annual director’s reportisc-mirror.iris.washington.edu/docs/dirreport/2008dr.pdf2008 annual...
TRANSCRIPT
INTERNATIONAL SEISMOLOGICAL CENTRE
2008 Annual Director’s Report
The year 2008 has been a year of the active search for further support, new members of staff and directions of further developments. The Centre received a lot of good publicity. New data, products and services were offered to users. It was a challenging yet successful year.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
2
CONTENTS:
Executive Summary
Staff
Operations
Developments
Projects
Finances
Scientific Liaisons
Citations of the ISC data
Summary of Achievements
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2008 has been a challenging yet a very successful year for the ISC. Through the increased
support from existing and new members and also additional grant secured from the UK
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the ISC’s finances have been substantially improved
from last year with 68% of funding now arriving at the ISC bank account in UK sterling - the
currency in which most of the ISC expenditure occurs.
As a result, two new members of staff were hired to develop existing and new services that
the ISC provides to seismologists and geophysicists worldwide. The ISC building and
computer facilities have been improved.
IASPEI Reference Event List (GT) is now accommodated within the ISC Bulletin and also
distributed by the ISC along with station arrivals.
The total period of the ISC collection of station arrivals has been increased by further four
years by inclusion of the ISS data covering the period 1960-1963.
1652 USArray current and planned sites are included in the International Registry and the
USArray reviewed station picks are now part of the ISC Bulletin. Several other new data sets
were acquired through the year. Current final bulletin collection from networks now stands at
13.4 months behind real time.
In addition, to fill the time gap between seismic event occurrence and corresponding bulletin
publication, the ISC runs the collection of reviewed provisional data from approximately 20
data centres around the world. This information arrives within hours/days/weeks after event
occurrence and being grouped and distributed the next day after submission as part of the
automatic ISC Bulletin.
The delay in the production of the reviewed ISC Bulletin has been eliminated by completing
review of 14.5 months worth of the Bulletin during this year.
Further funds have been raised or committed by new and existing members to allow the ISC
to hire further essential personnel in the coming year to develop the desperately required
interactive bulletin analysis tool and boost a new bulletin data search.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
4
STAFF
OPERATIONS:
James Harris, United Kingdom, System &
Database Administrator
Baokun Li, China, Seismologist / Analyst
Peter Dawson, United Kingdom, Data
Collection Manager, retired in July
Beatriz Vera, Colombia, Seismologist /
Lead Analyst
Przemas Kowalski, Poland, Seismologist /
Analyst, left in Dec
John Eve, United Kingdom, Data
Collection Officer, joined in April
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
5
DEVELOPMENT
István Bondár, Hungary, Senior
Seismologist / Developer, joined in July
Oriol Gaspà Rebull, Spain, Seismologist /
Developer
Juan Benjumea Cadavid, Colombia,
Seismologist / Developer, joined in June
MANAGEMENT&ADMIN
Dmitry Storchak, Russia/United Kingdom,
Director, appointed from Jan 1
Maureen Aspinwall, United Kingdom,
Administration Officer
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
6
OPERATIONS
INTERNATIONAL STATION REGISTRY
Traditionally the ISC maintains the International Seismographic Station Registry (IR)
together with the World Data Center for Seismology, Denver (NEIC). The Registry allocates
globally unique codes to seismic stations and currently has over 16.5 thousand stations
documented. Those
stations that have reported
to the ISC are indicated on
figure 1. The ISC runs a
popular web-page
allowing review of already
registered stations as well
as submission of
parameters required to
register a new station. The
most recent large task was
registration of 1652
stations of USArray.
Valuable assistance has
been received from IRIS
during this process. Over six hundred already operational USArray sites have been fully
registered. Station codes for projected sites of the Transportable Array have been reserved for
future use without specifying exact coordinates. It is likely that during the actual installation
process some sites may be shifted some distance in search for better local geological and
noise conditions. Once re-measured these coordinates will then be fully registered in the IR.
STANDARD BULLETIN DATA COLLECTION
The standard ISC data collection is the collection of final reviewed bulletin data from
approximately 120 different agencies around the world. We continued to reduce the delay in
collection by 2.5 days per month on average. At the end of 2008 it stood at 13.4 months
behind real time with almost all agencies being able to cope with the data delivery schedule.
We plan to stop accelerating the data collection once the schedule reaches the mark of 12
months behind real time.
Half-way through the year the Data Collection Manager has retired. In the expectation of his
retirement, 3 months in advance, the new Data Collection Officer was hired and trained. As
compared to the previous arrangement, the new officer is not involved in programming. All
changes to existing agency-specific parsers and writing parsers for new data has become a
responsibility of existing development staff. The new Data Collection Officer now works
four days a week and proved to be able to cope with the data collection rather well.
Figure 1. Approximately 16,500 seismic stations are currently registered in
the International Seismographic Station Registry (IR) (black dots). This
year 1652 USArray stations have been fully registered (red dots) or
reserved.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
7
Figure 2 shows approximately 120 agencies that routinely report final reviewed bulletin data
to the ISC. Red colour on this figure indicates the dry land territories that are covered by
these reports. It is clear
that further work on
improving the ISC data
collection in Africa,
South America and parts
of Eastern Europe and
Asia is urgently required.
Some territories in
Eastern Europe, although
appear white, in fact are
already covered through
contributions of the
European-Mediterranean
Seismological Centre
(EMSC). Large events with magnitude 4.5-5.0 and above in Africa and South America are of
course reported by the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC), International Data
Centre (IDC) and other agencies.
Starting with data month of July 2006 IRIS DMC began contributing station arrival times that
were picked and reviewed by USArray Array Network Facility in San Diego. The data set
represents a considerable increase in station arrival
numbers associated to already known events in the US
and moderate to large events worldwide. Whilst being
a major source of data for tomographic research, this
data set presents a major challenge to the ISC:
Current ISC location algorithm is not designed
to cope with the bias caused by large concentrations of
seismic stations in specific azimuthal directions
Current ISC Bulletin review procedures are
designed for analysts to review each station arrival.
The increased numbers of stations reporting the same
events present a challenge for the editing team.
Also new bulletin data sets were received from the following institutions:
Geophysical Observatory, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia;
Institute of Geophysics and Geology, Chisinau, Moldova;
Geophysical Survey, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk,
Russia
Figure 2. Approximately 120 agencies around the world (black dots) report
bulletin data to the ISC. Dry land territories covered are in red.
Figure 3. Number of arrival picks
reported by USArray stations for events in
the ISC Bulletin per month.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
8
Centre of Geophysical Monitoring, National Academy of Science, Minsk, Belarus
An important advance has been made by the China Earthquake Networks Center of China
Earthquake Administration (CENC/CEA). In the past earthquake hypocentres and station
arrival data from 24 registered stations were reported separately from each other. As a result
of the joint efforts of colleagues at CENC and the Chinese speaking member of the ISC staff,
CENC is now reporting its data in the ISF format, where hypocentre solutions are followed
by station arrivals. All cases where USGS solutions are adopted for association of Chinese
station arrivals are clearly indicated. Another new advance is the reporting of the un-
associated station readings (out of 24 registered stations) that CENC staff haven’t used for
their bulletin production, yet these data are useful if associated to other events in the ISC
Bulletin.
During the Director’s visit to CEA in October a request to increase the number of reporting
stations was made. We are hoping for a positive outcome to this request.
The ISC data collection mostly runs smoothly, but in a few cases the data collection has been
subject of long and difficult communication with hours, days and weeks spent trying to bring
data that in other times would have arrived effortlessly.
The data from the
CWB (Chinese
Taipei) have been
available to
ISS/ISC since
1930. As a result
of several upgrades
the CWB network
of seismometers
and accelerometers
remains one of the
densest in the
world. Following
an unfortunate
dispute on the
agency name, the
CWB data are now missing from the ISC Bulletin from July 1, 2005 (see figure 4). Long and
slow-moving negotiations are continuing, helped by the Institute of Earth Sciences of
Academia Sinica (IES AS) and China Earthquake Administration. The ISC Director, with the
financial support from IES AS was able to visit CWB on a side trip from 14 WCEE in
Beijing and present the ISC’s point of view and suggestions to relevant officials at CWB. The
ISC is hoping for eventual resolution to this crisis. In the mean time events in the region are
reported by the JMA (Japan), PHIVOLCS (Philippines), IES AS (Chinese Taipei),
Figure 4. Events in the ISC Bulletin before and after 1 July 2005 in the vicinity of
the island of Taiwan.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
9
CENC/CEA (China), NEIC/USGS, IDC/CTBTO and other agencies. The completeness of
the ISC Bulletin in the area has, of course, suffered enormously.
No data for data year 2006 have been received from Saudi Arabia. This was caused by
operational disruptions following the transfer of responsibilities for running the National
Seismic Network of Saudi Arabia from King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology in
Riyadh to Saudi Geological Survey in Jeddah.
The ISC also experienced rather sporadic data submission from National Seismic Network of
Kuwait.
Following the Great Sumatra earthquake, network operations of Badan Meteorologi dan
Geofisica, Indonesia were disrupted, archives lost and normal data contribution stopped. To
compensate for the loss, the ISC now receives automatic alert messages and picks from
stations installed by the GFZ Potsdam for the Indian Ocean Alert System. We also receive
teleseismic picks, rather sporadically, from a network installed with the help from LDG a
number of years ago. Search for new data from the region from networks installed by several
institutions from Japan and China continues.
PROVISIONAL BULLETIN DATA COLLECTION
In 2008 the ISC stepped
up its collection of
provisional bulletin data
from various networks
and data centres. These
data are expected to
undergo at least a
minimal review by local
analysts. Typically these
data include a
provisional hypocentre
location, magnitude
estimate, moment tensor
solution and station
arrival data, though
variations are large from agency to agency. Approximately 20 agencies reported provisional
data to the ISC at the year end (see figure 5).
Provisional hypocentre solutions are being grouped in the ISC database within a day after
receipt and made available through the standard ISC Bulletin search procedure (see figure 6).
For each event an output includes several hypocentre solutions reported by various agencies,
all reported magnitude estimates and station arrival data.
Figure 5. Approximately 20 networks and data centres report provisional
reviewed bulletin data to the ISC.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
10
Figure 6. Provisional hypocentre solutions and made available through the standard ISC Bulletin search
procedure.
By clicking a logo provided for each reporter, the user is re-directed to a corresponding recent
event notification web-page of an agency that provided the original bulletin data (see figure
7). This is an additional service that the ISC provides by giving further publicity to national
networks and data centres involved in the dissemination of information about recent seismic
events locally and on a regional or even global basis.
Figure 7. By clicking logos on the ISC Bulletin page users are re-directed to the original recent event
notification pages of the corresponding reporting agencies.
Figure 8 shows the magnitude distribution of events reported to the ISC within 3 days, 7
days, 1 month and 4 months after event occurrence. It appears from the graph that all events
with magnitude 4.5 and above are reported within a first week. Further reports beyond one
week add information to already reported large and moderate events plus inform about
further smaller events.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
11
This additional initial data collection is intended to fill the gap between the event occurrence
and the time when the final Reviewed ISC Bulletin becomes available. It presents an attempt
to consolidate the effort of many data centres
and networks to make their data available
internationally in good time. Currently the ISC
observes a delay of at least one day before
making these data available. At this stage ISC
does not compute or publish its own event
solutions. This service is not intended to be
used by media or civil protection agencies. It is
indeed designed to be used by seismologists.
Obviously provisional data from agencies are
later substituted with their final bulletin data,
well before the ISC analysts make a final
review of the ISC Bulletin. The ISC
hypocentre solutions are still based on the final
set of bulletin data given by each reporter.
ISC BULLETIN REVIEW
The team of three ISC analysts reviewed 14.5 months worth of the bulletin data in 2008. The
team was helped by the Director during the last steps in the analysis procedure.
Following the ISC Governing Council decision, the ISC has used AK135 velocity model to
compute ISC solutions from data year 2006. These solutions are reviewed by the ISC
analysts. In order to provide consistency with the previous years, an additional set of
automatic ISC locations based on Jeffreys-Bullen travel time tables (coded as ISCJB) is
produced for those events with AK135 solution available. The only ISCJB solutions that are
reviewed are those that show considerable departures from standard ISC locations based on
AK135. Producing two sets of ISC solutions will continue until such a point when the entire
ISC dataset is recomputed with AK135 using currently developed location procedure.
It would be impossible
for the ISC to sustain a
review of every reported
event, so from data year
1999 the data collection
thresholds were removed
and review thresholds
introduced. Following
various recent
improvements this
system continues to
Figure 8. Magnitude distribution of recent events
reported to the ISC within 3 days, 7 days, 1month
and 4 months after event occurrence shown in
shades of grey, the sooner - the darker.
Figure 9. The total number of events in the ISC Bulletin (grey) and the
number of events reviewed by the ISC analysts (red) per year.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
year
19
62
19
65
19
68
19
71
19
74
19
77
19
80
19
83
19
86
19
89
19
92
19
95
19
98
20
01
20
04
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
12
serve its purpose by restricting the number of seismic events to be reviewed by ISC analysts.
Figure 9 shows annual numbers of all seismic events versus the number of events reviewed
by the ISC analysts. The ISC analysts normally review approximately 20% of all events in
the ISC Bulletin. Although most of the Bulletin preparation is done automatically, it is the
analyst’s review that makes the Bulletin accurate and trustworthy. The accuracy of AK135-
based ISC solutions and magnitude estimates, proper grouping of reported information
between the events in the bulletin is under constant scrutiny.
The ISC analysts also
review the correctness of
automatic association of
reported station arrivals
to events, reported
arrival’s phase
identification and travel-
time residuals. As the
number of events stays
the same on average, the
number of associated
arrivals gradually grows
out of control as can be seen on figure 10. The introduction of new data sets, although
beneficial for bulletin users, put an extra strain on the ISC analyst resources. The introduction
of large data sets, especially the USArray have indeed slowed down the review process.
Thus a new approach to the Bulletin review process is required. One of the answers is the
introduction of an interactive editing system in place of the paper-based batch-type analysis.
Also the ISC needs to concentrate on the review of outliers instead of reviewing all data. The
system required will take a long time to design, develop and test in operations. Nevertheless,
it has become so urgent that no expense should be spared. Any delay in the development and
implementation of new software will only worsen the situation with the analyst team
gradually requiring more and more staff to be able to cope with the load and the schedule.
ISC WEB and FTP SERVICES
The ISC web-site as a whole and the Bulletin search in particular continued to grow in
popularity over 2008 (see figure 11). The number of hits (excluding web crawlers) reached
2.2 millions, having increased 55% compared to year 2007. Although the number of Bulletin
searches compared to 2007 went down 50%, the actual amount of Bulletin data taken has
actually doubled to 20 Gb.
Figure 10. The total number of station arrivals in the ISC Bulletin (grey) and
the number of station arrivals reviewed by the ISC analysts (red) per year.
Number of station arrivals in the
ISC Bulletin
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
year
19
62
19
65
19
68
19
71
19
74
19
77
19
80
19
83
19
86
19
89
19
92
19
95
19
98
20
01
20
04
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
13
Figure 11. Number of ISC website hits (grey, left axis) and number of ISC Bulletin searches (red, right axis) per
month.
The most popular services were (in the order of presentation):
International Station Registry (up ten times compared to 2007);
Bulletin search;
Bibliography search (up two times compared to 2007);
Maps using the bulletin search data;
Links to agencies providing real time data;
Search of original contributed to the ISC data;
SKS splitting data.
The statistics of the ISC web-site use per country is shown on figure 12. Although net, gov,
edu and com are the domains mostly registered in the US, they are shown separately. In any
case the US is by far the main user of our services followed by the UK, China, Japan, Greece,
Italy, Russia, France and Germany.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Hits (left axis) Searches (right axis)
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
14
Figure 12. ISC website use per country, percents. Category “Others” includes all users with a share of less
than one percent.
DEVELOPMENTS
ISS DATA (1960-1963)
The ISC data collection
has always included the
hypocentre solutions of
events in the first part of
the 20th
century that were
mostly based on the data
of the ISC’s predecessor
– the International
Seismological Summary
(ISS). Yet the ISC data
users were never able to
acquire the station arrival
data that were available
in a somewhat unusual
United States 19.1
United Kingdom 8.6
net 6.1
China 5.9
Japan 5.5
Greece 4.4Italy 4.3Russia 3.8
gov 3.3
France 3.2
localhost 2.8
com 2.7
Germany 2.5
edu 2.4
Chile 1.9
Turkey 1.3Colombia 1.2
Indonesia 1Canada 1
New Zealand 1
Others 18
Figure 13. Epicentres of seismic events in the International Seismological
Summaries (ISS) for 1960-1963.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
15
form in the paperback
copies of the ISS,
covering a total period
from 1918 till 1963.
This year, thanks to
continuing work of
Antonio Villaseñor of
the Institute of Earth
Sciences ―Jaume
Almera‖ and Bob
Engdahl of Colorado
University, the ISC was
able to introduce to its
database station arrival picks for ISS events in 1960-1963. Various errors in epicentre
information and some missing events were also corrected. Figures 13 and 14 show the
geographical distribution of events for this period of time as well as positions of those
stations that contributed station arrival picks for this events.
The magnitude distribution graph (figure 15)
gives a rough idea of the overall
completeness of the bulletin during this
period of time. The odd high pick at M=3
merely reflects the number of events where
no magnitude estimate is available. One of
the known deficiencies of the ISS data is that
there were no magnitude estimates published,
so that these had to be taken from several
other sources of global and regional data.
As a result of this development the ISC
bulletin data collection grown ―backwards‖ as
opposed to normal growth as years go by. It
now contains station data covering a total
period from 1960 till 2008. It is expected that
further ISS data covering the first part of 20th
century will be made available to the ISC Bulletin users in due course.
IASPEI GT LIST
The International Seismological Centre now maintains the IASPEI database of Reference
Events (earthquakes and explosions) for which epicentre information is known with high
confidence (to 10km or better (GT10)) with seismic signals recorded at regional and/or
teleseismic distances. It should be noted that the depth of these events is not known to the
Figure 14. Positions of seismic stations that contributed arrival data to the
International Seismological Summaries (ISS) in 1960-1963.
Figure 15. Magnitude distribution of events in the
International Seismological Summaries (ISS) in
1960-1963. The large peak at magnitude 3 indicates
events with no magnitude estimate available.
Null
magnitudes
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
16
same level of accuracy as the epicentre. The global effort of collecting and validating GT
events was coordinated by the CoSOI/IASPEI working group on Reference Events for
Improved Location chaired
by Bob Engdahl and Paul
Richards. This database of a
significantly large number
of reference events (over
7,000) and approximately
500,000 station arrivals
facilitates better
visualization of the Earth
structure, better modelling
of velocities of seismic
waves, more accurate travel
time determinations and
increased accuracy of event
locations. ISC users are able
to search this database using a web application and receive GT locations, corresponding ISC
locations along with station arrival data available for each event. A cross-link to the ISC
Bulletin is provided for users to go between ISC and GT databases. A graph on the left shows
comparative numbers of nuclear explosions, chemical explosions and natural seismic events
in each GT category.
Figure 17. Number of nuclear explosions,
chemical explosions and natural earthquakes in
each GT category.
ISC LOCATION PROCEDURES
As described above, the first step in the process of modernizing the ISC location procedures
was the adoption of the AK135 velocity model for computing ISC hypocentres whilst still
Figure 16. Events in the IASPEI list of Reference earthquakes and
explosions. Colours indicate the GT accuracy to which the position of
epicentre of each event is known.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
17
producing locations based on Jeffreys-Bullen travel time tables. At this point there are
approximately 26 thousand events in the ISC Bulletin with both AK135 and JB based ISC
solutions. The mean difference is 5.4km with 90% of the locations within 15 km. A 1.4 s
origin time difference reflects the JB P baseline shift.
The ISC senior seismologist/developer has been working on further modernization of the ISC
location procedures. Several computer bugs have been identified and eliminated. The station
elevation and ellipticity corrections have been reviewed and rectified where necessary. Our
next plans include:
Using phases made available by AK135 such as PKP, core phases and further depth-
sensitive phases including pwP;
Improving relative weighting scheme between phases;
Introducing probabilistic phase identification methods;
Obtaining starting location via Nearest Neighbour Algorithm;
Accounting for correlated model error structure;
Characterizing reading errors by non-Gaussian, skewed and heavy-tailed probability
distributions;
Using measured azimuth and slowness;
Improving magnitude determination procedures.
The following contributions of computer code were received to assist this development:
pwP corrections from E.R. Engdahl;
Nearest Neighbour Algorithm from B.L.N. Kennett and M.S. Sambridge;
Depth phases for improved depth determination from J.R. Murphy and B.W. Barker.
Once the algorithms have been coded, tested, approved by the ISC Governing Council and
put into operation, there is a plan to re-compute the entire ISC data collection from 1960 till
present, using the newly adopted procedures and the AK135 velocity model.
AUTOMATIC WAVEFORM MEASUREMENTS
We also plan to improve the accuracy of the ISC Bulletin by gaining necessary limited
information from the waveforms widely available on-line. A dedicated member of the
development staff has been preparing to carry out experiments on a limited set of stations in
order to:
Measure body-wave amplitudes in accordance with the recommendations of the
IASPEI WG on Magnitude Measurement; based on reported parametric data we often
do not know how amplitudes are measured; consistent amplitude measurements will
improve magnitude determination;
Pick teleseismic depth phases; this will improve our capability to determine accurate
event depths;
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
18
Estimate signal-to-noise ratio; this will facilitate the SNR-based weighting schemes.
It is believed that taking this information consistently using the same technique has a chance
to contribute to the Bulletin in the positive way, even when measurements will be taken
automatically with station-to-station consistency observed.
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES (2009-2011)
A separate document has been prepared by the Director to outline further development
strategies for the next three years. This document has been subject to discussion at the ISC
Executive Committee and the ISC Governing Council. An updated version is available from
the ISC web-site.
PROJECTS
CTBTO-LINK
Following a long and difficult application process, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth
Office (FCO) has awarded the ISC with a three year grant to set up a dedicated and secure
link to the ISC database for the CTBTO PTS and National Data Centres. The UK FCO
agreed to provide 90% of the total required funding (£89,524) on the condition that four other
relevant institutions from Nordic countries were to contribute remaining 10%.
Under this project the ISC will install a dedicated server to hold a mirror version of the ISC
database and create web-based software to query the ISC database in ways specific to the
monitoring community. It is expected that in three years time PTS will consider the
feasibility of supporting maintenance of this system beyond this project.
Effectively the project started only in late Nov 2008 when the first quarterly FCO payment
was received. The server has been purchased, configured and installed. The ISC Director and
Systems and Database Administrator travelled to the IDC to meet colleagues at PTS and
discuss the system configuration and software design. The work on the database mirroring
and software design continues.
It is essential that achievements in almost all aspects of this project will advance the ISC
services to researchers from existing member-institutions.
FINANCES
The detailed financial statements of the ISC for 2008 were audited by Griffins, Chartered
Accountants (Newbury, UK) and approved by Prof. John Woodhouse of the ISC Executive
Committee. These statements present the state of ISC's financial affairs as at 31 December
2008.
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
19
INCOME
In 2008, the ISC had a total income of £ 503,613 from national contributions, UK FCO grant,
sponsorship from Munich Re, the income from selling ISC publications plus interest from the
ISC bank accounts. This amounted to almost 16% more than was budgeted and approved by
the ISC Governing Council. In comparison with 2007, this was a 26% increase in total
income.
In accordance with the decision of the Governing Council, in 2008 the ISC sent invoices to
their members in GBP for the first time. This proved largely successful with the funds being
readily available to spend in the currency our expenses occur giving the ISC greater long-
term stability. Figure 18 shows the dramatic change to parts of the income in 2007 and 2008
denominated in USD, GBP and Euro.
Figure 18. The change in fraction of the overall income paid in US dollars, British
pounds and Euros between 2007 and 2008.
The exchange rate between GBP and USD fluctuated between £1=$1.99 at the start of the
year, to £1=$2 in the middle of the year, and finishing at the end of December at £1=$1.46.
The exchange rate between GBP and Euro fluctuated between £1=1.36€ at the start of the
year, to £1=1.26€ in the middle of the year, and finishing at the end of December at
£1=1.03€. The benefit of invoicing member organizations in British pounds was to reduce
where possible the dependency of the ISC resources from these fluctuations. As a result only
32% of the ISC income in 2008 was subject to these fluctuations compared to 81% in 2007.
During 2008, three more members, each with one unit, joined the ISC Governing Council:
AWE Blacknest, UK
73
2319
68
8 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008
Fra
cti
on
of
ove
rall
in
co
me
, %
USD
GBP
Euro
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
20
Meteorological Organization and Seismology, Ministry of Transport, Iraq
Seismic Research Unit, UWI, Trinidad & Tobago.
Following our request to support new developments at the ISC, eight more units were raised
by existing members generously increasing their contributions:
INGV, Italy increased from 5 units to 9,
NORSAR, Norway - from 1 to 3 units,
Uppsala University, Sweden - from 1 to 2 units.
GFZ, Germany - from 1 to 2 units,
IFREE/JAMSTEC also joined in support of the ISC development with the 2008 membership
payment (5 units) received in January 2009.
First payment of £10,108 from the FCO grant was received to develop a dedicated link to the
ISC database for PTS CTBTO and National Data Centres.
Sponsorship of $5,000 for year 2008 from Munich Re is also expected.
At year-end, after 3 consecutive years the membership fees from the KISR, Kuwait were
unpaid and were written off and 2007 year subscription from KMA, Korea was also written
off.
EXPENDITURE
More than 78% of the ISC expenditure in 2008 was on personnel costs, some £14,780 less
than 2007. During 2008 Dr Dmitry Storchak began his term as Director and Dr Peter
Dawson retired from his position of Data Collection Manager and Developer to be replaced
by Mr John Eve, Data Collection Officer. Mr Juan Benjumea and Dr István Bondár joined
the ISC as Seismologist/ Developer and Senior Seismologist/Developer, respectively. At the
end of the year one of the ISC Bulletin analysts, Mr Przemas Kowalski left the ISC to return
to Poland. The salary costs include: salaries, pension contributions, recruitment and
repatriation of a new and departing staff. The ISC salaries follow the UK academic salary
scales.
Some of the computing expenditure for new machines was paid for from the Computer
Replacement Fund. Travel expenditure in 2008 was £3700 greater than the previous year but
it should be noted that almost all of this travel resulted in either additional data or additional
funding and often both, as well as promotion of the ISC to new audiences.
RESERVES
The gain in income over expenditure for 2008 was £46,673, compared to a loss of £67,869 in
2007. The ISC total reserves, comprising the cash in the bank, building and land, the money
owed to ISC (debtors) minus the money ISC owes (creditors and remaining mortgage on the
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
21
building) increased during 2008 to £414,294. The ISC computer replacement fund has
decreased during 2008 by £6,584 representing purchases made. The ISC has a general reserve
of £362,506, including the cost of the building. This is equivalent to just below 10 month’s
operation of the ISC, which is well within British guidelines for charitable organizations.
CASH FLOW
Figure 19 shows receipts and outlays using dates when transactions were recorded at the bank
and the bank balances with US Dollars and Euros converted to Sterling using the exchange
rate as of the end of each month.
Figure 19. Cash flow.
The ISC has cancelled its £20,000 overdraft facility, as advised by the business manager at
the bank in the knowledge that a new overdraft could be arranged for emergency use if
contributions are delayed.
SCIENTIFIC LIAISONS
The following geophysicists and officials visited ISC premises in Thatcham during the year:
John Woodhouse – University of Oxford, UK
David Jepsen – Geoscience Australia
Matthew Purss – Geoscience Australia
-£100,000
-£50,000
£0
£50,000
£100,000
£150,000
£200,000
£250,000
£300,000
£350,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
TOTAL INCOME TOTAL EXPENDITURE BALANCE
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
22
Steven Taylor – Rocky Mountain Geophysics, US
Dale Anderson – Los Alamos National Laboratory, US
Debbie Fagan – Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US
Brian Kennett – Austrialia National University
Alan Douglas – AWE, Blacknest, UK
Roy Lilwall – AWE, Blacknest, UK
Guy Masters – Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD La Jolla, US
Gary Gibson – Seismic Research Centre, Australia
Jaroslava Plomerová – Czech Academy of Sciences
Oleg Starovoit – Russian Academy of Sciences
John Adams – Geological Survey of Canada
Anthony Hughes – Former Director of the ISC, UK
Richard Benyon – Member of Parliament for Newbury, UK
Often with the help of the hosting institution, the members of the ISC staff visited and, where
appropriate, gave a presentation to members of staff of:
Geophysical Survey, Russian Academy of Sciences (GS RAS), Obninsk, Russia
Laboratory of Geophysics and Seismology, Technological Educational Institute of
Crete, Chania, Greece
European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), Bruyères le Châtel, France
International Data Centre, CTBTO, Vienna, Austria
Laboratoire de Detection et de Geophysique (LDG), CEA, Bruyères le Châtel, France
China Earthquake Administration (CEA), Beijing, China
Institute of Geophysics, CEA, Beijing, China
China Earthquake Networks Center (CENC), CEA, Beijing, China
Hong Kong Observatory (HKO), Hong Kong, China
Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Chinese Taipei
CWB, Chinese Taipei
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), Tokyo, Japan
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED),
Tsukuba, Japan
Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Japan
Members of the ISC staff or the ISC Executive Committee gave talks or presented posters at
the following conferences, meetings and workshops:
Nordic Seismology Seminar, Oslo, Norway
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
23
Seismicity of Northern Eurasia, Obninsk, Russia
IRIS/NSF Workshop on Long-Range Science Plan for Seismology, Denver, USA
European Seismological Commission, Hersonissos, Greece
Royal Society Meeting of UK Learned Society representatives, London, UK
NEIC-ISC-EMSC Coordination Meeting
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China
NEREIS Data Portal for Seismology, brainstorming meeting, Edinburgh, UK
Asian Seismological Commission, Tsukuba, Japan
CITATIONS OF THE ISC DATA in 2008
Plomerova, J., Babuska, V.,Kozlovskaya, E.,Vecsey, L., Hyvonen, L.T. , (2008) Seismic
anisotropy - A key to resolve fabrics of mantle lithosphere of Fennoscandia
Tectonophysics, 462 (1), p.125-136, Dec 2008
Al Marzooqi, Y., Abou Elenean, K.M., Megahed, A.S., El-Hussain, I., Rodgers, A.J., Al
Khatibi, E. ,(2008) Source parameters of March 10 and September 13, 2007, United Arab
Emirates earthquakes, Tectonophysics, 460 (1), p.237-247, Nov 2008
Souriau, A., Chevrot, S., Olivera, C. (2008) A new tomographic image of the Pyrenean
lithosphere from teleseismic data, Tectonophysics, 460 (1), p.206-214, Nov 2008
Radhakrishna, M., Lasitha, S.,Mukhopadhyay, M. (2008) Seismicity, gravity anomalies and
lithospheric structure of the Andaman arc, NE Indian Ocean,
Tectonophysics, 460 (1), p.248-262, Nov 2008
Erduran, M., Endrun, B., Meier, T. (2008) Continental vs. oceanic lithosphere beneath the
eastern Mediterranean Sea — Implications from Rayleigh wave dispersion measurements
Tectonophysics, 457 (1), p.42-52, Sep 2008
Nikolintaga, I., Karakostas, V.
Papadimitriou, E.
Vallianatos, F. (2008) The 2006 Kythira
(Greece), Mw6.7 slab-pull event: tectonic implications and the geometry of the hellenic
wadati-benioff zone Ann. Geof., 51, 823-837
Kiratzi, A. Sokos, E. Ganas, A. Tselentis, A. Benetatos, C. Roumelioti, Z. Serpetsidaki,
A., Petrou, P. (2008) The April 2007 earthquake swarm near Lake Trichonis and
implications for active tectonics in western Greece Tectonophysics, 452 (1), p.51-65, Jun
2008
I. Bondár, and K. L. McLaughlin (2008) A New Ground Truth Data Set For Seismic Studies
Seis. Res. Lett 80: 465-472.
Jean-Luc Chatelain, Bertrand Guillier, and Imtiyaz A. Parvez (2008) False Site Effects: The
Anjar Case, following the 2001 Bhuj (India) Earthquake Seis. Res. Lett, 79: 816 – 819
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
24
Lucia Luzi, Salomon Hailemikael, Dino Bindi, Francesca Pacor, Francesco Mele, and Fabio
Sabetta (2008) ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): A Web Portal for the
Dissemination of Italian Strong-motion Data Seis. Res. Lett, 79: 716 - 722.
Scott Burdick, Chang Li, Vladik Martynov, Trilby Cox, Jennifer Eakins, Taimi Mulder,
Luciana Astiz, Frank L. Vernon, Gary L. Pavlis, and Robert D. van der Hilst (2008) Upper
Mantle Heterogeneity beneath North America from Travel Time Tomography with Global
and USArray Transportable Array Data Seis. Res. Lett, 79: 384 - 392.
Keith D. Koper, Robert B. Herrmann, and Harley M. Benz (2008) Overview of Open Seismic
Data from the North Korean Event of 9 October 2006 Seis. Res. Lett, 79: 178 - 185.
Aiming Lin and Jianming Guo (2008) Nonuniform Slip Rate and Millennial Recurrence
Interval of Large Earthquakes along the Eastern Segment of the Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibet
Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 2866 – 2878
A. L. Stork, N. D. Selby, R. Heyburn, and M. P. Searle (2008) Accurate Relative Earthquake
Hypocenters Reveal Structure of the Burma Subduction Zone Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 2815 –
2827
Lian-Feng Zhao, Xiao-Bi Xie, Wei-Min Wang, and Zhen-Xing Yao (2008) Regional Seismic
Characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean Nuclear Test Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98:
2571 – 2589
Neil D. Selby (2008)Application of a Generalized F Detector at a Seismometer Array, Oct
Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 2469 – 2481
Tomoya Harada and Katsuhiko Ishibashi (2008) Interpretation of the 1993, 2001, and 2002
Guam Earthquakes as Intraslab Events by a Simultaneous Relocation of the Mainshocks,
Aftershocks, and Background Earthquakes Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 1581 - 1587
David S. Brumbaugh (2008) Seismicity and Tectonics of the Blue Ridge Area of the
Mogollon Plateau, Arizona Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 1527 – 1534
R. A. Brazier, Q. Miao, A. A. Nyblade, A. Ayele, and C. A. Langston (2008) Local
Magnitude Scale for the Ethiopian Plateau Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 2341 – 2348
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
25
Ileana M. Tibuleac, David H. von Seggern, John G. Anderson, Kenneth W. Smith, Arturo
Aburto, and Thomas Rennie (2008) Location and Magnitude Estimation of the 9 October
2006 Korean Nuclear Explosion Using the Southern Great Basin Digital Seismic Network as
a Large-Aperture Array Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 756 - 767
Inna Zaslavsky-Paltiel and David M. Steinberg (2008) Comparison of Methods for
Estimating Station Magnitude Corrections for Improved Seismologic Monitoring of the
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 1 - 17
Marco Olivieri, Richard M. Allen, and Gilead Wurman (2008)The Potential for Earthquake
Early Warning in Italy Using ElarmS; Bull. Seis. Soc. Am; 98: 495 - 503
Catherine Dorbath, Jérôme Van der Woerd, Sergei S. Arefiev, Eugene A. Rogozhin, and
Janna Y. Aptekman (2008) Geological and Seismological Field Observations in the
Epicentral Region of the 27 September 2003 Mw 7.2 Gorny Altay Earthquake (Russia) Bull.
Seis. Soc. Am 98: 2849 – 2865
Christian Weidle, Valérie Maupin (2008) An upper-mantle S-wave velocity model for
Northern Europe from Love and Rayleigh group velocities Geophys. J. Int 175, 1154-1168
Ekrem Zor (2008) Tomographic evidence of slab detachment beneath eastern Turkey and the
Caucasus Geophys. J. Int 175, 1273-1282
T. Nicholson, D. Clarke, J. Townend (2008) Regional earthquake location using empirical
traveltimes in a region of strong lateral velocity heterogeneity Geophys. J. Int 175, 560-570
Ping Wang, Maarten V. de Hoop, Robert D. van der Hilst (2008) Imaging the lowermost
mantle (D") and the core–mantle boundary with SKKS coda waves Geophys. J. Int 175, 103-
115
István Bondár, Eric Bergman, E. Robert Engdahl, Ben Kohl, Yu-Long Kung, Keith
McLaughlin (2008) A hybrid multiple event location technique to obtain ground truth event
locations. Geophys. J. Int 175, 185-201
B. Wawerzinek, J. R. R. Ritter, M. Jordan, M. Landes (2008) An upper-mantle upwelling
underneath Ireland revealed from non-linear tomography Geophys. J. Int 175, 253-268
João Carvalho, Taha Rabeh, João Cabral, Fernando Carrilho, Jorge Miguel Miranda (2008)
Geophysical characterization of the Ota–Vila Franca de Xira–Lisbon–Sesimbra fault zone,
Portugal Geophys. J. Int 174, 567-584
M. L. Amaru, W. Spakman, A. Villaseñor, S. Sandoval, E. Kissling (2008)A new absolute
arrival time data set for Europe Geophys. J. Int 173, 465-472
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
26
Sergei Lebedev, Rob D. van der Hilst (2008) Global Upper-mantle tomography with the
automated multimode inversion of surface and S-wave forms Geophys. J. Int 173, 505-518
Keith Priestley, James Jackson, Dan McKenzie (2008) Lithospheric structure and deep
earthquakes beneath India, the Himalaya and southern Tibet Geophys. J. Int 172, 345-362
Sheila Peacock, Alan Douglas (2008)Two-stage rupture of the 1999 Mw 6.0 Southern Lake
Baikal earthquake Geophys. J. Int 172, 302-310
ISC: Annual 2008 Director’s Report
27
SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTS
The delay in production of the Reviewed ISC Bulletin has been eliminated.
1,650 USArray current and planned sites are included in the International Registry.
USArray reviewed picks are accommodated within the ISC Bulletin.
ISC hypocentre and station arrival data collection is increased by further 4 years by
including the 1960-1963 ISS data.
IASPEI Reference Event List (GT) is now accommodated within the ISC Bulletin and
also distributed by the ISC along with station arrivals.
Provisional bulletin data are now collected from approximately 20 data centres around
the world within hours/days after event occurrence, grouped and distributed next day
after submission as part of the automatic ISC Bulletin.
Considerable additional Member’s support secured for further development.
Two new members of development staff have been hired;
Finances substantially improved from last year with further funds raised for the
development of the interactive editing tool and new data search.
ISC building facilities and computer facilities have been improved;
Signed, May 15, 2009
Dr Dmitry A Storchak
Director