an evaluation of te poutama tau 2006 presentation to numeracy conference 2007
DESCRIPTION
An Evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2006 Presentation to Numeracy conference 2007. Tony Trinick The University of Auckland Faculty of Education [email protected] Brendan Stevenson Massey University Research Centre for M ā ori Health and Development [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
An Evaluation of Te An Evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2006Poutama Tau 2006
Presentation to Numeracy conference 2007Presentation to Numeracy conference 2007
Tony TrinickTony TrinickThe University of Auckland The University of Auckland
Faculty of EducationFaculty of [email protected]@auckland.ac.nz
Brendan Stevenson Brendan Stevenson Massey UniversityMassey University
Research Centre for MResearch Centre for Māāori Health and Developmentori Health and Development
[email protected]@massey.ac.nz
98
5359
64 65
49 50 52
123
185
152
146 15
5
143
123
115
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
YearLevel
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Year level
Nu
mb
er
2005 (n=496)
2006 (n=1153)
Fig 1. Distribution of Te Poutama Tau students across year levels
Fig 2. Mean stage gains across the number framework
Mean Stage gains
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.22003 (n=1667) 2004 (n=1295) 2005 (n=496) 2006 (n=1153)
Fig 2. Mean stage gains across the number framework
Student Achievement and Year Level-Strategies
Addition 2006
0.98
0.80
0.680.62
0.470.56
0.44
0.89
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
M ultip lication 2006
0.80
0.35
0.67
0.80
0.64 0.61
0.44
0.000
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
Proportions 2006
1.25
0.26
0.54 0.52
0.64
0.80
0.68
1.25
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
FNWS 2006
1.18
0.89
0.690.59
0.420.36
0.28
1.26
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
Student Achievement and year level-knowledge
BNWS 2006
1.14
1.01
0.67 0.65
0.47 0.43
0.26
1.38
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
NID 2006
1.13
0.88
0.64
0.370.31
0.00 0.00
1.48
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
Fractions 2006
0.75
0.64 0.64
0.84
0.66
0.79
0.61
1.00
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
GPPV 2006
0.90
0.580.66 0.69
0.56
0.80
0.59
0.84
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
Basic Facts 2006
1.21
1.08
0.790.87
0.630.67 0.66
0.58
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
Addition 2006
1.36
1.080.97
0.56
0.34
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5
Initial Level
Student Achievement and Initial Stage assessment- strategies
Multiplication 2006
1.10
0.69
0.480.41
0.13
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2-3 4 5 6 7
Initial Level
Proportions 2006
1.25
0.26
0.54 0.52
0.64
0.80
0.68
1.25
0
0.5
1
1.5
0-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year Group
FNWS 2006
2.05
1.57
1.03
0.68
0.32
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5
Initial Level
Knowledge
BNWS 2006
2.10
1.45
1.21
0.71
0.35
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5
Initial Level
NID 2006
2.18
1.73
1.06
0.67
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 1 2 3
Initial Level
Fractions 2006
0.93
0.61 0.56 0.53
0.73
0.000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2-3 4 5 6 7 8
Initial Level
GPPV 2006
1.35
0.86
0.46 0.43 0.45 0.50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0-1 2-3 4 5 6 7
Initial Level
Basic Facts
1.73
1.15
0.81
0.450.35
0.55
0.000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0-1 2-3 4 5 6 7 8
Initial Level
Longitudinal Patterns of ProgressFig 6.1 Final test results 2004-2006 showing mean raw score and equivalent diagnostic test score in parentheses.
Mean Score
2004 (n=1295) 2005 (n=427) 2006 (n=1153)
Initial (level)
Final (level)Initial (level) Final (level)
Initial (level) Final (level)
Strategy Addition 4.1 (4) 4.9 (5) 3.7 (4) 4.2 (4) 3.7 (4) 4.4 (4)
Multiplication 2.1 (4) 2.6 (5) 2.6 (5) 3.2 (5) 2.6 (5) 3.3 (5)
Proportions 2.1 (2-4) 2.4 (2-4) 2.5 (5) 2.9 (5)2.5 (5) 3.1 (5)
KnowledgeFNWS 4.7 (5) 5.5 (6) 4 (4) 4.6 (5)
4.0 (4) 4.8 (5)
BNWS 4.4 (4) 5.3 (5) 4 (4) 4.7 (5) 4.1 (4) 4.8 (5)
NID 3.0 (3) 3.5 (4) 2.9 (3) 3.8 (4) 3.2 (3) 4.3 (4)
Fractions 1.9 (4) 2.3 (4) 2.0 (4) 2.7 (5) 2.0 (4) 2.7 (5)
GPPV
2.9 (4) 3.6 (5)
Basic Facts
3.4 (4) 4.2 (5)