ans_practice-2 summer 1 2012

31
Week 1 E2.1. Category Financial Statement(s) Cash…………………………………………… A BS Accounts payable…………….……………….. L BS Common stock………………………………… OE BS Depreciation expense………………………….. E IS Net sales……………………………………….. R IS Income tax expense……………………………. E IS Short-term investments………………………... A BS Gain on sale of land……………………………. G IS Retained earnings……………………………… OE BS Dividends payable…………………………….. L BS Accounts receivable…………………………… A BS Short-term debt………………………………… L BS E2.2. Category Financial Statement(s) Accumulated depreciation……………………... A BS Long-term debt………………………………… L BS Equipment……………………………………… A BS Loss on sale of short-term investments………... LS IS Net income……………………………………… OE IS Merchandise inventory………………………… A BS Other accrued liabilities………………………… L BS Dividends paid…………………………………. OE Neither* Cost of goods sold……………………………… E IS Additional paid-in capital………………………. OE BS Interest income…………………………………. R IS Selling expenses……………………………….. E IS * Trick question! “Dividends paid” appears only on the Statement of Changes in Owners’ Equity. Dividends paid are distributions of earnings that reduce retained earnings on the balance sheet. Dividends paid are not expenses, and do not appear on the income statement. E2.4. Use the accounting equation to solve for the missing information Firm A: A = L + PIC + ( Beg. RE + NI - DIV = End. RE ) $ ? = $80,000 + $55,000 + ( $50,000 + 68,000 - $12,000 = ? )

Upload: dellendo-farquharson

Post on 01-Oct-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Week 1

    E2.1.

    Category

    Financial

    Statement(s) Cash A BS

    Accounts payable... L BS

    Common stock OE BS

    Depreciation expense.. E IS

    Net sales.. R IS

    Income tax expense. E IS

    Short-term investments... A BS

    Gain on sale of land. G IS

    Retained earnings OE BS

    Dividends payable.. L BS

    Accounts receivable A BS

    Short-term debt L BS

    E2.2.

    Category

    Financial

    Statement(s) Accumulated depreciation... A BS

    Long-term debt L BS

    Equipment A BS

    Loss on sale of short-term investments... LS IS

    Net income OE IS

    Merchandise inventory A BS

    Other accrued liabilities L BS

    Dividends paid. OE Neither*

    Cost of goods sold E IS

    Additional paid-in capital. OE BS

    Interest income. R IS

    Selling expenses.. E IS

    * Trick question! Dividends paid appears only on the Statement of Changes in Owners Equity. Dividends paid are distributions of earnings that reduce retained earnings on the balance sheet. Dividends paid are not expenses, and do not

    appear on the income statement.

    E2.4.

    Use the accounting equation to solve for the missing information

    Firm A:

    A = L + PIC + ( Beg. RE + NI - DIV = End. RE )

    $ ? = $80,000 + $55,000 + ( $50,000 + 68,000 - $12,000 = ? )

  • In this case, the ending balance of retained earnings must be determined first:

    $50,000 + $68,000 - $12,000 = End. RE.

    Retained earnings, 12/31/09 = $106,000

    Once the ending balance of retained earnings is known, total assets can be determined:

    A = $80,000 + $55,000 + $106,000

    Total assets, 12/31/09 = $241,000

    Firm B:

    A = L + PIC + ( Beg. RE + NI - DIV = End. RE )

    $435,000 = ? + $59,000 + ( $124,000 + $110,000 - ? = $186,000 )

    $435,000 = L + $59,000 + $186,000

    Total liabilities, 12/31/09 = $190,000

    $124,000 + $110,000 - DIV = $186,000

    Dividends declared and paid during 2009 = $48,000

    Firm C:

    A = L + PIC + ( Beg. RE + NI - DIV = End. RE )

    $155,000 = $75,000 + $45,000 + ( ? + $25,500 - $16,500 = ? )

    In this case, the ending balance of retained earnings must be determined first:

    $155,000 = $75,000 + $45,000 + End. RE

    Retained earnings, 12/31/09 = $35,000

    Once the ending balance of retained earnings is known, the beginning balance of retained

    earnings can be determined:

    Beg. RE + $25,500 - $16,500 = $35,000

    Retained earnings, 1/1/09 = $26,000

    Week 2

    E3.8.

    a. Margin * 2.4 Turnover = 12% ROI

    Margin = 5%

    5% Margin = (Net Income / Sales $96,000,000)

    Net Income = $4,800,000 (or $4.8 million)

    b. ROE = ($4,800,000 Net income / $32,000,000 Average owners' equity) = 15%

    P3.11.

  • a. ROI = Margin * Turnover

    = (Net income / Net revenues) * (Net revenues / Average total assets)

    = ($5,044 / $35,382) * ($35,382 / (($48,314 + $48,368) / 2))

    = (14.3% Margin * 0.73 turnover) = 10.4%

    b. ROE = Net income / Average stockholders' equity

    = $5,044 / (($36,182 + $36,752) / 2) = 13.8%

    c. Working capital = Current assets - Current liabilities

    12/30/06 12/31/05 Current assets ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $18,280 $21,194

    - Current liabilities .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 8,514 9,234

    = Working capital ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 9,766 $11,960

    d. Current ratio = Current assets / Current liabilities

    12/30/06 12/31/05 Current assets ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... $18,280 $21,194

    / Current liabilities .... ........... ........... ........... ........... 8,514 9,234 = Current ratio ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 2.1 2.3

    e. Acid-test ratio = (Cash + Short-term securities + Accounts and Notes receivable)

    Current liabilities

    12/30/06 12/31/05 Cash and cash equivalents ..... ........... ........... ........... $ 6,598 $ 7,234 Short-term investments ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... 2,270 3,990

    Trading assets ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1,134 1,458 Accounts receivable, net ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... 2,709 3,914

    Total (quick assets) ... ........... ........... ........... ........... $12,711 $16,596

    Total (quick assets) ........... ........... ........... ........... $12,711 $16,596 / Current liabilities.... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 8,514 9,234

    = Acid-test ratio ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1.5 1.8

    E4.1.

    ASSETS = LIABILITIES + OWNERS' EQUITY Accounts Merchandise Notes Accounts Paid in Retained

    Cash + Receivable + Inventory + Equipment = Payable + Payable + Capital + Earnings + Rev - Exp

    a. +8,000 +8,000

    b. +5,000 +5,000

    c. -1,750 +1,750

    d. -1,400 -1,400

    e. -9,000 +15,000 +6,000

    f. +6,500 -4,000 +6,500 -4,000

    g. +100 -100

    h. -1,200 +4,200 +3,000

    i. +3,900 +9,600 -9,000 +13,500 -9,000

    j. +1,850* -1,850

  • k. +3,160 -3,160

    l. -4,720 -4,720

    ______ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ______ _____

    8,490 + 6,440 + 6,200 + 1,750 = 5,000 + 6,230 + 8,000 + + 20,000 - 16,350

    Month-end totals: Assets $22,880 = Liabilities $11,230 + Owners' equity $11,650

    Net income for the month: Revenues $20,000 - Expenses $16,350 = Net income $3,650

    * Ordinarily, the Wages Payable account would be increased for employee wage expense

    that has been incurred but not yet paid.

    Optional Continuation:

    BLUE CO. STORES, INC.

    Income Statement

    Sales.. $20,000

    Cost of goods sold. (13,000) Gross profit $ 7,000

    Rent expense. (1,400) Wages expense.. (1,850)

    Advertising expense.. (100) Net income (this exercise ignores income taxes).. $ 3,650

    E4.1. (continued)

    BLUE CO. STORES, INC.

    Balance Sheet

    Assets:

    Cash... $ 8,490 Accounts receivable.. 6,440

    Merchandise inventory.. 6,200 Total current assets $21,130

    Equipment (this exercise ignores depreciation) 1,750 Total assets $22,880

    Liabilities:

    Notes payable $ 5,000 Accounts payable.. 6,230

    Total liabilities.. $11,230

    Owners Equity: $ 8,000

    Paid-in Capital... 3,650

    Retained earnings *... $11,650 Total owners equity.. $22,880

    Total liabilities and owners equity...

  • * Since this was the first month of operations, the Retained Earnings account would have

    a $0 beginning balance. Thus, the net income for the month creates a positive balance in

    retained earnings.

    P4.17.

    Balance Sheet Income Statement .

    Assets = Liabilities + Owners Equity Net income = Revenues - Expenses a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    e.

    Cash Common Stock

    +1,000,000 +1,000,000

    Cash Notes Payable

    +500,000 +500,000

    Cash Salaries Exp

    -380,00 -380,000

    Merchandise Accounts

    Inventory Payable

    +640,000 +640,000

    Accounts Rec Sales

    +910,000 +910,000 Cost of

    Merchandise Inv Goods Sold

    -580,000 -580,000

    Balance Sheet Income Statement .

    Assets = Liabilities + Owners Equity Net income = Revenues - Expenses

  • f.

    g.

    h.

    i.

    j.

    Cash Rent Exp

    -110,000 -110,000

    Equipment Accounts

    +150,000 Payable

    Cash +100,000

    -50,000

    Cash Accounts

    -720,000 Payable

    -720,000

    Cash Utilities Exp

    -36,000 -36,000

    Cash

    +825,000

    Accounts Rec

    -825,000

    k.

    l.

    Interest Pay Interest Exp

    +60,000 -60,000

    Rent Payable Rent Exp

    +10,000 -10,000

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    Journal entries:

    Dr. Cash ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1,000,000

    Cr. Common Stock ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1,000,000

    Dr. Cash ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 500,000

    Cr. Notes Payable .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 500,000

    Dr. Salaries Expense ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 380,000

    Cr. Cash . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 380,000

    Dr. Merchandise Inventory .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 640,000

    Cr. Accounts Payable .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 640,000

  • e.

    f.

    g.

    h.

    i.

    j.

    k.

    l.

    Dr. Accounts Receivable ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 910,000

    Cr. Sales ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 910,000

    Dr. Cost of Goods Sold ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 580,000

    Cr. Merchandise Inventory.......... ........... ........... ........... ........... 580,000

    Dr. Rent Expense ..... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 110,000

    Cr. Cash . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 110,000

    Dr. Equipment .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 150,000

    Cr. Cash . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 50,000

    Cr. Accounts Payable .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 100,000

    Dr. Accounts Payable ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 720,000 Cr. Cash . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 720,000

    Dr. Utilities Expense ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 36,000

    Cr. Cash . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 36,000

    Dr. Cash ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 825,000

    Cr. Accounts Receivable ........... ........... ........... ........... 825,000

    Dr. Interest Expense . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 60,000

    Cr. Interest Payable ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 60,000

    Dr. Rent Expense ..... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 10,000

    Cr. Rent Payable (or Accounts Payable) ........... ........... 10,000

    P4.18.

    a.

    Solution approach: Prepare a T-account to determine the Cash account balance, and

    then review the results of the horizontal model representations (or journal entries above).

    Since there are a limited number of transactions in Problem 4.17., the balances of all of

    the other accounts should be easy to determine.

    Cash

    a. 1,000,000 c. 380,000

    b. 500,000 f. 110,000

    j. 825,000 g. 50,000

    h. 720,000

    i. 36,000

    1,029,000

  • a. KISSICK, CO.

    Income Statement

    Sales .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 910,000

    Cost of goods sold ..... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (580,000)

    Gross profit ... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 330,000

    Rent expense . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (120,000)

    Utilities expense ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (36,000)

    Salaries expense ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (380,000)

    Loss from operations . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $(206,000)

    Interest expense ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (60,000)

    Net loss (the problem ignores income taxes) ........... ........... ........... $(266,000)

    KISSICK, CO.

    Balance Sheet

    Assets: Cash .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,029,000

    Accounts receivable .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 85,000

    Merchandise inventory .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 60,000

    Total current assets .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,174,000

    Equipment (the problem ignores depreciation) ......... ........... ........... 150,000

    Total assets .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,324,000

    Liabilities: Accounts payable ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 20,000

    Interest payable ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 60,000

    Rent payable .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 10,000

    Total current liabilities .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 90,000

    Notes payable ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 500,000

    Total liabilities .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 590,000

    Owners Equity: Common stock ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,000,000

    Deficit * ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (266,000)

    Total owners equity . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 734,000 Total liabilities and owners equity ... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,324,000

    Since this was the first year of operations, the Retained Earnings account would have a

    $0 beginning balance. Thus, the net loss for the year creates a deficit.

    b. Note to Instructor: Students should be able to determine the net loss amount

    because there are so few transactions to analyze in Problem 4-17 (the solution to these

    transactions is provided on the texts website). Begin the in-class discussion by asking, What do you think went wrong that caused such a large net loss?

  • Point out that it is not unusual for a start-up company to show a significant net loss in the first year of operationsbecause of the cost of organizing the business, and because the revenue-generating process may be delayed for several

    months (or longer) until the firms products can be successfully marketed.

    Kissisk Co. is a merchandising firm (not a manufacturer) because it has purchased $640,000 of Merchandise Inventory. The company must be renting its

    store location because it has incurred rent expense of $120,000, but owns no land

    or buildings.

    Note that the Cash account represents approximately 78% of Kissick Co.s total assets!

    Much of the firms cash was borrowed on a two-year, 12% note payable (as opposed to generating cash flows from operations). Thus, interest and principal

    payments will be substantial in the firms second year of operationsand this adds risk to the firms already shaky earnings prospects.

    Some of the excess cash may be only temporarily available. For example, much of the excess cash is likely to be needed for the acquisition of sales facilities, so

    that the firm can reduce its rent expense in future years.

    In the meantime, any excess cash that is not needed in the day-to-day operations of the firm should be invested in short-term securities (to earn a return on

    investment of some kind).

    Salary expense of $380,000 seems high for a firm with less than $1 million in sales.

    E9.6.

    a. Sales (in millions) ..... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $141.6 100.0%

    Cost of goods sold...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ? ? .

    Gross profit .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ ? 31.6%

    Gross profit = ($141.6 million sales * 31.6% gross profit ratio) = $44.7 million

    Cost of goods sold = ($141.6 million sales - $44.7 million gross profit) = $96.9 million

    Alternative computation for cost of goods sold:

    $141.6 million sales * (100% - 31.6%) cost of goods sold ratio = $96.9 million

    b. Selling price ... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ ? 100.0%

    Cost to manufacture ... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1,860

    Gross profit .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ ? 31.6%

    Selling price = $1,860 cost / (100% - 31.6%) cost of goods sold ratio = $2,719.30

  • E9.11.

    a. ($760,000 sales on account + $24,000 decrease in accounts receivable) = $784,000

    source of cash. Since accounts receivable decreased during the year, more accounts were

    collected in cash than were created by credit sales.

    Accounts Receivable

    Sales on account 760,000 Cash collections

    from customers 784,000

    Excess of collections

    over sales on account 24,000

    b. ($148,000 income tax expense + $34,000 decrease in income taxes payable) = $182,000

    use of cash. Tax payments exceeded the current years income tax expense because the payable account decreased.

    Income Taxes Payable Cash payments for taxes 182,000 Income tax expense 148,000

    Excess of payments

    over expense 34,000

    c. ($408,000 cost of goods sold + $14,000 increase in inventory - $19,000 increase in

    accounts payable) = $403,000 use of cash. Cost of goods sold reflects inventory uses.

    Inventory purchases were greater than inventory uses because inventory increased during

    the year, but part of the inventory purchases were not paid for in cash because accounts

    payable also increased during the year.

    Inventory Inventory purchases 422,000 Cost of goods sold 408,000

    Excess of purchases

    over cost of goods sold 14,000

    Accounts Payable Cash paid to suppliers 403,000 Inventory purchases 422,000

    Excess of purchases over

    payments 19,000

    c. Management could use the $2,719.30 estimated selling price as a target in conducting marketing research studies to estimate the sales volume for the new product (within this

    general price range), thus, helping to assess its ultimate prospects for success at this price.

  • d. ($240,000 increase in net book value + $190,000 depreciation expense) = $430,000 use

    of cash. Since depreciation is an expense that does not affect cash, the amount of cash

    paid to purchase new buildings exceeded the increase in net book value. (Note: In some

    years, a firm may spend an enormous amount of cash to acquire new buildings and

    equipment, yet still report a decrease in net book value.)

    Buildings, net of Accumulated Depreciation

    Purchase of buildings 430,000 Depreciation expense 190,000

    Excess of purchases over

    depreciation expense 240,000

    P9.18.

    a. Net sales ......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $579,000

    Cost of goods sold...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (272,000)

    Gross profit .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $307,000

    Research and development expenses . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (37,000)

    Selling, general and administrative expenses ........... ........... ........... ........... (51,000)

    Operating income (or Income from operations) ........ ........... ........... ........... $219,000

    b. Operating income (or Income from operations) ........ ........... ........... ........... $219,000

    Interest expense.......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (64,000)

    Income from continuing operations before taxes ...... ........... ........... ........... $155,000

    Provision for income taxes .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (74,000)

    Income from continuing operations ... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 81,000

    Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax savings of $5,000 ..... ........... (16,000)

    Earnings before extraordinary item ... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 65,000

    Extraordinary gain from fire insurance proceeds, net of tax

    expense of $28,000 . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 104,000 Net income ..... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $169,000

    P9.23.

    a. Solution approach: Prepare a statement of cash flows-direct method (see Exhibit 9-9).

    Cash flows from operating activities: (in millions) Cash collected from customers .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $1,350

    Interest and taxes paid ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (90)

    Cash paid to suppliers and employees ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (810)

    Net cash provided by operating activities ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 450

    b. Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of land and buildings .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $(170)

    Proceeds from the sale of equipment . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 40

    Net cash used for investing activities ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $( 130)

  • c. Cash flows from financing activities: Payment of long-term debt .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ (220)

    Issuance of preferred stock .... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 300

    Cash dividends declared and paid ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... (340)

    Net cash used for financing activities ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $( 260)

    d. Net increase in cash for the year ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ 60

    Week 3

    Thomas & Maurice Chapter 1

    1. a. Total explicit cost = $793,000 (= 555,000 + 45,000 + 28,000 + 165,000) Total implicit cost = $190,000 (= 175,000 + 0.15 100,000) Total economic cost = $983,000 (= 793,000 + 190,000)

    b. Accounting profit = $177,000 (= 970,000 793,000)

    c. Economic profit = $13,000 (= 970,000 983,000)

    d. The owners accounting profit is $13,000 less than what he could have earned in salary and return on investment of his $100,000, i.e., his economic profit is $13,000. Thus, he would have made $13,000 more if he had kept his job and invested his $100,000 in stocks of other businesses.

    3. a. Burton's explicit cost's are $18,000 per month. His implicit costs are $20,000 per

    month ($15,000 + $5,000).

    b. Opportunity cost = explicit + implicit costs = $18,000 + 20,000 = $38,000 per

    month

    c. Burton Cummings costs of production (= $38,000/month) exceed his revenues

    by $13,000 (=25,000 38,000). Rather than lose $13,000 per month, Burton could rent his rig (and receive $15,000 per month) and drive trucks for another

    firm (and earn $5,000 per month). With this use of his resources he would earn

    $20,000 per month. Or, Burton could try his luck as a singer in a rock band.

    Thomas & Maurice Chapter 2

    1. a. Demand will decrease, so price will decrease. b. Supply will increase, so price will decrease. c. Demand will increase, so price will increase. d. Demand will decrease, so price will decrease. e. Supply will decrease, so price will increase. f. Supply will increase, so price will decrease. g. Supply will increase (when the price of a complement in production increases),

    so price will decrease. h. Demand will decrease, so price will decrease.

  • 4. a. No effect on demand (no shift)just a movement up the demand. b. Decrease demand for hotels. c. Demand for rental cars decreases. d. Supply of overnight mail decreases.

    5. Construct a demand and supply diagram like Panel A of Figure 2.12.

    a. Imposing rent controls creates a shortage of low-income housing, which decreases the quantity supplied at the lower rent imposed by the controls compared to the amount of housing supplied at the market-clearing (higher) rent level.

    b. No, the shortage created by rent controls means that more low-income families are willing and able to pay for rent-controlled housing than the amount of rent controlled housing that is available. Compare this to the situation before rent-controls in which markets clear at higher rent levels.

    c. In the short run, families who are able to get housing at the lower rent levels may be better off. In many cases, however, families must pay large bribes under the table to get into the rent-controlled homes. And, as time passes, landlords have little or no incentive to make repairs to the rent-controlled units. Politicians may also gain from rent controls because it appears to be a compassionate policy to help the poor. The losers are the families who cannot get the rent-controlled housing even though they are willing and able to pay the higher market-clearing rent.

    d. History has shown that rent-controlled districts over time fall into a state of decay and ruin. Rent-controlled properties undermine the incentive for landlords to maintain the housing. With a shortage of low-income housing, low rent housing will be fully rented no matter what condition the roof or plumbing might be in. Furthermore, if landlords let the property decay sufficiently, renters will leave, and the property can be converted to some other use (commercial or industrial use) not subject to rent controls.

    e. Taxpayers, genuinely compassionate about providing more housing for low-income families, could offer builders subsidies to build low-income housing. In the absence of rent controls, this would shift supply rightward and equilibrium rents would fall. Also, there would be no shortage of low income housing. Owners would have incentives to properly maintain roofs and plumbing. Of course building subsidies would cost real money; but everyone knows that theres no such thing as a free lunch (well, maybe not everyone knows this).

    8. To the extent that consumers really do care about whether or not a firm behaves in a "socially responsible" manner, disseminating information about "progressive business practices" causes demand to increase for products produced by the socially responsible firms. An increase in demand, ceteris paribus, results in a higher price for products of socially responsible firms.

  • 6. In the graph, let D0 be the initial demand for

    tickets to Disneyland and S0 be the supply of

    tickets to Disneyland. Slowing tourism causes

    demand to decrease, as represented by the

    demand curve D1. The new rides at Six Flags

    further reduce demand to D2. These events all

    result in lower ticket prices at Disneyland as well

    as reduced attendance. This is not a violation of

    the law of demand since price is falling due to a

    decrease (shift) in demand, not a movement

    along a given demand curve.

    10. In the figure, the environmental curbs on burning wood causes supply to shift leftward from S0 to S1. The substitution from burning wood to gas hearths is represented by the leftward shift in demand from D0 to D1. Comparing initial equilibrium point A to B, the price of firewood has remained unchanged while the quantity of firewood burned decreases.

    Frank & Bernanke Chapter 18

    4a. U.S. assets become less attractive, so the demand for dollars falls. The dollar

    depreciates.

    b. The demand for U.S. goods (software) falls, so the demand for dollars falls. The

    dollar depreciates.

    c. Financial investors switch funds from U.S. assets to East Asian assets, demand fewer

    dollars (or supplying more). The dollar depreciates.

    d. As Americans are dissuaded from buying imported automobiles, they supply fewer

    dollars to the foreign exchange market. The dollar appreciates.

    e. Financial investors would anticipate that the Fed will lower interest rates, making

    U.S. financial assets less attractive. The demand for dollars falls and the dollar

    depreciates. This effect may be offset to some degree by the impending recession itself,

    which would be expected to lower the U.S. demand for imports and hence reduce the

    supply of dollars, putting upward pressure on the dollar.

    f. As Americans increase their spending on imported goods they supply more dollars to

    the foreign exchange market. The dollar depreciates.

    8. In dollars, the British automobile costs 20,000 x $1.50/ or $30,000. The price of the

    U.S. car relative to the British car is thus $26,000/$30,000 = 0.867, that is, the U.S. car is

    cheaper. From the British perspective, the value of the U.S. car in pounds is 26,000/1.50

    = 17,333. The price of the British car relative to the U.S. car is 20,000/17,333 =

    1.154 (which, by the way, equals 1/0.867). So, either way we calculate it, we find that

    the British car is more expensive and the U.S. car is more competitively priced.

    Pri

    ce

    of

    a t

    ick

    et

    (do

    lla

    rs)

    N u m b er o f t ic k e ts

    $

    D0

    D1D

    2

    S

    P2

    P0

    Q2

    Q0

  • Week 4

    Thomas & Maurice Chapter 3

    1. a. One way of reducing traffic deaths is to reduce speed. While it may be possible

    to eliminate all traffic deaths by allowing motorists to drive no faster than 15

    MPH in cars equipped with driver and passenger air bags, most American drivers

    would not view a 15 MPH speed limit as optimal. Most drivers seem willing to

    accept some additional probability of death in return for faster speeds. The 70

    MPH speed limit would be optimal if the marginal benefit of reducing speed

    limits equals the marginal cost of reducing speed limits. Just because reducing

    speed limits to 65 MPH would save even more lives does not, by itself, mean that

    further reduction in speed limits should be undertaken. The marginal benefit of

    speed reduction must be compared to the marginal cost.

    b. If it costs nothing to eliminate pollution (i.e. MC = 0), then the optimal level of

    pollution would indeed be zero. When the marginal cost of pollution abatement

    is greater than zero, as it is for virtually every type of pollution, the optimal level

    of pollution occurs at that level of pollution for which the marginal benefit to

    society of eliminating more pollution just equals the marginal cost of eliminating

    more pollution. In fact, it is possible to have too little pollution if pollution

    abatement activities have been undertaken such that the marginal cost of

    abatement exceeds the marginal benefit.

    c. To maximize net benefit, troops should be left in Afhanistan if the marginal

    benefit exceeds the marginal cost. Since marginal benefit and marginal cost are

    measures of additional (or extra) benefits and costs, benefits and costs already

    incurred do not matter (i.e. do not affect MB and MC). Sunk costs or benefits do

    not enter the decision making process, only incremental benefits and costs

    matter.

    d. see answer to part c

    e. Insurance premiums are fixed costs. The optimal level has nothing to do with

    how high or how low fixed costs go.

    2. Appalachian Coal Mining should minimize net cost by choosing that level of pollution

    (P) where the marginal benefit of pollution reduction equals the marginal cost of

    pollution reduction:

    1,000 10P = 40P P

    * = 20 units of pollution.

    3. The second partner is basing his objection to the move on costs that are sunk. The money

    spent on office stationary, business cards, and a sign that cannot be moved to the new

    office are not marginal costs in the decision to move and should thus be ignored. In other

    words, the cost of the old cards, old stationary, and old sign are sunk costs to be ignored

    in making the decision to move the office, while any costs of purchasing new business

    cards, new stationary, or a new sign are part of the marginal cost of making the move. If,

    as the first partner seems to believe, MB exceeds MC for making the move, then net

    benefit rises even though new cards, stationary, and a sign must be purchased.

  • 4. a. 2

    b. $500 (= $25 20 radios not stolen due to hiring 1 guard) c. 4

    Frank & Bernanke Chapter 4

    1. Slowing population growth and an increased share of retired people both imply slower growth in the number of people employed. If average labor productivity

    (output per employed worker) continues to grow at earlier rates, total output will still

    grow more slowly than before, because of slower growth in the number of workers.

    If average labor productivity stagnates, then total output will grow very slowly or

    even decline.

    Living standards depend not on total output but on output divided by the total

    population. Slowing population growth reduces total output but also the number of

    people who share that output. So slower population growth in itself should not

    affect living standards. However, a reduced share of the population that is working,

    all else equal, will reduce output per person, lowering living standards. Slower

    productivity growth will only worsen this problem.

    4. a. Positive (a statement about what is likely to happen).

    b. Normative (a statement about what the Fed should do).

    c. Positive.

    d. Positive.

    e. Normative (depends on views about the fairness of the tax code).

    5. a. Microeconomist (operations of an individual firm).

    b. Microeconomist (behavior of an individual market).

    c. Macroeconomist (behavior of economy as a whole; uses aggregation to study a

    broad trend)

    d. Macroeconomist (behavior of the economy as a whole)

    e. Macroeconomist (behavior of a broad macroeconomic aggregate, consumer

    spending)

    Frank & Bernanke Chapter 18

    7a. If the real interest rate in Eastland is higher than the real interest rate in Westland,

    financial investors in Westland will want to buy Eastland assets, and hence will demand

    eastmarks. The demand equation shows that, the greater the difference between the real

    returns in Eastland and Westland, the higher the demand for eastmarks. Similarly, if the

    return in Eastland is greater than the return in Westland, financial investors in Eastland

    will not be eager to buy Westlands financial assets, and thus will not supply so many eastmarks to the foreign exchange market. The supply equation implies that, the greater

  • the difference between the real returns in Eastland and Westland, the fewer eastmarks

    will be supplied to the foreign exchange market.

    b. If the real interest rates are equal, the last term drops out of both the supply and

    demand equations. Setting demand equal to supply we can find the fundamental value of

    the eastmark:

    25,000 5,000e = 18,500 + 8,000e 6,500 = 13,000e

    e = 0.5 westmarks/eastmark

    c. Now rE rW = 0.10 0.12 = -0.02. Setting demand equal to supply we have

    25,000 5,000e + 50,000(-0.02) = 18,500 + 8,000e 50,000(-0.02)

    24,000 5,000e = 19,500 + 8,000e 4,500 = 13,000e

    e = 0.346 westmarks/eastmark

    So the increase in Westlands real interest rate has caused the fundamental value of the

    eastmark to decline, relative to the westmark.

    d. The depreciation of the eastmark makes Eastlands goods cheaper abroad, and makes imports from Westland more expensive. So the depreciation should raise Eastlands net exports and hence its aggregate demand.

    e. To restore the fundamental value of the eastmark to 0.5 westmarks/eastmark,

    Eastland will have to match the real interest rate increase in Westmark, setting rE = 0.12.

    If the difference in real interest rates is zero, then the same calculation as in part b shows

    that e = 0.5. However, the higher real interest rate in Eastland will depress aggregate

    demand and output.

    f. Because of the fixed exchange rate, Eastland was forced to match Westlands monetary tightening, whether or not it was an appropriate move for Eastlands domestic economy. This illustrates the point that maintaining a fixed exchange rate eliminates a

    countrys ability to use monetary policy independently to stabilize its domestic economy.

    Week 6

    Chapter 1

    7. There is no doubt that growth of the Internet will open up new marketing

    opportunities--it already has, and so far we're just seeing the tip of the iceberg.

    Will growth of these services ultimately eliminate the need for retailers and

    wholesalers? Perhaps over the longer run we will see services such as these

    taking over for some types of retailers and wholesalers. Clearly, at present the

    focus of the Internet (and other similar network systems) is on fast, interactive

    communication. In the past, most marketing communication has been limited--

  • it's one way communication from seller to buyer--except in the case of personal

    selling. The Internet, direct response cable TV, and even toll-free telephone

    systems are quickly changing that.

    The Internet can help to overcome separation in time and information. It might

    also be possible to create very diverse "virtual" assortments of products that are

    practical because they are available to a very large number of people. Thus, the

    Internet is well suited for the buying and selling function (in some situations)

    and the market information functions. As such, it might also reduce some of

    the risk that otherwise might be inherent in transactions. On the other hand,

    someone is likely to need to deal with the transporting and storing functions

    and perhaps standardization and grading.

    While the person or company that sells over the Internet may not take the form

    of a retail store, it's useful to remind students that firms that sell out of a catalog

    are already using the basic approach characteristic of electronic shopping over a

    computer network. What is different here is the sophistication of the

    technology and speed of the communication more than the basic way the

    operation works.

    12. The marketing concept is defined on page 15. A firm must have some

    objective to guide its efforts--and a profit orientation provides such an

    objective. But the marketing concept says that an organization should have

    more than just profit as an objective. It should attempt to satisfy some

    customers and make a profit. Profit can be seen not only as an objective but as

    a constraint if one really gets carried away with the marketing concept. If a

    marketing manager really wanted to satisfy some customers very well, he could

    design a very pleasing marketing mix for them that might include free products

    or services! Adding profit in the definition, however, would preclude such a

    move. In other words, the marketing concept insists on some balance between

    fully satisfying some target customers and meeting a firm's own objectives.

    16. Students will come up with a variety of benefits and costs associated with the

    products for this question. At this point in their thinking about customer value,

    it is probably less important that they be detailed or exhaustive in coming up

    with examples than it is that they grasp the concept that each product (actually,

    each marketing mix) may have a variety of different benefits and costs. A class

    discussion is likely to highlight some cases when one student sees something as

    a benefit, but a different student argues that it is not so much a benefit as it is a

    cost if it is missing (e.g., good gas mileage may be a benefit of a car, or it may

    represent a cost if it is missing). The fact that different customers may frame benefits and costs in different ways is not treated as an important distinction in

    the literature on customer value. On the other hand, it can be useful to know

    when this sort of difference occurs because it is at least indirectly related to

    customer expectations.

  • (a) Wrist watch: Benefits: accuracy, attractiveness, durability, warranty, and

    status; Costs: the opposite of any of the above as well as factors such as hard to

    service, lack of warranty, price paid, or missing a needed battery.

    (b) Weight-loss diet supplement: Benefits: more self-esteem, more energy,

    greater sex appeal, convenient to prepare or consume; Costs: any unfavorable

    side effects (nervousness, high blood pressure, etc), difficult or inconvenient to

    obtain, high price.

    (c) Cruise on a luxury liner: Benefits: excitement, variety, relaxation, pleasure,

    social interactions; Costs: boredom, fear (say, of a fire or of the boat sinking),

    sea-sickness, expense.

    (d) Checking account from a bank: Benefits: convenience, record of spending

    (and in some cases cancelled checks), ability to obtain cash; Costs: monthly

    fees, check fees, fees for bounced checks, record keeping hassles,

    inconvenience of going to bank, some businesses do not accept checks, time to

    show identification.

    Chapter 2

    4. It is important for a firm to have a clearly defined target market even if a

    company sells its products only from a website. This question is designed to

    prompt students to think about the idea of the website in the context of the

    marketing mix. The fact that the firm is distributing to customers direct via its website (rather than through wholesalers or retailers) is certainly an

    important decision in the marketing mix context, but the fact that the website it

    available to customers from all over the world doesnt mean that the firms offering will be attractive to customers regardless of geographic location. The

    marketer still needs to think about the benefits of its product offering relative to

    the needs of some set of customers, what competitors are offering those

    customers, when and how the product is going to get to the customers place, what communications (promotion, customer service, etc.) the customers will

    need, what price is appropriate, and the like. There is intense competition for

    attention and business on the Internet, and just building a better mousetrap (if the firm has in fact done thatwhether it is the product offering OR the website itself!) is not any sort of assurance that it will attract, satisfy, and retain

    customers. A firm that has a specific target market will be able to fine tune its

    message and the rest of the marketing mix to the needs of the target customers,

    and that increases the odds that it can offer them superior customer value.

    10. This question is designed to get the students thinking about the various target

    markets which might be aimed at for a particular product--and the many factors

    which ought to be considered. If the instructor is familiar with the development

    of a new marketing strategy, it probably will be preferable to substitute this

    product for one of those suggested--in order to give the students a better "feel"

    for reality.

    This exercise can easily lead into an interesting discussion of marketing

    strategy planning and all of the problems that can arise (but the instructor must

  • guard against it degenerating into just a "bull" session). The general approach

    will be illustrated below for the new toothbrush.

    The students must be led to see that there are many different potential target

    markets before going on to the development of one whole strategy. It might

    help to begin by trying to determine the degree of interest of some target

    consumers in toothbrushes in general--and the extent of interest they might

    have in the particular kind of product being considered. Using the marketing

    strategy diagram (p. 49) as a framework--to begin to segment the "toothbrush

    market"--you could lead them to ask questions such as: What do consumers

    look for in toothbrushes? Why do they buy them? Where do they buy them?

    How much do they pay for them? Who buys them? All of these questions

    should be raised by the students. Obviously, no one answer can be developed

    in the classroom for all these questions (there are many target markets), but

    some tentative conclusions might be advanced--some consumers are worried

    about their gums, not just their teeth, some people don't seem to think about

    brushes at all, some what a brush that's easy to pack for travel, etc.

    The next step would be to analyze the product in the light of the consumers'

    image of toothbrushes and the ritual of toothbrushing. If this product seems to

    have any possibilities for satisfying the needs of some consumers, then the

    other three Ps--Place, Promotion, and Price--will have to be considered. Where

    consumers traditionally buy toothbrushes may have a bearing on where they

    will have to be distributed. If the same types of places are chosen, a great deal

    of promotion may not be necessary. However, if an entirely new set of places

    is chosen, promotion may become more expensive. If the consumer is not

    particularly enthused about new products of this type, even if they are superior,

    then the latitude on pricing may be rather narrow. The marketing executive's

    job would be to weigh all of these four Ps in the light of consumer analysis in

    order to come up with a satisfactory marketing strategy.

    At this time, a well-organized discussion of all these points probably should not

    be expected of the students, but it is surprising what they can do. In the

    following pages some examples of students' work are presented to give you

    some idea of the caliber of work which can be expected this early in the course.

    A. The marketing problems I believe I would face if I were to develop a new

    design for a toothbrush:

    Concerning the consumer:

    1. Characteristics of buyer and users.

    2. Size of purchase.

    3. Unfavorable attitudes of buyers of brand.

    4. Class of buyers.

    5. Number of competitors and brands.

  • 6. Differentiation of own brand from leaders.

    Concerning the product:

    1. Quality.

    2. Models and sizes.

    3. Attractiveness.

    4. Shape, material, design, color, and copy.

    Concerning the place:

    1. Number of wholesalers and retailers.

    2. Degree of aggressive retailer cooperation.

    Concerning the price:

    1. Factory price.

    2. Wholesalers' and retailers' price.

    3. Discounts, allowances, and deals.

    4. Price support.

    Concerning the promotion:

    1. Selling. 2. Advertising. 3. Sales promotion.

    **********

    B. The first thing we have to do in setting up the marketing strategy is to

    determine the target market. The target for a new spinning reel would, most

    naturally, be the sport fisherman. Since the consumer is of such great

    importance in the selection of a strategy, he should be considered first and quite

    well. To begin with, sport fishermen can be from any social or financial class.

    This fact in itself presents somewhat of a problem. The reel has to be such that

    it will appeal to the majority of the people from these different groups.

    Next we have to determine just how we are going to design this item to

    accomplish this. We have to make it so it has all the qualities we want to have

    and still be priced right so it can be sold in the volume necessary to make a

    profit. We have to decide whether we are going to make all the component

    parts ourselves or if we are going to do any subcontracting. These and many

    more considerations must be made in this connection.

    Determining places of distribution to the customer is also very important. With

    an article such as a fishing reel the best markets would no doubt be in or near

  • river towns, fishing resorts, lakes, or oceans. In this same department you must

    determine how you are going to work your distribution end of the business,

    whether you are going to use wholesale outlets, brokers, franchised dealers, etc.

    The price of the reel now has to be set so that it will move fairly fast on the

    market. Competition will naturally have something to do in determining this

    price. You must also take into account the distributors and sales force and

    whether you are going to pay them a high commission.

    Since this is a new product, promotion is going to be of major importance in

    establishing good markets. You will have to concern yourself with advertising,

    sales promotions, and training salespeople among other things. I think these

    would be the greatest problem areas you would encounter.

    **********

    C. Consumers: The market target for the new wonder drug is all consumers, since

    at one time or another everybody gets sick. The drug will be also aimed at

    children since children are always getting sick. The drug should be promoted

    more to residents of cold or damp sections of the country since susceptibility to

    sickness is greater in these areas.

    The number of other brands are few since this is a new wonder drug. Brand

    loyalty will be low since this is a new product.

    Product: The product will be in pill form. In must be decided how many sizes

    of bottles and how many pills to each size there should be. The color of the

    coating of the pill is important in order to make it attractive to children. The

    color and graphical design of the box should stand out on the shelf.

    The brand name should be easy to pronounce and should be connected to the

    concept of curing sickness so that when someone thinks, "I am really sick, what

    can I take to get better?", immediately the name will pop into his mind after

    hearing it only once before.

    Place: Samples should be distributed to doctors. The main distribution will be

    through drugstores and drug counters in department stores.

    Price: The price should be within the reach of everybody first of all. It should

    be priced in the range of other drugs. Many people object to the high price of

    drugs but most will pay the price if they think the product is good. If the price

    is high, people feel that they are getting something good. So the price should

    appear a little high but not so high as to take a big chunk out of the average

    person's pocket.

  • Promotion: Since it is a medical discovery and a significant one, an attempt

    should be made to have articles printed in the various medical journals to show

    doctors how good the product really is. Television is the best medium for

    advertising the product. 'A famous doctor says' approach should be avoided

    since I think it is boring to people. But the doctor should not be left completely

    out the advertisement. It should be brought out that the drug is safe for all ages.

    All other modes of advertisement should also be used.

    **********

    D. The new type of industrial stapling machine causes students considerable

    trouble as few of them have had much industrial experience. This provides

    another opportunity to emphasize the need for careful customer analysis.

    For class discussion, it is useful to segment the stapling machine market into at

    least two parts--thus requiring two sets of answers. The two basic markets are

    for office use and for plant use for fastening boxes or for assembling wood or

    metal pieces.

    You might show that reaching office managers, production managers,

    purchasing agents, and even top executives in businesses where fastening is

    especially important affects the Place and Promotion variables. The problems

    of marketing industrial products should only be raised here, as they are treated

    extensively in the rest of the text. By the end of the book, the students will be

    able to handle such a problem very nicely. It might be fruitful at this time,

    however, to get the students to notice that industrial marketing would probably

    be more economically-oriented than final consumer marketing.

    Chapter 3

    2. Market segmentation is a two-step process of (1) naming broad product-

    markets and (2) segmenting these broad product-markets in order to select

    target markets and develop suitable marketing mixes. Naming a broad-product

    market involves "breaking apart"--disaggregating--all possible needs into some

    generic markets and broad product-markets in which the firm may be able to

    operate profitably. This step tries to "narrow down" to product-market areas

    where the firm is more likely to have competitive advantage. After this first

    narrowing down step, the second step is segmenting--aggregating individual

    customers with similar needs into a relatively homogeneous group of customers

    who will respond to a marketing mix in a similar way. See text pages 65-67.

    9. Positioning approaches show where proposed and/or present brands are

    located in a market--as seen by customers. This information can help marketing

    managers in a number of ways. First, it can help a marketing manager to decide

    whether he wants to leave his product where it is--or try to make changes (for

    example, in the product or in customer perceptions by changes in promotion). It

  • can show what brands are viewed as most similar to the firm's offering--and thus

    it can help to identify which brand is competing most directly with which other

    brands. It can also point to market segments whose needs are not being met by

    current offerings. Sometimes it can also help in making decisions about whether

    or not to try to combine several segments into a single target market.

    Week 6 Chapter 4

    3. Various company objectives might have an impact on the appropriate

    marketing strategy or strategies and then the marketing mix or mixes. This

    particular example provides an opportunity to introduce a discussion of the

    objectives that a giant company like Microsoft had when the Internet

    opportunity became an issue versus the objectives of a smaller company that

    was simply trying to become established. Thus, in the context of the specific

    question, some objectives that the former programmer might pursue could

    include:

    (1) Maximize profits in the next two years.

    (2) Find strategies that would not prompt aggressive competition

    (retaliation) by large, established firms in this market. (3) Rapid growth of the firm.

    (4) Build a reputation for reliable software and good technical support.

    (5) Offer a product that had clear advantages for at least some segment

    of the market

    (6) Build a large enterprise.

    Some of these objectives might be compatible with each other and lead to the

    use of the same marketing strategy or strategies. However, some objectives

    would clearly be incompatible. For example, trying to maximize profit in the

    next two years (ignoring what happens afterward) would probably rule out the

    development of a large-scale software application that would attempt to

    compete with Microsofts Internet Explorer or AOLs browser. That kind of effort would require much more time (to secure capital, hire a large number of

    qualified programmers, and develop a very complex software product). Rather,

    maximizing profit on a shorter term horizon might suggest some smaller scale,

    more focused application. For example, the programmer might focus on an

    Internet browser that was particularly well suited to the needs of real estate

    agents because it did a really good job of handling multiple listing information

    available on Internet websites. The real estate agent target market might be

    willing to pay higher prices for the higher quality browser (i.e., more specific to

    their needs) because it helped them earn more money.

    6. Students will have different opinions about the difficulty for the hardware store

    of planning for the new competitive threat: a competing store to be opened by a

    big home improvement chain. This scenario is in fact unfolding in smaller

  • towns all over the country as big chains like Home Depot, Lowes, and Home Quarters have aggressively expanded the number of stores that they open.

    Even though the question doesn't reveal much about the small store that is

    currently in the town, the question is quite clear in suggesting that the current

    store has a monopoly of sorts. It is also reasonable to expect that the new home

    improvement store will be very much like other stores in the chain. Thus, it

    might also be possible for the owner of the store to determine what happened in

    the past when the chain went into similar markets. This might even reveal

    markets in which a competitor had developed a very effective strategy for

    fending off the attack. For example, in one such case the local store added

    more service (including delivery) and more specialized services for building

    contractorssuch as rental tools or small engine repairs. The chain could offer lower prices on general home building items, but the smaller store had success

    maintaining good margins and profits by having a very good assortment of

    convenience items like nuts and screws and bolts that customers wanted to pick

    up quickly. The local store also put more emphasis of items of special interest

    in the local market (like water pipe heaters to prevent broken water pipes

    during the cold winter) that were not well represented in the product line of the

    chain store.

    9. Basically, it is attempting to protect consumers--but sometimes efforts have

    been made to protect individual competitors in the hope that this

    would preserve competition and help consumers.

    15. Answers here will vary significantly. However, examples of firms that are

    appealing to senior citizens include: financial services firms (mutual fund

    companies, banks, brokerage houses) who are offering a variety of retirement

    planning products; companies in the health care business (including insurance

    companies, hospitals, HMO, life-time care facilities); entertainment and leisure-

    time companies (travel agencies, recreational vehicles, adult education, crafts

    such as woodworking or gardening); and producers of fashion products

    (dresses, slacks, coats) designed to appeal to people whose bodies are not quite

    as buff as they once were. Example of firms that are appealing to teens include: transportation companies (automobiles); entertainment companies

    (movies, music CDs, TV programming); food companies (snack foods, candy,

    fast-food); educational services (colleges, music lessons, etc.); and companies

    in many sports-related businesses.

    Chapter 5

    1. The "economic buyer" model of consumer behavior suggests that people know

    all the facts (relevant to a purchase) and logically compare choices in terms of

    cost and value received to get the greatest satisfaction from spending their time

    and money. Thus, its focus is often on economic needs such as economy of

    purchase or use, convenience, efficiency in operation or use, dependability in

    use, or improvement in earnings.

  • Students are likely to give a wide variety of examples of purchases--both those

    that seem to be consistent with the economic buyer model and those that are

    not. The amount of information that the consumer had (or decided to get) is a

    factor that typically differentiates the different types of purchases. As these

    differences are brought out, it may be useful to discuss the idea that consumers

    are more willing to search for information and compare products (i.e.,

    consistent with the economic buyer model) in some situations than in others--

    for example, when the purchase is important, the financial risk is significant,

    etc. On the other hand, many purchases are made more or less habitually--

    especially once a satisfactory alternative has been found. For such purchases,

    most consumers see the cost of searching for more information as too high

    relative to its potential value.

    Some students may realize that "economic buyer" comparisons are usually

    easier to make when the alternative ways of meeting a need are comparable.

    For example, it may be easier to compare different brands of 13" color

    television sets than to decide whether to buy a new TV set or alternatively to

    spend the money on a ski weekend. Both may involve entertainment needs, but

    really represent very different alternatives. (Sometimes it is not easy to do

    economic comparisons even when alternatives are, on the surface, more similar.

    For example, a student who is interested in buying a large screen TV would

    need to decide if the extra money for a HDTV model, or perhaps a thin LCD

    model, was worth the difference in price. Evaluating the difference in price and

    features might be made even more difficult by uncertainty about how prices

    will change in the future (and/or how quickly more HD broadcasts become

    available).

    Student examples will often highlight purchases where economic buyer type

    comparisons don't seem sensible--or perhaps even feasible. For example, a

    purchase of a particular CD may be based on the emotional reaction to a

    particular song--or a specific artist. A purchase of a specific fashion item might

    be based on needs (such as status appeal or aesthetic reactions) that can't be

    easily calibrated on some sort on "economic need" basis. On the other hand,

    when the same basic products (brands) are available at different stores,

    consumers may search for the "best deal" on the desired product.

    8. Students will have varied responses to this question, perhaps in part because of

    differences in awareness of Hispanic people. There is not necessarily a right

    answer to this question, but rather it is intended to prompt students to think

    about how culture is pervasive in everyday activities such as grocery shopping.

    There are in fact a number of chains that have been successful in targeting the

    growing Hispanic subculture in California (and other areas). Some of the

    changes in "product" include more "familiar" brands imported from Mexico

    and different varieties of food, especially more choice of products that are basic

    to Hispanic cooking. For example, rice is popular in the Hispanic diet and there

  • are likely to be many more varieties of rice; by contrast, potatoes are less

    popular and there would not be as much interest in having a variety of different

    types of potatoes. Place would be important. Stores should be located in places

    that are convenient to Hispanics. There might be some problems in

    maintaining inventories or getting timely deliveries of some products--

    especially if they are not ones that are readily available from local wholesalers

    (including food brokers) or if they must be imported from Mexico. The most

    obvious change in promotion is probably the change from English to Spanish.

    However, there might also be a need for more personal selling in the store--as

    Hispanic shoppers tend to be less accepting of self-service grocery shopping

    than is typical for some segments of the U.S. population. In addition, "local"

    media--such as Hispanic radio stations and newspapers--oriented toward

    Hispanic shoppers might be the best bet for reaching the target market.

    Experience has shown that Hispanic shoppers are willing to pay higher prices at

    supermarkets that really cater to their needs and interests. Some students will

    argue that prices will need to be oriented to value and "low everyday prices"--

    as many Hispanics are not in the top income groups. While that is true, it is

    nevertheless the case that lower income Hispanics are willing to pay a bit extra

    to be able to shop at a store where the products and service offered match their

    taste.

    Week 7 Marchall, McManus, Viele Chapter 10

    P10.11.

    a. Net revenues in 2003 = $30,141 million (table, p. 25)

    b. Cost of goods sold in 2002 = $26,764 - $13,318 = $13,446 million (table, p. 25)

    c. Difference between operating income and net income in 2004 = $10,130 - $7,516

    = $2,614 million (table, p. 25)

    d. Year(s) in which net income decreased as compared to the previous year = 2006 only

    (table, p. 25)

    e. Amount of interest income earned = $636 million (table, p.70)

    f. Number of shares of stock options outstanding at December 30, 2006

    = 839.5 million (table, p.64)

    g. Total revenues from unaffiliated customers outside of the United States

    = $29,896 million (table, p.87, Total revenues $35,382 less U.S. $5,486)

  • h. Amount committed for the construction or purchase of property, plant, and equipment

    = Approximately $3.3 billion (p.84)

    i. Fair value of available-for-sale securities classified as floating rate notes

    = $3,512 million (p.68)

    j. Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of 2006 = $8,739 - $4,294

    = $4,445 million (table, p.91use September 30 column)

    P10.12.

    a. Percentage of R&D relative to net revenues in 2006 = $5,873 / $35,382 = 16.6%

    b. Amount by which property, plant and equipment decreased during 2006

    (i.e., for depreciation, asset sales, and similar transactions) =

    Net investment in property, plant & equipment, 2005 ...... ........... $17,111

    Additions to property, plant & equipment, 2006 .. ........... ........... 5,779

    Less: Decreases in property, plant & equipment, 2006 .... .......... ( ? )

    Net investment in property, plant & equipment, 2006 ...... ........... $17,602 million

    Solving for the missing amount, 2006 decreases = $5,288 million *

    * Note that Depreciation Expense for 2006 was $4,654 million and the Restructuring, asset impairment, and net loss on retirement of assets category was $635 million. These two amounts add to $5,289 million and thus are off by $1 million due to rounding (see

    the Statements of Cash Flows on page 51).

    c. Year in which stockholders equity grew by the greatest amount over the previous year

    = 2003, increased by $2,378 ($37,846 - $35,468). (table, p. 25).

    d. Change in total liabilities from 2002 to 2006 = $2,860 increase, as computed below (see

    table, p. 25):

    2006 2002 Change Total assets .... ........... ........... ........... ........... $48,368 $44,224 +$4,144

    Stockholders equity.. ........... ........... ........... 36,752 35,468 + 1,284 Total liabilities .......... ........... ........... ........... $11,616 $ 8,756 +$2,860

    e. Amount of work-in-process inventory = $2,044 million (table, p.58)

    f. Total amount of revenues from unaffiliated customers earned in Europe

    = $6,587 million (table, p.87)

    g. The companys effective tax rate = 28.6% (table, p.73)

  • h. Adjusted cost and estimated fair value of investments held in asset-backed securities

    = Adjusted cost = $1,633 million, Estimated fair value = $1,636 million (table, p.68)

    i. Market price range of common stock for the fourth quarter of 2006

    = High = $27.43, Low = $22.65 (table, p.91)

    j. Amount of land and buildings, exclusive of construction in progress

    = $14,544 million (table, p.58)

    Ross, Westerfield Jordan Chapter 3

    6. We need to calculate the net income before we calculate the earnings per share.

    The sum of dividends and addition to retained earnings must equal net income, so

    net income must have been:

    Net income = Addition to retained earnings + Dividends

    Net income = $530,000 + 190,000

    Net income = $720,000

    So, the earnings per share were:

    EPS = Net income / Shares outstanding

    EPS = $720,000 / 570,000

    EPS = $1.26 per share

    The dividends per share were:

    Dividends per share = Total dividends / Shares outstanding

    Dividends per share = $190,000 / 570,000

    Dividends per share = $0.33 per share

    The book value per share was:

    Book value per share = Total equity / Shares outstanding

    Book value per share = $6,800,000 / 570,000

    Book value per share = $11.93 per share

    The market-to-book ratio is:

    Market-to-book ratio = Share price / Book value per share

    Market-to-book ratio = $39 / $11.93

    Market-to-book ratio = 3.27 times

    The P/E ratio is:

  • P/E ratio = Share price / EPS

    P/E ratio = $39 / $1.26

    P/E ratio = 30.88 times

    Sales per share are:

    Sales per share = Total sales / Shares outstanding

    Sales per share = $16,000,000 / 570,000

    Sales per share = $28.07

    The P/S ratio is:

    P/S ratio = Share price / Sales per share

    P/S ratio = $39 / $28.07

    P/S ratio = 1.39 times

    16. a. The current ratio is calculated as:

    Current ratio = Current assets / Current liabilities

    Current ratio2007 = $166,869 / $219,186

    Current ratio2007 = 0.76 times

    Current ratio2008 = $222,608 / $245,856

    Current ratio2008 = 0.91 times

    b. The quick ratio is calculated as:

    Quick ratio = (Current assets Inventory) / Current liabilities

    Quick ratio2007 = ($166,689 104,339) / $219,186 Quick ratio2007 = 0.28 times

    Quick ratio2008 = ($222,608 144,696) / $245,856 Quick ratio2008 = 0.32 times

    c. The cash ratio is calculated as:

    Cash ratio = Cash / Current liabilities

    Cash ratio2007 = $18,288 / $219,186

    Cash ratio2007 = 0.08 times

    Cash ratio2008 = $22,455 / $245,856

    Cash ratio2008 = 0.09 times

    d. The debt-equity ratio is calculated as:

  • Debt-equity ratio = Total debt / Total equity

    Debt-equity ratio = (Current liabilities + Long-term debt) / Total equity

    Debt-equity ratio2007 = ($219,186 + 190,000) / $339,693

    Debt-equity ratio2007 = 1.20

    Debt-equity ratio2008 = ($245,856 + 131,250) / $407,490

    Debt-equity ratio2008 = 0.93

    And the equity multiplier is:

    Equity multiplier = 1 + Debt-equity ratio

    Equity multiplier2007 = 1 + 1.20

    Equity multiplier2007 = 2.20

    Equity multiplier2008 = 1 + 0.93

    Equity multiplier2008 = 1.93

    e. The total debt ratio is calculated as:

    Total debt ratio = Total debt / Total assets

    Total debt ratio = (Current liabilities + Long-term debt) / Total assets

    Total debt ratio2007 = ($219,186 + 190,000) / $748,879

    Total debt ratio2007 = 0.55

    Total debt ratio2007 = ($245,856 + 131,250) / $784,596

    Total debt ratio2007 = 0.48