unconventional wisdom and the effects of dams on downstream coarse sediment supply

Post on 30-May-2015

643 Views

Category:

Technology

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

A presentation I gave at River Restoration Northwest\'s Annual Symposium in February 2009.their website: http://rrnw.org/

TRANSCRIPT

Unconventional Wisdom and the Effects of Dams on Downstream Coarse Sediment Supply

3 February 2009

Sultan River, WA

Byron Amerson, Jay Stallman,

John Wooster, and Derek Booth

OBJECTIVE

Consider the landscape context of a dam

before drawing conclusions about its

downstream effects.

CONCEPTS

THE FLUVIAL SYSTEM

The watershed and river as a mechanism

that routes water and sediment.

Schumm, 1977

CONCEPTS

Dams affect downstream flux of sediment

and water.

Bed Coarsening

Channel Degradation

Loss of Spawning Gravel

South Fork Feather River

CONCEPTS

What About other outcomes?

Need to Consider…

Sediment Supply

Transport Frequency

EXCESS

DEFICIT

HIGHLOW

Ch

an

ge i

n R

ela

tive

Sed

imen

t S

up

ply

Bed Coarsening

Channel Degradation

Habitat Loss

Subtle Effects

Channel Aggradation

Island and Bar Formation

Vegetation Encroachment

Change in Relative Transport

FrequencyBased on Grant, Schmidt, and Lewis 2003

EXCESS

DEFICIT

HIGHLOW

CONVENTIONAL

WISDOM

Ch

an

ge i

n R

ela

tive

Sed

imen

t S

up

ply

Change in Relative Transport

FrequencyBased on Grant, Schmidt, and Lewis 2003

Subtle Effects

Channel Aggradation

Island and Bar Formation

Vegetation Encroachment

EXCESS

DEFICIT

HIGHLOW

CONVENTIONAL

WISDOM

Ch

an

ge i

n R

ela

tive

Sed

imen

t S

up

ply

Change in Relative Transport

FrequencyBased on Grant, Schmidt, and Lewis 2003

UNCONVENTIONAL

WISDOM

CONCEPTS

Geology and Geologic History

Topography

Climate and Hydrology

Land Use

Dam Position

Dam Operation

Case Studies

Sultan River, WA

McKenzie River, OR

Deschutes River, OR

What are the primary sources of sediment to

the river downstream of the dam?

SULTAN RIVER

The Jackson hydroelectric project operated by Snohomish PUD

Washington

Annual sediment mass balance remains similar before and afte damming.

WHAT

KEY FINDINGS

Culmback Dam

Sultan River, WA

Spada Lake

Culmback

Dam

Data for this LiDAR DEM was provided by the Snohomish PUD

LITHOTOPO UNITS SEDIMENT INPUTS

• Dominated by debris

flows

• High Sediment Yield

V-SHAPED VALLEY

LITHOTOPO UNITS SEDIMENT INPUTS

V-SHAPED VALLEY

EARTHFLOWS

GULLIES

ROCK FALLS

TERRACED VALLEY

• Dominated earth

flows

• Moderate Sediment

Yield

• Dominated by debris

flows

• High Sediment Yield

LITHOTOPO UNITS SEDIMENT INPUTS

• Dominated by debris

flows

• High Sediment Yield

EARTHFLOWS

GULLIES

ROCK FALLS

• Dominated earth

flows

• Moderate Sediment

Yield

TRIBUTARIES

ALLUVIAL VALLEY

BANK FAILURE

V-SHAPED VALLEY

TERRACED VALLEY

•Sediment input from

upstream

•Low Sediment Yield

LITHOTOPO UNITS SEDIMENT INPUTS

• Dominated by debris

flows

• High Sediment Yield

EARTHFLOWS

GULLIES

ROCK FALLS

• Dominated earth

flows

• Moderate Sediment

Yield

TRIBUTARIES•Sediment input from

upstream

•Low Sediment YieldBANK FAILURE

ALLUVIAL VALLEY

V-SHAPED VALLEY

TERRACED VALLEY

Sultan River at present-day Spada Lake, 1949.

This reach was a depositional pool-riffle channel.

Sultan River at present-day Spada Lake, 1949.

Therefore, the river upstream of

Culmback Dam was a sediment sink, and

contributed relatively little to the

downstream sediment budget.

EXCESS

DEFICIT

HIGHLOW

Ch

an

ge i

n R

ela

tive

Sed

imen

t S

up

ply

Change in Relative Transport

FrequencyBased on Grant, Schmidt, and Lewis 2003

1965 Pre-dam

Sultan River, WA

Active channel

350 feet wide

Active channel

175 feet wide

1965 1983 2003

EXCESS

DEFICIT

HIGHLOW

Ch

an

ge i

n R

ela

tive

Sed

imen

t S

up

ply

Change in Relative Transport

FrequencyBased on Grant, Schmidt, and Lewis 2003

1965 2007

Sultan River, WA

Active channel

350 feet wide

Active channel

175 feet wide

1965 1983 2003

McKENZIE RIVER

A Carmen-Smith hydroelectric project operated by Eugene Water and Electric Board

Oregon

Sediment mass balance Downstream of Trailbridge Dam is similar to reference conditions.

WHAT

KEY FINDINGS

Trailbridge

Dam

McKenzie River, OR

High Cascades Terrane

• Young volcanics

• Low drainage density

• Hydrologically disconnected

• Low Sediment Yield

Western Cascades Terrane

• Older volcanics

• High drainage density

• Hydrologically connected

• High Sediment Yield

McKenzie River, OR

Carmen Diversion

Dam

Smith Dam

Trailbridge

Dam

McKenzie River, OR

Upper McKenzie

Basin

Smith River

Basin

Deer Creek

Basin

Trailbridge

Dam

McKenzie River, OR

Deer Creek

Trailbridge

Dam

DESCHUTES RIVER

The Pelton-Round Butte hydroelectric project operated jointly by Portland General Electric and the Confederated Warm Springs Tribes

Oregon

Subtle response - bed texture and spawning gravel area are similar to pre-dam conditions.

WHAT

KEY FINDINGS

Pelton Reregulating Dam

Deschutes River, OR

Annual Sediment

Production

Figure From O’Conner et al. 2003

Deschutes River, OR

Annual Sediment

Production

Figure From O’Conner et al. 2003

Pelton Round

Butte Project

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Oct

No

v

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May

Ju

n

Ju

l

Au

g

Sep

1924-1956

1964-2007

Mean

Mo

nth

ly D

isch

arg

e (

CF

S)

Low Sediment Yield and a Subdued

Hydrograph

1924 -1956

1964 - 2007

Recap

Sultan: Sediment mass balance remains

similar and Channel Adjustment.

McKenzie: Downstream sediment mass

balance is similar to reference conditions.

Deschutes: Subtle response, though

reduced sediment supply.

CONCLUSION

Context Matters

Because as we have seen, landscape

attributes, land use, dam position, and

operation all influence downstream

physical process outcomes.

Acknowledgements

Snohomish PUD

Eugene Water and Electric Board

Portland General Electric and the

Confederated Warm Springs Tribes

THANK YOU

Our modeling tells us that the modern and

historical mass balance are the same

Modern Sediment

Transport Capacity

(KT/yr)

Historical Sediment

Transport Capacity

(KT/yr)

Average Annual

Sediment Input

(KT/yr)

0.7 - 12 0.2 - 9 ~11

Estimated Modern Mass

Balance (KT/yr)

Estimated Historical

Mass Balance (KT/yr)

-1 to 10 2 to 10

top related