an empirical investigation of ohio’s educator evaluation system (mwera)

15
An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System Authors: Anirudh V.S. Ruhil (Ohio University)< ruhil@ ohio.edu> M arsha S. Lew is(Ohio University)< lew [email protected]> Lauren Porter(The Ohio State University)< porter.700@ osu.edu> Em ily A. Price (Ohio University)< ep311508@ ohio.edu>

Upload: ohio-education-research-center

Post on 25-May-2015

126 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented at the Mid-western Educational Research Association Annual Meeting Nov. 6-9 2013 by Anirudh V.S. Ruhil, Marsha S. Lewis, Lauren Porter, and Emily A. Price

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System

Authors: Anirudh V.S. Ruhil (Ohio University) <[email protected]> Marsha S. Lewis (Ohio University) <[email protected]> Lauren Porter (The Ohio State University) <[email protected]> Emily A. Price (Ohio University) < [email protected]>

Page 2: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

Overview

• Two question motivate our study:– What does Ohio’s educator evaluation system look like?– Any systematic patterns (conditional\unconditional)?

• OTES\OPES • eTPES Data• Analysis and Findings• Conclusions

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 3: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES (2014-2015)

11/08/13

(1) Performance Standards (50%)-- Developed by OH Educator Standards Board-- Seven Components

1: Students2: Content3: Assessment4: Instruction5: Learning Environment6: Collaboration and Communication7: Professional Responsibility and Growth

(2) Student Growth Measures (50%)-- Value-Added-- Approved Vendor Assessments-- LEA Measures

MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 4: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

Student Growth Measures in OTES

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

(A) Value-Added-- Grades 4th – 8th, ELA & Math -- Until June 30, 2014, majority (>25%) of SGM shall be based on Value-Added-- On or after July 1, 2014, all (50%) of SGM shall be based on Value-Added.

(B) Approved Vendor Assessments-- Terra Nova-- ACT End-of Course-- NWEA MAP -- STAR -- …

(C) LEA Measures -- Student Learning Objectives-- Shared Attribution

-- LEA\School-level Value-Added-- LEA\School-level SLO

Page 5: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OPES (2014-2015)

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

(1) Performance Standards

-- Shared vision, establish goals, and continuous improvement-- HQ instruction -> increased student achievement-- Manage resources\operations-- Establish collaborating learning and shared leadership-- Engage parents and community

(2) Student Growth Measures

-- Value-Added-- Approved Vendor Assessments-- LEA Measures

Page 6: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

Student Growth Measures in OPES

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

(A) Value-Added-- School-level Value-Added

(B) Approved Vendor Assessments-- School-level Composite Measure-- School-level Aggregate of AVA scores

(C) LEA Measures-- District SLOs-- District Value-Added-- Aggregate of Teachers’ Value-Added Scores-- Student Achievement Trends-- Progress on Improvement Plans-- Student Course-Taking Trend (e.g., AP)

Page 7: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES\OPES Final Rating Determination

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 8: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES\OPES Data for 2012-2013• OTES – 26 LEAs = 23 PSDs + 1 JVSDs + 2 CSs

• OPES – 27 LEAs = 24 PSDs + 1 JVSD + 2 CSs

• After exclusions for LEAs piloting OTES\OPES we have – 24 LEAs ~ 2,001 Teacher records – 15 LEAs ~ 62 Principal records– These sub-sample sizes drop further once “Exempt” records are excluded

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Ineffective Developing Skilled Accomplished Total

13 (0.6%) 298 (12.8%) 1,580 (67.8%) 441 (18.9%) 2,332 (100%)

Ineffective Developing Skilled Accomplished Total

0 (0%) 22 (12.9%) 98 (57.3%) 51 (29.8%) 171 (100%)

Page 9: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

OTES\OPES Final Summative Ratings

Page 10: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES: Performance Rating by SGM Rating

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 11: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES: Distribution of SGM Ratings Across Performance Standard Ratings

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 12: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES: SGM Category by Rating

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 13: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES: Value-Added Weight by Rating

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 14: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

OTES: SLO Weight by Ratings

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)

Page 15: An Empirical Investigation of Ohio’s Educator Evaluation System (MWERA)

Initial Conclusions

• Value-Added fairly congruent with other evaluation measures• Weight placed on Value-Added seems to be of no consequence for final

summative rating• Our early results in line with NYC (http://bit.ly/16qYVYg) … possibly other

states as well.

• Limitations – Limited data at hand– Potentially biased set of LEAs studied – Value-Added has been well studied; More research is needed for Vendor Assessments &

SLOs– Questions of OTES\OPES reliability are only answerable with multiple waves of data

11/08/13MWERA Annual Meeting 2013 (Evanston, IL)