shoreline use and perceptions survey report
Post on 02-Jun-2018
222 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
1/35
Shawn Dalton, Ph.D.
Principal and Senior Consultant
Thrive Consulting, Inc.
July 23, 2012
SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS
SURVEY REPORT
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
2/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
3/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................2
Methods And Limitations Of Study .........................................................................................................................2
Findings .......................................................................................................................................................................3
Discussion And Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................10
Appendix A: Survey Instrument ...........................................................................................................................12
Appendix B: Photographs Of Shoreline Types ....................................................................................................12
Appendix C: Summary Of Survey Results ............................................................................................................12
Appendix D: Geographic Distribution Of Respondents Recreational Activities...........................................12
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During the summer of 2012 the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project (HRSSP) administered asurvey of Hudson River shoreline users, to determine whether shoreline users prefer a tidy, homogenousshore zone, to one hosting wrack and woody debris; and to learn how river users perceive and value theshoreline. The survey was administered to both a group of anglers and a group of kayakers, and askedquestions about general use of the Hudson River, as well as specific preference and use questions about aset of seven photographs showing different types of shoreline along the Hudson. Findings indicate awide variety of aesthetic preferences among shoreline users. Respondents in general have a strong senseof the ecological value of different types of shorelines, but do not necessarily connect that with opportuni-
ties to allow their own land management practices to improve the health of the river system.
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
4/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 2
INTRODUCTION
During the summer of 2012, Thrive Consulting worked with representatives of the Hudson River Sus-tainable Shorelines Project (HRSSP) to design and administer a survey of Hudson River shoreline users.The goals of this exercise were to determine whether shoreline users prefer a tidy, homogenous shore
zone, to one hosting wrack and woody debris; and to learn how river users perceive and value the shore-line.
The purpose of the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project is to provide science-based informationabout the best shoreline management options for preserving important natural functions of the HudsonRiver Estuarys shore zone, especially as sea level rise accelerates and storms increase in intensity. Theproject is generating new information about engineering performance, economic costs, projected riverconditions, legal and regulatory opportunities, and the needs and priorities of key audiences. To date,project team members have carried out numerous research activities including studies of shoreline treat-ment impact on river ecology, public perception of shorelines, climate change and sea level rise adapta-tion, and ecological costs and benefits of shoreline treatments. All of these, among others, are improvingthe teams ability to disseminate information to decision makers on shoreline changes.
The Project to date has carried out a number of activities and research projects related to this theme, in-cluding a study of the relative ecological costs and benefits of different shoreline management designs,and a series of interviews of experts and consultants to determine whether and how climate change andsea level rise are currently incorporated into their shoreline designs.
Here, we present the results of a survey administered to both a group of anglers and a group of kayakers,which asked questions about general use of the Hudson River, as well as specific questions about a set ofphotographs showing different types of shoreline along the Hudson. The anglers participate in an an-glers diary program through the NYSDEC Hudson River Fisheries Unit. The kayakers have participatedin meet-ups and other paddling events through the Hudson River Greenway. In each case, program par-ticipants were sent emails by the coordinators, to request their participation in this survey.
METHODS AND LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
A subgroup of the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines team worked with Thrive Consulting to bothdevelop and test the survey instrument, and to take photographs of particular types of shoreline to beused as samples in the survey instrument. The survey instrument was developed and tested in late
June/early July, 2012. The survey was developed using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool (the surveyinstrument is provided in Appendix A). SurveyMonkey does not provide the function of inserting imag-es into the online survey, so a second document was generated, which showed photographs of seven dif-ferent shoreline types (see Appendix B). These were provided on a single cover page, followed by a full-page image of each shoreline type. Thus, respondents were able to quickly review and compare the pho-tos on the single page, and were also able to refer to the full-page images for more detail if necessary,while taking the online survey.
The survey went live on SurveyMonkey on July 6, 2012. An email requesting respondents to fill out thesurvey was sent to 125 anglers and 135 kayakers, for a potential sample size of 260 respondents. The sur-vey was closed on July 20, 2012 at which point 127 people had filled it out, a response rate of 48.8%. Inseveral cases, the respondents skipped one or several questions. In this document, we report on thecounts for each question, not for the overall survey respondent community. For details on the number ofresponses to each question, see Appendix C, the summary of the survey results downloaded from
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
5/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 3
SurveyMonkey. This shows how many responses there were to each question. Note that this small sur-vey represents the results provided by a small user community, and the results presented here cannot beconstrued as being statistically representative of either the angling and kayaking communities of theHudson River, nor the larger user community.
FINDINGS
General Summary
The respondents to the survey are very familiar with the Hudson River: 67% of them have spent 20 ormore years recreating along and in it, while 30% have spent between 5 and 19 years along the Hudson.Only 3% of respondents have spent less than 5 years recreating along the river. The geographic distribu-tion of recreational activities along the Hudson River is quite broad, with respondents citing over 50 dif-ferent locations for their activities (see Appendix D for details).
In their opinion, during the generally long time frame of experience of the Hudson, most respondentsthink that its overall health has improved (86.9%), while 11.1% think it has stayed the same, and 2% thinkits health has diminished. A majority (57%) of the respondents think that the Hudson River is somewhathealthy, 35% think it is healthy, 7% think its health is poor and 1% think it is very healthy.
Shoreline Uses
Respondents were asked about their activities and the frequency with which they engage in them alongthe Hudson River. Over 60% of respondents spend time along the river relaxing, viewing the scenery,and picnicking; 53.5% engage in more active pursuits such as hiking, walking their dog or birdwatching;57.5% canoe, kayak, or row along the river; and 68.5% of respondents fish in the river (29.1% from land,and 39.4% from a boat). The activity in which respondents most commonly engage (35.8%) is canoeing,kayaking, or rowing, and those who engage in this activity largely do so quite frequently: 52.8% paddleor row once a week or more. While >42% of respondents do not fish the river 20.8% fish it from land or a
dock and 32.3% from a motor boat (see Figure 1). The most common reason for fishing where they dowas spatial proximity to their residence (30%); other reasons for fishing site selection included abundanceof fish (27.8%), easy access from land (25.6%), or easy access from the water (18.9%).
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
6/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 4
Figure 1. Activities
People recreate along the Hudson for a variety of reasons: to have fun (78.2%), to relax (71.8%), to spendtime with friends or family (60.5%), to get away (33.1%), to learn about the river (32.3%), etc. Open-endedresponses to this question included such answers as for exercise, windsurfing, aesthetic enjoyment, creat-ing art, and cultural tourism.
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
7/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 5
Figure 2. Prevalent Activity
Figure 3. Frequency
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
8/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 6
Shoreline Preferences
Over 90% of respondents indicated that is it very important to them that the Hudson River provide ahealthy place for animals, fish and plants to live and find food and shelter, while 7% said this was mod-erately important, 1% said it was slightly important, and none said that it was not important at all.
When asked which shoreline type improved, diminished, or had no effect on the health of the river, a
substantial proportion of respondents indicated that each type had some benefit to the health of the sys-tem, but 87.5% said wetlands, 69.1% said rocky shore, 63.2% said bedrock, and 44.2% said rip-rap im-prove health. Fewer respondents overall indicated that they thought any of the shoreline types diminishhealth but most prominent among them were the 47.4% who thought that bulkheads, 34.7% cribbing, and33.7% landscaped shorelines diminish the health of the river.
Respondents generally preferred the aesthetics of natural shoreline types 58.8% found wetlands, 58.3%rocky shore, and 60.4% bedrock very attractive. Landscaped shorelines were also considered very attrac-tive by 57.0% of respondents. Bulkhead and cribbing were considered not at all attractive by 57% and35.1% of respondents respectively.
Figure 4. Aesthetic Values of Shoreline Types
Interestingly, however, 67.1% of respondents indicated that they would use a landscaped shoreline fortheir front- or backyard, while 69.8% would relax and enjoy the scenery and 58.1% would canoe, kayak,or row from a landscaped shoreline. The best shoreline type for all activities other than fishing was con-sidered to be a landscaped shore, whereas a rocky shore was considered to be the best shoreline type forfishing from both land and from a boat. Despite these strong opinions about the best sites for differentactivities, there is a wide distribution of what activities people would undertake from all the different
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
9/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 7
shoreline types, ranging from a low of 2.2% using a wetland to fish from land, to a high of 69.8% relaxingand viewing scenery or picnicking from a landscaped shoreline.
Figure 5. Activities On Different Shorelines
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
10/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 8
Figure 6. Best Shoreline Type for Activity
Respondent Demographics
The vast majority of respondents to this survey were white (>97%), (non-Hispanic (>97%), affluent(>65%), males (>79%), ranging in age from 19 to 79, with an average age of 56.5 years. They were well-educated, virtually all having completed high school and >41% having obtained a graduate degree; andlargely from Ulster (20%), Dutchess (15%), or Albany (14%) County. One respondent lived outside of theUnited States, and 7 respondents lived outside of New York State. Over 50% of the respondents do notsee the Hudson River during their commute to work, while 40.4% see it by car and 8.1% see it by trainduring their commute. Most respondents (83.8%) do not work in a job along the Hudson River that de-pends upon proximity to the water, while 16.2% do.
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
11/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
12/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 1
Figure 9. Place of Residence
D I S C U S S I O N A N D C O N C L U S I O N
As stated at the outset of this document, this small sample of particular Hudson River users cannot beconstrued as representative of the general population. However, if this small sample is in any way indic-ative of recreational activity and use value of the Hudson River and its shoreline, we can conclude that itis well-loved, thoroughly explored, and valued for multiple uses. These range from passive recreationalactivities such as relaxing and enjoying the scenery to more active pastimes such as paddling, windsurf-ing and hiking. People engage in these activities quite regularly, in many cases once a week or more, anddo so for a variety of reasons, including spending time with friends and family, or alone; to have fun; tolearn and share information about the river and so on.
However, there may be some disconnection between the values placed on the river, and peoples willing-ness to manage their own property to reflect those values. For example, while 87% of respondents be-lieve that wetlands improve the ecological health of the river, only 24.7% indicated that they would usethis shoreline type as their front- or backyard.
This finding bears further investigation in a place where some 1,000,000 people live within one mile of theHudson River individual landowners may not recognize the contribution, either positive or negative,that their land management practices make to the health of the Hudson River. In addition, it would beworthwhile to administer this survey to a much broader audience, both to begin to generate statisticallysignificant results, and to determine whether there are similarities and differences in terms of uses andpreferences of various demographic, socioeconomic, or ethnic subgroups.
The goals of this study were to determine whether shoreline users prefer a tidy, homogenous shore zone,to one hosting wrack and woody debris; and to learn how river users perceive and value the shoreline.
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
13/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 11
We have to some extent met both of these goals, although further research would expand our under-standing of wider user groups preferences, perceptions, and values of the shoreline. We have begun todetect a wide variety of aesthetic preferences: several different types of shorelines were considered to bevery attractive by users bedrock, wetlands, rocky shores, and landscape shorelines were rated as veryattractive by 60.4%, 56.8%, 58.3%, and 57.9% of respondents, respectively. The two small subgroups ofriver users studied here in general have a strong sense of the ecological value of different types of shore-
lines, but do not necessarily connect that with opportunities to allow their own land management prac-tices to improve the health of the river system. More research is required to determine whether this ap-parent disconnect is actually present, and to determine whether these findings would also be apparentamong a broader audience. This would increase our overall understanding of how people in the regionperceive the shoreline and use it and the River, and would improve our ability to inform the activitiesand next steps of the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project in regards to public outreach and en-gagement.
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
14/35
Shorelines Use and Perceptions Survey Report for the Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Page 12
APPENDIX A: SURVEY INSTRUMENT
APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF SHORELINE TYPES
APPENDIX C: SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS
APPENDIX D: GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF RESPOND
ENTS RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
15/35
Page 1
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
Dear Hudson River User:
Thank you for taking the time to fill out this survey. The Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project wants to know how you use and think about
the Hudson shoreline. Your input will help us with a research project on the Hudson River.
During this survey, you will be asked to examine several photographs. These can be found attached in a separate pdf file, and can also be found at
the following website (PLEASE ATTEMPT TO REFRESH THE SITE ON YOUR BROWSER IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ACCESS):
http://hrnerr.org/public/training/ShorelinesUserSurveyPhotos.pdf
YOU CAN RETURN TO COMPLETE OR REVISE YOUR SURVEY AT ANY TIME, PLEASE MAKE SURE TO USE THE SAME COMPUTER. Your
responses will remain anonymous.
We appreciate your contribution to this effort. If you have questions please contact Emilie Hauser at eehauser@gw.dec.state.ny.us
Sincerely,
Hudson River Sustainable Shorelines Project Team
1. Which of the following activities do you undertake in or along the Hudson River? (Check
all that apply)
FISHING FROM LAND
FISHING FROM A BOAT
CANOEING, KAYAKING, ROWING
HIKING/WALKING/DOG-WALKING/BIRD-WATCHING
RELAXING/VIEWING SCENERY/PICNICKING
Other (please specify)
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
16/35
Page 2
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
2. Which activity do you undertake most frequently? (Check one only)
3. How often do you do the most frequent activity?
4. For what reasons do you do the most frequent activity? (Check all that apply)
FISHING FROM LAND
FISHING FROM A BOAT
CANOEING, KAYAKING, ROWING
POWER BOATING / SAILING
HIKING/WALKING/DOG-WALKING
BIRD-WATCHING
RELAXING/VIEWING SCENERY/PICNICKING
Other (please specify)
ONCE A WEEK OR MORE
TWO OR THREE TIMES A MONTH
ABOUT ONCE A MONTH
LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH
TO HAVE FUN
TO RELAX
TO BE ALONE
TO SPEND TIME WITH FRIENDS OR FAMILY
TO GET AWAY
TO LEARN ABOUT THE HUDSON RIVER
TO LEARN ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT/WILDLIFE
TO TEACH MY CHILDREN ABOUT THE HUDSON RIVER
Other (please specify)
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
17/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
18/35
Page 4
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
7. Please examine the photographs attached in the survey email or access them online at
http://hrnerr.org/public/training/ShorelinesUserSurveyPhotos.pdf
For each activity that you do, which is the best shoreline type?
8. We would like to know how attractive you think each shoreline type is, regardless of
your use of it.
Please tell us how attractive you find the shoreline type in each photograph.
A. CRIBBING B. WETLAND C. RIP-RAP D. BULKHEADE. ROCKY
SHORE F. BEDROCK
G.
LANDSCAPEDSHORE
I DO NOT DO
THISACTIVITY
FISHING FROM LAND
FISHING FROM A BOAT
CANOEING, KAYAKING,
ROWING
HIKING/WALKING/DOG-
WALKING/BIRD-
WATCHING
RELAXING/VIEWING
SCENERY/PICNICKING
I WOULD USE THIS
SHORELINE TYPE AS MY
FRONT OR BACK YARD
NOT AT ALL ATTRACTIVE SOMEWHAT ATTRACTIVE FAIRLY ATTRACTIVE VERY ATTRACTIVE
A. CRIBBING
B. WETLAND
C. RIP-RAP
D. BULKHEAD
E. ROCKY SHORE
F. BEDROCK
G. LANDSCAPED SHORE
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
19/35
Page 5
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
9. Do you think each shoreline type shown in the photos improves, diminishes, or has no
effect on the health of the Hudson River?
10. If you fish along the Hudson River, from where do you access the fishing most often?
11. If you fish along the Hudson River, why do you use the site you go to most often?
(Check all that apply)
12. Do you see the Hudson River along your commute (by car or train)?
IMPROVES HEALTH DIMINISHES HEALTH NO EFFECT ON HEALTH
A. CRIBBING
B. WETLAND
C. RIP-RAP
D. BULKHEAD
E. ROCKY SHORE
F. BEDROCK
G. LANDSCAPED SHORE
FROM LAND/DOCK
FROM A MOTOR BOAT
FROM A CANOE OR KAYAK
I DO NOT FISH ALONG THE HUDSON
THERE ARE LOTS OF FISH AT THE SITE
IT S EASY TO GET THERE FROM THE WATER
IT S EASY TO GET THERE FROM THE LAND
IT S HARD TO GET THERE
IT S CLOSE TO MY HOUSE
I DO NOT FISH ALONG THE HUDSON
Other (please specify)
YES, BY CAR
YES, BY TRAIN
NO
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
20/35
Page 6
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
13. Do you work along the Hudson River in a job that depends on proximity to the water
(e.g. marina, dock, pilot, tourism)?
14. About how long have you been spending time along the Hudson River?
15. How important is it to you that the Hudson provide a healthy place for animals, fish and
plants to live and findfood and shelter?
16. In general, what do you think of the health of the Hudson River?
17. In the time that you've been familiar with the Hudson River, do you think its health has:
The following questions were modified from United States Census questions.
YES
NO
OVER 30 YEARS
20-29 YEARS
10-19 YEARS
5-9 YEARS
LESS THAN 5 YEARS
NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL
SLIGHTLY IMPORTANT
MODERATELY IMPORTANT
VERY IMPORTANT
VERY HEALTHY
HEALTHY
SOMEWHAT HEALTHY
POOR HEALTH
IMPROVED
STAYED THE SAME
DIMINSHED
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
21/35
Page 7
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
18. Are you male or female?
19. In what year were you born?
20. What is the highest level of school you have completed or the highest degree you have
received?
21. What is your current household income?
22. Please specify your ethnicity.
Male
Female
NO FORMAL EDUCATION
SOME GRADE SCHOOL
COMPLETED GRADE SCHOOL
SOME HIGH SCHOOL
COMPLETED HIGH SCHOOL
SOME COLLEGE
COMPLETED COLLEGE
SOME GRADUATE WORK
A GRADUATE DEGREE
Less than $10,000
$10,000-$19,999
$20,000-$39,999
$40,000-$59,999
$60,000-$79,999
$80,000-$99,999
$100,000 or more
HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
22/35
Page 8
Shorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception SurveyShorelines User Perception Survey
23. Please specify your race.
24. Where do you live?
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
ASIAN
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
ALBANY COUNTY
COLUMBIA COUNTY
DUTCHESS COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
ORANGE COUNTY
PUTNAM COUNTY
RENSSENAER COUNTY
ROCKLAND COUNTY
ULSTER COUNTY
WESTCHESTER COUNTY
NEW YORK CITY
OTHER COUNTY IN NEW YORK
STATE OTHER THAN NEW YORK STATE
OTHER COUNTRY
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
23/35
A. Cribbing B. Wetland
C. Riprap D. Bulkhead
E. Rocky shore F. Bedrock
For more detail, see fullsize images on
the following pages.
G.
Landscaped shore
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
24/35
Appendix C:Summary of Survey Results
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
25/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
26/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
27/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
28/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
29/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
30/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
31/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
32/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
33/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
34/35
-
8/11/2019 SHORELINE USE AND PERCEPTIONS SURVEY REPORT
35/35
Appendix D GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES
ounty or Region Municipality
Location
Number
HudsonREstuary-All 5
Northernstretch 6
Albany Bethlehem BethlehemTownPark 1
Albany Albany CorningPreserve 2
Albany Bethlehem HenryHudsonPark 13Albany Albany 1
Albany,Rensselaer
Capitaldistrictboat
launches 1
Rensselaer Rensselaer
SchodackIslandState
Park 1
Rensselaer Castleton 1
Greene NewBaltimore 1
Greene Coxsackie 1
Columbia Germantown 1
Columbia,Greene Hudson,Athens 1
Middlestretch 9
Ulster Saugerties Arrowfield 2
Ulster Ulster CharlesRiderPark 2Ulster Highland CSXProperty 1
Ulster Saugerties
EsopusCkandHudson
River 3
Ulster PortEwen GeorgeFreerPark 2
Ulster Kingston KingstonLighthouse 1
Ulster Kingston KingstonPointPark 1
Ulster Saugerties MaldenMiniPark 1
Ulster Kingston
PortEwenBeach,
LighthousePark,Ryder
Park 1
Ulster Connelly RondoutCreek 1
Ulster Kingston RondoutCreek 2
Ulster Saugerties SaugertiesLighthouse 4
Ulster Kingston 2
Dutchess Beacon LongDockBeacon 1
Dutchess Staatsburg NorriePointStatePark 1
Dutchess Poughkeepsie QuietCovePark 2
Dutchess Tivoli 2
Dutchess Rhinecliff 1
Dutchess WappingersFalls 1Middletosouth 7
Orange NewWindsor PlumPoint 2
Orange CornwallonHudson 1
Orange Newburgh 7
Putnam ColdSpring 3
Putnam ManitouMarsh 1
Rockland BearMountatin BearMountain 2
Rockland Piermont 1
Westchester Peekskill AnnsvilleCreek 3
Westchester Croton CrotonPointPark 3
Westchester Nyack NyackBeachStatePark 1
Westchester Peekskill PeekskillLanding 1
Westchester Ossining WesterlyMarina 1
Westchester Verplanck 1Croton Bay Haverstraw
top related