presentation - molecular medicine ireland

Post on 26-Mar-2022

5 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

The Dutch System of Research EthicalAssessment and Weportal

ReviewOnline

EFGCP workshop: Streamlining application to the regulatory & ethical review processes

Kingston-Upon-Thames, 2 March 2011

Marcel Kenter, executive directorCentral Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Presentation

• Dutch review system

• Implementation EU clinical trial directive

• Webportal ToetsingOnline

• Summary

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Presentation

• Dutch review system

• Implementation EU clinical trial directive

• Webportal ToetsingOnline

• Summary

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Legislation on review of medical research

• April 1999: installation of the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO)

• December 1999: Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) into force

• September 2001: Embryos Act

• March 2006: EU Clinical Trial Directive into force (implementation in WMO)

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Tasks of the CCMO (1/2)

• Competent authority of drug trials in NL• review specific categories of medical

research• appeals body• collect data of all research in national

registry

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Tasks of the CCMO (2/2)

• accreditation of local MRECs ⇒governmental bodies

• supervision of accredited MRECs• improving the quality and harmonisation of

the MREC’s review • make legally binding directives for

aMRECs

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

Researchwith

gametocytes

Researchwith

GMOs

Non-therap.research with

incap. subjects

Celltherapy

Embryo research

Genetherapy

Xeno-transplantation

Nucleotideresearch

Vaccintrials

Herointrials

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

Marginal reviewof

drug trials

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

Drug trials Non-drug trials

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

EC members

ECSOPs

Samplesurvey

Trial registration

EC accreditation

EC regulation

EC annualreport

EC directive

Observationalresearch

Sitevisits

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

CCMOwebsite

Houses of parliament

CommitteeOffice

CCMO

New Developments

AnnualReport

ECOversight

Appealbody

CompetentAuthority

EthicsCommittee

Researchwith

embryos

Research with

gametocytes

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Accreditation is given to MREC when:• minimal requirements for the MREC-composition are fulfilled

– one physician– one ethical expert– one lawyer– one research methodologist– one research subject member – one clinical pharmacologist– one pharmacist

• MREC has proper regulations • a minimum number of research dossiers is reviewed• MREC has a quality assurance system (e.g. SOPs)

• For all disciplines criteria have been established

• All members have to be approvedby the CCMO

Accredited MRECs January 2002

Average number of decisions/ MREC/ year; over the years: 2001 - 2002 - 2003

01020304050

60708090

100110120130140

150160170180190200

MRECs

Num

ber o

f dec

isio

ns

010

2030

4050

6070

8090

Q3

1999

Q1

2000

Q1

2001

Q1

2002

Q1

2003

Q1

2004

Q1

2006

num

ber a

ccre

dite

d M

REC

s

0

5

10

15

20

num

ber w

ithdr

awal

s

accredited MRECswithdrawals

Accredited MRECs in 1999 - 2006

non-official transition period professionalisation MREC’s

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Accredited MRECs September 2004

University medical centres

Hospitals

Others

CCMO

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Presentation

• Dutch review system

• Implementation EU clinical trial directive

• Webportal ToetsingOnline

• Summary

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Ethical review

MREC Compet. AuthorityMHRA

Protocol, IB & IMPD

protocol & pat. info

Medical & scientific review

Research file

Review

system in U

nited Kingdom

60 days 30 days

EudraVigdb

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Medical scientifical and ethical review Marginal review

Accredited EC Compet. AuthorityCCMO

IB & IMPD

protocol & pat. info

Research file

+

Review

system in the N

etherlands

60 days 14 days

EudraVigdb

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Central versus decentral assessmentCentral review• hudge workload• review by civil servants• review limited to part of the

research file• responsibility CA & EC unclear• no interdisciplinary discussion• harmonisation easy• scientific/safety review

independent of ECs• no support for ECs required

Decentral review• modest workload• review by peers in institute• review of the complete research

file• responsibility CA & EC clear• interdisciplinary discussion in

committee meeting• harmonisation difficult• scientific/safety review by ECs• support ECs is essential

BMJ 8 nov 2008

Letter to The Times, January 14, 2009

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Presentation

• Dutch review system

• Implementation EU clinical trial directive

• Webportal ToetsingOnline

• Summary

Webportal ToetsingOnline

ABR-form(research file)

Amendment

Annual rep.

SUSAR/SAE

End of trial report

ReviewOnline

Correspond.

Decision

Webportal ToetsingOnline(ReviewOnline)

CCMO website: www.ccmo.nl

CCMO website: www.ccmo.nl

CCMO public trial register with core data on different types of research

( February 2006 - April 2010)

obervational research

medicinal productsmedical devices

vaccin trials

other

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Presentation

• Dutch review system

• Implementation EU clinical trial directive

• Webportal ToetsingOnline

• Summary

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Decentral controlled & integrated peer review system

• Decentral:review by 27 accredited MRECs

• Controlled:oversight by the CCMO

• Integrated:all documents in one review

• Peer review:review by experts in accredited MRECs

• Limited central review:by CCMO (i.e., gene therapy, embryo research, xenotransplantation)

CCMO

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

Contact: ccmo@ccmo.nl

More information: www.ccmo.nl

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects

CCMO, PO Box 16302, 2500 BH The Hague, The Netherlands www.ccmo.nl

DisclaimerAan deze presentatie kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

Hoewel de CCMO grote zorg heeft besteed aan de in deze presentatie opgenomen informatie, kan zij niet instaan voor de juistheid daarvan.

In deze presentatie opgenomen opvattingen of meningen zijn uitsluitend die van de auteur en zijn daarmee niet per definitie een weergave van die van de CCMO.

De CCMO aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor de gevolgen van het gebruik van deze presentatie of de daarin opgenomen informatie.

Hergebruik van informatie opgenomen in de presentatie is toegestaan onder voorwaarde van bronvermelding.

top related