appeal: 16-1110 doc: 20-1 filed: 01/30/2017 pg: 1 of 2 ... · 8/20/2015 · guardian ad litem...
TRANSCRIPT
FILED: January 30, 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 16-1110 (1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN)
___________________
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION; BUILDING ARIZONA FAMILIES, on behalf of itself and its birth-parent clients, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and D.V., Birth Parent; N.L., Birth Parent; T.W., baby boy, by and through his guardian ad litem Philip (Jay) McCarthy, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; KEVIN WASHBURN, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs; BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Defendants - Appellees.
___________________
O R D E R ___________________
Upon consideration of appellant’s unopposed motions to vacate judgment
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-1 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 Total Pages:(1 of 52)
and remand this case to the district court, the court grants the motion, vacates the
district court’s judgment, and remands this case to the district court with
instructions to dismiss the case as moot.
The clerk shall forward a copy of this order, accompanied by a copy of the
joint motion to vacate judgment and remand to the district court.
Entered at the direction of Judge Motz with the concurrence of Judge
Wilkinson and Judge Duncan.
For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-1 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 Total Pages:(2 of 52)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, on behalf of itself and its adoption agency members, and BUILDING
ARIZONA FAMILIES, on behalf of itself and its birth-parent clients,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. KEVIN HAUGRUD, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, MICHAEL S. BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, BUREAU
OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, and the UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1110
_________________________
UNOPPOSED SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS AND MOTION TO VACATE THE JUDGMENT OF THE DISTRICT COURT
_________________________
Counsel for Appellants
Lori Alvino McGill WILKINSON WALSH + ESKOVITZ 1900 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 847-4000
Matthew D. McGill GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8500
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 8 Total Pages:(1 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 50 Total Pages:(3 of 52)
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27 and Local Rule
27(f), plaintiffs National Council for Adoption (“NCFA”) and Building
Arizona Families (“BAF”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) respectfully move this
Court to vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia on the grounds that the case is moot. See
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39–40 (1950).
Defendants Kevin Haugrud, Michael S. Black, the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (“BIA”), and the United States Department of the Interior
(“Department”) (collectively “defendants”) have reviewed this motion and
do not oppose it or the relief requested herein.
I. The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C.
§§ 1901–1963, establishes “minimum Federal standards for the removal
of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children
in foster or adoptive homes.” 25 U.S.C. § 1902. On February 25, 2015,
the BIA, through the Department, published “Guidelines for State Courts
and Agencies in Indian Child Custody Proceedings.” 80 Fed. Reg. 10,146
(Feb. 25, 2015) (“2015 Guidelines”).
Plaintiffs filed suit in the Eastern District of Virginia challenging
the 2015 Guidelines as violating the Administrative Procedure Act
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 8 Total Pages:(2 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 50 Total Pages:(4 of 52)
3
(“APA”), the Equal Protection Clause, the Due Process Clause, the Indian
Commerce Clause, and the Tenth Amendment. NCFA moved for
summary judgment on its APA claims on July 30, 2015, Dkt. No. 20,1 and
on September 11, 2015, defendants cross-moved for dismissal for lack of
subject-matter jurisdiction and for judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. Nos.
50, 51.
The district court denied NCFA’s motion for summary judgment on
its APA claims on September 29, 2015, Dkt. No. 61 (EXHIBIT A), issuing
an opinion on October 20, 2015, Dkt. No. 66 (EXHIBIT B). On December
9, 2015, the district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and for
judgment on the pleadings, Dkt. Nos. 69 (EXHIBIT C), 70 (EXHIBIT D).
Plaintiffs timely appealed the district court’s decision to this Court on
February 3, 2016.2
On December 30, 2016, while this appeal was pending, the BIA,
through the Department, published revised “Guidelines for
Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act.” 81 Fed. Reg. 96,476 (Dec.
1 Docket citations refer to No. 15-cv-675 (E.D. Va.).
2 Plaintiffs’ opening brief in this appeal is currently due January 31, 2017; defendants’ response brief is due March 14, 2017; and any reply is due fourteen days from service of the response brief.
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 3 of 8 Total Pages:(3 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 3 of 50 Total Pages:(5 of 52)
4
30, 2016) (“2016 Guidelines”), https://www.bia.gov/cs/groups/public/
documents/text/idc2-056831.pdf. In enacting the 2016 Guidelines,
defendants expressly “replace[d] … the 2015 version[] of the
Department’s guidelines.” Id. Thus, as of December 30, 2016, the object
of this litigation has ceased to exist.
II. An actual controversy must exist at all stages of appellate
review. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18,
21 (1994). “Where it appears upon appeal that the controversy has
become entirely moot, it is the duty of the appellate court to set aside the
decree below and to remand the cause with directions to dismiss.” Great
W. Sugar Co. v. Nelson, 442 U.S. 92, 93 (1979) (internal quotation marks
omitted); see Munsingwear, 340 U.S. at 39–40. Thus, “[t]he customary
practice when a case is rendered moot on appeal” in this Court is “to
vacate the moot aspects of the lower court’s judgment.” Norfolk S. Ry.
Co. v. City of Alexandria, 608 F.3d 150, 161 (4th Cir. 2010); see also
Mellen v. Bunting, 327 F.3d 355, 364 (4th Cir. 2003) (“If a claim becomes
moot after the entry of a district court’s final judgment and prior to the
completion of appellate review, we generally vacate the judgment and
remand for dismissal.”).
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 4 of 8 Total Pages:(4 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 4 of 50 Total Pages:(6 of 52)
5
This procedure is required where, among other circumstances,
“mootness results from unilateral action of the party who prevailed
below.” Bancorp, 513 U.S. at 25; see also Arizonans for Official English
v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 72 (1997) (vacatur is required where “unilateral
action of the party who prevailed in the lower court” has denied the
appealing party the opportunity to seek review) (internal quotation
marks omitted). As this Court has explained, “[u]nder Bancorp, the
‘principal’ consideration in determining whether” vacatur is warranted is
whether “appellate review of the adverse ruling was prevented by ‘the
vagaries of circumstance’ or the ‘unilateral action of the party who
prevailed below.’” Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. Paige, 211 F.3d 112, 117
(4th Cir. 2000) (quoting Bancorp, 513 U.S. at 24–25).
Defendants’ withdrawal of the 2015 Guidelines has rendered
plaintiffs’ challenge to the 2015 Guidelines effectively moot, and this
appeal nonjusticiable. Accordingly, this Court should vacate the
judgment of the district court. See Munsingwear, 340 U.S. at 39–40;
Bancorp, 513 U.S. at 23–26.
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 5 of 8 Total Pages:(5 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 5 of 50 Total Pages:(7 of 52)
6
CONCLUSION
This Court should vacate the judgment of the district court and
remand the case with instructions that it be dismissed as moot.
Dated: January 24, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Matthew D. McGill Lori Alvino McGill Matthew D. McGill WILKINSON WALSH + ESKOVITZ GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1900 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 847-4000 Telephone: (202) 955-8500
Counsel for Appellants
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 6 of 8 Total Pages:(6 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 6 of 50 Total Pages:(8 of 52)
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that:
1. This motion complies with Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 27(d)(2) because it contains 750 words, excluding the parts
exempted by Rule 32(f).
2. This motion complies with the typeface requirements of Rule
32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Rule 32(a)(6) because it has
been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word
2016 in 14-point New Century Schoolbook font.
Dated: January 24, 2017
/s/ Matthew D. McGill Matthew D. McGill
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8500
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 7 of 8 Total Pages:(7 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 7 of 50 Total Pages:(9 of 52)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 24, 2017, I caused the foregoing
document to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court for the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit by using the
appellate CM/ECF system.
I further certify that on January 24, 2017, an electronic copy of
the foregoing document was served electronically by the Notice of
Docket Activity on counsel for all parties.
/s/ Matthew D. McGill Matthew D. McGill
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 955-8500
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-1 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 8 of 8 Total Pages:(8 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 8 of 50 Total Pages:(10 of 52)
EXHIBIT A
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 42 Total Pages:(9 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 9 of 50 Total Pages:(11 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 61 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 656Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 42 Total Pages:(10 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 10 of 50 Total Pages:(12 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 61 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 657Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 3 of 42 Total Pages:(11 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 11 of 50 Total Pages:(13 of 52)
EXHIBIT B
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 4 of 42 Total Pages:(12 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 12 of 50 Total Pages:(14 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 701Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 5 of 42 Total Pages:(13 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 13 of 50 Total Pages:(15 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 2 of 17 PageID# 702Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 6 of 42 Total Pages:(14 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 14 of 50 Total Pages:(16 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 3 of 17 PageID# 703Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 7 of 42 Total Pages:(15 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 15 of 50 Total Pages:(17 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 4 of 17 PageID# 704Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 8 of 42 Total Pages:(16 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 16 of 50 Total Pages:(18 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 5 of 17 PageID# 705Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 9 of 42 Total Pages:(17 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 17 of 50 Total Pages:(19 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 6 of 17 PageID# 706Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 10 of 42 Total Pages:(18 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 18 of 50 Total Pages:(20 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 7 of 17 PageID# 707Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 11 of 42 Total Pages:(19 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 19 of 50 Total Pages:(21 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 8 of 17 PageID# 708Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 12 of 42 Total Pages:(20 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 20 of 50 Total Pages:(22 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 9 of 17 PageID# 709Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 13 of 42 Total Pages:(21 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 21 of 50 Total Pages:(23 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 10 of 17 PageID# 710Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 14 of 42 Total Pages:(22 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 22 of 50 Total Pages:(24 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 11 of 17 PageID# 711Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 15 of 42 Total Pages:(23 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 23 of 50 Total Pages:(25 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 12 of 17 PageID# 712Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 16 of 42 Total Pages:(24 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 24 of 50 Total Pages:(26 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 13 of 17 PageID# 713Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 17 of 42 Total Pages:(25 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 25 of 50 Total Pages:(27 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 14 of 17 PageID# 714Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 18 of 42 Total Pages:(26 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 26 of 50 Total Pages:(28 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 15 of 17 PageID# 715Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 19 of 42 Total Pages:(27 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 27 of 50 Total Pages:(29 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 16 of 17 PageID# 716Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 20 of 42 Total Pages:(28 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 28 of 50 Total Pages:(30 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 66 Filed 10/20/15 Page 17 of 17 PageID# 717Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 21 of 42 Total Pages:(29 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 29 of 50 Total Pages:(31 of 52)
EXHIBIT C
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 22 of 42 Total Pages:(30 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 30 of 50 Total Pages:(32 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 743Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 23 of 42 Total Pages:(31 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 31 of 50 Total Pages:(33 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 2 of 17 PageID# 744Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 24 of 42 Total Pages:(32 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 32 of 50 Total Pages:(34 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 3 of 17 PageID# 745Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 25 of 42 Total Pages:(33 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 33 of 50 Total Pages:(35 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 4 of 17 PageID# 746Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 26 of 42 Total Pages:(34 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 34 of 50 Total Pages:(36 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 5 of 17 PageID# 747Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 27 of 42 Total Pages:(35 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 35 of 50 Total Pages:(37 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 6 of 17 PageID# 748Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 28 of 42 Total Pages:(36 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 36 of 50 Total Pages:(38 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 7 of 17 PageID# 749Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 29 of 42 Total Pages:(37 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 37 of 50 Total Pages:(39 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 8 of 17 PageID# 750Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 30 of 42 Total Pages:(38 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 38 of 50 Total Pages:(40 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 9 of 17 PageID# 751Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 31 of 42 Total Pages:(39 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 39 of 50 Total Pages:(41 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 10 of 17 PageID# 752Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 32 of 42 Total Pages:(40 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 40 of 50 Total Pages:(42 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 11 of 17 PageID# 753Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 33 of 42 Total Pages:(41 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 41 of 50 Total Pages:(43 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 12 of 17 PageID# 754Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 34 of 42 Total Pages:(42 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 42 of 50 Total Pages:(44 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 13 of 17 PageID# 755Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 35 of 42 Total Pages:(43 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 43 of 50 Total Pages:(45 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 14 of 17 PageID# 756Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 36 of 42 Total Pages:(44 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 44 of 50 Total Pages:(46 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 15 of 17 PageID# 757Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 37 of 42 Total Pages:(45 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 45 of 50 Total Pages:(47 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 16 of 17 PageID# 758Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 38 of 42 Total Pages:(46 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 46 of 50 Total Pages:(48 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 69 Filed 12/09/15 Page 17 of 17 PageID# 759Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 39 of 42 Total Pages:(47 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 47 of 50 Total Pages:(49 of 52)
EXHIBIT D
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 40 of 42 Total Pages:(48 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 48 of 50 Total Pages:(50 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 70 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 760Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 41 of 42 Total Pages:(49 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 49 of 50 Total Pages:(51 of 52)
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 70 Filed 12/09/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 761Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 18-2 Filed: 01/24/2017 Pg: 42 of 42 Total Pages:(50 of 50)Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-2 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 50 of 50 Total Pages:(52 of 52)