managing for development results (mfdr): framework for results

Post on 02-Jan-2016

68 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Managing for Development Results (MfDR): Framework for Results. 3 rd APCOP-MfDR M&E Workshop Phnom Penh June 28-30, 2011. 1. Presentation Topics. Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR. 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1APCOP-MfDR

Managing for Development Results (MfDR):

Framework for Results 3rd APCOP-MfDR M&E Workshop

Phnom Penh

June 28-30, 2011

1

2APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Presentation Topics

2

3APCOP-MfDR

Plan

Public Sector Management Cycle

Allocate Resources

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

National Development

Plan

National Budget

ImplementationNational Monitoring

National Evaluation

Sub- National Budget

Sub-NationalDevelopment

Plan

Sub-National Program

Implementation

Sub-NationalPerformance Monitoring

Sub-NationalPerformance

Evaluation

Sector Development

Plan

Sector Budget

Sector Program Implementation

Sector Performance Monitoring

Sector Performance

Evaluation

3

4APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

4

5APCOP-MfDR

Making PSM Results-Based

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

PLAN FOR RESULTS• Results /activities

defined• Indicators, targets

BUDGET FOR RESULTS• Budget aligned with

activities

IMPLEMENT FOR RESULTS• People• Policies• Processes

MONITOR RESULTS• Linked to planning• How & who• Data, reporting

EVALUATE RESULTS• How & who• Dissemination,

feedbackResults

5

6APCOP-MfDR

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

6

7APCOP-MfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Informed Decisions Continuous Learning

Core Results Attributes

Key FeaturesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Results

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

7

8APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

8

9APCOP-MfDR

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

9

10APCOP-MfDR

Capacity Development

Goals

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop actions

Country Planning System

10

11APCOP-MfDR

Senior Government Officials as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

11

12APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

12

13APCOP-MfDR

Asia-Pacific CoP on MfDR

ADB(Secretariat)

Onlookers

Active Members

CoordinatingCommittee

DevelopmentPartners

13

14APCOP-MfDR

Modes of Activities

• Virtual Learning

• Face to Face

14

15APCOP-MfDR

15

16APCOP-MfDR

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Define core attributes

Share good practices

South –South dialogueDialogue with Donors

Regional Level- APCoP members;

16

17APCOP-MfDR

Country Level:APCoP members as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

17

18APCOP-MfDR

18

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Bangladesh

19APCOP-MfDR

19

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Cambodia Rural Development Sector

20APCOP-MfDR

20

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Bhutan – Transport Sector

21APCOP-MfDR

Thank You!

top related