nonlinear massive gravity and cosmology · • bianchi i universe with axisymmetry + linear...
Post on 19-Oct-2020
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
Massive gravityand cosmology
Shinji Mukohyama(YITP Kyoto)
Based on collaboration with
Antonio DeFelice, Garrett Goon, Emir Gumrukcuoglu, Lavinia
Heisenberg, Kurt Hinterbichler, David Langlois, Chunshan Lin,
Ryo Namba, Atsushi Naruko, Takahiro Tanaka, Norihiro
Tanahashi, Mark Trodden
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
Fierz-Pauli theory (1939)
Unique linear theory without instabilities
(ghosts)
van Dam-Veltman-Zhakharov discontinuity
(1970)
Massless limit ≠General Relativity
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
van Dam-Veltman-Zhakharov discontinuity
(1970)
Massless limit ≠General Relativity
Boulware-Deser ghost (1972)
6th d.o.f.@Nonlinear level Instability (ghost)
Fierz-Pauli theory (1939)
Unique linear theory without instabilities
(ghosts)
Vainshtein mechanism (1972)
Nonlinearity Massless limit = General Relativity
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Massive gravity: history
Yes? No?
Simple question: Can graviton have mass?
May lead to acceleration without dark energy
-
Good? Bad?
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Good? Bad?
Open universes with self-accelerationGLM (2011a)
D’Amico, et.al. (2011)Non-existence of flat
FLRW (homogeneous isotropic) universe!
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Good? Bad?
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Summary of introduction + a• Nonlinear massive gravity
free from BD ghost
• FLRW backgroundNo closed/flat universeOpen universes with self-acceleration!
• More general fiducial metric fmuclosed/flat/open FLRW universes allowedFriedmann eq does not depend on fmu
• Cosmological linear perturbationsScalar/vector sectors same as in GRTensor sector time-dependent mass
-
Nonlinear instabilityDeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Mukohyama, arXiv: 1206.2080 [hep-th]
• de Sitter or FLRW fiducial metric
• Pure gravity + bare cc FLRW sol = de Sitter
• Bianchi I universe with axisymmetry + linear perturbation (without decoupling limit)
• Small anisotropy expansion of Bianchi I + linear perturbation nonlinear perturbation around flat FLRW
• Odd-sector: 1 healthy mode + 1 healthy or ghosty mode
• Even-sector: 2 healthy modes + 1 ghosty mode
• This is not BD ghost nor Higuchi ghost.
-
Good? Bad?
D’Amico, et.al. (2011)Non-existence of flat
FLRW (homogeneous isotropic) universe!
NEWNonlinear instability of
FLRW solutionsDGM (2012)
Open universes with self-accelerationGLM (2011a)
More general fiducialmetric fmu
closed/flat/open FLRW universes allowed
GLM (2011b)
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
DGM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Generic vs degenerate solutions• Self-accelerating FLRW solution [GLM 2011a,b]
(3-2X) + (3-X)(1-X)a3 + (1-X)2a4 = 0, X = af/ag
generically two solutions X = X±• Generic case with X- ≠ X+ [DGM 2012]
Quadratic kinetic terms = 0 [GLM 2011b]Cubic kinetic terms ≠ 0 nonlinear ghost
• Anyway, 3 modes are infinitely strongly coupled
XX- X+
-
Generic vs degenerate solutions• Self-accelerating solution [GLM 2011a]
(3-2X) + (3-X)(1-X)a3 + (1-X)2a4 = 0, X = af/ag
generically two solutions X = X±• Degenerate case with X- = X+ [Masahide’s talk]
Quadratic kinetic terms = 0 [GLM 2011b]Cubic kinetic terms = 0 Quartic?
• Anyway, 3 modes are infinitely strongly coupled
XX- = X+
-
Good? Bad?
D’Amico, et.al. (2011)Non-existence of flat
FLRW (homogeneous isotropic) universe!
NEWNonlinear instability of
FLRW solutionsDGM (2012)
Open universes with self-accelerationGLM (2011a)
More general fiducialmetric fmu
closed/flat/open FLRW universes allowed
GLM (2011b)
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
DGM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
New backgrounds orExtended theories
• New nonlinear instability [DeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Mukohyama 2012] (i) new backgrounds, or (ii) extended theories
• (i) Anisotropic FLRW (Gumrukcuoglu, Lin, Mukohyama 2012): physical metric is isotropic but fiducial metric is anisotropic
• (ii) Extended quasidilaton (De Felice&Mukohyama 2013), Bimetric theory (Hassan, Rosen 2011; DeFelice, Nakamura, Tanaka 2013; DeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Mukohyama, Tanahashi, Tanaka 2014), Rotation-invariant theory (Rubakov 2004; Dubovsky 2004; Blas, Comelli, Pilo 2009; Comelli, Nesti, Pilo 2012; Langlois, Mukohyama, Namba, Naruko 2014), Composite metric (de Rham, Heisenberg, Ribeiro 2014; Gumrukcuoglu, Heisenberg, Mukohyama 2014, 2015), New quasidilaton (Mukohyama2014), …
• They provide stable cosmology.
-
Good? Bad?
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
DGM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
New backgrounds orExtended theories
• New nonlinear instability [DeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Mukohyama 2012] (i) new backgrounds, or (ii) extended theories
• (i) Anisotropic FLRW (Gumrukcuoglu, Lin, Mukohyama 2012): physical metric is isotropic but fiducial metric is anisotropic
• (ii) Extended quasidilaton (De Felice&Mukohyama 2013), Bimetric theory (Hassan, Rosen 2011; DeFelice, Nakamura, Tanaka 2013; DeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Mukohyama, Tanahashi, Tanaka 2014), Rotation-invariant theory (Rubakov 2004; Dubovsky 2004; Blas, Comelli, Pilo 2009; Comelli, Nesti, Pilo 2012; Langlois, Mukohyama, Namba, Naruko 2014), Composite metric (de Rham, Heisenberg, Ribeiro 2014; Gumrukcuoglu, Heisenberg, Mukohyama 2014, 2015), New quasidilaton (Mukohyama2014), …
• They provide stable cosmology.
-
Good? Bad?
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
DGM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Minimal Theory of Massive Gravity
1. Fix local Lorentz to realize ADM vielbein in dRGT
2. Switch to Hamiltonian
3. Add 2 additional constraints
De Felice & Mukohyama, arXiv: 1506.01594
• 2 physical dof only = massive gravitational waves
• exactly same FLRW background as in dRGT
• no BD ghost, no Higuchi ghost, no nonlinear ghost
Three steps to the Minimal Theory
More recent development
-
Step 1. Fix local Lorentz to
realize ADM vielbein in dRGT
physical fiducial
dRGT
potential
-
Step2. Switch to Hamiltonian
6 ( = 3 primary + 3 secondary) constraints
associated with symmetry of spatial vielbein
9 x 2 – 4 – 2 – 6 = 6 3 d.o.f.
2 secondary
constraints (a=1,2)
linear in lapse and shift
4 primary constraints
c.f. consistent with the analysis by Comelli, Nesti and Pilo 2014
-
Step2. Switch to Hamiltonian
6 ( = 3 primary + 3 secondary) constraints
associated with symmetry of spatial vielbein
9 x 2 – 4 – 2 – 6 = 6 3 d.o.f.
2 secondary
constraints (a=1,2)
linear in lapse and shift
4 primary constraints
Precursor theory
with 3 d.o.f.
c.f. consistent with the analysis by Comelli, Nesti and Pilo 2014
-
Step3. Add 2 additional constraints
4 constraints instead of 2
Only 2 among (C0, Ci) are new
6 (from precursor theory) – 2
(additional constraints) = 4 2 d.o.f.
-
Phenomenology of
the minimal theory• The remaining 2 d.o.f. =
massive gravitational waves
• FLRW cosmology: exactly same as dRGT
self-accelerating solution
• Absolutely stable: no BD ghost, no Higuchi
ghost, no nonlinear ghost
• Constraint from binary pulsar
mgw < 10-5 Hz
• Stochastic GW? CMB B-mode?
-
Good? Bad?
GLM = Gumrukcuoglu-Lin-Mukohyama
DGM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-MukohyamaDGHM = DeFelice-Gumrukcuoglu-Heisenberg-Mukohyama
Cosmological solutions in
nonlinear massive gravity
-
Summary• Nonlinear massive gravity
free from BD ghost
• FLRW backgroundNo closed/flat universeOpen universes with self-acceleration!
• More general fiducial metric fmuclosed/flat/open FLRW universes allowedFriedmann eq does not depend on fmu
• Cosmological linear perturbationsScalar/vector sectors same as in GRTensor sector time-dependent mass
• All homogeneous and isotropic FLRW solutions in the original dRGT theory have ghost
• Stable cosmology realized in (i) new class of cosmological solution or (ii) extended theories
• Minimal theory of massive gravity with 2dof results in stable self-accelerating cosmology
-
Composite vielbein• Composite metric in terms of vielbain
• Hamiltonian is linear in N after eliminating local boost w0I and N
i [Hinterbichler & Rosen 2015]
• However, Hamiltonian becomes nonlinear after eliminating local rotation wIJ [de Rham & Tolley 2015]
• Partially constrained vielbein [De Felice, Gumrukcuoglu, Heisenberg, Mukohyama 2015]
let w0I be determined by eom whilelet wIJ be fixed by 3d symmetric condition
BD ghost free & stable cosmological sol
( ) ( ) (f)
a a a
eff ge e em m ma
More recent development
-
New quasidilaton theorybased on composite metric Mukohyama, arXiv: 1410.1996
• Quasidilaton kinetic term is now defined on the effective metric new parameter
• Self-accerating de Sitter solution is stable in a range of parameters if is non-zero
-
New quasidilaton theorybased on composite metric Mukohyama, arXiv: 1410.1996
• Quasidilaton kinetic term is now defined on the effective metric new parameter
• Self-accerating de Sitter solution is stable in a range of parameters if is non-zero
Upgrade to partially
constrained vielbein
formulation?[DeFelice, Gumrukcuoglu, Heisenberg, Mukohyama,
Tanahashi, to appear soon]jk
top related