psy sem2 pj
Post on 05-Dec-2014
110 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Hong Kong Community College
CCN2189 Developmental psychology CASE STUDY
Name Student ID
Lam Yeuk To,Victor 13454999A
Lee Sing Ho,Ben 13519714A
Lok Hiu Fung,Kelvin
13511311A
Lui Chun Wing,Luke
13031390A
Tong Yuen Chak,Lado
13581313A
Wong Ka Hei,Jerry 13571670A
A Biography of Chan Kung
Content● Background of Mr. Chan ● Lifetime of Mr. Chan ● Critical Events● Conclusion● Reflection● Reference● Q&A
Background of Chan KungAge: 79 years old (born in 1935)
-IDCard 1938
Sex: Male
place of Birth: Hong Kong
marital status: Married -2 Boys 4 Girls
place of residence: Kwan Fong(Now)
Lifetime of Mr. Chan
Now
Birth(1935)
Dropout of school(1942)
Marriage(1959)
Work[$40-$50/per month](1959-1962)
Have Lung Disease(1973)
Being Coolie(container terminal)Traffic accident
(1975)
Retirement(1985)
Critical Events
Drop out of school
•Erickson’s stage Theory (Identity vs. Role Confusion)
•Marcia theory identity achievement
•Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Context of Development
Marriage
• Erickson’s stage Theory(Intimacy vs. isolation stage)
• Levinson’s Life structure
• Social role theory
Retirement
•Bandura learning model
•Erickson’s stage theory (integrity vs despair)
•Ativity theory
•The successful aging
1ST CRITICAL EVENT DROPOUT OF SCHOOL
Time line
Now
Birth(1935)
Dropout of school(1942)
Marriage(1959)
Work[$40-$50/per month](1959-1962)
Have Lung Disease(1973)
Being Coolie(container terminal)Traffic accident
(1975)
Retirement(1985)
BackgroundCritical Event : Dropout of school
Mr. Chan father died in early
Mr. Chan stepfather take drug
His mother always gameble
Background Critical Event : Dropout of school
When Mr. Chan was 13 years old, he dropped out of school and began his career life.
2 factors of Dropout of school : 1 ) Economic factor
- His parents had problem of taking
drugs
Mr.Chan had no tutorial fees.
2 ) Learning ability factor
- Mr.Chan had a poor academic
result
Mr.Chan thought he could not study
well.
Integrity vs. Despair
Generativity vs. Stagnation
Intimacy vs. Isolation
Identity vs. role confuse
Industry vs. inferiority
Autonomy vs shame & doubt
Initiative vs Guilt
Trust vs mistrust
Erikson’s stage Theory
Industry
Before the stage:
Erikson’s stage Theory- Identity vs. Role Confusion stage
Identity is a sense of self-continuity❏ understanding of one’s unique traits across age & social
roles
Identity formation1.Crisis- period of decision-making when old values and choices
are reexamined 2.Commitment- follow some specific role, value, goal, or
ideology
Erikson’s stage Theory- Identity vs. Role Confusion stage
When Mr.Kung became an adolescence, he…..
- understood his ability of studying
- to be the "breadwinner" in family
- believe “effort is better than knowledge”
Marcia theory identity achievement
Definition :
-Follow of Erikson’s idea
- two key parts: a crisis and a commitment
4 different paten of identity
- Identity Diffusion
-Identity Foreclosure
-Identity Moratorium
- Identity Achievement
Marcia theory identity achievement
breadwinner:
Crisis
• knew he was not good at study
• BUT “breadwinner” was given BY PARENTS, SOCIETY
• NOT consider enough
Commitment
• value• money is most
important• goal
• fulfill physiological need(survive) I.E food, water
Marcia theory identity achievement
breadwinner:
crisis
Commitment
directly accept the identity
Foreclosure
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Context of Development
❏ Explains development in terms of relationships between people and their environment
Immediate Context(Family)
Macrosystem Cultural Context(Beliefs and Values)
Exosystem Socioeconomic Context (Government Institutions)
Mesosystem(Microsystem)
Person Biological Context
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Context of Development
Macrosystem Exosystem
The 1950s Japanese-Occupied PeriodBelief:
❏ More family members=More income
Importance of Work>Study
❏ Less School❏ Expensive tuition fees❏ No supporting welfare
Weak Education System
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Context of Development
Microsystem Mesosystem
Mr.Chan Kung’s Father Foster Father
❏ Father: Taking Opium❏ Mother: Gambling❏ Both do not work❏ No conversation
between themWeak Family Relationship
Weak family relationship No support from parents
❏ Need to cook and buy food from himself
❏ Earn money from job❏ Not enough money for
studyingLimited Education Level
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Context of Development
Person
Mr.Chan Kung ❏ High independence❏ Healthy Body
2ND CRITICAL EVENT MARRIAGE
Time line
Now
Birth(1935)
Dropout of school(1942)
Marriage(1959)
Work[$40-$50/per month](1959-1962)
Have Lung Disease(1973)
Being Coolie(container terminal)Traffic accident
(1975)
Retirement(1985)
BackgroundCritical Event : Marriage
Mr. chan met his wife in 1951
Dating for 8 years
The thing that they did when they were dating….
- window shopping
- fewer watch movie
-a bowl of fish ball noodles for two (一碗魚蛋粉兩個食 )
BackgroundCritical Event : Marriage
When Mr. Chan was 24 years old, he got married with his girl friend.saving a lot of salaries for betrothal money.
learned driving for the working
Lung disease
Integrity vs. Despair
Generativity vs. Stagnation
Intimacy vs. Isolation
Identity vs. role confuse
Industry vs. inferiority
Autonomy vs shame & doubt
Initiative vs Guilt
Trust vs mistrust
Erikson’s stage Theory
Identity
Before the Intimacy vs. isolation stage:
Erikson’s stage Theory- Intimacy vs. isolation stage
Gain identity
Erikson’s stage Theory- Intimacy vs. isolation stage
• is the capacity to engage in supportive, affectionate relationships without losing one’s own sense of self.
Intimacy
• successful resolution of “identity”
• Mr. Chan had succeeded in former stage
• He probably succeed in this stage.
Isolation
• is resulted by relationships that are inadequate, lack of self-disclosure, and unresolved identity crises.
Erikson’s stage Theory- Intimacy vs. isolation stage
Erikson’s stage Theory- Intimacy vs. isolation stage
Mr. Chan and his girl friend
had to saving money for betrothal money
supporting and trust from each others
experiencing the intimacy stage
Levinson Life structure
1. Novice phase- period of adjustment
Because of the Marriage,Mr.Chan needed to take care about
his girl friend, so he was adjusted his
- work ability (learn to drive)
- money management (expenditure increased)
2. Mid-era phase
-adult become more competent at meeting new challenges through
reassessment and reorganization of the life structure
Mr. Chan was facing a challenge
-He required to take care the whole family
-Life Structure Changed(Personal->Family)
Levinson Life structure
3.Culmination phase
-stability returns, adult have succeeded in creating a life
structure that allows them to manage the demands of the new
development challenges
Mr. Chan have succeeded in creating a life structure
- Personal -> Family
- Establish a family
Levinson Life structure
Social role theory(Assortative mating)
Definition:Provides a different perspective on sex differences in mating.
Assortative Mating (Homogamy)
- The tendency of selection similar in age,
education, social class, ethic group membership,
religion, attitudes, interest, and personality.
Social role theory
Age: Mr. Chan was born in 1935
His wife was born in 1938
Social class:
lower class
Education: Bad education
Personality: Optimistic, Kind &
hardworking
background: they cannot recognise
characters
3TH CRITICAL EVENT RETIREMENT
Time line
Now
Birth(1935)
Dropout of school(1942)
Marriage(1959)
Work[$40-$50/per month](1959-1962)
Have Lung Disease(1973)
Being Coolie(container terminal)Traffic accident
(1975)
Retirement(1985)
Critical Event : After Retirement
Mr. Chan worked for many different work.
-work for uncle(~13-14 years old)
-driver(1959)
-coolie(1975)
Long working hours:
-16 Hrs./ day
Before retirement
Critical Event : After Retirement
Mr. Chan was suffered from lung disease, so he was token the retirement early at around 50 years old.
- Have lots of children and grandchildren.
- Satisfaction for children and grandchildren.
- relax and enjoy for life of retirement.
- He said “ ” 最緊要開開心心 that means he is a positive elderly.
- He is not afraid about dying
Integrity vs. Despair
Generativity vs. Stagnation
Intimacy vs. Isolation
Identity vs. role confuse
Industry vs. inferiority
Autonomy vs shame & doubt
Initiative vs Guilt
Trust vs mistrust
Erikson’s stage Theory- Ego Integrity VS Despair
Genrativity
Before the stage:
Lots of kids Being a good parent
Erikson’s stage Theory- Ego Integrity VS Despair
Erikson’s stage Theory- Ego Integrity VS Despair
Ego integrity defination:
- the sense that one has lived a useful life.
- Must clearly identify :
- Who he is and has been.
- How his life has been lived.
- The opportunities gained and lost.
- The preparation of death.
Erikson’s stage Theory- Ego Integrity VS Despair
Who he is and has been -Know his role(Grandfather, Father, Husband) -Share values with Grandchild(learn at least one skill) How his life has been lived -Stable The opportunities gained and lost -Job Opportunity (Being Coolie) [Gain] -Learning Opportunity [Lost]The preparation of death -Adornment(A small coffin)
Activity theory
Activity theory
involve greatest number of roles
• Father• Husband• Grandfather• A member of
community center(volunteer)
greatest possible level of activity
• Often do volunteer work
active adults
• Greater satisfaction
• highest morale when he talk to us
The Successful Aging
The Successful Aging
• Mr. Chan never go to hospital• Only Lung Diseases(1973)• Have a health body through middle and late adulthood• painful illness
Health
• MahJong• Price comparison
Mental activity
• communicate with lots of young people• Go to the Community Centre
Social engagement
The Successful Aging
• Being volunteer such as help to moving center’s material
Productivity
• admit old age term• enjoy the remaining life
Life satisfaction
successful
The Successful Aging
reflectionThe expectation of Mr. Chan to us long-life learning must learn more skills optimistic to face problems good money management develop a good life habit & have a healthy body
reflectionThe view to the elderlybefore this project: social burden sickness cannot take care of themselves Depend on others Memory decline Social alienation Inability to contribute the society Impossible to improve their health Lose the ability of learning Obstinate
reflectionAfter this project:
already have the huge contribution to society good health regularly physical exercise Can take care of themselves, even take care of
other family members Independent Keep memory
reflectionAfter this project:
Keep close touch with family members Active to join community activities Use their rich experiences to contribute the
society Learn slowly, but still interested in learning. Open attitude Optimistic
reflectionThe view to old age
do not fear
Courageous to face the problems, which appear to the gerontism
Follow the world (e.g.. keep learning new things & join different activities)
Cherish the life
reflectionWhat should we do for the elderly
take care of them, include material & mental
Pay more attention to them (e.g. Chat with them in daily life)
Support to them if they have something want to do
Cherish the time of getting along with them
Respect their opinions & suggestions
Reference
Thank You!
Q&A
top related