high grade glioma + brainstem glioma highly agressive tumours
Post on 12-Sep-2021
16 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
High grade glioma + brainstem glioma
Highly agressive tumoursMedian survival ca 9 - 12 months
Curative or palliative treatments ?
Intensity of treatmentSide effectsQuality of life issues
High grade glioma + brainstem glioma
Improvement of local tumour controlUsing the advantages of modern treatment techniquesCombination withchx. / „radiosensitizers“
Aims of radiotherapy
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
European Co-operation / data bank :> 400 pat.
„old“ countries: HIT-GBM-B , -C and - D prot. / data bank
Participation HIT-GBM-D protocol and Europeandata bank
Participation in European high grade gliomadata bank
Wolff / HIT GBM
High grade glioma + brainstem glioma
Age distribution / HIT data bank
Pons Cortex / white matter
3,00 6,00 9,00 12,00 15,00 18,00
age at diagnosis [years]
0
5
10
15
20
25
freq
uenc
y
Mean = 8,3653Std. Dev. = 3,27757N = 132
tumor site: pons
3 6 9 12 15 18
age at diagnosis [years]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
freq
uenc
y
Mean = 11,854Std. Dev. = 3,36413N = 80
tumor site: cortex and white matter
n=132Mean : 8.3 (+/- 3.2) y.
n=80Mean : 11.8 (+/- 3.3) y.
Wolff et al., 2007, submitted
High grade glioma + brainstem glioma
Location / HIT GBM data bank (2006)Overall survival
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0 2 4 6 8
y
years
Pat. Med. surv.Cortex 84 22.8 mon.Non-pons / others 92 10.6 mon.Pons 134 9.8 mon.
Overlap with resectability ?
Wolff et al., 2007, submitted
High grade glioma
Gender (cortical tumours) / HIT GBM data bank (2006)Overall survival
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0 2 4 6 8
Female
Male
Pat. Med. surv.Female 39 34.6 mon.Male 45 13.7 mon.
years
Wolff et al., 2007, submitted
High grade glioma
Extent of resection / HIT GBM data bank (2006)Overall survival
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0 2 4 6 8
Pat. Med. surv.Gross total 49 36.2 mon.Partial /subtotal 93 14.8 mon.None/biopsy 168 10.4 mon.
(Brain stem glioma : 118/134 - 88.1% -)
(Cortical tumours : 14/84 -16.6% -)
years
Wolff et al., 2007, submitted
High grade glioma
Spinal seeding at diagnosis
Author Pat. Rate Age group
Heidemannet al., 1997
41 4 (9.7%) children
Finlay et al.,1995
172 10 (6%) children
Packer et al.,1985
37 4 (11.8%) children
Benesch et al., 2005
187 9 (4.8%) children
High grade glioma
Hess et al., 1993 Chan et al., 2002
technique 2D conventional 3D conformal(2 cm safety margin) (0.5 – 2.5 cm
- dose escalation -)dose 60 Gy / 30 fr. 90 Gy / 45 fr.rate 58/66 23/34local 86% 91%margin 9% 9%out of field 5% 0%
Pattern of failureafter limited volume radiotherapy
High grade glioma
Pattern of failureafter limited volume radiotherapy
Distance of recurrence from primary site / time interval
46 cases of recurrences after RT tumour site 60 Gy, safety margin : 2.0 cm preop. tumour
Distance0cm <=1cm 1-2cm 2-3cm <3cm
Interval (mon.)Median 3.95 6.3 7.7 6.7 9.2
Migration of tumour cells (?) Aydin et al., 2001
High grade glioma
Conformal radiotherapy
20% less normal brain tissuewithin the
95% isodoseas compared with conventional
2 dimensional treatment planning
Grosu et al., 1998
High grade glioma
Question 1
Dose escalationusing stereotactic
approaches and modern imaging
High grade glioma
Dose escalationPatients : 34 pat with high grade glioma (33 glioblastoma, 1 anapl. Glioma)Median age : 55 yearsTechnique : 3 D conformal techniqueDose prescription :PTV 1 : (visible tumour + 0.5cm) : 90+/- 5 GyPTV 2 : (visible tumour + 1.5 cm) : 60 Gy (biol. eff. : 70Gy)PTV 3 : (visible tumour + 2.5 cm) : 44 Gy (biol. eff. : 60 Gy)
Chan et al, 2002Outcome : median survival : 11.7 months
1 and 2 year survival : 47.1% / 12.9%
High grade glioma
External fract. RT + Brachytherapy („boost“) / adults
Median survivalNo boost : 58.8 weeksn = 137
Boost : 68.8 weeksn = 133
p=0.101 (n.s.)
Selker et al., 2002
High grade glioma
RTOG 93-05 / glioblastomaPhase III : conv. RT/BCNU versus conv. RT/BCNU+stereot. Boost (15-24Gy)
Souhami et al., 2004
High grade glioma
Question 2
Target volume definition
High grade glioma
Target volume definitionPre or postoperative extent of disease
brain shiftAnatomical borders
infiltrationDefinition of safety margins
between CTV and PTV
Presently no standardsdepartmental policies
High grade glioma
Target definition 1973 / 4 year old child witha brain stem glioma / 60 Gy
Pneumoencephalographie2 lat. portals / a) 0-12 b) 12-60 Gy
2003, complete remission(endocr. deficits, no neurcog. dysf)
a
b
High grade glioma
Pre- or postoperative definition of CTV ?Technique / timing of imaging ?
10 cm 7 cm8.5 cm
MR pre-op. CT 1 day postop. MR 2 weeks post-op.
High grade glioma
Question 3Re – irradiation using
stereotactic equipment
High grade glioma
Re - irradiation in recurrent high grade gliomaRelapse of glioblastoma multiforme / 17 y. boy
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy
Before RT 4 x 5 Gy CR 1 y after RT
High grade glioma
Re - irradiation in recurrent high grade glioma / hypofr. stereot.
Author Numberof Pat.
Technique / Dose perscription Overall survival
Shepherd et al., 1997 33 Hypofract. convergence therapySingle dose 5 Gy, Eskal. 20 -> 50 Gy
11.0 mon.
Lederman et al., 2000 88 Stereot., hypofract. RTMed. 24 Gy in 4 Fract.
7 mon.
Voynov et al.,2002
10 Stereot. IMRT, med. 30 Gy(25-40 Gy), 5 Gy/Fract.
10.1 mon.
Bartsch et al., 2005
22 Stereot. RT 14 Pat. 45-54 Gy, conv. Fract. 8 Pat. 30 Gy hypofract. (6x5Gy)
7.0 mon.
Grosu et al., 2005 44 Stereot. RT, hypofract.36 PET/SPECT, 30 Gy8 CT/MRI (6 x 5 Gy)
9.0 mon.5.0 mon.
Vordermark et al.2005
19 Stereot. RT, hypofract.(4-10 Gy single dose)30 Gy (20-30 Gy)
9.3 mon.
High grade glioma
Re - irradiation in recurrent high grade glioma / conv. fract. stereot.
Author Numberof Pat.
Technique / Dose perscription
Overall Survival
Arcicasa et al., 1999
31 Conv. Fract. 2 D RTSingle dose 1.5 Gy, 34.5 Gy
13.7 mon.
Cho et al. 1999 25 Conv. fract. RT, 37.5/15 fractions
12.0 mon.
Hudes et al., 1999
20 Stereot. RT 3-3.5 Gy24.0->35 Gy dose escalationprotoc.
10.5 mon.
Combs et al., 2005b
54 GBM39 WHO III
Stereot. RT36 Gy (15-62 Gy)5 x 2.0 Gy conv. fract.
8.0 mon.12.0 mon.
Brain stem glioma
Benefit of radiotherapy (overall survival) / Dose : 54 Gy
Wagner et al., 2006
HIT data bank
Brain stem glioma
Impact of histological subtype on overall survival
HIT data bank
Wagner et al., 2006
Brain stem glioma
Expl.: Mask in a 6 year old boy withpontine glioma
Precise positioning
RT of tumour site / modern technologies
Treatment machine
Position for treatment delivery
Brain stem glioma
Prognostic factors
time between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis the presence or absence of florid neurological deficits resulting from brainstem involvement. The outcome is often better for patients with neurofibromatosis type I. A high rate of mitosis is a negative prognostic factor (15 of 18 patients deceased within 6 months). Rapid clinical progression. Multiple palsies of cranial nerves
Brain stem glioma
(No) benefit of hyperfractionation / CCSG / POG
Author Pat. Dose Survival
Freeman et al., 1988 (POG)
38 2 x 1.1 Gy, 66.0 Gy PFS / median : 6.5 mon.Overall / median : 11 mon.
Freeman et al., 1991 (POG)
57 2 x 1.17 Gy, 70.2 Gy PFS / median : 6 mon.Overall / median 10 mon.
Freeman et al., 1993 (POG)
41 2 x 1.26 Gy, 75.6 Gy PFS / median : 7 mon.Overall / median: 10 mon
Packer et al., 1987 (CCG)
16 2 x 1.2 Gy, 64.8 Gy PFS / median : 7 mon.Overall / median: 9 mon
Shrieve et al., 1992
41 2 x 1.0 Gy, 66 – 78 Gy Overall / median : 72 weeksNo dose dependency
Brain stem glioma
(No) benefit of radio-chxAuthor Pat. Dose + chx. Survival
Mandell et al., 1999 POG Phase III
6664
1x 1.8 Gy / 54 Gy (I)2 x 1.17 Gy, 70.2 Gy (II)+ simult. cisplatin (I+II)
I PFS / median : 6 mon.Overall / median: 9 mon.II PFS / median : 5 mon.Overall / median: 8 mon.
Allen et al., 1999 34 2 x 1.0 Gy, 72.0 Gy + simult. carboplatin
PFS / median : 8 mon.Overall / median: 12 mon.
Broniscer et al., 2000
29 54 Gy / 1.8 Gy + Tamoxifen PFS / median : n.a.Overall / median: 10.3 mon.
Bouffet et al., 2000
36 54 – 55 Gy / 1.8 Gy + High dose chx.
PFS / median : 119 daysOverall / median: 10 mon.
Doz et al., 2002 38 54 Gy / 1.8 Gy prior+ simult. Carboplatin
PFS / median : n.a.Overall / median: 11 mon.
Wolff et al., 2002 20 54 Gy / 1.8 Gy Trophosphamide + VP16
PFS / median : 9.6 monOverall / median: 8 mon.
Brain stem glioma
CCSG / POG : 8 prospective trials for hyperfractionatedradiotherapy with dose escalation
Total number of patients : 433Dose prescriptions : 2x1.1-1.26 Gy / 64.8-78 GyMedian survival : 6.5 – 11 months
5x1.8 Gy / 54 Gy : 9 months
No benefit of hfx. radiotherapyincluding dose escalations
Present recommendation : 5 x 1.8 Gy, 54 Gy total dose
Radio- /chx. in childhood high grade glioma
Rationale
Rationale for chx. before RTOpen blood brain barrier (surgery)lesser toxicity of agents, greater selectionof protocols, reduction of tumour burden
Rationale for chx. during RTRadiosensitization
Rationale for chx. after RTElimination of persistent tumour cellsMaintenance approach to prevent early relapse
High grade glioma
Survival in prospective series
Author Pat. Treatment Histologies Survival
Sposto et al., 1989 (CCG)
58 Phase III studyRT versus RT + CCNU/ VCR / Prednisone
High grade glioma 5 y. EFSRT alone : 18%RT + Chx. : 46%
Finlay et al., 1995 (CCG)
8587
Phase III studyRT + CCNU / VCR / Pred”8 in 1” + RT
High grade glioma 5 y. PFS : 33%, no diff.erence
Geyer et al., 1995
39(< 24 Mon.)
”8 in 1”, ” delayed RT Astrocytoma WHO Gr. IIIGlioblastoma
3 y. PFS All pat. : 36%WHO Gr. III : 44%WHO Gr. IV : 0%
Finlay et al., 1996
18 High dose chx. + BMTRec. disease
High grade glioma 16% DOC5 of 18 (28)alive 39-59 mon. after treatment
Graham et al., 1997
12 High dose chx. + BMT6 Primary / 6 rec. disease
”Glial tumours” 2 of 12 alive
Bouffet et al., 1997
22 High dose chx. + BMTPrimary / rec. disease
High grade glioma 15% alive 54-65 mon. after treatment
High grade glioma
Phase III studies
CCG (1989) (WHO III+IV) EFS (5 years) 0.026RT 30 18%RT + (CCNU,VCR,Pred.) 28 46%CCG (1995) (WHO III+IV) PFS (5 years)RT+ (CCNU,VCR,Pred.) 85 33% n.s.RT + „8 in 1“ 87 36%
HIT – GBM A (2001) (Gr. IV) med. survivalRT+ Troph/VP16 22 12 mon
(22% 4 y. EFS) n.s.RT / control (no chx.) 13 12 mon.
(4% 4 y. EFS)
Study Pat. survival Signif.
High grade glioma
Phase III study CCG934 RT + CCNU, Vincristine, Prednisone versus RT alone
Sposto et al., 1989
High grade glioma
Pre-irradiation ICE in high grade astrocytomaA phase II study / survival at 5 years
Lopez-Aguilar et al., 2003
n = 25 pat.AA : 20 patGBM : 5 pat
Overall survival : 67%
Disease-free survival : 56%
months
Cave : High contribution of WHO III tumours
T + E
Radiation 54 Gy total
fractions: 1,8 Gy6 weeks
T + E T + E T + E T + E T + E
Induction Consolidation
continue for 1 yearA:07.95
-04.97
B:04.97
-09.99
C:ab 01.99
Radiation 54-60 Gy total
fractions: 1,8 Gy6-7 weeks
Radiation 54-60 Gy total
fractions: 1,8 Gy6-7 weeks
PE
PEI
continue as long as progression-free
C C C C C C C
Interferon-γ individual max. tolerated dose s.c. daily
V V V V V
PE
PEI
0Repeat until maximal
response
v
Surgery
MR MRInduct. of
Differ.NUC NUC
Progression: oral Topotecan
MRMR
MRPE
PEI
C=cyclophosphamide, E=etoposide, I=ifosfamide, P=cisplatin, V=vinristine, T=trofosfamide
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
Acute toxicity of radio-chx.
359 pat., 187 pat. documentation complete (RT)Tumour sites : supratent : 91post. fossa : 7 brainstem : 79 spinal : 10
58 (31%) : interruption of RT19/58 (33%) : due to toxicity and tumour related
6/187 (3%) : discontinuation, all tumour relatedHaemat. Tox.(gr. III/IV) : 72/109
Fischer et al., 2004
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
HIT GBM A / overall survival (as compared to RT alone)
Overall Survival (Years)
543210
Cum
ulat
ive
Sur
viva
l (K
apla
n M
eier
)
1.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
.5
.4
.3
.2
.1
0.0
VP16/TRO n=22
4 censored
SEER n=13
1 censored
Wolff et al., 2001
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
O ve ra ll S u rv iva l T im e (Y e a rs )
54321
Cum
ulat
ive
Sur
viva
l (K
apla
n M
eier
)
1 .0
.9
.8
.7
.6
.5
.4
.3
.2
.1
0
M a in te n a n c e n = 1 6
8 a live
S a n d w ic h n = 1 51 1 a live
T rea tm en t P ro to co l
HIT 91 / high grade gliomaOverall survival : „ sandwich“ versus maintenance chemotherapy
Wolff et al., 2002
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
Before radiochx. HIT-GBM D / background
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
HIT-GBM-B
HIT-GBM-An
progressive non progressive
After radiochx.
Wolff / HIT GBM
Radio-chemotherapy / GPOH HIT GBM A - D
HIT-GBM D / design of protocol
Pons
Non-Pons
OP
Arm S
RANDOMISATION
Arm MMTX
MTX
Radiotherapy54-60 Gy
PEV V V V
PEIV
CCNUVCRPred
every 6 wksmax. 8 x
Arm SArm M
0 6 16 6422
128 12 60week
MRT
OP?
Induction Consolidation
MRT MRT
High grade glioma + brainstem glioma
Future strategies- Modern treatment techniques (3D / stereotactic techniques)
- Novel approachesantiangiogenesis, cell differentiationrecurrent disease : re –irradiation ?
- Radio- / chemotherapy (data banks !!!)sequence of treatment / chx. protocols
- Overcome radioresistanceradiosensitizers
- Local dose escalations (?) (stereotactic techniques)
top related