an organic waste management solution a44 urban sustainability fall 2013 18 nov 2013 søren mohr...
TRANSCRIPT
An Organic Waste Management Solution
A44 Urban Sustainability
Fall 2013 • 18 Nov 2013
Søren Mohr Hansen
Joao Faria Vaz Passos
T. Bliss Pierce
Sean Philipp
2
What is the challenge?Design an organic waste management system that can be implemented against the constraints of urban design and funding.
3
Citizens are key stakeholders
“Separation of waste can make people reduce the amount of waste they produce by up to 50%.” Selina Juul, Stop Spild Af Mad
4
Citizens care about the environment
83% believe that organic waste should be composted and/or reused
55%28%
11%
4%
2%
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
5
Citizens want convenient solutions
73% answered that they would sort the waste everytime if it was possible
42%
29%
12%
12%
4%
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
6
Service providers must create a system
“Biogas makes twice as much energy compared to burning the organic waste.” Søren Pihl, Biotrans
“The agriculture can consume all the nutrients that organic waste can provide.” Bruno Sander, Danish Agriculture & Food Council
7
Service systems will reduce waste
“Reusing the organic waste, could reduce the residual waste by 700.000 tons.” Jean Luc Frast, Daka Denmark
9x
8
NGOs are critical partners
“The first thing to solve is the organic waste…then the rest will more or less come by itself.” Nicholas Block, Cradle People
“People tend to think: We pay taxes. It should be taken care of.” Selina Juul, Stop Spild Af Mad
9
Solution: Combine Technologies
• Vacuum System
• Underground Containers
• Separate chute/food waste
• Scaling-up to serve several buildings
• Innovation through a combination
of existing technologies
10
System in an Urban Environment
Source: Wired.com (2010)
11
The Proposed Cycle
Source: Biotrans (2013)
ORGANIC WASTE
12
Implication in Nordhavn
COPEN
HAG
EN
NO
RDH
AVN
Underground
Access points for collection
Low traffic solution on main routes
Container fill levels are monitored
No bins
13
Challenges for the system
COST IMPLEMENTATION
More convenient and lower operating costs than bins
Compromise is needed amongst stakeholders
Lower installation costs than other technologies
Service provider can be created or selected
14
Value Proposition
Closed-loop solution
Strong political momentum
Contributes to the strong branding of CPH
15
Financial Model
Average Fee
Waste Collection
in CPH 10 yearsReduced fee
Savings(goes towards
installation)
Reduced fee
Savings
Outlook
16
CPH
Sundmolen
DK
2012
2030
2050
56.121.662 Kr
301.661 Kr
514 835 200 Kr
2x
340.000.000 DKK
An Organic Waste Management Solution
A44 Urban Sustainability
Fall 2013 • 18 Nov 2013
Søren Mohr Hansen
Joao Faria Vaz Passos
T. Bliss Pierce
Sean Philipp