
pes
of
usab
le
mac
hine
s an
d eq
uipm
ents
wor
th o
f 3,
246,
000
Bir
r ar
e id
enti
fied
, re
pair
ed a
nd r
euse
d.
2 08
1011
0001
304
Shel
fs,
tabl
es
and
othe
r ite
ms
wer
e no
t cl
ean
or
shin
y an
d w
ere
plac
ed
in
a di
sorg
anis
ed m
anne
r re
sult
ing
to w
asta
ge o
f se
arch
ing
time,
m
ovem
ent,
was
tage
of
m
ater
ials
and
spa
ce.
The
re w
ere
dow
n tim
e in
the
prod
ucti
on l
ine
due
to d
efec
ted
prou
dcts
(bu
scui
ts)
in
the
pa
ckin
g m
achi
nes.
Usa
ble
mat
eria
ls
and
equi
pmen
ts
are
iden
tifi
ed, p
lace
d in
ord
er a
nd p
aint
ed w
ith
whi
te c
olor
and
tho
se u
nwan
ted
are
sold
ou
t.
Mat
eria
l w
aste
s ar
e id
enti
fied
and
pro
perl
y m
anag
ed.
The
pr
oduc
tion
pr
oces
s is
m
ade
to
be
cont
inou
se.
The
co
mpa
ny
gain
ed
reve
nue
amou
nted
B
irr
4000
Br.
from
sel
ling
unne
cess
ary
item
s, a
nd a
bout
48
00B
r pe
r m
onth
by
redu
cing
mat
eria
l and
lob
our
loss
es (
by d
ecre
asin
g re
wor
ks).
A
nd a
bout
120
0 B
r. pe
r m
onth
is
reco
vere
d by
re
duci
ng d
ownt
ime.
T
he c
ompa
ny r
educ
ed m
ovem
ent
or s
teps
by
50%
fr
om 2
0 to
10
step
s.
3 08
1011
0001
214
Ear
ly w
ins
repo
rt i
s no
t su
bmit
ted
by th
e co
mpa
ny.
As
the
com
pany
KA
IZE
N c
ore
team
mem
bers
sai
d th
e co
mpa
ny
is
in
its
tran
siti
on
peri
od
from
go
vern
men
tal
to
priv
atel
y ow
ned
and
so
inco
nven
ient
sit
uatio
n to
con
tinue
with
KA
IZE
N
acti
viti
es.
Appendix 12
64/141
(Tex
tile
Sect
or)
No
Com
pany
Nam
eIs
sues
of
Impr
ovem
ent
“Ear
ly
win
s”
duri
ng
proj
ect
impl
emen
tati
on p
erio
d B
efor
e K
AIZ
EN
Aft
er K
AIZ
EN
1 08
1011
3003
114
✓T
he l
ead
time
to d
eliv
er r
aw m
ater
ial
from
the
st
ore
to th
e pr
oduc
tion
are
a w
as 4
5 m
inut
es.
✓It
ems
wer
e pl
aced
in
a di
sorg
anis
ed m
anne
r in
th
e R
M s
tore
and
it
was
tak
ing
18 m
inut
es t
o fi
nd
out a
sin
gle
item
. ✓
The
re
was
51
55
defe
cts/
6 m
onth
s in
cu
ttin
g se
ctio
n.
✓80
% o
f th
e pr
oduc
tion
are
a w
as o
ccup
ied
by
unne
cess
ary
item
s.
✓B
y ap
plyi
ng 5
S ac
tivi
ties
in th
e R
M s
tore
, the
lea
d ti
me
has
shor
tene
d to
15
min
utes
. ✓
The
sea
rchi
ng t
ime
of t
ools
is
redu
ced
by 6
1%
whi
ch is
7 m
inut
es.
✓D
efec
t m
akin
g is
red
ucin
g by
74%
whi
ch i
s 13
54
defe
cts/
6 m
onth
s.
✓B
y ap
plyi
ng 5
S ac
tivi
ties
, th
ey s
aved
65%
of
the
floo
r w
hich
was
pre
viou
sly
occu
pied
by
unne
cess
ary
item
s.
2 08
1011
3002
704
✓It
was
tak
ing
25 s
ec i
n or
der
to f
ind
out
a si
ngle
to
ol f
rom
the
tool
sto
re.
✓T
he m
achi
nes
wer
e be
ing
stop
ped
for
20 h
rs p
er
wee
k fo
r m
aint
enan
ce p
urpo
se.
✓T
he f
acto
ry h
ad b
een
prod
ucin
g 28
280.
5/kg
per
a
wee
k.
✓ 3
4.32
m2 o
f th
e st
ore
was
nee
ded
in o
rder
to
keep
con
es a
nd b
obbi
ns.
✓B
y ap
plyi
ng
5S
activ
itie
s in
th
e to
ol
stor
age
sect
ion,
the
y ar
e ab
le t
o re
duce
the
sea
rchi
ng t
ime
to
10 s
ec/t
ool.
✓
The
y ca
n sa
ve 4
pro
duct
ion
hrs
by m
inim
isin
g th
e m
achi
ne d
ownt
ime
to 1
6 hr
s pe
r w
eek.
✓
The
pr
oduc
tivi
ty
has
show
n an
in
crem
ent
of
173.
5kg/
wee
k w
hich
m
eans
th
ey
can
prod
uce
2845
4kg/
wee
k.
✓B
y ap
plyi
ng 5
S, t
hey
are
able
to
keep
the
con
es
and
bobb
ins
only
in 6
m2 in
ord
er a
nd e
asy
way
.
T
he c
ompa
ny c
an s
ave
USD
726
.5
(Bir
r 10
897.
5)
by
redu
cing
th
e m
achi
ne d
ownt
ime
from
20h
rs/w
eek
to 1
6hrs
/wee
k.
3 08
1011
3002
904
✓3
liter
dye
was
bei
ng w
aste
d pe
r ev
ery
shif
t in
fi
nish
ing
sect
ion
beca
use
the
wor
k w
as b
eing
don
e m
anua
lly.
✓To
ols
wer
e pl
aced
in
a di
sord
ered
man
ner
in t
he
wor
ksho
p an
d it
took
3 m
inut
es t
o se
arch
and
fin
d ou
t a s
ingl
e to
ol.
✓In
fin
ishi
ng s
ecti
on,
the
mac
hine
s us
ed t
o be
st
oppe
d fo
r 30
min
utes
in
ever
y 2
hrs.
The
re w
ere
arou
nd
4 st
eps
to
be
done
m
anua
lly
(Mud
a in
Pr
oces
s).
✓6
m2
of t
he s
tore
was
occ
upie
d by
ite
ms
whi
ch
are
plac
ed i
n a
diso
rgan
ised
and
sca
tter
ed m
anne
r so
that
the
room
was
too
smal
l to
wor
k in
.
✓T
he d
ye w
asta
ge is
tot
ally
avo
ided
by
chan
ging
the
wor
ks th
at h
ad b
een
done
man
ually
to a
utom
atic
. ✓
The
sea
rchi
ng t
ime
is r
educ
ed t
o 0.
5 m
inut
e by
ap
plyi
ng 5
S in
the
wor
ksho
p.
✓T
hey
are
able
to r
educ
e th
e m
achi
ne d
ownt
ime
to 4
m
inut
es/e
very
2 h
rs b
y av
oidi
ng M
uda
in p
roce
ss.
The
ste
ps a
re r
educ
ed to
1.
✓B
y ap
plyi
ng 5
S, t
hey
can
keep
the
too
ls i
n 2
m2
floo
r sp
ace
so t
hat
they
can
wor
k in
a p
leas
ant
and
wid
er w
ork
area
.
Appendix 12
65/141
(Che
mic
al S
ecto
r)
No.
N
ame
of C
ompa
nyIs
sues
for
Im
prov
emen
t ‘E
arly
Win
s’ d
urin
g pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
pe
riod
B
efor
e K
AIZ
EN
A
fter
KA
IZE
N
1 08
1012
0001
914
Lea
d tim
e 1.
75 h
r
Se
arch
tim
e 10
min
Fl
oor
spac
e 20
0 m
2
L
abou
r sa
ving
5
Prod
ucti
vity
4 B
atch
/day
M
ater
ial s
avin
g 20
0 E
TB
/mat
eria
l
L
ead
time
1.4
hr
Se
arch
tim
e 1
min
Fl
oor
spac
e 40
0 m
2
L
abou
r sa
ving
4
Prod
ucti
vity
5 B
atch
/day
M
ater
ial s
avin
g 12
0 E
TB
/mat
eria
l
The
tea
m w
ork
spir
it an
d w
ork
mor
al i
mpr
oved
hi
ghly
as
the
intr
oduc
tion
of
KA
IZE
N w
ith
high
le
vel
of c
ontin
ual
impr
ovem
ent
thou
ghts
. Im
prov
ed
plan
t la
y ou
t, ne
w
equi
pmen
ts
to
impr
ove
prod
ucti
on
and
past
e ha
ndlin
g sy
stem
fo
r w
ater
ba
sed
and
synt
heti
c dy
es.
2 08
1012
0001
704
Lea
d tim
e at
the
oil
/fat
mel
ting
area
28
min
L
ead
time
Dis
solu
tion
of
Cau
stic
20
m
in
Mix
er l
ine
1 an
d 2
abou
t 40
kg
of R
M
was
w
aste
d du
e to
im
prop
er
arra
ngem
ent a
nd h
andl
ing.
1.
05
pack
agin
g m
ater
ial
used
pe
r pr
oduc
t
T
hey
used
to
tr
avel
14
0 m
eter
fr
om
Lau
ndry
so
ap
prod
ucti
on
floo
r to
w
orks
hop
to l
ook
for
tool
s an
d di
es a
nd
spen
d ab
out 1
0 m
inut
es
Pack
ing
mat
eria
l st
orag
e ro
om c
arto
ons
wer
e pl
aced
ev
eryw
here
m
akin
g th
e st
orag
e pl
ace
jam
-pac
ked
and
mes
sy
wit
h on
ly 9
m2
free
wor
k sp
ace.
In
lau
ndry
soa
p pr
oduc
tion
mix
er l
ine 1
ha
s 13
m2
free
wor
k sp
ace
mix
er l
ine 2
ha
s 10
m
2 fr
ee
wor
k sp
aces
du
e to
un
nece
ssar
y in
pro
cess
inve
ntor
y.
Lau
ndry
fl
oor
was
di
sorg
anis
ed
with
so
me
scra
ps o
n th
e fl
oors
(34
m2 )
At
the
mix
ing
pit
(96m
2 ) w
orks
hop
(80m
2 )
L
abou
r 6
pers
on a
t m
eltin
g pi
t 2
pers
on
at M
iller
mac
hine
L
ead
time
at t
he o
il/f
at m
eltin
g ar
ea 2
0 m
in
Lea
d tim
e D
isso
luti
on o
f C
aust
ic 5
min
N
o R
M w
asta
ge
1.02
pac
king
mat
eria
l use
d pe
r pr
oduc
t
20
fla
nges
sav
ed
2 V
acuu
m p
umps
sav
ed
1 co
nvey
er s
aved
29
oil
drum
s sa
ved
250
met
er E
lect
ric
Cab
le s
aved
K
eepi
ng t
he t
ools
and
Die
s at
the
nee
ded
plac
e in
lau
ndry
soa
p pr
oduc
tion
mak
ing
tool
box
C
arto
ons
wel
l ar
rang
ed i
n st
anda
rd w
ay
wit
h a
fixe
d pl
ace
for
spec
ific
typ
e of
pa
ckin
g m
ater
ial
let
to g
ain
25 m
2 fre
e sp
aces
.
D
eter
min
ing
the
daily
con
sum
ptio
n of
the
R
M
(dol
omit
e)
that
sh
ould
be
ke
pt
at
poin
t of
us
e.
Free
w
ork
spac
e ga
ined
m
ixer
lin
e 1 4
5 m
2 an
d mix
er l
ine 2
has
22.
5 m
2 .
Sc
raps
el
imin
ated
fr
om
wor
k fl
oor
(60
m2 )
Mix
ing
pit
(120
m2 )
and
Wor
ksho
p (1
10m
2 )
M
akin
g w
heel
bar
row
mel
ting
pit
labo
ur
The
com
pany
QC
C t
eam
des
igne
d a
whe
el b
arro
w
to c
arry
hea
vy o
il d
rum
to
redu
ce f
atig
ue/M
uri
and
incr
ease
pro
duct
ivit
y re
duci
ng m
an p
ower
req
uire
d to
han
dle
the
oper
atio
n cr
eatin
g an
app
ealin
g w
ork
envi
ronm
ent,
and
they
als
o de
sign
a t
ool
box
at t
he
poin
t of
use
so
that
it
redu
ces
tran
spor
tatio
n an
d m
otio
n m
udas
. T
hey
also
int
rodu
ced
oil
refu
ellin
g pu
mps
to
prev
ent
spil
ls a
nd w
aste
of
fuel
s du
ring
m
anua
l re
fuel
ling,
an
d m
ade
a ce
ntra
l co
ntro
l sw
itch
boa
rd f
or d
iffe
rent
mac
hine
’s a
nd P
umps
w
hich
was
in
a sc
atte
red
cond
itio
n be
fore
KA
IZE
N
crea
ting
bad
oper
atin
g co
nditi
on a
nd m
udas
thro
ugh
this
act
ivit
y th
ey s
aved
abo
ut 2
00 m
eter
(4x
4 m
m2)
el
ectr
ic c
able
whi
ch w
orth
’s 1
5,00
0ET
B.
Com
pani
es
wor
ker
prob
lem
id
enti
fica
tion
an
d se
ekin
g ch
ange
co
ntin
uall
y,
to
mak
e th
emse
lves
an
d th
eir
com
pany
bet
ter
thro
ugh
thei
r w
ork.
Appendix 12
66/141
No.
N
ame
of C
ompa
nyIs
sues
for
Im
prov
emen
t ‘E
arly
Win
s’ d
urin
g pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
pe
riod
B
efor
e K
AIZ
EN
A
fter
KA
IZE
N
The
sa
fety
le
vel
was
lo
wer
w
ith
prob
lem
s re
late
d to
po
or
wor
k en
viro
nmen
t 40%
redu
ced
to
5 an
d w
ith
othe
r K
AIZ
EN
acti
viti
es m
iller
mac
hine
1 p
erso
n.
Thr
ough
w
ell
orga
nise
d w
ork
envi
ronm
ent
safe
ty i
ncre
ased
by
5% &
re
ache
d 45
%
3 08
1012
0002
214
Lea
d tim
e
M
ater
ial
savi
ngs
defe
ct
rate
s 5%
in
pl
astic
uni
t
It
too
k 20
min
ute
to g
ive
an it
em f
or th
e on
e w
ho n
eeds
it fr
om s
tore
It
tak
es 1
0 m
inut
e th
e ri
ght
tool
s in
the
m
aint
enan
ce w
orks
hop.
T
here
is
alm
ost
no f
ree
spac
e in
the
co
smet
ics
prod
ucti
on f
loor
T
here
w
ere
53
labo
urs
wor
king
in
pl
astic
man
ufac
turi
ng u
nit
It u
sed
to ta
ke 4
day
s to
rep
air
mac
hine
s
C
osm
etic
s pr
oduc
tion
flo
or n
o.2
used
to
man
ufac
ture
/pro
duce
7,5
00 K
g pe
r da
y
In
pla
stic
uni
t def
ect r
ate
was
6%
T
here
has
bee
n tw
o m
inor
inj
urie
s pe
r m
onth
L
ead
time
Mat
eria
l sa
ving
def
ect
rate
was
red
uced
2%
R
educ
ed t
o 15
min
ute
by s
etti
ng i
n or
der
by s
ettin
g m
ater
ial i
n or
der.
The
sea
rch
time
redu
ced
to 5
min
ute
afte
r im
plem
enta
tion
of
5S a
ctiv
ities
.
T
hrou
gh
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
5S
ac
tivi
ties
60
m2 w
ork
spac
e ac
quir
ed
Now
the
num
ber
of la
bour
red
uced
to 4
4
N
ow
the
mai
nten
ance
/rep
air
time
for
sam
e m
achi
ne r
educ
ed to
1.1
/2 d
ays
Now
the
cos
met
ics
prod
ucti
on f
loor
no.
2 in
crea
sed
its
prod
ucti
on to
10,
000
Kg
Plas
tic
unit
Def
ect r
ate
redu
ced
to 4
%
No
inju
ries
re
cord
ed
sinc
e K
AIZ
EN
in
trod
uced
Not
ice
boar
ds a
re f
illed
with
inf
orm
atio
n th
at k
eep
empl
oyee
wel
l in
form
ed a
bout
thei
r w
ork
and
basi
c K
AIZ
EN
kn
owle
dge
that
in
crea
ses/
buil
d th
eir
capa
city
, vi
sual
m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
es
tabl
ishe
d w
ell,
wor
k en
viro
nmen
t st
anda
rdis
ed
wel
l an
d or
gani
sed
and
cond
uciv
e to
inc
reas
e qu
ality
and
pr
oduc
tivi
ty.
Rem
arka
ble
achi
evem
ents
w
ere
gain
ed
draw
ing
the
pote
ntia
l of
em
ploy
ees
to
sust
ain
and
ensu
re c
ontin
ual
impr
ovem
ent
thro
ugh
full
par
tici
patio
n.
Appendix 12
67/141
(Lea
ther
Sec
tor)
No.
N
ame
of
Com
pany
Issu
es f
or I
mpr
ovem
ent
‘Ear
ly W
ins’
dur
ing
proj
ect
impl
emen
tati
on
peri
od
Bef
ore
KA
IZE
N
Aft
er K
AIZ
EN
1 08
1011
5002
614
Sear
ch ti
me
was
10
min
100
pcs
defe
ct p
er p
roce
ss
Se
arch
tim
e re
duce
d to
5 m
in
75
pcs
def
ect p
er p
roce
ss
Impr
oved
thei
r w
ork
envi
ronm
ent w
ell a
nd
crea
ted
appe
alin
g w
ork
area
thro
ugh
impl
emen
tati
on o
f 5S
and
kee
p on
see
king
co
ntin
ual c
hang
e th
roug
h K
AIZ
EN
.
(S
ourc
e: 2
nd P
hase
PP
com
pani
es r
epor
t A
naly
sed
by K
AIZ
EN
Uni
t M
embe
rs)
Appendix 12
68/141
Appendix 13
Company Name
KAIZEN progress level What is afraid to obstruct
improvement Evaluation
Metal
0810129000514
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S. They trained all employees before starting KAIZEN activities. They established the standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order” They understood the purpose and making process of Standard Operation Sheets and studied effective layout utilising Standard Operation Sheets. They understood QCC activities and started concrete activities.
None.
5
081012900 614
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S. They need more effort, because some of the necessary standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order” were not established yet. They understood the purpose and making process of Standard Operation Sheets and utilising it to make effective layout. They understood QCC activities and started concrete activities.
The plant manager, who understood KAIZEN activities deeply retired. KAIZEN activity is operated continuously because some of KAIZEN core team members were 4-day seminar participants. Future development after new plant manager’s arrival should be monitored.
4
0810125000314
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S. They were able to keep 5S activities results, but need to establish the standard for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They haven’t utilised Standard Operation Sheets. We guided them on purpose & preparation process to revise their Standard Operation Sheets. They started concrete QCC activities, and we guided them to make Standard Operation Sheets to show the points of KAIZEN accurately.
The managers did not understand fully the importance of hearing from employees who were working to improve work environment through 5S activities. They should urge to employees to participate to the activities voluntary.
3
0810125000914
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S and maintained good work environment. They established the standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”, but they need some more effort. They have not utilised Standard Operations Sheets. We must guide to proceed work control utilising Standard Operation Sheets. They have not developed concrete QCC activity.
Because one employee of KAIZEN core team member retired, its influence on KAIZEN activity development needs to be monitored. 4
0810143000814
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S. They understood 5S results (good work environment) make work easy. They also understood importance of hearing employee opinions. There is a part which is not maintained 5S
KAIZEN core team understood the importance to keep work environment that makes work easy, but they prioritised requirements of increase in production than
3
KAIZEN Guidance Company Assessment Report Evaluation of Capability as Future Model (Metal)
69/141
Appendix 13
5: High Probability to be Model Company 4: Possibility Model Company 3: Required Big Effort
2: Required Great Effort 1: Difficult
activity results. They understood the purpose of Standard Operation Sheets, but it is not clear how to make them. Guidance of how to make them was needed, but promoting and maintaining 5S activities required more urgent guidance attention. They performed QCC activity at the model process, but the activities have not been continuing, because the management put priority on production volume.
keeping work environment in order. They need more definite determination by management to keep work environment in good order.
0810124001004
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S, and had intention to expand into office areas. But in response to the market's product shortage, management put priority on production volume without regard to quality improvement. KAIZEN activity results turned worse than the condition before starting it. They have not reviewed Standard Operation Sheets.
There is no need of KAIZEN unless management mind-set changes to quality –conscious mind-set. Under management’s non-quality-conscious policy, KAIZEN core team leader is not expected to make meaningful effort in KAIZEN.
2
0810124000414
They understood the purpose and execution process of 5S. Employees enjoy change in work environment. Further guidance was planned considering their efficient equipment layout, after training making Standard Operation Sheets, and then following the activities with the assistance. After management’s transfer of many workers out of the model workplaces, the KAIZEN activities were stalling.
Management transferred workers out of their model workplaces to other areas to increase production, leaving the model workplaces short staffed. Management doesn't feel the importance of continuing KAIZEN activities. KAIZEN core team makes effort to keep the activity but no support from management. If this condition continues, employee's discontent is to pile up and activities may stop, in which case resumption of KAIZEN in future is extremely difficult.
1
0810124000214
KAIZEN activities stopped after certain progress was made in understanding 5S’s purpose and process, but Standard Operation Sheets have not been made. This was caused by company’s operation ordered to be suspended in relation to imported products quality issue. No further KAIZEN activities expected currently.
Their operation is stopped by governmental demand. They don’t have time for KAIZEN activities to make countermeasure restarting operation.
2
70/141
Appendix 13
Company Name
KAIZEN progress level What is afraid to obstruct
improvement Evaluation
Textile
0810113002704
The company has very sophisticated factory established 4 years ago. They have good relations with the employees. They understood the purpose of 5S. They trained all employees before starting KAIZEN activities. They established the standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups, and demonstrated QCC meeting in front of the guidance team. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale.
They may need wider KAIZEN experience through dissemination process.
5
0810113003014
The company is very old and the factory is dusty. They understood the purpose of 5S. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and trained them. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale, but their KAIZEN experience is limited in maintenance area only.
They have some technical problems in their operation processes because all the machines are very old, and spare parts are not readily available. They should improve techniques in key processes such as oiling process, carding process and drawing process in order to defend and develop their business.
4
0810113002904
The company is very old They understood the purpose of 5S. They trained all QCC members before starting QCC activities. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC meeting in front of the guidance team. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale.
All the 4 attendants of the 4-day seminar left from the factory. GM was also changed. But new GM and newly organised KAIZEN core team members recovered very fast almost from scratch by studying by themselves. Their situation deserves follow-up monitoring.
3
0810113003114
The company is garment industry with typical labour-intensive processes. They understood the purpose of 5S. They established the standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC meeting in front of the guidance team. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale.
The company started to introduce ISO QMS recently. Consequently, major players of KAIZEN activities were re-assigned to ISO activities. Top management appears to have lost enthusiasm in KAIZEN.
2
KAIZEN Guidance Company Assessment Report Evaluation of Capability as Future Model (Textile & Agro Processing)
71/141
Appendix 13
0810113002814
The company has long history. Because of their financial problem, no progress was made in the KAIZEN guidance. Even the plant tour was refused. They did not undertake any concrete KAIZEN activities even when homework assignments were suggested. The guidance team could not even determine if the company was operating the factory.
The company had a serious financial problem. Due to the problem, GM never appeared at the meeting with the guidance team.
1
Agro-P
rocessing
0810110001614
Established 5 years ago, the company is new in this industry. Top management is very active to introduce KAIZEN. They understood the purpose of 5S and trained all QCC members. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC meeting and QCC presentation for the shooting for project’s audio visual material. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale.
The company strongly supported the project’s audio visual material production with QCC activities.
5
0810110001114
The company is old but the management is active. They understood the purpose of 5S and trained QCC members. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC presentation in front of the guidance team. They became ready to disseminate activities in company-wide scale.
They cooperated for the project’s audio-visual production activities. They sometimes go back to old management style.
4
0810110001414
Their product requires keeping freshness and cleanliness. Therefore they mind workplace hygiene very much. They understood the purpose of 5S. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC presentation in front of the guidance team. But there was some miscommunication between management and QCC leaders that made activities less active. At the last meeting of guidance, however, 5 members of KAIZEN core team attended and showed strong support to KAIZEN activities. They became ready to disseminate activities to the company-wide.
A special meeting with the GM to report the weakening situation of KAIZEN activities prompted the GM to take action to activate KAIZEN activities. It was before our last visit. We believe their activities are restarted and going to better condition.
3
0810110001514
The company is part of big business group. They understood the purpose of 5S and trained QCC members on KAIZEN activities. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made
After strong progress of KAIZEN activities at the beginning, their business faced a problem. Factory operation stopped about 1
2
72/141
Appendix 13
5: High Probability to be Model Company 4: Possibility Model Company 3: Required Big Effort
2: Required Great Effort 1: Difficult
process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and demonstrated QCC meeting in front of the guidance team.
month due to lack of order from customer. Raw material storage is empty, and products storage is full. We wonder, with the production / sales planning failure, if they can move to next step.
0810110001304
The company is rather old but the management was very strong to support KAIZEN activities. They performed the factory washing and shining up activity with all the management and employees including factory workers and office workers. They understood the purpose of 5S. They trained all employees before starting KAIZEN activities. They established standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order”. They made process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and showing good progress.
Despite their very good initial performance on KAIZEN activities, the copany stopped factory operation abruptly for almost 1 month. They suffered operating cash flow shortage in the recent 6 months, stopped direct import of shortening, and finally stopped operation. The company subsequently found a partner and resumption of operation was being planned.
2
0810110001214
The company is old and recently privatised around June 2010. They understood the purpose of 5S. They executed preparation of standards for “Sort” and “Set in Order” and process flowchart, layout drawing and Standard Operation Sheets. They established QCC groups and just started training of QCC members.
The process of privatization was still on-going with their organisation in confusion. They reassigned KAIZEN core team chairman because of management priority in dealing with the privatisation process.
1
73/141
Appendix 13
Company Name
KAIZEN progress level What is afraid to obstruct
improvement Evaluation
Chem
ical
0810120001914
They understood KAIZEN concept, and made Standard Operation Sheets and started activities for improvement (elimination of Muda). They undertook employee training with textbook in Amharic version. They started QCC activities. GM thinks KAIZEN’s productivity improvement is significant enough to stop new investment. They are ready to disseminate KAIZEN activities to entire the company, and the front-line workers of many workplaces other than the model workplaces started 5S activities voluntary.
Nothing special.
5
0810120002214
They understood KAIZEN concept, and company management (Core Team) made KAIZEN action plans, designated responsible personnel, implemented them including facility remodeling. They established QCC organisation, and undertaking QCC activities with selecting themes. They conducted employee training to front-line employees. Employee attitude is positive towards improving productivity and workload appreciate to KAIZEN activities. KAIZEN core team made KAIZEN dissemination plan in company-wide and they were implementing KAIZEN activities in turn. And already three workplaces outside of the model workplaces started 5S and further expansion is planned.
Nothing special
5
0810120001704
They understand KAIZEN concept, and get proactively involved in KAIZEN activities. They undertaking employee training in Amharic. They made Standard Operation Sheets, and took up workload reduction theme for front-line workers. They established QCC activities and regular meeting was set. They established 4 KAIZEN action plans, and assigned designated responsible personnel. They are ready got implementation under way.
Nothing special
5
0810117001804
QCC leader of model workplace has confidence to proceed KAIZEN activities. KAIZEN Core team members don’t have interest much about KAIZEN, KAIZEN core team members’ attendance became extremely poor at the guidance meetings. Company-wide dissemination is expected to be challenged.
The KAIZEN core team have very less attentions to KAIZEN activities.
3
0810122002114 KAIZEN core team members did not understand KAIZEN’s basic concepts such
Lack of experience.
3
KAIZEN Guidance Company Assessment Report Evaluation of Capability as Future Model (Chemical)
74/141
Appendix 13
5: High Probability to be Model Company 4: Possibility Model Company 3: Required Big Effort
2: Required Great Effort 1: Difficult
as 5S and standardisation. 5S implementation at model workplaces was not good. KAIZEN secretary has an eagerness to implement KAIZEN activities, they might be improved their performance if KAIZEN training will be continued.
0810122002014
They implemented 5S activities at model workplace. But 5S activities is suspended. They understood little the basic standardisation concept. They trained KAIZEN to all employees but didn’t assign the activities. They explained company-wide expansion of 5S but didn’t execute at all.
KAIZEN core team understood the KAIZEN knowledge, but they recognised the lack of power to disseminate KAIZEN activities and lack of practicing ability for KAIZEN activities.
2
75/141
Appendix 13
5: High Probability to be Model Company 4: Possibility Model Company 3: Required Big Effort 2:
Required Great Effort 1: Difficult
Company Name
KAIZEN progress level What is afraid to obstruct
improvement Evaluation
Leather
0810115002614
The owner is positive towards KAIZEN. 5S activities got started but some workplaces 5S activities returned to previous situation. They made Standard Operation Sheets and then exercised elimination of MUDA. right after guidance period ended. They established QCC organisation, and they continue KAIZEN activities through QCC members. They set up dissemination plan.
Lack of understanding concept of standardisation.
3
0810115002314
They understand KAIZEN concept, and workers in model workplace have changed to positive for the activities. They worked to make Standard Operation Sheets and Standard Operation Distribution Sheet, but have not been utilised enough.
Lack of experience.
3
0810115002514
They have 2 Quality and Productivity Improvement activities, KAIZEN and Benchmarking. They have accepted Benchmarking help from the organisation and stopped KAIZEN activity.
Managerial difficulties to simultaneously coordinate KAIZEN and benchmarking activities by same of those managerial staff
1
KAIZEN Guidance Company Assessment Report Evaluation of Capability as Future Model (Leather)
76/141
Appendix 14
Basic Indicators for Management of Production
Survey on the management status of basic management indicators was conducted on 20 out of
total 28 companies of pilot project participants. Responses were received from 7 companies
(response rate 35%).
1) Responses to questionnaires
(1)Quality (3)Delivery (4)Safty (6)Morale Total Average
Q1.
Def
ect R
ate
or Y
ield
C1.
Pro
duct
Cos
t(p
er u
nit p
rodu
ct)
C2.
Gro
ss P
rofi
t by
prod
uct
Ave
rage
D1.
Del
iver
y sc
hedu
le n
on-a
dher
enc
coun
t
S1.
Lab
our
inju
ry c
ount
P1.
Mac
hine
Util
isat
ion
Rat
e
P2.
Pro
duct
ion
Cap
acity
P3.
In-p
roce
ss I
nven
tory
Ave
rage
M1.
Abs
ente
e R
atio
Tot
al A
vera
ge
1-01 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1.4
1-02 2 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2.5
Average 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.0
2-01 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 1 1.9
Average 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.3 1.0 1.9
3-01 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1.2
3-02 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1.2
3-03 6 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 2.2
Average 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.3 2.3 1.7 1.0 1.6
4-01 7 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2 1.9
Average 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.9
(2)Cost (5)Productivity
No. Company's Name
2) Histogram of responses by indicators
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 2 3
(6)Morale Indicators
Don't maintain Limited Workplaces Maintain for All 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 2 3
(5)Productivity Indicator
Don't maintain Limited Processes Maintain for All
77/141
Appendix 14 3) Analysis and evaluation
Responses from seven companies were analysed as follows.
Results Analysis & Consideration (1) Quality Maintain for all (43%) Limited
Products (29%) Don’t maintain (29%).
Although almost half of respondents maintain quality data for all, overall level of data management in relation to quality is not high.
(2) Cost Maintain for All (71%) Limited Products (7%).
Almost 80% maintain cost data in some extent. The level of data management in terms of cost management is relatively good.
(3) Delivery Don’t maintain (29%) Without associated info (71%) Maintain for All (0%)
The level of data management in terms of delivery data is significantly low.
(4) Safety Don’t maintain (14%)Without associated info (29%) Maintain for all (57%)
The level of safety data management is relatively high. Safety management for employees is one of core requirements to maintain good workplace condition. However, 14% replies “Don’t maintain” in addition to other 29% of “without associated info”. This suggests that managements’ safety awareness is still low in some companies.
(5) Productivity Don’t maintain (33%)Limited Processes (33%) Maintain for All (33%)
The degree of data management for productivity data is not high. The background is unavailability of consecutive measurement of productivity, as well as lack of appropriate indicator to measure the productivity.
(6) Morale Don’t maintain (0%)Limited Workplaces (43%) Maintain for All (57%)
The level of data management for morale (attendance) data is relatively good. This is because employee’s wages are paid according to the number of working days.
Comprehensive evaluation
The number of companies responded to the survey on basic management indicators is only 7 companies (25%). These include companies where KAIZEN activities are well implemented. However, the level of data management for basic management indicators is still poor even at these companies having good KAIZEN practice. From the fact that many companies does not participate this survey, if the average level of data management for basic management indicators is calculated across all the pilot project companies, it would be significantly low. Among indicators, the morale (attendance) data which is the basis for wage calculation as well as the cost data which directly related to the revenue are well managed. For other indicators to be utilised for improving management capability of companies, such as the delivery data or the productivity data, the level of data management is yet need to be improved.
78/141
Appendix 15
Morale Survey with Pilot Companies
Morale survey was conducted with both employees and managers of the pilot project companies.
Based on the outcome, each group’s morale was analysed for evaluation.
1 Morale survey to employees
1) Responses to questionnaires
(1)5S(6)Sense ofbelonging
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q114 Q15 Q16
1-01 4 2 4 4 3 4 2 2 4 1 2 3 2 3 4 41-02 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 31-03 5 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
2-01 5 2 4 2 2 4 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 2 22-02 4 2 3 3 2 4 2 5 3 3 3 1 2 3 2 22-03 5 2 5 3 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 2 3 52-04 5 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 52-05 2 NA 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 52-06 4 5 4 4 3 2 2 4 1 4 1 4 4 3 2 52-07 5 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 5 4 42-08 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 42-09 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 1 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 42-10 5 2 5 4 2 2 4 4 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 52-11 5 4 2 2 3 2 5 3 1 3 3 1 2 3 2 42-12 5 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 42-13 5 5 5 1 5 2 4 4 2 5 4 5 4 NA NA NA
3-01 3 5 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 2 3 3 2 3 5 2
4-01 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 5 4 5 5 54-02 5 2 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 4 54-03 4 NA 4 4 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 54-04 5 4 4 4 2 3 2 1 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5
5-01 5 3 2 3 3 5 1 1 2 4 1 4 2 5 4 55-02 5 2 4 4 5 4 1 3 2 2 4 3 4 3 3 15-03 5 3 4 4 4 5 2 4 5 2 3 4 4 5 5 45-04 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4
6-01 4 2 2 3 3 3 3 NA 4 4 4 1 3 2 3 26-02 5 2 3 2 5 3 4 4 3 1 3 4 3 4 3 46-03 5 2 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 1 3 4 3 4 3 4
7-01 5 4 4 4 3 4 2 2 3 4 2 3 3 3 4 37-02 3 4 5 3 4 5 4 4 1 1 5 5 1 5 5 57-03 5 2 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 4
8-01 3 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 4 4 48-02 4 4 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 3 28-03 4 2 4 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 5 3 38-04 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 59-01 5 2 1 2 3 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 5 5 29-02 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 49-03 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 49-04 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4
10-01 5 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 110-02 4 2 3 1 2 5 1 1 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 310-03 4 2 4 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 4 2 210-04 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 211-01 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 511-02 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 2 211-03 5 NA 4 4 3 5 1 1 3 2 3 4 3 4 4 512-01 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 3 412-02 2 4 4 4 1 4 1 1 NA 5 4 5 1 3 NA 412-03 4 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 3 2 112-04 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 5 2 2
13-01 5 4 5 4 5 5 3 3 3 4 5 4 5 5 5 413-02 4 5 5 4 5 5 3 3 3 4 3 4 5 4 5 4
14-01 4 5 4 3 2 5 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 414-02 5 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 4 3 4 514-03 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4
15-01 5 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 1 1 3 3 2 5 4 115-02 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 1 4 3 4 5 5 5
16-01 5 4 4 4 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 5 2 5 5 516-02 5 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 2 3 4 1 3 4 216-03 5 4 3 4 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 4 3 1 4 516-04 5 4 3 4 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 5 1 2 4 5
11
2
(3)Training
15
13
14
8
16
9
10
(2)Human Relations
12
(5)Objectives Management
4
5
6
7
Company Name(4)Wagees Evaluation
1
79/141
Appendix 15
2) Histogram of responses by elements
Morale Survey for Employee Histgram Feb/'11All sector
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(6)Sense of
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(4)Wagees Evaluation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(3)Training
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(2)Human Relations
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1 2 3 4 5
(1)5S
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(5)Objectives Management Belonging
Note 1:Not Reality 2:Maybe to some extent 3: More or Less reasonably4: Good 5: Excellent
3) Radar charts by sector
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
(1)5S
(2)Human Relations
(3)Training
(4)Wagees Evaluation
(5)Objectives Management
(6)Sense ofbelonging
Metal
Agro
Textile
Chemical
Remarks: No much difference is seen among different sectors at employee level.
80/141
Appendix 15
4) Analysis and evaluation
Morale survey was conducted with 61 employees from 16 pilot project companies. Based on
the outcome, employee’s morale in terms of 5S, Human Resources and Organisation was
analysed for evaluation.
Questions Results Analysis & Consideration (1) 5S Very good (56%)
Good in model workplace (31%)
Among all employees, 87% of them positively evaluate their degree of 5S practical implementation.
(2) Human Relations
Good (39%) not good (27%)
Employees’ opinion varies among companies. It indicates some companies prepared good working environment based on mutual trust with employees but others does not.
(3) Training Not really (31%)Good (31%) Somewhat OK (12%) Reasonable (22%)
Training is not sufficiently conducted for employees at most of companies. Companies should focus on employee training in future.
(4) Wages Evaluation
More or less reasonable (35%) Not really (19%) Maybe to some extent (20%) Very fairly done (5%) Mostly properly done (21%)
Among all employees, 20% complain about imbalances between workload and wages while 26% expressed their contentment. Overall, employees who are not satisfied occupied major part.
(5) Objectives Management
Well managed (33%)Very well managed (18%) Not at all and to some extent (20%)
Among all employees, 50% are satisfied with the current objectives management, while only half of them express their concern. Therefore, the objectives are well managed.
(6) Sense of Belonging
Work at least for some time (37%) Work for a long time (32%) May leave for another chance (18%)
Most of employees want to work for the company where they’re currently working for. However, some are flexible to change the workplace for better chance.
Comprehensive Evaluation
Most of employees expressed their satisfaction for the KAIZEN activity, especially for 5S introduced by the pilot project. The survey reveals employee’s high degree of sense of belonging to their companies. However, considering the current labor market in Ethiopia, their sense of belonging may come from lack of alternative selection.
81/141
Appendix 15
2. Morale survey to mangers
1) Responses to questionnaires
Morale Survey answer for Manegers
(1)5S (6)Objectives Managem
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q114 Q15 Q16 Q17
1-01 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 4 2 1 4 3 2 2 4 21-02 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 2 4 4
2-01 5 4 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA2-02 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA2-03 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA
3-01 3 5 5 5 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 NA NA NA
4-01 4 4 3 2 4 2 4 2 5 4 3 3 4 2 2 2 4 3
5-01 2 3 4 4 4 3 1 3 2 2 3 2 NA 2 3 4 35-02 2 4 4 5 2 4 2 2 NA 3 2 NA NA NA 5 2 35-03 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 4
6-01 2 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 26-02 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 NA NA 2 4 NA NA6-03 4 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 3 2 46-04 4 2 4 4 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 1 5 5 4
7-01 2 3 5 3 3 2 2 2 4 NA 4 3 4 4 2 3 37-02 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 3 3 4 2 4 4 5 4 37-03 4 3 4 3 3 1 3 3 4 4 5 2 4 3 5 4 57-04 4 3 3 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 3 2 4 3 37-05 4 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
8-01 4 4 4 4 NA 4 2 NA 3 4 3 NA 3 2 3 4 38-02 5 5 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 4 1 NA NA NA 5 NA NA8-03 4 NA 2 2 NA 4 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 1 3
9-01 5 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 5 3 4 3 49-02 5 5 4 4 4 3 2 4 2 3 4 4 5 3 5 4 59-03 5 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 49-04 2 3 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3
10-01 5 5 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 5 1 310-02 5 2 4 3 5 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 5 1 310-03 4 2 4 2 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 1
11-01 11 2 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 5 4 4 4 4
12-01 4 5 3 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 5 3 4 5 412-02 4 2 2 3 4 2 1 3 2 1 3 5 5 4 3 4 412-03 2 2 1 2 4 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 5 4 3 4 4
13-01 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 313-02 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 3 5 2 5 5 4 5 5 5
14-01 5 4 4 5 5 4 1 1 2 2 4 3 5 4 5 5 414-02 4 3 5 3 4 2 2 2 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 1 414-03 4 3 5 3 4 2 2 2 4 3 3 5 3 3 5 1 4
15-01 5 5 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 4 3 3 5 2 5 2 315-02 2 5 3 5 5 5 2 4 3 4 4 3 4 1 5 2 215-03 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 5
16-01 4 3 2 2 3 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 316-02 5 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 5 3 4 5 5
1
2
All sector
10
12
13
9
14
15
16
Company's Name(2)Human Relations (3)Training
5
7
8
6
(4)Wagees Evaluation(7)Furnishing management
data(5)Planning
82/141
Appendix 15
2) Histogram of responses by elements
All Sector Morale Survey for Manage
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(7)Furnishing management data
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(4)Wagees Evaluation
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(3)Training
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(2)Human Relations
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1 2 3 4 5
(1)5S
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(5)Planning
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 2 3 4 5
(6)Objectives Management
Note 1:Not Realoty 2:Maybe to some extent 3: More or Less reasonably4: Good 5: Excellent
3) Radar chart by sector
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
(1)5S
(2)Human Relations
(3)Training
(4)Wagees Evaluation(5)Planning
(6)Objectives Management
(7)Furnishing management data
Metal
Agro
Textile
Chemical
Remarks: Substantial variances were revealed among sectors at manager level.
83/141
Appendix 15
4) Analysis and evaluation
Morale survey was conducted with 43 managers from 16 pilot project companies. Based on
the outcome, manager’s morale in terms of 5S, Human Resources and Organisation was
analysed for evaluation.
Questions Results Analysis & Consideration (1) 5S Good in model workplace
(56%) Very good (26%)
Among manager, 79% of them positively evaluate their degree of 5S practical implementation.
(2) Human Relations
Good (37%) Reasonably good (27%) Excellent (17%)
Most of managers (81%) believe the mutual relationship and good working environment in their companies.
(3) Training Not quite enough (47%)Not really (14%) Good (15%) Excellent (5%)
Among managers, 61% of them negatively replied while 20% is positive. The KAIZEN activities in companies having training system results achievement. Therefore, the establishment of training system would be very effective to activate KAIZEN activities.
(4) Wages Evaluation
Mostly properly done (35%)Maybe to some extent (30%) Very fairly done (7%)
Among manager, 69% of them replied that they evaluated and determined properly employee’s wages.
(5) Planning Very well managed (29%)Well managed (21%) To some extent (24%)
Among managers, total 74% conducts the planning while 11% replies “not at all” which result the wide gap among companies.
(6) Objectives Management
Good (29%) Excellent (19%) More or less reasonably (24%) Not at all or to some extent (28%)
Total 72% of managers replied positively while only 28% of them responded negatively. The objective management is so far well managed.
(7) Furnishing management data
Good (38%) More or less reasonably (24%) Excellent (5%) Not at all or to some extent (13%) Not really (11%)
Most of managers (77%) replied that they furnish management data well while 23% of them don't. There is a wide gap among companies. Especially, Agro sector is poor in furnishing management data compare to other sectors. Further, Japanese consultants recognised the poor administration of management data in companies through other means of inspection. Therefore, the evaluation of this indicator by companies may not be adequate.
Comprehensive Evaluation
Most of managers express their satisfaction for the KAIZEN activity, especially for 5S introduced by the pilot project.
84/141