aplicaciones de la dinámica de fluidos computacional marcelo h
TRANSCRIPT
Aplicaciones de la DinAplicaciones de la Dináámica de mica de Fluidos ComputacionalFluidos Computacional
Marcelo H Marcelo H GarciaGarciaAlatna River, Alaska
Segundo Seminario de PotamologSegundo Seminario de Potamologíía a ““JosJoséé Antonio Maza Antonio Maza ÁÁlvarezlvarez””
RestauraciRestauracióón de rn de rííos para la sustentabilidad os para la sustentabilidad ambientalambiental
Villahermosa, Tabasco, 26 a 28 de Agosto de 2009Villahermosa, Tabasco, 26 a 28 de Agosto de 2009
The Amazon River
Bermejo River, ArgentinaIntroduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
To Amazon river
UCAYALI RIVER
Flow
~ 10 Km
~ 25 Km~ 3.5 Km
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Key features – subaerial meandering channel
1. Water super-elevation
2. Natural Secondary flow or helical flowa. Response of flow to local curvatureb. Fully developed secondary flow
3. Steady bed morphology (depositional near inner-bank and erosional near outer-bank)
Water
Air
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
cc RH
gHU
RHFrSt
22==
Response to local curvature and development of the natural secondary flow
~S2
~S4
~S6
~λd
0≈∂∂s
sn
Inner bank Outer bank
B
Inner bankOu
ter
ban
k
E ASTE AST
WESTWEST
VV11
VV44
VV33
VV22
F lo w m e te rF lo w m e te r
P umpP umpCS0
0CS0
0CS1
0CS1
0
C S 15
C S 15
CS20
CS20 CS3
0CS3
0
sk e we d
sk e we d
°=1100θ
mc 10~λ
2B=0.60mHc=0.40m
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
HTR
IP
CCG
Abad and Garcia (2009a)
Near Amazon river, Brazil(1)
In nature: Transitional secondary flows
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Randal Dinehart
Real bed morphology (bedforms)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Parsons et al. (2005)
Real bed morphology (bedforms)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
A
AA-A
δ
gas (φ<0.5)
liquid (φ>0.5)
5.0=φ (free surface)
real boundarynumerical boundary
� Finite element method (FEM), k- ε turbulence model, Unstructured mesh, Parallelizatio n with MPI, mesh partitioning with ParMETIS, parallel matrix solver with PETSc, LSM
Shedding bedforms
Abad and Garcia (2009b)Abad et al. (2009)
Real bed morphology (bedforms)
Using tetrahedral elements (only showing the triang les at the bed)
Hypothesis 1 Hypothesis 2 Hypothesis 3 Interpretation/Conclusions Future Research
Upstream conditionT = 1hr
RVR Meander:RVR Meander:
A A linearizedlinearized model for model for meandering migration for largemeandering migration for large --spatial scalesspatial scales
Abad and Garcia (2006)Abad and Garcia (2006)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
RVR Meander was developed using Visual C++, ArcObjects library
•Non-cohesive sediment• Quasi-steady condition
• Channel width is constant• Vertical banks• Bank erosion E (excess velocity)
RVR Meanderstand-alone
RVR Meanderfor GIS
(1) Pre-processing(2) Characterization of meandering rivers, (3) Planform migration
RVRMeander.exe
ArcGIS91RVRMeander.dll
RVR Meander (http://vtchl.uiuc.edu/our-work/software/rvrmeander/ )
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Enhancement of Enhancement of Conceptual modelConceptual model
Statistical analysis
Start
Input centerlines
Selection
End
River migration
Results
Statistical analysis module: requires 3 centerlines (t1, t2, valley)
River migration module: requires only one centerline (t1)
Input data : Initial curvature and perturbation velocity, α, Q, B, ds, #years, # iterations, EoInput data : Lag
time between t1 and t2, λmeander
Statistical analysis module : GUI showing parameters (Avg. shift, Sinuosity, Curvature, among other)
River migration module : GUI showing values of planform migration and drawing a new object ( Windows-based: polyline entity, GIS-based: shape file). Results can also be exported as ASCII file
Pre-processing
Characterization of rivers Planform evolution
RVR Meander flow chart
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
∑=
=
−=
4
1
1,)(
j
j
jji ssx α
∑==
−=
4
1
1,)(
j
j
jji ssy β
Guneralp & Rhoads (2006), Fagherazzi et al. (2004)
Parametric Cubic Splines
RVR Meander pre-processing tool (cubic splines and filtering)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
RVR Meander migration model
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
RVR Meander : Bermejo River RVR Meander : Bermejo River ApplicationApplication
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
2005
Bermejo River
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
1972
2000 2005
1989Puente Lavalle Puente Lavalle
Puente Lavalle Puente Lavalle
Bermejo River
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Puente Lavalle
Bermejo River: Upstream effect
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Puente Lavalle
Bermejo River: Downstream effect
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Possible cutoff
Bridge Lavalle
Bermejo River
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
___ 2005 January
___ 2005 August
Bridge Lavalle
Q = 1500 m3/s
_ _ Valley
Valley 1.1120372005 Jan 1.4770252005 Aug 1.555021Average-stream 1.516023Average-change 0.155993
Sinuosity
Averaged-Valley 0.001473Averaged-2005Jan 0.000611Averaged-2005Aug 0.000626Averaged-changed Valley
0.000619
Curvature
Averaged Absolute Normal 128.9875Averaged Absolute Transversal 79.91783Averaged Absolute Longitudinal 84.7112Shift ratio (tras/long) 0.943415Averaged Transversal -79.9178Averaged Longitudinal 30.80746Area reworked 195.5481
Shift
Bermejo River
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
If Lup < Lds� Upstream skewedIf Lup > Lds� Downstream skewed
Bermejo River: Migration between Jan 2005 to Aug 2005
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
1) External boundary condition imposed by Lavalle bridge (Abad et al., 2006, Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidraúlica, Venezuela)
The case of freely meandering rivers
The case of the Bermejo River
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
1) External boundary condition imposed by Lavalle bridge (Abad et al., 2006, Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidraúlica, Venezuela)
The case of self-formed meandering rivers (Christian A. Braudrick and Bill Dietrich)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
1) External boundary condition imposed by Lavalle bridge (Abad et al., 2006, Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidraúlica, Venezuela)
Experiments of self-formed meandering channels (Christian A. Braudrick and Bill Dietrich)T = 4 minutes, Q = 0.5 L/s T = 94 minutes, Q = 1.5 L/s T = 3.5 hours, Q = 0.76 L/s
T 10.8 hours, Q = 0.76 L/s T = 12.6 hours, Q = 1.5 L/s T = 13.5 hours, Q = 0.76 L/s
dλ dλdλ
dλ dλ dλ
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
CFD application to bank CFD application to bank erosion control erosion control –– a reacha reach --scale problemscale problem
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Sustainable Erosion ControlInstalling Willow Hurdles to Prevent Riverbank Erosion
- SW Londonhttp://www.slimwetwillows.co.uk/erosion.htm
Gabions
THE WES STREAM INVESTIGATION AND STREAMBANK STABILIZATION HANDBOOK
Surface armor
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Riverbank erosion control: direct methods
(a) Palisades (b) Impermeable dikes
http://www.seamentshorelinesystem.com/groins.html
THE WES STREAM INVESTIGATION AND STREAMBANK STABILIZATION HANDBOOK, 1997
(c) Board Fence Retard
(d) Jack field (retard) (e) Bendway Weirs on Harland CreekSUBMERGED VANES
Riverbank erosion control: indirect methods
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Brookside farm (Sugar creek)Brookside farm (Sugar creek)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Field measurements: Brookside farm (Sugar creek)
S1
S3S6 S4S7
S2
S8
S5
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Low-, medium- and high-flow conditions: Velocity mag nitude
Weir4Weir4Weir3Weir3Weir2Weir2Weir1Weir1
Weir5Weir5
Block 3
Weir4Weir4Weir3Weir3
Weir4Weir4Weir3Weir3
Weir4Weir4Weir3Weir3
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Near-bed U*: (a) Low-,(b) medium-,(c) high-flows
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Helical flow in a bend
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Secondary flow at Low-, medium- and high-flows
[4][4]
[4][4]
[4][4]
INNER BANKINNER BANKOUTER BANKOUTER BANKWeir4Weir4
Weir3Weir3
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Low flow: Weir 3 Stagnation line
Stagnation line
Stagnation line
WEIR 3Weir4Weir4
Weir3Weir3
Weir4Weir4
Weir3Weir3
Weir4Weir4Weir3Weir3
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Validation Section 4 – Low-flow condition
][ ][][][iMEAj
iMODj
iCOMj VVV −=
MEASURED MODELED DIFFERENCE
S1
S3S6 S4S7
S2S8
S5
BBW1
BBW2
BBW3BBW4
BBW5
(using k-e model)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Shear layer and free surface
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Near bed shear velocity (m/s)α = 90° (LES modeling)
α = 40° (LES modeling)
Introduction Background RVR Meander/Bermejo river Applications/BBW General Conclusions
Three-dimensional Hydrodynamics and Water Quality Modeling of the Chicago River, IL
Xiaofeng Liu, Sumit Sinha, Nahil Sobh, Marcelo H. Garcia
Chicago River
Simulation Results for DO at 36th Street
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
12/24/2007 1/3/2008 1/13/2008 1/23/2008 2/2/2008 2/12/2008 2/22/2008 3/3/2008 3/13/2008
Date
DO
(m
g/l)
36th Street Avg
36th Street Layer 1
36th Street Layer 2
36th Street Layer 3
36th Street Layer 4
Measurement
DO Depletions
CSO Events
Objectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
Bubbly Creek, Chicago
Regimes� dry periods: no flow� heavy storms: Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
Objectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
CSO event -“Phase 1”
Model: 2-D depth-averaged STREMR-HySedWq
Flowdirection
Phase 1
Objectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
CSO event - “Phase 1” – Hydrodynamics
After 7.66 hours After 7.66 hoursObjectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
“Phase 1” – Transport of sediments and water quality
Objectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
“Purification” scenariosSCENARIO 1: flow recirculation of 50 MGD (2.19 m3/s), northward flow in the creek Summer or after CSO event scenario; abstraction of daily fluctuation due to photosynthesis and respiration.� BOD: oxidation and settling � BOD concentration decreases; � DO: oxidation and sediment oxygen demand (SOD) from the bed � DO concentration decreases; reaeration from the atmosphere � DO concentration increases.
Objectives Bubby Creek The models CSO event “Purification” Conclusions
“Purification” scenarios (contd.)SCENARIO 2: flow recirculation (northward flow in the creek) plus supplemental aeration (1.31 g/s) in one location in the creekSCENARIO 3: flow recirculation (northward flow in the creek) plus supplemental aeration (1.31 g/s) in the recirculation pipe
Jackson et al.Science of the Total Environment
Evidence of Density Current at Confluence by Field Measurement
ADCP Uplooker Measurement at the Upstream of the Junction Shows Density Current due to CSO
CSO Event of 01/08/2008
CSO Event of 02/17/2008
� Influence factors– Main channel discharge– CSO discharge– CSO particle concentration
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Qcso=35 m3/s
Effects of Main Channel Flow Discharge
0200400600800
10001200140016001800
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Main Channel Normal Flow (m3/s)
Fron
t Loc
ation
(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Plun
ging P
oint (
m)
Front Location (m)Plunging Point (m)
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Main Channel Normal Flow (m3/s)
Fron
t Slop
e
Comentarios Finales
� En la ultima decada se han logrado grandes avances en la hidrodinamica computacional con aplicaciones en la hidraulica ambiental fluvial, ambiental y la morfodinamicade rios.� Es necesario complementar la modelacion numerica con
experimentos de laboratorio y observaciones de campo parapoder calibrar, verificar y validar los resultados numericos.� La modelacion numerica no es una panacea sino una
herramienta mas a disposicion de la ingenieria ambiental y fluvial que se debe utilizar con cautela, sentido comun, y sabiendo cuales son sus alcances y limitaciones.
Gracias
Racine Avenue Pumping Station, Chicago Illinois