welcome to the 6th annual leadership academy administrator roles for increased rigor in instruction...
Post on 29-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Welcometo the
6th Annual Leadership Academy
Administrator Roles for
Increased Rigor in Instruction
We hope you enjoy the day!
What is the message?
• If your plan is for a year, plant rice. If your plan is for a decade, plant trees. If our plan is for a lifetime, educate children.
- Confucius
Agenda
Moral Imperative for Standards
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Reading Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Math Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Science Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Social Studies Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Math Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Reading Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Science Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Social Studies Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Writing Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2010 MEAP READINGLevel vs. % Correct 2010 (2009)
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct (2009)
Word Study Narrative TextInformational
TextComprehension
1 4109 88 86 83 86
2 4253 65 64 56 64
3 773 39 37 32 37
4 273 27 23 21 24
2010 MEAP MATH:Levels vs. % Correct 2010 (2009)
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct (2009)
FP 1 FP 2 FP 3 FP 4 FP 5 FP 6 FP 7
1 4351 73 72 66 64 66 66 65
2 3934 46 48 42 40 42 43 43
3 1000 27 31 30 26 26 22 29
4 114 15 21 21 19 18 8 18
2010 MEAP Science: Levels vs. % Correct
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct
Processes Physical Science Life Science Earth Science
1 1373 82 73 78 76
2 1418 61 50 57 53
3 360 37 33 39 34
4 88 24 20 26 24
2010 MEAP Social Studies: Levels vs. % Correct
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct
Historical Geographic Civics Economic
1 1429 71 78 80 74
2 1349 51 56 61 54
3 426 34 38 35 30
4 96 22 24 23 20
“..stop lying to parents about how well their children are prepared for the challenges of
living and working in the 21st century.”
Becoming a Leader in Education: An Agenda for Michigan
Impact of New Cut Scores (proposed)
Grade
Reading Math
% Proficient Old
% Proficient New
% Proficient Old
% Proficient New
3 92% 51% 98% 33%
4 88% 49% 92% 33%
5 89% 55% 81% 39%
6 90% 52% 86% 30%
7 86% 49% 88% 34%
8 88% 47% 85% 44%
11 72% 44% 57% 36%
Boehm Kindergarten Readiness
Year % of students “ready”(at level 1 or 2)
2010 52
2011 57
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 3rd 4th 5th20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AIMSweb Spring: % of Students Above Target
2010
2011
% o
f st
uden
ts
R-CBM MAZEPSF
2009 2010 20110%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
College Readiness Indicators% of students meeting all EPAS CRBs
Explore (8th)
Plan (10th)
ACT (11th)
Linear (ACT (11th))
ACT Performance (11th grade MME)Graduation Cohort ACT Composite % meeting all 4 CRB
2008 19.36 13.31
2009 19.43 16.56
2010 19.69 16.75
2011 20.10 18.73
2012 20.32 20.41
2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Work-Keys% of students scoring level 5 (or above)
on Applied Math & Reading
Test Year
% o
f st
ud
ents
Next Generation Assessments:21st Century Skills (right now!)
• Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
• Collaboration Across Networks• Agility and Adaptability• Initiative/Entrepreneurship• Oral and Written
communication• Accessing and Analyzing
information• Curiosity and Imagination
College and Work Readiness Assessment (CWRA)
• Critical thinking• Problem Solving• Written Expression• Writing Mechanics• 90 minute
constructed response• Fixed
references/resources
CWRA – Regional Results
CWRA-Writing
CWRA: Analysis and Problem Solving
Where do we go from here?• How have we improved?
– More deliberate assessment calendar;
– More commonality;– Increased participation;– More PD related to assessment:– Improved data management;– Improved access to information;
• What needs to be developed?– Time to analyze;– An instructional response!
“Will the circle be unbroken?”
Curriculum
Assessment
Instruction
Will it impact our lesson plans?
Who needs the most help?
– Cindy: 97– Bobby: 85– Jan: 56– Peter: 82– Marcia: 100– Greg: 91
Do we know what our assessments expect of students?
• “What Do Our Assessments Measure?”
• Samples
Carpe Diem the CCSS!
• Interested Students
• Energized Teachers
• Exceptional Future
• If…
4 Requirements of Effective Instructional Leadership
Ensure that all personal are engaged in CCSS implementation through rigorous lesson design;
Provide high quality professional development and support;
Monitor progress toward implementation through walkthroughs, meetings, feedback, etc;
Publicly communicate your status in implementing the CCSS to your stakeholders monthly.
top related