an example of how the environment may contribute to health disparities: estimates of mortality that...

26
An example of how the environment may contribute to health disparities: Estimates of mortality that could be prevented if Interior and Northern British Columbia had the same air quality as Vancouver Dr. Catherine Elliott 1 and Dr. Ray Copes 2 Canadian Public Health Association Conference June 2008, Halifax, Nova Scotia 1 Community Medicine, University of British Columbia 2 British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Environmental Health Division

Upload: donald-holt

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

An example of how the environment may contribute to health disparities:

Estimates of mortality that could be prevented if Interior and Northern

British Columbia had the same air quality as Vancouver

Dr. Catherine Elliott1 and Dr. Ray Copes2 Canadian Public Health Association Conference

June 2008, Halifax, Nova Scotia1Community Medicine, University of British Columbia

2British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Environmental Health Division

Objectives

• To highlight the concept: environmental health inequity

• To illustrate the differences in ambient fine particulate matter between British Columbia’s Lower Mainland and Interior and Northern communities

• To estimate the mortality attributable to this unequal exposure

Environmental Health Inequity

• Disproportionately high human health outcomes result from inequitable distribution of environmental hazards.

• Includes physical, chemical, biological pollution as well as the built environment

Northridge et al. AJPH 2003;29(2)

Gee and Payne-Sturges 2004

Fine particulate matter

health outcomes

PM2.5PM2.5PM10PM10

70 70 mm70 70 mm

SOURCE: BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Air Resources Branch, 2001.

Distribution of fine particulate matter pollution in British Columbia

Mean Annual PM 2.5 in Northern and Interior BC 2001-2005

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Fort St. John

Kitimat

Terrace

Smithers

Houston

Prince George

Quesnel

Williams Lake

Kamloops

Vernon

Kelowna

Golden

Vancouver

Mean Annual PM 2.5 Concentration 2001-05* (ug/m3)

Methods

• Risk Assessment Approach – to estimate the mortality burden, given the currently available information.

• Mortality attributable to ambient air pollution is estimated based on attributable risk for each increment in PM 2.5 above an a priori low level

Attributable Mortality

• Estimates of attributable mortality are based on:– Measured annual mean PM 2.5 concentration– The reference PM 2.5 that we set– Mortality count in the region– The relationship between mortality and PM

concentration from the literature

Results

Estimated Mortality Attributable to Ambient PM 2.5 above the level in Attainable

(reference exposure level, Vancouver: 5.79 ug/m3)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Fort St. John

Kitimat

Terrace

Smithers

Houston

Prince George

Quesnel

Williams Lake

Kamloops

Vernon

Kelowna

Golden

Vancouver

Mean Annual PM 2.5 Concentration 2001-05* (ug/m3)

0 5 10 15 20 25

Prince George

Vernon

Kelowna

Quesnel

Kamloops

Golden

Williams Lake

Houston

Smithers

Fort Saint John

Terrace

Kitimat

Fort Nelson

Estimated Annual Mortality

Estimated Mortality Attributable to Ambient PM 2.5 above Background

(Terrace as the reference exposure level, 3.39 ug/m3)

0 10 20 30 40 50

KelownaPrince George

KamloopsVernon

QuesnelWilliams Lake

GoldenHoustonSmithers

Fort Saint JohnKitimat

Fort NelsonTerrace

Estimated Annual Mortality

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Fort St. John

Kitimat

Terrace

Smithers

Houston

Prince George

Quesnel

Williams Lake

Kamloops

Vernon

Kelowna

Golden

Vancouver

Mean Annual PM 2.5 Concentration 2001-05* (ug/m3)

Estimate of mortality burden of long-term exposure to ambient air quality

in Northern and Interior BC

Reference Exposure Level

Annual Mortality Central (Low, High)

Interior North

AttainableVancouver (5.79 ug/m3)

32 (5,79) 25 (4,63)

BackgroundTerrace (3.39 ug/m3)

179 (27,443) 53 (8,130)

Annual mortality attributable to PM2.5 compared with other contributing and immediate causes of death

in Northern Health 2001-2005.

Cause of DeathAnnual Mortality

Air pollution 25 (4,63)

Smoking attributable mortality* 319

Alcohol related mortality 168

Cardiovascular disease 297

Stroke/CVA 82

Chronic Pulmonary Disease 73

Diabetes 61

Drug Induced 57

Influenza and Pneumonia 51* Smoking attributable mortality does not include environmental tobacco smoke (second-hand smoke).

Annual mortality attributable to PM2.5 compared with other contributing and immediate causes of death

in Northern Health 2001-2005.

Cause of DeathAnnual Mortality

Air pollution 32 (5,79)

Smoking attributable mortality* 1217

Alcohol related mortality 463

Cardiovascular disease 1415

Stroke/CVA 437

Chronic Pulmonary Disease 283

Influenza and Pneumonia 228

Diabetes 187

Drug Induced 173* Smoking attributable mortality does not include environmental tobacco smoke (second-hand smoke).

Limitations

• Risk Assessment Methodology: provides an estimate of attributable mortality incremental to the reference PM 2.5 concentration.

• We did not include different susceptibilities to particulate matter in our analysis.

Gee and Payne-Sturges 2004

Conclusion

If ambient air pollution were reduced to Vancouver levels, then approximately 57 (range 9-142) deaths each year in the Northern and Interior Health Authorities would be avoided.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Ray Copes, Scientific Director, Environmental Health, BCCDC NCCEH

Dr. Bob Fisk, BC Ministry of Health

Natalie Suzuki, BC Ministry of the Environment

Questions?

End of presentation

Northern and Interior British Columbia

Concentration Response Functions

StudyConcentration Response Function (95% CI)

Six Cities Study, original (Dockery et al 1993) 13 (4.2,23)

Six Cities Study, HEI reanalysis (Krewski et al 2000) 14 (5.4,23)

Six Cities Study, extended reanalysis (Laden et al 2006)

16 (7,26)

ACS, original (Pope et al 1995) 6.6 (3.5,9.8)

ACS, HEI reanalysis (Krewski et al 2000) 7.0 (3.9,10)

ACS, extended reanalysis (Pope et al 2002, 2004) 6.2 (1.6,11)

Values used in this analysisPope et al 2002, 2004; Mean value of six major studies***; Laden et al 2006

Low 1.6Central 10.5High 26

CRFs are expressed as percentage increased mortality per 10ug/m3 increase in PM 2.5

Inversions and trapping

Methods II: Model to derive number of cases

attributable to ambient air pollutionM

ort

alit

y

PM 2.5 (ug/m3)

Concentration Response Function(derived from RR)

Air Quality Standard

Reference exposure level

Measured PM 2.5 level

Number of cases attributable to increase in exposure by 10 ug/m3

PM 2.5 (ug/m3)

Methods II: Model to derive number of cases attributable

to ambient air pollution

A

B

100

104

Mo

rtal

ity

11 21