leveraging student data to create website personalization ian chan web development librarian,...

1

leveraging student data to create website personalizationIan ChanWeb Development Librarian, California State University San Marcos

2012 SLA-SD Fall Seminar Spotlight on the User: Enhancing Valuethrough User-Centric Design and Innovation

October 5, 2012

2

first, a look back…

3

customized start pages 1998 ~ ?

4

customization & library websites

MyLibrary – Notre Dame/NCSU, 1998developed at NCSU & Notre Dame and imlemented by VCU, LeHigh, others

MyLibrary – Cornell, 1998

More ExamplesMyLibrary – Univ. of Minn. Libraries, leverages campus CMS

National University of Singapore – Nexus (CMS)

Karolinska Institutet University Library – Drupal

PennPortal – Libraries – campus CMS

Dublin City Public Libraries – Netvibes

Galter Health Sciences Library – self-developed

derived from Aaron Tay’s 2010-06 blog post titled “Customizable library portal pages”

6

7

a new approach

8

9

10

11

12

13

15

similar goals, different approaches

customization

User drives content selection & layout

personalization

System drives content selection

16

personalizationPersonalization is a process that ‘‘changes the functionality, interface, information content, or distinctiveness of a system to increase its personal relevance to an individual’’ (Blom, 2000, p. 313)

17

assessment of a library portal

Galter Health Sciences Library studied the use of their portal from 2003-2008

“The automated application of specialty-based, personalized HSLs was more frequently adopted than manual customization by users” (Shedlock et al., 2010).

18

users want smart systems

“Student and faculty groups both expressed a desire for systems that know the individual better and that behave “more like Amazon” in remembering who they are, what they like, and where they left off in their work” (Jafari et. al. 2006).

19

20

what we’d like our site to do

Expedite access to our resources

Connect users with individual librarians

Personalize the research experience

idea

22

how we did it

23

project requirements (highlights)

Technical

Leverage existing user data transfer

Integrate login with EZproxy/institutional authentication

Secure

UX

Don’t bother the user

… but add value

24

we use…

Drupal

Minimal, custom PHP scripts

Data export from ILS

25

26

27

28

29

After login, users can flag databases as

favorites

30

31

Assessment

Click tracking – CrazyEgg

Web Analytics – Google Analytics, Piwik

Talk to users… in person!

32

4 days into test, we inserted the “Sign-in to access databases…” help

bubble and login button clicks jumped significantly…

33

Upcoming developments

Query user data in library catalog directly and instantly update course data

Integrate saved articles from Summon Discovery Service

Provide dynamic, course-specific library widgets to learning management system

34

Discussion / Q&A

35

References

Blom, Jan. 2000. “Personalization: a Taxonomy.” In , 313. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/633292.633483. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=633483.

Jafari, A., McGee, P., Carmean, C., 2006. Managing Courses Defining Learning: What Faculty, Students, and Administrators Want. EDUCAUSE Review 41, 50–52,54,56–58,60,62,64,66,68,70.

Shedlock, James, Michelle Frisque, Steve Hunt, Linda Walton, Jonathan Handler, and Michael Gillam. 2010. “Case Study: The Health SmartLibrary Experiences in Web Personalization and Customization at the Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University.” Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 98 (April): 98–104. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.003.

Sundar, S. Shyam, and Sampada S. Marathe. 2010. “Personalization Versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage.” Human Communication Research 36 (3) (July): 298–322. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x.