onehydro turbine
Post on 30-May-2015
2.014 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Radial Flow Turbine
Radial FlowTurbine
Patent PendingPresented by:
One Hydro Sdn Bhd
DISCLAIMER
This document contains forward looking statements and
projected information. The presenter bears no responsibility over
the accuracy of the information since they are meant to reflect a
product under development.
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 1 of 18
Radial FlowTurbine
Crossflow
Turbine
Pelton
Turbine
Turgo
Turbine
Francis
Turbine
Kaplan
Turbine
REACTION TURBINES IMPULSE TURBINES
Head (H)
100.000
Relationship Between
Flow Q(m3/s), Head
(m), Output Power
Hydro Power
Fundamentals
ρ x Q x g x H x ηt x ηg
Turbine Efficiency
Generator Efficiency
Electrical Power =
ηt =
ηg =
ρ x Q x g x HPower =
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 2 of 18
0.100
1.000
10.000
1 10 100 1000
Flo
w Q
(m
3/s
)
Head H (m)
(m), Output Power
Types of Hydro Turbines – Significant Flow
We are not into this business!
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 3 of 18
Types of Hydro Turbines – Significant Head
We are into this
business!
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 4 of 18
HPenstock
Power House
History and PatentsTechnology Inventor /
Date
Francis Turbine
(Reaction)
James B
Francis
1849
Pelton Turbine
(Impulse)
Lester Pelton
1879
Kaplan Turbine
(Reaction)
Viktor Kaplan
1913
1000 m
RA
DIA
L F
LO
W T
UR
BIN
E
Range of Application
100 m
FR
AN
CIS
PE
LT
ON
TU
RG
O
CR
OS
SF
LO
W
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 5 of 18
Turgo Turbine
(Impulse)
Gilkes
1919
Crossflow
Turbine
(Impulse)
Mitchell 1903
Banki
Ossberger
1922
Radial Flow
Turbine
(Reaction)
Kasim Ali
20091 m
RA
DIA
L F
LO
W T
UR
BIN
E
KA
PL
AN
10 m
CR
OS
SF
LO
W
Comparing Reaction Turbines
Kaplan Turbine Francis Turbine Radial Flow Turbine
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 6 of 18
Prototype Development
Project Title : B50 - Daeng Hydro Turbine
Date of Commencement : 16th Feb 2009
Funding Amount : RM150,000
Prepared by : Kasim Ali
Date of Report : 15th June 2010
• Contents
– Fundamental Principle
– Water Power Measurement
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 7 of 18
– Water Power Measurement
– Mechanical Power
Measurement
– Turbine Efficiency
– Testing 2 runners
– Test results
– Performance Curves
– Measurement uncertainties
– Comparison with other brands
– Improving efficiency
– Scale-up
Test Results
Manufacturer Country Website Model TypeHead
(m)
Flow
(l/s)
Turbine
Efficiency
(%)
Elect.
Power
(W)
Rank Note
Energy Systems
& DesignCanada www.microhydropower.com
Stream Engine Turgo 30.0 7.6 64.0% 999 10 **
LH1000 Kaplan 3.6 75.8 55.0% 1,030 12 **
Hydro Induction
PowerUS www.hipowerhydro.com
HV4000 Turgo 64.0 11.4 73.0% 3,800 6 **
HV1200 Turgo 50.6 1.9 76.0% 499 4 **
Canyon Hydro US www.canyonhydro.com Canyon751 Turgo 30.5 12.4 78.4% 2,035 3 *
Platypus Australia www.platypuspower.com.au PM1000 Turgo 30 5.5 69.0% 782 7 **
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 8 of 18
Platypus Australia www.platypuspower.com.au PM1000 Turgo 30 5.5 69.0% 782 7 **
St Onge
Environmental
Engineering
US www.hydro-turbines.com
DG-1kW Kaplan 6.5 31.5 74.0% 1,040 5 **
DG-3kW Kaplan 11 45 84.6% 2,999 1 **
Asia Phoenix
Resources LtdCanada www.powerpal.com
MGH-T1 Turgo 10 23 57.0% 900 11 **
MGH-T5 Turgo 15 42 68.0% 3,001 8 **
MGH-500LH Kaplan 1.5 70 68.0% 500 9 **
Kasim Ali Malaysia Coming soon Uniflo 100™Radial
Flow4.2 15.4 81.5% 363 2
* Canyon Hydro explicitly published their turbine performance data. Thus the data shown is as extracted from the publication.
** Other manufacturers do not explicitly publish their performance figures. The data shown is derived from input and output data.
Comparing With ENTEC AG
Year Model Effi-
ciency
1976 T1
1980 T3
1985 T7
www.entec.ch
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 9 of 18
1985 T7
1987 T8
1994 T12 69%
1996 T13 72%
1998 T14 77%
2004 T15 <80%
Coupling
Sleeve
Runner
Generator
Direct Coupling
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 10 of 18
Advantages of direct coupling
1. Zero transmission loss because there is no gear or any other dynamic coupling device.
2. Zero shaft misalignment since generator shaft and runner rotate as a single component.
Shaft realignment not required even after complete dismantling.
3. Low component count
4. Simple design and manufacturing
5. Proven design. Most modern electromechanical equipment use direct coupling.
568800
1000
1280
17201720
2720
3000
14
30.438
12.55 814
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Marelli MJH 630 SASyncro GS-LxS
800
1000
1280
17201720
2720
3000
3830
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Marelli MJH 630 SA
Syncro GS-LxS
Generator Output VS Speed kWkW
8-pole
(750 rpm)
10-pole
(600 rpm)
High Speed Generator
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 11 of 18
Generator Output at
1500RPM
Cost
RM 000
Specific Cost at Different Speed RM/kW
500 RPM
(12pole)
750 RPM
(8pole)
1,000 RPM
(6pole)
1,500 RPM
(4pole)
3,000 RPM
(2pole)
Marelli MJH 630 SA 1,720kW 800 1,074 610 477 355 225
Syncro GS-LxS 14kW 15 15,000 3,000 1,875 1,071 493
568
800
14
30.4
12.55
8
14
0
10
20
30
0
500
1000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
RPM
Radial Flow
Turbine
Typical Hydro
Turbine
2-pole4-pole6-pole12-pole
100% Load
100%100%
Rapid Shutdown – Minimum Runaway
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 12 of 18
50% Load
50%
50%
100%
Parameters Model - 6mm Turbine
Q (m3/h) 65 581.4
H (m) 2 10
D (mm) 100 200
n (rpm) 1600 1,788.9
Fluid Power (W) 354.25 15,842.5
Mechanical Power (W) ƞturbine 90% 14,258
Electrical Power (W) ƞgenerator 93% 13,260
Parameters Model - 4mm Turbine
Q (m3/h) 55.4 341.4
H (m) 4.214 10
D (mm) 100 200
n (rpm) 1213 934.3
Fluid Power (W) 636.17 9,302.3
Turbine
1,838.5
100
200
5,656.9
500,985.2
450,887
419,325
Turbine
1,079.5
100
200
2,954.5
294,163.6
Easy Customization
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 13 of 18
Fluid Power (W) 636.17 9,302.3
Mechanical Power (W) ƞturbine 90% 8,372
Electrical Power (W) ƞgenerator 93% 7,786
Parameters Model - 2mm Turbine
Q (m3/h) 38.3 143.8
H (m) 11.347 10
D (mm) 100 200
n (rpm) 940 441.2
Fluid Power (W) 1,184.26 3,919.1
Mechanical Power (W) ƞturbine 90% 3,527
Electrical Power (W) ƞgenerator 93% 3,280
294,163.6
264,747
246,215
Turbine
454.8
100
200
1,395.3
123,932.4
111,539
103,731
With a 100m head the same Radial Flow turbine with a 200mm dia. runner
can be used for a range of flow between 454.8m3/h to1,838.5m3/h ≈ 1:4
Radial Flow Turbine Final Design
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 14 of 18
Comparison of Features
Features Kaplan
(Full)
Francis Cross
Flow
Turgo Pelton Radial
Flow
Technology Reaction Reaction Impulse Impulse Impulse Reaction
Runner Profile 3D 3D 2D 3D 3D 2D
Full Load Efficiency 89% 84% 80% 82% 83% Comparable
to Kaplan
50% Load Efficiency 89% 75% 75% 80% 82% Comparable
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 15 of 18
50% Load Efficiency 89% 75% 75% 80% 82% Comparable
to Full Kaplan
Built-in water
diversion
No No No Yes Yes Yes
Specific Speed (at 50m head)
350 220 65 55 35 120 - 350
Customization
Range
90%-110% 90%-110% 40%-120% 40%-120% 40%-120% 20%-120%
Control Actuator Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Hydraulic Electric
Pre-Commercialization Turbine
Oct 2010 Dec 2010 Feb 2011
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 16 of 18
Mar 2011Apr 2011
Global Small Hydro Capacity
19GW/5yrs
11GW/5yrs
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 17 of 18
Source: ABS Energy Research 2009
7GW/5yrs
11GW/5yrs
Demand of 12GW/5yrs => Market of USD2.4 Billion/year
Early Market
• As per Ministry of Energy, Water and Green Tech
– 500MW of small hydro is to be developed between 2011 to 2020
under feed-in tariff
– Most projects are in Sabah and Sarawak
• Immediate Projects (2011-2012)
Prepared by One Hydro Sdn Bhd Slide 18 of 18
• Immediate Projects (2011-2012)
– Kampung Tg Rambai (Ulu Langat) 5kW
– UNIMAS Nanga Sengih Longhouse10kW
– UNIMAS Semulung Ulu Longhouse18kW
– Temir Resort, Raub (30kW)
– Mitra Kerinci Tea Plantation, Sumatera (1.3MW)
top related