planning for a shared research archive: the hong kong ... · title planning for a shared research...

Title Planning for a shared research archive: the Hong Kongexperience

Author(s) Sidorko, PE

Citation The 3rd International Conference on Repository Libraries(KUOPIO-3), Kuopio, Finland, 29-30 October 2009.

Issued Date 2009

URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/127728

Rights Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License

Planning for a shared research archive:

The Hong Kong experience.

Peter Sidorko

The University of Hong Kong

Snapshot

• Hong Kong, its Higher Education system, their Libraries and more

• The University of Hong Kong’s repository experience

• Bringing JURA (Hong Kong’s joint repository) to life

• What this means for the future!

First, it’s great to be in Kuopio

Asia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Location_Asia.svg

Originally

Now…

ASIA: The World’s largest land mass

A Dot!

Hong Kong

But back to the DOT!

Hong Kong

• Geographic and cultural bridge between east and west

• 7 million people living on about 1,100 km2

• Major international financial centre

• Currently under the "one country, two systems" policy

• Astronomical real estate prices (World record set on 14/10/2009; HK$439m (US$57m), HK$88,000 per ft2).

Hong Kong Higher Education• 8 government funded institutes of higher learning (7

universities)• 3 ranked in the top 50 in the world, 5 in the top 200

(THES, 2009)• British and US based systems• Recent Changes to Higher Education

– Student demographics (3+3+4)– Economy (knowledge based priority – CE Policy Address

Oct 2009)– Impact of technology– Reduced funding - unprecedented– Desire for “deep collaboration” among the eight

• Wish to be THE Asian education hub• Move towards 3+3+4 Curriculum Reform

The University of Hong Kong - HKU

My University: HKU

• Evolved from the Hong Kong College of Medicine, founded in 1887

• Founded 1911, HK’s first

• Multidisciplinary/comprehensive - undergraduate & postgraduate

• 22,000 students (Government & self funded)

• 111,000 students (Continuing education school)

• Ranked 24 in the world’s top universities (THES, 2009), 18th in 2007

• Ranked 1 university in Asia (Quacquarelli Symonds, May 2009)

HKU content (June 2009)

• 2,729,901 physical volumes

• 1,895,309 e-books (400,000 more to be ordered 09/10)

• 57,862 e-journal subscriptions

• 707 databases

• Many locally created databases

Hong Kong Academic Libraries

• JULAC: Joint University Librarians Advisory Committee

• Long tradition of the silo• Competitive Collaborative• Recent collaborative efforts

– Purchasing, e and print– Cataloguing (within reason)– Statistics (within reason)– Reference (within reason)– Reciprocal (walk in) borrowing (within reason)– LibQual (within reason)– HKALL – greatest success

But what is HKALL?

• Hong Kong Academic Library Link

• User initiated, unmediated ILL among the 8 JULAC libraries

• Books delivered to your home library

• Union catalogue of all monograph holdings of the 8 libraries

• First of its kind in Asia

• First in the World to include a large number of Chinese vernacular items

• A virtual distributed shared storage!!

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

2004/05 2005/06 2007/07 2007/08 2008/09

HKALL introduced

ILL Activity among the 8 JULAC Libraries

… and why is this important?

• It set a new standard for collaborative effortsin Hong Kong academic libraries

• It has created an expectation among users and stakeholders

• It forms a basis for future collaborative efforts, in particular – joint storage.

The information environment, 2017?*

• A unified web culture

• The inexorable rise of the e-book

• More content explosions

• Emerging forms of scholarship and publication

• Virtual forms of publication

• The semantic web

*Information behaviour of the researcher of the future: a CIBER briefing paper. London: UCL, 2008.http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/research/ciber/downloads/ggexecutive.pdf

And this…

The university library of the future will be sparsely staffed, highly decentralized, and have a physical plant consisting of little more than special collections and study areas…

Libraries of the Future September 24, 2009

• Within the decade, he said, groups of universities will have shared print and digital repositories where they store books they no longer care to manage. “There are national discussions about how and to what extent we can begin to collaborate institutionally to share the cost of storing and managing books,” he said. “That trend should keeping continuing as capital funding is scarce, as space constraints are severe, especially on urban campuses — and, frankly, as funding needs to flow into other aspects of the academic program.”

Daniel Greenstein, Inside Higher Ed (vice provost for academic planning and programs at the University of California System) http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/24/libraries

The balanced debate?

Print or e-books,

Artifact or technology

or…

The “charming old lady” or the “paper tiger”

• Never Mind the Web: Here Comes the Book, Miha Kovač, Chandos Publishing: Oxford, 2008.

Continuity?

• “Digital futures assumed are not always guaranteed”

• (O’Connor, Kuopio-3, 2 hours ago)

• “You may not have the equipment to play a vinyl from the 1960’s or an 8-track from the 1970’s, but you can still pick up Shakespeare’s First Folio and read it.”

• Phillips, A. (2007) Does a book have a future? In: A Companion to the History of the Book. Blackwell Publishing

Repository experience at HKU

0

10 000

20 000

30 000

40 000

50 000

60 000

70 000

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09

Nu

mb

er

of

Jou

rnal

sCurrent Print Journals vs. Current E-Journals HKU

Current E-Journals

Current Print Journals

225 538

112 276

297 526259 773

322 255

53 76358 822

62 83458 357 57 565

30 000

60 000

120 000

240 000

480 000

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09

No

. of

Vo

lum

es

E-Books (numbers ordered per year)

Monographs purchased (Vol.)

Print Books vs. E-Books Purchased (HKU)

68,80 % 66,40 %73,20 %

0,00 %

10,00 %

20,00 %

30,00 %

40,00 %

50,00 %

60,00 %

70,00 %

80,00 %

90,00 %

100,00 %

2004 2006 2008

% o

f Jo

urn

als

ove

r P

rin

t

Preference for e-journals over print

The University of Hong Kong Libraries Biennial Survey

28,20 % 25,20 %32,60 %

0,00 %

10,00 %

20,00 %

30,00 %

40,00 %

50,00 %

60,00 %

70,00 %

80,00 %

90,00 %

100,00 %

2004 2006 2008

% o

f e

-Bo

oks

ove

r p

rin

t

Preference for e-books over print

The University of Hong Kong Libraries Biennial Survey

68,80 %66,40 %

73,20 %

28,20 %25,20 %

32,60 %

0,00 %

10,00 %

20,00 %

30,00 %

40,00 %

50,00 %

60,00 %

70,00 %

80,00 %

90,00 %

100,00 %

2004 2006 2008

% o

f E-

Bo

oks

an

d J

ou

rnal

s o

ver

pri

nt

E-Books and E-Journals Preferences

Preference for e-journals over print

Preference for e-books over print

GA

P

The University of Hong Kong Libraries Biennial Survey

HKU’s repositories

On site (300,000 vols 11%) Remote (500,000 vols 19%)

Remote storage usage

3 869 3 905

3 405

3 146

2 448

2 101

-

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

3 000

3 500

4 000

4 500

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Nu

mb

er

of

arti

cle

s sc

ann

ed

Articles Delivered

Down 45.7% in 6 years

Remote storage usage

4 473

5 594 5 827

5 387 5 397 5 467

-

1 000

2 000

3 000

4 000

5 000

6 000

7 000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Vo

lum

es

of

Bo

oks

Bo

rro

we

d

Books Borrowed

Up 22.2% over 6 years

Best areas of service delivery*

• Book delivery notified by email 88.96%**

• Service courtesy of staff 80.77%

• Ease of article retrieval 80.60%

• Book delivery turnaround time 80.46%

* 2006 Survey of HKU storage services

** % = Excellent or Good rating

Poorest areas of service delivery

• Locating the e-form 15.04%**

• Quality of scanned articles 10.72%

• Unfriendliness of the form 10.44%

* % = a rating of Fair or Poor

Typical comments

• [It] is in fact providing a much better service when compared to other library services

• Another great service from the library!

• Excellent service all round!! And thanks!!

• Make it easier to request the items.

Lessons

• Very surprising positive responses

• Very tolerant user community when the message is conveyed

• Seemingly trivial things (the forms) cause the most consternation

• Delivery time was not a major issue.

One other lesson: Chinese materials

• 30%+ of HKU print

• Fragility – books encased in 5-6 volumes for added protection

• Thread-bound

• Many large multi-volume sets (200+ vols)

• Poor indexing and table of contents

– often need to request 10s or 100s of volumes to find the right section

This brings me to … JURA

The Joint Universities Research Archive

• A Cooperative (share space) and collaborative (share space and collection) repository for Hong Kong’s 8 government academic libraries.

Why Collaborate?

• Finance, efficacy, spirituality

• Building costs: 1 to 3

• Rationalisation: less to manage

• Staffing: centralised, economies of scale

• Space

• Preservation

• Central ILL/DD

Issues arise, decisions to be made

• The facility: sharing or managing?

• The collection: sharing or managing?

• Ownership?

• Access?

• Costs?

• Logistics?

• Management?

• “Civilization exists within the context of … irresolvable tension born of compromise. To reap the benefits of a civilized existence, we need to curb certain natural tendencies. Library consortial activities … embody and reveal several irresolvable tensions.“

• Peters, Thomas A. “Consortia and their discontents.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29:2 111-114, March 2003

Typical obstacles to collaboration

• “rivalry and competition, mistrust and jealousy, politics and personalities, different institutional priorities and indifferent institutional administrators, unequal development and parochialism … negative attitudes, such as skepticism, fear of loss, reluctance to take risks, and the pervasive lack of tradition of cooperation”

• Fe Angela M. Verzosa, The future of library cooperation in Southeast Asia, p.7, 2004 Asian Library and Information Conference (ALIC), 21 -24 November, 2004. Bangkok, Thailand

Obstacles to JURA collaboration

• Metrics – perceived library status

• Personalities

• Funding

• Physical access

• Intellectual access

• Geography (really!)

• Competition vs collaboration

• Faculty reactions

• Institutional commitments

JURA

JURA Operational Characteristics

1. Overall goal

2. Size

3. Facility Ownership/Operation

4. Materials Ownership

5. Libraries Responsibilities

6. JURA Responsibilities

7. Use Policies

1. Overall Goal

• Provide fast and cost-effective access to lesser used, but still important, research materials

2. Size

• Hold, in a climate controlled environment, 7.9 million lesser-used, non-duplicate, book-like items which will be deposited between 2013 and 2029.

2013Opening day

2018 20252029Full capacity

2.9 4.3 6.25 7.9

Libraries Titles

1 4,444,828 72.00%

2 901,017 14.60%

3 435,440 7.05%

4 177,679 2.88%

5+ 214,136 3.47%

6,173,100

Monograph overlap (Sept 2009)

3. Facility Ownership/Operation

• Jointly owned by eight JULAC Libraries.

• Recurrent costs shared by the 8 libraries in a manner to be determined by its Governing Authority -- the heads of the JULAC libraries who are responsible for defining JURA’s vision, mission and goals.

• One library will manage the operations (an independent unit reporting to a JURA Board of Management).

4. Materials Ownership

• Materials remain the property of the depositing library.

• The intent is that they will be deposited in perpetuity, but they can be withdrawn as long as they can continue to be borrowed by the other seven JULAC libraries.

5. Libraries Responsibilities

• Responsible for the work and costs associated with the selection, processing and deposit of the materials to be sent to JURA.

• Materials must be in sufficiently good condition to be freely circulated to the patrons of these libraries.

• Materials must be catalogued and accessible via HKALL, and must have bar codes.

6. JURA Responsibilities

• In a cost effective manner, receive, preserve and circulate materials obtained from JULAC’s libraries.

7. Use Policies

• Policies governing use will follow those for HKALL.

• There will be no onsite access to the collection.

Physical Characteristics

Automatic storage and retrieval system (ASRS) in multi-storey buildings?

• Lowest operation cost of E&M systems is the lowest among the 5 cases studied

• The smallest building area (footprint)

• Shorter period of construction is needed

• Stored items can be tracked automatically and picked up fast. The computerized system also allows easy management

• Human effort greatly reduced

• Quicker access and retrieval gets material to end user in short time

• System speed and convenience will encourage use

Ultimately a 12 Storey Building

• 4 stories high ultimately

but initially only 3

• 1 JURA storey = 3 regular

stories

• So ultimately like a 12

storey building

JURA will have

• 59,000 metal bins (2’x4’ footprint).

• Different heights: 6” to 18” deep.

• Each bin can hold 750 lbs.

• Each storey has 2 aisles, each with own robotic crane.

• Each aisle is 35 -40 tiers high.

• 2 workstations per aisle with barcode scanners & printers.

JURA

• It builds upon the successful sharing of resources through the HKALL program.

• It creates the largest single historical archive of western research materials in Asia and will become an unrivaled centre for scholarship and research.

• It employs technology that will reduce the cost of maintaining access to an important and large amount of information acquired over the course of decades.

• It enables each of the eight libraries to free space for other purposes.

JURA

• Uses advanced ARS technology to provide rapid access to articles from older remotely-stored journals.

• Reduces the per volume cost of permanently storing these research materials in an optimal and preservation-sound environment.

• Strengthens the research material support provided to all of Hong Kong’s students and staff while allowing the libraries at each institution to continue to support their unique roles and missions.

• Provides the potential for greater exposure through better indexing, metadata, table of contents and even digitisation (scan on demand).

JURA: The Dawn of a New Era

JURA: A catalyst for change?

• Commitment

• Common, new goals: strategic

• Common, new goals: operational– Cataloguing and bibliographic services

– Processing

– Digitisation

– Digital repository

JURA: A catalyst for change?

• Better and more coordinated planning efforts– Joint strategies

– Evaluation, qualitative and quantitative, RoI

• Better communication, across multiple levels

• Strengthened alliances: unified and targeted

• Catalyst for change – intra and extra

JURA: A catalyst for change?

• Better knowledge of our collection(s), and each others

• Improved collection development

• Greater innovation

• Transformation of existing spaces for new user needs or trading /returning space to the campus for other priorities.

JURA: A catalyst for change?

• The opportunity for Hong Kong to participate in, and contribute to:

The Universal Repository!!

Wish us luck.

Thank you!

Kiitos!

谢谢！