ir analysis for hbr,e0,v(m+4),v(m+5)
Post on 18-Jan-2016
27 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
IR analysis for HBr,E0,V(m+4),V(m+5)
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PPT-210912ak.ppt
Energy difference for H79Br
J' E(E0-V(m+4)) E(V(m+5)-E0)0 110.8 447.81 119.3 441.22 133.4 425.43 155.1 405.64 184.6 375.0095 219.3 333.526 266 302.2497 322.3 266*8 379 235*9 438.8 200*
C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
J’ E0 V(m+4) V(m+5)
0 77940.8 77830.2 78388.8
1 77956 77836.40036 78396.90036
2 77986.79 77853.69312 78412.49312
3 78033.16 77878.06234 78438.76234
4 78095.28 77910.28414 78469.89314
5 78173.13 77953.92664 78506.74664
6 78266.55 78000.15004 78568.39904
7 78375.01 78052.30654
8 78498.14 78119.54039
9 78633.99 78195.08787
Energy level
C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
https://notendur.hi.is//~jil3/work/HBr/H+%20HBr+%20Intensity%20ratio.pdf
J’79Br/H79Br
Lorentzerr
0 0.184306 0.050741
1 0.235326 0.01941
2 0.223628 0.00658
3 0.206655 0.003811
4 0.194449 0.002961
5 0.174378 0.002695
6 0.180262 0.002976
7 0.180051 0.00363
8 0.172899 0.006069
9 0.295534 0.04294
J’ 79Br/H79Br Gauss err
0 0.17151745 0.067497
1 0.251485153 0.039878
2 0.216297178 0.007494
3 0.203290844 0.004931
4 0.190338322 0.004036
5 0.173279687 0.003823
6 0.18006178 0.004252
7 0.180985532 0.005291
8 0.171468231 0.008916
9 0.364081064 0.096019
IR values:
C:\Documents and Settings\kennari\My Documents\Dropbox\REMPI\From Long\HCl EvsV paper\Graphs and tables
HBr, E0, V(m+4),V(m+5) IR(J´=9) W1 w2 a g chisq
0.17 22.2 9.39 1.95 0.04 0.0001560.18 21.1 18 2.36 0.032 0.0001440.19 14.92 16.29 5.3238 0.013616 0.000176
0.2 21 26.35 2.74 0.025 0.000260.21 22.995 31.787 2.3889 0.0276 0.000390.22 21.69 32.224 2.8821 0.021 0.000570.23 21.7 34.1 3.04 0.019 0.000790.24 0.25 23.44 39.9 2.83 0.018 0.001370.26 24 42.1 2.82 0.017 0.001730.27 0.29 25.156 47.244 2.86 0.013 0.003
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Deviation = 0.0057357w1 = 21.002cm-1w2 = 26.353cm-1a = 2.7461r = 0.025286d = 1
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Deviation = 0.0046953w1 = 14.92cm-1w2 = 16.29cm-1a = 5.3238r = 0.013616d = 1
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Deviation = 0.0084472w1 = 21.689cm-1w2 = 32.224cm-1a = 2.8821r = 0.021494d = 1
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Deviation = 0.0070381w1 = 22.995cm-1w2 = 31.787cm-1a = 2.3889r = 0.027632d = 1
HBr, E0, V(m+4),V(m+5) IR(J´=9) W1 w2 a g chisq
0.17 22.2 9.39 1.95 0.04 0.0001560.18 21.1 18 2.36 0.032 0.0001440.19 14.92 16.29 5.3238 0.013616 0.000176
0.2 21 26.35 2.74 0.025 0.000260.21 22.995 31.787 2.3889 0.0276 0.000390.22 21.69 32.224 2.8821 0.021 0.000570.23 21.7 34.1 3.04 0.019 0.000790.24 0.25 23.44 39.9 2.83 0.018 0.001370.26 24 42.1 2.82 0.017 0.001730.27 0.29 25.156 47.244 2.86 0.013 0.003
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp
100
80
60
40
20
70605040302010
0.0
08
0.0
07
0.0
06
0.0
05
0.0
04
0.0
03
0.0
02
0.001
0
-0.001 -0.002
-0.003 -0.004
-0.005 -0.006
Points for 0 < D1 < 0.001-for W2 W3
D1(z-axis/out of plane axis)
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
Points for Above (AK analysi)
100
80
60
40
20
70605040302010
0.0
08
0.0
07
0.0
06
0.0
05
0.0
04
0.0
03
0.0
02
0.001
0
-0.001 -0.002
-0.003 -0.004
-0.005 -0.006
Points for Above (JL analysis)
W2=49.8,W3=87.7:
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912aka.pxp; Lay: 1, Gr:0
The difference between AK and JL could be because of differen initial Values for WL and WH(?)
IR(J´=9) WL WH a g chisq g error
0.25 20 45 1.81 0.037 0.0038 0.025 0<D1<0.003 blue: fixed
0.25 30 65 0.74 0.095 0.0035 0.056 0<D1<0.002 blue: fixed
0.25 40 77 0.51 0.129 0.0022 0.055 0<D1<0.001 blue: fixed
0.25 50 88 0.293 0.236 0.0015 0.07 0<D1<0.000 blue: fixed
0.27 20 45 2.36 0.0250.0041
9 less 0<D1<0.001 blue: fixed
0.27 30 65 0.956 0.065 0.0038 0.036 0<D1<0.003 blue: fixed
0.27 40 77 0.6 0.095 0.0024 less 0<D1<0.002 blue: fixed
0.27 50 88 0.344 0.187 0.0018 0.058 0<D1<0.004 blue: fixed
0.29 20 45 2.9 0.0174 0.0047 0.0111 0<D1<0.005 blue: fixed
0.29 30 65 1.17 0.0467 0.0043 0.026 0<D1<0.006 blue: fixed
0.29 40 77 0.738 0.0713 0.0029 0.03 0<D1<0.007 blue: fixed
0.29 50 88 0.396 0.1515 0.0025 0.05 0<D1<0.008 blue: fixed
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/XLS-210912ak.xls
This suggests that WL & WH are high (ca. WL=50, WH = 88)i.e. chisq lowers as WL and WH increase and that >0 ( error < value)
Now let´s look at E(J´) and dE(J´) for the V states:See slides 2 and 3 above.
500
400
300
200
100
0
86420
E(J´) (V(m+5))
E(J´) (V(m+4))
J´
E(J´)
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL
?
J´=7: 273 instead of 266 J´=8: 250 instead of 235 J´=9: 230 instead of 200
?
Guess
This turns out to be no better!
500
400
300
200
100
0
86420
E(J´) (V(m+5))
E(J´) (V(m+4))
J´
E(J´)
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL
??
500
400
300
200
100
0
86420
E(J´) (V(m+5))
E(J´) (V(m+4))
J´
E(J´)
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:1, Gr:0
E(J´) (V(m+5))Predictions by JL
?
GuessFortesting
?
This turns out to be no better!
J´=7: 243 instead of 266 J´=8: 196 instead of 235 J´=9: 145 instead of 200
ERGO: JL´s guess turns out to be reasonably good!
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
8642
E(J´,J´-1)
E(J´,J´-1)V(m+5)
E(J´,J´-1)V(m+4)
J´
https://notendur.hi.is/~agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/July12/PXP-210912ak.pxp; Lay:2, Gr:1
top related