politics and language. virtually 100% spotless virtually: (adv) being in essence or in effect, but...

Post on 18-Jan-2018

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

(1967 poll) Do you approve of the recent decision to extend bombing raids in North Vietnam aimed at strategic supply depots around Hanoi and Haiphong? 65% approve

TRANSCRIPT

Politics and Language

Virtually 100% Spotless

Virtually: (adv) being in essence or in effect, but not in fact.

Palmolive guarantees that it will not in fact get your dishes spotless.

(1967 poll) Do you approve of the recent decision to extend bombing raids in North Vietnam aimed at strategic supply depots around Hanoi and Haiphong?

65% approve

(1967 poll) Do you believe the U.S. should bomb Hanoi and Haiphong?

14% approve

U.S. Supporting El Salvadoran Death Squads

During the 1980s, the Salvadoran military along with right-wing death squads terrorizing rural Salvadoran civilians during their fight against communist rebels. They believed that anyone working with the poor was being subversive and supporting the rebels.

America was supporting the Salvadoran military when its soldiers killed three nuns and a missionary, Maura Clarke, Ita Ford, Dorothy Kazel and Jean Donovan. The evidence was irrefutable.

Foreign Policy Advisor Jeanne Kirkpatrick

“The nuns were not just nuns. They were political activists.”

Secretary Alexander HaigI'd like to suggest to you that some of the investigations would lead one to believe that perhaps the vehicle the nuns were riding in may have tried to run a roadblock, or may accidentally have been perceived to have been doing so, and there'd been an exchange of fire and then perhaps those who inflicted the casualties sought to cover it up. And this could have been at a very low level of both competence and motivation in the context of the issue itself. But the facts on this are not clear enough for anyone to draw a definitive conclusion.

Senator Claiborne Pell Did you mean the nuns were firing at people, or what did you mean by an exchange of ‘gunfire’?

Thucydides-Peloponnesian Wars (c. 460 BC – c. 395 BC)

Interaction between political ideas and political language

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Unclear ideas result in unclear language use

Interaction between political ideas and political language

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Unclear language can also cause unclear ideas

Examples

• Euphemisms• Jargon• Bureaucratese• Inflated Language

Speaker’s Goals

Speaker’s goals and consciousness affect language

• 1. Sincere Goals• 2. Unconscious Objectionable Goals• 3. Conscious Objectionable Goals

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Speaker

2. Unconscious ObjectionableGoals

3. Conscious ObjectionableGoals

1. Sincere Goals

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Speaker

2. Unconscious ObjectionableGoals

3. Conscious ObjectionableGoals

1. Sincere Goals Clarity: meaning chooses words

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Speaker

2. Unconscious ObjectionableGoals

3. Conscious ObjectionableGoals

1. Sincere Goals

Speaker is unconscious that she has objectionable goals

Effect on Language:1. Words chosen without regard for meaning2. Words do not convey meaning (stale imagery,

incompatible metaphors)3. Words inflate the impression of communication

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Speaker

2. Unconscious ObjectionableGoals

3. Conscious ObjectionableGoals

1. Sincere Goals

Speaker is conscious that she has objectionable goals

Effect on Language:1. Words chosen with regard for speaker’s intent2. Words carefully chosen to conceal interests and goals3. Words chosen at variance with real or purported

interests and goals4. Bad seems good, negative appears positive,

unpleasant becomes attractive or tolerable

Unclear LanguageUnclear Ideas

Speaker

Effect of Speaker’s language upon audience

Listener

1. Language corrupts thought (Orwell)

2. Powerless not aware of their objective interests (Gaventa)

Society

1. Topics become socially settled.

2. Orthodoxy, restricted consciousness and unclear language

3. Limits ability to challenge powerful

1. Speaker’s consciousness affected

DoublespeakLanguage that pretends to communicate but really doesn’t.

It is language that makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant appear attractive or at least tolerable. Doublespeak is language that avoids or shifts responsibility, language that is at variance with its real or purported meaning. It is language that conceals or prevents thought; rather than extending thought, doublespeak limits it.

Solution?

2 + 2 = 4The invasion of one’s mind by “ready made phrases can only be prevented if

one is constantly on guard against them.”

Some thoughts• What is the problem with unclear political language?• Are there relatively harmless and also harmful

aspects to unclear political language? • How would you identify harmful political language?• What does Orwell say is the best way to address

unclear or deceptive political language? • Can you think of specific steps you might take?

top related