an automated dual-head infiltrometer for …...of the infiltrometer (cm), b is the infiltrometer...

1
Design & Performance Peristaltic pump for water supply and volume measurement Capacitance probe for depth control Air pressure control to set and change head Hall effect sensor to measure water pump revolutions 3 heavy steel rings for different flow rates Quick connect sealing lid CR3000 Data logger for measurement and control An Automated Dual-Head Infiltrometer for Measuring Field Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Introduction We developed an automated infiltrometer capable of producing variable hydraulic head conditions without actually varying the water depth and without requiring user intervention. This will enable a user to run multiple infiltrometers at one time getting a better quantification of spatial variability. We used the Reynolds and Elrick (1990) and Nimmo et al. (2009) methods of analysis for steady flow from ponded infiltration, in a single ring, which enables us to accurately calculate the saturated hydraulic conductivity (K fs ) of soils in the field. This can replace the method that requires constant monitoring and user intervention to change water levels, and can take hours for the user to complete a single measurement. Pressure Range: -20 to 30 cm H 2 O Flow Rates 20 cm ring Low flow rates 2.5x10 -5 to 9.2x10 -4 cm/sec 15 cm ring Medium low rates 1.48x10 -3 to 4.32x10 -3 cm/sec 10 cm ring High flow rates 2.1x10 -3 to 9.6x10 -3 cm/sec Field results Kahlin Wacker, Gaylon Campbell, and Leo Rivera Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA Corresponding Author [email protected] +1 (509) 332-2756 Figure 3. Cumulative water quantity over time. The slope changes are when the pressure head switches. Figure 4. 10 inch ring on Clay, Shows variability at extreme lower edge of measurable range. * simulated pressure head Figure 5. 4 inch ring on Soccer Field, shows a little variability over long time span. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 high low 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 high low pressure head 4 cm Location K fs Ring Size cm h -1 cm Clay 0.09 20 Clay 0.61 20 Silt Loam 1 2.20 20 Silt Loam 2 3.32 20 Silt Loam Under Grass 5.33 15 Untilled-Structured Silt Loam 15.55 15 Soccer Field 1 18.47 15 Soccer Field 2 7.78 10 Vantage Sand 1 8.14 10 Vantage Sand 2 9.47 10 Soccer Field 3 21.82 10 Soccer Field 4 34.45 10 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 Dual-head Infiltrometer Equations Nimmo et al. (2009) compute the field saturated conductivity from K fs = i/F (1) where i (cm/s) is the steady (final) infiltration rate (volume divided by area) and F is a function that corrects for sorptivity and geometrical effects. F is computed from F = 1 + (l+D)/D (2) where D is the ponding depth (cm), d is the insertion depth of the infiltrometer (cm), b is the infiltrometer radius (cm), and l (cm) is the reciprocal of the Gardner a which is a characteristic of the soil and its initial water content. Equations 1 and 2 are originally from Reynolds and Elrick (1990). D in eq. 2 is 0.993d + 0.578b. If we know infiltration rate at two ponding depths we can eliminate l using equations 1 and 2, written for the two depths, to get K fs = D(i 2 – i 1 )/(D 2 – D 1 ) (3) D is a constant for a particular size infiltrometer. For our infiltrometers d = 5 cm and b = 5, 7.5 or 10 cm, so D = 7.85, 9.3 or 10.7 cm. The hydraulic conductivity is therefore just the infiltration rate difference divided by the ponding depth difference multiplied by delta. The infiltration rate is the flow (cm 3 /s) divided by the infiltrometer area. The areas for our infiltrometers is 79, 177 or 314 cm 2 . Infiltration Rate, cm 3 /min Cumulative Infiltration, cm 3 Infiltration Rate, cm 3 /min Figure 2. Testing infiltration on the soccer field. Figure 1. Internal layout of infiltrometer. On left is original prototype with data logger. On right is second edition with purpose built board. Table 1. Table of infiltration rates for 12 different locations. 15 minute increments 15 minute increments 1 minute increments References Nimmo, J. R., K. M. Schmidt, K. S. Perkins and J. D. Stock. 2009. Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization. Vadose Zone J. 8:142-149. Reynolds, W. D. and D. E. Elrick. 1990. Ponded infiltration from a single ring. I. Analysis of stead flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am J. 54:1233- 1241 pressure head 24 cm* pressure head 24 cm* pressure head 4 cm

Upload: others

Post on 03-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Automated Dual-Head Infiltrometer for …...of the infiltrometer (cm), b is the infiltrometer radius (cm), and l (cm) is the reciprocal of the Gardner a which is a characteristic

Design & Performance •Peristaltic pump for water supply and volume measurement •Capacitance probe for depth control •Air pressure control to set and change head •Hall effect sensor to measure water pump revolutions •3 heavy steel rings for different flow rates •Quick connect sealing lid •CR3000 Data logger for measurement and control

An Automated Dual-Head Infiltrometer for Measuring Field Saturated

Hydraulic Conductivity

Introduction We developed an automated infiltrometer capable of producing variable hydraulic head conditions without actually varying the water depth and without requiring user intervention. This will enable a user to run multiple infiltrometers at one time getting a better quantification of spatial variability. We used the Reynolds and Elrick (1990) and Nimmo et al. (2009) methods of analysis for steady flow from ponded infiltration, in a single ring, which enables us to accurately calculate the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs ) of soils in the field. This can replace the method that requires constant monitoring and user intervention to change water levels, and can take hours for the user to complete a single measurement.

Pressure Range: -20 to 30 cm H2O Flow Rates 20 cm ring Low flow rates 2.5x10-5 to 9.2x10-4

cm/sec

15 cm ring Medium low rates 1.48x10-3 to 4.32x10-3cm/sec

10 cm ring High flow rates 2.1x10-3 to 9.6x10-3cm/sec

Field results

Kahlin Wacker, Gaylon Campbell, and Leo Rivera Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA

Corresponding Author [email protected]

+1 (509) 332-2756 Figure 3. Cumulative water quantity over time. The slope changes are when the pressure head switches.

Figure 4. 10 inch ring on Clay, Shows variability at extreme lower edge of measurable range. * simulated pressure head

Figure 5. 4 inch ring on Soccer Field, shows a little variability over long time span.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

high

low

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

high

low pressure head 4 cm Location Kfs Ring Size

cm h-1 cm Clay 0.09 20

Clay 0.61 20

Silt Loam 1 2.20 20

Silt Loam 2 3.32 20

Silt Loam Under Grass 5.33 15

Untilled-Structured Silt Loam 15.55 15

Soccer Field 1 18.47 15

Soccer Field 2 7.78 10

Vantage Sand 1 8.14 10

Vantage Sand 2 9.47 10

Soccer Field 3 21.82 10

Soccer Field 4 34.45 10

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81

Dual-head Infiltrometer Equations Nimmo et al. (2009) compute the field saturated conductivity from Kfs = i/F (1) where i (cm/s) is the steady (final) infiltration rate (volume divided by area) and F is a function that corrects for sorptivity and geometrical effects. F is computed from F = 1 + (l+D)/D (2) where D is the ponding depth (cm), d is the insertion depth of the infiltrometer (cm), b is the infiltrometer radius (cm), and l (cm) is the reciprocal of the Gardner a which is a characteristic of the soil and its initial water content. Equations 1 and 2 are originally from Reynolds and Elrick (1990). D in eq. 2 is 0.993d + 0.578b. If we know infiltration rate at two ponding depths we can eliminate l using equations 1 and 2, written for the two depths, to get Kfs = D(i2 – i1)/(D2 – D1) (3) D is a constant for a particular size infiltrometer. For our infiltrometers d = 5 cm and b = 5, 7.5 or 10 cm, so D = 7.85, 9.3 or 10.7 cm. The hydraulic conductivity is therefore just the infiltration rate difference divided by the ponding depth difference multiplied by delta. The infiltration rate is the flow (cm3/s) divided by the infiltrometer area. The areas for our infiltrometers is 79, 177 or 314 cm2.

Infiltra

tio

n R

ate

, cm

3/m

in

Cu

mu

lative

In

filtra

tio

n, cm

3

Infiltra

tio

n R

ate

, cm

3/m

in

Figure 2. Testing infiltration on the soccer field.

Figure 1. Internal layout of infiltrometer. On left is original prototype with data logger. On right is second edition with purpose built board.

Table 1. Table of infiltration rates for 12 different locations.

15 minute increments

15 minute increments 1 minute increments

References Nimmo, J. R., K. M. Schmidt, K. S. Perkins and J. D. Stock. 2009. Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization. Vadose Zone J. 8:142-149.

Reynolds, W. D. and D. E. Elrick. 1990. Ponded infiltration from a single ring. I. Analysis of stead flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am J. 54:1233-1241

pressure head 24 cm*

pressure head 24 cm*

pressure head 4 cm