what is supply chain excellence? a closer look at industry performance

Post on 29-May-2015

1.490 Views

Category:

Business

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Analysis of industry progress on three intersections of the Effective Frontier: Revenue/Employee versus Inventory Turns Inventory Turns versus Cash-To-Cash Inventory Turns versus Operating Margin

TRANSCRIPT

Defining Supply Chain Excellence

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 2

Understanding Supply Chain Excellence

The Fundamentals

Progress by Industry

Comparison of Companies within a Peer Group

Recommendations

Wrap-up

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 3

The Supply Chain

is a Complex System

with Complex Processes

with Increasing Complexity

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 4

The Supply Chain Effective Frontier

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 5

Methodology: Mining 20 Years of Financial Data to Understand the Patterns

Financial Metrics

Growth Profitability Cycle ComplexityCommon Shares Cash Cash-to-Cash Cycle Altman Z

Employee Growth Cash Change in Period Days of Finished Goods Capital Turnover

Employees Cash on Hand Days of Inventory Current Ratio

Market Capitalization Cash Ratio TTM Days of Payables Outstanding Quick Ratio

R&D Margin Cash Ratio Quarter Days of Raw Materials Return on Assets

R&D Ratio Cash Ratio Year Days of Sales Outstanding Return on Equity

R&D to COGS Ratio Cost of Goods Sold Days of Work in Progress Return on Invested Capital

Revenue EBITDA DPO/DSO Return on Net Assets

Revenue Growth Free Cash Flow Ratio Finished Goods Inventory Revenue per Employee

Revenue Growth TTM Gross Margin Inventory Working Capital Ratio

Revenue TTM Gross Profit Inventory Turns

SG&A Margin Net Profit Margin Receivables Turns

SG&A Ratio Operating Cash Flow Ratio Raw Materials Inventory

SG&A to COGS Ratio Operating Margin Work in Progress Inventory

OPEX Ratio

Pretax Margin

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 6

Operating Margins versus Cycles

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 7

The Change Management Journey

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 8

As companies mature progress is seen in:• Strength: Year-over-year improvement in metrics.• Balance: Balance in growth, profitability, cycles and

profitability.• Resiliency: A tight, predictable pattern in results at

the intersection of operating margin and inventory turns irrespective of what is happening in buy or sell-side markets.

What Does Good Look Like?

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 9

Most Interesting Patterns

• Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns

• Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin

• Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 10

What Have We Learned?

• Each industry has a different pattern of trade-offs of balancing growth, profitability, cycles and complexity.

• Companies that are supply chain leaders have very small movement with a balanced portfolio of metrics.

• It is about MUCH more than Return on Assets (ROA), growth and inventory.

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 11

Understanding Supply Chain Excellence

The Fundamentals

Progress by Industry

Comparison of Companies within a Peer Group

Recommendations

Wrap-up

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 12

Where Are We by Industry?

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 13

Progress in Manufacturing Productivity

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 14

Productivity in Retail

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 15

Progress in Inventory Turns and Operating Margin

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 16

Impact of A Recession

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 17

• Nine out of ten industries are stuck: unable to power improvements in inventory turns and profitability.

• Manufacturers have outperformed retailers on productivity.

• The more steps back in the supply chain that a company is, the more important the principles of supply chain management are.

Where Are We?

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 18

Understanding Supply Chain Excellence

The Fundamentals

Progress by Industry

Comparison of Companies within a Peer Group

Recommendations

Wrap-up

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 19

0 250 500 750 1,000 1,2500

3

6

9

12

15

2002 2012

The Dow Chemical Company

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Visualizing the Patterns

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012 from One Source

Best Scenario

DOW999, 6.7

Trace the line from 2002 point to 2012 point to follow the performance over time.

The diamond shows the company’s average over the period. Ex: The Dow Chemical Company (DOW) has an average of 999 K$ for revenue per employee and 6.7 for inventory turns.

Ideally, companies are increasing inventory turns and revenue per employee, moving towards the upper right corner of the graph over time.

Here, we plot inventory turns (y-axis) vs. revenue per employee (x-axis).

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 20

Understanding the Patterns

Consumer Packaged Goods

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 22

Corporate Summary

Company

Stock

Exchange:

Ticker

Symbol

2012

Revenue

(billions

USD)

2012 Global

Employees

(thousands)

Country

Where

Based

Colgate-Palmolive

CompanyNYSE: CL 17.1 37.7 USA

(New York)

Kimberly-Clark

CorporationNYSE: KMB 21.1 58.0 USA

(Texas)

The Procter & Gamble

CompanyNYSE: PG 83.7 126.0 USA

(Ohio)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 23

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

4 5 6 70

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2000

2012

2000

2012

2000

2012

Colgate-Palmolive Company Kimberly-Clark CorporationThe Procter & Gamble Company

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

CL5.7, 43

KMB5.9, 67

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

PG5.6, 39

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 24

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.254

5

6

7

2000

2012

20002012 2000

2012

Colgate-Palmolive Company Kimberly-Clark CorporationThe Procter & Gamble Company

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

CL0.21, 5.7

KMB0.15, 5.7

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

PG0.18, 5.6

Best Scenario

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 25

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

200 300 400 500 600 7002

4

6

8

20122002

2002

20122002

2012

Colgate-Palmolive Company Kimberly-Clark CorporationThe Procter & Gamble Company

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

CL361, 5.5

KMB309, 5.9

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

PG536, 5.6

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Colgate-Palmolive Company 59 62 46

Kimberly-Clark Corporation 61 35 51

The Procter & Gamble Company 61 40 27

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Colgate-Palmolive Company 67 67 44

Kimberly-Clark Corporation 63 38 50

The Procter & Gamble Company 69 55 31

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Colgate-Palmolive Company 68 64 38

Kimberly-Clark Corporation 63 54 47

The Procter & Gamble Company 68 66 28

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Colgate-Palmolive Company 70 66 36

Kimberly-Clark Corporation 60 63 39

The Procter & Gamble Company 58 68 26

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 27

Consumer packaged goods companies have strength and resilience in their metrics performance, but have lost balance in the last three years. New techniques in supply chain management are needed to power the next level of improvement.

Summary

Retail

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 29

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 30

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

4 5 6 7 8 9 100

25

50

75

2001

2012

2000

2012

CVS Caremark Corporation Walgreen Company

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

CVS6.07, 58

WAG6.00, 39

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 31

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 32

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

CVS Caremark Corporation 83 33 16

Walgreen Company N/A N/A N/A

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

CVS Caremark Corporation 73 30 20

Walgreen Company 65 37 14

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

CVS Caremark Corporation 48 19 21

Walgreen Company 57 35 14

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

CVS Caremark Corporation 39 18 19

Walgreen Company 50 31 11

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 34

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 35

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

5 6 7 8 9 100

20

40

60

2000

2012

2000

2012

Target Corporation Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

TGT6.2, 39.6

WMT7.8, 13.5

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 36

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 37

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2003-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 38

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Target Corporation 62 57 32

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 52 36 3

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Target Corporation 58 63 39

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 49 38 2

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Target Corporation 57 51 41

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 42 37 4

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Target Corporation 60 47 31

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 44 40 5

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 39

Corporate Summary

Company

Stock

Exchange:

Ticker

Symbol

2012

Revenue

(billions

USD)

2012 Global

Employees

(thousands)

Country

Where

Based

Safeway Inc. NYSE: SWY 41.1 178.0 USA (Idaho)

The Kroger Co. NYSE: KR 82.2 338.0 USA(Ohio)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 40

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 150

5

10

15

20

25

2000

2012

2000

2012

Safeway Inc. The Kroger Co.

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

SWY10.5, 10.3

KR10.6, 11.9

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 41

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

-0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.17

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

2000

2012

2000

2012

Safeway Inc. The Kroger Co.

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

SWY0.04, 10.5

KR0.03, 10.6

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 42

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

150 200 250 3007

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

2012

2003

2012

2002

Safeway Inc. The Kroger Co.

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

SWY211, 10.7

KR218, 11.1

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 43

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Safeway Inc. N/A N/A N/A

The Kroger Co. 42 31 5

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Safeway Inc. 37 28 4

The Kroger Co. 36 30 4

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Safeway Inc. N/A N/A N/A

The Kroger Co. 31 25 4

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Safeway Inc. 29 35 7

The Kroger Co. 26 22 4

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 44

• Retailers have not been able to power the levels of productivity (revenue/employee) of consumer packaged goods, and mass merchants are doing better on performance improvements than grocery retailers.

• Wal-Mart is the leader in driving The Effective Frontier.

Retail Comments

Chemical

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 46

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 47

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns(2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 48

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin(2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 49

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 50

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

BASF SE 82 50 72

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 95 51 44

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

BASF SE 66 38 61

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 86 49 53

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

BASF SE 64 30 54

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 100 66 49

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

BASF SE 64 30 50

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. 106 69 42

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 51

• BASF has outperformed DuPont.• Chemical companies have less resilience

than CPG.

Chemical Comments

Food and Beverage

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 53

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 54

Cash-To-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns(2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

4 5 6 7 8 9

-30

-10

10

30

50

70

2000

2012

2000

2012

PepsiCo Inc. The Coca-Cola Company

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-To

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

PEP8.3, 30

KO5.4, 48

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-To-Cash Cycle)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 55

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin(2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

0.10 0.20 0.30 0.404

5

6

7

8

9

2000 2012

2000

2012

PepsiCo Inc. The Coca-Cola Company

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

PEP0.17, 8.3

KO0.27, 5.4

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 56

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

0 100 200 300 400 5004

5

6

7

8

9

10

2002

2012

20022012

PepsiCo Inc. The Coca-Cola Company

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

PEP207, 8.2

KO351, 5.4

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 57

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

PepsiCo Inc. 43 46 36

The Coca-Cola Company 63 N/A 38

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

PepsiCo Inc. 45 49 37

The Coca-Cola Company 70 N/A 39

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

PepsiCo Inc. 46 51 33

The Coca-Cola Company 71 46 41

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

PepsiCo Inc. 42 52 34

The Coca-Cola Company 63 35 36

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 58

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 59

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

4 5 6 7 8 90

10

20

30

40

50

2000

2012

2000

2012

General Mills, Inc. Kellogg Company

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

GIS6.2, 37.5

K7.4, 26.5

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 60

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.254

5

6

7

8

9

2000

2012

2000

2012

General Mills, Inc. Kellogg Company

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

GIS0.18, 6.2

K0.16, 7.4

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 61

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

300 350 400 450 5004

5

6

7

8

9

2002

2012

2003

2012

General Mills, Inc. Kellogg Company

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

GIS424, 6.6

K398, 7.4

Average (Revenue per Employee, Operating Margin)

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

General Mills, Inc. 71 85 40

Kellogg Company 49 48 32

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

General Mills, Inc. 54 47 31

Kellogg Company 49 56 28

General Mills, Inc.Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

General Mills, Inc. 57 36 27

Kellogg Company 50 56 31

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

General Mills, Inc. 51 39 29

Kellogg Company 57 58 37

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 63

• General Mills has outperformed Kellogg. PepsiCo has outperformed Coke.

• With rising commodity volatility, the focus on balanced portfolio metrics is critical.

Food and Beverage

Pharmaceuticals

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 65

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 66

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

0 1 2 3 4 5

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2001

2012

2000

2012

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Merck & Co., Inc.

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

MRK2.4, 175

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

BMY3.2, 57

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 67

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

82000

2012 2000

2012

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Merck & Co., Inc.

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

BMY0.22, 3.2 MRK

0.31, 2.8

Best Scenario

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 68

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

200 300 400 500 600 700 8000

1

2

3

4

5

2002

2012

2002

2012

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Merck & Co., Inc.

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

BMY526, 3.3

MRK412, 2.5

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 109 110 72

Merck & Co., Inc. 222 N/A 74

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 136 105 69

Merck & Co., Inc. 119 33 53

General Mills, Inc.Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 99 133 45

Merck & Co., Inc. 179 55 68

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 131 174 35

Merck & Co., Inc. 145 39 62

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 70

Healthcare Value Chain Financial Metrics

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 71

• Pharmaceutical companies lack supply chain muscle.

• The industry lacks balance and resiliency.

Pharmaceutical Companies

Automotive Suppliers

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 73

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 74

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns(2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

25

50

75

100

2000

2012

2000

2012

Danaher Corporation Johnson Controls, Inc.

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

DHR5.4, 73.1

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

JCI20.1, 19.5

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 75

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin(2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

-0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.200

5

10

15

20

25

30

2000

2012

2000 2012

Danaher Corporation Johnson Controls, Inc.

Operating Margin

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

DHR0.15, 5.4

JCI0.04, 20.1

Average (Operating Margin, Inventory Turns)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 76

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

150 200 250 3000

5

10

15

20

25

30

2002

2012

2002 2012

Danaher Corporation Johnson Controls, Inc.

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

DHR224, 5.4

JCI234, 18.9

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Best Scenario

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Danaher Corporation 65 45 61

Johnson Controls, Inc. 15 60 55

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Danaher Corporation 68 63 65

Johnson Controls, Inc. 19 60 64

Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Danaher Corporation 70 66 63

Johnson Controls, Inc. 23 64 65

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Danaher Corporation 75 64 65

Johnson Controls, Inc. 23 62 64

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 78

• The automotive supplier has more resiliency than pharmaceutical or chemical companies, but is going backwards, not forwards in driving improvement in results.

Automotive Industry

Consumer Electronics

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 80

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 81

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns(2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 82

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin(2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 83

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 84

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

LG Electronics 62 61 49

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 48 47 38

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

LG Electronics 62 41 37

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 46 30 38

General Mills, Inc.Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

LG Electronics 47 44 45

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 48 30 44

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

LG Electronics 47 52 50

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 59 29 46

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 85

• Samsung has outperformed LG.• Demand and price volatility has impacted

strength, balance and resiliency of performance.

Consumer Electronics

Packaging

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 87

Corporate Summary

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 88

Cash-to-Cash Cycle vs. Inventory Turns (2000-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

3 5 7 9 110

20

40

60

80

100

2000

2012

2000

2012

Owens-Illinois Inc. Sonoco Products Company

Inventory Turns

Ca

sh

-to

-Ca

sh

Cy

cle

Best Scenario

OI5.2, 67.9

SON9.2, 42.6

Average (Inventory Turns, Cash-to-Cash Cycle)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 89

Inventory Turns vs. Operating Margin (2000-2012)

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 90

Inventory Turns vs. Revenue per Employee (2002-2012)

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2002-2012

100 150 200 250 300 3503

5

7

9

11

2002

2012

2002

2012

Owens-Illinois Inc. Sonoco Products Company

Revenue per Employee (K$)

Inv

en

tory

Tu

rns

Best Scenario

OI258, 5.3

SON210, 9.5

Average (Revenue per Employee, Inventory Turns)

Cash-to-Cash Cycle Components

Company (2000-2003) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Owens-Illinois Inc. 79 45 49

Sonoco Products Company 44 40 43

Company (2004-2007) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Owens-Illinois Inc. 70 60 55

Sonoco Products Company 40 41 44

General Mills, Inc.Company (2008-2011) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Owens-Illinois Inc. 63 58 55

Sonoco Products Company 37 44 43

Company (2012) Days of Inventory Days of Payables Days of Receivables

Owens-Illinois Inc. 74 67 50

Sonoco Products Company 35 40 47

Source: Supply Chain Insights LLC, Corporate Annual Reports 2000-2012

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 92

• Sonoco Products has outperformed Owens Illinois in strength, resiliency and balance.

• The more steps back that a company is in the supply chain, the greater the importance of supply chain principles.

Packaging

Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2013, p. 93

• Nine out of ten industries are stuck in their ability to power The Effective Frontier. The potential and pattern of each industry is different.

• It is a trade-off of strength, balance and resiliency.• The larger the company, and the more steps back in the

supply chain, the more important the principles of supply chain management.

• For leaders, progress is made in small increments based on strategy.

Summary

top related