antimicrobial prophylaxis

18
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux Members of the writing group (Alejandro Hoberman, M.D et al published on May 4, 2014, at NEJM.org.

Upload: georgemar-arana

Post on 14-Dec-2015

245 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

antimicrobial prophylaxis

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Antimicrobial Prophylaxisfor Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux

Members of the writing group (Alejandro

Hoberman, M.D et al

published on May 4, 2014,

at NEJM.org.

Page 2: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Background

• Children with febrile urinary tract infection commonly have vesicoureteral reflux.

• Because trial results have been limited and inconsistent, the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent recurrences in children with reflux remains controversial.

Page 3: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objectives

• To determine whether long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis is • effective in preventing febrile or

symptomatic recurrences• Reducing the likelihood of renal

scarring• To determine the extent to which it

contributes to bacterial resistance

Page 4: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Methods

• Study design: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial

• Duration: 2 years• Screened and enrolled children

between June 2007 and May 2011• Population: 607 children with

vesicoureteral reflux• Setting: 19 clinical sites across the United

States

Page 5: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Inclusion Criteria:• 2 to 71 months of age• Had Grade I to IV vesicoureteral reflux

• Exclusion Criteria:• Index infection occurred more than 112

days before randomiation• Children with coexisting urologic

anomalies• Contraindications for the use of TMP-

SMX

Page 6: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Urine specimen collection:• Catheterization or suprapubic aspiration

– not toilet trained children• Clean Voided specimens

• Extent of renal cortical defects• Assessed semiquantitatively by dividing

the cortex into 12 segments and determined severity on the basis of the number o segments affected

Page 7: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Baseline• Rectal swabs were tested for resistance

of E. coli isolates to TMP-SMX

Page 8: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 9: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 10: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 11: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 12: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

RESULTS

Page 13: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 14: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 15: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Recurrent urinary tract infection developed in 39 of 302 children who received prophylaxis as compared with 72 of 305 children who received placebo (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.78).

• Prophylaxis reduced the risk of recurrences by 50% (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.74) and was particularly effective in children whose index infection was febrile (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.64) and in those with baseline bladder and bowel dysfunction (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.58).

Page 16: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• The occurrence of renal scarring did not differ

• Among 87 children with a first recurrence caused by Escherichia coli, the proportion of isolates that were resistant to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was• 63% in the prophylaxis group • 19% in the placebo group.

Page 17: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Summary• What: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux• Where: 19 clinical sites across the United States• When: Screened and enrolled children between

June 2007 and May 2011• Why:

• To determine whether long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis • Effective in preventing febrile or symptomatic

recurrences• Reducing the likelihood of renal scarring

• To determine the extent to which it contributes to bacterial resistance

• How: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Page 18: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Take Home Message

Among children with vesicoureteral reflux after urinary

tract infection, antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with

substantially reduced risk of recurrence but not of renal

scarring.