soybean irrigation management · •available in apple and android platforms •figure how well...

1

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Soybean Irrigation Management

Daran Rudnick-Extension SpecialistChuck Burr and Troy Ingram -Nebraska Extension Educators

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Importance of Irrigation

Source: Rudnick and Irmak (2015)

2

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Periods When

Crops are Most

Susceptible to

Water Stress

[a]Pollination period very critical if no prior water stress.

Source: Doorenbos and Pruitt (1977)

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Yields by

Irrigation

Strategy

http://extensionpublications

.unl.edu/assets/html/g1367

/build/g1367.htm

3

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Monsanto Water

Utilization

Learning Center

2010

Corn

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Monsanto Water

Utilization

Learning Center

2010

Soybeans

4

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Average Soybean Yield and Irrigation Water Use Efficiency for all sites in 2015

Treatment SoybeanYieldbu/ac

Irrigationinches

Irrigation Water Use Efficiencybu/inch

Full Irrigation 81.7 3.0 0.1

75% Irrigation 80.2 1.9 -0.6

50% Early,Full After R3 83.6 1.3 1.8

Rainfed 81.3 0.0

Average Rainfall 17.1 inches

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Concepts for Managing Irrigation with Soil Water Sensors

5

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Soil Water

Diagram for

Irrigation

Scheduling

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Indirect methods measure a surrogate property and relate it to soil water content or potential.

• Some Indirect methods

– Hand Feel

– Neutron Attenuation

– Capacitance

– Time Domain Reflectometry

– Frequency Domain Reflectometry

– Electrical Resistance

– TensiometersEstimated

Soil Water Status

Measure Variable

“Surrogate”

Relationship

(a.k.a. Conversion)

6

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Campbell Scientific CS616

SWC

Campbell Scientific CS655

SWC, Temp, & EC

MPS-2 or MPS-6 5TE EC-5

SWP & Temp SWC, Temp, & EC SWC

---------- Decagon Devices ----------

Stevens Hydra Probe II

SWC, Temp, & EC

Acclima True TDR

SWC, Temp, & EC

Irrometer Watermark

SWP

Irrometer Tensiometer

SWP

ETgage (Atmometer)

Reference ET

Legend:

SWP: Soil Water Potential

SWC: Soil Water Content

Temp: Soil Temperature

EC: Bulk Electrical Conductivity

7

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Electrical Resistance Sensors

Description:

•Relatively low cost & easy to use/install

•Reports “tension” not “water content”

•Requires good soil contact

•Some issues with high sandy soils at high tensions or

swelling clays

•Minor Temperature effects

•Tension decreases by 1% for each 1ᵒF increase above

70ᵒF & vice versa

•Response Time (potential lag)

•Hysteresis Effects (i.e., wetting and drying curves are

not the same)

Gypsum BlocksWatermark

8

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Tensiometers

Description:

•Operational range: 0 to ~85 cb

•Within irrigation range for sandy soils

•Not within irrigation range for fine-textured soils

•Potential limitation on depth of install

•Reports “tension” not “water content”

•Requires good soil contact

•Response Time (potential lag)

•Hysteresis Effects (i.e., wetting and drying curves are not

the same)

•Routine maintenance

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Capacitance Sensors in Access Tubes

Description:

•Based on dielectric properties of soil

•Capacitors can often be placed at various

depths within access tube

•Continuous monitoring capabilities

•Fast response time

•Susceptible to various factors: soil type and

structure, temperature, wetting patterns, soil

salinity, air gaps, clay content, among others

•Proper installation is essential

•Measurement frequency impacts the sensing

volume

9

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

•Field evaluation is necessary to determine

how well the sensors will perform under

dynamic in-season conditions.

•Laboratory evaluation using site specific soils

can help identify the accuracy and precision of

the sensors.

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Laboratory Sensor

Comparison

10

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Select

Sensor

• Convenience

• Financial Cost

• Remote Access

• Sensor Accuracy

• Product Support

• Soil Type & Condition

• How Many are Needed

• Crop Type and Rooting Depth

• Integration with Other Sensors

Pros vs Cons

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

11

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Crop Water App• Free App• Available for Apple/Android• Provides an easy way to estimate soil

water status• Will estimate water used/water

available• Log readings over time

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

CropWater• Calculate average reading down to 4 feet

• Water depleted in inches/foot

• Calculate water depleted in soil profile

• Also displays total water available

12

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

CropWater

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

IrrigatePump• Cost - $3.99• Available in Apple and Android platforms

• Figure how well your pumping plants on your irrigation wells stack up against the Nebraska Pumping plat Criteria (NPC)

• Should be a reasonable target for every new pumping plant

13

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

IrrigatePumpResults:

• Click on the “Calculate” button to figure your performance rating

• Figures potential savings if you could bring the unit up to NPC standard

• Also figures payback years

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

MeterCalc

• Acre inches pumped displayed

• Inches per acre displayed

• Total inches pumped during season

• Tracks annual allocations

14

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Soywater:- Launched on May1, 2010- Irrigation management tool- Developed by UNL & Nebraska Soybean Board

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Soywater on Cropwatch

15

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Login page

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Soywater inputs

16

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Output table

– Input rainfall

– Input irrigation

• Soil water depletion

• Predict growth Stages

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Water use chart

17

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

• Watermark sensor calculator

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Nelson Senninger

Regulators Function the Same

18

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Pressure Regulator Tester

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Pressure Regulator Tester

19

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Thank You!

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

acres

20

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

21

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

http://water.unl.edu/cropswater/nawmn

22

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

https://nawmn.unl.edu/

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln

23

© 2016 University of Nebraska–Lincoln