analysis of water resources management strategies for the santa ana river watershed region: reuse,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Water Resources Management Strategies for the Santa Ana River Watershed Region:Reuse, Recharge, Use Efficiency
Nathan AdamsHeather AllenAmy BurgardCourtney DietzPo Chi FungKarl Rittger
Advisors: Dr. Arturo Keller and Dr. Robert Wilkinson
DONALD BREN SCHOOL OFENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENTUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA
Presentation Overview
Opportunity Significance Background & Baseline Results Recommendations
SARW = Santa Ana River Watershed
Headwaters of the Santa Ana River
Opportunity
Source: CA State Water Plan, 2005
Statewide Potential Water Suppliesvia Eight Water Resource Management Strategies
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Mill
ion
Acr
e-F
eet
Per
Yea
r
High Estimate
Low Estimate
3.1
2.0 1.4
Goals Use Local & Regional UWMPs to establish
baseline demand & supply projections Identify the potential for alternative water
management strategies in the region. Analyze future water resources scenarios for the
region. Identify barriers to implementation of strategies.
SARW Region - Overview
Significance
Potentially increase local water reliance in the SARW Region by:
Reducing Demand Increasing Local Supply
Water Use Efficiency
AFY AFY
Water Reuse & Recharge
Source: MWD RUWMP, 2005
Demand Drivers
SARW Region Population Projections 2005-2025
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
Year
Po
pu
lati
on
Fullerton
Santa Ana
Anaheim
Eastern
Western
IEUA
MWDOC
SARW Region Population Growth % Projections 2005-2025
9%4%
54%
24%
9%
30%
40%
14%
0%
20%
40%
60%
SARW Region Eastern Western IEUA MWDOC Anaheim Fullerton Santa Ana
% G
row
th 2
005-
2025
SARW Region Demand
Source: MWD RUWMP, 2005.
SARW Region Baseline Total Demand Projections by Sector
790,200838,800
891,500 948,800
754,100
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
AF
Y
Single-Family Multi-Family CII LossesAgriculture GW Recharge Sea Barrier
SARW Region Supply
Source: EMWD, IEUA, MWDOC, WMWD and Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Santa Ana UWMP, 2005.
SARW Region Total Baseline Supply Projections 2005-2025
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
AF
Y
Imported Supplies Local Supplies
Alternative Future Scenarios
Demand Scenarios Baseline – MWD Projections Pacific Institute Efficiency Evapotranspiration (ET) Controller California Appropriate Landscapes (CALscapes)
Supply Scenarios Baseline – Regional UWMP Projections 75% Maximum Reuse / Baseline Recharge 75% Maximum Reuse / Maximum Recharge 95% Maximum Reuse / Maximum Recharge
WASEMWAter Scenario Evaluation Model
Facilitates developing and assessing water demand & supply scenario options
Model used for the State Water Plan 2005
Focus on Water Use Efficiency for the Region
Formation of Demand Scenarios
SectorWater conservation
strategiesMWD Baseline
Scenario Pacific Institute
Efficiency ScenarioET Controller
Scenario CALscape Scenario
Indoor Residential Use
Replace all inefficient appliances and fixtures
11% 32.5% 35.2% 35.2%
Outdoor Residential Use
Improved landscape maintenance and management with efficient irrigation
technologies
0% 27.5% 40.0% 77.0%
Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Use (CII)
Use of cost-effective water use practice and
technology7% 32.5% 37.1% 37.1%
WASEM Demand Projections
CALscape Demand Scenario in 2025 results in: Reduction from baseline = 525,132 AF or 27%
Total Demand - Scenario Projections
1,000,000
1,250,000
1,500,000
1,750,000
2,000,000
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
To
tal D
em
an
d (
AF
Y)
Baseline Demand Pacific Institute ET-Controllers CALscape
27%
Source: AGWA, 2000
Supply Options - Groundwater Recharge
Groundwater currently comprises 36% of total water supply for the SARW Region.
Groundwater Yield & Potential Increase with Conjunctive Use for the SARW Region
832,300
1,019,300
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
Current Operational SafeYield
Safe Yield WithConjunctive Use
Acr
e-F
eet
Supply Options - Reuse
Non-potable reuse Landscape irrigation Agricultural irrigation Industrial cooling Toilet flushing Wetlands enhancement
Indirect potable reuse Recharge groundwater aquifers Surface water reservoir augmentation
Recycled Water Scenarios in 2025
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
2025
AF
Y
Baseline Recycling Scenario
75% Max Recycling Scenario
95% Max Recycling Scenario
Supply Scenario ResultsComparison of Alternative Supply Scenarios to Baseline Supply Scenario
- Normal Year -
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
To
tal S
up
ply
(A
FY
)
Baseline Supply Scenario 75% Max Recycling + Baseline Recharge Scenario
75% Max Recycling + Max Recharge Scenario Max Local Supplies Scenario
11%
Max Local Supplies Scenario in 2025 results in: Increase over baseline = 260,000 AF or 11%
Reduction in Demand (CALscape Demand Scenario)
525,000 AF
+Increase Local Supplies
(Max Local Supplies Scenario)
260,000 AF
=785,000 AF
Potential Reduction in Imports
Approach to Reducing Imports
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply - 330 403 525
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge 45 375 448 570
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge 195 525 598 720
Maximum Local Supplies 260 590 663 785
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply -
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge
Maximum Local Supplies
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply - 330 403 525
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge 45 375 448 570
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge 195 525 598 720
Maximum Local Supplies 260 590 663 785
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply - 330 403 525
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge 45 375 448 570
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge 195 525 598 720
Maximum Local Supplies 260 590 663 785
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- Baseline Demand + Baseline Supply Scenario -
36% 64%
Imported Local Supplies
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge 375
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge
Maximum Local Supplies
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- Pacific Institute Demand Scenario + 75%
Reuse/Baseline Recharge Supply Scenario -
77%23%
Imported Local Supplies
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge 598
Maximum Local Supplies
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- ET Controller Demand Scenario + 75% Reuse/Max Recharge Supply Scenario -
88%
12%
Imported Local Supplies
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply - 330 403 525
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge 45 375 448 570
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge 195 525 598 720
Maximum Local Supplies 260 590 663 785
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
Scenarios Baseline Demand
Pacific Institute
SARW Region - ET Controller
SARW Region - CALscapes
Baseline Supply
75% Max Reuse + Baseline Recharge
75% Max Reuse + Maximum Recharge
Maximum Local Supplies 785
Potential Decrease of Imported Supplies by Scenario (TAF)
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- CALscape Demand Scenario + Max Local
Supply Scenario -
97%
3%
Imported Local Supplies
0%
20%
40%
60%
100% 100%
80%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0%
Baseline Demand + Baseline Supply Scenario
64%
36%
Baseline Scenario
Pacific Institute Demand + 75% Reuse/Baseline Recharge Supply Scenario
77%
23%
Pacific Institute Demand + 75% Reuse/Baseline Recharge Supply Scenario
88%
12%
ET Controller Demand + 75% Reuse/Max Recharge Supply Scenario
ET Controller Demand + 75% Reuse/Max Recharge Supply Scenario
CALscapes Demand + Maximum Supply Scenario
97%
3%
CALscapes Demand + Maximum Supply Scenario
% Local Supplies % Imported Supplies
2025
Maximizing Local Reliance Potential to reduce imports to 3% of total
projected supply in 2025.
Reduction of ~785,000 Acre-Feet of imported water through water Reuse, Recharge, & Use Efficiency management strategies.
Barriers Cost
Costs to develop & implement strategies
Land Use Planning Planning for Purple Pipe
Capitalizing on the Opportunities Education/Awareness
Benefits Reliability $1B in avoided costs Enhancement of local
ecosystems Improvement in local and coastal water quality Reduction of impacts to the Colorado River & SF Bay Delta
Cumulative Avoided Costs of Importing Water into the SARW Region by 2025
$0
$250
$500
$750
$1,000
$1,250
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Year
$ (
Mill
ion
s)
Cumulative Avoided Costs
Colorado River Aqueduct & State Water Project Supplies for MWD
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
Source: MWD 2005 RUWMP
Ac
re F
ee
t/Y
ea
r (A
FY
)
Colorado River Aqueduct
State Water Project
Source: DWR State Water Plan Update 2005
Recommendations Maximize cost-effective urban water use
efficiency technologies & programs Maximize the capture & recharge of stormwater Maximize reuse opportunities Increase regional cooperation between water
agencies
Special thanks to… Our Client: Stephanie Barger, Earth Resources Foundation Dr. Arturo Keller Dr. Bob Wilkinson Dr. John Melack Dr. Mike McGinnis Dr. David Groves Martha Davis, IEUA Rick Whetsel & Peter Vitt, SAWPA The Bren School Faculty and Staff
Thank You!QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?
Case Studies Reuse
Inland Empire Utilities Agency Marin County Water Authority Los Angeles County Sanitation District
Recharge Association of Groundwater Agencies (AGWA) OCWD’s Groundwater Replenishment Project United Water Conservation District in Santa Paula
Use Efficiency Irvine Ranch Water District’s study on Smart Irrigation Controllers Southern Nevada Water Agency’s Xeriscape Program Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s Dual Flush Toilet
Project
Project Approach Background Research
Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs)
2005 State Water Plan Case Studies
Successful strategies Barriers to implementation Solutions to overcome barriers
Formulation of Scenarios Presentation of Scenarios
Demand Supply
RecommendationsIdeas to achieve these
Alternative Futures
Identification & Evaluation of Alternative Futures
Baseline Information
What is the “future” as planned?
How will this “future” incorporate water reuse,
recharge, & use efficiency strategies?
How the Imported Water is Distributed
Source: DWR State Water Plan Update 2005
Wholesaler
Wholesaler
Retailer
- State Water Project -SF Bay Delta
- Colorado River Aqueduct -Colorado River
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD)
Member Agency Water Districts within
SARW Region
Local Municipalities&
Water Purveyors
Presentation of Scenarios
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- CALscape Scenario + Max Local Supply Scenario -
55%
2%
23%
17%
3% 97%
Groundwater Groundwater Reclaimed Recycled Surface Imported
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2025- Baseline -
36% 2%
13%
13%
36% 64%
Groundwater Groundwater Reclaimed Recycled Surface Imported (MWD)
Presentation of ScenariosSARW Region Resource Mix - 2005-2025
- Baseline -
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
AF
Y
Imported Total Local Supplies
SARW Region Resource Mix - 2005-2025- CALscape Scenario + Max Local Supply Scenario -
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
AF
Y
Imported Total Local Supplies
Demand Driver: Single Family HousesSARW Region Single Family House Growth % from 2006-2030
10.7%1.2%
76.7%
60.5%50.3%
2.6% 3.1%
31.8%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Anaheim Fullerton MWDOC SantaAna
Eastern Western IEUA SARWRegion
SF
Ho
me
% G
rwo
th 2
00
6-2
03
0
SARW Region Single Family House Projections 2006-2030
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
SF
Ho
us
es
Anaheim
Fullerton
MWDOC
Santa Ana
Eastern
Western
IEUA
Source: MWD RUWMP, 2005.
Source: MWD RUWMP, 2005.
Supply Options - ReuseRecycled Water Scenarios
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
AF
Y
Baseline Recycling Scenario
75% Max Recycling Scenario
95% Max Recycling Scenario