scenario analysis for china’s energy and major industry ... · scenario analysis for china’s...
Post on 13-Mar-2020
7 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Scenario Analysis for China’sEnergy and Major Industry Sectors
Tsinghua University, ChinaCenter for Clean Air Policy
Dialogue on Future International Actions to Address Global Climate Change
Lima, 12th October, 2005
2
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Sector Analysis and results• Implications of Intensity Targets• Conclusions and Discussions• Appendix
2
3
China’s national energy profile
• Energy demand keeps growing.• Decline of energy demand after middle of 1990s mainly results from
shift of economic structure and enhancement of energy efficiency.• Energy intensity declined all along since 1980s. The amount of energy
consumption has only doubled while China’s gross domestic product (GDP) has quadrupled from 1980-2000.
China's Energy Demand/Energy Intensity
0250500750
100012501500
19851987
19891991
19931995
19971999
2001
Year
Mtce
0
2
4
6
8
Mtce
/Billi
on U
S. $
energy demand energy intensity
Data resource:China Statistical Yearbook 2002
4
China’s national emissions profile• China’s CO2 emissions increase year
by year, so does China’s share of the world fossil fuel CO2 emissions. China ranks the second emitter all over the world. However, per capita emission level is low.
• In 2002, China’s per capita emission of CO2 is only 2.71tCO2, much lower than the world average level of 3.96tCO2.
• China’s CO2 emissions mainly come from combustion of coal. Emissions from natural gas and petroleum account for a relatively small proportion.
• Structure of CO2 emissions is approximately consistent with the structure of primary energy consumption.
Historial CO2 Emission of China
0.0200.0400.0600.0800.0
1,000.01,200.0
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
CO2 E
miss
ion (M
t-CO2
)
Solid Liquid Gas Cement Total
Data resource: CDIAC,2003
Total Fossil Fuel CO2 EmissionsWorld's Countries Ranked by 2002
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
USAChina
RussiaIndiaJapn
GermanyUK
CanadaKorea
ItalyMex icoFrance
IranAustrilia
South AfricaMtCO2
3
5
Background information on sectors
1.67%7.86%4.25%9.95%8.56%*Share of China’s total energy consumption (2000)
256.65*/1249
Electricity
50.19416.55138.77322.58CO2 Emission (MtCO2)(2000)
Pulp &PaperCementSynthetic AmmoniaIron &SteelTarget Sectors
Data resource: China Statistical Yearbook 2002 ; CCAP,Sector-Based Greenhouse Gas Reduction P
Structure of China's CO2 Emission in 2000
43%
9%
28%
7%
13%0%
Electricity & Heat Industrial Processes Manufacturing & Construction Transportation Other Fuel Combustion International Bunkers
Paper,Pulp:1.54%Synthetic Ammonia:4.25%
Cement:12..404%Iron&Steel:9.88
*Taking no account of the electric supply to other sectors
China's Sectoral CO2 Emissions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Electricity Iron&Steel SystheticAmmonia
Cement Pulp andPaper
share of world share of top 10 developing countries emitters
6
Electricity Sector Characters
• Coal-fired power plants still accounts for the majority of electric power supply.• China has the most abundant hydropower resources in the world, with an estimated potential of 380 gigawatts. Hydropower theoretically could supply much of China’s needs, but suitable rivers are located far from load centers and are heavily laden with silt.
. Data Resource: China Statistical Yearbook 2002; ERI, China’s Sustainable Energy Scenarios 2020
Development of China's Electric Power System
050
100150200250300350400
1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 Year
Instal
led C
apac
ity(G
W)
02004006008001000120014001600
Powe
r Gen
eratio
n(TW
h)
Installed Capacity(GW) Power Generation (TWh)
China's Electric Power Generation Structure(2000)1% 0%
2%
76%
18%3%
coal gas oilhydropower nuclear renewables
4
7
100%
-
0.12%
0.66%
24.8%
74.4%
Share of Total
Capacity
-5�15%---1.46 --Renewables
100%1249.11638.4319367.4Total
-10�20%20�30--0.5 375.2 530* (1998)Wind
-25�35%40--16.7 210011 Nuclear
-60�80%50--243.134 79352.2 1209Hydro
0.76 50�60%2.5%31.24 41.1 Oil
0.47 40�58%1.03%12.8627.368 Gas
1.16 35�45%
30
96.5%1205 1038.1
237540 3634
Coal
Average CO2intensity �Mt-
CO2/TWh)
Average efficiency
Average age
�year�
share of total CO2 emissions
CO2emission(Mt)
Generation(TWh)
Capacity (MW)
number of plants (or generator
units
Fuel
Distribution of plants by Fuel in 2000
8
Distribution of coal-fired plants�>6MW� by CO2 intensity in 2000*
32.2 408.33 420.96 76563233<1.05
1220.62
280.96
231.01
300.32
AnnualCO2 (MtCO2)
95.75%
22.0
18.0
23.55
CO2 (% share of sector)
1099.342850965283Total
261.58 658522921.05-1.20
187.34 557814231.20-1.30
229.46 86900 4335>1.30
Total annual generation(Twh)
Total capacity
(MW)
Total number of
plants/units
CO2 Intensity (Mt CO2/TWh)
*There is no such accurate data for this part. We can only provide rough results estimated from existing data.
20021993Year
18.1%58826.5451319.0%225831807<50
6100
513
456
248
344
26
No. of Plants
325705.7
28640.7
54405.5
51310
116923
15600
Total Capacity (MW)
16.7%20.1%23993217100-200
8.8%11.4%1353026750-100
100%100%1190862532total
15.8%27.4%32600162200-300
35.9%19.1%2278073300-600
4.8%3.0%36006>600
of Totalof TotalTotal Capacity (MW)
No. of PlantsUnit Size�MW�
Distribution of coal-fired power plants by capacity ( greater than 6MW )
5
9
Bullets for Electricity Sector• Thermal power plants (fired with coal, petroleum, or natural gas) accounted
for almost three-quarters of China’s installed capacity in 2000. Hydropower provided about 25 percent and nuclear power less than 1 percent of capacity. Oil and natural gas combined accounted for less than 6 percent of total power generation in 2000.
• Nearly all of the sector’s CO2 emissions come from coal-fired generators.
• Unlike some other countries, a significant share of China’s coal-fired generator capacity is at relatively small units. For example, nearly three out of every four such generators is less than 50 MW, and these generators account for about 20% of total electric capacity.
• Over 40 % of China’s CO2 emissions of electricity sector come from relatively inefficient coal-fired plants with CO2 intensities above 1.2 Mt/TWh.
10
Iron&Steel Sector
Data resource:Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, 2003
Development of China's Iron Production
05
101520253035
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Mt
% share of global iron production China's iron production
Development of China's Crude Steel Production
0
5
10
15
20
25
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Mt
% share of global crude steel production China's crude steel production
• Total production and proportion of both iron and steel in the world keep growing all along.
• Pig iron from blast furnace accounts for the majority of total iron. Proportion of direct reduced iron is comparatively small.
• Majority of crude steel is from oxygen blown converters(83%,2002)
6
11
Iron&Steel Sector• Higher energy intensity of per
ton steel( about 1.5 times as Japan)
• Main reasons of higher energy intensity includes: characteristic of production process ,small proportion of advanced equipment, inefficient management.
• Iron/Steel ratio of China is high , although with a decline trend
Iron/Steel Ratio of China and USA
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
China USA
Source: Japan Iron and Steel Federation*include the energy consumption of iron used as an input as well as that used to make the steel
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
100105
110120
130
150
125
International comparison of energy intensity of iron/steel industry(Index for Japan set at 100*)
Japan Korea EU15 USA ChinaRussialarge average
12
2907068setsOpen-hearth furnace
82.546.533.922.3%Continuous casting ratio
281267176<100setsContinuous casting machineContinuous casting
equipment
24.46.35.34.4tonsAverage Production Capacity per plant
49822128082976220tonsProduction Capacity
204338015611403setsNumberSteel-making electric furnace
35.824.224.223.3tonsAverage Production Capacity per plant
10070717558114911tonsProduction Capacity212297240211setsNumberSteel-
making Oxygen blown
converter
11742.841.237.9kg/tCoal injection per ton iron
611.785.394.4103.2m3Average Production Capacity per plant
147427275397141765116595m3Production Capacity
241322815021130setsNumber
Iron-making blast
furnace
2000199519931990Typical Plants in iron&steel industry
Data resource: China iron&steel statistic . Data of 2000 is only for key iron&steel enterprises
Evolution of Plants in Iron&Steel Sector
7
13
AnnualCO2 *2
(mt)
Total annual production *2
(mt)
Share of total(%)
Total production capacity per year*1 (mt)
Total numberCO2intensity(tCO2/t)
Class of equipment
18.9117.438.6014.230051.085>3000m3
46.5639.8319.6632.5275191.1692000-2999m3
252.85202.622100165.46523211.248Total*3
Blast furnaceFor iron-making 41.4134.14 16.8527.8780 311.2131000-
1999m3
128.0097.7148.2279.7893 1841.310300-999m3
16.3312.326.0810.0594701.326101-299m3
1.641.200.590.9810 121.367 <100m3
-0.05*57.754.146.7760 3-0.006>300t12.72187.20100163.6770 2450.068Total*4
oxygen blown converter for steel-making
1.6054.0628.8847.270039-0.030100-299t4.0752.9228.2746.2710600.07750-99t
7.5211.2635.9012.3900300.66850-99t7.129.7331.0110.7024910.73211-49t0.861.083.431.1830480.802<10t
4.479.3129.6710.2400130.480>100t19.9731.37010034.51541820.637Total*4
Electric furnace for steel-making
0.080.570.310.500020.142<10t7.0271.8938.4062.86001410.09811-49t
Distribution of Plants in key Iron&Steel Enterprise in 2003
*1 Incomplete statistic data for large and medium key enterprises; *2Uncertain data estimated from product capacity by the same proportion *3 By volume *4 By weight *5 negative energy consumption means energy recovery realized by advanced steel-making converter
14
Bullets for Iron&Steel Sector• Iron production is the highest energy-intensity process during iron and steel
production, and accounts for nearly 40% of China’s total CO2 emissions from iron and steel production.
• Blast furnaces between 300-999 m3 accounted for 50.62% of China’s total CO2 emissions from blast furnace in 2003. But average capacity per plant of China’s new blast furnace will above 1000m3
• The CO2 intensity of China’s largest blast furnaces (>3000 m3) is 13.06% lower than average level for all furnaces, but the largest blast furnaces account for only 8.60% of total iron production.
• In the past decade, the average production of China’s iron plants has greatly increased, rising by 617.11% from 1995 to 2000. A similar trend has occurred in steel-making, 47.9% of oxygen blown converter, 287.3% of electric furnace
8
15
Cement Sector• Total output of cement sector
increased from 65Mt in 1978 to 146Mt in 1985, and China’s cement sector ranked No.1 of the world in output statistics.
• Great demand of cement is caused by the building and rebuilding of the infrastructures and city constructions to satisfy the tremendous growth of China’s economic. So cement production keeps growing without any letup.
• Accounted for more than 40% of whole world output in 2002.
• Main sources of CO2 emission from cement sector is fossil fuel combustion, self industrial process and a relative small portion of indirect electrical consumption.
• Average clinker/cement ratio is 0.75
Data resource: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, 2003; ERI, China’s Sustainable Energy Scenarios 2020
CO2 Emissions in China's Cement Sector
0
100
200
300
400
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Year
CO2 E
miss
ions(M
t-CO2
)
Fuel Combustion Electricity-Related Process
Development of China's Cement Production
0.005.00
10.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.00
19791981
19831985 1987
19891991
19931995
19971999 2001
%
0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0600.0700.0800.0
Mt
% Share of Global Production China's Cement Production
16100%
16.58%
0.79%
0.19%
0.60%
13.91%
1.10%
83.43%
9.00%
16.21%
58.22%
Share of Producti
on
99.9
11912.34%1161Subtotal
rotary kiln
718
5.7
1.4
4.3
7.9
599
64.6
116.4
418.0
Annual Production (MT)
78.5
84.6
120.8
72.5
72.5
36.2
72.5
Unit Investme
nt ( USD/T)
shaft kiln
15
15
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
AverageAge (Year)
100%9412Total
0.20.20%19Wet-process Rotary kiln
0.32.11%199Lepol kiln
0.50.91%86kiln operated with off-kiln decomposition
--stand-tube preheating kiln
0.04
0.93%88rotary kiln with waste
heat for power generation
3.70%348rotary kiln with cyclone preheater
0.14.47%421dry process plain kiln
---Other
87.66%8251Subtotal
0.053.69%347ordinary shaft Kiln
0.183.98%7904Mechanical Shaft Kiln
average plantCapacity (MT)Share*1No. of
plants*1
Distribution of China’s Cement Plants in Clinker Production Process
*1 Data in 1995
9
17416.55
76.1
3.84
0.85
2.29
63.06
6.06
340.45
82.84
257.61
total CO2emissions(MTCO2)
748
1229
1435
1117
1896
1596
1154
Energy consumption (Mcal/T)
18.27%Subtotal
rotary kiln
0.6741
0.6085
0.5333
0.6312
0.7669
0.7117
0.6163
CO2Intensity(TCO2/T)*
3
shaft kiln
140
140
140
133
133
98
141
Electricity
consumption
(kWh/T)*2
184
139
87
156
249
218
144
Coal consumption (kgce/T))*2
2.87
2.22
1.81
2.43
3.81
3.4
2.4
Gasoline consump
tion (kg/T)*2
100%Total
0.92%Wet-process Rotary kiln
0.20%Lepol kiln
0.55%kiln operated with
off-kiln decomposition
stand-tube preheating kiln
15.14%
rotary kiln with waste heat for power
generation
rotary kiln with cyclone preheater
1.45%dry process plain kiln
81.73%Subtotal
19.89%ordinary shaft Kiln
61.84%Mechanical Shaft Kiln
Share of CO2 emissions
Parameters of China’s Cement Plants in Clinker Production Process in 2000
*2 data in 1990; *3 including the emission from self industrial process
18
Bullets for Cement Sector
• The cement industry in China is dominated by shaft kilns.
• In 2000, about 8500 shaft kilns account for almost 85% of total cement production. These plants account for over 80% of total cement CO2 emissions.
• Mechanical Shaft Kiln is the largest single source of cement CO2 emissions, accounts for 61.84% of China’s total CO2 emissions from cement.
• Rotary kilns operated with off-kiln decomposition have a very low CO2intensity, but a high unit investment, accounts for 0.6% of production and 0.5% of emissions
• China’s cement sector structure is need to be improved.
10
19
Distribution of Synthetic Ammonia Sector in 1998
Data resource: China Statistical Yearbook 2002 �ERI, China’s Sustainable Energy Scenarios 2020; Xiulian Hu, Kejun Jiang. Evaluation of Technology and Countermeasure for GHG Mitigation in China
Synthetic Ammonia SectorDevelopment of China's Systhetic Ammonia Production
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
%
0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.00
Mt
% Share of Global Production China's Systhetic Ammonia Production
•To be classified into great, medium and small ammonia enterprises. Separately, output per year of each kind of enterprise is 300 thousand tons, >40 thousand tons and <40 thousand tons
•Although the proportion of small scale enterprises declined gradually, they account for more than 50% of the total production.
•Global average proportion of product made from gas and oil is > 85%, while China’s raw materials for synthetic ammonia are mainly coal and coke.
17.1%5.4056.0%55Medium scale
55.9%17.6790.8%828Small scale
Share of no. Share of production
Total 100%31.63100%912
27.0%8.5553.2%29Large scale
Production (Mt)No.Classification of enterprises
20
Data resource: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, 2003 ; ERI, China’s Sustainable Energy Scenarios 2020
Pulp and Paper Sector.According to production structure, pulp
for paper enterprises can be classified into three categories: modern large scale plant , integrated pulp plant and other small scale plant. The proportion is separately 10%,45%,45% in 1998Pulp from wood accounts for small
proportion in paper making process.Alkali recovery rate is relatively low. Integrated energy consumption per ton
paper is about 1.5 times to advanced level of the world. Sector structure still needs to be
improved.
Development of China's Pulp and Paper Production
0.002.004.006.008.00
10.0012.0014.0016.00
19791981
19831985
19871989
19911993
19951997
19992001
%
0.00
5.00
10.0015.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Mt
% Share of Global Production China's Pulp and Paper Production
11
21
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Sector Analysis and results• Implications of Intensity Targets• Conclusions and Discussions• Appendix
22
Descriptions of Ref�PR�PN Scenarios
Will evaluate projected emissions using combination of measures in place before the end of 2030 based on PR scenario, mostly from a sustainable way
New Policy
Will evaluate projected emissions using combination of measures in place before the end of 2005.Taking regards of Report of 16th Party Congress, Tenth Five-Year Plan as well as relative industrial long term development policies and plans.
Recent Policy
Will evaluate projected emissions using the policies in place before 2000Reference
DescriptionsScenarios
12
23
Energy Demand of Scenarios
24
CO2 Emission of Scenarios
13
25
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Sector Analysis and results• Implications of Intensity Targets• Conclusions and Discussions• Appendix
26
Measures of Electricity Sector
109
8
7
6
5
4321
No. Marginal mitigation ost(U.S.Dollar/tCO2)Measures
365.2Solar thermal
210.5Wind power
105.7IGCC (integrated gasification combined-cycle )PFBC (pressurized fluidized bed combustion)
80.9Natural gas
73.2Hydropower
54.5Nuclear power
19.86Supercritical plant
10.5Reconstruction of conventional thermal power
-7.24CFBC (Circulating Fluidized bed combustion)
-15.7Demand side management
14
27
MAC Curve of Electricity Sector
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Cumulative CO2 Emission Avoided in 2020(MMT)
Aver
age
Unit
Cost(
US.$
/tCO2
)
2
1
43
876
5
10
9
28
Intensity analysis of Electricity(2020)
177.37 Billion US.dollarsInitial production cost
1.01 (MtCO2/TWh)Initial CO2 intensity
186.24181.80181.36180.92179.14177.37Production cost (billion US.dollars )
74.5455.8553.4750.7936.190Average cost per ton CO2 reduced ($/t CO2)
2.88%1.92%1.81%1.69%1.18%0.21%Decline of initial CO2 intensity
0.9810.9910.9920.9930.9981.007CO2 intensity(MtCO2/TWh)
119.0079.3274.6269.9048.918.44CO2 reduction (MtCO2)
5%2.5%2.25%2%1%0%Production cost increase (%)
2.191.090.880.43
59.74 US.dollars /per ton CO2Average cost per ton CO2 reduced overall
119.71MtCO2Total CO2 reduction achieved
0.970Cost increase ($/MWh)
7.281total cost from positive cost measures
-0.129No cost measures total saving
7.152Total cost
Incremental Cost (billion US.dollars)
Blue and green parts are analyzed based on MAC curve, have no relationship with the production cost increase rate.
15
29
Measures of Iron&Steel Sector
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
No. Marginal mitigation cost(U.S.Dollar/tCO2)Measures
333.13More advanced electric furnace for steel-making
154.57More advanced oxygen blown converter for steel-making
133.54Apply direct reduced iron-making process
88.43More advanced direct steel rolling machine
80.20More advanced sinter machine
76.98Apply dry coke quenching
20.76Adjust ratio of iron/steel
13.58More advanced blast furnace with TRT
7.67More advanced coke oven
-9.04Establish energy management center and increase management capacity
-34.19More advanced continuous casting machine
-90.10Increase coal power injection level
30
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
CO2 Emission Avoided ,2020(MMT)
Aver
age
Uni
t Cos
t(U.S
.Dol
lar/t
CO
2)
1
2
4
87
65
3
9
1011
12
MAC Curve of Iron&Steel Sector
16
31
Intensity analysis of Iron&Steel(2020)
152.47 Billion US.dollarsInitial production cost
1.608 (tCO2/ t steel)Initial CO2 intensity
160.09156.28155.90155.52153.99152.47Production cost (billion US.dollars )
78.0760.5157.1153.7931.970Average cost per ton CO2 reduced ($/t CO2)
16.81%*10.88%*10.37%9.79%8.21%0.84%Decline of initial CO2 intensity
1.3381.4331.4411.4511.4761.594CO2 intensity(tCO2/t steel)
97.61*62.97*60.0656.7047.544.87CO2 reduction (MtCO2)
5%*2.5%*2.25%2%1%0%Production cost increase proportion (%)
21.1710.588.474.22
57.11 US.dollars /per ton CO2Average cost per ton CO2 reduced overall
60.06MtCO2Total CO2 reduction achieved
9.530Cost increase per production($/t steel)
3.605total cost from positive cost measures
-0.182No cost measures total saving
3.423Total cost
Incremental Cost (billion US.dollars)
*in scenario analysis, total incremental cost only accounts for 2.25% of total production cost,so the data is estimatedBlue and green parts are analyzed based on MAC curve, have no relationship with the production cost increase rate.
32
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Sector Analysis and results• Implications of Intensity Targets• Conclusions and Discussions• Appendix
17
33
Conclusions
• Tremendous society transformation in current China vs. Challenge to analyzer
• Relative lower-level technologies vs. continuous technology advancement and energy efficiency improvement
• Recent policy scenario vs. New policy scenario
• Carbon emission potential vs. Incremental cost
34
Constraints and Prospects
• Potential constraints and difficulties – Financing– Technology availability– Plant characteristics and disparities– Geographic/regional problems or differences– Ownership pattern– Capacity building
• New international financial institutions • Technology transfer mechanism
– Identification of prior technologies– R&D– Pilot projects– Capacity building: envision of technology strategy, innovation of
technology management system, training for operators
18
35
Discussions
• What is the actual GHG emission reduction potential?• What is the actual cost for GHG emission reduction?
– Emission reduction potential maybe is higher in analysis, because in scenario analysis, we only change the technology structure to reflect the technology substitution, but in real world, there are many constraints not including in model .
– Incremental cost of emission reduction cost maybe is lower because while analyzing technology substitution ,the most determinant is the compare of marginal cost of different technology and “sinking cost” has not been considered.
– Model results uncertainties• Sources:
– Scenario definition– Methodology– Data resource
• Impact on output– Emission reduction potential– Cost– Feasibility
36
Future work
• More sectors in our framework• Integration of Top-down and Bottom-up
methodologies: macroeconomic models for the analysis of the macroeconomic impacts by sector-based options
19
37
Any question, please contact
Environmental Systems Analysis Institute.Department of Environmental Science and Engineering.Tsinghua University. Beijing 100084,P.R.China
Dr. WANG CanE-mail:canwang@tsinghua.edu.cnPhone: (8610)62785610-17
Mr. WANG KeE-mail:wangke02@mails.tsinghua.edu.cnPhone:(8610)62794115
Ms. ZHANG YingE-mail:becky-zhang@mails.tsinghua.edu.cnPhone:(8610)62794115
38
Our Works on Climate Change• Sector-based mitigation options analysis• Top-down economic impact analysis: such as
CGE model• Combination of adaptation measures and
regional sustainable development strategy: such as water resources
• CDM: Market potential analysis, preparation of PDD and methodologies training for related stakeholders
• Initial research on integrated assessment model
20
39
Thank you
40
Presentation Outline
• Overview• Sector Analysis and results• Implications of Intensity Targets• Conclusions and Discussions• Appendix
21
41
GDP�Billion Dollar�
5.5%6.5%7.5%Annual growth ratio7142.094181.19 3095.7 2227.44 1551.5317 1080.7 GDP�billion dollar�
203020202015201020052000year
02000400060008000
100001200014000
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040Year
China's Energy Scenarios 2020(ERI,2003) SRES A1SRES B1 SRES B2National Response Strategy (ADB/Tsinghua,1994) Issues and Options (WB/Jt Study Group,1994)Environmental Considerations (UNEP/NEPA/ERI/Qinghua,1996) ALGAS(GEF/UNDP/ADB/ SSTC,1998)Country Study (USDOE/SSTC/Tsinghua,1999) actualCCAP project
42
Population�Billion�
1.521.451.401.351.311.267Population�Billion�
4.4‰6.5‰7‰Annual growth ratio
68.153.247.9642.9438.8936.1�Urbanization ratio���
203020202015201020052000year
11.21.41.61.8
22.2
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040year
China's Energy Scenarios 2020(ERI 2003) SRES A1 SRES B1
SRES B2 National Response Strategy(ADB/Tsinghua,1994) Issues and Options(WB/Jt Study Group,1994)
Environmental Considerations (UNEP/NEPA/ERI/Tsinghua,1996) ALGAS(GEF/UNDP/ADB/ SSTC,1998) China Country Study(USDOE/SSTC/Qinghua,1999)
Actual CCAP project
22
43
Analytical methodology Technology data: energy intensity,
emission intensity, cost etc.
Marginal emission reduction cost of different measures
Energy demand and emission under different scenarios
Other Scenario force-driving: Social, economic, political etc.
Emission reduction potential of each measure and intensity analysis
Macro-economic cost and impact of sector-based option
Integration of macroeconomic model:CGE
Conclusion and policy suggestions
Ongoing Work
44
Analytical methodology continuedAccounting approach -- LEAP model (Long Range Energy Alternatives Planning System )
Baselinescenario
Abatementscenario
Total demand
Technology
SectorTechnology
structure
Unit CO2emission
Coefficient ofEnergy
Consumption
Unit cost
Productionvia
technology
Cost curve
Energy demand
Emission curve
Abatementcurve
23
45
46
Coke Making
Quenching
Sintering
Blast furnace Direct reduced
iron-making Coal Power Injection
Oxygen Blown Converter Electric
Casting
Hot Rolling
Cool Rolling
Production Process during iron&steel Sector
24
47
• Oxygen blown converters vs. electric furnace: – although oxygen blown converters are much less CO2-intensive,but they need
pig iron as raw .Iron-making is high energy intensity process. The raw material of electric furnace is waste steel, it can make crude steel from waste steel and only needs few iron. So the total energy intensity is lower than oxygen blown converter.
– In scenario analysis, the share of crude steel made from electric furnace is important.. We often use the ratio of iron/steel to indirectly describe the proportion of electric furnace steel.
– But in China, waste steel is scarce because China is still facing tremendous development, the total stock of steel in current China is smaller. Electricity availability is another constraint.
– In future years, when the steel stock in China is large, there is more waste steel availability, the share of electric furnace in steel making will increase.
• In iron-making process, direct reduced iron-making is another important kind of technology.– It can make iron directly from iron ore and coal and skip the process of coke-
making. It is also high energy-intensity process. So when using the technology of direct reduced iron-making ,the total energy intensity is lower than traditional blast furnace iron-making, that also means the decrease of total energy consumption of steel making. But this kind of technology is expensive and the total production can't satisfy the raw material demand of China's steel making.
– In medium and long term analysis, direct reduced iron-making will play an important role in energy conservation and emission reduction in China's iron&steel industry.
Instructions for Iron&Steel Process
top related