stanford center on longevity - student design challenge 2014-15 webinar deck

Post on 23-Jan-2015

85 Views

Category:

Business

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Stanford Center on Longevity - Design Challenge 2014-15 Webinar Deck. Discussion of the new Student Design Challenge, in collaboration with Aging2.0

TRANSCRIPT

2014-2015 Student Design Challenge In collaboration with Aging2.0

Informational WebinarAugust 27th 2014 9am PT

1

Agenda

2

9-9:10 Welcome by Aging 2.0:Questions: Hangout / #movedesign / @Aging20

9:10-9:15 Introductions and Moderation Stephen Johnston and Michelle Maalouf, Aging 2.0

9:15- 9:35 Overview and History/Last year's Challenge Ken Smith and Lauren Grieco, Stanford Center on Longevity

9:35- 9:50 Q and A SessionOpen to web viewers

9:50 - 9:55 Wrap UpMore Info Sources to visithttp://longevity3.stanford.edu/designchallenge2015/

Aging2.0 is a global innovation network with a mission to connect, educate and support innovators in aging and

long-term care

DRIVING NEXT GENERATION INNOVATION

3

Startups Industry

Investors

Older adults

Summit

We are building a new innovation ecosystem

Challenges / Showcases

Blog / Content

Global Chapters

4

5

Some mobility challenges for older adults

• How to encourage and support personal mobility? – Exercise is an important part of health & wellness goals,

but most older adults don’t get enough– Muscle mass correlates to longevity (UCLA, 2014) –

challenges around rehabilitation and home physiotherapy

– Only 11% of wearable fitness devices sold to 50+• How to improve mobility around the home and

in the community? – 90% of people want to ‘age in place’ (AARP)– 2/3 of older adults in USA don’t have access to public

transport– Isolation and loneliness increases risk of death by 40%

(UCSF)

6

Some products already in market:Stylish and fashionable walking sticks and canes

7

Some products already in market:Exoskeletons and support systems

8

Some products already in market:Gait analysis, golf swings, 3D visual imagery

Clockwise from top: Walkjoy, V1 Golf App, Micosoft Kinect app

9

Some products already in market:Super-powered wheelchairs, convertible wheelchairs

Clockwise from top: Firefly, Agile Life Personal Transportation System, Kenguru, Dodge Minivan

10

Some products already in market:Social journeys, transport apps, age-friendly cities

Clockwise from top: Lyft Line, Age Friendly Cities, Google Maps

Stan fo rd Cen te r on Longev i ty Web ina rAugus t 27 , 2014

What does it mean to live twice as long as your ancestors?

Percentage of the United States Population Over the Age of 65

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 2030

30Median age 40

65+

15-64

0-14

37

U.S.

158 million 318 million 370 million1950 2010 2030

2035 – More old people than children

• Age mix, millions

15-64

<15

65+

China and India

• China

1950 2010 2030

65+

15-64

<15

2434

41

Median age

0.54 billion 1.35 billion 1.46 billion

65+

15-64

<15

21 2532

Median age

0.37 billion 1.21 billion 1.48 million

India

75 is the new 68: Today’s 75-year-old man faces the same mortality risk as a 68-year-old man in 1970.

• Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, 2005.

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 205040

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

50

59

63

68

7578

Mortality risk reaches 1%

Mortality risk reaches 4%

A 75-year-old man today has the same risk of dying as a 68-year-old man in 1970.

Has our culture kept up with our longevity gains?

The Stanford Center on LongevityRe-Designing Long Life

“To the extent that people arrive at old age mentally sharp, physically fit

and financially secure, individuals and societies will thrive.”

Laura L. Carstensen, PhDDirector, Stanford Center on Longevity

Thomas A. Rando, MD, PhDDeputy Director, Stanford Center on Longevity

140+ Faculty Affiliates

• Mind

• Mobility

• Financial Security

Mobility Division Working PrincipleCompression of Morbidity

Qu

alit

y o

f Life

Age

Desired

PR

EV

EN

TIO

N

INTER

VE

NTIO

N

AC

CO

MO

DATIO

N

HistoricallyTypical

Stanford Center on Longevity Design ChallengeIn collaboration with Aging 2.0

Why a design challenge for students?

What do we expect to get from it?

What do we hope design teams get? - Prizes - Exposure - Connections

21

“Maximizing Independence for those with Cognitive Impairment”

• Launched with sponsorship from the New Retirement Forum• In collaboration with Aging 2.0• $10K first prize, $5K 2nd, $2K 3rd

• 52 entries, 31 universities, 15 countries• 7 Finalists • Finals in person at Stanford April 10th

Last Year

22

1

3

1

11 1

1

5

1

1

1

1

1

61

1

1

2

2

4

16 2

1

1

1

1

1

1

12-4-13

52 Entries Total

2 Indicates the # of entries from a single university

2013-2014 SCL Design Challenge EntriesIn collaboration with Aging 2.0

Platinum: New Retirement ForumGold: Brookdale / Institute for Optimal Aging, Direct Supply, EskatonSilver: Home Instead, Silverado, Benchmark Senior Living, Home Care Assistancez

Thanks to our Sponsors:

Educational / Marketing Partners: Alzheimer’s Association, Caring.com, OnLok Lifeways, Front Porch, AgeTech West, Family Caregivers Alliance. Tech Sponsor: Skild.

23

1st Place: EATWELL

Sha YaoAcademy of Art Institute (San Francisco)

2nd Place: Taste

Keio-NUS CUTE Center National University of Singapore

3rd Place: Memory Maps

Ritika MathurCopenhagen Institute of Interaction Design

THE WINNERS:

2014-2015 Stanford Center on Longevity Design Challenge

Goals:1. Create well-designed, practical solutions that address key issues associated

with aging2. Encourage a new generation of students to become knowledgeable about

aging issues 3. Provide promising designers with a path to drive change in the world Year 2 Overview The 2014-2015 Challenge focuses on solutions to empower mobility among older adults at a personal level by: Reducing sedentary lifestyles Encouraging and enabling physical movement and exercise Reducing barriers to mobility in the home and in the community New Developments• Involvement of President’s Council on Fitness, Sports, and Nutrition• World Economic Forum Engagement

Judging Criteria

• Effectiveness – 40%

• Originality – 30%

• Positive Impact – 20%

• Cost Effectiveness – 10%

“Enabling Mobility Across the Life Span”

Challenge Timeline

Early Communications

KickoffSept 23rd

Summer 2014 Fall 2014 Winter 2015 Spring 2015

Phase I Design

Phase IDesigns

Due Dec 5 Finalists

Announced

FinalsApril 9th

Mentoring

QUESTIONS?Websi te:ht tp : / / l ongev i ty3 . s tan fo rd .edu /des igncha l l enge2015

/Or : http://bit.ly/movedesign  

Facebook :h t tps : / /www. facebook .com/Redes ignLongL i f e

Twitter:#movedes ign

top related