the natural history and surgical treatment of primary melanoma 2011 phoenix surgical symposium john...

The Natural History and Surgical Treatment of Primary

Melanoma

2011 Phoenix Surgical Symposium

John M. Kane III, MD

Chief-Melanoma/Sarcoma

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Melanoma Facts

• estimated 68,130 cases in 2010–8700 deaths

• 6th most common adult cancer–second only to leukemia for loss of life-

years–one death per hour in U.S.

• lifetime risk approaching 1 in 55

ABCDE’s of a Suspicious Lesion

• A asymmetry

• B border irregularity

• C color differences

• D diameter > 6 mm

• E evolution

Biopsy of a Suspicious Lesion

• thickness of tumor most important– full thickness punch biopsy– excisional biopsy– limitations of shave biopsy

• consider need for more surgery– small rim of normal skin (1-2mm)– arms/legs-longitudinal– chest/abdomen/back-transverse– small biopsy of large lesion

Melanoma Staging: Primary Tumor

• Breslow thickness (mm)– ≤ 1, 1.01-2, 2.01-4, >4

• ulceration• mitotic index

– # mitoses/mm2

– < vs. ≥ 1• Clark level no longer

relevant

Melanoma Staging: Lymph Nodes

• micro versus macrometastases• number of positive nodes• concept of in transit disease

AJCC melanoma staging 2010

2010 AJCC Melanoma Staging

AJCC TNM Staging

Balch et al. J Clin Oncol 2001

Additional Prognostic Information

Balch et al. J Clin Oncol 2001

Additional Prognostic Information

Balch et al. J Clin Oncol 2001

AJCC Melanoma Nomogram

• www.melanomaprognosis.org/

Preoperative Melanoma Workup

• biopsy pathology• history and physical exam• focused studies from H&P

• no proven benefit to routine CXR, CT, PET, or laboratory studies– CXR: <0.3% true +; 3-15% false +– CT or PET: <1.3% true +; 16-37% false +

Surgical Treatment

• historical “wide local excision” with 5 cm margins– single patient pathology description – circular defect with skin graft

• current margin recommendations– melanoma in situ: 5mm– < 2 mm: 1 cm– ≥ 2mm: 2 cm

• full thickness skin/SQ to fascia for melanoma

• ignore lines of Langer• < 20% will require skin graft• local recurrence rate 1-2%

Melanoma Lymph Node Metastases and Prognosis

# lymph nodes

1 microscopic

1 visible

2-3 microscopic

2-3 visible

> 4

5 year survival

50-70%

30-60%

50-65%

25-50%

20-30%

Lymphatic Basins at Risk

• lymphoscintigraphy– 59% of lymphatic drainage not predicted by

Sappey’s lines– 89% of midline lesions drained bilaterally– evidence of orderly lymphatic drainage

Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy

• outpatient procedure for finding occult tumor in the regional nodes

• success rate > 95%• minimal complications

– <2% risk lymphedema• completion lymphadenectomy if sentinel

node is positive

SLN Biopsy

• 10-40% are positive– risk increases with primary tumor thickness

• NOT for every melanoma patient– ≥ 10% risk for nodal metastases– no major medical co-morbidities– reasonable life expectancy– less predictive in older patients

“As age increases, so does Breslow thickness, the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients—all poor prognostic factors. Incongruously, however, the frequency of SLN metastasis declines with increasing age.”

Chao C, Martin RCG II, Ross MI, et al. Correlation between prognostic factors and increasing age in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:259–64.

Lessons from Lymph Node Mapping

Lessons from Lymph Node Mapping

Lessons from Lymph Node Mapping

The $1,000,000 Question

• Does early detection and removal of clinically occult nodal metastatic melanoma using SLN biopsy/completion node dissection (CLND) improve survival?

Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT)

• 1,347 patients with melanoma 1.2-3.5 mm• 3:2 randomized WE/SLN Bx vs. WE/OBS• median follow-up 59 months• positive nodes: 16% vs. 15.6%• 5 yr melanoma specific survival

– 87.1% vs. 86.6% (n.s.) • 90.2% if negative SLN Bx• 72.3% if positive SLN Bx

• Mean # positive nodes: 1.4 vs. 3.3

Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT)

Benefits of SLN Biopsy

• accurate nodal staging in all patients• high chance for obtaining regional control

of positive nodal basin• variable most predictive for survival• guide adjuvant therapy decisions• identifies a homogeneous patient

population for clinical trials• IS A MARKER FOR BUT NOT THE

CAUSE OF DISTANT METASTASES!!!

Melanoma Surveillance

• 50% recurrences in first 2 years– 90% by 5 years– 2% recur 15+ years

• history and physical– Q3-6 mos X 2 yrs, Q6 mos X 3 yrs, Q yr X 5 yrs

• no proven benefit to routine surveillance imaging or bloodwork– occasional pelvic CT to assess iliac LNs after only

superficial groin LND for a positive SLN biopsy• dermatologic skin surveillance

– 5% lifetime risk for second primary melanoma

Special Situations

• thick primary • children• elderly• pregnancy• unknown primary• atypical Spitz/unknown biologic potential• congenital nevus

Thick Primary and Sentinel Node Biopsy

Gershenwald et al., Ann Surg Onc, 2000

• 126 patients SLN biopsy• 4-22 mm thick melanoma• 39% positive SLN• predictors of survival• SLN status• ulceration

Melanoma in Children

• 2% melanomas < age 20• risks: congenital nevus, DNS, xeroderma• 80% early stage• outcome similar to adults

– +/- shorter time to recurrence• treatment same as adults

• Spitz nevus

Elderly Melanoma Patient

• negative survival results of MSLT-I• medical comorbidities

– anticipated survival– risks of anesthesia– ? candidate for adjuvant therapy

• “As age increases, so does Breslow thickness, the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients—all poor prognostic factors. Incongruously, however, the frequency of SLN metastasis declines with increasing age.”

• wide excision +/- SLN biopsy (selective)

Chao C, Martin RCG II, Ross MI, et al. Correlation between prognostic factors and increasing age in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:259–64.

Melanoma, Pregnancy, and Estrogen

• melanoma biology not worse during pregnancy• no increased risk with subsequent pregnancy

– timing based upon recurrence risk

• no increased risk with OCP’s or HRT

• no prospective randomized trials, but

good case/control studies

Schwartz et al., Cancer, 2003

Surgical Treatment of Melanoma During Pregnancy

• SLN biopsy– information extremely valuable– does not improve survival– anesthetic/dye risks– accuracy does not decrease after wide

excision

Perform wide excision and delay sentinel node biopsy until after delivery

Unknown Primary

• concept of regression– hypopigmentation/Wood’s light exam

• 2.6% of 2485 patients• 43% presented with nodal disease

– 5 yr OS 38.7%

• no survival difference stage for stage vs. historical controls

Katz et al., Melanoma Research, 2005

Atypical Spitz Tumor

• atypical features not sufficient to call melanoma

• treat as if melanoma• WLE• consider SLN biopsy

– up to 50% positive• inverse with age• not necessarily a poor

prognosis

Dahlstrom et al., Pathology, 2004

Large Congenital Nevus

• 1:1,000-20,000 births• melanoma risk 2-20%

– 1/3 childhood melanoma– 1/2 by age 10

• consider prophylactic excision– full thickness to fascia

Melanoma Summary

• evaluation of suspicious lesion– full thickness biopsy– smallest biopsy possible– think about need for additional surgery

• wide excision is primary therapy• importance of regional lymph node status

– sentinel lymph node biopsy– removal of all lymph nodes for clinical disease or

positive sentinel node

• need for long-term follow-up