www.mahidol.ac.th mu deans meeting 24 september 2014 official announcement: 16 september 2014 qs...

Post on 29-Jan-2016

220 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

www.mahidol.ac.th

MU Deans Meeting24 September 2014

Official Announcement: 16 September 2014

www.topuniversities.com

QS WORLD UNIVERSITY

RANKING 2014

www.mahidol.ac.th

QS ASIA – Indicators & Weights

30%

20%

10%

5%

5%

15%

FT = full-time; Exc = exchange

www.mahidol.ac.th

QS World – Indicators & Weights

40%20%

20%

10%

5%

5%

www.mahidol.ac.th

QS World – MU Position 2006 - 2013

www.mahidol.ac.th

QS World 2014 – MU Score per Indicators

21.1/40

16.88/20

2.74/20

3.56/10

0.71/5

0.44/5

45.43

www.mahidol.ac.th

MU Key Indicators: 2012 vs 2013

Indicators 2011

(229)

2011

score

2012

(255)

2012

score

2013

(283)

2013

score

2014

(257)

2014

score

F/S ratio (20%)

1:7.0

84.5 1:7.2

82 1:7.6 79.1 1:7 84.4

Citation/faculty (20%) 6.6 11.4 7.4 10.8 8.4 12.7 9.7 13.7

% Inter staff (5%)

6.1%

16.4 5.1%

12.9 5.6% 14.3 5.8%

14.2

% Inter students (5%)

2.6%

7.8 2.8%

7.5 2.9% 7.5 3.6%

8.8

Academic review (40%)

53.2 48.6 47.8 52.6

Employer review (10%)

5.8 21.9 29.2 35.6

Overall score 43.1 41.6 41.6 45.5

www.mahidol.ac.th

Interesting Issues

• All indicators are with positive trends, esp. survey results

• Competition is getting tougher / wider– 2011: Score 43.1 Ranked 229– 2014: Score 45.5 -> Ranked 257–↑↑ No. of universities joining rankings–↑↑ No. / scope of reviewers– Exponential growth in performance of others• East Asia, South America, Middle East

* For position 401-700, ranked in group; detailed data available in QS WUR Supplement & excel file

www.mahidol.ac.th

Thai Universities in Top 800 QS World 2013/14

Institute 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Chula 243 239 201 171 180

Mahidol 257 283 255 229 228

Chiangmai 501-550 551-600 501-550 501-550 401-450

Thammasat 601-650 601-650 551-600 501-550 451-500

Kasetsart 651-700 651-700 601+ 551-600 501-600

Khon Kaen 701+ 701+ 601+ 601+ 551-600

KMUTT 701+ 701+ 601+ 601+ -

PSU 701+ 701+ 601+ 601+ 501-550

www.mahidol.ac.th

ChulalongkornChulalongkorn

MahidolMahidol

www.mahidol.ac.th

ASEAN Universities in Top 400 QS World 2013/14

No Institute Country

2013 2012 2011

1 NUS 24 25 28

2 NTU 41= 47 58

3 U. of Malaya 167 156 167

4 Chulalongkorn 239 201 171

5 UKM 269= 261 279

6 Mahidol 283 255 229

7 U Indonesia 309= 273 217

8 U Sains Malaysia

355= 326 335

9 U Teknologi M. 355= 358 >401

10 U Philippines 380= 348 332

www.mahidol.ac.th

ASEAN Universities in Top 400 QS World 2014/15

No Institute Country

2014 2013 2012 2011

1 NUS 22 24 25 28

2 NTU 39 41= 47 58

3 U. of Malaya 151 167 156 167

4 Chulalongkorn 243 239 201 171

5 Mahidol 257 283 255 229

6 UKM 259 269= 261 279

7 U Teknologi M. 294 355= 358 >401

8 U Sains Malaysia

309 355= 326 335

9 U Indonesia 310 309= 273 217

10 U Philippines 367 380= 348 332

www.mahidol.ac.th

QS WORLD: MU vs Malaysia

Indicator MU257

UM151

UKM259

UTM294

USM309

Overall score 45.5 61 45.4 41.9 41

Academic Rep. (40%)

52.6 64.4 52.1 40.5 55.3

Employer Rep. (10%)

35.6 64 39.5 37.6 46.4

F/S Ratio (20%)

84.4 93.1 60.4 70.5 39.9

Citation/F (20%)

13.7 11.1 7.9 4.3 17.4

Inter Faculty (5%)

14.2 79.2 95.1 60.6 24.5

Inter Student (5%)

8.8 77 42.5 76.7 30

www.mahidol.ac.th

Issue for Consideration

• Collaborative effort in data collection– Online collection started Oct 2014

• Need more efforts for better results on academic & employer survey– Start pre-survey @ faculty level Nov 2014

• University wide effort – research output both volume & quality– Increase internationalization activities

positive impact on academic survey – Engagement with employer & alumni

www.mahidol.ac.th

www.mahidol.ac.th

www.mahidol.ac.th

5 Major Faculty Areas

Arts & Humanities

Social Sciences & Management

Life Sciences & Medicine

Academic Review

Employer Review

Citation/paper

Engineering & Technology

Natural Sciences

40% 10% 50% 40% 20% 40%40% 30% 30%50% 30% 20%60% 20% 20%

2004 - 2012

www.mahidol.ac.th

5 Major Faculty Areas

Arts & Humanities

Social Sciences & Management

Life Sciences & Medicine

Academic Review

Employer Review

Citation/paper H-index

Engineering & Technology

Natural Sciences

40% 10% 25% 25% 40% 20% 20% 20% 40% 30% 15% 15% 50% 30% 10%10% 60% 20% 10%10%

2013

www.mahidol.ac.th

MU Positions: 5 Faculty Areas

2010 - 2013

www.mahidol.ac.th

MU Positions: 5 Faculty Areas

2010 - 2014

www.mahidol.ac.th

Life Sciences & Medicine: Asia 2013University Rank University Rank

NUS 1 Tokyo Med/Dent 11

Tokyo 2 Tsinghua 12

U. of Hong Kong 3 Keio 13

Kyoto 4 Kyushu 14

Osaka 5 Nagoya 15

National Taiwan U 6 Tohoku 16

Seoul NU 7 Yonsei 17

Peking 8 Mahidol 18

CUHK 9 Hokkaido 19

Fudan 10 N. Yang Ming U 20

www.mahidol.ac.th

Life Sciences & Medicine: Asia 2014University Country World Asia

Tokyo 26 1

National U Singapore 27 2

Kyoto 40 3

U. of Hong Kong 46 4

Seoul National U 58 5

Osaka 61 6

Chinese UHK 77 7

Peking 82 8

National Taiwan U 83 9

Mahidol* 117 10* Same position as Fudan University, CU @ 32th

www.mahidol.ac.th

MU vs Other World Class Universities: University Country World

Mahidol Thailand 117

Tohoku University Japan 119

U. of Liverpool UK 125

Princeton USA 131

Case Western Reserve U

USA 135

U. of Aberdeen UK 136

U. of Illinois @ Chicago USA 137

Penn State U USA 139

U. of Texas @ Austin USA 159

Universite Paris-Sud 11 France 173

Purdue University USA 178

Mayo Medical School USA 208

Life Sciences

& Medicine

www.mahidol.ac.th

New Ranking Criteria: 2015• Research data: – Introduction of citation normalization on

five broad faculty areas then, adjusted by number of staff (hybrid model)

• Employability:– Development & introduction of “Global

Employability Index” – New set of data will be collected

www.mahidol.ac.th

Faculty Area: MU Scores

Life sciences Social Sciences

Rank 117 374

Score (100)

71.3 60.5

Academic(L:40, S: 50)

73.8 55.2

Employer(L:10, S:30)

84.5 70.9

Citations(L:25, S:10)

75.3 72.6

H-index(L:25, S:10)

57.8 43.9

www.mahidol.ac.th

Faculty Area Ranking: MU vs CU

Mahidol

Life sciences 117

Social sciences 374

Engineering /Tech 401+

Natural sciences 401+

Arts & humanities 401+

Chula

248

127

123

281

401+

www.mahidol.ac.th

SCIMAGO Institutions RankingsDeveloped by Scimago Lab

Data source: Scopus

www.mahidol.ac.th

SCIMAGO Institution RankingSCIMAGO Institution Ranking

• Ranked over 5,100 institutions• Broad range of institution types– 2,782 higher education – 1,272 governmental organizations– 857 health (hospitals)– 274 private/other types of organizations

• Rank 3 aspects– Research, Innovation & Web Visibility

www.mahidol.ac.th

Ranking Criteria

• Output• Inter collaboration• Normalized impact• High quality pubs• Specialization index• Excellence rate• Scientific leadership • Excellence with

leadership • Scientific talent pool

ResearchResearch InnovationInnovation

Web VisibilityWeb Visibility

• Innovative Knowledge• Technological impact

• Web size• Domain’s inbound links

www.mahidol.ac.th

Research Ranking: OutputInstitution Institution

1 Chula 479 13 Mahasarakam 2155

2 Mahidol 519 14 Ramathibodi 2170

3 Chiangmai 878 15 NSTDA 2244

4 Kasetsart 1044 16 Naresuan 2265

5 PSU 1164 17 NECTEC 2266

6 KKU 1180 18 NCGEB 2278

7 KMUTL 1281 19 Silpakorn 2363

8 KMUTT 1282 20 MOPH 2404

9 Thammasart 1575 21 Srinakarinwirot 2467

10 Siriraj 1652 22 NMMTC 2611

11 AIT 1829 23 Mae Fa Luang 2777

12 Suranaree 1928 24 COEM 2846

www.mahidol.ac.th

SCIMAGO Institution RankingSCIMAGO Institution Ranking• Research ranking of MU– Output: 519 (No. 2 in TH – exc.

SI/RA)– Talent pool: 351 (No.1 in TH)– Leadership: 920

• Innovation ranking of MU– Innovative knowledge: 240 (No.1 in TH)– Technological impact: 336 (No.13 in TH)

• Web visibility: 292 (No.6 in TH)

www.mahidol.ac.th

Summary of 2014• ↑ trend for MU on most key indicators

• Highest position ever for life science &

medicine in Asia with the new, tougher

criteria

– Mahidol is proudly now in the TOP TEN

• New methodology next year major shift in

position is expected

• New data set will most likely be required.

• Need strong collaboration university wide

top related