an overview of historical trends related to suspect counterfeit and nonconforming or high risk...
TRANSCRIPT
An Overview of Historical Trends Relating to
Suspect Counterfeit, Non-Conforming and
High Risk Electronic Components
Mark Snider
President, ERAI, Inc.
DMSMS
December 4, 2013
www.erai.com
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
1/28/2014
Introduction to ERAI, Inc.
Founded in 1995, ERAI is an information servicesorganization that monitors, investigates andreports issues affecting the global electronicssupply chain.
ERAI provides tools to mitigate risks onsubstandard parts, counterfeit parts, vendorsand even customers.
Subscribers includeOEMs, CMs, Distributors, OCMs, governmentagencies and industry associations.
Actively involved in a number of committeesand task forces addressing the counterfeitissue.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
2
Today’s Objectives3
Analyze the number of counterfeit incidents vs. the number of reporting entitiesand measure reporting trends.
Evaluate the amount of data collected when sharing data is mandated vs.voluntary.
Assess if counterfeit encounters are or are not on the decline.
Identify the most frequently counterfeit product type.
Confirm who is most likely to report and when.
Compare counterfeit activity against supply chain activity.
Determine if there has been a change in procurement practices by analyzingchanges in the number of counterfeit/nonconforming part escapes againstproduct obsolescence.
Reveal at what level of inspection most nonconforming and suspectcounterfeit parts are identified. © 2013 ERAI Inc.
In June 2007 The US Department
of the Navy, (NAVAIR), asked
the Bureau of Industry and
Security’s Office of Technology
and Evaluation to conduct a
defense industrial base
assessment of counterfeit
electronics.
NAVAIR suspected an increasing
number of counterfeit/defective
parts were infiltrating the DoD
supply chain and sought to
verify and quantify their
suspicions.
BIS Study – June 2007
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
NAVAIR was correct
- Industry leaders ring alarm bells5
January 2002 - ERAI began collecting and publishing counterfeit and
nonconforming part data.
January 2004 - ERAI traveled to China to see first hand the recycling
and refurbishing activities that were fueling the supply of counterfeit
parts.
Late 2004 - US Chamber of Commerce launched the CACP (Coalition
Against Counterfeit and Piracy).
June 2006 - SIA Launched the Anti-Counterfeiting Task Force
October 2006 - IDEA-STD-1010-A Acceptability of Electronic
Components Distributed in the Open Market) published.
Industry leaders were assembling at conferences & symposiums
looking for information and guidance.
Discussions underway within SAE to create a standard to supplement
ISO and AS9100/AS9120 that would specifically address counterfeit
avoidance.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
BIS Data Source & Survey Period7
Survey Period - 2005-2008
Data Source
- 387 companies representing 5 segments of the supply chain
1. 83 OCMS
2. 98 distributors and brokers (45 authorized | 53 unauthorized)
3. 32 circuit board assemblers
4. 121 prime contractors and subcontractors
5. 53 Department of Defense (DoD) agencies
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
What We Discover When Information Sharing Is Not Optional39% encountered counterfeit electronics during the four year period.
8
50% of OCMs encountered
counterfeit parts
26% of DOD agencies
encountered counterfeit parts
55% of distributors encountered
counterfeit parts26% of prime contractors and subcontractors encountered
counterfeit parts 34% of circuit board assemblers encountered
counterfeit parts
Data was collected under authority delegated to the U.S. Departmentof Commerce under Section 705 of the Defense Production Act of
1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. Sec. 2155) and Executive Order
12656.© 2013 ERAI Inc.
29,910 Counterfeit Encounters Reported- BIS Study 2005-2008 | 90% from OCMs
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
3369
7295 74868644
454
750938
613
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2005 2006 2007 2008
OCMs Distributors (AD & ID) Circuit Board Assemblers Prime Contractors DOD
OCM = 26,794
Distributors = 2,755
CB Assemblers = 154
Prime Contractors = 207
DOD = ?
26% (14 out of 53) of the DoD agencies surveyed encountered counterfeits. The incidents were not tracked. The number of
incidents is unknown.
Co
un
terf
eit
Par
tEn
cou
nte
rs
9
Data Source Reporting Comparison- 2005-2008
OCM = 3
Distributors = 3
CB Assemblers = 0
Primes & Subs = 10
(DoD) agencies = 1
OCM = 42 out of 83
Distributors = 54 out of 98
CB Assemblers = 11 out of 32
Primes & Subs = 31out of 121
(DoD) agencies = ?
11
GIDEPBIS Study Period
BISBIS Study Period
While it is likely organizations surveyed by BIS were also Members of GIDEP, unless required to reveal counterfeit
encounters, the data was not willingly shared.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
Data Source Reporting Comparison- 2009-2013
OCM = 3
Distributors = 3
CB Assemblers = 0
Primes & Subs = 10
(DoD) agencies = 1
Other = 1
OCM = 5
Distributors = 27
CB Assemblers = 11
Primes & Subs = 32
(DoD) agencies = 5
Other = 1
12
GIDEP 2005-2008BIS Study Period
GIDEP 2009-2013Post BIS Study Period
58 Counterfeit Encounters
18 Unique Reporting Sources460 Counterfeit Encounters
81 Unique Reporting Sources
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
Why More Data can be Found Within ERAI
17
ERAI’s membership is open to all sectors of the supply chain, without
geographic restrictions, and is not limited to defense and
aerospace.
ERAI’s reporting mechanism does not require the reporting entity to
publicly identify its supplier.
As awareness increases, suppliers deeper within the supply chain
are catching counterfeit and nonconforming parts keeping themout of the hands of top tier Independents that sell directly to
government contractors.
Because of concerns over brand damage, legal
repercussions, unwanted media attention, etc., DoD primes and
sub-primes will likely attempt to flow the responsibility of reporting totheir supplier which may result in fewer GIDEP alerts.
Forthcoming US Government regulations will require DoD and its contractors to report
“counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts” via GIDEP. The
impact these regulations will have on the amount of data captured cannot be predicted.© 2013 ERAI Inc.
Reporting Should not Damage a Company’s
Reputation18
The defense and aerospace industry has
recognized the reporting of counterfeit
part incidents as a key practice to
addressing the counterfeiting threat.
The stigma of being known as a source or
receiver of counterfeit or substandard
parts has been one of the reasons behind
the failure to report such activities.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
1/28/2014
19
Trends cannot be accurately measured without
industry-wide cooperation and participation.
Data sharing is vital to the effectiveness of
ERAI & GIDEP.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
How are Most Counterfeits Identified?- Are Counterfeits Slipping through the Cracks?
It is widely stated that
counterfeiters are evolving their
processes; however, the
incidents being reported to ERAI
and GIDEP are detected using
widely accepted screening
processes like those called out in
AS5553-A, AS6081, CCAP-
101, IDEA-STD-1010-B, etc.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
26
Are more sophisticated counterfeit parts slipping through the cracks?
Counterfeit Detection Methods
Revisions to the ERAI
Nonconforming Parts
Database will provide:
• Standardized language
to be used throughout
the entire supply chain.
• Measurable data set.
• Searchability by
nonconformance type.
• Photo library by
nonconformance type.
• Downloadable
Screening Check list.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
28
Data Trends Conclusions
Counterfeit incidents appear to have a correlation to
market fluctuations.
A decline in the number of active parts being reported
suggests organizations are limiting procurements from
the open market to allocation or obsolescence.
Counterfeit trends are relatively consistent over time.
Data trends can help us with assumptions not
conclusions.
Despite being encouraged to voluntarily report, data is
not being widely shared.
© 2013 ERAI Inc.
29
THANK YOUSend questions and requests for information to:
Follow ERAI on Slideshare
Like ERAI on Facebook
Follow ERAI on Twitter (@ERAI_Inc)
Join- ERAI: Counterfeit Part
Avoidance, Detection, Disposition and Reporting
© 2013 ERAI Inc.