parking requirements and housing affordability

Post on 24-Feb-2016

39 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability. Michael Manville Department of City and Regional Planning Cornell University September 19, 2013. The Purpose of Parking Requirements. Prevent congested curb parking. Problem 1: They Don’t Work Very Well. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability

Michael ManvilleDepartment of City and Regional Planning

Cornell UniversitySeptember 19, 2013

The Purpose of Parking Requirements

• Prevent congested curb parking

Westwood Village Parking Requirement: 1.5 spaces per efficiency apartment, 2.5 spaces per 2-bedroom apartment

Problem 1: They Don’t Work Very Well

Problem 2: Distorted Development Decisions, Distorted Landscapes

Pre-War Building7,500 sq ftPre-

100% efficiency

Same Building, 2013:

3,125 sq. ft. (improvements)

12 stalls (4 per 1,000 sq. ft.)

Illustration: MDA Johnson Favaro Architecture & Urban Design

42% efficiency

All transportation systems have three basic elements:

Vehicles Rights of way Terminal capacity

Trains Tracks StationsAirplanes Sky AirportsShips Oceans SeaportsCars Roads Parking spaces

Shifting the Cost of Vehicle Ownerhsip into Cost of Housing

• Makes it difficult to build housing– For certain people (those who don’t own cars or don’t

need them on-site with housing)– On some parcels (small lots)– In some buildings (historic structures with no parking

and no room to provide it)– In some neighborhoods (if a neighborhood is

dominated by small parcels/old buildings)In sum: infill gets harder. Housing at lower price-points

gets harder.

50 apartments

550 sq feet apiece

You think you can sell 50 units to people you don’t want onsite parking

• 1 space per unit parking requirement – 50 spaces

• 1 sq ft parking per 2 sq ft of apartment

• Go underground: lose six units to the ramp

• Underground only holds 33 spaces ($40-50k per space)

• 44 units, 33 spaces

• Dig second level ($$$)

• Can’t just dig 11 spaces – end up with 66 spaces for 44 units

• Marginal cost of the 34th space is extraordinary

• You need a variance (Good luck)

• Even with the variance, you are now building to a higher price point

Surface parking instead

Building shrinks to 30 units

You have 19 spaces

Still not enough; need to shrink to 25 units or get a variance

Again building for a higher price point

Things that don’t matter to the city:How much each additional space costsWhether off-street parking is abundant in the neighborhood (how much you could sell your spaces for)Whether transit is nearby

Why Can’t the Private-Sector Provide Lower-Income Housing?

Why Do Old Buildings Sit Vacant?

• 322 apartments, developer added 200 on-site spaces

• Downtown Requirement: 1 space per unit minimum

• With parking requirement, maximum 200 units

• Would not have penciled out• Historic building, fully

occupied, $1,200 month• Illegal to build it today

Concerns

• No one will build parking/ Spillover parking

• Meters (or permits) manage curb parking

Conclusions

• Parking requirements mandate quantity and location without respect to cost

• Attempt to solve a problem on public streets by regulating private land

• If cities manage street-parking, off-street parking takes care of itself– Cities that think they need parking requirements

usually need parking meters

top related