stephen friend norwegian academy of science and letters 2011-11-02

Post on 25-Dec-2014

397 Views

Category:

Health & Medicine

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Stephen Friend, Nov 2, 2011. Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo, Norway

TRANSCRIPT

Future of Genetics in Medicine

Stephen Friend MD PhD

Sage Bionetworks (Non-Profit Organization) Seattle/ Beijing/ Amsterdam

The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo November 2, 2011

Why not use data intensive science to build models of disease

Current Reward Structures

Organizational Structures and Tools

Pilots

Opportunities

Alzheimers Diabetes

Autism Cancer Treating Symptoms v.s. Modifying Diseases

Will it work for me?

7

The Current Pharma Model is Broken:

•  In 2010, the pharmaceutical industry spent ~$100B for R&D

•  Half of the 2010 R&D spend ($50B) covered pre-PH III activities

•  Half of the pre-PH III costs ($25B) were for program targets that at least one other pharmaceutical company was actively pursuing

•  Only 8% of pharma company small molecule PCCs make it to PH III

•  In 2010, only 21 new medical entities were approved by FDA

7

What is the problem?

•  Regulatory hurdles too high? •  Low hanging fruit picked? •  Companies not large enough to execute on strategy? •  Internal research costs too high? •  Clinical trials in developed countries too expensive?

In fact, all are true but none is the real problem

What is the problem?

We need a better understand disease biology before testing proprietary compounds on sick patients

What is the problem?

Most approved therapies assumed indications represent homogenous populations

Our existing disease models often assume pathway knowledge sufficient to infer correct therapies

Personalized Medicine 101: Capturing Single bases pair mutations = ID of responders

Reality: Overlapping Pathways

The value of appropriate representations/ maps

Equipment capable of generating massive amounts of data

“Data Intensive” Science- Fourth Scientific Paradigm

Open Information System

IT Interoperability

Host evolving computational models in a “Compute Space”

WHY NOT USE“DATA INTENSIVE” SCIENCE

TO BUILD BETTER DISEASE MAPS?

what will it take to understand disease?

DNA RNA PROTEIN (dark ma>er)

MOVING BEYOND ALTERED COMPONENT LISTS

2002 Can one build a “causal” model?

trait

How is genomic data used to understand biology?

“Standard” GWAS Approaches Profiling Approaches

“Integrated” Genetics Approaches

Genome scale profiling provide correlates of disease   Many examples BUT what is cause and effect?

Identifies Causative DNA Variation but provides NO mechanism

  Provide unbiased view of molecular physiology as it

relates to disease phenotypes

  Insights on mechanism

  Provide causal relationships and allows predictions

RNA amplification Microarray hybirdization

Gene Index

Tum

ors

Tum

ors

21

Causal Inference

Constructing Co-expression Networks

Start with expression measures for ~13K genes most variant genes across 100-150 samples

Note: NOT a geneexpression heatmap

1 -0.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.1 1 0.1 0.2

-0.6 0.1 1 0.8 -0.8 0.2 0.8 1

1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4

Correla9on MatrixBrain sample

expression

1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1

2

3

4

1 2 3 4

Connec9on Matrix

1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

2

4

3

1 2 4 3

41

32

Establish a 2D correla9onmatrix for all gene pairs

Define Thresholdeg >0.6 for edge

Clustered Connec9on Matrix

Hierarchicallycluster

sets of genes for which manypairs interact (relaPve to thetotal number of pairs in thatset)

Network Module

Iden9fymodules

Constructing Bayesian Networks

Preliminary Probalistic Models- Rosetta- Eric Schadt

Gene symbol Gene name Variance of OFPM explained by gene expression*

Mouse model

Source

Zfp90 Zinc finger protein 90 68% tg Constructed using BAC transgenics Gas7 Growth arrest specific 7 68% tg Constructed using BAC transgenics Gpx3 Glutathione peroxidase 3 61% tg Provided by Prof. Oleg

Mirochnitchenko (University of Medicine and Dentistry at New Jersey, NJ) [12]

Lactb Lactamase beta 52% tg Constructed using BAC transgenics Me1 Malic enzyme 1 52% ko Naturally occurring KO Gyk Glycerol kinase 46% ko Provided by Dr. Katrina Dipple

(UCLA) [13] Lpl Lipoprotein lipase 46% ko Provided by Dr. Ira Goldberg

(Columbia University, NY) [11] C3ar1 Complement component

3a receptor 1 46% ko Purchased from Deltagen, CA

Tgfbr2 Transforming growth factor beta receptor 2

39% ko Purchased from Deltagen, CA

Networks facilitate direct identification of genes that are

causal for disease Evolutionarily tolerated weak spots

Nat Genet (2005) 205:370

Map compound signatures to disease networks

Sub-­‐networkcontains genesassociatedwith toxici5es

Sub-­‐network contains genesassociated with diabetes traits

Sub-­‐network contains genesassociated with obesity traits

1

2

3

Compound 1: Drug signature significantly enriched in subnetwork associated with diabetes traits

Compound 2: Drug signature significantly enriched in subnetwork associated with obesity traits

Compound 3: Drug signature significantly enriched in subnetwork associated with obesity traits BUT also in subnetwork associated with toxicities

Compound Gene expression signatures

Tissue Disease Networks

"Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man." Nature. (2003)

"Variations in DNA elucidate molecular networks that cause disease." Nature. (2008)

"Genetics of gene expression and its effect on disease." Nature. (2008)

"Validation of candidate causal genes for obesity that affect..." Nat Genet. (2009) ….. Plus 10 additional papers in Genome Research, PLoS Genetics, PLoS Comp.Biology, etc

"Identification of pathways for atherosclerosis." Circ Res. (2007)

"Mapping the genetic architecture of gene expression in human liver." PLoS Biol. (2008)

…… Plus 5 additional papers in Genome Res., Genomics, Mamm.Genome

"Integrating genotypic and expression data …for bone traits…" Nat Genet. (2005)

“..approach to identify candidate genes regulating BMD…" J Bone Miner Res. (2009)

"An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations ...” Nat Genet. (2005)

"Increasing the power to detect causal associations… “PLoS Comput Biol. (2007)

"Integrating large-scale functional genomic data ..." Nat Genet. (2008)

…… Plus 3 additional papers in PLoS Genet., BMC Genet.

Metabolic Disease

CVD

Bone

Methods

Extensive Publications now Substantiating Scientific Approach Probabilistic Causal Bionetwork Models

• >80 Publications from Rosetta Genetics

  50 network papers   http://sagebase.org/research/resources.php

List of Influential Papers in Network Modeling

(Eric Schadt)

Equipment capable of generating massive amounts of data A-

“Data Intensive” Science- Fourth Scientific Paradigm Score Card for Medical Sciences

Open Information System D-

IT Interoperability D

Host evolving computational models in a “Compute Space F

“hunter gathers”- not sharing

TENURE FEUDAL STATES

Clinical/genomic data are accessible but minimally usable

Little incentive to annotate and curate data for other scientists to use

Mathematical models of disease are not built to be

reproduced or versioned by others

Assumption that genetic alterations in human conditions should be owned

Publication Bias- Where can we find the (negative) clinical data?

Sage Mission

Sagebase.org

Data Repository

Discovery Platform

Building Disease Maps

Commons Pilots

Sage Bionetworks is a non-profit organization with a vision to create a “commons” where integrative bionetworks are evolved by

contributor scientists with a shared vision to accelerate the elimination of human disease

Sage Bionetworks Collaborators

  Pharma Partners   Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Johnson &Johnson

38

  Foundations   Kauffman CHDI, Gates Foundation

  Government   NIH, LSDF

  Academic   Levy (Framingham)   Rosengren (Lund)   Krauss (CHORI)

  Federation   Ideker, Califarno, Butte, Schadt

RULES GOVERN

PLAT

FORM

NEW

MAP

S NEW MAPS

Disease Map and Tool Users- ( Scientists, Industry, Foundations, Regulators...)

PLATFORM Sage Platform and Infrastructure Builders-

( Academic Biotech and Industry IT Partners...)

PILOTS= PROJECTS FOR COMMONS Data Sharing Commons Pilots-

(Federation, CCSB, Inspire2Live....)

NEW TOOLS Data Tool and Disease Map Generators- (Global coherent data sets, Cytoscape,

Clinical Trialists, Industrial Trialists, CROs…)

RULES AND GOVERNANCE Data Sharing Barrier Breakers-

(Patients Advocates, Governance and Policy Makers,  Funders...)

Sage Datasets- 49+

40

Sage Neuro Collaborations

41

Neurodegenerative

• Huntington’s Disease : Marcy MacDonald/Jim Gusella (MGH) •  $2.5M Grant to CHDI to fund generation of RNA-seq data for brain regions and peripheral tissues for well phenotyped cohorts (also methyl genome studies)

•  HD/AD/PD : MacDonald/Gusella (MGH), Myers (BU), Paulsen (Iowa) •  $6.8M RC4 grant to NIH to fund generation of SNP and RNA-seq data for brain regions from HD, AD, PD for well phenotyped cohorts

•  Alzheimer’s Disease: Green (BU), Johnson (UWM) •  Collaboration opportunity around longitudinal neuroimaging & cognitive phenotyped cohorts (ADNI, ADGC, etc). Intersect gene expression studies. Funding for further data generation

Psychiatric •  Autism/ Schizophrenia- Consortium

Sleep & Stress •  Genetics of Sleep: Turek (Northwestern)

•  Collaboration with Turek lab & Merck focused on mouse. DARPA •  Enabling Stress Resistance

•  DARPA-funded collaboration with Turek lab to look at genetic and brain molecular mechanisms that regulate physical and emotional stress responses in mouse •  Currently looking to expand to human

Alzheimer’s  Disease  

•  Cross-­‐Pssue  coexpression  networks  for  both  normal  and  AD  brains  

–  prefrontal  cortex,  cerebellum,  visual  cortex  

•  DifferenPal  network  analysis  on  AD  and  normal  networks  

•  Integrate  coexpression  networks  and  Bayesian  networks  to  idenPfy  key  regulators  for  the  modules  associated  with  AD    

42  

nerve ensheathment

Glutathione transferaseGain connecPvity by 91 fold

Lose connecPvity by 40%

Module ConnecPvity Change (AD/Normal)

IdenPficaPon of Disease (AD) Pathways via ComparaPveGene Network Analysis

40,000 genes from three Pssues

Bayesian Subnetworks

Control(PFC, CB, VC)

AD(PFC, CB, VC)

43

44   44  

DifferenPally  Connected  Modules  in  AD  

• Unfolded  protein  response  (UPR)    • AKT    HIF1    VEGF  

• Olfactory  receptor  acPvity  • Sensory  percepPon  of  smell  chemical  sPmulus  

• Inflammatory  Response  

• Extra  cellular  matrix  (ECM)  

• SynapPc  transmission  (suppressed)  

• Nerve  ensheathment  

44  

Key RegulatorsPECAM1: Platelet-­‐endothelial celladhesion molecule, a tyrosinephosphatase acPvator that plays arole in the platelet acPvaPon,increased expression correlateswith MS, Crohn disease, chronic B-­‐cell leukemia, rheumatoid arthriPs,and ulceraPve coliPs

ENPP2: Phosphodiesterase I alpha,a lysophospholipase that acts inchemotaxis, phosphaPdic acidbiosynthesis, regulates apoptosisand PKB signaling; aberrantexpression is associated withAlzheimer type demenPa, majordepressive disorder, and variouscancers

SLC22A25: solute carrier family 22,member 25, Protein with highsimilarity to mouse Slc22a19, whichis a renal steroid sulfate transporterthat plays a role in the uptake ofestrone sulfate, member of thesugar (and other) transporter familyand the major facilitatorsuperfamily

Glutathione Transferase Module (Pink)

•  983 probes from all three brain regions (9% from CB, 15% from PFC and 76% from VC)•  Most predicPve of Braak severity score

GlutathioneTransferase NerveEnsheathment ExtracellularMatrix

45

Why not share clinical /genomic data and model building in the ways currently used by the software industry (power of tracking workflows and versioning

Leveraging Existing Technologies

Taverna

Addama

tranSMART

INTEROPERABILITY  

INTEROPERABILITY

Genome Pattern CYTOSCAPE tranSMART I2B2

SYNAPSE  

Watch What I Do, Not What I Say Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Most of the People You Need to Work with Don’t Work with You

My Other Computer is Amazon

sage bionetworks synapse project

CTCAPArch2POCMThe FederaPonPortable Legal ConsentSage Congress ProjectAshoka/Sage MedXChange

Six Pilots at Sage Bionetworks

RULES GOVERN

PLAT

FORM

NEW

MAP

S

Clinical Trial Comparator Arm Partnership “CTCAP” Strategic Opportunities For Regulatory Science

Leadership and Action

FDA September 27, 2011

CTCAP

Clinical Trial Comparator Arm Partnership (CTCAP)

  Description: Collate, Annotate, Curate and Host Clinical Trial Data with Genomic Information from the Comparator Arms of Industry and Foundation Sponsored Clinical Trials: Building a Site for Sharing Data and Models to evolve better Disease Maps.

  Public-Private Partnership of leading pharmaceutical companies, clinical trial groups and researchers.

  Neutral Conveners: Sage Bionetworks and Genetic Alliance [nonprofits].

  Initiative to share existing trial data (molecular and clinical) from non-proprietary comparator and placebo arms to create powerful new tool for drug development.

Started Sept 2010

Arch2POCM

Restructuring the PrecompePPveSpace for Drug Discovery

How to potenPally De-­‐RiskHigh-­‐Risk TherapeuPc Areas

The FederaPon

2008   2009   2010   2011  

How can we accelerate the pace of scientific discovery?

Ways to move beyond “traditional” collaborations?

Intra-lab vs Inter-lab Communication

Colrain/ Industrial PPPs Academic Unions

human aging: predicting bioage using whole blood methylation

!

!!!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

40

60

80

10

0

Training Cohort: San Diego (n=170)

Chronological Age

Bio

log

ica

l A

ge

RMSE=3.35

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

! !

!!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

40 50 60 70 80 90

40

60

80

10

0

Validation Cohort: Utah (n=123)

Chronological Age

Bio

log

ica

l A

ge

RMSE=5.44

•  Independent training (n=170) and validation (n=123) Caucasian cohorts •  450k Illumina methylation array •  Exom sequencing •  Clinical phenotypes: Type II diabetes, BMI, gender…

sage federation: model of biological age

Faster Aging

Slower Aging

Clinical Association -  Gender -  BMI -  Disease Genotype Association Gene Pathway Expression Pr

edictedAge

(liverexpression

)

Chronological Age (years)

Age Differential

Reproducible  science==shareable  science  

Sweave: combines programmatic analysis with narrative

Sweave.Friedrich Leisch. Sweave: Dynamic generation of statistical reports using literate data analysis. In Wolfgang Härdle and Bernd Rönz,editors, Compstat 2002 –

Proceedings in Computational Statistics,pages 575-580. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002. ISBN 3-7908-1517-9

Dynamic generation of statistical reports using literate data analysis

Federated  Aging  Project  :    Combining  analysis  +  narraPve    

=Sweave Vignette Sage Lab

Califano Lab Ideker Lab

Shared  Data  Repository  

JIRA:  Source  code  repository  &  wiki  

R code + narrative

PDF(plots + text + code snippets)

Data objects

HTML

Submitted Paper

Portable Legal Consent

(AcPvaPng PaPents)

John Wilbanks

Sage Congress ProjectApril 20 2012

RAParkinson’sAsthma

(Responders CompePPons)

Ashoka/Sage

MedXChange

Why not use data intensive science to build models of disease

Current Reward Structures

Organizational Structures and Tools

Six Pilots

Opportunities

IMPACT ON PATIENTS

IMPACT ON PATIENTS

IMPACT ON PATIENTS

top related