optimizing leadership a brain-based approach
Post on 16-Jul-2015
101 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
A Brain Based Approach to Optimizing Leadership
Susan PennReInventure Consulting
Neuroscience and Leadership Optimization
In a world of increasing interconnectedness and rapid change, there Is a growing need to improve the way people work together.
Understanding the true drivers of human behavior is becoming even more urgent in this environment
Neuroscience Research:The Brain is a Social Organ
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Social Neuroscience Research
Dodgeball/avatar experiment (UCLA Naomi Eisenberger)
Social needs treated in the brain much the same way as the need for food and water (survival)
When people felt excluded= activity in the dorsal portion activated (MRI) provoking the same sort of reaction that physical pain might cause.
Brain will label good/bad and trigger either approach/avoid within seconds.
Much of motivation governed by 2 things….
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Minimizing threat, maximizing reward
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
We’re making a decision about good or badall the time.
Safe or unsafe?
Ton of research in the last 10 years= the things that create the strongest threats and rewards are social.
Triggers brains primary threat and reward center
Feeling left out=same reaction as putting hand on hot plate
Link between physical discomfort and social connection
Social connection is necessary for survival
The workplace is experienced as a social environment, not merely an economic transaction.
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Threat or Reward…
…a neurological and largely unconscious mechanism that governs a great deal of human behavior
Encounter!-limbic system aroused-”Mission central…” survival systems
Activate neurons!
Release hormones!
Friend or foe????
Danger? Hijack! Emotional overwhelm…CALL TO ACTION!!
HOW LONG DOES THIS ALL TAKE?
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
The Threat and Reward Response
Easy to see how this helped us out a million years ago, but what are the things we react to now?
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Research suggests:
The same neural responses that drive us towards food or away from predators are triggered by our perception of the way we are treated by other people
More intense and longer lasting!
Big reframe of the role that social drivers play in influencing how humans behave
Being hungry=being ostricized, similar neural responses.
Social needs=survival!
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Challenge to leaders
Enormous!
People who feel betrayed or unrecognized at work
People who are reprimanded
Given an assignment that seems unworthy
Pay cut
Performance Reviews
Experience this as a neural event, a powerful, painful blow Become transactional, Impact on engagement, commitment,
retention when it’s perceived social context getting in their way.
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
The threat or avoid response is not ideal for collaborating with and influencing others
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
The modern workplace and the hypervigilent amygdala
A boss undermines the credibility of an employee, or perhaps just didn’t smile…. Perceived threat
Resources and executive functions in prefrontal cortex decrease
Less oxygen and glucose available
More mistakes, defaulting to generalizations
Less ability to solve complex problems
Reduced cognitive performance and ability to take risks
Decision making
Stress management
Collaboration
Motivation
….more?
The threat response is mentally taxing as well asdeadly to the productivity of the person
The “approach” response is synonymous with the idea of engagement
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
How creating ‘safety’ pays off in the workplace
Ability to do difficult things, responsiveness
Safety to take risks, innovate
Accelerate learning through ability to think deeply about issues.
Dopamine: critical for interest and learning, accessing the whole brain, ‘higher thinking.’
Building resilience from the inside out: Key to responsiveness in an environment that changes by the nanosecond
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
David Rocks’ ‘SCARF’ Model:
An easy way to remember the social triggers that can generate the approach and avoid responses.
To minimize threat responses
To maximize positive engaged states of mind
To influence others
Maximize rewards inherent in everyday experience
Helps understand why you can’t think clearly when you feel threatened in any of the following ways.
Focuses on the deeply social nature of the brain
STATUS: Your Relative Importance To Others
In the animal kingdom, status=survival
Higher status=lower baseline cortisol, live longer and healthier (primate studies)
Perceived loss of status: strong threat response Research, being left out of an activity, dodgeball/video
game
Very easy to threaten someone’s status: Meeting expectations Body language Introductions Verbal: “We need to meet,” “Let’s take that off line.”
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Certainty= Predictability
Hurricane Sandy: the feeling of uncertainty feels like pain. Holding multiple uncertainties in your head can be cognitively exhausting!
Big job of managers and leaders! Providing clarity about business plans, strategies
Break down projects into small steps
Establishing clear expectations
Setting structure in chaos
Give new hires an idea of cultural norms as they are onboarding
Other?
ReInventure Consulting, 2013
Autonomy= Control: The sensation and freedom of having choices
The degree of control organisms can exert over their environment=level of stress and functioning
Same stressor:
Inescapable=destructive
Escapable=significantly less destructive
Rodent studies: life and death
Subtle perception is important
Not micromanaging
Giving choices, decision making capabilities
Setting up desks, working hours
Relatedness: Friend or Foe?
The amygdala and meeting someone new (in group/out group?) Foe until proven friend (unless really attractive or you are drinking)
In the absence of safe social interactions, the body generates a threat response (life and death)
Tribes and sense of belonging formed in organizations
Gallup studies: “I have a best friend at work.”
The need for safe human contact is a primary driver (food).
Closely related to trust, collaboration, empathy, sharing of information Share personal aspects of yourselves via stories, photos
Water-cooler conversations
Buddy systems, mentoring or coaching programs
Fairness
Threat response can be triggered easily Favoritism: “He has a
different set of rules for Sarah.”
Incongruity: “We have layoffs, but they just bought new laptops for the Executives.”
Create through: Increase transparency
Allowing teams to
establish rules, initiatives
Self directed teams
Challenging Implications:
If you’re the boss, you trigger a threat response by simply walking in the room.
Triple threat:
Status: You “rank” higher
Certainty: What now?
Autonomy: You have more power
Fairness: You earn more
Keep Calm and Carry On
Rationalizing, tempering reactions or “sucking it up…”
Decreases commitment
Disengages
Disempowers
Results in ‘transactional employees’ reluctant to give of themselves
Big picture implications for leaders:
A new intentionality to address the social brain in the service of optimal performance
Create emotional safety and trust
Rethink old hierarchical approaches (HR, Executive Leadership) processes and “how we do things around here.”
Focus on team interactivity which reward working together
R –create hiring process and criteria (as well as performance reviews and other processes.
Building Resilience from the inside/out: A distinguishing leadership capability in the years ahead
What leaders can do:
Create shared goals, “in group” mentality
Work on certainty and autonomy to make sure your establishing clear expectations
Play down status, “link” rather than rank. Meet people where they are
Fairness: be more transparent
Relatedness: build mutual respect, shared goals, and insuring there is a feeling of being valued and on the same team
Set the stage for even informal meetings. Pace, listening skills key
Steps you can take:
Education and Training: Use interest, focus on how people are improving (increasing sense of status)
Create a Coaching Culture: Personal and Executive Coaching can increase all five SCARF domains.
Leadership Development: Train on how to impact each area positively through igniting an approach response
Organizational Systems: Reward systems more creative ways of motivating that are cheaper but also more sustainable.
Performance Reviews: Design and conduct with objectives to build engagement and alignment. Train Managers on how to set up.
Interviews: Selection criteria clearly defined and aligned with culture,inclusion, assessment processes
Bottom line: Leaders are cultural architects and environmental agents
“The ability to intentionally address the social brain in the
service of optimal performance will be
a distinguishing leadership capability in the years ahead.”
David RockReInventure Consulting, 2013
Bibliographies
David Rock, Managing with the Brain in Mind, Strategy & Business (issue 56, Autumn 2009)
Michael Marmot, The Status Syndrome; How Social Standing Affects our Health and Longevity (Times Books: 2004)
Adam Bryan: Interview with David Rock “ A Boss’s Challenge: Have Everyone Join in the ‘In’ Group ,(The New York Times, March 24, 2013).
David Rock and Jeffrey Schwartz, “The Neuroscience of Leadership: Summer 2006, (Strategy-Business article, 6/2007.)
David Rock, “SCARF: A Brain-based model for Collaborating with and InfluendcingOthers,” (NeuroLeadership Journal, vol 1, no 1, December 2008)
Naomi Eisenberger and Mathew Lieberman, “The Pains and Pleasures of Social Life,” (Science, vol 323, no 5916, February 2009).
top related