zephyr estates - suisun city, california...state route (sr) 12/highway 12is a four-lane divided...
Post on 02-Mar-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Transportation May 12, 2014
Zephyr Estates Draft Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for City of Suisun City
Zephyr Estates Draft Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for City of Suisun City May 12, 2014
Approved by Jeffrey Chan, PTP
Prepared by Carol Shariat, TE
Reviewed by Anthony Mangonon
Zephyr Estates
1 May 30, 2014
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Study Scope and Approach ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Transit Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Conditions................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Traffic Conditions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.4.1 Level of Service Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4.2 Signal Warrants ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.3 Existing Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.4.4 Existing Intersection LOS and Signal Warrant Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 10
3.0 Cumulative (2030) Conditions ................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Cumulative (2030) Transportation Network .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Cumulative (2030) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Cumulative (2030) Intersection LOS and Signal Warrant Analysis ................................................................................................. 13
4.0 Project Travel Demand .............................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................................................... 16
4.1.1 Pass-by Trip Generation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1.2 New Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 19
4.2 Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 Mode Choice ............................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.4 Trip Assignment .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20
5.0 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 22 5.1 Criteria for Determining Significance of Effects ........................................................................................................................... 22 5.2 Existing plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................................................................. 23
5.2.1 Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 23 5.2.2 Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts ................................................................................................................. 26
5.3 Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 29 5.3.1 Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts ...................................................................................................... 29 5.3.2 Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts ................................................................................................. 32
6.0 Transportation Mitigation and Improvement Measures ............................................................ 36 6.1 Existing plus Project .................................................................................................................................................................... 36
6.1.1 Traffic (with Walters Road driveway) ................................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.1.2 Traffic (without Walters Road driveway) .............................................................................................................................................................. 36
6.2 Cumulative (2030) plus Project .................................................................................................................................................... 37 6.2.1 Traffic (with Walters Road driveway) ................................................................................................................................................................... 37 6.2.2 Traffic (without Walters Road driveway) .............................................................................................................................................................. 37
List of Figures Figure 1: Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2: Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................... 4
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
1.0 Introduction 2
Figure 3: Existing No Project Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometry ......................................... 12 Figure 4: Cumulative (2030) Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometry........................................... 15 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution ..................................................................................................... 21 Figure 6: Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Intersection Traffic Volumes and
Geometry ................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 7: Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Intersection Traffic Volumes and
Geometry ................................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 8: Cumulative plus Project with Walters Road driveway Intersection Traffic Volumes and
Geometry ................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 9: Cumulative plus Project without Walters Road driveway Intersection Traffic Volumes and
Geometry ................................................................................................................................... 34
List of Tables Table 1: Intersection Level of Service Definitions................................................................................ 9 Table 2: Intersection Level of Service – Existing Conditions ............................................................. 11 Table 3: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) Conditions .............................................. 14 Table 4: Unadjusted Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................... 17 Table 5: Internal Trip Reduction Summary ........................................................................................ 17 Table 6: Total Adjusted Trip Generation ............................................................................................ 18 Table 7: Estimated Pass-by Trips ..................................................................................................... 19 Table 8: New Project Trip Generation ................................................................................................ 19 Table 9: Intersection Level of Service – Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions
.................................................................................................................................................. 24 Table 10: Intersection Level of Service – Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway
Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 28 Table 11: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway
Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 30 Table 12: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road
driveway Conditions .................................................................................................................. 33
Appendices A: Intersection Counts B: Intersection Level of Service Calculations and Signal Warrant Summary
Zephyr Estates
1 May 12, 2014
1.0 Introduction This analysis has been conducted to assess the potential transportation impacts associated with the proposed Zephyr Estates mixed-use development located within the City of Suisun City, herein referred to as the “Project”. The following transportation topics were addressed:
• Transit conditions; • Pedestrian conditions; • Bicycle conditions; • Traffic conditions; and • Site access and circulation.
1.1 Project Location The Project would be generally located south of East Tabor Avenue, east of Walters Road, and west of Charleston Street within the City of Suisun City. The Project location and vicinity is illustrated in Figure 1. 1.2 Project Description The Project is located on approximately 8.6 acres. The Project would consist of 59 single-family residential lots and 17,000 square feet of commercial development. Access to the Project site would be from either Walters Road, East Tabor Avenue, or Charleston Street. The access points off of Walters Road and Charleston Street would only allow for right-in/right-out movements. The access point off of East Tabor Avenue allows for all ingress and egress movements. The Project site plan is illustrated in Figure 2. 1.3 Study Scope and Approach This transportation study was prepared according to the scope of work approved by City of Suisun City Community Development Department staff. The following scenarios were evaluated to identify the potential transportation-related impacts of the Project:
• Existing (2014) No Project Conditions; • Existing (2014) plus Project Conditions; • Cumulative (2030) No Project Conditions; and,
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
1.0 Introduction 2
• Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions.
Existing and Cumulative overall peak hour traffic conditions were evaluated at the intersections that would most likely be impacted by the Project based on locations where the Project would add a majority of the Project-related trips. Traffic conditions at the intersections were analyzed during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, defined as the peak hours of the weekday AM and PM peak periods (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, respectively). The study intersections were selected for analysis, in consultation with the City of Suisun City Community Development Department staff. The intersections located outside of Suisun City within a different jurisdiction are indicated in parentheses after the intersection name. The following five intersections were selected for evaluation:
1. Air Base Parkway / Walters Road (City of Fairfield); 2. Tabor Avenue / Walters Road (City of Fairfield); 3. Tabor Avenue / Charleston Street (City of Fairfield); 4. Gunter Drive / Walters Road; and, 5. Highway 12 / Walters Road-Lawler Ranch Parkway (Caltrans).
The location of the five selected study intersections surrounding the Project are illustrated in Figure 1.
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
12
12
80
5
1
2
3
4
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Air Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Cordelia Sl ough
Union Creek
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
NORTHFEET
0 40002000
Base Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlasG10110076 007 SAC GRX
Vicinity MapFigure 1
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
LegendInterstate/State HighwayStreetsCity of Suisun BoundaryStudy IntersectionProject Site
1
ProjectLocationProjectLocation
1116
22
6 7 8 9
1415171819
21
10
20
1213
23
53
54
5556 57
Street A Street B
Street B
Stre
et C
28
35
4029
24
25
26
2730
31
32
3336
37
38
39
3452
49
51
50
48
41
42 43 44 4645 47
5923 145
58
CH
AR
LES
TON
ST.
WAL
TER
S R
OAD
CA
RS
WE
LL L
N
EAST TABOR AVE
Residential = 59 Lots
PROJECT SUMMARY
Commercial Parking = 58 Stalls (1:250)Commercial Parcel = 1.50 Acres
• 54 Standard Spaces (9'x18')
• 4 ADA Van Accessible SpacesNORTHFEET
0 15075
G10110076 005 SAC GRX
Project Site PlanFigure 2
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
Zephyr Estates
5 May 12, 2014
2.0 Existing Conditions This chapter provides a description of the existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the Project. Included in this chapter are descriptions of the existing roadway, transit, pedestrian and bikeway networks, and documentation of the existing traffic conditions. 2.1 Roadway Network The Project area is served by the following roadways: State Route (SR) 12/Highway 12 is a four-lane divided expressway with paved shoulders west of Walters Road. East of Walters Road, SR 12 narrows to two-lanes wide with paved shoulders and classified as a rural major arterial by Solano County. The posted speed limit along the roadway is 50 miles per hour (mph). SR 12 provides access to Suisun City via the Civic Center Drive interchange, and at signalized intersections with Marina Boulevard, Sunset Avenue-Grizzly Island Road, Emperor Drive-Lawler Ranch Parkway, and Walters Road-Lawler Ranch Parkway. Air Base Parkway is an east-west expressway between I-80 and Travis Air Force Base. West of I-80, Air Base Parkway is also known as Waterman Boulevard. East of Walters Road, Air Base Parkway is a four-lane divided roadway with paved shoulders and Class II bike lanes1 are provided along both sides of the roadway. West of Walters Road, Air Base Parkway is a four-lane divided roadway with paved shoulders. Pedestrians are prohibited on Air Base Parkway west of Walters Road. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. Walters Road is a north-south arterial running between Huntington Drive and SR 12. Walters Road becomes Lawler Ranch Parkway south of SR 12. In the vicinity of the Project site, Walters Road is four-lanes wide divided by a raised median with Class II bike lanes on both sides of the roadway south of Tabor Avenue. No parking is allowed along both sides of the roadway. Walters Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and would provide access to the Project site. Tabor Avenue begins in the City of Fairfield at Pennsylvania Avenue and ends just east of Charleston Street. East of Walters Road, Tabor Avenue is two-lanes wide with Class II bike lanes on both sides of the roadway. West of Walters Road, Tabor Avenue is two-lanes wide with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. No parking is allowed along both sides of the roadway. Tabor Avenue would provide access to the Project site.
1 Class II bike lanes provide a restricted right‐of‐way, and are designated for the use of bicycles with a striped lane on a street or highway.
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
2.0 Existing Conditions 6
Charleston Street is a north-south collector running between Tabor Avenue and Bella Vista Drive. Charleston Street is two-lanes wide with Class II bike lanes on both sides of the roadway. No parking is allowed on either side of the roadway. Charleston Street would provide access to the Project site. Gunter Drive is an east-west collector which runs between Walters Road and Charleston Street. Gunter Drive is two-lanes wide with Class II bike lanes provided along both sides of the roadway. No parking is allowed on either side of the roadway. 2.2 Transit Conditions Fairfield and Suisun Transit (FAST) operates four local and one intercity route through Suisun City. Route 2 operates closest to the Project site with bus stops located at the northeast corner of the Walters Road / Tabor intersection and at the southeast corner of the Walters Road / Granada Drive intersection. Route 2 operates Monday through Saturday with 30-minute headways during the peak commute time periods. 2.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Conditions Bicycle facilities are classified as Class I, II, or III. Bike paths (Class I) provide a completely separate right-of way and are designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians. Bike lanes (Class II) provide a restricted right-of-way, and are designated for the use of bicycles with a striped lane on a street or highway. Bike routes (Class III) provide for a right-of-way designated bike signs or pavement markers for shared use with pedestrians or motor vehicles. Class I bike paths include the Central County Bikeway that runs along the north side of SR 12 between Walters Road and the train station. There is currently a Class II bicycle facility (bike lanes) along Walters Road, Charleston Street, Gunter Drive, Air Base Parkway, and Tabor Avenue.
Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street in many portions of the study area. Crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided at most intersections within the study area. 2.4 Traffic Conditions This section discusses the methodology used to analyze the study facilities and the existing traffic operations of the study facilities.
Zephyr Estates
7 May 12, 2014
2.4.1 Level of Service Methodology Level of Service is a qualitative indication of the level of delay and congestion experienced by motorists. Levels of Service are designated by the letters A through F, with A corresponding to the lowest levels of congestion and F corresponding to the highest level of congestion. According to the City of Suisun City General Plan Circulation and Transportation Element Goal 1, the City strives to maintain LOS E or better on public streets. However, this standard only applies to the intersection of Walters Road / Gunter Drive as it is within the City’s jurisdiction. The following presents the LOS standards for the study intersections within other jurisdictions. The following intersections are under the jurisdiction of the City of Fairfield hence, the City of Suisun City LOS standards do not apply:
• Tabor Avenue / Walters Road; • Walters Road / Air Base Parkway; and, • Charleston Street / Tabor Avenue.
According to the City of Fairfield General Plan Circulation Element, a LOS standard of “D” or better is to be maintained during the PM peak hour for arterial streets and LOS C or better for collector streets. Since at least one of the two streets that creates the intersection of the first two intersections listed above is an arterial, the applicable LOS standard is “D”. Charleston Street is considered a collector and thus, the acceptable LOS for the intersection of Charleston Street / Tabor Avenue is LOS C or better. The intersection of Walters Road / Highway 12 is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans. Caltrans standards for interchange ramp terminal intersections or other state route intersections are typically consistent with the subject local jurisdiction’s standards, which may include a city or county, as well as a Congestion Management Agency. The intersection is within Suisun City and thus, a LOS standard of E will be applied to the intersection. The analysis methodology for signalized and unsignalized intersections is described below. Signalized intersections For signalized intersections, the analysis uses the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. The 2000 HCM methodology determines the capacity of each lane group approaching the intersection. The LOS is then based on average delay (in seconds per vehicle) for the various movements within the intersection. A combined weighted average delay and LOS are then presented for the intersection.
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
2.0 Existing Conditions 8
It should be noted that signalized intersections operating at LOS F with delays above 80 seconds per vehicle are typically reported as “greater than 80 seconds per vehicle,” as 80 seconds is generally considered the limit of the meaningful range for the analysis methodology. Unsignalized Intersections At an unsignalized intersection, most of the main street traffic is undelayed, and by definition have acceptable conditions. The main street left-turn movements and the minor street movements are all susceptible to delay of varying degrees. Generally, the higher the main street traffic volumes, the higher the delay for the minor movements. The 2000 HCM methodology for analysis of unsignalized intersections calculates an average total delay per vehicle for each minor street movement and for the major street left-turn movements, based on the availability of adequate gaps in the main street through traffic. A LOS designation is assigned to individual movements (or to combinations of movements in the case of shared lanes) based upon delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS reported herein is based on the average delay (in seconds per vehicle) for all approaches for an all-way stop-controlled intersection or the worst approach for a one- or two-way stop-controlled intersection. It is typical for some of the minor street movements at unsignalized intersections to have LOS E or F conditions while the major street movements have LOS A, B, C, or D conditions. In such a case, the minor street traffic experiences delays that can be substantial for individual minor street vehicles, but the majority of vehicles using the intersection have very little delay. Usually in such cases, the minor street traffic volumes are relatively low. If the minor street volume is large enough, improvements to reduce the minor street delay may be justified, such as channelization, widening, or signalization. It should be noted that unsignalized intersections operating at LOS F with delays above 50 seconds per vehicle are typically reported as “greater than 50 seconds per vehicle,” as 50 seconds is generally considered the limit of the meaningful range for the analysis methodology. Level of Service definitions for signalized and unsignalized intersections are included in Table 1.
Zephyr Estates
9 May 12, 2014
Table 1: Intersection Level of Service Definitions
LOS Description Average Delay (sec / veh)
Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
A Little or no delay < 10.0 < 10.0 B Short traffic delay > 10.0 and < 20.0 > 10.0 and < 15.0 C Average traffic delay > 20.0 and < 35.0 > 15.0 and < 25.0 D Long traffic delay > 35.0 and < 55.0 > 25.0 and < 35.0 E Very long traffic delay > 55.0 and < 80.0 > 35.0 and < 50.0 F Extreme traffic delay > 80.0 > 50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Notes: Delay in seconds per vehicle. For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches (all-way stop control) or the worst approach (one- or two-way stop control).
2.4.2 Signal Warrants At each unsignalized intersection, the potential need for a traffic signal was evaluated. Traffic signal warrants are a series of standards that provide guidelines for determining if a traffic signal is appropriate. Signal warrant analyses are typically conducted at intersections of uncontrolled major streets and stop sign-controlled minor streets. If one or more signal warrants are met, signalization of the intersection may be appropriate. However, a signal should not be installed if none of the warrants are met, since the installation of signals would increase delays on the previously uncontrolled major street, and may increase the occurrence of particular types of accidents. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (2012 Edition) by Caltrans was used as a reference for the signal warrant analysis. As stated in the 2012 MUTCD, “An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location. The investigation of the need for a traffic control signal shall include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the study location and the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following traffic signal warrants:
• Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume; • Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume;
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
2.0 Existing Conditions 10
• Warrant 3, Peak Hour; • Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume; • Warrant 5, School Crossing; • Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System; • Warrant 7, Crash Experience; and, • Warrant 8, Roadway Network.
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.” This traffic impact analysis did not evaluate the full panoply of warrants for traffic signals, but instead focused on the peak hour warrant. The MUTCD states that, “This [peak hour] signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.” The Peak Hour Warrant No. 3 in the MUTCD is being used in this impact analysis study as an “indicator” of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed the peak hour warrant are considered (for the purposes of this impact analysis) to be likely to meet one or more of the other signal warrants (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). Even if the Peak Hour Volume Warrant is met, it is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. 2.4.3 Existing Traffic Volumes The existing traffic volume levels in the vicinity of the Project were determined by collecting weekday AM peak period (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) turning movement counts at the study intersections. The traffic counts were collected on Tuesday, February 25, 2014 while area schools were in session. The existing AM and PM peak hour intersection volumes and lane geometry are shown on Figure 3. Intersection count data is provided in Appendix A. 2.4.4 Existing Intersection LOS and Signal Warrant Analysis Table 2 presents the summary LOS results for the study intersections under Existing Conditions. These results indicate that all the study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Detailed LOS analysis and worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Zephyr Estates
11 May 12, 2014
Table 2: Intersection Level of Service – Existing Conditions
Intersection Traffic
Control Type
Existing Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS
Standard LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd Signal D D 49.9 C 34.8 2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd Signal D B 18.8 C 20.5 3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd OWSC E B 11.5 B 10.3 4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd Signal E B 17.4 C 27.5 5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St OWSC C A 9.3 A 8.7
Source: AECOM, 2014. Notes: OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Existing Conditions show that none of the unsignalized intersections meet the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during either the AM or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
1
Walt
ers R
d?Air Base Pkwy? S
8 (17)367 (1016)
207 (659)
103 (99)937 (415)241 (254)
317 (
209)
134 (
148)
623 (
361)
75 ( 9
4)50
( 115
)4 (
5)
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
115 (154)357 (283)1 (4)
197 (423)
246 (420)34 (82) 99
( 39)
111 (
59)
2 (0)
391 (
350)
24 ( 6
4)11
3 (12
7)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
104 (53)59 (11)11 (4)
190 (151)27 (17)59 (72)
89 ( 7
8)75
4 (52
5)1 (
3)
106 (
258)
340 (
703)
38 ( 7
7)
3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
6 (2)
824 (
593)
7 (16
)
427 (
798) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
54 (120)
175 (
58)
Existing No Project IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 3
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 006 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Zephyr Estates
13 May 12, 2014
3.0 Cumulative (2030) Conditions Cumulative (2030) Conditions evaluates conditions expected in Year 2030, including planned and approved development growth and transportation network changes in the study area, as well as background growth throughout the region. The Cumulative Conditions are used as a future baseline against which to compare Cumulative plus Project Conditions, in order to identify long-term Project-related impacts. 3.1 Cumulative (2030) Transportation Network The analysis of Cumulative (2030) Conditions assumed a few improvements to the roadway network. Consistent with other traffic studies in the study area, the following roadway improvements were assumed under Cumulative (2030) Conditions:
• Walters Road would be extended north where it would meet with Cement Hill Road, which is considered part of the planned Jepson Parkway. Jepson Parkway would be a four-lane arterial which would align primarily along existing roadways to serve intercity trips between Suisun City, Fairfield, and Vacaville; and,
• An exclusive through lane would be added to the northbound and southbound approaches of the Walters Road / Air Base Parkway intersection.
3.2 Cumulative (2030) Traffic Volumes The cumulative analysis was performed for a horizon year of 2030 in order to reflect foreseeable growth within the area. Forecasts of future year traffic volumes were prepared using the Solano Transportation Authority’s (STA) Solano / Napa travel demand model. Existing traffic volumes were adjusted using factors based on existing counts, base-year model forecast link volumes, and future-year model forecast link volumes. An annual growth factor for traffic was developed between the 2030 model link volumes and the 2010 base year model link volumes and applied to existing traffic volumes. The weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and lane configurations at the study intersections under Cumulative (2030) Conditions are shown in Figure 4. 3.3 Cumulative (2030) Intersection LOS and Signal Warrant Analysis Table 3 summarizes the LOS results for the study intersections under Cumulative (2030) Conditions. These results indicate that all of the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels, except for the intersection of Air Base Parkway / Walters Road during both the AM and PM peak hours.
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
3.0 Cumulative (2030) Conditions 14
Table 3: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) Conditions
Intersection Traffic
Control Type
Cumulative (2030) Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS
Standard LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd Signal D F >80 F >80 2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd Signal D C 32.2 D 46.6 3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd OWSC E B 12.4 C 16.4 4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd Signal E D 38.0 E 75.6 5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St OWSC C A 9.7 A 8.8
Source: AECOM, 2014. Notes: OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
Detailed LOS analysis and worksheets are provided in Appendix B. The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Cumulative (2030) Conditions show that none of the study intersections meet the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during the AM or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
190 (770)470 (880)10 (40)
420 (460)
690 (700)120 (290)
310 (
160)
190 (
110)
30 (2
0)
310 (
620)
70 ( 2
00)
570 (
300)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
170 (50)50 (20)20 (10)
290 (480)20 (30)
90 (110)
130 (
190)
840 (
1310
)10
( 10)
380 (
360)
890 (
1310
)70
( 70)
3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
7 (2)
980 (
1510
)9 (
20)
1000
( 143
0) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
100 (110)
240 (
80)
1
Walt
ers R
d?Air Base Pkwy? S
30 (130)720 (1250)
640 (470)
460 (570)660 (1000)
270 (360)38
0 (36
0)62
0 (74
0)38
0 (78
0)
720 (
350)
480 (
790)
90 ( 4
0)
Cumulative (2030) IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 4
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 008 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
3.0 Cumulative (2030) Conditions 16
4.0 Project Travel Demand This chapter provides an estimate of the travel demand that would be generated by the Project. There are four steps in the travel demand forecasting process:
• Trip generation – Given the land use program for a specific area, the travel demand forecasting process must estimate how many total trips the area will generate;
• Trip distribution – Given the number of trips for a specific area, the travel demand forecasting
process must estimate the origins and destinations of these trips; • Mode choice – Given the trip distribution, the travel demand forecasting process must
estimate the number of trips expected on each of the available travel modes serving the area; and,
• Trip assignment – Given the distributed trips by mode, the travel demand forecasting process
must predict the routes that people making these trips will select, resulting in traffic forecasts for specific elements of the roadway system and ridership forecasts for the transit services.
4.1 Trip Generation Trip generation relates land uses to the number of persons or vehicles entering or exiting the site. The trip generation for the Project was based on the provided land use information using standard trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation (9th Edition). Trip generation estimates from the ITE’s Trip Generation are based on a sample of trip generation studies at sites across the United States, for each land use provided. An average trip generation rate is then calculated, which can be used to estimate vehicle trips generated by land use. In cases where the sample is of sufficient size, a regression analysis is also conducted to derive a linear or logarithmic equation that relates land use size to trips generated. The unadjusted trip generation for the proposed Project is presented in Table 4.
Zephyr Estates
17 May 12, 2014
Table 4: Unadjusted Project Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size
(D.U., KSF)
Vehicle Trips
Daily Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210)(1)
59 d.u. 562 33 11 44 37 22 59
Specialty Retail (826) 17.0 ksf 753 56 60 116 20 26 46
TOTAL -- 1,315 89 71 160 57 48 105
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, 2012. Notes: d.u. = dwelling units. KSF = 1,000 square feet.
A methodology defined in the Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition was used to obtain the internal trips as shown in Table 5. Table 6 details the total “adjusted” trip generation for the proposed project which takes into account the internal trips made within the project site.
Table 5: Internal Trip Reduction Summary
Land Use (ITE Code) Size
(D.U., KSF)
Vehicle Trips
Daily Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210)(1)
59 d.u. 75 3 5 8 3 2 5
Specialty Retail (826) 17.0 ksf 75 5 3 8 2 3 5
TOTAL -- 150 8 8 16 5 5 10
Source: Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, 2004. Notes: d.u. = dwelling units. KSF = 1,000 square feet.
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
4.0 Project Travel Demand 18
Table 6: Total Adjusted Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size
(D.U., KSF)
Vehicle Trips
Daily Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210)(1)
59 d.u. 487 8 28 36 34 20 54
Specialty Retail (826) 17.0 ksf 678 51 57 108 18 23 41
TOTAL -- 1,165 59 85 144 52 43 95
Source: AECOM, 2014. Notes: d.u. = dwelling units. KSF = 1,000 square feet. Total Adjusted Trip Generation = Unadjusted Trip Generation – Internal Trip
4.1.1 Pass-by Trip Generation Total project trips, as shown in Table 4, are comprised of both new “primary project trips” and “pass-by trips.” Pass-by trips are not new trips, but are trips that would otherwise be on the adjacent street for another purpose and stop at a land use as a matter of convenience. For example, a pass-by trip would occur when a vehicle which normally traverses Walters Road from work to home stops at the proposed site for food, shopping, etc. A reduction must be made to the “total” project trips to account for pass-by trips. Information from the Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition was used to establish reasonable pass-by trip reductions. Table 7 details the “pass-by” Project trips which are assumed would be drawn to the proposed Project from existing traffic volumes on adjacent roadways.
Zephyr Estates
19 May 12, 2014
Table 7: Estimated Pass-by Trips
Land Use (ITE Code) Pass-by
Reduction
Pass-by Trips
Daily1 Weekday AM Peak Hour1
Weekday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Specialty Retail (826) 34% 0 0 0 0 7 7 14
Source: Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, 2004. Notes: d.u. = dwelling units. KSF = 1,000 square feet. 1No pass-by reductions for the daily and AM peak hour per ITE guidance.
4.1.2 New Project Trip Generation “New Project trip generation” (total adjusted Project trips minus pass-by trips) are the new trips being generated by the Project, and do not include pass-by trips which already exist on the roadways and takes into account the internal trips made within the Project site. The proposed Project is projected to generate a total of 1,165 new Project daily trips, 144 of which would occur during the weekday AM peak hour and 81 of which would occur during the weekday PM peak hour. Table 8 details the new Project daily and weekday peak hour trip generation.
Table 8: New Project Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size
(D.U., KSF)
Vehicle Trips
Daily Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210)(1)
59 d.u. 487 8 28 36 34 20 54
Specialty Retail (826) 17.0 ksf 678 51 57 108 11 16 27
TOTAL -- 1,165 59 85 144 45 36 81
Source: AECOM, 2014. Notes: d.u. = dwelling units. KSF = 1,000 square feet. New Project Trip Generation = Total Adjusted Trip Generation – Pass-by Trips
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
4.0 Project Travel Demand 20
4.2 Trip Distribution To evaluate the traffic related effects of the Project, trips that would be generated by the Project were distributed onto the roadway network. Trip distribution simulates the geographical pattern of travel, matching trips generated by one type of land use (e.g. residential) with trips generated by other types of land uses (e.g., education, employment, and shopping). The distribution of trips associated with the Project was derived from the STA Solano / Napa regional travel demand forecasting model, observations of travel patterns near the site, and knowledge of the proposed access locations associated with the Project. The model zone within which the Project is located was isolated and its peak hour trips were assigned to the network. From this selected zone assignment, the trip distribution was estimated. Trip distribution patterns to and from the Project are shown in Figure 5. 4.3 Mode Choice Trips generated by the proposed Project can be expected to be split amongst the auto, transit, walk, and bicycle modes of travel. The transit, walk, and bicycle trips are expected to be much less than the share of vehicle trips given the general nature of the study area. To ensure a conservative approach for the traffic analysis, the mode split is assumed to be 100 percent auto trips with an average vehicle occupancy (AVO) of one person per car. 4.4 Trip Assignment New project trips were assigned to the roadway network and study intersections from the Project access points located off of Walters Road, Tabor Avenue, and Charleston Street based upon the trip distribution patterns described above. New primary trips were assigned to the study intersections and the Project access points after considering the origin and destination of vehicles.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Peab
ody R
dPe
abod
y Rd
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek2 5
3
4
1
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
35%30%
5%
5%5%
15%15%
10%10%
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 009 SAC GRX
LegendProject SiteSuisun City BoundaryMajor RoadsStreetsStudy IntersectionTrip Distribution
15%5%
Project Trip DistributionFigure 5
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 22
5.0 Impact Analysis This section examines potential Project impacts to Existing and Cumulative Conditions. Analyses were conducted to determine the Project’s potential impacts to traffic facilities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit facilities, and Project site access and circulation. 5.1 Criteria for Determining Significance of Effects The following significance criteria in accordance with Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, of the CEQA Guidelines, for the determination of transportation impacts associated with the Project were utilized. A Project is considered to have a significant effect if it would:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit; or
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to
level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways; or
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in substantial safety risks; or
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment); or
e) Result in inadequate emergency access; or
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance of safety of such facilities. In the context of checklist item a), the following quantitative thresholds will be used: Would the project:
Zephyr Estates
23 May 12, 2014
• Cause a study intersection found within the jurisdiction of Suisun City that presently operates at LOS E or better to degrade to LOS F, or cause an increase in intersection delay for those intersections that presently operate at LOS F.
• Cause an arterial study intersection found within the jurisdiction of Fairfield that presently
operates at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or F, or cause an increase in intersection delay by five or more seconds for those intersections that presently operate at LOS E or F.
• Cause a collector study intersection found within the jurisdiction of Fairfield that presently
operates at LOS C or better to degrade to LOS D, E, or F, or cause an increase in intersection delay by five or more seconds for those intersections that presently operate at LOS D, E, or F.
In the context of checklist item b), the following criteria will be used:
• Cause a study intersection found within Caltrans jurisdiction that presently operates at LOS E or better to degrade to LOS F, or cause an increase in intersection delay for those intersections that presently operate at LOS F.
The proposed Project would not create additional airplane traffic or alter existing air traffic patterns. No further analysis is required. Therefore, this issue is not evaluated further in this traffic study. 5.2 Existing plus Project Conditions To develop the Existing plus Project traffic conditions, the traffic generated by the proposed Project is added to existing traffic volumes. Existing plus Project Conditions are compared relative to Existing Conditions to determine the potential impacts due to the proposed Project. The following presents traffic impacts for two Existing plus Project traffic scenarios, with and without the Walters Road driveway. 5.2.1 Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts Project-generated traffic volumes were added to existing traffic volumes to obtain the Existing plus Project traffic volumes. These traffic volumes reflect the assumptions stated earlier regarding trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and traffic assignment for the proposed Project. Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 6.
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 24
Table 9 summarizes the LOS results for the study intersections and the access point driveways under Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions. The results show that all of the study intersections and access point driveways would continue to operate acceptably, within the acceptable LOS standard for each intersection. Therefore, Project-generated vehicular traffic would not result in a significant impact to traffic operations. Detailed LOS analysis and worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Table 9: Intersection Level of Service – Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control
Type
Existing Conditions Existing plus Project
Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd Signal D 49.9 C 34.8 D 54.3 D 35.3
2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd Signal B 18.8 C 20.5 B 19.8 C 22.0
3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd
OWSC B 11.5 B 10.3 B 11.7 B 10.4
4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd
Signal B 17.4 C 27.5 B 17.6 C 27.6
5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St OWSC A 9.3 A 8.7 A 9.3 A 8.7
A Walters Rd / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 11.6 B 10.3
B Tabor Ave. / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 10.2 A 9.5
C Charleston St. / Project Dvwy OWSC -- -- -- -- A 8.6 A 8.9
Source: AECOM, 2014. OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
A C
B
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
1
Walt
ers R
d?
Air Base Pkwy? S
8 (17)367 (1016)
225 (673)
103 (99)937 (415)262 (270)
347 (
222)
134 (
148)
649 (
372)
75 ( 9
4)50
( 115
)4 (
5)
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
118 (156)357 (283)1 (4)
206 (430)
246 (420)34 (82) 99
( 39)
111 (
59)
2 (0)
404 (
355)
24 ( 6
4)11
7 (12
9)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
121 (63)62 (12)28 (15)
190 (151)30 (19)59 (72)
90 ( 7
8)79
3 (54
1)1 (
3)
106 (
258)
340 (
699)
76 ( 1
10) 3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
9 (4)
836 (
602)
7 (16
)
444 (
805) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
62 (126)
178 (
60)
B
Tabor Ave
Proje
ctDr
ivewa
y
A
ProjectDriveway
Walt
ers R
d
427 (
786)
40 (17)
830 (
592)
15 ( 1
4)
C
ProjectDriveway
Char
leston
St
178 (
60)
7 (3)7 (
5)56
( 121
)
37 ( 2
3)2 (
1)175 (58)3 (2)
73 (102)35 (30)
Existing Plus Project with Walters Road Driveway IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 6
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 013 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 26
The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions show that none of the unsignalized intersections meets the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during the AM or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B. 5.2.2 Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts Project-generated traffic volumes were added to existing traffic volumes to obtain the Existing plus Project traffic volumes. These traffic volumes reflect the assumptions stated earlier regarding trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and traffic assignment for the proposed Project. Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 7. Table 10 summarizes the LOS results for the study intersections and the access point driveways under Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions. The results show that all of the study intersections and access point driveways would continue to operate acceptably, within the acceptable LOS standard for each intersection. Therefore, Project-generated vehicular traffic would not result in a significant impact to traffic operations. Detailed LOS analysis and worksheets are provided in Appendix B. The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions show that none of the unsignalized intersections meets the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during the AM or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
B
A
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
1
Walt
ers R
d?
Air Base Pkwy? S
8 (17)367 (1016)
225 (673)
103 (99)937 (415)262 (270)
347 (
222)
134 (
148)
649 (
372)
75 ( 9
4)50
( 115
)4 (
5)
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
118 (156)357 (283)1 (4)
206 (430)
246 (420)34 (82) 99
( 39)
111 (
59)
2 (0)
404 (
355)
24 ( 6
4)11
7 (12
9)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
143 (72)63 (13)28 (15)
190 (151)30 (19)59 (72)
89 ( 7
8)77
1 (52
9)16
( 17)
106 (
258)
340 (
699)
76 ( 1
10) 3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
26 (11)
836 (
602)
7 (16
)
444 (
805) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
62 (126)
178 (
60)
A
Tabor Ave
Proje
ctDr
ivewa
yB
ProjectDriveway
Char
leston
St
178 (
60)
23 (10)7 (
5)56
( 121
)
60 ( 3
2)2 (
1)175 (58)3 (2)
73 (102)49 (45)
Existing Plus Project without Walters Road Driveway IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 7
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 014 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 28
Table 10: Intersection Level of Service – Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control
Type
Existing Conditions Existing plus Project
Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd
Signal D 49.9 C 34.8 D 54.3 D 35.3
2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd
Signal B 18.8 C 20.5 C 20.4 C 22.5
3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd
OWSC B 11.5 B 10.3 B 11.9 B 10.4
4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd
Signal B 17.4 C 27.5 B 17.6 C 27.6
5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St
OWSC A 9.3 A 8.7 A 9.3 A 8.7
A Tabor Ave. / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 10.5 A 9.6
B Charleston St. / Project Dvwy
OWSC -- -- -- -- A 8.6 A 8.9
Source: AECOM, 2014. OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
5.2.3 Hazards Impact The Project’s site access and circulation can be seen in Figure 2. Three access points would provide access to both the residential and commercial development and connect with Walters Road, Tabor Avenue, and Charleston Street, creating three new unsignalized intersections. New roadways and public roadways would adhere to roadway design standards set forth by Suisun City. As such, new roadways would be consistent with City standards for residential and commercial developments. In general, all new roadways and public roadways would be constructed such that they would not increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
Zephyr Estates
29 May 12, 2014
intersections due to inadequate sight distance) and ensures public safety. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant. 5.2.4 Emergency Access Impact The vehicular circulation system also serves to provide adequate emergency access by providing multiple access points to both the residential and commercial development. Each home or the commercial land use can be accessed by at least two access points. Thus, if one access point is blocked, the other access point could be used by emergency vehicles to reach any residential home or the commercial development. In addition, the width of the access points and internal roadways would conform to the design standards set forth by the City. The project would provide sufficient emergency vehicle access and therefore, this impact is considered less than significant. 5.2.5 Alternative Modes Impact The Project would not eliminate or reduce existing bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities on Walters Road, Tabor Avenue, or Charleston Street. Sidewalks are proposed along the local streets within the residential development which would promote a safe condition for pedestrians. In addition, the Project is not anticipated to conflict with any policies, programs, or programs supporting alternative transportation modes. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant. 5.3 Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions are compared relative to Cumulative (2030) Conditions to determine the potential cumulative impacts due to the proposed Project. The following presents traffic impacts for two Cumulative plus Project traffic scenarios, with and without the Walters Road driveway. 5.3.1 Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts Project-generated traffic volumes were added to cumulative traffic volumes to obtain the Cumulative (2030) plus Project traffic volumes. These traffic volumes reflect the assumptions stated earlier regarding trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and traffic assignment for the proposed Project. Cumulative plus Project with Walters Road driveway AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 8. Table 11 summarizes the LOS results for the study intersections under Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions. The results show that all of the study intersections
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 30
are forecasted to operate acceptably, except for the intersection of Walters Road / Air Base Parkway during the AM and PM peak hours. The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions show that none of the unsignalized intersections meets the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during the AM peak hour or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Table 11: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control
Type
Cumulative Conditions Cumulative plus Project
Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd
Signal F >80 F >80 F >80 F >80
2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd
Signal C 32.2 D 46.6 C 34.5 D 47.3
3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd
OWSC B 12.4 C 16.4 B 12.5 C 16.6
4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd
Signal D 38.0 E 75.6 D 38.9 E 77.2
5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St
OWSC A 9.7 A 8.8 A 9.7 A 8.8
A Walters Rd / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 12.5 C 15.7
B Tabor Ave. / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 11.0 A 9.7
C Charleston St. / Project Dvwy
OWSC -- -- -- -- A 8.8 A 8.8
Source: AECOM, 2014. OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
A C
B
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
193 (772)470 (880)10 (40)
429 (467)
690 (700)120 (290)
310 (
160)
190 (
110)
30 ( 2
0)
323 (
625)
70 ( 2
00)
574 (
302)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
187 (60)53 (21)37 (21)
290 (480)23 (32)
90 (110)
131 (
190)
879 (
1326
)10
( 10)
380 (
360)
890 (
1306
)10
8 (10
3) 3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
10 (4)
992 (
1519
)9 (
20)
1017
( 143
7) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
108 (116)
243 (
82)
1
Walt
ers R
d?
Air Base Pkwy? S
30 (130)720 (1250)
658 (484)
460 (570)660 (1000)291 (376)
410 (
373)
620 (
740)
406 (
791)
720 (
350)
480 (
790)
90 ( 4
0)
B
Tabor Ave
Proje
ctDr
ivewa
y
A
ProjectDriveway
Walt
ers R
d
1017
( 143
7)
40 (17)
987 (
1507
)15
( 14)
C
ProjectDriveway
Char
leston
St
243 (
82)
7 (3)7 (
5)10
2 (11
1)
37 ( 2
3)2 (
1)240 (80)3 (2)
107 (115)35 (30)
Cumulative Plus with Walters Road Driveway Project IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 8
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 012 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Transportation Impact Analysis City of Suisun City
5.0 Impact Analysis 32
The following is a description of the intersection that would operate unacceptably under Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions. The intersection is evaluated for the significance criteria in Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions. When significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures needed to remove or reduce the impact to an acceptable level are described in the following section. Walters Road / Air Base Parkway The addition of Project-related traffic to Cumulative Conditions would cause the intersection to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours. Project-related traffic would add more than 5 seconds of intersection delay and degrade operating conditions at this intersection during the AM peak hour. Therefore, this impact would be significant. 5.3.2 Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Traffic Impacts Project-generated traffic volumes were added to cumulative traffic volumes to obtain the Cumulative (2030) plus Project traffic volumes. These traffic volumes reflect the assumptions stated earlier regarding trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and traffic assignment for the proposed Project. Cumulative plus Project without Walters Road driveway AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 9. Table 12 summarizes the LOS results for the study intersections under Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions. The results show that all of the study intersections are forecasted to operate acceptably, except for the following intersections:
• Walters Road / Air Base Parkway during the AM and PM peak hours; and, • Tabor Avenue / Walters Road during the PM peak hour.
The results of the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant analysis under Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions show that none of the unsignalized intersections meets the MUTCD peak hour signal warrant during the AM peak hour or PM peak hour. Detailed peak hour signal warrant sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Zephyr Estates
33 May 12, 2014
Table 12: Intersection Level of Service – Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control
Type
Cumulative Conditions Cumulative plus Project
Conditions Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour Weekday AM
Peak Hour Weekday PM
Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
1 Air Base Pkwy / Walters Rd
Signal F >80 F >80 F >80 F >80
2 Tabor Ave / Walters Rd
Signal C 32.2 D 46.6 D 36.6 E 60.2
3 Gunter Dr / Walters Rd
OWSC B 12.4 C 16.4 B 12.8 C 16.9
4 Highway 12 / Walters Rd
Signal D 38.0 E 75.6 D 38.9 E 79.1
5 Tabor Ave / Charleston St
OWSC A 9.7 A 8.8 A 9.7 A 8.8
A Tabor Ave. / Project Dvwy.
OWSC -- -- -- -- B 11.3 A 9.9
B Charleston St. / Project Dvwy
OWSC -- -- -- -- A 8.9 A 8.9
Source: AECOM, 2014. OWSC = One-way stop control. Delay presented in seconds per vehicle. For unsignalized intersections, average delay represents the worst approach (one-way stop-control). For signalized intersections, average delay represents the average of all approaches. Bold indicates intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS.
Olive
Ave
Olive
Ave
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Walt
ers R
dW
alter
s Rd
Char
lesto
n St
Char
lesto
n St
Prosperity LnProsperity Ln
E. Tabor AveE. Tabor Ave
Pintail DrPintail Dr
Air Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base PkwyAir Base Pkwy
Gunter DrGunter Dr
Lawler Ranch PkwyLawler Ranch Pkwy
12
12
Petersen RdPetersen Rd
Mc Coy Cre
ek
2 5
3
4
1
B
A
TRAVISAIR FORCE
BASE
4
Walt
ers R
dLa
wler
Ran
ch P
kwy?
Highway 12? S
193 (772)470 (880)10 (40)
429 (467)
690 (700)120 (290)
310 (
160)
190 (
110)
30 ( 2
0)
323 (
625)
70 ( 2
00)
574 (
302)2
Walt
ers R
d?
Tabor Ave? S
209 (69)54 (22)37 (21)
290 (480)23 (32)
90 (110)
130 (
190)
857 (
1314
)25
( 24)
380 (
360)
890 (
1306
)10
8 (10
3) 3
Walt
ers R
d
Gunter Dr?
27 (11)
992 (
1519
)9 (
20)
1017
( 143
7) 5
Char
leston
St?
Tabor Ave.
108 (116)
243 (
82)
1
Walt
ers R
d?
Air Base Pkwy? S
30 (130)720 (1250)
658 (484)
460 (570)660 (1000)291 (376)
410 (
373)
620 (
740)
406 (
791)
720 (
350)
480 (
790)
90 ( 4
0)
A
Tabor Ave
Proje
ctDr
ivewa
yB
ProjectDriveway
Char
leston
St
243 (
82)
23 (10)7 (
5)10
2 (11
1)
60 ( 3
2)2 (
1)240 (80)3 (2)
107 (115)49 (45)
Cumulative Plus Project without Walters Road Driveway IntersectionTraffic Volumes and Lane Geometry
Figure 9
Zephyr EstatesTransportation Impact Analysis
NORTHBase Map: City of Suisun City, CalAtlas
FEET
0 20001000
G10110076 011 SAC GRX
Legend
S
1
0 (0)
Project SiteTraffic LanesAM(PM) Peak Hour VolumesStudy IntersectionStop SignSignal
Zephyr Estates
35 May 12, 2014
The following is a description of the intersection that would operate unacceptably under Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions. The intersection is evaluated for the significance criteria in Cumulative (2030) plus Project Conditions. When significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures needed to remove or reduce the impact to an acceptable level are described in the following section. Walters Road / Air Base Parkway The addition of Project-related traffic to Cumulative Conditions would cause the intersection to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours. Project-related traffic would increase intersection delay by five or more seconds and degrade operating conditions at this intersection during the AM peak hour. Therefore, this impact would be significant. Walters Road / Tabor Avenue The addition of Project-related traffic to Cumulative Conditions would cause the intersection to operate at an unacceptable LOS E during the PM peak hour. Project-related traffic would contribute to the poor operation and degrade operating conditions at this intersection from an acceptable LOS D under Cumulative Conditions to an unacceptable LOS E under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. Therefore, this impact would be significant.
Transportation Impact Study City of Suisun City
6.0 Mitigation and Improvement Measures 36
6.0 Transportation Mitigation and Improvement Measures This chapter presents the transportation mitigation measures that would be required to reduce the impacts of the Project to acceptable levels. Mitigation measures have been developed so that impacts attributable to the Project would be fully mitigated. In addition, improvement measures have been identified that would improve operating conditions where there would be less-than-significant impacts. 6.1 Existing plus Project 6.1.1 Traffic (with Walters Road driveway) All intersections operate acceptably according to each intersection’s LOS standard in Existing plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, no mitigation measures for traffic conditions are required. 6.1.2 Traffic (without Walters Road driveway) All intersections operate acceptably according to each intersection’s LOS standard in Existing plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, no mitigation measures for traffic conditions are required. 6.1.3 Hazards All new roadways and public roadways would be constructed such that they would not increase hazards due to a design feature and ensure public safety. Therefore, no mitigation measures due to hazards are required. However due to the speed limit along Walters Road, it is recommended that a right-turn deceleration taper be constructed for vehicles making the northbound right-turn to the Walters Road access point. 6.1.4 Emergency Access The project would provide sufficient emergency vehicle access. Therefore, no mitigation measures for emergency access are required.
Zephyr Estates
37 May 12, 2014
6.1.5 Alternative Modes
The Project would not eliminate or reduce alternative modes of transportation or conflict with adopted alternative transportation policies, plan, or programs. No mitigation is required.
6.2 Cumulative (2030) plus Project
6.2.1 Traffic (with Walters Road driveway)
The following mitigation measures are required to mitigate Project-generated traffic impacts under Cumulative (2030) plus Project with Walters Road driveway Conditions:
Air Base Parkway and Walters Road
The Applicant shall pay their fair share for the following mitigation measure before initial occupancy
of a residential unit:
The southbound right turn lane should be converted to a free-right turn lane. A westbound
receiving lane should also be added.
With this measure, the intersection would operate at LOS D with 50.8 seconds of delay during the
AM peak hour, which is an acceptable LOS for this location. The City of Fairfield examined congestion for this intersection as a part of the Train Station Specific Plan EIR, which includes
mitigation for this intersection. This includes adding a second left-turn pocket on the eastbound and northbound approaches; providing a channelized, free-right turn lane on the northbound approach;
and optimizing signal timings. Fairfield’s analysis shows that these improvements would provide LOS D (54.6 seconds delay) in the PM peak hour and LOS D (42.4 seconds delay) in the AM peak hour.
6.2.2 Traffic (without Walters Road driveway)
The following mitigation measures are required to mitigate Project-generated traffic impacts under
Cumulative (2030) plus Project without Walters Road driveway Conditions:
Air Base Parkway and Walters Road
The Applicant shall pay their fair share for the following mitigation measure before initial occupancy of a residential unit:
The southbound right turn lane should be converted to a free-right turn lane. A westbound receiving lane should also be added.
Transportation Impact Study City of Suisun City
6.0 Mitigation and Improvement Measures 38
With this measure, the intersection would operate at LOS D with 50.8 seconds of delay during the AM peak hour which is an acceptable LOS for this location. Implementation of the recommended mitigation would, thus, reduce the impact to an acceptable level. Tabor Avenue and Walters Road The Applicant shall pay their fair share for the following mitigation measure before initial occupancy of a residential unit:
• The southbound approach should be restriped to include an exclusive left turn lane, two exclusive through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane.
With this measure, the intersection would operate at LOS C with 33.4 seconds of delay during the PM peak hour which is an acceptable LOS for this location. Implementation of the recommended mitigation would, thus, reduce the impact to an acceptable level.
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Traffic Impact Study for Zephyr Estates Technical Appendix
A: Intersection Counts B: Intersection Level of Service Calculations and Signal Warrant Summary
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Appendix A Intersection Counts
File Name :Date :
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total07:00 4 83 17 0 104 1 2 21 0 24 12 149 2 0 163 65 2 15 0 82 373 007:15 5 72 20 0 97 8 7 26 0 41 16 228 1 0 245 60 6 10 0 76 459 007:30 9 76 26 0 111 1 29 26 0 56 28 190 0 0 218 37 6 15 0 58 443 007:45 7 106 30 0 143 1 20 28 0 49 23 171 0 0 194 42 4 21 0 67 453 0Total 25 337 93 0 455 11 58 101 0 170 79 738 3 0 820 204 18 61 0 283 1728 0
08:00 17 86 30 0 133 1 3 24 0 28 22 165 0 0 187 51 11 13 0 75 423 008:15 6 83 25 0 114 2 3 13 0 18 12 108 0 0 120 29 3 10 0 42 294 008:30 6 76 14 0 96 1 6 13 0 20 9 102 1 0 112 41 6 19 0 66 294 008:45 20 70 35 1 126 2 8 8 0 18 13 81 10 0 104 36 11 11 0 58 306 1Total 49 315 104 1 469 6 20 58 0 84 56 456 11 0 523 157 31 53 0 241 1317 1
16:00 13 179 67 0 259 2 3 12 0 17 16 129 0 0 145 34 6 17 0 57 478 016:15 20 175 66 0 261 1 2 12 0 15 24 146 0 0 170 45 6 19 0 70 516 016:30 16 155 57 0 228 0 3 13 0 16 16 121 0 0 137 38 3 17 0 58 439 016:45 28 194 68 0 290 1 3 16 0 20 22 129 3 0 154 34 2 19 0 55 519 0Total 77 703 258 0 1038 4 11 53 0 68 78 525 3 0 606 151 17 72 0 240 1952 0
17:00 21 194 54 1 270 0 4 6 0 10 15 100 1 1 117 45 7 20 0 72 469 217:15 20 174 40 1 235 2 4 14 0 20 22 145 4 0 171 46 8 16 0 70 496 117:30 24 167 43 0 234 0 7 13 0 20 17 118 2 0 137 37 8 10 0 55 446 017:45 25 94 38 0 157 2 7 7 0 16 16 118 0 0 134 53 6 16 0 75 382 0Total 90 629 175 2 896 4 22 40 0 66 70 481 7 1 559 181 29 62 0 272 1793 3
Grand Total 241 1984 630 3 2858 25 111 252 0 388 283 2200 24 1 2508 693 95 248 0 1036 6790 4Apprch % 8.4% 69.4% 22.0% 0.1% 6.4% 28.6% 64.9% 0.0% 11.3% 87.7% 1.0% 0.0% 66.9% 9.2% 23.9% 0.0%
Total % 3.5% 29.2% 9.3% 0.0% 42.1% 0.4% 1.6% 3.7% 0.0% 5.7% 4.2% 32.4% 0.4% 0.0% 36.9% 10.2% 1.4% 3.7% 0.0% 15.3% 100.0%
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:15 to 08:15Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 5 72 20 0 97 8 7 26 0 41 16 228 1 0 245 60 6 10 0 76 45907:30 9 76 26 0 111 1 29 26 0 56 28 190 0 0 218 37 6 15 0 58 44307:45 7 106 30 0 143 1 20 28 0 49 23 171 0 0 194 42 4 21 0 67 45308:00 17 86 30 0 133 1 3 24 0 28 22 165 0 0 187 51 11 13 0 75 423
Total Volume 38 340 106 0 484 11 59 104 0 174 89 754 1 0 844 190 27 59 0 276 1778% App Total 7.9% 70.2% 21.9% 0.0% 6.3% 33.9% 59.8% 0.0% 10.5% 89.3% 0.1% 0.0% 68.8% 9.8% 21.4% 0.0%
PHF .559 .802 .883 .000 .846 .344 .509 .929 .000 .777 .795 .827 .250 .000 .861 .792 .614 .702 .000 .908 .968
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:00Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 13 179 67 0 259 2 3 12 0 17 16 129 0 0 145 34 6 17 0 57 47816:15 20 175 66 0 261 1 2 12 0 15 24 146 0 0 170 45 6 19 0 70 51616:30 16 155 57 0 228 0 3 13 0 16 16 121 0 0 137 38 3 17 0 58 43916:45 28 194 68 0 290 1 3 16 0 20 22 129 3 0 154 34 2 19 0 55 519
Total Volume 77 703 258 0 1038 4 11 53 0 68 78 525 3 0 606 151 17 72 0 240 1952% App Total 7.4% 67.7% 24.9% 0.0% 5.9% 16.2% 77.9% 0.0% 12.9% 86.6% 0.5% 0.0% 62.9% 7.1% 30.0% 0.0%
PHF .688 .906 .949 .000 .895 .500 .917 .828 .000 .850 .813 .899 .250 .000 .891 .839 .708 .947 .000 .857 .940
Walters RoadNorthbound
Tabor AvenueWestbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Tabor AvenueWestbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Tabor AvenueEastbound
14-7076-001 Walters Road-Tabor Avenue.ppd
Unshifted Count = All VehiclesNothing on Bank 2
Tabor AvenueEastbound
2/25/2014
PM PEAK HOUR
Walters RoadSouthbound
Tabor AvenueWestbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
AM PEAK HOUR
Tabor AvenueEastbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
ALL TRAFFIC DATACity of Suisun CityAll Vehicles on UnshiftedNothing on Bank 1
ALL TRAFFIC DATA(916) 771-8700
orders@atdtraffic.com
File Name :Date :
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total07:00 43 3 76 1 123 0 87 40 0 127 22 28 1 1 52 38 53 8 1 100 402 307:15 35 4 124 0 163 0 89 24 0 113 32 38 0 0 70 56 67 9 1 133 479 107:30 17 8 115 0 140 0 107 26 0 133 27 25 0 0 52 43 77 10 1 131 456 107:45 18 9 76 0 103 1 74 25 0 100 18 20 1 0 39 60 49 7 1 117 359 1Total 113 24 391 1 529 1 357 115 0 473 99 111 2 1 213 197 246 34 4 481 1696 6
08:00 15 5 68 0 88 0 88 19 0 107 13 19 1 0 33 56 53 3 0 112 340 008:15 14 6 62 0 82 0 76 19 0 95 12 12 1 0 25 53 67 12 0 132 334 008:30 25 10 73 0 108 0 64 20 0 84 13 14 1 0 28 42 49 5 1 97 317 108:45 12 5 79 0 96 0 86 15 0 101 17 12 1 1 31 45 51 12 2 110 338 3Total 66 26 282 0 374 0 314 73 0 387 55 57 4 1 117 196 220 32 3 451 1329 4
16:00 41 16 84 0 141 0 90 48 0 138 12 18 0 0 30 119 90 20 2 231 540 216:15 28 15 85 0 128 1 74 61 0 136 8 17 0 0 25 87 118 23 2 230 519 216:30 31 14 90 0 135 0 60 31 0 91 10 8 0 0 18 101 106 19 3 229 473 316:45 27 19 91 0 137 3 59 14 0 76 9 16 0 0 25 116 106 20 2 244 482 2Total 127 64 350 0 541 4 283 154 0 441 39 59 0 0 98 423 420 82 9 934 2014 9
17:00 36 30 69 0 135 3 68 18 0 89 10 10 0 0 20 124 86 23 1 234 478 117:15 22 24 89 0 135 2 65 14 0 81 6 13 0 1 20 139 123 23 3 288 524 417:30 31 20 66 0 117 1 50 12 0 63 10 24 1 0 35 117 83 23 4 227 442 417:45 15 19 62 0 96 1 49 14 0 64 11 8 0 0 19 116 82 20 1 219 398 1Total 104 93 286 0 483 7 232 58 0 297 37 55 1 1 94 496 374 89 9 968 1842 10
Grand Total 410 207 1309 1 1927 12 1186 400 0 1598 230 282 7 3 522 1312 1260 237 25 2834 6881 29Apprch % 21.3% 10.7% 67.9% 0.1% 0.8% 74.2% 25.0% 0.0% 44.1% 54.0% 1.3% 0.6% 46.3% 44.5% 8.4% 0.9%
Total % 6.0% 3.0% 19.0% 0.0% 28.0% 0.2% 17.2% 5.8% 0.0% 23.2% 3.3% 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% 7.6% 19.1% 18.3% 3.4% 0.4% 41.2% 100.0%
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 08:00Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00
07:00 43 3 76 1 123 0 87 40 0 127 22 28 1 1 52 38 53 8 1 100 40207:15 35 4 124 0 163 0 89 24 0 113 32 38 0 0 70 56 67 9 1 133 47907:30 17 8 115 0 140 0 107 26 0 133 27 25 0 0 52 43 77 10 1 131 45607:45 18 9 76 0 103 1 74 25 0 100 18 20 1 0 39 60 49 7 1 117 359
Total Volume 113 24 391 1 529 1 357 115 0 473 99 111 2 1 213 197 246 34 4 481 1696% App Total 21.4% 4.5% 73.9% 0.2% 0.2% 75.5% 24.3% 0.0% 46.5% 52.1% 0.9% 0.5% 41.0% 51.1% 7.1% 0.8%
PHF .657 .667 .788 .250 .811 .250 .834 .719 .000 .889 .773 .730 .500 .250 .761 .821 .799 .850 1.000 .904 .885
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 16:00 to 17:00Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:00
16:00 41 16 84 0 141 0 90 48 0 138 12 18 0 0 30 119 90 20 2 231 54016:15 28 15 85 0 128 1 74 61 0 136 8 17 0 0 25 87 118 23 2 230 51916:30 31 14 90 0 135 0 60 31 0 91 10 8 0 0 18 101 106 19 3 229 47316:45 27 19 91 0 137 3 59 14 0 76 9 16 0 0 25 116 106 20 2 244 482
Total Volume 127 64 350 0 541 4 283 154 0 441 39 59 0 0 98 423 420 82 9 934 2014% App Total 23.5% 11.8% 64.7% 0.0% 0.9% 64.2% 34.9% 0.0% 39.8% 60.2% 0.0% 0.0% 45.3% 45.0% 8.8% 1.0%
PHF .774 .842 .962 .000 .959 .333 .786 .631 .000 .799 .813 .819 .000 .000 .817 .889 .890 .891 .750 .957 .932
Walters RoadNorthbound
Highway 12Westbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Highway 12Westbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Highway 12Eastbound
14-7076-002 Walters Road-Highway 12.ppd
Unshifted Count = All VehiclesNothing on Bank 2
Highway 12Eastbound
2/25/2014
PM PEAK HOUR
Walters RoadSouthbound
Highway 12Westbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
AM PEAK HOUR
Highway 12Eastbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
ALL TRAFFIC DATACity of Suisun CityAll Vehicles on UnshiftedNothing on Bank 1
ALL TRAFFIC DATA(916) 771-8700
orders@atdtraffic.com
File Name :Date :
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total07:00 0 23 13 0 36 42 54 1 0 97 53 19 157 0 229 18 210 44 1 273 635 107:15 0 17 13 0 30 40 80 2 0 122 69 50 200 0 319 29 322 45 0 396 867 007:30 2 9 17 0 28 34 100 1 0 135 98 29 147 0 274 36 222 67 0 325 762 007:45 0 14 25 0 39 72 74 1 0 147 82 27 140 0 249 22 220 72 0 314 749 0Total 2 63 68 0 133 188 308 5 0 501 302 125 644 0 1071 105 974 228 1 1308 3013 1
08:00 2 10 20 0 32 61 113 4 0 178 68 28 136 0 232 16 173 57 0 246 688 008:15 1 16 17 0 34 51 94 1 0 146 53 22 95 0 170 18 137 46 0 201 551 008:30 3 16 16 0 35 42 80 2 0 124 45 33 85 0 163 18 142 37 0 197 519 008:45 0 19 19 0 38 56 80 0 0 136 49 8 65 0 122 26 141 61 2 230 526 2Total 6 61 72 0 139 210 367 7 0 584 215 91 381 0 687 78 593 201 2 874 2284 2
16:00 0 27 25 0 52 163 242 3 0 408 54 38 76 0 168 25 97 66 0 188 816 016:15 1 16 18 0 35 177 255 4 0 436 58 47 100 0 205 15 91 49 1 156 832 116:30 0 32 28 0 60 138 250 3 1 392 57 38 79 0 174 27 105 63 0 195 821 116:45 3 33 14 0 50 180 290 5 0 475 54 29 91 0 174 26 104 69 1 200 899 1Total 4 108 85 0 197 658 1037 15 1 1711 223 152 346 0 721 93 397 247 2 739 3368 3
17:00 1 34 34 0 69 164 221 5 2 392 40 34 91 0 165 31 115 73 1 220 846 317:15 0 39 17 0 56 116 167 1 1 285 58 46 97 0 201 19 109 74 1 203 745 217:30 1 22 22 0 45 121 165 3 0 289 56 33 87 0 176 25 99 79 0 203 713 017:45 2 27 15 0 44 103 116 1 0 220 42 32 94 0 168 25 110 48 0 183 615 0Total 4 122 88 0 214 504 669 10 3 1186 196 145 369 0 710 100 433 274 2 809 2919 5
Grand Total 16 354 313 0 683 1560 2381 37 4 3982 936 513 1740 0 3189 376 2397 950 7 3730 11584 11Apprch % 2.3% 51.8% 45.8% 0.0% 39.2% 59.8% 0.9% 0.1% 29.4% 16.1% 54.6% 0.0% 10.1% 64.3% 25.5% 0.2%
Total % 0.1% 3.1% 2.7% 0.0% 5.9% 13.5% 20.6% 0.3% 0.0% 34.4% 8.1% 4.4% 15.0% 0.0% 27.5% 3.2% 20.7% 8.2% 0.1% 32.2% 100.0%
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 07:15 to 08:15Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 17 13 0 30 40 80 2 0 122 69 50 200 0 319 29 322 45 0 396 86707:30 2 9 17 0 28 34 100 1 0 135 98 29 147 0 274 36 222 67 0 325 76207:45 0 14 25 0 39 72 74 1 0 147 82 27 140 0 249 22 220 72 0 314 74908:00 2 10 20 0 32 61 113 4 0 178 68 28 136 0 232 16 173 57 0 246 688
Total Volume 4 50 75 0 129 207 367 8 0 582 317 134 623 0 1074 103 937 241 0 1281 3066% App Total 3.1% 38.8% 58.1% 0.0% 35.6% 63.1% 1.4% 0.0% 29.5% 12.5% 58.0% 0.0% 8.0% 73.1% 18.8% 0.0%
PHF .500 .735 .750 .000 .827 .719 .812 .500 .000 .817 .809 .670 .779 .000 .842 .715 .727 .837 .000 .809 .884
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 16:15 to 17:15Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:15
16:15 1 16 18 0 35 177 255 4 0 436 58 47 100 0 205 15 91 49 1 156 83216:30 0 32 28 0 60 138 250 3 1 392 57 38 79 0 174 27 105 63 0 195 82116:45 3 33 14 0 50 180 290 5 0 475 54 29 91 0 174 26 104 69 1 200 89917:00 1 34 34 0 69 164 221 5 2 392 40 34 91 0 165 31 115 73 1 220 846
Total Volume 5 115 94 0 214 659 1016 17 3 1695 209 148 361 0 718 99 415 254 3 771 3398% App Total 2.3% 53.7% 43.9% 0.0% 38.9% 59.9% 1.0% 0.2% 29.1% 20.6% 50.3% 0.0% 12.8% 53.8% 32.9% 0.4%
PHF .417 .846 .691 .000 .775 .915 .876 .850 .375 .892 .901 .787 .903 .000 .876 .798 .902 .870 .750 .876 .945
Walters RoadNorthbound
Air Base ParkwayWestbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Air Base ParkwayWestbound
Walters RoadSouthbound
Air Base ParkwayEastbound
14-7076-003 Walters Road-Air Base Parkway.ppd
Unshifted Count = All VehiclesNothing on Bank 2
Air Base ParkwayEastbound
2/25/2014
PM PEAK HOUR
Walters RoadSouthbound
Air Base ParkwayWestbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
AM PEAK HOUR
Air Base ParkwayEastbound
Walters RoadNorthbound
ALL TRAFFIC DATACity of Suisun CityAll Vehicles on UnshiftedNothing on Bank 1
ALL TRAFFIC DATA(916) 771-8700
orders@atdtraffic.com
File Name :
Date :
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total
07:00 0 87 0 0 87 0 0 1 0 1 0 176 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 264 0
07:15 0 102 0 0 102 0 0 2 0 2 0 244 0 0 244 0 0 0 0 0 348 0
07:30 0 96 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 1 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 314 0
07:45 0 128 0 0 128 0 0 2 0 2 0 183 3 0 186 0 0 0 0 0 316 0
Total 0 413 0 0 413 0 0 5 0 5 0 820 4 0 824 0 0 0 0 0 1242 0
08:00 0 101 0 0 101 0 0 2 0 2 0 180 3 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 286 0
08:15 0 94 0 0 94 0 0 2 0 2 0 108 1 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 205 0
08:30 0 95 0 0 95 0 0 1 0 1 0 110 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 206 0
08:45 0 84 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 3 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 194 0
Total 0 374 0 0 374 0 0 5 0 5 0 505 7 0 512 0 0 0 0 0 891 0
16:00 0 196 0 0 196 0 0 1 0 1 0 151 5 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 353 0
16:15 0 196 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 4 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 361 0
16:30 0 166 0 0 166 0 0 1 0 1 0 132 4 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 303 0
16:45 0 218 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 2 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 373 0
Total 0 776 0 0 776 0 0 2 0 2 0 597 15 0 612 0 0 0 0 0 1390 0
17:00 0 210 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 4 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 344 0
17:15 0 186 0 0 186 0 0 1 0 1 0 169 6 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 362 0
17:30 0 184 0 0 184 0 0 1 0 1 0 141 4 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 330 0
17:45 0 110 0 0 110 0 0 1 0 1 0 135 4 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 250 0
Total 0 690 0 0 690 0 0 3 0 3 0 575 18 0 593 0 0 0 0 0 1286 0
Grand Total 0 2253 0 0 2253 0 0 15 0 15 0 2497 44 0 2541 0 0 0 0 0 4809 0
Apprch % 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total % 0.0% 46.8% 0.0% 0.0% 46.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 51.9% 0.9% 0.0% 52.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 to 08:15
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 102 0 0 102 0 0 2 0 2 0 244 0 0 244 0 0 0 0 0 348
07:30 0 96 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 1 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 314
07:45 0 128 0 0 128 0 0 2 0 2 0 183 3 0 186 0 0 0 0 0 316
08:00 0 101 0 0 101 0 0 2 0 2 0 180 3 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 286
Total Volume 0 427 0 0 427 0 0 6 0 6 0 824 7 0 831 0 0 0 0 0 1264
% App Total 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PHF .000 .834 .000 .000 .834 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .000 .844 .583 .000 .851 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .908
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 16:45 to 17:45
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45
16:45 0 218 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 2 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 373
17:00 0 210 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 4 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 344
17:15 0 186 0 0 186 0 0 1 0 1 0 169 6 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 362
17:30 0 184 0 0 184 0 0 1 0 1 0 141 4 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 330
Total Volume 0 798 0 0 798 0 0 2 0 2 0 593 16 0 609 0 0 0 0 0 1409
% App Total 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.4% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PHF .000 .915 .000 .000 .915 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .877 .667 .000 .870 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .944
ALL TRAFFIC DATACity of Suisun City
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Nothing on Bank 1
ALL TRAFFIC DATA(916) 771-8700
orders@atdtraffic.com
Gunter Drive
Westbound
Walters Road
Northbound
AM PEAK
HOUR
Eastbound
Walters Road
Northbound
Eastbound
14-7076-004 Walters Road-Gunter Drive.ppd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
Eastbound
2/25/2014
Walters Road
Southbound
Walters Road
Northbound
Gunter Drive
Westbound
Walters Road
Southbound
Gunter Drive
Westbound
Walters Road
Southbound
PM PEAK
HOUR
File Name :
Date :
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total Uturn Total
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 25 0 0 3 0 3 28 0
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 41 0 0 8 0 8 49 0
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 56 0 0 7 0 7 63 0
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0 11 0 11 61 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 0 172 0 0 29 0 29 201 0
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 28 56 0
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 10 0 10 26 0
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 10 0 10 28 0
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 10 0 10 33 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 85 0 0 58 0 58 143 0
16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 18 0 18 37 0
16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 25 0 25 39 0
16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 17 0 0 20 0 20 37 0
16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 29 0 29 45 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 66 0 0 92 0 92 158 0
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 28 0 28 36 0
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 26 0 26 44 0
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 34 0 34 50 0
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 32 0 32 48 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 58 0 0 120 0 120 178 0
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 381 0 0 0 381 0 0 299 0 299 680 0
Apprch % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Total % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.0% 0.0% 44.0% 100.0%
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 to 08:15
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 41 0 0 8 0 8 49
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 56 0 0 7 0 7 63
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0 11 0 11 61
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 28 56
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 175 0 0 54 0 54 229
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .781 .000 .000 .000 .781 .000 .000 .482 .000 .482 .909
START TIME LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT UTURNS APP.TOTAL Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 17:00 to 18:00
Peak Hour For Entire Intersection Begins at 17:00
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 28 0 28 36
17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 26 0 26 44
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 34 0 34 50
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 32 0 32 48
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 58 0 0 120 0 120 178
% App Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .806 .000 .000 .000 .806 .000 .000 .882 .000 .882 .890
ALL TRAFFIC DATACity of Suisun City
All Vehicles on Unshifted
Nothing on Bank 1
ALL TRAFFIC DATA(916) 771-8700
orders@atdtraffic.com
Tabor Avenue
Westbound
Charleston Street
Northbound
AM PEAK
HOUR
Tabor Avenue
Eastbound
Charleston Street
Northbound
Tabor Avenue
Eastbound
14-7076-005 Charleston Street-Tabor Avenue.ppd
Unshifted Count = All Vehicles
Nothing on Bank 2
Tabor Avenue
Eastbound
2/25/2014
Southbound
Charleston Street
Northbound
Tabor Avenue
WestboundSouthbound
Tabor Avenue
WestboundSouthbound
PM PEAK
HOUR
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Appendix B Intersection Level of Service Calculations and Signal Warrant
Summary
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Existing No Project
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing AM Command: Existing AM Volume: Existing AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: No project Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report No project Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 3066 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 3066 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 1778 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 1778 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1264 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1264 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 1690 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 1690 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 229 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 229 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 830 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1240 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 830 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1240 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 241 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 241 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base D 49.9 0.929 D 49.9 0.929 + 0.000 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor B 18.8 0.533 B 18.8 0.533 + 0.000 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter B 11.5 0.012 B 11.5 0.012 + 0.000 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 B 17.4 0.558 B 17.4 0.558 + 0.000 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.3 0.187 A 9.3 0.187 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter No / No ??? / ??? # 5 Charleston / Tabor No / No ??? / ??? Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.5 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=6] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1264] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 5-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1258 Minor Approach Volume: 6 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 206 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 5-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.5] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=175] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=229] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 5-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 54 Minor Approach Volume: 175 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.929 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 49.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 356 151 700 4 56 84 116 1053 271 233 412 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 356 151 700 4 56 84 116 1053 271 233 412 9 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 356 151 700 4 56 84 116 1053 271 233 412 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.08 0.43 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.29 0.17 0.07 0.11 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.45 0.45 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.24 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.18 0.97 0.07 0.25 0.44 0.48 0.97 0.56 0.97 0.48 0.02 Delay/Veh: 28.4 18.3 55.1 51.6 44.7 46.8 45.7 57.7 33.7 99.8 36.6 32.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.4 18.3 55.1 51.6 44.7 46.8 45.7 57.7 33.7 99.8 36.6 32.2 LOS by Move: C B E D D D D E C F D C HCM2kAvgQ: 9 3 26 0 2 3 4 24 8 7 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.533 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 92 777 1 39 351 109 196 28 61 11 61 107 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 777 1 39 351 109 196 28 61 11 61 107 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 777 1 39 351 109 196 28 61 11 61 107 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.52 0.48 2.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 0.36 0.64 Final Sat.: 1805 3605 5 1805 2653 827 3502 535 1169 1805 622 1096 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.18 0.18 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.55 0.55 0.33 0.44 0.44 0.55 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.55 0.55 Delay/Veh: 23.4 14.8 14.8 28.3 17.1 17.1 27.6 22.0 22.0 24.5 24.8 24.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.4 14.8 14.8 28.3 17.1 17.1 27.6 22.0 22.0 24.5 24.8 24.8 LOS by Move: C B B C B B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 4 4 3 2 2 0 4 4 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.5] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 905 8 0 469 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 905 8 0 469 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 457 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 556 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 556 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.5 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.558 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 111 125 2 127 27 439 221 276 38 1 401 129 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 125 2 127 27 439 221 276 38 1 401 129 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 125 2 127 27 439 221 276 38 1 401 129 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1417 1900 1615 1277 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.27 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.11 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.20 0.20 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.13 0.00 0.20 0.03 0.56 0.56 0.39 0.12 0.01 0.56 0.40 Delay/Veh: 8.7 8.5 7.9 8.9 8.0 11.7 27.0 21.2 19.9 23.6 22.6 21.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 8.7 8.5 7.9 8.9 8.0 11.7 27.0 21.2 19.9 23.6 22.6 21.7 LOS by Move: A A A A A B C C B C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 1 0 6 3 3 1 0 4 3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:00:17 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing PM
Command: Existing PM
Volume: Existing PM
Geometry: Existing
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: No project
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
No project
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 3392
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 3392
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 1952
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 1952
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1409
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1409
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 2005
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 2005
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 178
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 178
#6
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#7
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#8
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base C 34.8 0.717 C 34.8 0.717 + 0.000 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor C 20.5 0.509 C 20.5 0.509 + 0.000 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter B 10.3 0.003 B 10.3 0.003 + 0.000 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 C 27.5 0.529 C 27.5 0.529 + 0.000 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.7 0.063 A 8.7 0.063 + 0.000 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter No / No ??? / ???
# 5 Charleston / Tabor No / No ??? / ???
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1409]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 5-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 1407
Minor Approach Volume: 2
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 167
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 5-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=58]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=178]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 5-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 120
Minor Approach Volume: 58
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 785
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.717
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.8
Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
PHF Volume: 220 156 380 5 121 99 104 437 267 694 1069 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 220 156 380 5 121 99 104 437 267 694 1069 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 220 156 380 5 121 99 104 437 267 694 1069 18
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.17 0.20 0.30 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.26 0.41 0.41
Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.26 0.75 0.07 0.49 0.47 0.73 0.55 0.75 0.75 0.73 0.03
Delay/Veh: 35.7 25.8 36.8 46.6 42.0 42.1 62.2 35.3 44.8 37.1 26.9 17.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.7 25.8 36.8 46.6 42.0 42.1 62.2 35.3 44.8 37.1 26.9 17.8
LOS by Move: D C D D D D E D D D C B
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 4 12 0 4 3 5 7 9 12 16 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.509
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.5
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
PHF Volume: 83 559 3 82 748 274 161 18 77 4 12 56
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 83 559 3 82 748 274 161 18 77 4 12 56
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 83 559 3 82 748 274 161 18 77 4 12 56
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.88 0.88
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.46 0.54 2.00 0.19 0.81 1.00 0.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1805 3586 20 1805 2535 930 3502 319 1351 1805 286 1378
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.58 0.58 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.08 0.08
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.51 0.51
Delay/Veh: 46.0 13.8 13.8 38.4 12.8 12.8 44.8 44.9 44.9 44.2 47.3 47.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.0 13.8 13.8 38.4 12.8 12.8 44.8 44.9 44.9 44.2 47.3 47.3
LOS by Move: D B B D B B D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 5 5 2 10 10 3 3 3 0 3 3
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.3]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
PHF Volume: 0 631 17 0 849 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 631 17 0 849 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 324
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 678
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 678
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.3
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.529
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.5
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
PHF Volume: 42 63 0 137 69 376 455 452 88 4 304 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 63 0 137 69 376 455 452 88 4 304 166
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 63 0 137 69 376 455 452 88 4 304 166
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1355 1900 1900 1362 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.23 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.19 0.19
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.08 0.53 0.53 0.38 0.16 0.02 0.43 0.53
Delay/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.2 33.3 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 37.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.2 33.3 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 37.9
LOS by Move: B B A B B C C C C D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 3 1 9 7 6 2 0 5 5
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing PM Thu Apr 17, 2014 19:04:58 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.7]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
PHF Volume: 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Cumulative No Project
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:18 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Cumulative AM Command: Cumulative AM Volume: Cumulative AM Geometry: Cumulative Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: No project Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:18 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report No project Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base F 91.0 1.179 F 91.0 1.179 + 0.000 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor C 32.2 0.889 C 32.2 0.889 + 0.000 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter B 12.4 0.015 B 12.4 0.015 + 0.000 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 D 38.0 0.946 D 38.0 0.946 + 0.000 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.7 0.254 A 9.7 0.254 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter No / No ??? / ??? # 5 Charleston / Tabor No / No ??? / ??? Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1996] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 5-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1989 Minor Approach Volume: 7 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 48 [less than minimum of 100] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 5-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.6] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=240] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=340] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 5-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 100 Minor Approach Volume: 240 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 834 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.179 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 91.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 User Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 350 570 350 83 442 662 423 607 248 589 662 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 350 570 350 83 442 662 423 607 248 589 662 28 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 350 570 350 83 442 662 423 607 248 589 662 28 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.16 0.22 0.05 0.12 0.41 0.23 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.42 0.42 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 Volume/Cap: 1.18 0.37 0.51 0.51 0.35 1.18 1.18 0.95 0.87 0.95 1.18 0.11 Delay/Veh: 160.0 23.9 26.2 54.9 29.2 137.0 153.8 72.4 71.3 72.9 149 43.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 160.0 23.9 26.2 54.9 29.2 137.0 153.8 72.4 71.3 72.9 149 43.7 LOS by Move: F C C D C F F E E E F D HCM2kAvgQ: 20 7 9 4 6 39 26 16 12 15 22 1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.889 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 141 913 11 76 967 413 315 22 98 22 54 185 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 141 913 11 76 967 413 315 22 98 22 54 185 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 141 913 11 76 967 413 315 22 98 22 54 185 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.40 0.60 2.00 0.18 0.82 1.00 0.23 0.77 Final Sat.: 1805 3560 42 1805 2416 1032 3502 303 1363 1805 382 1298 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.16 0.16 Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.57 0.57 0.48 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.43 0.43 0.13 0.89 0.89 Delay/Veh: 77.0 16.7 16.7 37.0 26.9 26.9 58.4 31.0 31.0 33.5 61.0 61.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 77.0 16.7 16.7 37.0 26.9 26.9 58.4 31.0 31.0 33.5 61.0 61.0 LOS by Move: E B B D C C E C C C E E HCM2kAvgQ: 4 9 9 2 18 18 7 3 3 1 9 9 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.4] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 1065 10 0 1087 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1065 10 0 1087 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 538 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 493 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 493 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.4 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.4 ApproachLOS: * * * B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 337 207 33 620 76 337 457 750 130 11 511 207 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 337 207 33 620 76 337 457 750 130 11 511 207 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 337 207 33 620 76 337 457 750 130 11 511 207 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.61 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1343 1900 1615 1165 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.11 0.02 0.53 0.04 0.21 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.01 0.14 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.15 0.15 Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.19 0.04 0.95 0.07 0.37 0.95 0.90 0.35 0.11 0.95 0.85 Delay/Veh: 10.6 8.7 7.8 39.0 8.0 9.9 61.9 42.1 26.2 36.4 59.5 57.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 10.6 8.7 7.8 39.0 8.0 9.9 61.9 42.1 26.2 36.4 59.5 57.6 LOS by Move: B A A D A A E D C D E E HCM2kAvgQ: 5 2 0 15 1 4 10 13 3 0 11 8 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative AM Sat May 10, 2014 17:02:19 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative No Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.25 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:19 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Cumulative PM
Command: Cumulative PM
Volume: Cumulative PM
Geometry: Cumulative
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: No project
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:19 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
No project
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 6840
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 6840
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 3950
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 3950
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2962
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2962
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 4550
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 4550
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 190
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 190
#6
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#7
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#8
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base F 164.0 1.510 F 164.0 1.510 + 0.000 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor D 46.6 0.985 D 46.6 0.985 + 0.000 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter C 16.4 0.007 C 16.4 0.007 + 0.000 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 E 75.6 1.225 E 75.6 1.225 + 0.000 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.8 0.085 A 8.8 0.085 + 0.000 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter No / No ??? / ???
# 5 Charleston / Tabor No / No ??? / ???
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2962]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 5-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 2960
Minor Approach Volume: 2
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -89 [less than minimum of 100]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 5-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=80]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=190]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 5-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 110
Minor Approach Volume: 80
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 808
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.510
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 164.0
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 391 804 848 43 859 380 620 1087 391 511 1359 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 391 804 848 43 859 380 620 1087 391 511 1359 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 391 804 848 43 859 380 620 1087 391 511 1359 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.52 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.15 0.38 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.24 0.24
Volume/Cap: 1.20 0.66 1.56 0.60 1.20 1.19 1.56 0.97 0.78 0.97 1.56 0.36
Delay/Veh: 158.6 29.6 292.1 60.7 145 153.6 301.1 53.1 38.8 72.8 294 32.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 158.6 29.6 292.1 60.7 145 153.6 301.1 53.1 38.8 72.8 294 32.1
LOS by Move: F C F E F F F D D E F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 23 12 64 2 26 22 47 23 13 12 54 4
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.985
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 46.6
Optimal Cycle: 165 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 207 1424 11 76 1424 391 522 33 120 11 22 54
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 207 1424 11 76 1424 391 522 33 120 11 22 54
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 207 1424 11 76 1424 391 522 33 120 11 22 54
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.89 0.89
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.57 0.43 2.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 0.29 0.71
Final Sat.: 1805 3579 27 1805 2741 753 3502 359 1317 1805 485 1212
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.06 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.07
Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.71 0.71 0.71 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.60 0.60 0.09 0.64 0.64
Delay/Veh: 111.9 17.0 17.0 65.3 50.0 50.0 86.7 43.8 43.8 44.2 56.5 56.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 111.9 17.0 17.0 65.3 50.0 50.0 86.7 43.8 43.8 44.2 56.5 56.5
LOS by Move: F B B E D D F D D D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 17 17 4 38 38 14 5 5 0 3 3
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.4]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 0 1641 22 0 1554 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 1641 22 0 1554 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 832
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 317
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 317
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 16.4
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * C
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.4
ApproachLOS: * * * C
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.225
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 75.6
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 174 120 22 326 217 674 500 761 315 43 957 837
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 174 120 22 326 217 674 500 761 315 43 957 837
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 174 120 22 326 217 674 500 761 315 43 957 837
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.52 1.00 0.85 0.66 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 996 1900 1615 1258 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.26 0.11 0.42 0.14 0.21 0.20 0.02 0.26 0.52
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.42 0.42
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.18 0.04 0.76 0.34 1.23 1.23 0.46 0.43 0.28 0.63 1.23
Delay/Veh: 27.7 23.3 22.1 37.2 24.9 149.8 165.6 19.1 19.0 43.8 23.5 143.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 27.7 23.3 22.1 37.2 24.9 149.8 165.6 19.1 19.0 43.8 23.5 143.0
LOS by Move: C C C D C F F B B D C F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 3 0 11 5 38 17 9 7 2 13 47
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative PM Sat Apr 19, 2014 17:43:20 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative No Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.08 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Existing Plus Project with Walters Road driveway
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:03 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing + Project AM
Command: Existing + Project AM
Volume: Existing AM
Geometry: Existing
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: AM
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:03 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for AM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of
# Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:03 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Existing
To Gates
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:03 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 3066
Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95
Total 347 134 649 4 50 75 103 937 262 225 367 8 3161
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 1778
Added 1 39 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 3 17 118
Total 90 793 1 76 340 106 190 30 59 28 62 121 1896
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1264
Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32
Total 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1296
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 1690
Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29
Total 99 111 2 117 24 404 206 246 34 1 357 118 1719
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 229
Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11
Total 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 240
#6 Walters / Project Dvy.
Base 0 830 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1240
Added 0 0 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 72
Total 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 1312
#7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 241
Added 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 35 3 0 0 84
Total 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0 325
#8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
Base 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229
Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 19
Total 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 248
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base D 50.0 0.922 D 54.3 0.950 + 4.316 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor B 18.8 0.533 B 19.8 0.595 + 1.034 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter B 11.5 0.012 B 11.7 0.018 + 0.106 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 B 17.4 0.558 B 17.6 0.573 + 0.167 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.3 0.187 A 9.3 0.190 + 0.017 D/V
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 B 11.6 0.068 +11.600 D/V
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 B 10.2 0.051 +10.204 D/V
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.6 0.007 + 8.583 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No
# 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=9]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1296]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 1287
Minor Approach Volume: 9
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 198
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.5]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=178]
SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=240]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 62
Minor Approach Volume: 178
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 961
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=40]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1312]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 1272
Minor Approach Volume: 40
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 202
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0
ApproachDel: 10.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=39]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=325]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 286
Minor Approach Volume: 39
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 553
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=248]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:04 Page 7-10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 241
Minor Approach Volume: 7
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 599
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 115 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.950
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 54.3
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8
Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 347 134 649 4 50 75 103 937 262 225 367 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
PHF Volume: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.08 0.45 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.29 0.18 0.07 0.11 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.38 0.46 0.46 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.24 0.24
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.17 0.99 0.07 0.27 0.48 0.48 0.99 0.62 0.99 0.48 0.02
Delay/Veh: 28.9 18.5 60.6 54.2 47.8 50.3 47.8 64.6 37.3 105.7 38.3 33.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 18.5 60.6 54.2 47.8 50.3 47.8 64.6 37.3 105.7 38.3 33.8
LOS by Move: C B E D D D D E D F D C
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 3 29 0 2 3 4 25 10 8 7 0
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 8-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.595
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.8
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104
Added Vol: 1 39 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 3 17
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 90 793 1 76 340 106 190 30 59 28 62 121
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
PHF Volume: 93 818 1 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 64 125
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 93 818 1 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 64 125
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 93 818 1 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 64 125
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.52 0.48 2.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 0.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1805 3605 5 1805 2653 827 3502 577 1135 1805 580 1132
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.19 0.19
Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.44 0.44 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.16 0.59 0.59
Delay/Veh: 23.5 15.6 15.6 34.1 17.1 17.1 29.0 22.0 22.0 25.0 25.4 25.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 23.5 15.6 15.6 34.1 17.1 17.1 29.0 22.0 22.0 25.0 25.4 25.4
LOS by Move: C B B C B B C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 1 4 4 3 2 2 1 4 4
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 9-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.7]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Added Vol: 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
PHF Volume: 0 919 8 0 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 919 8 0 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 463
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 551
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 551
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.7
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.7
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.573
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.6
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115
Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 99 111 2 117 24 404 206 246 34 1 357 118
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
PHF Volume: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1417 1900 1615 1277 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.28 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.11 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.19 0.19
Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.13 0.00 0.21 0.03 0.57 0.57 0.39 0.12 0.01 0.57 0.42
Delay/Veh: 8.6 8.4 7.8 8.8 7.9 11.8 27.1 21.3 20.0 23.7 23.1 22.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 8.6 8.4 7.8 8.8 7.9 11.8 27.1 21.3 20.0 23.7 23.1 22.2
LOS by Move: A A A A A B C C B C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 1 0 6 3 3 1 0 4 3
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 11-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 12-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0
Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
PHF Volume: 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 9.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.6]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 830 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 830 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 830 15 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 423
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 585
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 585
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.6
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.6
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.2]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0
Added Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 35 3 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 35 3 175 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 272 272 91 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 108 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 722 639 973 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1495 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 721 637 973 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1495 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 731 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 10.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * B * * * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 10.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:23:05 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.6]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 60 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1012 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1012 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * A *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:32 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing + Project PM
Command: Existing + Project PM
Volume: Existing PM
Geometry: Existing
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: PM
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:32 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of
# Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 1.00 Mixed Use 45.00 36.00 45 36 81 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 45 36 81 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .................................................. 45 36 81 100.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:32 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Existing
To Gates
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:32 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
PM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 3392
Added 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 54
Total 222 148 372 5 115 94 99 415 270 673 1016 17 3446
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 1952
Added 0 16 0 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 1 7 62
PassBy 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7
Total 78 541 3 110 699 258 151 19 72 15 12 63 2021
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1409
Added 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18
Total 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1427
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 2005
Added 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 16
Total 39 59 0 129 64 355 430 420 82 4 283 156 2021
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 178
Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8
Total 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 186
#6 Walters / Project Dvy.
Base 0 595 0 0 779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1374
Added 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 35
PassBy 0 -3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1409
#7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0 155
Added 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 26 2 0 0 50
PassBy 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 11
Total 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0 216
#8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
Base 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178
Added 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 11
Total 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 189
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base C 34.8 0.717 D 35.3 0.742 + 0.579 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor C 20.5 0.509 C 22.0 0.516 + 1.471 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter B 10.3 0.003 B 10.4 0.006 + 0.055 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 C 27.5 0.529 C 27.6 0.537 + 0.074 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.7 0.063 A 8.7 0.066 + 0.009 D/V
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 B 10.3 0.024 +10.278 D/V
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 A 9.5 0.028 + 9.529 D/V
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.9 0.003 + 8.872 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No
# 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1427]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 1423
Minor Approach Volume: 4
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 163
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=60]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=186]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 126
Minor Approach Volume: 60
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 772
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1409]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 1392
Minor Approach Volume: 17
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 171
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0
ApproachDel: 9.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=24]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=216]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 192
Minor Approach Volume: 24
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 660
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=3]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=189]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 7-10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 186
Minor Approach Volume: 3
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 668
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.742
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.3
Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17
Added Vol: 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 222 148 372 5 115 94 99 415 270 673 1016 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
PHF Volume: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.41 0.41
Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.26 0.78 0.07 0.52 0.50 0.73 0.53 0.78 0.78 0.73 0.03
Delay/Veh: 36.0 26.0 38.6 46.6 43.0 42.8 61.8 34.7 46.3 38.5 26.7 17.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.0 26.0 38.6 46.6 43.0 42.8 61.8 34.7 46.3 38.5 26.7 17.7
LOS by Move: D C D D D D E C D D C B
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 3 11 0 4 3 5 7 10 12 16 0
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 8-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.516
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.0
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53
Added Vol: 0 16 0 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 1 7
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3
Initial Fut: 78 541 3 110 699 258 151 19 72 15 12 63
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
PHF Volume: 83 576 3 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 13 67
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 83 576 3 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 13 67
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 83 576 3 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 13 67
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.87
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.46 0.54 2.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 0.16 0.84
Final Sat.: 1805 3587 20 1805 2531 934 3502 349 1324 1805 266 1395
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.19 0.57 0.57 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.09 0.09
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.50 0.50 0.13 0.52 0.52
Delay/Veh: 46.4 16.9 16.9 35.7 13.4 13.4 45.0 43.5 43.5 44.5 46.2 46.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.4 16.9 16.9 35.7 13.4 13.4 45.0 43.5 43.5 44.5 46.2 46.2
LOS by Move: D B B D B B D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 10 10 3 3 3 1 3 3
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 9-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.4]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
PHF Volume: 0 640 17 0 856 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 640 17 0 856 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 329
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 673
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 673
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.4
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.4
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.537
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.6
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154
Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 39 59 0 129 64 355 430 420 82 4 283 156
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
PHF Volume: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1355 1900 1900 1362 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.24 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.19 0.19
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.38 0.16 0.02 0.44 0.54
Delay/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.3 33.4 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 38.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.3 33.4 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 38.1
LOS by Move: B B A B B C C C C D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 3 1 8 7 6 2 0 5 5
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 11-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 12-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.7]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
PHF Volume: 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.3]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 595 0 0 779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 595 0 0 779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
PasserByVol: 0 -3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 592 14 0 786 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 303
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 699
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 699
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.3
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.5]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0
Added Vol: 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 26 2 0 0
PasserByVol: 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 30 2 58 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 179 179 117 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 132 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 815 718 941 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1466 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 814 717 941 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1466 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 819 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * A * * * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 9.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:18:34 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Existing + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.9]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 124 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 933 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 933 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * A *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Existing Plus Project without Walters Road driveway
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:04 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing + Project AM Command: Existing + Project AM Volume: Existing AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: AM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:04 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:04 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips Existing To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:04 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report AM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 3066 Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95 Total 347 134 649 4 50 75 103 937 262 225 367 8 3161 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 1778 Added 0 17 15 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 4 39 133 Total 89 771 16 76 340 106 190 30 59 28 63 143 1911 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1264 Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 49 Total 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1313 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 1690 Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29 Total 99 111 2 117 24 404 206 246 34 1 357 118 1719 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 229 Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 Total 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 240 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Total 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 241 Added 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 49 3 0 0 121 Total 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 362 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 35 Total 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 264 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base D 50.0 0.922 D 54.3 0.950 + 4.316 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor B 18.8 0.533 C 20.4 0.613 + 1.621 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter B 11.5 0.012 B 11.9 0.052 + 0.343 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 B 17.4 0.558 B 17.6 0.573 + 0.167 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.3 0.187 A 9.3 0.190 + 0.017 D/V # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 B 10.5 0.084 +10.466 D/V # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.6 0.023 + 8.641 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No # 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=26] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1313] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1287 Minor Approach Volume: 26 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 198 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.5] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=178] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=240] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 62 Minor Approach Volume: 178 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 961 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 ApproachDel: 10.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=62] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=362] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 300 Minor Approach Volume: 62 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 541 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=23] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=264] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 7-8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 241 Minor Approach Volume: 23 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 599 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 115 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.950 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 54.3 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 317 134 623 4 50 75 103 937 241 207 367 8 Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 347 134 649 4 50 75 103 937 262 225 367 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 390 151 729 4 56 84 116 1053 294 253 412 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.08 0.45 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.29 0.18 0.07 0.11 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.38 0.46 0.46 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.24 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.17 0.99 0.07 0.27 0.48 0.48 0.99 0.62 0.99 0.48 0.02 Delay/Veh: 28.9 18.5 60.6 54.2 47.8 50.3 47.8 64.6 37.3 105.7 38.3 33.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 18.5 60.6 54.2 47.8 50.3 47.8 64.6 37.3 105.7 38.3 33.8 LOS by Move: C B E D D D D E D F D C HCM2kAvgQ: 10 3 29 0 2 3 4 25 10 8 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 8-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.613 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 89 754 1 38 340 106 190 27 59 11 59 104 Added Vol: 0 17 15 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 4 39 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 89 771 16 76 340 106 190 30 59 28 63 143 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 92 795 16 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 65 147 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 795 16 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 65 147 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 795 16 78 351 109 196 31 61 29 65 147 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.52 0.48 2.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 0.31 0.69 Final Sat.: 1805 3526 73 1805 2653 827 3502 577 1135 1805 521 1182 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.37 0.37 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.20 0.20 Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.45 0.45 0.61 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 23.8 16.3 16.3 35.6 17.7 17.7 29.7 21.4 21.4 24.7 25.0 25.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.8 16.3 16.3 35.6 17.7 17.7 29.7 21.4 21.4 24.7 25.0 25.0 LOS by Move: C B B D B B C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 2 4 4 3 2 2 1 5 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 9-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 824 7 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Added Vol: 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 836 7 0 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 919 8 0 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 919 8 0 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 463 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 551 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 551 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.9 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.9 ApproachLOS: * * * B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.573 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 99 111 2 113 24 391 197 246 34 1 357 115 Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 99 111 2 117 24 404 206 246 34 1 357 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 125 2 131 27 454 231 276 38 1 401 133 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1417 1900 1615 1277 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.28 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.11 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.19 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.13 0.00 0.21 0.03 0.57 0.57 0.39 0.12 0.01 0.57 0.42 Delay/Veh: 8.6 8.4 7.8 8.8 7.9 11.8 27.1 21.3 20.0 23.7 23.1 22.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 8.6 8.4 7.8 8.8 7.9 11.8 27.1 21.3 20.0 23.7 23.1 22.2 LOS by Move: A A A A A B C C B C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 1 0 6 3 3 1 0 4 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 11-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 175 0 Added Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 49 3 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 73 49 3 175 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 279 279 98 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 122 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 716 633 964 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1478 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 715 632 964 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1478 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 721 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: 10.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:33:06 Page 14-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 175 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 178 0 0 56 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 60 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1012 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1012 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:24 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing + Project PM Command: Existing + Project PM Volume: Existing PM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: PM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:24 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 1.00 Mixed Use 45.00 36.00 45 36 81 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 45 36 81 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL .................................................. 45 36 81 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:24 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips Existing To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:24 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report PM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 3392 Added 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 54 Total 222 148 372 5 115 94 99 415 270 673 1016 17 3446 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 1952 Added 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 74 PassBy 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7 Total 78 529 17 110 699 258 151 19 72 15 13 72 2033 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1409 Added 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 25 Total 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1434 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 2005 Added 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 16 Total 39 59 0 129 64 355 430 420 82 4 283 156 2021 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 178 Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 Total 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 186 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Total 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0 155 Added 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 38 2 0 0 71 PassBy 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 14 Total 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 240 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 Added 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 18 Total 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 196 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base C 34.8 0.717 D 35.3 0.742 + 0.579 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor C 20.5 0.509 C 22.5 0.524 + 1.927 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter B 10.3 0.003 B 10.4 0.017 + 0.116 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 C 27.5 0.529 C 27.6 0.537 + 0.074 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.7 0.063 A 8.7 0.066 + 0.009 D/V # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 A 9.6 0.040 + 9.635 D/V # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.9 0.011 + 8.901 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No # 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=11] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=1434] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 1423 Minor Approach Volume: 11 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 163 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=60] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=186] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 126 Minor Approach Volume: 60 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 772 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 ApproachDel: 9.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=33] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=240] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 207 Minor Approach Volume: 33 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 639 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=10] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=196] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 7-8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 186 Minor Approach Volume: 10 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 668 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.742 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.3 Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 209 148 361 5 115 94 99 415 254 659 1016 17 Added Vol: 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 222 148 372 5 115 94 99 415 270 673 1016 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 234 156 392 5 121 99 104 437 284 708 1069 18 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.20 0.30 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.41 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.26 0.78 0.07 0.52 0.50 0.73 0.53 0.78 0.78 0.73 0.03 Delay/Veh: 36.0 26.0 38.6 46.6 43.0 42.8 61.8 34.7 46.3 38.5 26.7 17.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.0 26.0 38.6 46.6 43.0 42.8 61.8 34.7 46.3 38.5 26.7 17.7 LOS by Move: D C D D D D E C D D C B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 3 11 0 4 3 5 7 10 12 16 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 8-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.524 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.5 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 78 525 3 77 703 258 151 17 72 4 11 53 Added Vol: 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 PasserByVol: 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 Initial Fut: 78 529 17 110 699 258 151 19 72 15 13 72 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 83 563 18 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 14 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 83 563 18 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 14 77 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 83 563 18 117 744 274 161 20 77 16 14 77 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.87 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.46 0.54 2.00 0.21 0.79 1.00 0.15 0.85 Final Sat.: 1805 3480 112 1805 2531 934 3502 349 1324 1805 254 1405 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.56 0.56 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.10 0.10 Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.52 0.52 Delay/Veh: 46.8 17.3 17.3 36.1 13.9 13.9 45.3 42.7 42.7 44.1 45.4 45.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 46.8 17.3 17.3 36.1 13.9 13.9 45.3 42.7 42.7 44.1 45.4 45.4 LOS by Move: D B B D B B D D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 10 10 3 3 3 1 3 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 9-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.4] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 593 16 0 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 602 16 0 805 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 640 17 0 856 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 640 17 0 856 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 329 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 673 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 673 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.4 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.4 ApproachLOS: * * * B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.537 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.6 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 59 0 127 64 350 423 420 82 4 283 154 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 59 0 129 64 355 430 420 82 4 283 156 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 63 0 139 69 382 462 452 88 4 304 168 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1355 1900 1900 1362 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.24 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.19 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.38 0.16 0.02 0.44 0.54 Delay/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.3 33.4 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 38.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 16.2 16.2 0.0 17.6 16.3 21.3 33.4 25.6 23.7 40.1 35.9 38.1 LOS by Move: B B A B B C C C C D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 3 1 8 7 6 2 0 5 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 11-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 8.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 58 0 Added Vol: 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 38 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 102 45 2 58 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 187 187 125 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 147 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 807 712 932 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1447 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 806 711 932 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1447 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.04 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 810 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: 9.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Existing + Project PM Sat May 10, 2014 16:15:25 Page 14-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Existing + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 58 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 60 0 0 121 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 124 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 933 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 933 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Cumulative Plus Project with Walters Road driveway
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:22 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Cumulative + Project AM
Command: Cumulative + Project AM
Volume: Cumulative AM
Geometry: Cumulative
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: AM
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:22 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for AM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of
# Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:22 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Existing
To Gates
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:22 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450
Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95
Total 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 5545
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960
Added 1 39 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 3 17 118
Total 131 879 10 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 53 187 3078
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996
Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32
Total 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2028
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380
Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29
Total 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193 3409
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340
Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11
Total 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 351
#6 Walters / Project Dvy.
Base 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987
Added 0 0 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 72
Total 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2059
#7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340
Added 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 35 3 0 0 84
Total 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0 424
#8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
Base 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340
Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 19
Total 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 359
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base F 91.1 1.172 F 96.4 1.189 + 5.380 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor C 32.2 0.889 C 34.5 0.906 + 2.289 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter B 12.4 0.015 B 12.5 0.022 + 0.125 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 D 38.0 0.938 D 38.9 0.946 + 0.819 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.7 0.254 A 9.7 0.257 + 0.020 D/V
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 B 12.5 0.077 +12.487 D/V
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 B 11.0 0.058 +10.955 D/V
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.8 0.007 + 8.800 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No
# 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=10]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2028]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 2018
Minor Approach Volume: 10
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 43 [less than minimum of 100]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.7]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=243]
SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=351]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 108
Minor Approach Volume: 243
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 813
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=40]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2059]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 2019
Minor Approach Volume: 40
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 43 [less than minimum of 100]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0
ApproachDel: 11.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=39]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=424]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 385
Minor Approach Volume: 39
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 474
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.8 xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=7]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=359]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 7-10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 352
Minor Approach Volume: 7
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 498
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.189
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 96.4
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30
Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30
User Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.41 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.15 0.15
Volume/Cap: 1.19 0.36 0.53 0.53 0.35 1.19 1.19 0.97 0.96 0.97 1.19 0.11
Delay/Veh: 163.8 23.9 26.8 58.2 30.7 143.1 160.0 80.0 93.1 79.7 155 45.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 163.8 23.9 26.8 58.2 30.7 143.1 160.0 80.0 93.1 79.7 155 45.7
LOS by Move: F C C E C F F E F E F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 22 7 10 4 7 41 27 17 14 16 23 1
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 8-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.906
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.5
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170
Added Vol: 1 39 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 3 17
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 131 879 10 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 53 187
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 142 955 11 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 58 203
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 142 955 11 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 58 203
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 142 955 11 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 58 203
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.88 0.88
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.40 0.60 2.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.22 0.78
Final Sat.: 1805 3562 41 1805 2416 1032 3502 341 1333 1805 370 1307
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.17
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.43 0.43 0.23 0.91 0.91
Delay/Veh: 81.5 18.9 18.9 41.2 28.9 28.9 61.8 30.6 30.6 33.9 62.5 62.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 81.5 18.9 18.9 41.2 28.9 28.9 61.8 30.6 30.6 33.9 62.5 62.5
LOS by Move: F B B D C C E C C C E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 10 10 3 19 19 7 3 3 1 10 10
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 9-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.5]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Added Vol: 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 0 1078 10 0 1105 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 1078 10 0 1105 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 544
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.5
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.5
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.946
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.9
Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190
Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.61 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1343 1900 1615 1161 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.11 0.02 0.54 0.04 0.22 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.01 0.14 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.15 0.15
Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.19 0.04 0.95 0.07 0.38 0.95 0.88 0.34 0.11 0.95 0.87
Delay/Veh: 11.0 9.0 8.1 39.7 8.3 10.4 63.6 41.4 27.5 38.8 61.6 62.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 11.0 9.0 8.1 39.7 8.3 10.4 63.6 41.4 27.5 38.8 61.6 62.0
LOS by Move: B A A D A B E D C D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 3 0 16 1 5 10 13 3 0 11 8
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 11-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 12-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.26 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 1.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.5]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 501
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 521
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 521
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.5
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.5
ApproachLOS: * * * B
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.0]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0
Added Vol: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 35 3 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 371 371 125 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 142 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 634 562 932 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1453 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 633 561 932 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1453 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 644 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 11.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * B * * * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 11.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:24:24 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 106 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 954 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 954 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.8 xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * A *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:20 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Cumulative + Project PM
Command: Cumulative + Project PM
Volume: Cumulative PM
Geometry: Cumulative
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: PM
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:20 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of
# Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 1.00 Mixed Use 45.00 36.00 45 36 81 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 45 36 81 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .................................................. 45 36 81 100.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:20 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Existing
To Gates
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:20 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
PM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 6840
Added 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 54
Total 373 740 791 40 790 350 570 1000 376 484 1250 130 6894
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 3950
Added 0 16 0 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 1 7 62
PassBy 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7
Total 190 1326 10 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 21 60 4019
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2962
Added 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18
Total 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2980
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 4550
Added 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 16
Total 160 110 20 302 200 625 467 700 290 40 880 772 4566
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 190
Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8
Total 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 198
#6 Walters / Project Dvy.
Base 0 1510 0 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2940
Added 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 35
PassBy 0 -3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 2975
#7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0 190
Added 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 26 2 0 0 50
PassBy 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 11
Total 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0 251
#8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
Base 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190
Added 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 11
Total 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 201
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base F 164.0 1.510 F 167.3 1.519 + 3.314 D/V
# 2 Walters / Tabor D 46.6 0.985 D 47.3 0.993 + 0.771 D/V
# 3 Walters / Gunter C 16.4 0.007 C 16.6 0.014 + 0.167 D/V
# 4 Walters / SR 12 E 75.6 1.225 E 77.2 1.233 + 1.578 D/V
# 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.8 0.085 A 8.8 0.087 + 0.009 D/V
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 C 15.7 0.048 +15.724 D/V
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 A 9.7 0.030 + 9.742 D/V
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.8 0.003 + 8.823 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Warrant Summary Report
Intersection Base Met Future Met
[Del / Vol] [Del / Vol]
# 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No
# 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 6 Walters / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
# 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No
# 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2980]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 2976
Minor Approach Volume: 4
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -91 [less than minimum of 100]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0
ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=82]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=198]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 116
Minor Approach Volume: 82
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 794
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2975]
SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Vol: 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 2958
Minor Approach Volume: 17
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -89 [less than minimum of 100]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=24]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=251]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 227
Minor Approach Volume: 24
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 615
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.8 xxxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=3]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.
Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=201]
FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 7-10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Vol: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Major Street Volume: 198
Minor Approach Volume: 3
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 651
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an
"indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting
a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant
are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based
signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).
The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace
a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible
jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond
the scope of this software, may yield different results.
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.519
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 167.3
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130
Added Vol: 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 373 740 791 40 790 350 570 1000 376 484 1250 130
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.53 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.15 0.38 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.31 0.31 0.15 0.24 0.24
Volume/Cap: 1.22 0.65 1.56 0.60 1.22 1.20 1.56 0.98 0.82 0.98 1.56 0.36
Delay/Veh: 162.5 29.3 296.0 60.7 150 158.5 305.3 56.9 43.0 76.2 298 32.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 162.5 29.3 296.0 60.7 150 158.5 305.3 56.9 43.0 76.2 298 32.2
LOS by Move: F C F E F F F E D E F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 11 63 2 27 23 48 24 14 13 55 4
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 8-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.993
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 47.3
Optimal Cycle: 171 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50
Added Vol: 0 16 0 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 1 7
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3
Initial Fut: 190 1326 10 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 21 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 207 1441 11 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 23 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 207 1441 11 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 23 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 207 1441 11 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 23 65
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.89 0.89
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.57 0.43 2.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.26 0.74
Final Sat.: 1805 3579 27 1805 2739 755 3502 379 1301 1805 438 1251
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.11 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.07
Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.61 0.61 0.19 0.74 0.74
Delay/Veh: 111.4 19.3 19.3 63.1 49.6 49.6 86.2 43.9 43.9 45.0 68.0 68.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 111.4 19.3 19.3 63.1 49.6 49.6 86.2 43.9 43.9 45.0 68.0 68.0
LOS by Move: F B B E D D F D D D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 18 18 3 30 30 14 5 5 1 4 4
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 9-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.6]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Gunter
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 0 1651 22 0 1562 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 1651 22 0 1562 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 836
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 314
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 314
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 16.6
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * C
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.6
ApproachLOS: * * * C
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 11-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.233
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 77.2
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters SR 12
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770
Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 160 110 20 302 200 625 467 700 290 40 880 772
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.52 1.00 0.85 0.66 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 996 1900 1615 1258 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.26 0.11 0.42 0.14 0.21 0.20 0.02 0.26 0.52
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.42 0.42
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.18 0.04 0.77 0.34 1.23 1.23 0.47 0.43 0.28 0.63 1.23
Delay/Veh: 27.6 23.3 22.0 37.4 24.8 153.0 168.6 19.2 19.0 43.8 23.6 146.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 27.6 23.3 22.0 37.4 24.8 153.0 168.6 19.2 19.0 43.8 23.6 146.4
LOS by Move: C C C D C F F B B D C F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 3 0 8 5 35 17 9 7 2 13 47
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 11-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 12-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8]
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Charleston Tabor
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Volume: 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del: 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 13-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #6 Walters / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 15.7]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1510 0 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1510 0 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
PasserByVol: 0 -3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 1507 14 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 761
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 353
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 353
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.7
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * C
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.7
ApproachLOS: * * * C
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 14-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0
Added Vol: 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 26 2 0 0
PasserByVol: 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 30 2 80 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 214 214 130 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 145 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 779 687 925 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1450 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 778 686 925 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1450 xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 783 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * A * * * * * * * A * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Sun Apr 20, 2014 15:14:22 Page 15-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Cumulative + Project
PM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
********************************************************************************
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8]
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 114 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 945 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 945 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.8 xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * A *
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Cumulative Plus Project without Walters Road driveway
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:40 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Cumulative + Project AM Command: Cumulative + Project AM Volume: Cumulative AM Geometry: Cumulative Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: AM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:40 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:40 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips Existing To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:40 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report AM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450 Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95 Total 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 5545 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960 Added 0 17 15 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 4 39 133 Total 130 857 25 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 54 209 3093 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996 Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 49 Total 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 2045 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380 Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29 Total 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193 3409 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340 Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 Total 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 351 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Total 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340 Added 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 49 3 0 0 121 Total 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 461 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 35 Total 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 375 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base F 91.1 1.172 F 96.4 1.189 + 5.380 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor C 32.3 0.876 D 36.6 0.911 + 4.299 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter B 12.4 0.015 B 12.8 0.060 + 0.428 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 D 38.0 0.938 D 38.9 0.946 + 0.819 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 9.7 0.254 A 9.7 0.257 + 0.020 D/V # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 B 11.3 0.096 +11.296 D/V # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.9 0.024 + 8.865 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No # 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=27] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2045] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 2018 Minor Approach Volume: 27 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 43 [less than minimum of 100] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.7] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=243] SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=351] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 108 Minor Approach Volume: 243 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 813 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 ApproachDel: 11.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=62] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=461] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 399 Minor Approach Volume: 62 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 464 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=23] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=375] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 7-8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 352 Minor Approach Volume: 23 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 498 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.189 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 96.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 User Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 377 570 374 83 442 662 423 607 268 605 662 28 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.41 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.15 0.15 Volume/Cap: 1.19 0.36 0.53 0.53 0.35 1.19 1.19 0.97 0.96 0.97 1.19 0.11 Delay/Veh: 163.8 23.9 26.8 58.2 30.7 143.1 160.0 80.0 93.1 79.7 155 45.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 163.8 23.9 26.8 58.2 30.7 143.1 160.0 80.0 93.1 79.7 155 45.7 LOS by Move: F C C E C F F E F E F D HCM2kAvgQ: 22 7 10 4 7 41 27 17 14 16 23 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 8-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.911 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 36.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 Added Vol: 0 17 15 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 4 39 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 130 857 25 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 54 209 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 141 932 27 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 59 227 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 141 932 27 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 59 227 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 141 932 27 117 967 413 315 25 98 40 59 227 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.40 0.60 2.00 0.20 0.80 1.00 0.21 0.79 Final Sat.: 1805 3494 102 1805 2416 1032 3502 341 1333 1805 344 1330 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.19 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh: 85.4 20.2 20.2 43.4 30.8 30.8 65.1 31.5 31.5 35.5 63.0 63.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 85.4 20.2 20.2 43.4 30.8 30.8 65.1 31.5 31.5 35.5 63.0 63.0 LOS by Move: F C C D C C E C C D E E HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 3 20 20 7 3 3 1 11 11 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 9-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Added Vol: 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 1078 10 0 1105 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1078 10 0 1105 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 544 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.06 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.8 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.946 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 337 207 33 624 76 351 466 750 130 11 511 210 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.61 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1343 1900 1615 1161 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.11 0.02 0.54 0.04 0.22 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.01 0.14 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.15 0.15 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.19 0.04 0.95 0.07 0.38 0.95 0.88 0.34 0.11 0.95 0.87 Delay/Veh: 11.0 9.0 8.1 39.7 8.3 10.4 63.6 41.4 27.5 38.8 61.6 62.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.0 9.0 8.1 39.7 8.3 10.4 63.6 41.4 27.5 38.8 61.6 62.0 LOS by Move: B A A D A B E D C D E E HCM2kAvgQ: 5 3 0 16 1 5 10 13 3 0 11 8 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 11-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.26 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.3] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 Added Vol: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 49 3 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 378 378 132 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 156 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 628 557 923 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1436 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 627 556 923 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1436 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 634 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: 11.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project AM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:32:42 Page 14-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 106 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 954 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 954 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:34 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Cumulative + Project PM Command: Cumulative + Project PM Volume: Cumulative PM Geometry: Cumulative Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: PM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:34 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for PM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 1.00 Mixed Use 45.00 36.00 45 36 81 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 45 36 81 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL .................................................. 45 36 81 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:34 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips Existing To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:34 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report PM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 6840 Added 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 54 Total 373 740 791 40 790 350 570 1000 376 484 1250 130 6894 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 3950 Added 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 74 PassBy 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7 Total 190 1314 24 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 22 69 4031 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2962 Added 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 25 Total 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2987 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 4550 Added 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 16 Total 160 110 20 302 200 625 467 700 290 40 880 772 4566 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 190 Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 Total 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 198 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Total 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0 190 Added 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 38 2 0 0 71 PassBy 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 14 Total 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 275 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 Added 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 18 Total 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 208 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base F 155.3 1.455 F 158.2 1.463 + 2.889 D/V # 2 Walters / Tabor E 59.9 1.035 E 60.2 1.050 + 0.307 D/V # 3 Walters / Gunter C 16.4 0.007 C 16.9 0.038 + 0.458 D/V # 4 Walters / SR 12 E 77.4 1.256 E 79.1 1.264 + 1.641 D/V # 5 Charleston / Tabor A 8.8 0.085 A 8.8 0.087 + 0.009 D/V # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor A 0.0 0.000 A 9.9 0.042 + 9.858 D/V # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. A 0.0 0.000 A 8.9 0.011 + 8.852 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Warrant Summary Report Intersection Base Met Future Met [Del / Vol] [Del / Vol] # 3 Walters / Gunter ??? / ??? No / No # 5 Charleston / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ??? / ??? No / No # 8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ??? / ??? No / No Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=11] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=2987] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 2976 Minor Approach Volume: 11 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -91 [less than minimum of 100] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=82] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=2][total volume=198] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 116 Minor Approach Volume: 82 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 794 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 ApproachDel: 9.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=33] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=275] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 242 Minor Approach Volume: 33 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 598 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0] FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=10] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=208] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 7-8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 198 Minor Approach Volume: 10 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 651 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 8-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.463 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 158.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 Added Vol: 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 373 740 791 40 790 350 570 1000 376 484 1250 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 405 804 860 43 859 380 620 1087 409 526 1359 141 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.53 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.15 0.38 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.25 0.25 Volume/Cap: 1.19 0.62 1.49 0.75 1.19 1.18 1.49 0.93 0.79 0.93 1.49 0.35 Delay/Veh: 161.0 34.2 270.0 102.2 148 157.1 281.3 54.7 46.2 74.8 273 38.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 161.0 34.2 270.0 102.2 148 157.1 281.3 54.7 46.2 74.8 273 38.8 LOS by Move: F C F F F F F D D E F D HCM2kAvgQ: 23 13 66 3 29 25 50 26 16 14 57 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 8-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 9-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.050 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.2 Optimal Cycle: 178 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 Added Vol: 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 PasserByVol: 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 Initial Fut: 190 1314 24 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 22 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.57 0.43 2.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.24 0.76 Final Sat.: 1805 3535 65 1805 2739 755 3502 379 1301 1805 407 1276 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.09 0.09 Volume/Cap: 1.10 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.64 0.64 0.16 0.67 0.67 Delay/Veh: 129.7 19.6 19.6 64.9 74.8 74.8 104.8 37.7 37.7 34.9 46.8 46.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 129.7 19.6 19.6 64.9 74.8 74.8 104.8 37.7 37.7 34.9 46.8 46.8 LOS by Move: F B B E E E F D D C D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 17 17 3 32 32 13 5 5 1 4 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 9-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Walters / Gunter ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Gunter Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 1651 22 0 1562 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1651 22 0 1562 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 836 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 314 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 314 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 16.9 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.9 ApproachLOS: * * * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Walters / SR 12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.264 Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 79.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters SR 12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 160 110 20 302 200 625 467 700 290 40 880 772 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 174 120 22 328 217 679 508 761 315 43 957 839 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.53 1.00 0.85 0.67 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1013 1900 1615 1281 1900 1615 3502 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.26 0.11 0.42 0.14 0.21 0.20 0.02 0.26 0.52 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.41 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.19 0.04 0.77 0.34 1.26 1.26 0.49 0.45 0.25 0.64 1.26 Delay/Veh: 24.2 20.3 19.2 33.8 21.7 161.3 174.8 17.7 17.6 36.4 21.0 155.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.2 20.3 19.2 33.8 21.7 161.3 174.8 17.7 17.6 36.4 21.0 155.5 LOS by Move: C C B C C F F B B D C F HCM2kAvgQ: 4 2 0 7 4 34 16 8 6 1 11 46 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 11-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Charleston / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Charleston Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1029 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 8.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 13-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0 Added Vol: 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 38 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 222 222 138 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 160 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 771 681 916 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1432 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 770 680 916 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1432 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.04 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 774 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: 9.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Cumulative + Project PM Tue Apr 29, 2014 19:23:36 Page 14-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Cumulative + Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 114 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 945 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 945 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project with Walters driveway
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:36 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Mit CMPP AM
Command: MitCMPPAM
Volume: Cumulative AM
Geometry: Mitigation
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: AM
Trip Distribution: Existing
Paths: Existing
Routes: Existing
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:36 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for AM
Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of
# Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total
---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- -----
1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0
Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:36 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips Existing
To Gates
1 2 3 4 5 6
Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:36 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Walters / Air Base
Base 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450
Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95
Total 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 5545
#2 Walters / Tabor
Base 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960
Added 1 39 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 3 17 118
Total 131 879 10 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 53 187 3078
#3 Walters / Gunter
Base 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996
Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32
Total 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2028
#4 Walters / SR 12
Base 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380
Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29
Total 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193 3409
#5 Charleston / Tabor
Base 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340
Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11
Total 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 351
#6 Walters / Project Dvy.
Base 0 987 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987
Added 0 0 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 72
Total 0 987 15 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2059
#7 Project Dvy. / Tabor
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340
Added 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 35 3 0 0 84
Total 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 35 3 240 0 424
#8 Charleston / Project Dvy.
Base 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340
Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 19
Total 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 359
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:37 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 1 Walters / Air Base D 49.5 0.842 D 50.8 0.859 + 1.247 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:37 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.859
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 50.8
Optimal Cycle: 113 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Street Name: Walters Air Base
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30
Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30
User Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1900 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.00 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.27 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.21 0.21
Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.49 0.72 0.72 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.86 0.08
Delay/Veh: 60.8 34.5 42.2 77.0 66.0 0.0 57.3 46.0 48.6 45.5 56.9 39.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.8 34.5 42.2 77.0 66.0 0.0 57.3 46.0 48.6 45.5 56.9 39.4
LOS by Move: E C D E E A E D D D E D
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 9 12 5 11 0 18 12 10 12 16 1
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Sun Apr 20, 2014 16:17:37 Page 6-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zephyr Estates
Mitigation - Cumulative + Project
AM Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Transportation Impact Study for Zephyr Estates
May 12, 2014
Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project without Walters driveway
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:05 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Mit CMPP AM Command: MitCMPPAM Volume: Cumulative AM Geometry: Mitigation Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: AM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:05 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Generation Report Forecast for AM Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total ---- ------------ ------- -------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 1.00 Mixed Use 59.00 85.00 59 85 144 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 59 85 144 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL .................................................. 59 85 144 100.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:05 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips Existing To Gates 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zone ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 35.0 30.0 10.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:05 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report AM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 5450 Added 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 95 Total 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 5545 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 130 840 10 70 890 380 290 20 90 20 50 170 2960 Added 0 17 15 38 0 0 0 3 0 17 4 39 133 Total 130 857 25 108 890 380 290 23 90 37 54 209 3093 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 980 9 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1996 Added 0 12 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 49 Total 0 992 9 0 1017 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 2045 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 310 190 30 570 70 310 420 690 120 10 470 190 3380 Added 0 0 0 4 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 3 29 Total 310 190 30 574 70 323 429 690 120 10 470 193 3409 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 340 Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 Total 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 351 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Total 0 31 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 240 0 340 Added 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 49 3 0 0 121 Total 60 0 2 0 0 0 0 107 49 3 240 0 461 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 240 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 Added 0 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 35 Total 0 243 0 0 102 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 375 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:06 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 Walters / Air Base D 49.5 0.842 D 50.8 0.859 + 1.247 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:06 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Walters / Air Base ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 125 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.859 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 50.8 Optimal Cycle: 113 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Air Base Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 380 620 380 90 480 720 460 660 270 640 720 30 Added Vol: 30 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 410 620 406 90 480 720 460 660 291 658 720 30 User Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 377 570 374 83 442 0 423 607 268 605 662 28 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1900 1805 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.12 0.00 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.27 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.21 0.21 Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.49 0.72 0.72 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.86 0.08 Delay/Veh: 60.8 34.5 42.2 77.0 66.0 0.0 57.3 46.0 48.6 45.5 56.9 39.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 60.8 34.5 42.2 77.0 66.0 0.0 57.3 46.0 48.6 45.5 56.9 39.4 LOS by Move: E C D E E A E D D D E D HCM2kAvgQ: 14 9 12 5 11 0 18 12 10 12 16 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP AM Mon May 12, 2014 11:26:06 Page 6-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative + Project AM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP PM Mon May 12, 2014 11:24:29 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Mit CMPP PM Command: MitCMPPPM Volume: Cumulative PM Geometry: Mitigation Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: PM Trip Distribution: Existing Paths: Existing Routes: Existing Configuration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP PM Mon May 12, 2014 11:24:29 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Turning Movement Report PM Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #1 Walters / Air Base Base 360 740 780 40 790 350 570 1000 360 470 1250 130 6840 Added 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 54 Total 373 740 791 40 790 350 570 1000 376 484 1250 130 6894 #2 Walters / Tabor Base 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 3950 Added 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 74 PassBy 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7 Total 190 1314 24 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 22 69 4031 #3 Walters / Gunter Base 0 1510 20 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2962 Added 0 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 25 Total 0 1519 20 0 1437 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 2987 #4 Walters / SR 12 Base 160 110 20 300 200 620 460 700 290 40 880 770 4550 Added 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 2 16 Total 160 110 20 302 200 625 467 700 290 40 880 772 4566 #5 Charleston / Tabor Base 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 190 Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 Total 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 198 #6 Walters / Project Dvy. Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Total 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 #7 Project Dvy. / Tabor Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 80 0 190 Added 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 38 2 0 0 71 PassBy 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 14 Total 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 115 45 2 80 0 275 #8 Charleston / Project Dvy. Base 0 80 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 Added 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 18 Total 0 82 0 0 111 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 208 Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP PM Mon May 12, 2014 11:24:30 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 2 Walters / Tabor C 31.9 0.878 C 33.4 0.894 + 1.481 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP PM Mon May 12, 2014 11:24:30 Page 4-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Walters / Tabor ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.894 Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.4 Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Walters Tabor Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 190 1310 10 70 1310 360 480 30 110 10 20 50 Added Vol: 0 7 11 29 0 0 0 2 0 7 2 16 PasserByVol: 0 -3 3 4 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 Initial Fut: 190 1314 24 103 1306 360 480 32 110 21 22 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 207 1428 26 112 1420 391 522 35 120 23 24 75 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.23 0.77 1.00 0.24 0.76 Final Sat.: 1805 3535 65 1805 3610 1615 3502 379 1301 1805 407 1276 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.24 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.48 0.48 0.07 0.43 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.09 0.09 Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.57 0.92 0.57 0.57 0.14 0.67 0.67 Delay/Veh: 73.8 22.4 22.4 73.5 31.1 18.5 53.7 33.8 33.8 34.1 46.8 46.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 73.8 22.4 22.4 73.5 31.1 18.5 53.7 33.8 33.8 34.1 46.8 46.8 LOS by Move: E C C E C B D C C C D D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 18 18 3 16 7 10 4 4 1 4 4 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
Mit CMPP PM Mon May 12, 2014 11:24:30 Page 4-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zephyr Estates Mitigation - Cumulative Plus Project PM Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, SACRAMENTO
top related