thatcherism - ideology, policies and relevance today
Post on 07-Nov-2014
116 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
GRG23 / VBS Draschestraße 90-92, A-1230 Wien
Unterrichtsjahr 2011/2012
Fachbereichsarbeit in Geographie und Wirtschaftskunde
Verfasser: Leander C. Seidl
Betreuungslehrer: Mag. Christopher Hanacek-Schubert MAS MAIS
Abgabedatum: 17.2.2012
2
Erklärung
Ich erkläre hiermit eidesstattlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit eigenständig und nur unter
Verwendung der angeführten Hilfsmittel verfasst habe.
Wien, am 17. Februar 2012 Leander C. Seidl
3
Contents
1. Preamble ...................................................................................................... 4
2. Introduction ................................................................................................. 5
2. 1. Brief Biography and Summary of Margaret Thatcher’s Term in Office .... 5
2.2. The British Economy in the late 1970s and the Winter of Discontent .... 6
2.3. Margaret Thatcher’s Ideology ................................................................ 8
2.3.1. Neoliberalism ................................................................................... 8
2.3.2. Monetarism ..................................................................................... 9
3. Thatcher’s Economic Policy ........................................................................ 11
3.1. Tax and Monetary Policy ........................................................................ 11
3.2. Reform of Social Services and Education ................................................ 13
3.3. Privatisation and Deregulation ............................................................... 17
3.4. Relationship with Unions ........................................................................ 19
4. The Influence of Thatcherism on British Politics in Recent Years................ 21
5. Conclusion ................................................................................................. 23
6. Abstract ..................................................................................................... 25
7. List of Sources ............................................................................................ 27
8. Work Log .................................................................................................... 33
4
1. Preamble
When discussing the most influential political leaders of the late 20th century, only few
choose not to mention the former British PM Margaret Thatcher. No matter whether she is
praised as a conservative heroine or regarded as a nemesis by followers of a more socialist
ideology, almost everyone who talks about her has an opinion on the woman that is
frequently referred to as the “Iron Lady”. It is also for that reason that I already had a very
vague general idea of what her policy consisted of. Since I had wanted to find out more
about her for years, the decision of making Thatcherism and its influence on today’s politics
the topic of my FBA was easily made.
Work on this paper has not only given me a lot of knowledge on Thatcherism itself, but also
helped me gain an insight on unique aspects of the British economic and political system. For
example, I did not know about the complex structure behind the British healthcare and
school systems.
Apart from the new things I learned through research on the topic, I also got valuable
insights into the amount of time, effort and determination that is required in order to
complete a pre-scientific paper. Therefore I believe that choosing to write this work was a
highly beneficial experience for me which I will very probably be able to draw upon in the
future. Finally, I would like to thank my supervising teacher, Mag. Christopher Hanacek-
Schubert for his continued support and advice during my work on the FBA, which helped me
to overcome initial difficulties.
I hope that my work makes for an interesting read and I hope that you, the reader, are able
to gain a deeper understanding of Margaret Thatcher’s economic policy, the implications of
it beyond her term and the British economy in general.
5
2. Introduction
2. 1. Brief Biography and Summary of Margaret Thatcher’s Term in Office
Margaret Hilda Thatcher, née Roberts was born on October 13, 1925 in Grantham, as the
daughter of a businessman who was engaged in local politics. She was a successful student
during her time in primary and secondary education, allowing her to get into a grammar
school and be accepted at the University of Oxford after graduating. While studying
chemistry at Oxford from 1943 to 1947 she emerged as a strong supporter of conservatism
and after having received her degree, she ran for a seat in parliament in both the general
elections of both 1950 and 1951. While her attempts were unsuccessful, her speeches
earned respect from many conservative politicians and during her campaigns she met her
future husband, Daniel Thatcher. In 1959, Margaret Thatcher finally managed to win a seat
in Parliament and in 1961 she became the undersecretary for pensions and national
insurance. 1 2 3
Between 1964 and 1970, while Labour was in power, Thatcher was part of the shadow
cabinet and once the Conservative Party had won the election of 1970 she became Secretary
of State for Education under PM Edward Heath. It was in this office that she first came to the
attention of the general public when she abolished the practice of free milk at school for all
children below the age of 12. The Heath government was all in all not well received, and the
1974 elections brought about a new government led by Labour. The next year, Thatcher
decided to challenge Heath’s leadership of the Conservative party, which – to her own
surprise – was successful. She spent four years as leader of the opposition before she
successfully called for a vote of no confidence in the Labour government and won the
ensuing general elections of 1979, entering office as the first female Prime Minister in Britain
on May 4, 1979. She remained in power for more than a decade, winning the elections of
1983 and 1987 until having to resign in 1990.1 2 3
Apart from her economic policy, which will be analysed in the third chapter of this work,
some other noteworthy elements of her time as Prime Minister were her foreign policy and
her refusal to meet the demands of the Irish Republican Army, which led to a hotel she was
staying at being bombed in 1984, killing 5 people but leaving Thatcher unharmed. She was
on friendly terms with US president Ronald Reagan, with whom she shared many economic
ideas – Thatcherism and Reaganomics are often mentioned together – and a dislike for
communist regimes. Her criticism of communism also lead to a soviet newspaper creating
the nickname “Iron Lady”, by which she is still referred to today. 4 Often considered the most
1 http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp - accessed on February 3, 2012
2 http://www.biography.com/people/margaret-thatcher-9504796 - accessed on February 3, 2012
3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher - accessed on February 3, 2012
4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Lady - accessed on February 3, 2012
6
famous part of her foreign policy is her reaction to the invasion of the Falkland Islands by
Argentina's Military Junta in April 1982. When a diplomatic solution failed, she did not
decide to abandon the territories as many experts would have expected, but ordered a
military intervention to retake the islands which was successful by June 1982.5 Because
Britain was still suffering from the effects of a recession and her economic measures were
not well received by many citizens, many analysts argue that without her victory against
Argentine, she would not have been able to win the elections in 1983. Her decision for war
was mostly well received by the public and analysts, with only a few criticising the choice as
being too extreme, as it caused a few hundred deaths on both sides.1 2 3
The end of Thatcher’s time as British PM came during her third term, in November 1990. Her
scepticism against integrating Britain further into the European community, her determined
style of leadership and her refusal to back away from the heavily criticised community
charges were some of the elements that lead to poor poll results for the Conservative Party
and disgruntled many of its members. Her party leadership was challenged by Michael
Heseltine, and while she narrowly won the first vote, a second ballot had to be held. At first
determined to win this ballot, she saw no other choice than to resign the next day,
November 28 1990, when many members of her cabinet renounced their support of her,
stating their belief that she would not be able to win another election. The Conservative
party ended up electing John Major as her successor - who was described by the media as
being the protégé of the resigning PM when he took office - and Margaret Thatcher’s career
as a politician ended with the general elections of 1992, when she did not run again for a
seat in parliament. 1 3 6
2.2. The British Economy in the late 1970s and the Winter of Discontent
The government preceding Thatcher‘s rule was led by the Labour Party under Harold Wilson
from 1974 until 1976, when he stepped down and James Callaghan took over. Callahan
remained PM until a vote of no confidence and the following elections in 1979. During its
rule, the Labour government was faced with problems of the British economy. While in the
early 1970s, the end of the Bretton Woods monetary system combined with a sharp increase
of energy prices led economies all over the world into economic problems or even recession,
this development was especially visible in Britain. Its economy entered a state that was
labelled “Stagflation” – economic growth stagnated while unemployment and inflation were
on the rise. Inflation in Britain reached a peak level in 1975, being as large as 24.2%. Since
the number of people out of work was still going up, as was the budget deficit, the
5 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/themargaretthatcheryears/1895880/Margaret-Thatcher-and-
the-Falklands.html - accessed on February 3, 2012 6 http://articles.latimes.com/1990-11-28/news/mn-4907_1_john-major - accessed on February 3, 2012
7
government was eventually left with no other choice but to take out a loan of 2.3 billion
pounds from the International Monetary Fund in September 1976. This decision was
particularly difficult to make, since it was the first time that a developed western county
asked the IMF for financial aid. In return, it was demanded of Britain that it deeply cut its
public spending, which led to strong debates within the Labour Party. The measures
however did prove to be successful in reducing inflation, which was down to 8.3% by 1978. 7 8 9 10 11
Meanwhile, as another measure against inflation, the “Social Contract” was introduced in
1975, an informal agreement between the government and the British trade unions which
should limit new wage settlements to once a year in order to allow for a safer planning of
budgets.12 The unions tolerated this agreement, realising the problematic state of Britain’s
economy and when inflation numbers got better in 1977, the Chancellor of the Exchequer
Denis Healey announced that in the following year, collective bargaining would return in its
traditional form. However, in the summer of 1978, Healey went back on this announcement
and set a guideline that limited pay increases to 5% for the next year.12
The unions were outraged by this change in policy, and began a series of strikes known as
the “Winter of Discontent” that lasted until February 1979. Among those laying down work
were truck drivers, waste collectors, gravediggers and ancillary workers of the National
Health Service. These strikes led to chaotic circumstances in parts of Britain, waste piling up
in some cities and patients being unable to enter hospitals due to protests being held in
front of them. The result was a strong loss of support for the Labour Party, being one of the
main reasons why it lost to Thatcher’s Conservatives in the following election.13 14 15
By the time Thatcher was sworn into office, inflation had risen to 13.4% again, the unions
had demonstrated their power over the government and the way many sectors of the British
industry worked was considered inefficient by Thatcher and her followers, which set the
stage for parts of the economic programme she implemented.16 17
7 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/sterling-devalued-imf-loan.htm - accessed on
February 10, 2012 8 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/timeline/present_timeline_noflash.shtml - accessed on February 10,
2012 9 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4553464.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012
10 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation - accessed on February 10, 2012
11 http://safalra.com/other/historical-uk-inflation-price-conversion/ - accessed on February 10, 2012
12 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Contract_%28Britain%29 - accessed on February 10, 2012
13 http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/22/newsid_2506000/2506715.stm - accessed on
February 10, 2012 14
http://econ.economicshelp.org/2010/02/economy-of-1970s.html - - accessed on February 10, 2012 15
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3067563.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012 16
http://safalra.com/other/historical-uk-inflation-price-conversion - accessed on February 10, 2012 17
http://www.economicshelp.org/2010/02/thatcher-revolution-1980s.html - accessed on February 10, 2012
8
2.3. Margaret Thatcher’s Ideology
2.3.1. Neoliberalism
Margaret Thatcher’s policy today is often described as being neoliberal, and for some,
neoliberalism and Thatcherism can in fact be seen as synonyms.18 There are many different
definitions of what neoliberalism constitutes, varying from continent to continent and
according to the general perspective of the analyst.19 Most economists however, agree that
neoliberalism, in the form that is present in Europe and North America, originated from
traditional Liberalism, which became a common school of thought in Europe around the end
of the 18th century, promoting less interference of the state in the individual`s decisions and
aiming towards a state in which decisions are made not in order to follow a certain goal, but
solely as consequences of the processes that occur.19 20 Today, the term “Liberalism”, like
neoliberalism, is used in a multitude of ways, with the existence of political liberalism, which
is frequently used analogous to the word progressive in the USA, and economic liberalism on
which neoliberalism is based.21
The term neoliberalism was first introduced in the 1930s and was defined in great detail
after the Second World War by the Austrian economist Friedrich August von Hayek. He
follows the Liberal assumption that the order of the economy is only a consequence of
spontaneous processes and comes to the conclusion that the economy works best when it
does not follow a set plan or regulations given by the government.22 The main goal of
neoliberalism is therefore to reduce and finally abolish any state involvement and regulation
of the free market, which is supposed to lead to an economy that by means of more
competition and flexibility achieves higher profits and efficiency. Because it is very
dependent on market demands, the economy should be able to regulate itself, with as little
legislation by the state as possible.23 Neoliberalism is often contrasted with the economic
beliefs that were first postulated to a broad audience by John Maynard Keynes. The
followers of his ideology strongly support the government taking an active part in the
economy, believing that when the public sector invests money in new projects in times of
recession, the economy is more likely to recover.24
With Thatcher in Great Britain and Ronald Reagan in the USA being the leaders who first
introduced a neoliberal agenda, it has been one of the main ideologies in global economics 18
http://aussieinnovation.com/content/how-neoliberal-was-margaret-thatcher - accessed on February 6, 2012 19
http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html - accessed on February 6, 2012 20
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism#French_Revolution - accessed on February 6, 2012 21
http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#PoliticalversusEconomicLiberalism - accessed on February 6, 2012 22
http://www.khbrodbeck.homepage.t-online.de/neolib.htm - accessed on February 6, 2012 23
http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#Neoliberalismis - accessed on February 6, 2012 24
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-keynesian-economics.htm
9
ever since. Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo Garcia, activists for the NGO “National Network
for Immigrant and Refugee Rights”, believe among many other critics that the benefits of
neoliberal reforms only arrive at companies and members of the upper class, while workers
suffer from great disadvantages. They argue that companies have less legal requirements to
fulfill certain standards regarding the treatment of their employees and that less state
involvement will also lead to a reduction of public social services. While the latter would in
itself not be a great problem for individuals with sufficient wealth, members of the working
class would be faced with great difficulties.25 Other critics also see neoliberalism, with its
belief in a self-regulating economy, as one of the causes for the financial crisis that started in
2007. As the journalist Anup Shah mentions in an article, even Alan Greenspan, former head
of the US Federal Reserve, who was known to be a supporter of neoliberal ideology,
admitted that he “found a flaw in the model that I [Greenspan] perceived is the critical
functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak.”26
2.3.2. Monetarism
Another key part of Thatcher’s economic policy was her belief in monetarism. The main
proposition of Monetarism, which to a great extent was shaped by the American economist
Milton Friedman, is that money supply is the main factor in determining the national output
in the short term and the level of inflation in the long term. He comes to this conclusion by
interpreting the equation of exchange - which is considered valid by most economists,
regardless of their stance on monetarism – in a way that assumes that the amount of times
money changes hands per year is almost the same every year. Through this assumption,
which is doubted by critics of monetarism, especially those who rather believe in a
Keynesian approach, monetarists believe that money supply will either change the price
level or the amount of goods produced each year. Therefore, monetarists argue that
controlling the amount of new money printed by a government should be its main tool to
ensure a stable economy, rather than using fiscal policies. This stance is also caused by the
fact that monetarism, similar to neoliberalism, aims towards a free market with as little
government involvement as possible, since its followers fear that government intervention is
more likely to worsen the state of the economy.27 28 29
According to Friedman’s theory, the ideal monetary policy is having the rate of money supply
steadily rise each year, since this will lead to steady economic growth and prevent high
25
http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376 - accessed on February 6, 2012 26
http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#GoingbustTheGlobalFinancialCrisisShakesConfidence - accessed on February 6, 2012 27
http://www.econweb.com/MacroWelcome/monetarism/notes.html - accessed on February 9, 2012 28
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monetarism.asp#axzz1lv65TBRl - accessed on February 9, 2012 29
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/389146/monetarism - accessed on February 9, 2012
10
inflation. However, this interpretation of monetarism proved to be less successful than
expected during the early 1980s when it was most popular, and the direct link between
monetary supply and economic growth rates is doubted by many economists today. 30
30
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monetarism.asp#axzz1lv65TBRl - accessed on February 6, 2012
11
3. Thatcher’s Economic Policy
3.1. Tax and Monetary Policy
Margaret Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister is frequently associated with remembered for
massive tax cuts. However, as economist Bruce Bartlett points out in an article for the New
York Times, this is actually not the case, as for the first seven years of Thatcher’s
government, the total amount of taxes as a percentage of the GDP actually rose, only
declining in the final years of her leadership and still being higher when she left office than
at the time of her inauguration.31 Thatcher’s changes to the tax system show characteristics
of her neoliberal ideology: she believed in the reduction of direct taxes, such as the
progressive income tax, since they, in her opinion, reduce people’s incentive to work harder,
while supporting an increase of indirect taxes like the VAT and other consumption taxes.32
The earliest tax reforms, made in her very first year as Prime Minister, therefore reduced the
maximum rate of the personal income tax from 83% to 60% and its base rate from 33% to
30%, meanwhile increasing the value-added tax from 8% to 15% as well as the motor fuel tax
and the national insurance contributions that were mandatory for every British Citizen.32 This
lead to critique that continued throughout her term in office, which said that through her
changes to the taxation system, she shifted the burden from the rich towards the middle
class and poor, who were mainly affected by the increase of indirect taxes.33 Thatcher
nonetheless continued this policy, increasing both direct income taxes and indirect
consumption taxes in 1981 in order to fight the country’s deficit and steer against rising
inflation numbers. The level of indirect taxes was kept high throughout the 1980s while the
government returned to its policy of cuts on income taxes in the following years. In the
budget of 1988, the highest rate of the income tax was lowered to 40%, the basic rate was
set to 25%.33 34 35
One of Margaret Thatcher’s most frequently debated changes to British tax law was the
introduction of the community charge in the years 1988 to 1990. This tax was introduced in
order to partially fund the services provided by local governments and replaced the system
of rates. Rates were collected from every homeowner and were based on the value of their
property, and since it had been in effect in a similar form since the 17th century and required
regular revaluation of properties which in turn led to much administrative work, it was
31
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/the-legend-of-margaret-thatcher/ - accessed on February 8, 2012 32
http://www.zum.de/whkmla/sp/changhyun/ThatcherPolicies4.html - accessed on February 8, 2012 33
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_taxation_in_the_United_Kingdom#20th_century - accessed on February 8, 2012 34
http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/111449 - accessed on February 8, 2012 35
http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/income-tax - accessed on February 8, 2012
12
considered outdated by Thatcher.36 37 The new community charge, which is often referred to
as “poll tax” was no longer based on the value of each property, instead using a flat-tax
model according to which every citizen had to pay the amount set by the regional authority.
The only exceptions were students and the unemployed, who had to pay 20% of the set tax.
Not only did the introduction of the community charge lead to new administrative problems
since the records of who lived in which household were disorganized in many parts of Britain
but they also led to mass protests throughout Britain, since many parts of the public saw the
new tax as yet another shift of financial burdens from richer citizens, who had to pay higher
charges under the system of rates due to the larger value of their property, to the average
people, who often had to pay significantly larger amounts into the poll tax regime.37 38
Protests demanding to bring back the old system were held all over Britain in 1990 and
finally culminated in the violent protests at London’s Trafalgar Square on March 31 that are
today known as the Poll Tax Riots and led to more than a hundred people being injured and
many more being arrested. Thatcher still remained stern on introducing the community
charge, in spite of critique arising even from her own party, and this determination to bring
about a reform that is that unpopular is often cited as one of the reasons leading to the
challenge of her leadership of the conservative party followed by her resignation in
November of the same year.38 39 The practice of community charges did not stay in place for
a long time; it was replaced under her successor John Major in 1993 by the council tax, a
system similar to rates, based on the value of residential property.40 41
Thatcher’s policy on the supply of money and interest rates was marked by the fight against
inflation during the first years in office. Following her monetarist ideology (see chapter
2.3.2.), she mainly tried to reduce it by setting fixed goals for the amount of new money
printed while also increasing the interest rates in Britain. While these measures were
successful in reducing inflation, some critics believe that they impeded the growth of the
economy and eventually led to the recession that hit Britain from 1980 to 1982. During her
later years in office, the Prime Minister came to the conclusion that monetary targets were
becoming harder to achieve in the increasingly deregulated economy of Great Britain and
replaced it with a new policy of exchange rate targets. This move was again criticised by
some economists who believed that setting the goal of three D-Mark for one pound was the
main cause that inflation numbers began to rise again in the second half of the 1980s.42 43 44
36
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rates_%28tax%29#United_Kingdom - accessed on February 8, 2012 37
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/14/newsid_2495000/2495911.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012 38
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Charge - accessed on February 8, 2012 39
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8593158.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012 40
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/your_money/tax_index_ew/council_tax.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012 41
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_Tax - accessed on February 8, 2012 42
http://www.bized.co.uk/current/mind/2003_4/170504.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012 43
http://econ.economicshelp.org/2010/02/thatcher-revolution-1980s.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
13
3.2. Reform of Social Services and Education
Under Margaret Thatcher, several changes were made to the British Health, Education and
Pension systems. These reforms did not lead to a total change of the way these services
were provided, with all of these services still being chiefly provided by the state itself, but
they did lead to some alterations.45
The National Health Service, commonly abbreviated NHS, was for example restructured
gradually in order to increase the amount of private health services, to introduce elements
of internal competition and increase the NHS’ efficiency. The National Health Service has
been providing healthcare for all British citizens since 1948, with the majority of services
being free of charge, the exception being certain medications, eye treatments and dental
services that are still comparatively cheap. 46 47 One noteworthy difference between the
British public healthcare system and those present in many other European countries,
Austria being one of them, is that it is not funded by social security, but entirely through
taxes.48 49
The reforms were deemed necessary because the way the system was managed was often
criticised, most famously in a report by Roy Griffiths to Parliament in 1984, and because the
amount of money spent to keep up these services was constantly increasing ever since the
establishment of the NHS due to higher costs and demands of the public for more advanced
treatments.50 51 While the first reforms only led to a small increase of privately funded
treatments and did not have any immediate effects on the health system as such, the
measures taken after Griffith’s report was released caused some uproar from doctors and
nurses.50 They led to the replacement of “consensus management” by the newly introduced
practice of “general management”. While “consensus management” meant that decisions
were made by a group that included both members of the medical staff and the
administrative staff, “general management” put one person solely in charge of making
important decisions in a certain hospital or district. This change stirred up fear among some
member of the British medical staff, who feared that they would now be overruled by
44
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Lawson#In_government - accessed on February 8, 2012 45
http://politics.beasts.org/scripts/celebrity?celebid=546327666 - accessed on February 8, 2012 46
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_%28England%29 - accessed on February 8, 2012 47
http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/about/Pages/overview.aspx - accessed on February 8, 2012 48
http://www.springermedizin.at/artikel/1738-grossbritannien-holt-im-gesundheitswesen-auf - accessed on February 8, 2012 49
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/saco/pdf/101_en.pdf - accessed on February 8, 2012 50
http://www.hsj.co.uk/resource-centre/best-practice/the-griffiths-report-25-years-on/5001481.article - accessed on February 8, 2012 51
http://www.healthp.org/node/71 - accessed on February 8, 2012
14
managers coming from the private sector with expertise on cost-effectiveness but no
experience in health matters.50
The second important change to the British Healthcare system implemented under Thatcher
was the introduction of an internal market within the NHS, which was put into effect with
the National Health Service and Community Care Act of 1990.52 53 Following its introduction,
the regional health authorities were no longer in charge of directly providing health services
themselves, but had to assess which health services were needed in their respective areas
and negotiate with the local health providers such as hospitals, who were now competing
with each other to get contracted by their regional authorities. To be eligible to offer health
services under the reformed NHS system, health organisations were transformed into so
called “NHS trusts”, enabling them to act more independently, but also making them reliant
on getting enough contracts to stay financially afloat.54 55
Like most of her reforms, Thatcher’s changes of the British health system are viewed with
mixed opinions today, some praising them as a measure to cut the rising costs of the system
while potentially increasing the quality of service for the patients thanks to the introduction
of competition. Critics of her health policy believe that it created regional differences in the
quality of healthcare and that it contradicted the principle of providing the same level of free
healthcare to every British citizen on which the NHS was originally introduced and some of
the changes she introduced were later reverted by the government of New Labour PM Tony
Blair. 53 55 56
Margaret Thatcher’s alterations of the pension system were also aimed at reducing the
amount of money the government had to spend to sustain it. They mainly consisted of two
changes: in 1981, the basic state pension was detached from the average national wages
and linked to average prices of goods instead. Until then, changes in the average wages
automatically led to pensions rising in the same amount, which usually was higher than the
inflation rate.57 58
In 1986, measures were taken that were originally supposed to lead to the abolishment of
the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme (SERPS), which was introduced by the Labour led
52
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_and_Community_Care_Act_1990 - accessed on February 8, 2012 53
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/background_briefings/your_nhs/85952.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012 54
http://www.nhs.uk/Tools/Documents/HistoryNHS.html - accessed on February 8, 2012 55
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_National_Health_Service_%28England%29#Development_of_the_NHS_.28England.29_and_NHS_Wales_since_1970 - accessed on February 8, 2012 56
http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/about/Pages/nhscoreprinciples.aspx - accessed on February 8, 2012 57
http://www.watsonwyatt.com/render.asp?id=10187&catid=2 - accessed on February 8, 2012 58
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/finkelstein_speech.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012
15
government in the 1970s to increase the basic state pensions of people who were not
subject to a pension plan given by their employer. It paid out 25% of the average income
that the retiree received during the best 20 years of earning. In the early 1980s, most
experts came to the conclusion that the costs of this system were much higher than
expected and that it would not be sustainable over a longer period of time. However, since
parts of the public, the political opposition and even insurance companies and some
members of the conservative party were in favour of keeping SERPS, Thatcher could not
entirely dissolve it. The changes introduced with the 1986 Social Security act therefore set
about to convince workers to opt out of SERPS. The possibility of saving a percentage of
one’s pre-tax income into a private pension was introduced, while from 1988 onwards the
amount paid out through SERPS was reduced to 20% of the 20 years with the highest
income. The number of British citizens who chose to abandon SERPS was much larger than
initially expected by the government, which anticipated that 300.000 workers would choose
to leave SERPS by 1988, while in reality the number reached 3.2 million by 1988 and 5.5
million by 1995.57 58 59
The linking of the basic state pension to average prices in 1981 was accepted by most people
since it was introduced in a time where Britain was faced with economic problems caused by
the recession of the early 1980s and it did not create any immediate disadvantages for its
recipients, with the decline of the affected pensions in comparison to the income of an
average worker only becoming visible after some years. The actions set to create and
promote alternatives to SERPS can be seen as successful in convincing many citizens to leave
the state funded program, which was finally abolished in 2002 under Tony Blair’s New
Labour government. However, it also caused disadvantages for many people who left SERPS
due to misinformation and pressure from insurance companies. Some chose to change to a
private pension at a point where they would have received higher pensions from the State
Earnings Related Pension Scheme, while others chose to leave their companies’ pension plan
for a private pension with little or no financial participation from their employer.57 Today, as
the results of Thatcher’s changes to the pension system become fully visible, they are
frequently criticised. The Marxist magazine Gegenstandpunkt, for example, sees Margaret
Thatcher’s government responsible for lowering pensions to a point where “[…] an ordinary
employee’s state pension is frequently below the official poverty line and is supplemented by
welfare benefits so that in the end it barely suffices to scrape a living”.60
Thatcher’s policy on the British Education System can on the one hand be characterised
similarly to her stance on many other services provided by the state. Her goal was to
increase quality while reducing costs and allowing for more competition within the system
59
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Earnings-Related_Pension_Scheme - accessed on February 8, 2012 60
http://gegenstandpunkt.com/english/UK-social-reforms.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
16
by giving more possibilities to private institutions and investors. On the other hand, several
steps were taken to reduce “left-wing” ideology that many members of the conservative
party saw within the curriculum and among the staff of the local education authorities,
which were said to be dominated by members of the labour party.61 62
During the 1970s - despite Thatcher’s opposition to the trend during her time as Minister of
Education - the so called “Tripartite system”, where children were split up into three types of
schools according to their abilities after having completed primary education and a final
exam at the age of 11, was replaced by a system of comprehensive secondary schools in
most parts of England.61 63 Still being against this change as Prime Minister, she attempted to
halt it in 1979 by lifting the order to the education authorities to transform all remaining
grammar schools into comprehensive schools, and later, with the Education Reform Act
1988, introduced City Technology Colleges as a new alternative to comprehensive schools.
These Colleges are funded in part by private investors and unlike the other secondary
schools, are not controlled by regional departments but answer directly to the Department
for Education. The introduction of comprehensive education was, however, well received in
Britain at the time, and the number of City Technology Colleges stayed far behind the
government’s expectations, with only 15 opening, most of which converted to the newly
created “academy” system in the early 2000s.62 64
The Education Reform Act 1988 reduced the power of local authorities in other ways as well:
they were now required to take the wishes of students and parents into consideration when
assigning them to secondary schools, a task that until then was done almost automatically.65
Additionally, Local Management was introduced, which allowed schools to control their
budgets on their own, without having to consult their regional education authority first and
schools were given the possibility to become “Grant-maintained schools” if the majority of
parents was in favour of the step. Grant-maintained schools were completely independent
from their local authority and were funded directly by the government. Over the next
decade, a total of about 1200 schools became grant-maintained, until the system was
abolished in 1998 by Tony Blair’s government. 62 66 A “National Curriculum” was also
introduced with the Act of 1988, which both set the values and goals that the British
education system should follow and certain targets in key subjects that students should
meet at the end of each of four key stages.61 62 To assess whether the targets are met,
standard assessment tests were introduced in English, Mathematics and Science. The
61
http://www.educationengland.org.uk/history/chapter08.html - accessed on February 10, 2012 62
http://www.earlhamsociologypages.co.uk/conthatnewright.html#New_Right - accessed on February 10, 2012 63
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_school#United_Kingdom - accessed on February 10, 2012 64
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Technology_College - accessed on February 10, 2012 65
http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/younglevin.html - accessed on February 10, 2012 66
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant-maintained_school - accessed on February 10, 2012
17
national curriculum is still in practice today in a similar manner to when it was introduced in
1988, although extensive changes are discussed at the moment.67 68
Thatcher’s policy on higher education and universities also led to much controversy since
under her leadership, students and professors perceived their institutes’ budgets as being
significantly lowered, despite contradicting announcements by the government. These
conflicts escalated to the point that in 1985, Oxford University decided not to award an
honorary doctorate to Thatcher in protest of her measures, making her the first Oxford
alumna who became a Prime Minister and did not receive such a degree.69 70 71
3.3. Privatisation and Deregulation
Privatisation and de-nationalisation are among the measures that are most commonly
associated with Margaret Thatcher’s term in office.72 73 However, the very first acts of
privatization in Britain, albeit on a very small scale, were actually committed by the
preceding government led by PM James Callaghan, a member of the Labour party, who sold
a small stake in British Petroleum due to pressure by the IMF in 1977.74 75 Thatcher’s
government itself hardly practiced any kind of privatisation during its first years in office and
the first partial sales of national companies, among them being half the shares of Cable and
Wireless plc. and 51% of Britoil, were not mainly done for ideological reasons, but mainly to
counteract the countries debts after the recession of 1980 and 1981. 75 76 77
Only after the successful sale of 51% of shares of British Telecom to private investors in 1984
- much more stock being requested than available by both British citizens, often investing in
stocks for the first time in their lives and investment banks, did the Thatcher government
decide to make privatisation one of their main political tasks.77 78 79 This was done in order to
67
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Curriculum_%28England,_Wales_and_Northern_Ireland%29 - accessed on February 10, 2012 68
http://www.insidegovernment.co.uk/children/reform-curriculum/ - accessed on February 15, 2012 69
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premiership_of_Margaret_Thatcher#Domestic_criticism - accessed on February 10, 2012 70
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/29/newsid_2506000/2506019.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012 71
http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/mcintyre/papers/LHCE/uk-higher-education.html - accessed on February 10, 2012 72
http://www.answers.com/topic/thatcherism-2 - accessed on February 1, 2012 73
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3636207/Margaret -Thatcher-Radical-visionary-who-rescued-Britain.html - accessed on February 1, 2012 74
http://www.privatizationbarometer.net/atlas.php?id=9&mn=PM - accessed on February 1, 2012 75
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2000/nov/22/thatcher.politics1- accessed on February 1, 2012 76
http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf80.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012 77
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/51ccaa1c-20c2-11e1-816d-00144feabdc0.html - accessed on February 1, 2012 78
http://www.libertystory.net/LSUNFORGETTHATCHER.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012 79
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4061613.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012
18
increase the efficiency of the British industry and liberalise Britain’s economy, which caused
the process of deregulating and selling state-owned companies to gain pace: in 1985, a law
to deregulate to a great extent the state owned bus services was introduced, in 1986, British
Gas plc. was fully sold on the stock market, in 1987 British Airways and the British Airport
Authority were made public among others and in 1988, British Steel was privatised. 80 81 82
The initial success of the majority of sales of formerly state-owned companies that occurred
during Thatcher’s leadership was partially brought about by advertising campaigns aimed at
convincing British citizens to invest in shares of newly privatised companies, such as the “Tell
Sid” campaign accompanying the sale of British Gas plc..77 81 It also coincided with the
measures of modernisation and deregulation of the London Stock Exchange taken in 1986,
known as the “Big Bang”.83 These reforms were aimed at increasing the competitiveness of
London in comparison to other global financial hubs and created the possibility for banks to
become brokers themselves, while also abolishing fixed commissions for brokers and
introducing an electronic trading system, resulting in a period of growth for the London
Stock Exchange and Britain’s financial sector in general.83 84 85
To account for the loss of direct state control in many parts of the national infrastructure,
several new authorities were set up to regulate the newly created free market such as Ofgas,
Oftel or London Buses Limited.86 87
The effects of Margaret Thatcher’s privatisation policies are still controversially debated
today as opinions differ on whether the results de-nationalisation had on Britain’s economy
are mainly positive or negative. Most analysts agree that Thatcher’s reforms paved the way
for further privatisations enforced by her successors, such as the privatisation of the British
railway system, some viewing her measures as a counterpart to Clement Attlee’s policy, who
started a strong trend towards nationalisation after World War II.88 89 Positive effects that
are attributed to de-nationalisation under Thatcher are the ending of monopolies in many
industries, creating more competition and thus lowering the prices that the consumer has to
pay.82 It is also widely accepted that inconveniences that existed in state-owned companies
such as lack of friendly and efficient customer support or outdated technologies soon
disappeared once these enterprises were sold and faced with private competition.78
80
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Act_1985 - accessed on February 1, 2012 81
http://www.gasarchive.org/privatisation1.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012 82
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2001/mar/20/5 - accessed on February 1, 2012 83
http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Big+Bang- accessed on February 1, 2012 84
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Stock_Exchange#.22Big_Bang.22- accessed on February 1, 2012 85
http://wiki.uiowa.edu/display/06e169/The+Big+Bang- accessed on February 1, 2012 86
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher#Domestic_affairs- accessed on February 1, 2012 87
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatisation_of_London_bus_services- accessed on February 1, 2012 88
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2001/mar/20/5 - accessed on February 1, 2012 89
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Attlee#Nationalisation - accessed on February 1, 2012
19
Another consequence that is seen positively by Thatcher’s followers is that she increased the
number of private shareholders from 3 million to 11.5 million during her term, which helped
raise support among the public for her actions.90 Critics, however, often argue that many
jobs were lost due to measures set in order to increase efficiency of companies that are now
solely focused on achieving high profits to satisfy their shareholders rather than the interests
of the public.75 Also it is claimed that some corporations were privatised at the cost of their
former identity, often being either merged with international businesses or split up into
several smaller firms. One example for this is British Gas plc. which was restructured and
split into two companies in the years 1996 and 1997. These companies were later
restructured themselves and today, the brand name “British Gas” is used by one of these
companies, Centrica plc..91 Another point of critique is that shares for newly privatized
companies were sold for relatively low prices, which lead to high demand from investors and
positive performance but might have reduced the amount of money gained by the state.75 77
92
3.4. Relationship with Unions
Traditionally strong in Britain, the trade union’s influence on politics was very visible during
the 1970s: a conflict between the conservative prime minister Edward Heath and the
National Union of Mineworkers helped the Labour party return to power by winning both
general elections held in 1974, while the “Winter of Discontent” in 1979 played an important
part in ensuring Margaret Thatcher’s victory in the 1979 general election.93
During Margaret Thatcher’s term in office several measures were taken that reduced the
immunity and influence of British unions: With the Trade Union Act of 1984, they were
required to hold a ballot with a majority of positive votes before declaring a strike94, and
several Employment Acts that set a stricter framework for picketing – the act of protesting
directly in front of a workplace to prevent strike-breakers and customers from entering the
premises- took away parts of the immunity that unions had enjoyed until then. It also limited
the use of the closed shop policy – companies declaring that they would only hire workers
that are member of a union. 95 96 97 98 99 100 The recession of the early 1980s, in combination
90
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/what-we-can-learn-from-margaret-thatcher - accessed on February 1, 2012 91
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Gas_plc - accessed on February 1, 2012 92
Stewart Morris, ‘Did the Thatcher governments change Britain?’ 93
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3067563.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012 94
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/49/part/II/1991-02-01?timeline=true&view=plain - accessed on February 1, 2012 95
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/42/enacted?view=plain - accessed on February 1, 2012 96
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/46/enacted?view=plain - accessed on February 1, 2012 97
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Act_1982 - accessed on February 1, 2012
20
with the reforms passed by the government that weakened the unions standing, led to a
strong decline of membership among the unions: while during the 1970s about 12 million
workers were union members, this number was almost cut in half by the late 1980s.93
A conflict between Thatcher’s government and the unions that is referred to as “Britain's
most bitter industrial dispute of recent times”101 is the miners’ strike that started in March
1984 and lasted for one year. Starting out as a strike in a single coal mine in Yorkshire, it
soon led to half of Britain’s miners ceasing to work after the British National Coal Board
announced that 20 mines were to be closed, meaning that 20.000 jobs would be axed.102 The
head of the National Union of Mineworkers, Arthur Scargill, called for a national strike on
March 12, 1984. This later proved to be problematic since no ballot was held as the law
would have required, and in some regions the majority of miners were actually in favour of
remaining at work. This led to the appearance of pickets at mines where workers were still
at work and several violent skirmishes with the police.101
During the strike Thatcher’s government employed a hard stance on the union, due to the
fact that in previous years sufficient reserves of coal had been built up.93 Many workers,
however, were faced with the choice of either returning to work or relying on donations in
order to afford their daily expenses and be able feed their families, since they did not get
paid for the duration of the strike, which lasted longer than most workers initially
expected.103 After one year of protesting, the National Union of Mineworkers was faced with
a decline of striking workers and the perspective that continuing the strike was more likely
to worsen matters for its members than to get the employers to change their position.
Therefore, on March 3, 1985 a small majority of union representatives voted in favour of
ending the strike, despite not having reached a compromise with the government.104 105
Margaret Thatcher’s hard stance on the unions was therefore both successful, as she had
“taken on the strongest union in the land and won”101 and caused a significant loss of power
of the unions, but at the same time controversial, as she treated the unions much harsher
98
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/picketing.html - accessed on February 1, 2012 99
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/TradeUnions/DG_10027549 - accessed on February 1, 2012 100
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picketing_%28protest%29 - accessed on February 1, 2012 101
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3494024.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012 102
http://archiveshub.ac.uk/features/mar04.shtml - accessed on February 1, 2012 103
http://www.wcml.org.uk/timeline/1984/ - accessed on February 1, 2012 104
http://www.unionhistory.info/timeline/1960_2000_Narr_Display_2.php?Where=NarTitle+contains+%27The+1984-85+Miners+Strike%27 - accessed on February 1, 2012
105
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_miners%27_strike_%281984%E2%80%931985%29#The_formal_end - accessed on February 1, 2012
21
than any of her recent predecessors and even referred to the unions as being “the enemy
within”.106
4. The Influence of Thatcherism on British Politics in Recent Years
In the years after Margaret Thatcher’s departure from office, Britain’s economic policy
continued to move in the direction that she and her government had set. Her conservative
successor John Major did not make any drastic turns from her ideology and Bob Jessop,
Professor at the University of Lancaster says that his government “could be interpreted as
'Thatcherism with a grey face'”.107 As part of his policy, he continued to privatize state-
owned businesses, most famously British Rail in 1994..108 109 110 When the Labour Party, led
by Tony Blair, returned to power in 1997, it had also been affected by the Thatcher era. It
was rebranded as “New Labour” and promoted a so called “third way”, which was set in
between Keynesian politics of government intervention and Neoliberal deregulation.106 111 112 The Labour Party no longer called for measures of redistribution, but did continue to
emphasize the role of the state in economics, with the goal of positioning itself as the new
business party in Britain.113 John Kampfner, journalist for the conservative Daily Telegraph,
arrives at the conclusion that the economic policy of Blair’s New Labour government and its
continuation under Gordon Brown can be seen as Thatcherite. Stressing the fact that state
involvement was only intensified in some select ways such as increasing support for the
unemployed and setting minimum wages, he arrives at the conclusion that “Blair not only
confirmed many of her policies, but in some respects actually took them further […]”.114
Kampfner points out that under New Labour, many elements of Thatcherism were left intact,
for example keeping the unions in check and continuing the support for collaborations of the
state with private investors.
Today’s British government - a coalition between the Conservative Party and the Liberal
Democrats, in office since 2010 and led by Conservative PM David Cameron – which aims to
deal with the consequences of the current global economic crisis with the concept of a “Big
Society” is also attributed with promoting some elements of Thatcherism. The Big Society,
which was the main agenda of the 2010 Conservative election programme, is a plan that is
106
http://www.politicalbiography.co.uk/margaret-thatcher-biography/28-margaret-thatcher-and-the-trade-unions.html - accessed on February 1, 2012 107
Bob Jessop, ‘From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-Liberalism, Workfarism, and Labour Market Regulation’ 108
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Major - accessed on February 12, 2012 109
http://osb.revues.org/717 - accessed on February 12, 2012 110
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatisation_of_British_Rail - accessed on February 15, 2012 111
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_way_%28centrism%29 - accessed on February 12, 2012 112
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/458626.stm - accessed on February 12, 2012 113
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/thatcherism_01.shtml - accessed on February 12, 2012 114
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/themargaretthatcheryears/1895878/Margaret-Thatcher-inspiration-to-New-Labour.html - accessed on February 12, 2012
22
promoted by the government as giving more power to local communities. This will be
achieved by reducing centralism and bestowing more power upon the local governments
and authorities as well as private companies and local organisations and charities. These are
to get higher aid by the state for in turn taking on responsibilities that were previously
fulfilled by the welfare state. In 2011, Cameron additionally announced that in the future
private companies and organisations should be able to make offers for taking over almost
any type of public sector work. Because of this practice of increasing private competition to
the public institutions in order to cut costs, many analysts see the government in line with
the privatisation policy of Margaret Thatcher.115 116 117 118
Another part of Cameron’s policy where comparisons between Thatcher and Cameron are
frequently drawn is his reform of the National Health Service. With the Health and Social
Care Bill 2011, Cameron announced plans to greatly restructure the NHS, the biggest
changes being the abolishment of both the strategic health authorities, which distribute the
NHS funds on a regional level and the primary care trusts, which are currently responsible
for planning out the healthcare in their respective areas by commissioning medical care
providers and NHS trusts.119 120 Instead, the budgets are to be distributed to clinical
commissioning groups who take over the responsibilities. Many interpret this as a further act
of privatisation and outsourcing since while these groups are officially to be run by local
General Practitioners, it is expected that private companies will invest and participate in
these groups. 121
While Thatcher herself mainly focused her reforms of the NHS on the introduction of an
internal market and only brought about small steps towards more private money being
involved in the healthcare system, similarities between Cameron’s policy and Thatcherism
can still be found, since his changes would reduce the direct control of public institutions,
handing them over to participants of the free market, one of the main elements of
Thatcherism. However, since the NHS reforms are one of the most fiercely debated parts of
Cameron’s policy, it is not yet known how much of the original plans will be put into practice
once the changes are effective, as the public discussion in Britain is still on-going with parts
of the British public calling for an overhaul of the bill.122 123
115
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/jul2010/came-j20.shtml - accessed on February 12, 2012 116
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Society - accessed on February 12, 2012 117
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12520491 - accessed on February 12, 2012 118
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/100076991/is-david-cameron-reinventing-himself-as-a-thatcherite/ - accessed on February 12, 2012 119
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHS_strategic_health_authority - accessed on February 12, 2012 120
http://www.nhsconfed.org/Networks/PrimaryCareTrust/AboutThePrimaryCareTrustNetwork/Pages/About-the-Priamary-Care-Trust.aspx - accessed on February 12, 2012 121
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_and_Social_Care_Bill_2011 - accessed on February 12, 2012 122
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16632291 - accessed on February 12, 2012 123
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/feb/12/nhs-bill-toxic-conservatives-lansley - accessed on February 12, 2012
23
5. Conclusion
Even to this day there are diverging opinions on the question of whether Margaret
Thatcher’s policy was on the whole a good thing for Britain’s economy. This can be seen, for
example, when looking at the results of a questionnaire among British citizens conducted by
the BBC. Some hail her because they believe that she prepared the British economy for the
future, enabling it to stay competitive by modernising it and reducing the influence of the
unions, which they see as a disadvantage. Other British citizens regard her term as Prime
Minister as a good thing altogether because they were able to personally benefit from it
through investing in shares of newly privatised companies. The people who gave more
critical answers to the BBC mostly dislike exactly these changes: they say that working
conditions tended to become worse and only a relatively small part of the people who
bought stocks really made a significant profit. A number of citizens also mention in their
responses that they generally have the impression that the social climate in the British
society cooled down under Thatcher’s government, with competition increasing while less
opportunities for career and education became available to them.124
Amongst economists and journalists, opinions are split just as much: some praise her, saying
that her reforms modernised Britain and enabled it to stay competitive, creating “popular
capitalism” and inspiring many other countries to turn to Neoliberal policies. Simon Heffer,
author for the Guardian even goes as far as saying that Thatcher as Prime Minister was a
“Radical visionary who rescued Britain”.125 Many critics of her economic policy bring forth
the number of jobs that were lost while Thatcher was in office, as businesses were
privatised, the economy deregulated and the power of the unions greatly reduced. An
article in the New Statesman, for example, states the belief that Thatcher is “still guilty after
all these years“ for bringing about reforms that lead to many societies in cities that were
affected by job cuts being „destroyed“.
The economic indicators during the Thatcher era also allow for different conclusions.
Unemployment numbers, for example, rose sharply in the early 1980s, rising from 1.1 million
in 1979, to a peak level of more than 3 million or 12 per cent of the working population in
1984. Afterwards, the levels started to decline slowly, being at 1.6 million in April 1990, 6
months before the end of Thatcher’s time as Prime Minister.126 127 128 129 The GDP
124
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/1878902.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012 125
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3636207/Margaret-Thatcher-Radical-visionary-who-rescued-Britain.html - accessed on February 13, 2012 126
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4447082.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012 127
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/unemployment-rate - accessed on February 13, 2012 128
http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf80.htm - accessed on February 13, 2012 129
http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf90all.htm - accessed on February 13, 2012
24
meanwhile developed very differently: it initially sank in the years of the recession in Britain,
1980 to 1982, and then continuously grew until Thatcher resigned.130
In the end, it is up to the individual to decide whether one approves of Thatcherism or not,
depending on one’s ideology and stance on government involvement, union policy and
neoliberal politics in general. However, one thing that certainly becomes clear when
researching opinions on Thatcher’s policy is that her leadership polarises, and as stated in
the beginning of this work, only very few people who did some research on her policies stay
indifferent to what she did.
130
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4447082.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012
25
6. Abstract
Die vorliegende Fachbereichsarbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Wirtschaftspolitik Margaret
Thatchers, die von 1979 bis 1990 Premierministerin des Vereinigten Königreichs war. Nach
einer kurzen Zusammenfassung der Biografie und der Aufzählung einiger Höhepunkte ihrer
Amtszeit, die nicht ökonomischer Natur sind, wird die Situation der britischen Wirtschaft in
der Zeit vor Thatchers Amtsantritt skizziert, die unter anderem durch Probleme mit dem
Staatshaushalt und Konflikte mit den Gewerkschaften gekennzeichnet war. Der weitere Teil
der Einleitung erklärt die Bedeutung von Neoliberalismus und Monetarismus, welche
bedeutende Elemente in Thatchers Ideologie waren.
Im Hauptteil wird auf die einzelnen wirtschaftspolitischen Reformen der Politikerin und
deren Auswirkungen eingegangen. Ihre Geldmittel- und Steuerpolitik, die vor allem auf eine
Veränderung der Last von direkten auf indirekten Steuern hinauslief, sowie Thatchers
Veränderungen am Gesundheits-, Pensions- und Bildungssystem werden beschrieben. Jede
der drei letztgenannten Reformen hatte das Ziel, die Ausgaben des Staates zu senken, im
Bildungs- und Gesundheitswesen sollte außerdem mehr Konkurrenz – auch durch private
Anbieter – und Entscheidungsfreiheit erzielt werden. Im Gesundheitssystem, das in
Großbritannien unter dem Namen „National Health Service“ betrieben wird, wurde
beispielsweise ein „interner Markt“ eingeführt, um Leistungen künftig günstiger zu erhalten.
Im Kapitel über Privatisierungen und Deregulierungen in Großbritannien wird der von
Thatcher eingeschlagene Weg von einer zu großen Teilen aus verstaatlichten Betrieben
bestehenden, hin zu einer größtenteils privatisierten Wirtschaft skizziert. Im letzten
Abschnitt des Hauptteils gehe ich auf die Konflikte zwischen Margaret Thatchers Regierung
und den Gewerkschaften ein, auf die Reformen, die den Einfluss der Organisationen
schwächten und insbesondere auf den Streik der Minenarbeiter in den Jahren 1984 – 1985.
Dieser Konflikt, der als Protest gegen Schließungen von Minen begann, wurde von beiden
Seiten mit aller Härte ausgefochten und endete schließlich in einer Niederlage der
Gewerkschaft, die den Protest nach einem Jahr aufgeben musste, ohne ein Einlenken der
Arbeitgeberseite erzielt zu haben.
Im vorletzten Kapitel gehe ich der Frage nach, welche Auswirkungen Thatchers Politik auf die
ihr nachfolgenden Regierungen hatte. Die Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede des
Thatcherismus zu Tony Blairs und Gordon Browns „New Labour“ werden erläutert, bevor
schließlich auf die heutige britische Regierung unter dem konservativen Premierminister
David Cameron eingegangen wird. Bei deren Programm sind Ähnlichkeiten zu den Reformen
Margaret Thatchers vor allem in geplanten Ausschreibungen öffentlicher Dienstleistungen
an private Anbieter sowie in tief greifenden Änderungen des Gesundheitssystems, die im
Moment in England heftig debattiert werden, zu finden.
26
Im abschließenden Kapitel der Arbeit werden sowohl positive und negative Stimmen aus der
Bevölkerung als auch kritische und lobende Kommentare von Wirtschaftsjournalisten
zusammengefasst, um zu verdeutlichen, wie kontroversiell der Thatcherismus noch heute
betrachtet wird.
27
7. List of Sources
Sources used for research:
1. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp - accessed on February 3, 2012
2. http://www.biography.com/people/margaret-thatcher-9504796 - accessed on February 3, 2012
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher - accessed on February 3, 2012
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Lady - accessed on February 3, 2012
5. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/themargaretthatcheryears/1895880/Margaret-Thatcher-and-the-Falklands.html - accessed on February 3, 2012
6. http://articles.latimes.com/1990-11-28/news/mn-4907_1_john-major - accessed on February 3, 2012
7. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/sterling-devalued-imf-loan.htm -
accessed on February 10, 2012
8. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/timeline/present_timeline_noflash.shtml - accessed on February 10, 2012
9. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4553464.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012
10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation - accessed on February 10, 2012
11. http://safalra.com/other/historical-uk-inflation-price-conversion/ - accessed on February 10, 2012
12. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Contract_%28Britain%29 - accessed on February 10, 2012
13. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/22/newsid_2506000/2506715.stm -
accessed on February 10, 2012
14. http://econ.economicshelp.org/2010/02/economy-of-1970s.html - - accessed on February 10, 2012
15. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3067563.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012
16. http://safalra.com/other/historical-uk-inflation-price-conversion - accessed on February 10, 2012
17. http://www.economicshelp.org/2010/02/thatcher-revolution-1980s.html - accessed on February 10, 2012
18. http://aussieinnovation.com/content/how-neoliberal-was-margaret-thatcher - accessed on February
6, 2012
19. http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html - accessed on February 6, 2012
20. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism#French_Revolution - accessed on February 6, 2012
21. http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#PoliticalversusEconomicLiberalism - accessed on February 6, 2012
22. http://www.khbrodbeck.homepage.t-online.de/neolib.htm - accessed on February 6, 2012
28
23. http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#Neoliberalismis - accessed on February 6, 2012
24. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-keynesian-economics.htm
25. http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376 - accessed on February 6, 2012
26. http://www.globalissues.org/article/39/a-primer-on-neoliberalism#GoingbustTheGlobalFinancialCrisisShakesConfidence - accessed on February 6, 2012
27. http://www.econweb.com/MacroWelcome/monetarism/notes.html - accessed on February 9, 2012
28. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monetarism.asp#axzz1lv65TBRl - accessed on February 9, 2012
29. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/389146/monetarism - accessed on February 9, 2012
30. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monetarism.asp#axzz1lv65TBRl - accessed on February 6, 2012
31. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/the-legend-of-margaret-thatcher/ - accessed on February 8, 2012
32. http://www.zum.de/whkmla/sp/changhyun/ThatcherPolicies4.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
33. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_taxation_in_the_United_Kingdom#20th_century - accessed on February 8, 2012
34. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/111449 - accessed on February 8, 2012
35. http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/income-tax - accessed on February 8, 2012
36. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rates_%28tax%29#United_Kingdom - accessed on February 8, 2012
37. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/14/newsid_2495000/2495911.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012
38. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Charge - accessed on February 8, 2012
39. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8593158.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012
40. http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/your_money/tax_index_ew/council_tax.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012
41. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_Tax - accessed on February 8, 2012
42. http://www.bized.co.uk/current/mind/2003_4/170504.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012
43. http://econ.economicshelp.org/2010/02/thatcher-revolution-1980s.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
44. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Lawson#In_government - accessed on February 8, 2012
45. http://politics.beasts.org/scripts/celebrity?celebid=546327666 - accessed on February 8, 2012
46. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_%28England%29 - accessed on February 8, 2012
29
47. http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/about/Pages/overview.aspx - accessed on February 8, 2012
48. http://www.springermedizin.at/artikel/1738-grossbritannien-holt-im-gesundheitswesen-auf - accessed on February 8, 2012
49. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/saco/pdf/101_en.pdf - accessed on February 8, 2012
50. http://www.hsj.co.uk/resource-centre/best-practice/the-griffiths-report-25-years-on/5001481.article - accessed on February 8, 2012
51. http://www.healthp.org/node/71 - accessed on February 8, 2012
52. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_and_Community_Care_Act_1990 - accessed on February 8, 2012
53. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/background_briefings/your_nhs/85952.stm - accessed on February 8, 2012
54. http://www.nhs.uk/Tools/Documents/HistoryNHS.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
55. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_National_Health_Service_%28England%29#Development_of_the_NHS_.28England.29_and_NHS_Wales_since_1970 - accessed on February 8, 2012
56. http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/about/Pages/nhscoreprinciples.aspx - accessed on February 8, 2012
57. http://www.watsonwyatt.com/render.asp?id=10187&catid=2 - accessed on February 8, 2012
58. http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/finkelstein_speech.htm - accessed on February 8, 2012
59. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Earnings-Related_Pension_Scheme - accessed on February 8, 2012
60. http://gegenstandpunkt.com/english/UK-social-reforms.html - accessed on February 8, 2012
61. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/history/chapter08.html - accessed on February 10, 2012
62. http://www.earlhamsociologypages.co.uk/conthatnewright.html#New_Right - accessed on February 10, 2012
63. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_school#United_Kingdom - accessed on February 10, 2012
64. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_Technology_College - accessed on February 10, 2012
65. http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/younglevin.html - accessed on February 10, 2012
66. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant-maintained_school - accessed on February 10, 2012
67. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Curriculum_%28England,_Wales_and_Northern_Ireland%29 - accessed on February 10, 2012
68. http://www.insidegovernment.co.uk/children/reform-curriculum/ - accessed on February 15, 2012
69. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premiership_of_Margaret_Thatcher#Domestic_criticism - accessed on February 10, 2012
30
70. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/29/newsid_2506000/2506019.stm - accessed on February 10, 2012
71. http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/mcintyre/papers/LHCE/uk-higher-education.html - accessed on February 10, 2012
72. http://www.answers.com/topic/thatcherism-2 - accessed on February 1, 2012
73. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3636207/Margaret -Thatcher-Radical-visionary-who-rescued-Britain.html - accessed on February 1, 2012
74. http://www.privatizationbarometer.net/atlas.php?id=9&mn=PM - accessed on February 1, 2012
75. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2000/nov/22/thatcher.politics1- accessed on February 1, 2012
76. http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf80.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012
77. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/51ccaa1c-20c2-11e1-816d-00144feabdc0.html - accessed on February 1, 2012
78. http://www.libertystory.net/LSUNFORGETTHATCHER.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012
79. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4061613.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012
80. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Act_1985 - accessed on February 1, 2012
81. http://www.gasarchive.org/privatisation1.htm - accessed on February 1, 2012
82. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2001/mar/20/5 - accessed on February 1, 2012
83. http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Big+Bang- accessed on February 1, 2012
84. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Stock_Exchange#.22Big_Bang.22- accessed on February 1, 2012
85. http://wiki.uiowa.edu/display/06e169/The+Big+Bang- accessed on February 1, 2012
86. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher#Domestic_affairs- accessed on February 1, 2012
87. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatisation_of_London_bus_services- accessed on February 1, 2012
88. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2001/mar/20/5 - accessed on February 1, 2012
89. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Attlee#Nationalisation - accessed on February 1, 2012
90. http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/what-we-can-learn-from-margaret-thatcher - accessed on February 1, 2012
91. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Gas_plc - accessed on February 1, 2012
92. Stewart Morris, ‘Did the Thatcher governments change Britain?’
93. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/3067563.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012
94. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/49/part/II/1991-02-01?timeline=true&view=plain -
accessed on February 1, 2012
95. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/42/enacted?view=plain - accessed on February 1, 2012
31
96. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1982/46/enacted?view=plain - accessed on February 1, 2012
97. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Act_1982 - accessed on February 1, 2012
98. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/picketing.html - accessed on February 1, 2012
99. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/TradeUnions/DG_10027549 - accessed on February 1, 2012
100. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picketing_%28protest%29 - accessed on February 1, 2012
101. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3494024.stm - accessed on February 1, 2012
102. http://archiveshub.ac.uk/features/mar04.shtml - accessed on February 1, 2012
103. http://www.wcml.org.uk/timeline/1984/ - accessed on February 1, 2012
104. http://www.unionhistory.info/timeline/1960_2000_Narr_Display_2.php?Where=NarTitle+contains+%27The+1984-85+Miners+Strike%27 - accessed on February 1, 2012
105. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_miners%27_strike_%281984%E2%80%931985%29#The_formal_end - accessed on February 1, 2012
106. http://www.politicalbiography.co.uk/margaret-thatcher-biography/28-margaret-thatcher-and-the-trade-unions.html - accessed on February 1, 2012
107. Bob Jessop, ‘From Thatcherism to New Labour: Neo-Liberalism, Workfarism, and Labour Market Regulation’ published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University at: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc131rj.pdf
108. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Major - accessed on February 12, 2012
109. http://osb.revues.org/717 - accessed on February 12, 2012
110. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatisation_of_British_Rail - accessed on February 15, 2012
111. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_way_%28centrism%29 - accessed on February 12, 2012
112. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/458626.stm - accessed on February 12, 2012
113. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/thatcherism_01.shtml - accessed on February 12, 2012
114. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/themargaretthatcheryears/1895878/Margaret-Thatcher-inspiration-to-New-Labour.html - accessed on February 12, 2012
115. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/jul2010/came-j20.shtml - accessed on February 12, 2012
116. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Society - accessed on February 12, 2012
117. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12520491 - accessed on February 12, 2012
118. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alexsingleton/100076991/is-david-cameron-reinventing-himself-as-a-thatcherite/ - accessed on February 12, 2012
119. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHS_strategic_health_authority - accessed on February 12, 2012
32
120. http://www.nhsconfed.org/Networks/PrimaryCareTrust/AboutThePrimaryCareTrustNetwork/Pages/About-the-Priamary-Care-Trust.aspx - accessed on February 12, 2012
121. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_and_Social_Care_Bill_2011 - accessed on February 12, 2012
122. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16632291 - accessed on February 12, 2012
123. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/feb/12/nhs-bill-toxic-conservatives-lansley - accessed on February 12, 2012
124. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/1878902.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012
125. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/features/3636207/Margaret-Thatcher-Radical-visionary-who-rescued-Britain.html - accessed on February 13, 2012
126. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4447082.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012
127. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/unemployment-rate - accessed on February 13, 2012
128. http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf80.htm - accessed on February 13, 2012
129. http://www.bized.co.uk/dataserv/chron/kf90all.htm - accessed on February 13, 2012
130. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/4447082.stm - accessed on February 13, 2012
Image source (front page):
1. http://aprnonline.com/?p=88266 - accessed at February 14, 2012
33
8. Work Log
May 2011: Decision to write FBA, some initial research
August-September 2011: Collection of sources, finalisation of the exact topic, creation of
bullet points of the paper’s content
December 2011: Work on introduction, research on privatisation and Margaret Thatcher’s
relationship with unions
January 2012: research on Thatcher’s ideology, tax and monetary policy and her reforms of
the British educational system and the National Health Service
January 15, 2012: Completion of the first draft of the chapter on unions
January 31, 2012: Completion of the first draft of the chapter on privatisation and
deregulation
February 2012: Completion of remaining chapters on Thatcher’s policy and ideology,
research on Thatcher’s impact on British politics today
February 12, 2012: Completion of chapter on Thatcher’s impact on British politics today
February 13, 2012: Creation of preface and conclusion
February 14 - 15, 2012: Final corrections
top related