the art of contrac - association of corporate...

Post on 02-May-2018

217 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

TheArtofContrac.ngToolsandTipsforIden/fyingandAvoidingCommon

TrapsinCommercialContracts

April12,2017

Crowell&MoringLLP590MadisonAvenue,20thFloor

NewYork,NY10022-2544www.crowell.com

©2017Crowell&MoringLLP

• Howarevariouseffortsstandardsinterpreted?Efforts

• Whatismaterial?Materiality

• Whatclaimsarecovered?AretherelimitaPons?

IndemnificaPonandLimitaPonofLiability

OverviewofToday’sWorkshop

2

STANDARDSOFEFFORT

Phrase #ofContractsUsing

#ofContractsDefining

bestefforts 627 1

commerciallyreasonableefforts 425 1

reasonablebestefforts 345 0

reasonableefforts 307 0

good-faithefforts 58 0

commerciallyreasonablebestefforts 46 0

diligentefforts 23 0

good-faithbestefforts 8 0

everyeffort 5 0

commerciallyreasonableanddiligentefforts 3 1

WhatStandardsofEffortAreUsed

“Understanding ‘Best Efforts’ And Its Variants,” Kenneth A. Adams, The Practical Lawyer, 2004 4

OpeningThoughts

•  Languagemaydriveconductevenifitsenforceabilityisques.onable.

•  Nego.a.nghistorymaymaMer.•  Striveforconsistencyandclarity.

5

»  Heavilynego.ated–  ContractlawyersoYenusemorethanonestandardinanygivencontract.

–  AvoidsnakedobligaPonsandisespeciallyusefulwhenperformanceoftheobligaPonisnotenPrelywithintheperformingparty’scontrol.

»  Frequentlyli.gated…

»  …tounpredictableresults.

WhytheFocusonEffortsClauses?

6

» Obligatesperformingpartytousesomelevelofdiligencetoaccomplishacontractuallyassignedduty.

•  Example:Contractobligatesdistributortouse“bestefforts”topromoteandsellmanufacturer’sproducts.

WhatDoesBestEffortsMean?

7

»  Delaware:Promisormust“undertakeitscontractualobligaPonsdiligentlyandwithreasonableeffort.”

»  California:“Besteffortsdoesnotmeaneveryconceivableeffort.Itdoesnotrequirethepromisortoignoreitsowninterests,spenditselfintobankruptcy,orincursubstanPallossestoperformitscontractualobligaPons.”

SeeCal.PinesProp.OwnersAss’nv.Pedo5,206Cal.App.4th384,387(2012);Crum&CrumEnters.,Inc.v.NDCofCal.,L.P.,2010WL4668456,*5(D.Del.Nov.3,2010)

Interpre.ngBestEffortsClauses

8

“I can’t agree to use best efforts! That would

require me to bankrupt my company!”

DebunkingtheNewYorkMyth

9

Levelofeffortrequiredis“murky”:»  “duediligence”

–  VanValkenburgh,Nooger&Nevillev.HaydenPubl.Co.,30N.Y.2d34,45(N.Y.1972)

»  “allreasonablemethods”–  TownofRoxburyv.Rodrigues,716N.Y.S.2d814,815(N.Y.App.Div.2000)

»  “reasonableefforts”–  TimberlineDev.LLCv.Kronman,702N.Y.S.2d237,239(N.Y.App.Div.2000)

»  “genuineeffort”–  FosterWheelerBroomeCnty.,Inc.v.CountyofBroome,713N.Y.S.2d92,94(N.Y.App.Div.2000)

SeealsoAshokanWaterServs.,Inc.v.NewStart,LLC,807N.Y.S.2d550,553(N.Y.Civ.Ct.2006)(summarizingpriorinterpretaPonsof“bestefforts”standards)

So,WhatDoesNYCaseLawActuallySay?

10

» NocaseidenPfiedrequiringaperformingpartyto“spenditselfintobankruptcy.”

»  TheSecondCircuithasheldthatNewYorklawdoesnotrequireapartyperformingundera“bestefforts”standardto“spenditselfintobankruptcy.”

Bloorv.FalstaffBrewingCorp.,601F.2d609,614(2ndCir.1979)

Bankrup.ngtheCompany

11

»  “PracPPoners...tendtoviewalltheotherphrases,whileperhapsnotbeingtoodifferentfromeachother,asbeingdefinitelydifferentfrom“bestefforts.”

LouR.Kling&EileenT.Simon,NegoPatedAcquisiPonsofCompanies,SubsidiariesandDivisions,§13.06n.3.2(2003)

BestEffortsvsTheRest

12

Becauserecentcaselawsuggeststhatbesteffortsincorporatestheconceptofreasonableness,

unlessacontractdefiniPonprovidesotherwise,“reasonablebestefforts,”“reasonableefforts”and“commerciallyreasonableefforts”arelikelytobeinterpretedtomeanthesameas“best

efforts.”

Interpre.ngtheVariants

13

“Thestandardimposedbya‘reasonableefforts’clausesuchasthatcontainedinsecPon7.01oftheAgreementisindisputablylessstringent

thanthatimposedbythe‘bestefforts’clausescontainedelsewhereintheAgreement.”

InreChateaugayCorp.,198B.R.848,854(S.D.N.Y.1996),aff’d108F.3d1369(2dCir.1997)

Inconsistency

14

»  Fact-specificinquirywithunpredictableresults–otherthanexpensiveliPgaPon

»  CourtswilllooktopromisesorprojecPonsmadeinnegoPaPon,industrystandards,priorconduct,etc.

TheAXermath–Li.ga.ngDisputes

SeeSamicaEnters.,LLCv.MailBoxesEtc.,637F.Supp.2d712,717(C.D.Cal.2008):“whetheradefendantusedbesteffortsunderthecircumstancesisa

factualquesPonusuallyreservedforthejury.”

15

ü  AtleastoneNYcourtrefusedtoenforceanundefined“bestefforts”standard. SeeTimberlineDev.LLCv.Kronman,702N.Y.S.2d237,239(N.Y.App.Div.2000)

ü  Consideryouraudience:–  AformerD.A.,nowjudge,mayhavenoideawhat“commerciallyreasonablebestefforts”are.

ü  Describetheapplicablestandardofconduct:–  “levelofeffortcustomarilyemployedbyareasonableventurecapitalist”–  “levelofeffortusedtosellyourownproducts”–  setminimumthresholds

ü  ProvideillustraPveexamples.

DraXingConsidera.ons

16

WHATDOES“MATERIAL”REALLYMEAN?

17

“obtain all material consents” “Assigned Assets include

all material assets used in the business”

“terminated only in the event of material

breach”

“Vendor may use subcontractors only to perform non-material

obligations.” “in the event of a material delay”

Howis“material”reallyused?

18

“Isofsuchanaturethatknowledgeoftheitemwouldaffectaperson’sdecision-makingprocess”(Delaware;BlacksLawDicPonary)

“GoestotherootoftheagreementbetweentheparPes” (NewYork)

“Affectsaparty’sdecisionastowhetherornottoenterintothecontract”(California)

CommonDefini.ons

19

»  ManyjurisdicPonsusethe“deal-breaker”definiPon:

– QuesPon:Wouldtheinnocentpartyhaveagreedtoenterthecontractwithouttheinclusionofthedisputedclause?

MostCommonDefini.on

“Material”=sosubstan.alastodefeatthepurposeoftheen.retransac.on.

20

–  (a)theextenttowhichtheinjuredpartywillbedeprivedofthebenefitwhichhereasonablyexpected;

–  (b)theextenttowhichtheinjuredpartycanbeadequatelycompensatedforthepartofthatbenefitofwhichhewillbedeprived;

–  (c)theextenttowhichthepartyfailingtoperformortooffertoperformwillsufferforfeiture;

–  (d)thelikelihoodthatthepartyfailingtoperformortooffertoperformwillcurehisfailure,takingaccountofallthecircumstancesincludinganyreasonableassurances;

–  (e)theextenttowhichthebehaviorofthepartyfailingtoperformortooffertoperformcomportswithstandardsofgoodfaithandfairdealing.

NewYorkCourts–RestatementofContracts§241Factors

21

ü Usematerialityconsistentlythroughoutthecontract.

ü Evaluatethepurposeofusingmateriality.ü Usedollarthresholdsinsteadofmateriality.ü SpecificallyidenPfywhichprovisionsorobligaPonsarematerial.

ü Usetermsotherthanmaterialitywhereothertermsmightprovideamoreclearmeaning.

Prac.ceTips

22

RISKALLOCATION

23

Reps/WarranPes

Indemnity

LimitaPonofLiability

SPpulatedDamages

ElementsofRiskAlloca.on

24

LIMITATIONOFLIABILITY

25

»  LimitaPonofliabilityprovisionslimitaparty’sexposureintheeventofadispute.

»  ParPesmaylimit:

»  Totalamountofdamages

»  Typesofdamages(e.g.,consequenPalorpuniPvedamages)

»  Nonmonetaryrelief

Preven.ngExcessiveExposure

26

LimitaPonofLiability.

Eachparty’sliability,whetherincontract,tort,otherwise,arisingoutoforinconnecPonwiththisAgreement…shallnotexceedtheamountoftheLicenseFee.

INNOEVENTSHALLEITHERPARTYBELIABLEFORANYSPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,PUNITIVE,CONSEQUENTIAL(INCLUDINGLOSTPROFITS)ORTORTDAMAGESARISINGOUTOFORINCONNECTIONWITHTHISAGREEMENT...

Example

27

»  CourtsgenerallyenforceliabilitylimitaPonsinclaimsforbreachofcontractandnegligence.

–  MaynotbeenforcedforintenPonaltorts–  LimitaPonsfor“grossnegligence”subjecttochallengeCompareCityofSantaBarbarav.SuperiorCourt,41Cal.4th747,758(2007)andABRYPartnersV,L.P.v.F&WAcquisiPonLLC,891A.2d1032(Del.Ch.2006).

–  NYcourtsdefinegrossnegligencemorelikeintenPonalmisconduct.

»  ThelanguageofthelimitaPonis“strictlyconstrued.”

»  LiPgaPonoYenresultsoverthelanguageused.

Enforceability

28

» ThereareessenPallyfourtypesofdamages:– Direct– ConsequenPal/Special– Incidental– PuniPve

» Allfourtypescanbelimited.

PrimaryTypesofDamages

29

»  Directdamages“followfromthetypeofwrongcomplainedof.”

–  Black’sLawDicPonary446(9thed.2009).

»  Courtsgenerallyupholdcapsondirectdamagestotheamountpaidunderthecontract.

–  Markboroughv.SuperiorCourt,227Cal.App.3d705(1991)(limiPngrecoverytotheamountoftheconsulPngfeepaidtothedefendant).

»  Capsoflessthantheamountpaidunderthecontractmayalsobeupheld.

–  See,e.g.,Sch.Dist.oftheCityofNiagaraFallsv.CrossPointe,LLC,2011U.S.Dist.LEXIS143739(W.D.N.Y.2011)(limitaPonondamagestoannualservicefeepresumedvalid);Rob-Win,Inc.v.LydiaSec.Monitoring,Inc.,2007Del.Super.LEXIS421,*20-21(Del.Super.Ct.2007)(upholdingcapof$250forsecurityalarmmonitoring).

Limi.ngDirectDamages

30

»  LimitaPonondirectdamagesupheldforintenPonalbreachofcontract.–  Example:inaservicesagreement,thelimitaPonofliabilityis$100,000.The

costtoperformincreasesbymorethan$100,000.Thevendorstopsperforming.

–  Result:Customer’sdirectdamageslimitedto$100,000.

–  CauPon:Thecontractmayalsoincludeaspecificperformanceclause,whichcouldalsobeinvoked.

Inten.onalBreach

An“economicallymoPvateddecisioncannot,asamaweroflaw,risetothelevelofmaliceorintenPonalwrongdoingnecessarytoinvalidate”alimitaPonofliabilityprovision.SeeNet2GlobeInt’l,Inc.v.TimeWarnerTelecom,273F.Supp.2d436,451(S.D.N.Y.2003).

31

»  ConsequenPaldamagesare“[l]ossesthatdonotflowdirectlyandimmediatelyfromaninjuriousactbutthatresultindirectlyfromtheact.”

–  Black’sLawDicPonary446(9thed.2009).

»  CourtsgenerallyupholdlimitaPonsonconsequenPaldamages.

»  ConsiderwhethertodefinedirectorconsequenPaldamages.

Consequen.alDamages

32

»  ThelinebetweenwhatisadirectdamageandwhatisaconsequenPaldamageisblurry,atbest.

»  Onewaytoavoidambiguityistoclearlydefinedirectdamages:

–  Fortheavoidanceofdoubt,thefollowingshallbeconsidereddirectdamagesandVendorshallnotassertthattheyareindirect,incidental,consequenPalorspecialdamagestotheextenttheyresultfromVendor’sfailuretoperforminaccordancewiththisAgreement:(a)commerciallyreasonablecostsandexpensesofrestoringorreloadinganyClientDatathatislost,stolenordamagedduetoVendor’sfailuretosafeguardtheClientDataand(b)reasonableexpensesincurredbyClient,includingoverheadallocaPonsforemployees,wagesandsalariesofemployees,travelexpenses,overPmeexpensesandsimilarcharges,duetoafailureofVendortoprovidealloraporPonoftheServices.

AvoidingAmbiguity

33

Are“lostprofits”consequenPalordirectdamages?

KeyQues.on

34

»  LostprofitsmaybecategorizedaseitherconsequenPaldamagesordirectdamages,orboth.

»  AcontractthatdoesnotcapdirectdamagesbutexcludesconsequenPaldamagesinvitesliPgaPonovertheavailabilityoflostprofitdamages.

–  SeeCoremetrics,Inc.v.AtomicPark.com,LLC,2005U.S.Dist.LEXIS40484,*8(N.D.Cal.2005)(lostprofitsrecoverabledespiteexclusionofconsequenPaldamages).

LostProfits

35

LimitaPonofLiability.Vendor’sliabilityforalldamages,whetherincontract,tortorotherwisearisingoutoforinconnecPonwiththisAgreement,includingfromanyandallclaimsrelatedtothebreachofthisAgreementornonperformancebyVendor...shallnotexceedtheamountoftheLicenseFee.WithoutlimiPngtheforegoing,innoeventwillVendorbeliableforanylostorprospecPveprofits,indirect,incidental,consequenPal,special,exemplaryorpuniPvedamages,arisingoutoforinconnecPonwiththisAgreement...

RevisedContractLanguage

36

ü Considerwhethertoincludeadirectdamagecap.ü Chooseareasonableamountforthecap.ü DefinelostprofitsaseitherdirectorconsequenPaldamages.

ü EnsurethatthelimitaPonofliabilitycoversallavailableformsofpotenPalliability.

ü Considerwhetherthereareanyclaims(suchasindemnifiablethirdpartyclaimsorbreachesofconfidenPality)thatshouldbeoutsidethelimitaPonofliability.

DraXingConsidera.ons

37

INDEMNIFICATION

38

Apromisebytheindemnitortosafeguardorholdtheindemniteeharmlessagainstexis.ngor

futurelossorliability,orboth.

Defini.on

39

Isonepartylikelytocreateriskorliabilityfortheotherparty?

Whatwouldbetheresultintheabsenceofanindemnity?

Ifnot,theriskshouldbeshiYedtotheliability-creaPngparty.

Isthatthe“fair”result?

DecisionPath

40

»  Thirdpartyclaimsonlyoralllosses?» Whatlossesarecovered?»  Indemnifyv.defend»  IndemnificaPonprocedures»  EffectofindemnificaPononotherprovisions»  Isindemnityanexclusiveremedy?»  LiabilitycapsandotherlimitaPons

CommonNego.a.onPoints

41

»  Indemnify––  toreimbursesomeoneforalosssufferedandpaidbythatperson–  acer-the-fact

»  Defend––  totakeacPonstoprotectsomeoneagainstaloss–  ongoingobligaPon

»  HoldHarmless––  Acourtmayconstruea“holdharmless”obligaPontobemore

broadlydefinedthanintended.

Indemnifyv.Defend

42

»  NoPceandremediesforunPmelynoPce»  Conflictsofinterest»  CooperaPonandassistance

–  Internalcosts/out-of-pocketcosts»  ReporPngto(andparPcipaPonof)theotherparty

–  ApprovalrightsornoPceonly?»  Approvalofsewlements

–  IndemnifiedPartyshouldhaverighttoapproveanysewlementthatinvolvesanythingotherthanapaymentofmoneybytheIndemnifyingParty.

Indemnifica.onProcedures

43

ControlofDefense

44

»  Firstpartyclaimsv.thirdpartyclaimsonly–  Doestheindemnitycoverlossesincurredbythecounterparty?

–  ConsiderlimiPngindemnificaPonobligaPonstothirdpartyclaimsonly.

–  CounterpartymaysPllbeabletosueforbreachofcontract–ifthereisarepresentaPonorcovenantbreached.»  PracPceTip:IncludebotharepresentaPonANDanindemnityobligaPon.

»  CauPon:BreachofrepresentaPonmaynotbeavailableifitisqualifiedbyknowledgeorifindemnityistheexclusiveremedy.

WhatisaClaim?

45

»  Whatlossesarecovered?–  CostsofinternalinvesPgaPons?–  Taxesorsimilarcharges,interestorpenalPes?–  Costsofaworneys’feesandexpertwitnesses?–  Lossesincurredbycustomersorendusers?–  ArbitraPonfees?Courtcosts?

»  PracPceTip:IndemnifyingPartymaywanttotrytolimitlossestofinallyadjudicatedorsewledamountspayabletothirdparPesonly:

–  indemnifytheIndemnifiedPartyagainstanyLossesfinallyawardedagainstsuchpartytoathirdpartymakingsuchClaim,byacourtofcompetentjurisdicPonoragreedtoinsewlementandactuallypaidtosuchthirdparty.

ScopeofLosses

46

»  TimeLimitaPons–  ConsiderincludingPmelimitaPonsfortheindemniteetobringaclaim.

»  Cap–  Considerincludinganoveralllimitofliability.–  Considerexcludingcertaintypesofdamages.

»  Considermakingindemnitythesoleandexclusiveremedy.

Limita.ons

47

ü TimelimitaPons(e.g.,duraPonofrepandwarrantysurvival)

ü DollarlimitaPons(caps,basketsandoffsets)ü Effectsonotherremediesü Shouldtheliabilitycapcoverindemnifiableclaims?ü Howlongshouldtheindemnityclaimssurvive?ü ControlandabilityofindemnifyingpartytoparPcipateindefenseofclaims

ü Choiceoflaw/forum

DraXingConsidera.ons

48

EdBaumPartner-Li.ga.onCrowell&MoringLLP

PaulPollockPartner-CorporateCrowell&MoringLLP

AlanHowardPartner-Li.ga.onCrowell&MoringLLP

IlanaLubinCounsel-CorporateCrowell&MoringLLP

49

ebaum@crowell.com+1212.803.4033

ppollock@crowell.com+1212.895.4216

ahoward@crowell.com+1212.803.4021

ilubin@crowell.com+1212.895.4224

50

EdBaumPartner-LiPgaPonCrowell&MoringLLP+1212.803.4033ebaum@crowell.com

EdBaumisapartnerinCrowell&Moring'sNewYorkofficeandamemberofthefirm'sLiPgaPonGroup(includingleadingtheliPgaPonpracPcesintheNewYorkoffice).Ed'spracPceisconcentratedonrepresenPngpublicandprivately-heldenPPesandtheirprincipalsinmulP-facetedbusiness-relatedliPgaPons.Edrepresentspreeminentmembersofthefinancialservices,entertainment,informaPontechnology,pharmaceuPcal,automoPve,legal,andinsuranceindustries.Heoffersclientsthecombinedbenefitsofextensiveexperienceintheartsoftrialandappellateadvocacy,aswellasin-depthpracPcalknowledgeofmulPplesubstanPvedisciplinesthatareoYeninvolvedintoday'scomplexbusinessdisputes.HiscasesfrequentlyinvolvetheinterplaybetweenthecompePngandatPmesinconsistentlawsgoverningfinancialservices,securiPes,anPtrust,bankruptcy,productandconsumerliability,andthediscriminaPon,compensaPon-related,andunfaircompePPon/tradesecretslawsthatshaperelaPonsbetweenbusinessenPPesandtheirseniorpersonnel.EdregularlyservesasnaPonalorcoordinaPngcounselforclientsfacingclassacPons,governmentalinvesPgaPonsandliPgaPons,orotherpotenPallysignificantmawersrequiringexperienceinmulPpledisciplines.HealsofrequentlycounselsclientsintransacPonalmawersandbusinessplanning,onassessingpotenPalliabiliPes,andindevelopingacPonplanstopreventorminimizeliPgaPonrisks.OtherlawyersandlawfirmsfrequentlyretainEdtocounselandrepresenttheminissuesinvolvingprofessionalresponsibilityandethics,aswellastorepresentthelawfirms—orthechiefexecuPvesandotherseniorofficersofthoseotherlawfirms'clients—inemploymentanddisciplinarymawers.InaddiPon,drawingonhisextensiveformaltrainingandexperienceindisputeresoluPon,EdoYenserves,bothasadvocateandasaneutral,inmediaPons,arbitraPons,andotheralternaPvedisputeresoluPonproceedings.Educa.on•  CornellUniversity,B.S.industrial&laborrelaPons,withhonors•  ColumbiaLawSchool,J.D.;HarlanFiskeStoneScholar

51

PaulPollockisapartnerintheNewYorkofficeofCrowell&MoringandconcentrateshispracPceonmergersandacquisiPonsandcorporatefinance.Heservesasamemberonthefirm'sCorporateGroupSteeringCommiwee.PaulalsoprovidesongoingrepresentaPontomiddlemarketprivateequitysponsorsandtheirpor�oliocompanies,aswellaspublicandprivatecompaniesthatarenotprivateequitybacked.Paul'sindustryexperienceincludesrepresenPngclientsinfinancialservices,manufacturing,telecommunicaPons,soYwareproducts,publishingandentertainment.

Paulrepresentsprivateequitysponsorsandgrowth-orientedcompaniesinexecuPngtheiracquisiPonobjecPves.Heworksonboththebuyandsell-sideofmiddle-marketbusinessesseekingtorealizevaluethroughthesaleoftheirbusinesses,andwithnon-U.S.basedcompanieswhoareseekingtoentertheU.S.marketplace,accesstheU.S.securiPesmarketsortoengageintransacPonswithU.S.companies.

InaddiPon,PaulhasextensivedistresseddebtexperienceincludingworkrepresenPnglenders,buyersandsellersinacquisiPonsbothinandoutsideofbankruptcy,aswellasworkoutsandrefinancingsoftroubledcompanies.ThesetransacPonsincludeassetsales,363sales,andleveragedandnon-leveragedrecapitalizaPons.

PaulworkswithcompaniesthroughtheirenPrelifecycleincludingadvisingontheformaPonandchoiceofbusinessenPty;preparingandnegoPaPngshareholderandlimitedliabilitycompanyagreements,employmentagreementsandothercriPcalcorporatecontracts;advisingonmulPpleroundsofprivateequityfinancinganddebtfinancing;andrepresenPngcompaniesintheiniPalpublicofferingsandinconnecPonwithongoingsecuriPescompliancefilingswork.

InaddiPontorepresenPngissuersinacquisiPonsanddivesPtures,privateandpublicofferingsanddebtfinancings,hehasalsorepresentedunderwritersinpublicofferingsandplacementagentsinprivateplacementsaswellasforeignissuersinconnecPonwithofferingsunderSECRegulaPons.

Educa.on•  ColgateUniversity,B.A.,cumlaude•  FordhamUniversitySchoolofLaw,J.D.

PaulPollockPartner-CorporateCrowell&MoringLLP+1212.895.4216ppollock@crowell.com

52

AlanHowardPartner-LiPgaPonCrowell&MoringLLP+1212.803.4021ahoward@crowell.com

AlanHowardisapartnerinCrowell&Moring'sNewYorkoffice.AlanisanaccomplishedtrialaworneywhohasovertwodecadesofexperiencehandlingliPgaPonandarbitraPonmawersdomesPcallyandinternaPonally.HehastriedcasestojuriesandjudgesinfederalandstatecourtsthroughouttheU.S.andtoarbitratorsinproceedingsundertherulesoftheAmericanArbitraPonAssociaPon,JAMS,andtheInternaPonalChamberofCommerce.

Alanfocusesoncommercialcontractdisputes,oYeninvolvingmanufacturing,producPonand/ordistribuPonofgoods,technologyorsoYware,orjointventures.AlanalsorepresentsparPesengagedinmulPpleproceedingsinmulPplejurisdicPonsandhasparPcularexperiencerepresenPngforeigncompanies,andseniorofficersofforeignanddomesPccompaniesengagedinhighstakesdisputes.HehasextensiveexperiencerepresenPngfinancialinsPtuPons,andinparPcular,intheareaofAnP-MoneyLaunderingregulaPonsandcompliance.Alanalsohastriedanumberofintellectualpropertymawers,includingpatentcases,casesinvolvingtheYoftradesecretsanddisputesinvolvingsoYwareproviders.

Alanalsodoesextensiveprobonowork.HewasleadcounselforthenamedplainPffsinDavidv.SignalInternaPonal,LLC,anacPonbroughtonbehalfofhundredsofskilledworkersfromIndiawhowereluredbyfalsepromisesofgreencardsandforcedtoliveinlaborcampsandworkinmarinefabricaPonfaciliPesinMississippiandTexasin2006-2007.TheacPoninvolvedclaimsofforcedlabor,traffickinginforcedlabor,civilRICO,discriminaPon,andfraud.Alanledateamthathandledthefirsttrial,onbehalfoffiveworkers,thattookplaceinJanuaryandFebruary2015beforeafederaljuryinNewOrleans,Louisiana.ThattrialresultedinaverdictforplainPffsonallclaimsagainstalldefendantsandanawardofcompensatoryandpuniPvedamagestotalingover$14million.Thiswasoneofthelargestcasesofitskindeverbroughtandoneofthelargestverdictseverobtainedinthistypeofcase.

AlanisthechairoftheBoardofDirectorsoftheSouthernPovertyLawCenter.

Educa.on•  YaleUniversity,B.A.,magnacumlaude•  HarvardLawSchool,J.D.,cumlaude

53

IlanaLubinisacounselinCrowell&Moring'sNewYorkofficeandamemberofthefirm'sCorporateGroup.Ilanafrequentlyrepresentsclientsintheapparel,fashion,retail,luxury,andbeautysectorsregardingcross-borderanddomesPcmergersandacquisiPons,jointventures,andprivateequityinvestments.ShealsorouPnelydraYsandnegoPatesintellectualpropertylicensingandothergeneralcorporateandcommercialtransacPons,andshehasexperienceworkingin-houseacrossbusinessunits,includinginconnecPonwithglobalmergerandacquisiPonandlicensingacPvity.Ilana'sbackgroundincludestherepresentaPonofavarietyofcompaniesfromincepPon,includingadvisementwithrespecttomawersrelaPngtoformaPonandstructuring,equityanddebtfinancing,employment,andcommercialleasing.Educa.on•  CornellUniversity,B.S.,policyanalysisandmanagement•  BenjaminN.CardozoSchoolofLaw,J.D.

IlanaLubinCounsel-CorporateCrowell&MoringLLP+1212.895.4224ilubin@crowell.com

top related