the case for yet another digital preservation evaluation tool
Post on 27-Jun-2015
356 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
THE CASE FOR YET
ANOTHER DIGITAL
PRESERVATION
EVALUATION TOOL
Robert Gillesse (DEN)
Henk Vanstappen (PACKED)
IS&T Archiving 2014
DEN & PACKED
Dutch and Flemish centers of expertise
supporting cultural heritage institutions in
creating, preserving and publicizing digital
heritage
Digital preservation important part of message
Score mo joint effort
Foto: THE Holy Hand Grenade! CC BY-SA 2.0
Foto: Wief70 CC BY-NC 2.0
Foto: portfolium CC BY-NC 2.0
DIGITAL PRESERVATION IS…
Organizational structure
People and resources
Storage
Standards
File identification and validation
Checksums
Archival file formats
Migration, normalization, emulation
Preservation metadata
Structural metadata
Technology watch
….
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
DRAMBORA Digital Repository Audit Method
Based on Risk Assessment
By DCC and DPE
221 pages (draft)
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
ED3 Eisen Duurzaam Digitaal Depot
V.2 publicated 2012
28 p.
Bases on TRAC and TDR
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
NESTOR CHECKLIST Kriterienkatalog vertrauenswurdige
digitale Langzeitarchive
Nestor-Arbeitsgruppe Vertrauens-
wurdige Archive – Zertifizierung
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
DATASEAL OF APPROVAL
Trustworthy preservation of research
data
Five principles translated into 17
guidelines
Broad community
Self-assessment followed by peer
review
Created by Data Archiving and
Networked Services (DANS) now
managed by an international board
Based on TRAC, DRAMBORA, etc
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
CHARLES M. DOLLAR Digital Preservation Readiness Capability Maturity Model
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
TRUSTED DIGITAL
REPOSITORY (TDR)
CHECKLIST
Largely based on TRAC
checklist
ISO 16363:2012
77 pages
Based on the OAIS
reference model
Recommendation for Space Data System Practices
MAGENTA BOOK
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF
TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
CCSDS 652.0-M-1
September 2011
STANDARDS & CHECKLISTS
OAIS BLUE BOOK Developed by NASA
ISO 14721:2003
148 pages
Content Information: The set of information that is the
original target of preservation. It is an Information
Object comprised of its Content Data Object and its
Representation Information. An example of Content
Information could be a single table of numbers
representing, and understandable as, temperatures,
but excluding the documentation that would explain its
history and origin, how it relates to other observations,
etc.
RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACE
DATA SYSTEM STANDARDS
Reference Model for an
Open Archival Information
System (OAIS)
CCSDS 650.0-B-1
BLUE BOOK
January 2002
MOTIVATION AND AIM
Existing DP evaluation tools are complex and
need expertise to use
Unwanted effect of this complexity:
organizations might be overwhelmed and
ignore the urgency and risks concerning their
digital collections
AIM
Create a self-evaluation tool that smaller or
less technically orientated institutions can use
Easy to use and to manage -> web tool
Risk analysis
Problem solving
Dutch & English version
RELATION TO OTHER EVALUATION
TOOLS
Based on different DP evaluation tools
TDR
DRAMBORA
NESTOR
Dataseal of approval
ED3
Inspired by the Digital Preservation Capability
Maturity Model
COMPLEMENTARY
Complementary to the existing audit tools
First step towards TDR audit
CHALLENGES
Translate complicated interlinked OAIS
terminology into non-simplistic, jargon free
criteria
Keep amount of criteria as low as possible
without being too concise
Building a user- and management-friendly
web tool
USER RESULTS
Results are private
Model can be used anonymously
Registered users:
Can return to earlier made reports
Can fill in the model in different sessions
62 CRITERIA
Context
Risks
Examples
Solutions
THREE RISK LEVELS
No flasher
No lights
No brakes
A MATURITY MODEL FOR REPOSITORIES
THREE LEVELS
A MATURITY MODEL FOR REPOSITORIES
THREE LEVELS
A MATURITY MODEL FOR REPOSITORIES
THREE LEVELS
SEVEN DOMAINS
Policy
Strategy
Expertise & organization
Storage management
Ingest
Planning & control
Access
SCORES
For each domain maximum of 100 points
Three risk levels have different weights
The high risk criteria have to be fulfilled
before the criteria of lower risk will even
count
Idea: which things have to be done first
FINAL REPORT & ACTION PLAN
After filling in all criteria the user gets:
Final report (PDF)
Action plan: all failed criteria listed
RADAR CHART
DEMO
DEMO
DEMO
FUTURE PLANS & CHALLENGES
Improving texts
Better connection to TDR checklist
Version management
Privacy vs interesting statistical material
Possibility of adapting risk levels
User research
BROADER IMPLICATIONS
DP has broad implications for an cultural heritage
organization:
Policy, organization, budget, ICT household and
workflows, etc.
Risk of being overwhelmed and let other
priorities win over
Score model might help pointing out the biggest
problems and prioritize
Unspoken possible implications of using the model:
Outsourcing
Cooperation
CONCLUSIONS
Score model is used by a diverse group of
cultural heritage institutions
Mainly from Netherlands, Belgium and the US
Also used for educational purposes
Case has been proved for a easy accessible
and easy to use tool which gives a first
overview of what DP is all about
BROADER IMPLICATIONS
DP has broad implications for an cultural heritage organization:
Policy, organization, budget, ICT household and workflows,
etc.
Risk of being overwhelmed and let other priorities win over
Score model might help pointing out the biggest problems and
first steps taken
Unspoken possible implications of using the model:
Outsourcing
Cooperation
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Fragen,_Wegweiser.JPG
www.scoremodel.org
robert.gillesse@den.nl
henk.vanstappen@packed.be
top related