anti parkinsons drugs evaluation

66
1 PRECLINICAL STUDY OF ANTI -PARKINSONIAN DRUGS Presented by: SANDIP CHAUDHARI M. PHARM (1 St SEM) Department of Pharmacology

Upload: sandip-chaudhari

Post on 15-Jan-2017

137 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

1

PRECLINICAL STUDY OF ANTI -PARKINSONIAN DRUGS

Presented by: SANDIP CHAUDHARIM. PHARM (1St SEM)

Department of Pharmacology

Page 2: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

2

Contents

Introduction

Etiology Pathophysiology Classification Mechanism of action

In vivo preclinical evaluation

In vitro preclinical evaluation

Page 3: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

3

Introduction (Rang & Dale,2002, Richard ,A.H. 2000)

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder characterised by progressive loss of dopaminergic neuron in substantia nigra and depletion of the neurotransmitter Dopamine in the striatum. image

Features Hypokinetic movement Akinetic- Difficulty in initiating movements & decreased

spontaneous movements. Bradykinesia – Slowness of movement.

Decreased associated movements- Expressionless face or mask face.

Page 4: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

4

Hyperkinetic movements Rigidity – The limbs offer resistance to passive bending

throughout the movement. Tremor – Observed only at rest. Festinant gait- Trying to catch the center of gravity.

Page 5: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

5

Famous Faces of Parkinson

Michael J. Fox Muhammad Ali Katharine Hepburn

Pope John Paul II Johnny CashMao Tse Tung

Page 6: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

6

Etiology(Tripathi,2004)

Idiopathic Drugs MPTP Genetic

Page 7: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

7

Pathophysiology (Goodmann & Gilmann,1996)

Page 8: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

DA

ACH

PD due to DA

PD due to ACH

Levodopa Inhibitory

ExcitatoryCentral anti cholinergics drugs

8

(Frongois, W. et.al. 2003)

Page 9: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

9

Page 10: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

10

Classification: (Tripathi K.D,2004)

Dopamine analogues: Levodopa

Peripheral deoxy decarboxylase inhibitor: Carbidopa, benserazide

COMT- inhibitors: Tolcapone, Entacapone

MAO-B inhibitors: Selegiline, Clorgyline

Dopamine agonists: Rosipirole , Pergolide

Central anti- cholinergics: Benzotropine ,biperiden

Page 11: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

11

Page 12: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

IN VIVO MODEL MPTP model in animals

A. MPTP model in mice

B. MPTP model in monkey

Circling behavior test

Elevation body swing test

Reserpine antagonism

Tremorine & Oxatremorine antagonism

Specific test for evaluating locomotor activity

A. Skilled paw reaching test

B. Stepping test C. Gait Analysis12

Page 13: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Principle: MPTP acts as- a neurotoxin which preferentially affected

dopaminergic cells in substantia nigra par compacta .

MPTP shows toxicity due to conversion into MPP+ by MAO enzyme.

This ion acts by inhibiting the ET system of mitochondrial complex -1.

Most popular MPTP model : 1. MPTP model in mice. 2.MPTP model in monkey.

13

MPTP Model in animal (Von Bohlen,2006)

Page 14: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

MPTP model in monkey s(Vogel, H .G. et al 2002)

Principle:

N-MPTP

14

Partial damage to basal ganglia

PD like symptom

DA precursor L-dopa

Reversed

leads to

i.v.

Page 15: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements :

Animal - Rhesus monkey (5-8 kg).

Drug - N-MPTP up to 10-18 mg/kg i.v. for 5-8 days. Test drug

15

Page 16: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure:

Take 8 rhesus monkey (5-8 kg) of either sex

Administered the N-MPTP i.v. with cumulative dose up to 10-18 mg/kg for 5-8 days.

Produces PD like symptoms

Administered test drug

Symptoms are Evaluated

16

Page 17: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation :

The severity is rated by using scale of 0 (normal ) to 17 (max)

Observation Scoring(1) Movement Normal Reduced Sleepy

01 2

(2) Checking movement Present Reduced Absent

01

2

17

Page 18: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Observation Scoring(3) Attention& blinking Normal Abnormal

0 1

(4) Balance & co-ordination Normal Impaired Unstable Falls

0 1 2 3

(5) Vocalization Normal Reduced Absent

0 1 2

18

Page 19: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

MPTP model in mice (Wei, Zhang, et.al,2004)

Principle:

Neuro protective effect of test drug measured in MPTP model in mice.

SN area is especially rich in microglia activation release a variety of neurotoxic factors like superoxide, NO, cytokines & eicosanoids.

Test drug reduces NADPH oxidase activity at extracellular & intracellular level.

19

Page 20: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements:

Animal - mice-wild strain (C57BL/6J). mice-null strain.

Drug - MPTP (15mg free base/kg) s.c. & test drug

20

Page 21: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure:

Take NADPH - Oxidase null & wild type mice

MPTP (15mg/kg) injected s.c. to mice daily for

6-consecutive days

Then test druginjected to mice twice daily for

first 6-days& then inject once daily for remainder study

After 6-days of last MPTP injection, mice are killed

21

Page 22: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Striatal tissue are rapidly dissected

22

Striatal cell viabilityestimation

NO release estimate by assays

ROS estimate byFluorescence assays

Page 23: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation: Test drug evaluated for showing neuro protective action .

Reducing NADPH Oxidase activity in PHOX+/+ (wild strain)

is present but in PHOX-/-, NADPH Oxidase are absent .

Reduces MPTP induced production of superoxide free

radicals extracellular level& intracellular ROS.

23

Page 24: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Circling Behavior in rats (Bracha, H.S., et.al, 1986)

Principle :

An imbalance of dopaminergic activity within the basal

ganglia is associated with markedly asymmetric

circling behavior (Rotation turning) which measured by

Rota meter.

This model is used in drug induced rotating behavior

and understanding of extra pyramidal disorder & of

their treatment by dopaminergic agents.24

Page 25: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements:

Animal - Sprague-Dawely rats(150-175gm)

Dose - 6-OHDA(8µg in 4µl of 0.2mg/ml ascorbic acid in saline ) & test drug

Apparatus – Rotameter

(www. harvardapparatus.com)

25

Page 26: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure: Female Sprague Drawley rats are taken Rats are anesthetized with Pentobarbital

(60mg/kg)

Head is placed in stereotaxic device (www.supertech.com)

Stereotaxically lesioned in left substantia nigra (www.jove.com)

6-OHDA are injected into left SNr of rats

26

Page 27: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

L-desipramine.HCl (25mg/kg) are injected 30 min.

prior to 6-OHDA injected.

Rats are divided into groups:

Control groups for base value of ipsilateral rotation -

2.5mg/kg of d-amphetamine injected i.p. to rats.

Control groups for base value of contra lateral

rotation- 1mg/kg of Apomorphine injected i.p. to

rats.

27

Page 28: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Further studied test group as compared to control group.

No. of full turns( either ipsilateral Or contra lateral turning to

lesion) are recorded an automatic print out counter every 15

min. for one or two hr. session.

28

Page 29: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Observation :-For ipsi-lateral turning :

- administer 2.5 mg/kg Amphetamine &placed in circling chamber for 2 hour

For contra-lateral turning :- administer 1mg/kg & placed in

circling chamber for 1hour

Test compound are given i.p. or s.c. & record reading with 15 min. interval.

Evaluation :-% change of drug turns from control turns is recorded.

29

Page 30: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Elevation body swing test (Cesanov, B;1995)

Principle:

EBST measures asymmetrical motor behavior of hemiparkinsonian animals in a drug free state & drug induced state.

Drug induced motor behavior widely used as-behavioral index of hemi parkinsonian animals.

High positive co-relations b/w swing & Apomorphine induced rotational behavior.

30

Page 31: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements:

Animal - Sprague Dawley rats

Drug - 6-OHDA (8 mg in 4ml 0.9% saline containing

0.02% ascorbic acid).

Test drug

31

Page 32: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure: 40 rats are taken as test group Anesthetised with sod. Pentobarbital(60mg/kg i.p.) mounted in stereotaxic device

stereotaxically lesioned in left substantia nigra

6-OHDA solution are injected over 4min. & needle left in place for an additional 5 min. before retraction.

7 days after lesion, behavioral testing is performed .

Remaining 24 animal served as-control group. The animals are placed into a plexiglass box (40x40x35.5 cm.)

32

Page 33: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Sr. no. 15 sec 30 sec 45 sec 60 secLS RS LS RS LS RS LS RS

33

Observation : A swing is recorded whenever the animal moves its head out

of vertical axis. swing are counted for 60 sec. with interval of 15sec.

Page 34: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation:-

Σno. of swing towards left side % left swing = Σ L+R

Σno. of swing towards right side % right swing = Σ L+R

34

Page 35: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Reserpine antagonism (Salvador, H.L., et al, 1996)

Principle:

The ability of anti-cholinergic agents microinjected in subthalamic nucleus to reduce Reserpine induce muscular rigidity are assesed in rats.

Electro myographical activity of gastrocnemiussoleus muscle are used as- a parameter of muscular rigidity.

Reserpine increases high cholinergic tone in subthalamic nucleus result in increased muscular rigidity.

35

Page 36: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements:

Animal : male rats (Wistar strain 280-300 gm)

Drug – Chloral hydrate (350mg/kg i.p.)

Reserpine (5mg/kg i.p.)

Apparatus- photocell

36

Page 37: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure: male rats are taken

reserpine (5mg/kg i.p.) injected to rats

30min. Prior to observation test compound is injected

animals are placed singly on to floor of Perspex container (30x26x20 cm.) which situated on panlab proximally sensor unit.

Horizontal movement are recorded for 10min.

rearing & grooming episodes are registered

37

Page 38: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation :-

Locomotors activity & grooming scores of test group is

compared with control group.

Page 39: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Tremorine & Oxotremorine Antagonism (Parmar N.S,2000)

Principle:

Tremorine and Oxotremorine is a muscarinic receptor agonist, producing imbalance between the level of Ach & DA, so inducing a parkinsonism. Produces a sign like tremors, ataxia, salivation, lacrimation & hypothermia.

The signs are antagonized by test drug.

39

Page 40: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements

Animal- NMRI mice ( male) (18-22gm) Group- 2, each contain 6-10 mice

Drug- Test/ std , & tremorine or oxotremorine

Dose- 5 mg/kg of standard drug 0.5 mg/kg oxotremorine

Route- s.c. for oxotremorine

40

Page 41: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure-

6-10mice are taken

0.5mg/kg Oxotremorine s.c administered

After 1hr test drug were given orally

Tremor is scored after Oxotremorine dosage in 10 sec. observation

periods in every 15 min.

Salivation & Lacrimation are scored 15 & 30 min.

after Oxotremorine injection.

41

Page 42: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

SCORING:-

Tremors/ lacrimation Scoreabsent 0slight 1medium 2severe 3

video

42

Page 43: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation :-

1) Hyperthermia :-Average value of temp. in both group – comparedstatistically.

2) Tremor :-The score for all animals in each group. at the 3observation periods are summarized . The numbers in the treated groups. are expressed as% of the no. of the controlled group.

3) Salivation & lacrimation :-The course for both groups. are summarized at the 2observation periods & expressed as % of the no. of control group.

43

Page 44: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Skilled paw reaching test (Tracy, D.F., et.al., 2002)

Principle:

This method used to evaluate symptoms and treatment in rat by skilled reaching with fore paw for food.

Unilateral DA depletion reduces success by abnormalities in movements including changing in posture, shortened reaches and loss of pronation and spuniation.

44

Page 45: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

45

Page 46: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Requirements:-

Animal - long Evans rats (250-310gm)

Dose - Des methyl Imipramine (25 mg/kg i.p.)

6-OHDA (2μl of 4mg/ml in 0.95% saline with

0.02% ascorbic acid)

Equipment- Single pellet boxes (25x35x30cm)

Food tray boxes(10x18x10cm)

46

Page 47: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure:-

20 rats are taken

30minute before surgery, desmethylimipramine administered

(25mg/kg i.p.)

Rats anesthetized with pentabarbital(60mg/kg i.p.)

12 rats received 6-OHDA lesions but 8 rats not received

47

Page 48: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Scoring reaching success:-

Reaching performance are scored by counting misses and

successful reaches for each limb.

1. Scored as “reach”.

2. Scored as “hit”.

Success% = no. of reaches /no. of hit x100

48

Page 49: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Reaching posture

• Two point scale

• Scored as 0

• Scored as 1

49

Page 50: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Stepping Test in Rats (Olsson M. et. al,1995)

Principle:- This model is clinically relevant to unilateral model

for parkinsonism akinesia. The 6-OHDA lesion induced marked and long-

lasting impairments in the initiation of stepping movements with the contra lateral paw which can be ameliorated by application of drug.

Requirement:- Animal: Sprague Drawley rats Dose: 6-OHDA (3.6μg/μl in 0.2 μg/ml Ascorbate saline) test drug

50

Page 51: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure:- Rats were placed in a steriotaxic device 6-OHDA injected into the right ascending mesostriatal Experimental setup for stepping test.

Evaluation parameter:-Initiation time, Stepping Time, Step length.

51

Page 52: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Step length = Length of ramp / no. of steps

Sequence of testing in right paw & followed by left paw

testing, repeated twice.

52

Page 53: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Gait analysis (Nancy ,J.S. 2006)

(Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, et al. 1998)

Gait analysis is useful in objective assessment of

walking ability and identify causes for walking

abnormality in parkinsonism disease.

The result of gait analysis is useful in determining best

course of treatment.

Catwalk method is mostly used to analyze gait in lab.

Animal.

53

Page 54: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

54

Page 55: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Catwalk parameters- Regularity index Phase – lag Phase – lag variability Phase – lag mismatch %

Symmetrical gaits are divided into two groups- A. Lateral sequence ( LS) gaits B. Diagonal sequence(DS)gaits

55

Page 56: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Rotenone induced parkinsonism (Todd, b., et.al.,2002)

Principle:-

Chronic systemic complex 1st inhibition caused

by Rotenone exposure induces of parkinsonism in rats

including selective nigrostriatal dopanimergic

degeneration & formation of ubiquitin & α-synuclein

inclusion .

56

Page 57: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

57

Page 58: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Materials & Method:-

Cell culture – SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cell

Culture medium –minimum essential medium

Reagents –rotenone(5nm) prim. Abs & sec. Abs

Visualizing reagent -3,3-diaminobenzidine

Apparatus – bright field microscope

58

Page 59: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Procedure :

SK –N- MC neuroblastoma cells cultured in MEC medium containing rotenone

cells are incubated in prim. Abs for 24 hr.& followed by sec. Abs for 1hr

Added visualizing agent

Observed under bright field microscope.

59

Page 60: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Evaluation :

After 4 weeks, chronic rotenone exposure leads to –

Synuclein & Ubiquitin level increased

Reduced glutathione level.

Caused oxidative protein damage.

Caused oxidative DNA damage.

Increased apoptotic death.

60

Page 61: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

References Pal,G.K., 2007, Medical physiology, Ahuja publishing house, 1, 869-

870.

Tripathi, K.D. (2004) “Antiparkinsonian Drugs” , Essential of

Medical Pharmacology Jaypee Brother’s Medical Publisher’s ,

5.381-389.

Robert, P.S., et.al, 1997, Pharmacology of antiparkinsonism agents,

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 61, 179-180

Goodman & Gilman’s, 1996, Treatment of central nervous system

degenerative disorders, Mcgrawl Hill, 9, 506-512.

61

Page 62: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Rang, P.H. et al (2003) “Nuerodegenerative Disease” Pharmacology,

Elsevier Science limited, 5.497-499.

Richard, A.H.(2000) “Treatment of Parkinsons Disease”,

Pharmacology,Lippincotts Williams & Wilkins, 2.83-84

Wei, Zhang, et.al. (2004) Neuroprotective effect of drugs in the

MPTP Parkinson disease model : Role of NADPH Oxidase , FASEB

Journal express article

Von Bohlen and Halbach , (2006), Animal model of Parkinsons

disease ,Neurogenerative Disease 313 -320

62

Page 63: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Heikktla, R.E., et.al., 1981, L-dopa induced circling nigral lesions rats,

vol 15, 75-79.

www. harvardapparatus.com

Bracha, H.S., et.al, 1986, Spontaneous asyymetric circling behavior in

hemiparkinsonism , vol 40, 1127-1130.

Cesanov, B. elevated body swing test (1995) journal of neuro science

15(7) 5372-5378.

Vogel, H .G. et al (2002) , Antiparkinson activity Drug discovery and

evaluation Springer Heidelberg ltd 2.576 -586.

Salvador, H.L., et al, (1996) Muscarinic antagonist microinjected into

subthalamic nucleus decrease muscaranic rigidity in reserpinenized rats,

157-160 . 63

Page 64: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

www.supertech picture mouse www.jove.com

Tracy, D.F., et.al., 2002, Quantitative & Qualitative

impairments in skilled reaching in the mouse, 33, 1869-1875.

Tonnas ,R.G., et.a., 2001, In methanamphetamine abuse a risk

factors parkinsonism, 22, 725-731.

Frangois ,W., et.al., 2003, Modulatory action of acetylcholine

on striatal neuron, European journal of neuroscience, 17, 613-

622.

Joseph T.D., et.al., 2005, Parkinsons disease pharmacotherapy,

Mcgrawl hill, 6, 1075-1086.

64

Page 65: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

Roger.W.et al, “Parkinson ‘s Disease” Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, Elsevier Science limited, 3.483-486.

Olsson M., et.al., 1995, Forelimb akinesia in the rat Parkinson's model, New stepping test, Journal of Neuroscience, 15(5), 3863-3875.

Glori, E, et.al., 2006, Behavioral model of parkinsons disease in rodents moment disorder, 21, 1595-1606.

Todd, b., et.al., 2002, Invitro model of parkinsons disease linking mitochondrial impairment to altered Synuclien metabolism & oxidation damage, Journal of neuroscience, 22(16), 7006-7015.

Nancy ,Jeamme,Stevens., (2006) ,Stability, Limb Coordination and Substrate Type: The Ecorelevance of Gait Sequence Pattern in Primates, Journal of experimental zoology 305A:953–963.

65

Page 66: Anti  parkinsons drugs evaluation

THANK YOU

66