ao assisting organization -...

AO Assisting Organization

ASU Adminstrative Support Unit

CBFM Community Based Forest Management

CENRO Community Environment and Natural Resoources Office

CFDF Community Forest Development Fund

CIC CENRO Inspection Committee

CRMF Community Resource Management Framework

CSD Comprehensive Site Development

DOLE Department of Labor and Employment

ECOLINC Environmental Cooperation and Linkages

FSP Forestry Sector Project

GASALBO Gamut Ug Salingsing sa Bohol, Inc.

GIS Geographical Information System

GLEAN Grassroots Linkages for Environmental Action Network

ICM Inspection Chart Mapping

IEC Information, Education and Communication

JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation

LGU Local Government Unit

M & E Monitoring and Evaluation

OGA Other Government Agencies

PO Peoples Organization

RIFCOREM Rizal Federation for Coastal Resource Management, Inc.

SMP Survey, Mapping and Planning

SUSIMO Subproject Site Management Office

WFP Work and Financial Plan

LIST OF ACRONYMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------ i

I. Subproject Description ----------------------------------------------------------- 1

1. Purpose/ Objectives

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

II. Subproject Implementation --------------------------------------------------- 11

1. Organizations for Implementing

Subproject

2. Implementation Period

3. Subproject Cost

4. Comments on Performance of

AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors

5. Other Matters Relating to

Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO Relating

To Recommendation(s) ------------------------------------------------------- 20

1. Recommendations made by the SUSIMO

2. Action Taken and Results

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance

Of the Subproject Facilities ------------------------------------------------- 21

1. Present Condition of Facilities

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure

For Operation and Maintenance (by year)

4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project -------------------------------------------- 29

1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations -------------------------------------------- 31

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1: Trainings Attended by the Peoples Organization --------------------- 33

Table 2: Subproject Performance ----------------------------------------------- 34

Table 3: Subproject Site Management Office Equipment --------------------- 35

Table 4: Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ----------------------------------36

Table 5a: Coco land Farming Livelihood Project----------------------------------37

Table 5b: Crab Fattening Livelihood Project-------------------------------------38

Table 5c: Photo Copying Livelihood Project---------------------------------------39

Table 5d: Mud Boat Fishing Livelihood Project-----------------------------------40

Table 5e: Chain Saw Services Livelihood Project---------------------------------41

Table 5f: Planer Services Livelihood Project-------------------------------------42

Table 5g: Lending Livelihood Project----------------------------------------------43

Table 5h: Lending Livelihood Project----------------------------------------------44

Table 5i: Lending Livelihood Project-----------------------------------------------45

Table 5j: Sari-Sari Store Livelihood Project- ----------------------------------- 46

Table 5k: Crab Fattening Livelihood Project--------------------------------------47

Table 5l: Rice Mill Livelihood Project----------------------------------------------48

Table 5m: Danggit & Bangus Culture Livelihood Project--------------------------49

Table 6: Subproject Status Report----------------------------------------------50

Table 7: Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity --------------------51

Table 8: Cost Estimate for Reforestation Per Activity-------------------------52

Table 9: Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity ---------------53

Table 10: Road Rehabilitation Infrastructure Project--------------------------54

Table 11: Annual Work and Financial Plan ----------------------------------------55

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Charts

1a-1. GLEAN, Inc. (CO Contractor)---------------------------------------- 57

1a-2. ECOLINK, Inc. (CO - Replacement)----------------------------------58

1b. RIFCOREM (PO Contractor)--------------------------------------------59

1c. GASALBO, Inc. (M&E Contractor) -------------------------------------60

1d. JEADA Construction, Inc. (Infra Contractor)-------------------------61

1e. SUSIMO-----------------------------------------------------------------62

2. Pictures---------------------------------------------------------------------------63

3. CSD Accomplishment Map-------------------------------------------------------66

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized

forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was

institutionalized by Executive Order No. 263 in 1995.

Before the adoption of CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of contract

reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the implementation

of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using the CBFM as its main strategy to

rehabilitate the fragile mangrove ecosystems, it empowered the beneficiary

communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming

them into environmentally responsible managers The tenurial right to manage

subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened

their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation

of these subprojects.

Rizal Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the tidal mudflats and

coastal waters of Mucielagos Bay within the municipalities of Rizal, Zamboanga

del Norte and Sapang Dalalga Mabini and Balinagao, Misamis Occidental. The

subproject covers parcels of inadequate stocked mangrove lands and open or

denuded areas interspersed along the coast.

The people’s organizations, Rizal Federation for the Coastal Resource

Management Inc. (RIFCOREM) was organized by Environmental Cooperation and

Linkages Inc from Sept.1, 2000 to Sept. 8, 2003. Under the Comprehensive Site

Development contract, the PO’s rehabilitated a total of 550 hectares of

mangrove and mudflats which were planted with bacauan or Rhizophora spp.

The CSD contract was implemented from January 2001 to June 2003 with a

total cost of Php 7.111 million. To assess the quality of established plantations

and the socio-economic impacts of the project, GASALBO, Inc. were contracted

to undertake Physical Validation and Institutional Project Benefit Assessment

on the area. Based on the latest evaluation, the overall weighted average survival

rate of the mangrove plantation was 90%.

To improve the accessibility of the barangay residents and marine products to

nearby markets, JAEDA Construction was contracted to rehabilitate the 0.8 km.

of farm to market road, which will be maintained by the Local Government Unit

of Rizal.

The project has provided regular employment not only to its members but also

to non-members of the PO’s. They participated in plantation establishment,

construction of infrastructure and livelihood projects. The latest socio-

institutional survey conducted by Green Shield Association revealed that the

average household annual income of the community members increased by 46 %

from PhP 76,652 to PhP 111, 911.

ii

The success of the project can be attributed to the unified efforts by the PO,

LGU and the SUSIMO. The environmental awareness of the community has

heightened to the extent that illegal cutting of mangrove and the conversion to

fishponds in the province has decreased.

1

SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

of

RIZAL MANGROVE REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT

Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

Forestry Sector Project

I. SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Rizal Mangrove

Rehabilitation Subproject is

situated along the Murcielagos

Bay. It has an area of 550

hectares and covers 10 coastal

barangays of Nasipang, Sebaca,

Balubohan, Mabunao, and

Damasing in Rizal, Zamboanga del

Norte and extends to Barangay

Casul, Caluya of Sapang Dalaga

Mabini, Misom and Punta Sulong

of Baliangao, Misamis Occidental

in Region 10.

The Project site lies between the latitude of 8 34’ 7” to 8 39’ 42” and

longitude of 123 31’ 42” to 123 36’ 6”. It is bounded on the north by

alienable and disposable land; on the south by Murcielagos Bay; on the

east by the Municipality of Sibutad and on the west by the Municipality

of Baliangao, Misamis Occidental.

It falls under the fourth climatic type characterized as having more or

less even distribution of rainfall throughout the year.

1. Purpose/Objectives

A) Original

(1) To immediately rehabilitate the open/denuded mud flats which

serve as habitat of migratory birds and other wildlife;

(2) To instill community concern and responsibility for the protection

and maintenance of coastal areas and its resources;

2

(3) To intensify protection efforts in coastal areas, to prevent the

use of illegal and destructive collecting/harvesting techniques

that will further degrade the coastal ecology;

(4) To provide employment/additional livelihood opportunities for

coastal communities;

(5) To enlist the participation of the community in the proper

conservation of the mangrove forest in the area; and

(6) Provide legal access of the community to other resources found in

the area, which could be the basis for sustainable livelihood

projects.

B. Modification

1. Modified purpose/objectives (there was no modification made)

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions.

A.1. Please check: There has been ( revision and/or modification or

no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and

dimensions.

A.2. If “revision and/or modification”, please complete the Table.

ITEM Original Scope and

Dimensions (At the time

of appraisal/Planned)

Revised/Modified

(Actual)

1. REFORESTATION/

WATERSHED/CBFM

A. SMA

B. CO 1

Year 1 and 2

1,034.7 ha

Area: 550 ha

Schedule: Sept. 1, 2000-

Sept. 1, 2002

Activities:

o Information

Dissemination

o Organizational

Building & Social

Preparation

o Technical and

Social Training

o Empowerment &

1,034.7 ha

Area: 550 ha

Schedule: Sept. 1, 2000 –

September 8, 2003

o Information

Dissemination

o Organizational

Building & Social

Preparation

o Technical and Social

Training

o Empowerment &

3

C. CSD

1. SOIL EROSION

CONTROL/SOIL

WATERSHED

CONSERVATION

a. Infrastructure

b. Trail and

footpath

c. Riverbank

Stabilization

2. VEGETATIVE

MEASURES2

a. Agroforestry

b. Assisted Natural

Regeneration

c. Enrichment

Planting

d. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bamboo

d.2. Rattan

d.3. Mangrove

d.4. Plantation Sp.

e. Timber Stand

Improvement

3. INVENTORY

RESIDUAL

FOREST

4. INCOME

ENHANCEMENT

SUBPROJECT

Institutionalizatio

n

o Procurement of

Seeds

o Infrastructure

o M&E for billing

purposes

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

550.0 hectares

N/A

N/A

N/A

Institutionalization

o Procurement of Seeds

o Infrastructure

o M&E for billing

purposes

Extension Period: The

same activities in Year 1

and 2 were continued

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

550.0 hectares

N/A

N/A

N/A

4

5. INFRASTRUCTURE

a. Bunkhouse

b. Look-out tower

c. Graveled Trail

d. Office

D. INFRASTRUCTURE

Farm to Market Road

E. MONITORING &

EVALUATION

Physical Component

Socio-Institutional

Component

2 units

4 units

6 km.

N/A

N/A

2 units

14 units

N/A

1 unit

.81 Kilometer

Area: 550 ha

Schedule: December 23,

2002 to May 23, 2003

Activities:

o Verification of

boundaries, UTM

monuments and

block Corner Posts

o Seedling Production

Inventory/Analysis

o Survival Counting

with 20% sampling

intensity including

mapping of

developed areas

o Height and

diameter

measurement,

assessment of

overall health

appearance

o Physical inspection

of Infrastructure

o Project

Management Cost

and Report

preparation

Area: 550 ha

Schedule: December 23,

2002 to April 23, 2003

5

2. SUSIMO

o Equipment3

provided to the

Office

o Researches

conducted

o Trainings4

Attended

Activities:

o Courtesy Calls and

Pre-assessment

Meetings

o Data Collection and

Preliminary

Assessment

- Secondary Data

Gathering

- Primary Data

Gathering

o Preparation and

Presentation of

Draft Report

o Preparation and

Submission of Final

Report

3 units Boat/ Banca

3 units Motorcycle 1

unit Power Generator

1 unit Computer

1 unit Printer

1 unit UPS

1 unit GIS Maptitude

2 units GPS

2 units Handheld Radio

1 unit Base Radio

2 units Forester's Transit

1 unit Manual Typewriter

4 units Brunton Compass

2 units Steel Nylon Tape

2 units Diameter Tape

1 unit Planimeter

4 units Abney Hand Level

1 unit Rain Gauge

3 units Binocular 1 unit Lettering Set

N/A

- Orientation Seminar on

6

o Others

Mangrove Subproject

Implementation under FSP

- FSP Mangrove Action

Planning Workshop

Workshop on the

Implementation of Capital

Build-up System for

Community-Based Forest

Management Project

- FSP Year-end Physical

and Financial

Reconciliation Workshop

for CY 2001 Planning

Workshop

- FSP Mid-Year Physical

and Financial Assessment

and Action Planning

Workshop

- Hands-on Training on the

Application of Global

Positioning System (GPS)

Receiver

- Re-orientation Course of

Project Implementors of

Mangrove Subproject

Sites

- FSP Phase-out/ Phase-in

Planning Workshop

-FSP Action Planning

Workshop

- SUSIMO Office Building

1 Please Refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs 2 Table 2 for the details of the subproject performance in terms of area planted 3 Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4 Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions

B.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject

scope and dimensions.

Please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.

Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.)

7

Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate

Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost

Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical

condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil

condition, etc.)

Natural disaster/unseasonable weather

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing

Agency

Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned

(e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies,

etc.)

Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency,

fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems

Procurement problems

Performance of contractor/supplier

Performance of consultant

Change in construction period

Others

B.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)

Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical

condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil

condition, etc.)

The original plan of the Subproject was to establish 932 hectares

based on the appraisal report. However, during the final inspection

made by the NFDO TA-Consultant, it was observed that open 382

hectares of mudflats area in the proposed site has been the

growth bed of sea grasses. Since the sea grasses can provide the

same environmental effect the mangrove gives, specifically in

enrichment of fishery resources, the proposed rehabilitation area

was reduced to 550 hectares to avoid disturbing the sea grasses

bed. With this shortfall of the area under the jurisdiction of

DENR Region nine (9), Subproject area was expanded to include

the coastal barangays of the Municipality of Sapang Dalaga and

Baliangao, Misamis Occidental of Region 10 maintaining the same

revised target.

C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

C.1. (Sub) Sector(s) to which the Subproject belongs

Electric power and Gas Telecommunication Social services

(Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunications Watersupply

8

Power Plants Broadcasting Sewerage

Transmission lines Education

Distribution Systems Irrigation and Flood control Health

Gas Irrigation Tourism

Others Flood control others

Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Roads Agriculture and Forestry

Bridges Fisheries

Railways

Airport Mining and Manufacturing

Ports Mining

Marine Transportation Manufacturing

Others

C.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description

Comprehensive Site Development

(Flood Control)

Socio-Economic Development

(Social Services)

The rehabilitation of the coastal area for

Rizal Mangrove Subproject will eventually

protect the marine ecosystem providing

overall balance of the environment.

Aquatic resources stock will improve

since the mangrove areas will serve as

nesting and spawning ground for the

wildlife marine fauna species.

The improvement of the mangrove forest

cover will prevent the scouring of the

coastal area. It will serve as a buffer,

which protects the community from

strong winds and waves especially during

the occurrence of typhoons.

The Rizal Mangrove Subproject

envisioned to improve the socio-economic

condition of the community residing

within and the adjacent areas of the

Subproject. There will be an increase in

fish catch and more employment will be

generated.

It is also anticipated that the PO will

establish viable livelihood projects that

9

Land Tenure (CBFMA)

Environmental Awareness

(Education)

would support the sustainability of the

organization and the continuous

maintenance and protection of the

established mangrove plantations. These

income-generating activities will surely

increase the household income of the

involved communities.

Provision of CBFMA as a land tenure

instrument over the area will encourage

other communities and individual families

to participate in the continued

development and protection of the

mangrove area. The vested right will

create a sense of ownership over the

developments introduced in a particular

mangrove area.

The successful and sustained

rehabilitation of the mangrove areas will

promote environmental awareness among

direct/indirect beneficiaries of the

Subproject. The community will be

encouraged to continuously protect and

maintain the plantation, which will

redound to positive impacts on the

environment.

C.3. Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description

Issuance of the Community Based

Forest Management Agreement

(CBFMA) as a Land Tenure Right

over the area.

The PO comprising 11 participating

barangays was already awarded with

the CBFMA with a total area of

1,034.70 hectares including the 550

hectares plantation established under

FSP.

This tenurial instrument provides the

PO, the right to sustainably continue

the development of the CBFM area and

its resources, especially the marine

resources.

10

Established viable livelihood

projects.5

Development of the Mangrove area

(Fisheries)

Employment Generation/ Increase

in Household Income

Rehabilitation of .8 km Farm to

Market road as infrastructure

component of the project.

(Road)

Through its formulated Community

Resource Management Framework

(CRMF), future undertakings/business

ventures considered by the

stakeholders of the project will be

implemented.

The PO has established viable livelihood

projects such as rice mill, mud crab

fattening, coconut plantation, among

others.

The established livelihood projects will

be further developed with subsidized

funding from their accumulated

Community Forest Development Fund

(CFDF) and share from retention fund.

The diversity of marine ecosystem and

the vegetative cover of the area were

improved with the mangrove

restoration. Yield of fishery and shells

harvest within the area increased.

The project provided employment to

the members of the participating

barangays through the Comprehensive

Site Development and the established

livelihood projects of the organization.

Further, individual members were also

able to establish their own businesses.

Still others were able to buy pump

boats, motorcycles, and home

appliances. Reconstruction of their nipa

huts to more stronger ones made of

concrete as well as children being sent

to school even up to college became

evident.

Rehabilitation of farm-to-market road

greatly helped the community in

transporting their marine products to

nearby market and barangays with ease.

It is expected that in the future the

LGU of Rizal will continuously improve

11

Awareness of the community in the

sustainable development.

(Education)

the newly rehabilitated farm-to-market

road to facilitate transport of goods to

nearby markets.

The Subproject area was once a dense

mangrove forest and provided economic

opportunities as well as environmental

benefits for the communities residing

in and around the area. However, the

cutting of mangrove trees for charcoal

making and conversion of the land into

fishponds led to its degraded condition.

With the community organizing

activities of the Subproject, the

communities were enlightened on the

importance of the mangrove area in

their lives. Development of the

degraded coastal area was easily

implemented. Maintenance and

protection activities were not only

focused within the established

plantations, but also within the

remaining mangrove forests. The

community with the support of the LGU

worked hand in hand to deter illegal

activities that may cause degradation

of the area. Certain policies and

regulations were formulated and

imposed by the LGU for the sustainable

development of the mangrove

ecosystem.

Please refer to Table 5 for the Livelihood project being implemented by the POs

II. SUBPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

I. Organizations for Implementing Subproject

Function in the

Subproject

Implementation

Name of Organization Reasons for

Change (1) Original (2) Changed

1. SMA

By Admin

N/A

12

2. AO for CO

3. Assisting

Professional

4. People’s

Organization

5. M&E Contractor

6. Infrastructure

Contractor

Grassroots

Linkages for

Environmental

Action Network,

Inc. (GLEAN,

Inc.)

N/A

Rizal Federation

For Coastal

Resource

Management,

Inc.

(RIFCOREM,

Inc.)

Gamut Ug

Salingsing Sa

Bohol, Inc.

(GASALBO, Inc.)

JEADA

Construction

Environmental

Cooperation and

Linkages, Inc.

(ECOLINC)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Terminated

Please state:

1.1 Reasons for the change

Community Organizing

GLEAN, Inc. was terminated in April 2001 after a negative feedback

from the evaluation/validation conducted by the joint evaluating team

of CENRO, PENRO, SUSIMO and DENR-Regional office. GLEAN, Inc.

failed to comply with the terms and conditions stipulated in the

approved contract for community organizing activities during the six

months of its implementation period.

1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results

13


The CO contractor encountered financial problems and just relied on

payments of billings to be able to sustain its activities that

consequently led to insufficient delivery of services to the PO. The

DENR top management terminated the contract of the first CO

contractor (GLEAN, Inc.) and re awarded another contract to a

qualified AO for the continuation of the CO activity. The remaining

CO activities were fully complied with by the new AO and such other

services for the PO duly accomplished.

Untoward human activities

It has been the practice of fishermen to cross over the plantation

during high tide. Their pump boats/ bancas cause destruction of some

mangrove propagules and hamper the growth of the plantation. The

PO strengthened its monitoring and protection activities and regularly

checked the condition of the perimeter fence surrounding the

plantations. Intensive monitoring by the PO was done and the

fishermen were properly guided on which route to take.

1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation

of the

Subproject is ( attached or not available).

The Organizational Chart are attached as Annex 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, and

1f for Grassroots Linkages for Environmental Action Network, Inc.

(GLEAN, Inc.), Environmental Linkages and Cooperation, Inc.

(ECOLINC) (CO contractors), Rizal Federation for Coastal Resource

Management, Inc (RIFCOREM, Inc.) (PO), Gamut Ug SalingsingSa

Bohol, Inc. (GASALBO, Inc.) (M&E contractor), JEADA Construction

(Infra Contractor), and SUSIMO-Rizal Mangrove Rehabilitation

Subproject, respectively.

1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please

state the reason.

2. Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

Please fill in the following blanks with actual period for each item.

14

ITEM

ORIGINAL SCHEDULE

ACTUAL PERIOD

1) Contract for SMP

2) Contract of AO for

CO

3) Contract of PO for

CSD

4) Contract of NGO for

M&E

5) Contract of

Infrastructure

Component

Completion

(Completion of

Subproject)

N/A

September 1, 2000 to

September 1, 2002

January 2001 to

December 2003

December 23, 2002 to

May 23, 2003

November 2002- May

15, 2003

June 2003

N/A

September 1, 2000 to

September 8, 2003

January 2001 to June

2003

December 10, 2002 to

May 23, 2003

November 2002-

November 21, 2003

December 2003

Please refer to Table 6 for the Subproject Status report

Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion

ceremony or final disbursement or other than the above.

The completion date was scheduled for June 2003 (at the time of

appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion

B.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s)

from the following list and check.

Change in scope/dimensions

Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon,

etc.)

Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate

Problems in procurement (propagules)

Inflation

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency

15

Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned

(e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies,

etc.)

Legislative matters

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems


Performance of consultant

Others

B.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion



The implementation of Community Organizing Component was not

conducted continuously because the first CO contract awarded to

GLEAN; Inc. was terminated due to their poor performance. After

the termination, the regional office experienced difficulty in re-

awarding the CO contract to a qualified NGO because most of those

interested to bid refused to accept the contract due to additional

barangays involved in the expansion area for development under

Region 10. The CO contract was awarded to ECOLINC after one (1)

year and four (4) months, The re-awarding was made on the latter

part of the project implementation.

Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon,

etc.)

Infrastructure Component

The completion of the infrastructure project was delayed due to

negative slippage brought about heavy rains, which greatly affected

the working operation of the contractor.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay


During the time when there was no Assisting Organization, the

SUSIMO personnel and staff through its Community Organizing and

Strengthening Unit (COSU) helped the PO in facilitating every

activity with regard to organizational management matters. They also

conducted several organizational and financial management

16

trainings/workshops for the PO until the new Assisting Organization

came in.

Infrastructure Component

To make use of the period when it was not possible to continue with

the infrastructure operation because of heavy rains, the ISTaf team,

site engineer, T.A. engineer and the contractor conducted several

meetings and formulated strategies that helped the contractor

finished the infrastructure at a given extension period without

additional funds.

3. Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by

Component)

Please refer to Tables 7,8, and 9 for the details on cost of CO, CSD, and M&E. List of infra

project with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 10

B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and

Actual Expenditure….

B.1. If there is any difference between Table a.1 and Table a.2 in

Paragraph a, please choose the reason(s) from the following

list and check.

Item

Original Cost

(based on appraisal)

(in M pesos)

Actual Expenditures

(in M pesos)

Survey Mapping and

Planning

Community Organization

Comprehensive Site

Development

Monitoring

and Evaluation

Infrastructure Dev’t

Subproject Coordinating

Office

0.989999

7.111743

0.563150

2.041163

2.395780

0.659000

7.111743

0.563150

2.041163

2.395780

Grand Total 13.101835 12.770836

17

Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural

disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)

Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction

period

Increase or decrease arising from inflation

Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the

exchange rate

Increase or decrease arising from a change in the

scope/work volume of the Subproject

Decrease arising from keen competition in tender


Agency

Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems

Others

B.2. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background


Agency


The amount intended for the activities under the contract of

GLEAN, Inc. was excluded in the total contract cost of the new

AO (ECOLINC), tapped by the DENR to continue the CO activities.

The intended amount was retained at the regional office.

B. Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results (N/A)

D. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual

Expenditure (by Year)

Calendar

Year

Original Cost

(based on appraisal)

Actual Expenditures

2000

2001

2002

2003

0.328000

3.523840

2.803800

6.446195

0.328000

3.257840

4.081958

5.103037

Total 13.101835 12.770836 Please refer to Table 11 for the details on the Annual Work and Financial Plan..

18

4. Comments on Performance of Assisting Organizations (AOs),

Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and

Infrastructure contractors.

Please describe the performance of each organization after checking

the item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.

A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting

Professionals (if any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and

Infrastructure contractors

A.1. Overall performance Design

Contract administration Construction

supervision

Expertise Staff qualifications

Coordinating ability Compliance with Contracts

Performance related to any other than the Subproject

scope, if any.

Others

Staff qualifications

Compliance with Contracts

Coordinating ability

A.2 Description (in detail)

Coordinating ability

Assisting Organization

The performance of the first CO contractor (GLEAN, Inc.),

was rated poor. The staff deployed in the area had

insufficient knowledge and skills and did not meet the

expected services needed by the PO. On the other hand, the

second Assisting Organization (ECOLINC), performed

satisfactorily in accomplishing all the activities stipulated in

the work and financial plan. The AO managed to

perform/implement the activities without additional cost

despite the expansion in Project coverage.

Overall performance established

People’s Organization – RIFCOREM, Inc.

The PO performed well in the development and maintenance of

the 550 hectares mangrove plantation with 90% survival rate

and has achieved the required DENR standard. The PO

established several livelihood projects and plans to implement

19

more that will facilitate the continuity of operations and

finance the protection and maintenance activities of their

established plantations.

Overall performance

Expertise

Monitoring and Evaluation Contractor

The contractor performed satisfactorily. They have completed

the planned activities on time in accordance with the approved

Work and Financial Plan.

Construction supervision

Compliance with Contracts

Infrastructure Component Contractor

It was observed that the performance of the contractor was

very poor. The contract duration was not strictly followed,

thus, the construction was not completed as scheduled.

5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any

comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and

results in (B) below.

A. Technical Financial Institutional Economic

Social/Distributional Others

B. Description (in detail)

Financial

During the time of the first AO (GLEAN, Inc.), the contractor

encountered financial problems and just relied on the payments paid

by the DENR to enable them to operate. This resulted to inadequate

delivery of services to the PO. The DENR management terminated the

contract of the first CO contractor and re-awarded a new contract to

a qualified NGO. The remaining CO activities were fully accomplished

by the new AO. The expected services of the AO for the PO were

also accomplished enabling the PO to learn many things and thus

worked efficiently with regards to project management.

20

III. ACTION TAKEN BY THE AOs, APs and POs RELATING TO

RECOMMENDATION (S)

1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are

given in Annex – I herewith or not applicable. There has been no

recommendation with regard to the Subproject).

2. Action Taken and Results

Issue/Recommendation Action Taken Results

1. During the initial

implementation of

livelihood project of the

PO, the SUSIMO

recommended to the PO

to change the Bangus and

Danggit Culture into Crab

fattening for it is more

feasible in the area and

less expensive compared

to Bangus and Danggit

Culture.

The PO adopted the

recommendation of the

SUSIMO and they

implemented crab

fattening as their

livelihood project at

Sitio Tahica, Sebaca,

Rizal, ZDN.

The crab-fattening

project is on-going

and as of December

2003 has

accumulated a net

income of PHP

4,000.00.

2. During the initial stage

of project

implementation, the PO

had insufficient

knowledge in terms of

CSD operation and

financial management of

the organization. The

SUSIMO suggested to

the AO that financial

training needs of the PO

should be prioritized and

the technical needs of

the PO in CSD operation

be provided by the

SUSIMO.

The AO facilitated

several trainings on

financial management

and organizational

management while on

the CSD technical

operation; the

SUSIMO with its

SDMU unit trained

their technical

counterparts from the

PO.

All required trainings

with regard to

financial and

technical management

of the PO were

provided both by the

AO and the SUSIMO.

Financial matters of

the PO were properly

recorded and

managed. The

technical capability

of the PO has

improved

considerably.

4. The SUSIMO advised

the PO to conduct regular

audit of their finances

The PO agreed and the

PO auditor conducted

regular auditing of

their finances.

Finances of the PO

were properly

recorded.

21

IV.INITIAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SUBPROJECT

FACILITIES

1. Present Condition of Facilities

A.Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or not

applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial operation

started). If there have been any problems, please check the relevant

space in the Table.

PO-RIFCOREM

Item Status Initial

Operation

Maintenance Managem

ent

Others

1.Gas Range

2.Refrigerator

3.Steel

Cabinet

4.Typewriter

5.Cross Cut

Saw

6.Tape

Measure

7.Camera

8.Xerox

Machine

9.Rice Miller

10. Boat

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

SUSIMO-RIZAL

Item Status Initial

Operation

Maintenance Manage

ment

Others

1.Boat/ Banca

2.Motorcycle

3.Power

Generator

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

22

5. Computer

6. Printer

7. UPS

8. GIS

Maptitude

9. GPS

10. Handheld

Radio

11. Base Radio

12. Forester's

Transit

13. Manual

Typewriter

14. Brunton

Compass

15. Steel Nylon

Tape

16. Diameter

Tape

17. Planimeter

18. Abney Hand

Level

19. Rain Gauge

20. Binocular

21.Lettering Set

22.SUSIMO

Office

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

/

/

/

B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following

reason(s).

Technical Financial Institutional Economic

Social/Distributional Others

C. Description (in detail)

Technical

The PO and the SUSIMO encountered problems regarding technical

aspects of the equipment. Regular maintenance and repair were

necessary for their worn-out equipment. Similarly, efficiency of

motorcycles used by the SUSIMO were also affected by decrepitude.

Maintenance and repair of the vehicles were done more frequently.

23

Availability of Spare parts

The SUSIMO encountered problems in the repair of the base radio

because of the unavailability of the needed spare parts. Until now, the

base radio is non-serviceable because of lack of available spare parts.

D. Aspect of utilizing the Subproject facilities

For the SUSIMO

ITEM ORIGINAL PLAN

ACTUAL

OPERATION

1 Boat/Banca For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

2 Power Generator For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

3 Motorcycle For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

4 Computer For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

5 Printer For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

6 UPS For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

7 GIS For the SUSIMO CENRO-Dapitan

8 GPS For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

9 Handheld Radio For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

10 Base Radio For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

11 Forester’s Transit For the SUSIMO CENRO-Dapitan

12 Manual Typewriter For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

13 Brunton Compass For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

14 Steel Nylon Tape For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

15 Diameter Tape For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

16 Planimeter For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

17 Abney-Hand Level For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

18 Rain Gauge For the SUSIMO CENRO-Dipolog

19 Binocular For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

20 Lettering Set For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

21 SUSIMO Office For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

22 Life Jacket For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

23 Camera For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

24 Calculator For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

25 Office tables For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

26 Chairs For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

27 Flashlights For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

28 Petromax For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

24

29 Cellular Phone For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

30 Computer table For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

31 Refrigerator For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

32 Double Deck Bed For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

33 Water Dispenser For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

34 Tape Recorder For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

For the PO-RIFCOREM

ITEM ORIGINAL PLAN

ACTUAL

OPERATION

1 Gas Range For the PO For the PO

2 Refrigerator For the PO For the PO

3 Steel Cabinet For the PO For the PO

4 Typewriter For the PO For the PO

5 Cross Cut Saw For the PO For the PO

6 Measuring Tape For the PO For the PO

7 Camera For the PO For the PO

8 Xerox Machine For the PO For the PO

9 Rice Mill For the PO For the PO

10 Boat For the PO For the PO

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of PO/ SUSIMO

A.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.

PO: Rizal Federation for Coastal Resources Management Inc.

(RIFCOREM)

SUSIMO: Rizal Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject Site

Management Office- Administrative Support Unit (ASU)

A.2. Please check:

The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the

Subproject facilities is ( attached or not available).

A.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state

the reason.

B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and

Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

25

PO: 6 Officers and 9 Board of Directors

SUSIMO: 7 Personnel

C. Please check and explain the following.

C.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or insufficient).

If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum

number of staff and your plan for providing them.

C.2. Average employment period of the present staff

PO: 3 years

SUSIMO: 5 Years

C.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of

the staff, its contents and expected effects.

None

1. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance

(By Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

SUSIMO

Item

Calendar year

Maintenance Operation Total

2001

2002

2003

0.512000

0.195000

0.212000

0.650000

0.336000

0.481780

1.162000

0.531000

0.693780

Total 0.919000 1.467780 2.386780

PO-RIFCOREM

Item

Calendar year

Maintenance Operation Total

2001

2002

2003

The PO did not

allot budget for

the operation

and maintenance

of their

facilities. The

budget was

provided as the

need arises.

Total

26

B.Actual and Currently Expected Expenditures

SUSIMO

Item

Calendar

year

Mainte-

nance Operation

Maintenance

& Operation

Total

for expanded portion

2001

Computer

Typewriter

Office

0.020700

0.012300

0.045000

0.020700

0.012300

0.045000

Subtotal 0.078000 0.078000

2002

Computer

Typewriter

Motorcycle

Boat/Banca

Office

0.009200

0.098500

0.021700

0.075300

0.014200

0.007600

0.065000

0.046200

0.055000

0.023400

0.007600

0.163500

0.067900

0.130300

Subtotal 0.204700 0.188000 0.392700

2003

Computer Typewriter

Motorcycle

Boat/Banca

Office

0.009200

0.023000

0.008000

0.002100

0.005000

0.055000

0.017800

0.067500

0.011300

0.005000

0.078000

0.025800

0.067500

Subtotal 0.040200 0.147400 0.187600

2004

0.100000

0.100000

Total 0.244900 0.413400 0.100000 0.758300

PO- RIFCOREM

Item

Calendar year

Mainte-

nance Operation

Maintenance &

Operation

(For expanded

portion)

Total

2001

Typewriter

Camera

Boat

0.021000

0.005500

0.025000

0.005000

0.006000

0.011000

0.026000

0.011500

0.036000

27

Subtotal 0.051500 0.022000 0.073500

2002

Typewriter

Camera

Boat

0.006000

0.006500

0.015000

0.006000

0.006500

0.015000

Subtotal 0.027500 0.027500

2003 Xerox Machine

Rice Miller

Typewriter

Camera

Handheld

Radio

Boat

0.021300

0.013700

0.011200

0.016400

0.007000

0.007500

0.004600

0.022300

0.032500

0.030100

0.007000

0.007500

0.004600

0.022300

Subtotal 0.035000 0.069000 0.104000

Total 0.205000

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement

or any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan

for the same.

No amount was given for the expanded portion of maintenance and

operation of facilities for the PO. Cost provided was based on actual

disbursement. In the case of SUSIMO, facilities were maintained

depending on the fund allocation downloaded by the NFDO. However, it

will be the responsibility of the concerned CENRO to oversee and

maintain these facilities when it will be turned over to their custody.

Maintenance could be sourced out from the DENR regular funds.

1. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method

B. Frequency

C. Others, if any.

28

PO-RIFCOREM

Equipment/ Facility Method Frequency

1. Xerox Machine

Repair in case of

malfunctions

Replacement of toner

and ink

As the need arises

As the need arises

2. Handheld Radio

Repair in case of

system malfunctions

Replacement of busted

battery

As the need arises

As the need arises

3. Typewriter

Cleaning and

Lubrication

Ribbon Replacement

As the need arises

Once a Year

4. Boat

Cleaning and

Maintenance of Hull

Change oil

Replacement of

crossed joined/Bearing

Replacement of

Propeller Shaft and

Propeller Blade

Replacement of Busted

Sparkplug

Every week

Every three months

As the need arises

As the need arises

Every three months

29

SUSIMO

C. Others, if any

V. Benefits derived from the Subproject

1. Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s), which are dealt with this Article

by you.

Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the

Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)

Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the

sector(s) after completion)

Equipment/ Facility Method Frequency

1. Motorcycle Replacement of

Sparkplug

Replacement of sprocket

Replacement and Repair

of Roller Chain

Replacement of

Connecting Rod,

Reboring of Cylinder,

Replacement of Piston

kit, and Refacing of

Camshaft

Replacement of Tire

Once a year

Once a year

Twice a year

As the need arises

As the need arises

2. Typewriter Replacement of roller

and cleaning

Every 2 months

3. Computer Replacement of ink

Bond paper supply

Every 2 months

Every 1 month

4. Boat/Banca Cleaning and

Maintenance of Hull

Change oil

Replacement of crossed

joined/ Bearing

Replacement of

Propeller Shaft and

Propeller Blade

Replacement of Busted

Sparkplug

Every week

Every three months

As the need arises

As the need arises

Every 2 months

30

Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region)

Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s)

and/or the region concerned

B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.

Employment Generation

During the implementation of the CSD, job opportunities were

opened to all participating communities especially the plantation

establishment and maintenance activities of the mangrove

subproject. With the Project, an employment of around 48, 289

man-days was generated, thus, reducing the unemployment

problem at the community level. As of now, employment generation

program of the PO is still ongoing. The established livelihood

project is also a potential source of employment even within family

level.

Income Raising

There was an increase in income of the project beneficiaries due

to employment opportunities during the Project as well as

livelihood implementation by the PO. At the time of appraisal, the

annual average household income of the community was

PHP76,652.00. After the project implementation, the annual

average household income increased to PHP 111,911.92 or

approximately 46% based on the final validation for Institutional

Project Benefit Assessment (IPBA) conducted by Green shield

Association. Indicators of socio-economic upliftment can be

observed in the community such as improvement of individual

houses, opportunities for their children to go to school and

continue up to college level, procurement of household

facilities/equipment and implementation of backyard livelihood

income generating projects of individual families.

31

VI. Conclusion and Recommendations

The overall implementation of Rizal Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject

has formed endless experiences within the PO and adjacent communities.

Its positive socio-economic and environmental impacts had not only

shaped the minds and hearts of the people in rehabilitating their vast

mangrove areas but also had created a chain effect to other provinces of

the region.

The success of the subproject was also attributed by the dedication and

commitment of the SUSIMO personnel, LGUs and most especially the

Peoples Organization (RIFCOREM, Inc.). Without their concerted and

unified efforts, the goals of the subproject could never be achieved.

To sustain the operation of the Subproject and the PO, the

following are recommendations:

With the completion of the subproject, the concerned CENRO and

PENRO offices should monitor the PO. The PO should be reminded

to further intensify the Monitoring and Protection activities of

the subproject;

The PO must widen their linkages with other government and non-

government entities. This is necessary so that their association

will be able to avail of any assistance that is necessary for their

success;

The PO to coordinate with Local Government Unit of Rizal to

insure the good condition of the farm-market-road;

The DENR must ensure that staff of assisting organizations to

conduct community-organizing activities will deploy competent

staffs in the field level with the necessary knowledge and skills to

enhance the POs technical and social capabilities;

The inclusion of rigid training course and orientation for DENR

personnel for forthcoming similar mangrove rehabilitation

project/programs;

32

Technical Consultants should visit the project site often to

provide technical advice and recommendations on the proper

implementation of the project;

Rigorous screening of staff and a continuing staff development

program should be implemented to ensure a high level performance

of Subproject Management Office.

33


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 1.TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE PEOPLES ORGANIZATION

TRAININGS TRAINORS

NO. OF

PARTICI-

PANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

1. Initial Training on

CSD Operation

GLEAN, Inc. (AO) &

SUSIMO Staff

25 February 9-10, 2001

2. Capability Building GLEAN, Inc. (AO) 25 March 16-17, 2001

3. Basic Bookkeeping

Seminar

Federation Treasurer &

Day Care Teacher

9 6-Apr-01

4. 2nd CSD Training SUSIMO 70 1-Oct-01

5. Capability Building GLEAN, Inc. (AO) 25 23-Jun-01

6. Milkfish Culture BFAR (Province of

Zamboanga del Norte)

27 November 22, 2001

7. CBFMP Orientation REGION/PENRO/CENR

O and SUSIMO

Personnel

70 Jan. 31, 2001 &

February 1, 2002

8. CRMF/RUP/AWP

Workshop

Region and SUSIMO

personnel

35 June 20, 2002

9. Mud Crab Fattening BFAR-ZDN & MAO-

Rizal

28 October 30, 2002

10. PMES and Value

Formation

ECOLINC, Inc. (AO) and

DENR Region 10

personnel

31 March 8-9, 2003

11. Value of Mangrove

Conservation


DENR Region 10

personnel

45 May 24-25, 2003

12. Officers Training

(Leadership Training)

ECOLINC, Inc. (AO) 22 10-Jun-03

13. Team Building ECOLINC, Inc. (AO) 22 8-Mar-03

14. Crab Fattening ECOLINC, Inc. (AO) and

DENR Region 10

personnel

22 26-May-03

15. CBFMP

Re-Orientation


DENR Region 10

personnel

31 28-May-03

16. Mangrove

Conservation and

Protection


Resource person from

Rizal Memorial State

College

25 June 8, 2003

34

FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT

LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Year

Planted Component Species Planted

Area Planted

(hectares) Survival Rate

2001

REFO

Bacauan Babae/lalake

400.95

83%

2002

REFO


149.05

85%

2003*

REFO


550.00

90%

TOTAL 550.00 90.39%

Note: * Maintenance & Protection Activities

35


LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTS

ITEM Specifications Qty Date/year

procured Cost (PhP)

1. Boat / Banca 1-small,

2- medium size

3 Year 2002 374,000.00

2. Motorcycle Honda MC, XL 125 Year 2002 252,825.84

3. Steel Cabinets Steel Cabinets 4 Year 2002 18,214.00

4. Computer HP Brio PC Intel

Pentium III 733

mhg

1 February 2, 2001 70,850.00

5. Printer HP DeskJet Model

849 C

1 April 27, 2001 5,811.52

6. UPS Gamatronic Compact

model 520VA

1 April 15, 2001 5,720.00

7. GIS Maptitude Comb. Of Software

& Geographic Data

1 March 28, 2001 44,460.00

8. GPS Global Positioning

Power

1 March 28, 2001 105,000.00

9. Handheld Radio VHF/FM COM model

IC-F3GT

2 January 12, 2001 29,933.28

10. Base Radio VHF/FM ICOM 1 Year 2002 64,789.92

11. Forester's Transit Surveying Compass,

Ushikita, model

S-27

2 May 21, 2001 65,680.00

12. Manual Typewriter Olivetti, 18 carriage 1 March 28, 2001 8,309.60

13. Brunton Compass Kataoka br., model

BCD-90

4 March 28, 2001 19,552.00

14. Steel Nylon Tape Tajima br. 1 April 23, 2001 2,700.00

15. Diameter Tape 2 March 29, 2001 1,330.00

16. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 October 26, 2001 7,800.00

17. Abney Hand Level Model: OSK 17251 4 May 21, 2001 9,568.00

18. Rain Gauge Digital Rainwise 1 May 28, 2001 6,300.00

19. Binocular 3 Year 2002 12,168.00

20. Lettering Set Leroy set 1 Year 2002 4,992.00

36


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO

TRAININGS TRAINORS

NO. OF

PARTICI-

PANTS

INCLUSIVE

DATES

1. Orientation Seminar on

Mangrove Subproject

Implementation under FSP

NFDO, FSP-TA,

and RFDO

9 August 16-17, 2000

2. FSP Mangrove Action

Planning Workshop

NFDO, FSP-TA,

and RFDO

9 December 7-9,

2000

3. Workshop on the

Implementation of Capital

Build-up System for

Community-Based Forest

Management Project

DENR-R9,

Technical

Personnel

9 December 14, 2000

4. FSP Year-end Physical and

Financial Reconciliation

Workshop for CY 2001

Planning Workshop

NFDO, FSP-TA,

and RFDO

9 December 15-17,

2000

5. FSP Mid-Year Physical and

Financial Assessment and

Action Planning Workshop

NFDO, FSP-TA,

and RFDO

9 June 26-28, 2001

6. Hands-on Training on the

Application of Global

Positioning System (GPS)

NFDO, FSP-TA,

and RFDO

9 April 2-4, 2002

7. Re-orientation Course of

Project Implementors of

Mangrove Subproject

Sites

NFDO and FSP-

TA

9 April 19-22, 2002

8. FSP Phase-out/ Phase-in

Planning Workshop

NFDO and FSP-

TA

9 December 10-13,

2002

37


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5a. Cocoland Farming LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Cocoland Farming

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc.

No. of Beneficiaries : 426

Amount of investment : PHp 380,000.00

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : Sep. 12, 2003

Status : On-going

Net Income : Php 11, 200.00

CFDF : Php 700,000.00

Linkages Developed : N/A

38


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5b.Crab Fattening LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Crab Fattening



Amount of investment : Php 12,961.00

Date of Feasibility Study : Nov-02

Date started : May-03

Status : On-going

Net Income : Php 800.00

CFDF : Php 700,000.00

Linkages Developed : BFAR

39


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5c. Photo Copying LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Photo Copying Machine





Date started : Sept. 8, 2003

Status : On-going

Net Income : Php 1,920.00

CFDF : Php 700,000.00


40


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5d. Mud Boat Fishing LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Mud Boat Fishing





Date started : Jan. 24, 2003

Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00


41


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5e. Chain Saw Services LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Chain Saw Services

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (SMDA)




Date started : Mar. 13, 2003

Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00

Name of Livelihood Project : Chain Saw Services

42


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5f. Planer Services LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Planer Services

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (SMDA)




Date started : Mar. 15, 2003

Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00


43


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5g. Lending LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Lending

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (BPORDM)




Date started : Jun-03

Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00


44


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5h. Lending LIVELIHOOD PROJECT


Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (DEDO)





Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00


45


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5i. Lending LIVELIHOOD PROJECT


Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (MMA)





Status : On-going

Net Income :

CFDF : Php 700,000.00


46


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5j. Sari-Sari Store LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Sari-Sari Store

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (CAFIMCO)





Status : On-going

Net Income :

CFDF : Php 700,000.00


47


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5k. Crab Fattening LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Crab Fattening

Implementor : RIFCOREM, Inc. (PUPLABI)





Status : On-going

Net Income :

CFDF : Php 700,000.00


48


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5l. Ricemill LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Ricemill





Date started : Jan. 21, 2004

Status : On-going


CFDF : Php 700,000.00


49


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 5m. Danggit & Bangus Culture LIVELIHOOD PROJECT

Name of Livelihood Project : Danggit and Bangus Culture




Date of Feasibility Study : Dec-01

Date started : Jan-03

Status : Cancelled

Net Income :

CFDF : Php 700,000.00

Linkages Developed : BFAR

50


LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 6. STATUS REPORT

Region

NAME/

LOCATION OF

THE

SUBPROJECT

PROJECT

AREA (ha)

PROJECT

COST

(Mil peso)

STATUS OF PROGRESS

(O:on going C: Completion)

SMP CO CSD M &

E INFRA

9 & 10

RIZAL Mangrove

Rehabilitation

Subproject

(Sebaca, Rizal,

Zamboanga Del

Norte)

550.00 10,375,056.37 C C C C C

51


LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 7. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING Cost Estimate By Activity

ACTIVITIES TARGET UNIT of

MEASURE

UNIT

COST

TOTAL COST

1. Social Investigation

43,000.00

2. Information and

Education Campaign

67,000.00

3. Documentation

Process

4. Identification of

Possible CBFMA

51,000.00

5. Organizing

Activities

94,000.00

6. Community

Activities

172,095.00

7. PMC 231,905.00

TOTAL 659,000.00

52


LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 8. Cost Estimate for REFORESTATION Per Activity

ACTIVITY Unit Of

Measure

TARGET

OUTPUT

UNIT

COST TOTAL COST

I. SEEDLING PRODUCTION

1. Procurement of Planting

Materials

a. Gathering has 550 2,502.50 1,376,372.69

b. Handling has 550 325.00 178,749.80

Sub-total 1,555,122.49

II. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT 48,675.40

1. Site preparation has 550 791.96 435,578.75

2. Alignment/Staking has 550 526.11 289,362.50

3. Hauling of Propagules has 550 102.27 56,250.00

4. Planting has 550 1,199.89 659,940.00

5.Survey, Delineation and

Mapping

has 550 610.49 335,770.00

Sub-total 1,825,576.65

III. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION

1. Clearing and Removal of

Debris

Year 1 - 2 passes has 550 436.36 240,000.00

Year 2 - 4 passes has 550 2,323.42 1,277,880.00

Year 3 - 1 passes has 550 1,084.00 596,200.00

2. Replanting has 550 356.52 196,085.50

3. Patrol/Inspection has 550 390.29 214,659.30

4. Tools and materials has 550 58.42 32,130.90

Sub-total 2,524,824.80

IV. INFRASTRUCTURE

1. Bunkhouse units 550 314.55 173,000.00

2. Look-out Tower units 550 47.27 26,000.00

3. Office units 550 327.27 180,000.00

Sub-total 379,000.00

VI. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

1. First Year has 550 413.81 227,597.73

2. Second Year has 550 789.61 434,286.84

3. Third Year has 550 300.61 165,334.43

Sub-total 827,219.00

G R A N D T O T A L has 550.00 12,930.44 7,111,742.94

53


LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Table 9. MONITORING & EVALUATION Cost Estimate Per Activity

ACTIVITIES Target

Output

Unit of

Measure Unit Cost Total Cost

PHYSICAL VALIDATION

1. Verification of boundaries,

UTM Monuments and Block

Corner Post

550 has 38.64 21,250.00

2. Seedling Production

Inventory/ Analysis

550 has 30.91 17,000.00

3. Survival Counting with 20%

Sampling Intensity including

mapping of developed areas

550 has 359.23 197,575.00

4. Height and Diameter

Measurement, Assessment of

Overall Health Appearance

550 has 46.36 25,500.00

5. Physical Inspection of

Infrastructure

550 has 61.82 34,000.00

6. Project Management Cost and

Report Preparation

550 has 96.05 52,825.00

SUBTOTAL 348,150.00

INSTITUTIONAL VALIDATION

1. Preliminary Activities

a. Courtesy Calls and Pre-

Assessment

3 Meetings 7,000.00 21,000.00

b. Data Collection and

Preliminary Assessment

b.1 Secondary Data

Gathering

1 Subproject 15,000.00 15,000.00

b.2 Primary Data Gathering 11 Barangays 8,000.00 88,000.00

c. Preparation and

Presentation of Draft

Report

1 Report 20,000.00 20,000.00

d. Preparation and

Submission of Final

Report

1 Report 15,000.00 15,000.00

2. Project Management Cost 1 Subproject 56,000.00 56,000.00

SUBTOTAL 215,000.00

GRANDTOTAL 550 has 1,023.91 563,150.00

54


Loan No. Ph-P 135

Table 10. Road Rehabilitation INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

Infrastructure Project : Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road

Location : Suitio Tahica, Sebaca, Rizal, Zamboanga

del Norte

Contractor : JEADA Construction

Contract Cost : Php 2, 041,163.43

Contract Duration : 6 months

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : November 29, 2002

Expected Completion Date : May 15, 2003

Revised Completion Date : Extended up to November 2003

Date of MOA with LGU : Not yet turn-over to the LGU

(After Election)

Brief description : The infrastructure project of Rizal is the

Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road

situated at Sitio-Tahica, Sebaca, Rizal with

a total contract cost of Php 2, 195, 000.00.

The Notice to Proceed was awarded to

JEADA Construction last November 2002

and supposedly it will end on May 15, 2003,

but due to negative slippage brought about

by unconditional weather, it was further

extended up to November 21, 2003 to

complete the project. By now, it was not

yet turn over to LGU-RIzal, but it is

tentatively schedule to be turned-over

after the election (May 2004).


Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 19,465.56 10,706,055.37 18,863.74 10,375,056.37

A. SMP

B. CO 1,800.00 989,999.00 1,198.18 659,000.00 550.00 345,500.00 550.00 79,500.00

1. Old Sites

- Year 1

- Year 2

2. New Sites 1,800.00 989,999.00 1,198.18 659,000.00 550.00 345,500.00 550.00 79,500.00

- Year 1 628.18 345,500.00 144.55 79,500.00 550.00 345,500.00 550.00 79,500.00

- Year 2 1,171.82 644,499.00 1,053.64 579,500.00

C. CSD 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 550.00 2,335,340.37 400.95 2,335,340.34

1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping

2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC

a. Infrastructure

b. Trails and footpath

c. Plantation

c.1. Riverbank Protection

3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 550.00 2,335,340.37 400.95 2,335,340.34

a. Agroforestry

b. Assisted Natural Regeneration

c. Enrichment Planting

d. Tree Plantation 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 - - - - 550.00 2,335,340.37 400.95 2,335,340.34

d.1. Bamboo

d.1. Bamboo

d.2. Riverbank Protection

d.2. Rattan

d.3. Mangrove 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 12,930.44 7,111,742.94 550.00 2,335,340.37 400.95 2,335,340.34

d.4. Plantation Species

e. Timber Stand Improvement

4. Inventory Residual Forest

5. Income Enhancement Project

D. Infrastructure Component 2,041,163.43 2,041,163.43

E. Monitoring & Evaluation 1,023.91 563,150.00 1,023.91 563,150.00

- Year 1

- Year 2

2. SUSIMO 2,395,780.00 2,395,780.00 328,000.00 328,000.00 843,000.00 843,000.00

Equipment provided to the Office

Researches conducted

Trainings

GRAND TOTAL 23,821.52 13,101,835.37 23,219.70 12,770,836.37 328,000.00 328,000.00 3,523,840.37 3,257,840.34

ACTIVITIESPlanned Actual

2000

Planned Actual Planned Actual

2001


Loan No. PH-P135

TABLE 11. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM

A. SMP

B. CO

1. Old Sites

- Year 1

- Year 2

2. New Sites

- Year 1

- Year 2

C. CSD

1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping

2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC

a. Infrastructure

b. Trails and footpath

c. Plantation

c.1. Riverbank Protection

3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment)

a. Agroforestry

b. Assisted Natural Regeneration

c. Enrichment Planting

d. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bamboo

d.1. Bamboo

d.2. Riverbank Protection

d.2. Rattan

d.3. Mangrove

d.4. Plantation Species

e. Timber Stand Improvement

4. Inventory Residual Forest

5. Income Enhancement Project

D. Infrastructure Component

E. Monitoring & Evaluation

- Year 1

- Year 2

2. SUSIMO

Equipment provided to the Office

Researches conducted

Trainings

GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIES

Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

550.00 10,706,055.37 ### 10,375,056.37

550.00 244,000.00 - - 550.00 400,499.00 550.00 579,500.00 550.00 989,999.00 550.00 659,000.00

550.00 244,000.00 - - 550.00 400,499.00 550.00 579,500.00 550.00 989,999.00 550.00 659,000.00

550.00 345,500.00 550.00 79,500.00

550.00 244,000.00 550.00 400,499.00 550.00 579,500.00 550.00 644,499.00 550.00 579,500.00

550.00 2,028,800.08 550.00 3,550,958.24 550.00 2,747,602.49 550.00 1,225,444.36 550.00 7,111,742.94 550.00 7,111,742.94

-

550.00 2,028,800.08 550.00 3,550,958.24 550.00 2,747,602.49 550.00 1,225,444.36 550.00 7,111,742.94 550.00 7,111,742.94

-

550.00 2,028,800.08 550.00 3,550,958.24 550.00 2,747,602.49 550.00 1,225,444.36 550.00 7,111,742.94 550.00 7,111,742.94

550.00 2,028,800.08 550.00 3,550,958.24 550.00 2,747,602.49 550.00 1,225,444.36 550.00 7,111,742.94 550.00 7,111,742.94

0.80 2,041,163.43 0.80 2,041,163.43 0.80 2,041,163.43 0.80 2,041,163.43

550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00

550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00 550.00 563,150.00

531,000.00 531,000.00 693,780.00 693,780.00 2,395,780.00 2,395,780.00

2,803,800.08 4,081,958.24 6,446,194.92 5,103,037.79 550.00 13,101,835.37 ### 12,770,836.37

2002 2003Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL)

Planned Actual Planned Actual

57

Annex 1a-1

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Grassroots Linkages for Environmental

Action Network, Inc.(GLEAN)

(CO Contractor)

PROJECT MANAGER

Assistant Project Manager

Secretary

Bookkeeper

C.O. Supervisor

C.O. Worker C.O. Worker

Treasurer

Cashier

58

Annex 1a-2


Environmental Cooperation and Linkages, Inc. (ECOLINK, Inc.) (CO Contractor-Replacement)

Board of Directors

President

Board Secretary

Board Treasurer

Internal Auditor

Administrative

Staff

Executive

Secretary

RESEARCH

IEC

EVALUATION

CO

LIVELIHOOD

NETWORKING

LINKAGES

SPECIAL

CONCERNS

59

Annex 1b


Rizal Federation for Coastal Resource Management (RIFCOREM) (PO Contractor)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EXECUTIVE BODY

ADMINISTRATIVE

STAFF

Bookkeepers

PO Forester

COMMITTEES

Survey &

Delineation

Com.

Finance

Com.

Plantation

Com.

Grievance &

Conflict

Resolution

Com.

Propagules Quality

Control Com.

60

Annex 1c


Gamut Ug Salingsing Sa Bohol, Inc. (GASALBO, Inc.) (M&E Contractor)

Operation Manager

Assistant Operation

Manager

Secretary

Auditor Treasurer

Project

Identification

and Selection

Unit

Organizing

Unit

Project

Supervision

Unit

Project

Monitoring

Unit

Office Staff

61

Annex 1d


JEADA Constructions, Inc. (Infra Contractor)

PROJECT MANAGER

EQUIPMENT

SUPERVISOR

Quality

Control/Materials

Engineer

Project Safety

Engineer

Administrative

Officer Surveyor

Chief Mechanic

Construction

Foreman

Skilled/Semi-Skilled

Laborers/ Helpers

62

Annex 1e


SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE

(SUSIMO)

VBU-HEAD SDMU-HEAD

ASU-HEAD COSU-HEAD

ASU-STAFF COSU-STAFF

Subproject Management Officer

63

Close up of planted Bakawan at barangay Misom, Baliangao,

Misamis Occidental

POs conducting regular boat and foot patrol as one of the

activities for maintenance & protection of plantation.

POs doing fishnets for fish pens which is one of their livelihood

projects.

64

Mangrove plantation established by RIFCOREM at barangay Casul,

Sapang Dalaga, Misamis Occidental

A portion of Mangrove plantation located in Rizal Mangrove

Subproject

Portion of Rizal Mangrove Rehabilitation Subproject in barangay Misom,

Baliangao, Misamis Occidental

65

Mangrove plantation established by RIFCOREM at barangay Balubuhan,

Rizal, Zamboanga del Norte

Subproject Site Management Office of Rizal

Mangrove Subproject

Finished Farm-To-Market Road Infrastructure Project

in Rizal Mangrove Subproject

Parcel 1

Corner DISTANCE (meter)

1-2 N 13 ° 35 ' E 599.59

2-3 S 58 ° 27 ' E 1,119.69

3-4 S 76 ° 46 ' E 559.05

4-5 S 33 ° 52 ' W 1,091.35

5-6 N 54 ° 10 ' W 497.58

6-7 N 26 ° 16 ' W 267.75

7-1 N 45 ° 11 ' W 717.65

Reference point:

Corner 1:long-X 123 29 ' 52 "lat-Y 8 39 ' 32 "

Parcel 2


1-2 N 11 ° 37 ' W 509.83

2-3 S 83 ° 23 ' E 788.74

3-4 S 29 ° 42 ' E 332.69

4-5 N 65 ° 37 ' E 561.26

5-6 S 75 ° 1 ' E 489.75

6-7 N 55 ° 38 ' E 338.50

7-8 S 32 ° 60 ' E 57.11

8-9 S 60 ° 33 ' W 126.10

9-10 S 24 ° 30 ' W 414.84

10-11 S 90 ° 0 ' W 83.60

11-12 N 26 ° 10 ' W 157.11

12-13 N 75 ° 8 ' W 158.20

13-14 N 37 ° 15 ' W 75.00

14-15 S 53 ° 8 ' W 119.36

15-16 N 47 ° 1 ' W 146.96

16-17 S 44 ° 9 ' W 624.16

17-18 S 16 ° 54 ' W 136.50

18-19 S 85 ° 23 ' W 214.60

19-20 N 16 ° 20 ' W 109.52

20-21 N 5 ° 35 ' E 320.22

RIZAL MANGROVE REHABILITATION

SUBPROJECT

BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

21-22 S 76 ° 20 ' W 182.05

22-23 N 16 ° 31 ' W 92.20

23-24 N 17 ° 36 ' E 212.97

24-25 N 29 ° 20 ' W 87.76

25-26 N 14 ° 9 ' W 684.15

26-27 S 8 ° 30 ' W 808.56

27-28 S 0 ° 0 ' W 207.70

28-1 S 87 ° 11 ' W 148.38

Reference point:


Parcel 3


1-2 N 65 ° 21 ' E 126.09

2-3 S 35 ° 42 ' E 376.60

3-4 S 9 ° 1 ' W 396.59

4-5 S 37 ° 24 ' W 306.75

5-6 S 62 ° 48 ' E 134.13

6-7 N 58 ° 1 ' E 65.90

7-8 S 63 ° 44 ' E 122.90

8-9 S 90 ° 0 ' E 136.90

9-10 S 16 ° 51 ' E 129.77

10-11 S 59 ° 57 ' W 217.66

11-12 S 75 ° 27 ' W 222.12

12-13 S 17 ° 5 ' W 185.49

13-14 N 46 ° 49 ' W 310.79

14-15 N 10 ° 4 ' W 150.42

15-16 N 15 ° 48 ' E 131.47

16-17 N 31 ° 19 ' E 206.97

17-18 N 50 ° 21 ' E 217.18

18-19 N 17 ° 17 ' E 297.63

19-20 N 65 ° 44 ' W 104.87

20-21 N 18 ° 4 ' W 130.64

21-22 N 57 ° 26 ' E 31.21

22-1 N 37 ° 3 ' W 206.34

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Reference point:


Parcel 4


1-2 N 0 ° 54 ' W 126.62

2-3 N 60 ° 48 ' W 102.30

3-4 N 34 ° 13 ' W 619.68

4-5 N 3 ° 34 ' W 135.06

5-6 N 49 ° 9 ' E 263.31

6-7 S 51 ° 52 ' E 540.79

7-8 S 32 ° 10 ' E 350.50

8-9 S 10 ° 24 ' E 367.14

9-10 S 73 ° 18 ' W 194.82

10-1 N 77 ° 57 ' W 248.17

Reference point:


BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 5


1-2 N 45 ° 21 ' W 242.05

2-3 N 1 ° 40 ' W 141.16

3-4 S 76 ° 42 ' E 505.24

4-5 N 60 ° 30 ' E 236.13

5-6 N 4 ° 35 ' W 104.03

6-7 N 25 ° 25 ' E 91.79

7-8 S 60 ° 38 ' E 114.18

8-9 S 8 ° 47 ' E 81.86

9-10 S 67 ° 51 ' E 120.93

10-11 S 28 ° 56 ' E 137.46

11-12 S 46 ° 21 ' W 186.44

12-13 S 62 ° 6 ' W 119.71

13-1 S 89 ° 1 ' W 601.89

Reference point:


BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 6


1-2 N 53 ° 33 ' W 326.71

2-3 N 18 ° 45 ' W 123.77

3-4 N 18 ° 11 ' E 238.31

4-5 N 23 ° 21 ' E 261.72

5-6 S 9 ° 6 ' E 787.90

6-7 N 45 ° 0 ' E 154.01

7-8 N 33 ° 7 ' E 142.43

8-9 S 23 ° 28 ' W 186.54

9-10 S 24 ° 6 ' W 359.89

10-11 S 53 ° 31 ' E 264.55

11-12 N 56 ° 10 ' E 214.28

12-13 S 41 ° 14 ' E 149.45

13-14 S 7 ° 14 ' W 259.57

14-15 S 78 ° 28 ' W 259.54

15-1 S 89 ° 57 ' W 101.90

Reference point:


Parcel 7


1-2 N 31 ° 50 ' E 540.23

2-3 N 25 ° 42 ' E 385.23

3-4 N 50 ° 52 ' E 225.98

4-5 S 64 ° 54 ' E 107.99

5-6 S 40 ° 45 ' W 196.83

6-7 S 3 ° 46 ' E 244.03

7-8 S 33 ° 51 ' W 228.40

8-9 S 38 ° 35 ' W 420.89

9-1 N 87 ° 51 ' W 223.06

Reference point:


BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 8


1-2 N 33 ° 31 ' E 353.35

2-3 S 66 ° 29 ' E 62.38

3-4 S 32 ° 44 ' W 356.97

4-1 N 62 ° 42 ' W 66.73

Reference point:


Parcel 9


1-2 S 60 ° 8 ' E 61.46

2-3 S 29 ° 26 ' W 364.44

3-4 N 73 ° 22 ' W 53.44

4-5 N 23 ° 10 ' E 180.01

5-1 N 32 ° 25 ' E 198.08

Reference point:


Parcel 10


1-2 N 1 ° 6 ' W 236.04

2-3 N 2 ° 30 ' E 285.77

3-4 N 87 ° 19 ' E 76.68

4-5 S 0 ° 15 ' W 521.50

5-1 S 87 ° 30 ' W 82.48

Reference point:


BEARING

BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 11


1-2 S 78 ° 3 ' E 167.02

2-3 S 33 ° 10 ' E 127.59

3-4 S 2 ° 54 ' E 442.17

4-5 S 44 ° 48 ' W 99.07

5-6 S 81 ° 1 ' W 216.36

6-7 N 21 ° 34 ' W 170.01

7-8 N 0 ° 21 ' E 350.31

8-1 N 26 ° 18 ' E 199.33

Reference point:


Parcel 12


1-2 N 38 ° 48 ' E 348.74

2-3 S 60 ° 31 ' E 298.10

3-4 S 72 ° 35 ' E 316.94

4-5 S 22 ° 43 ' W 566.24

5-1 N 48 ° 47 ' W 746.77

Reference point:


Parcel 13


1-2 N 28 ° 57 ' E 81.60

2-3 S 66 ° 2 ' E 305.54

3-4 S 19 ° 14 ' W 78.91

4-1 N 66 ° 31 ' W 319.14

Reference point:


BEARING

BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 14


1-2 N 54 ° 26 ' E 200.27

2-3 N 31 ° 41 ' W 129.85

3-4 N 50 ° 36 ' E 188.92

4-5 S 29 ° 49 ' E 123.68

5-6 S 50 ° 22 ' W 86.22

6-7 S 31 ° 27 ' E 137.26

7-8 S 57 ° 60 ' W 164.73

8-1 N 83 ° 16 ' W 168.86

Reference point:


Parcel 15


1-2 N 35 ° 47 ' E 383.61

2-3 S 67 ° 59 ' E 478.95

3-4 S 41 ° 31 ' W 454.31

4-1 N 60 ° 24 ' W 422.31

Reference point:


BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 16


1-2 N 47 ° 19 ' E 401.40

2-3 N 27 ° 59 ' E 293.73

3-4 S 63 ° 0 ' E 71.82

4-5 S 25 ° 4 ' W 440.48

5-6 S 50 ° 4 ' W 181.66

6-7 S 69 ° 6 ' W 135.72

7-1 N 34 ° 10 ' W 78.69

Reference point:


Parcel 17


1-2 N 34 ° 32 ' E 389.66

2-3 S 63 ° 58 ' E 460.83

3-4 S 18 ° 33 ' W 458.75

4-5 N 47 ° 22 ' W 317.27

5-6 S 62 ° 47 ' W 70.84

6-7 N 31 ° 52 ' W 84.30

7-8 S 56 ° 20 ' W 75.94

8-1 N 39 ° 12 ' W 134.33

Reference point:


BEARING

BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 18


1-2 N 25 ° 20 ' W 280.47

2-3 N 2 ° 42 ' W 91.10

3-4 N 41 ° 14 ' W 190.27

4-5 N 21 ° 1 ' W 365.61

5-6 N 1 ° 10 ' W 350.77

6-7 S 25 ° 5 ' E 703.48

7-8 S 89 ° 1 ' E 432.16

8-9 S 26 ° 31 ' E 207.19

9-1 S 51 ° 12 ' W 558.14

Reference point:


BEARING


SUBPROJECT

Parcel 19


1-2 N 30 ° 9 ' W 453.25

2-3 N 4 ° 42 ' W 188.23

3-4 N 32 ° 16 ' E 313.17

4-5 N 5 ° 24 ' W 520.01

5-6 N 45 ° 37 ' W 264.19

6-7 N 44 ° 29 ' E 235.33

7-8 N 69 ° 4 ' E 170.67

8-9 S 12 ° 53 ' E 361.72

9-10 S 0 ° 37 ' E 252.41

10-11 S 44 ° 19 ' E 217.45

11-12 N 75 ° 34 ' E 154.47

12-13 N 17 ° 31 ' E 203.33

13-14 S 88 ° 40 ' E 150.24

14-15 S 9 ° 37 ' E 512.01

15-16 S 61 ° 57 ' W 424.68

16-17 N 54 ° 56 ' W 225.77

17-18 S 36 ° 4 ' W 223.54

18-19 S 18 ° 51 ' E 459.24

19-1 S 70 ° 12 ' W 159.11

Reference point:


BEARING

This Subproject Completed Report was produced by the

National Forestation Development Office (NFDO)

through the valuable assistance and contribution from the

DENR, Region IX

PENRO, Dipolog

CENRO, Dapitan

and staff of the

Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO)-RIZAL

ao assisting organization -...

Documents