analysis by doing

8
Bite sized training sessions: Doing Analysis

Upload: damisha-damisha

Post on 27-Sep-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Analysis by Doing

TRANSCRIPT

  • Bite sized training sessions:Doing Analysis

  • Objectives

    Understand the importance of rigorous documentation

    Experiment with selecting the right analytical tool for the right job

  • Inductive VS Deductive AnalysisInduction:

    a method of reasoning from a part to a whole, from particulars to generals, or from the individual to the universal.

    Example: whenever I let go of a hammer, it falls to the ground. Therefore, every time I let go of a hammer it will fall to the ground.

    Deduction:a rigorous proof, or derivation, of one statement (the conclusion) from one or more statements (the premises)i.e., a chain of statements, each of which is either a premise or a consequence of a statement

    occurring earlier in the proof. Example: All fairies are pink. Tinkerbelle is a fairy. Therefore, Tinkerbelle

    is pink.

    Which is better? Thats elementary, Watson.

    Definitions from Encyclopaedia Britannica 2008

  • Yes but how?You should have a range of tools:

    Driver analysis problems, opportunities and standards

    Objectives analysis SMART

    Requirements analysis functional and non-functional

    Scope analysis scope and context

    Process analysis process models and specifications

    Data analysis data models and specifications

  • An exercise in deductive analysis

    The names, not necessarily respectively, of the brakeman, fireman, and engineer of a certain train were Smith, Jones, and Robinson. Three passengers on the train happened to have the same names and, in order to distinguish them from the railway employees, will be referred to hereafter as Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Robinson. Mr. Robinson lived in Manchester; the brakeman lived halfway between Lancaster and Manchester; Mr. Jones earned exactly $20,000 per year; Smith beat the fireman at darts; the brakeman's next-door neighbour, one of the passengers, earned exactly three times as much as the brakeman; and the passenger who lived in Lancaster had the same name as the brakeman.

    How can you prove that the engineer must have been called Smith?

    Deliverables: flipchart presentation that proves the solution is correctwhich will be presented by the other team!

    Time: 60 minutes

    PresenterPresentation Notes1hr 40mins

  • Do what you need to do to do the analysis

    Use whatever tools you like to document the solution

    You could just write out the solution in narrative flow chart or process model it create some custom documentation Venn diagrams Something else!

    Whatever you do, be rigorous and document everything as the other team will be relying on your documentation alone.

  • Questions?

  • Bite sized training sessions: Doing AnalysisObjectivesInductive VS Deductive AnalysisYes but how?An exercise in deductive analysisDo what you need to do to do the analysisQuestions?Slide Number 8