an electoral tsunami hits italy: 50 provinces washed away ...€¦ · an electoral tsunami hits...
TRANSCRIPT
De Sio L., V. Emanuele, N. Maggini and A. Paparo (eds.), The Italian General Elections of 2013: A dangerous stalemate?, Rome, CISE, 2013ISBN (print) 978-88-98012-10-7 / ISBN (online) 978-88-98012-09-1
An electoral tsunami hits Italy: 50 provinces washed away from PD and PdLMatteo Cataldi and Vincenzo EmanuelePublished in Il Sole 24 Ore, February 27, 2013
The tsunami that came to shore during last Sun-day’s and Monday’s elections was named Beppe Grillo. His exploits were the main novelty of the 2013 elections. With 8,689,000 votes (26.6%) M5S became the first party in Italy at the expense of the PD and PdL. It is unprecedented in the history of Western Europe that a new party obtained such an extreme level of support in its first national elec-tions. In order to find a similar example, we must look back upon the successes of FI in 1994; how-ever, even then, Silvio Berlusconi’s party only ob-tained 21% of the Italian vote. Considering the his-tory of the Italian Republic, it is worth highlighting how similar percentages have only been obtained by the two main parties of the period. In the First Republic, the DC and the PCI were the only parties to reach similar numbers. Only later during the Second Republic, starting after 1992, were FI, the PdL, and the PD able to attain such numbers. The success of M5S in 2013 is therefore a monumental result in Italian politics.
At this point, it is interesting to analyze the ter-ritorial characteristics of Grillo’s success. The map below shows how the territorial distribution has changed looking at the percentage of votes for the leading party in each Italian province. In recent elections, the PD and the PdL dominated the politi-cal scene. In 2008, Berlusconi’s party was victorious in 67 provinces, winning almost everywhere but in the “red zone,” where the PD was strongest. Today, M5S is the party that won the most provinces (50) and also the majority of regions (11). Grillo was hugely successful in Sicily, where his party came in first everywhere but Messina, reaching 40% in Tra-pani and 39% in Ragusa. Grillo’s wave did not just stop on the island, where he had already obtained first place with 15% during the regional elections last October. Instead, he went on to win in many other areas of the country, taking 41 provinces that were previously center-right as well as 9 that were
center-left. Furthermore, M5S was able to win in some regions that were thought to be strongholds of FI and LN, such as the northeast, Cuneo, and western Liguria. It was also victorious in other ar-eas like Marche, Torino, and Genoa, which were previously pro-PD.
The PD, led by Pierluigi Bersani, maintained its traditional strongholds in the “red zone,” where it won with percentages between 30% and 44% in Emilia-Romagna, Umbria, and Tuscany (with the exception of Lucca, ex-enclave of the DC, won by Grillo). In the entire midsouth, Bersani’s party only had the relative majority in three provinces. Interestingly, in Lombardy, the Democrats won al-most everywhere, perhaps taking advantage of the decisive regional bonus in the Senate, benefiting from regional elections and the unusual structure of the election (five parties winning above 10% of the vote and therefore reducing the winners’ quota well below 30%). The exceptions there are Sondrio (LN) and Como (PdL). The latter represents the only province in the midnorth where Berlusconi has the relative majority, whereas five years ago, he had 22. The remaining 16 provinces in which the PdL holds a lead are concentrated in the south, particularly in Apulia and in the provinces of Lazio and Campania.
Grillo’s tsunami has swept away the histori-cal stability of the Italian electoral map,1 where, election after election, the different areas of the country followed similar trends. Only time will tell us if these are temporary changes or if we have witnessed the emergence of new Italian electoral characteristics.
1 On the historical characteristics of the Italian elector-al geography, see the analysis of Dogan [1967], Galli et al. [1968], Corbetta et al. [1988], Caciagli and Spreafico [1990], and Diamanti [2009].
50
Matteo Cataldi and Vincenzo Emanuele
References
Caciagli, M., and Spreafico, A. (eds.) [1990], Vent’anni di elezioni in Italia. 1968–1987, Padova, Liviana editrice.
Corbetta, P., Parisi, A., and Schadee, H. M. A. [1988], Elezioni in Italia—Struttura e tipologia delle consul-tazioni politiche, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Diamanti, I. [2009], Mappe dell’Italia Politica. Bianco, rosso, verde, azzurro e … tricolore, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Dogan, M. [1967], Political cleavage and social stratifica-
tion in France and Italy, in Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives, New York, The Free Press, pp. 129–195.
Galli, G., Capecchi, V., Cioni Polacchini, V., and Sivini, G. [1968], Il comportamento elettorale in Italia, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan, S. [1967], Party systems and vot-er alignments: Cross-national perspectives, New York, The Free Press.
Figure 1. Map of winning parties by province (values are percentages)
Lega nord (1)M5S (50)Pd (40)Pdl (17)altri (2)
44
28
26
29
28
27
32
24
2827
32
28
27
24
32
31
30
30
29
41
41
25
32
34
28
44
26
31
28
25
31
36
27
23
28
25
36
28
26
28
24
28
31
29
22 25
39
32
35
30
29
30
34
26
29
37
24
36
30
40
41
2626
32
27
37
33
25
27
31
32
40
30
30
32
28
26
39
28
33
33
26
3031
24
32
23
34 35
26 29
37
2726
27
23
32
30
27
30
38
3132
33
26
27
30
25
37
38
29
LN (1)
PD (40)M5S (50)
PdL (17)Others (2)
Lega nord (1)M5S (50)Pd (40)Pdl (17)altri (2)
44
28
26
29
28
27
32
24
2827
32
28
27
24
32
31
30
30
29
41
41
25
32
34
28
44
26
31
28
25
31
36
27
23
28
25
36
28
26
28
24
28
31
29
22 25
39
32
35
30
29
30
34
26
29
37
24
36
30
40
41
2626
32
27
37
33
25
27
31
32
40
30
30
32
28
26
39
28
33
33
26
3031
24
32
23
34 35
26 29
37
2726
27
23
32
30
27
30
38
3132
33
26
27
30
25
37
38
29
LN (1)
PD (40)M5S (50)
PdL (17)Others (2)