heverin iscram 2010

Post on 27-Apr-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation @ISCRAM 2010 on Microblogging use During a Violent Crisis

TRANSCRIPT

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Microblogging for Crisis Communication: Examination

of Twitter Use in Response to a Violent Crisis

Drexel UniversityPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania

Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Overview

• Purpose

• Description of Event

• Data collection & Methods

• Results

• Conclusion

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Purpose

• What types of information are transmitted over Twitter during violent crises?

• Who is creating and sending the information?

• How can official response agencies use the information transmitted on Twitter during violent crises?

www.ischool.drexel.edu

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Sgt. Mark Renninger, Ronald Owens,Tina Griswold, and Greg Richards

November 29, 2009

www.ischool.drexel.edu

“Four police officers shot dead in coffee-shop ambush near Tacoma”

Tacoma News Tribune, McClatchy Newspapers, November 29, 2009

www.ischool.drexel.edu

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Data Collection & Methodology

• Observations of Twitter usage

• Collected 6013 tweets (#washooting) Nov 29-Dec 1 via Twitter Search API

• Qualitatively coded data– types of authors– contents of messages– trends of contents of messages

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Results

• Author types and characteristics

• Message types

• Trends of message types

• Observed behaviors

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Author Types

• 1668 unique authors of 6013 tweets

• Citizens: – 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the

tweets

• Local/national media:– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets

• Local government:– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Author Types

• 1668 unique authors

• Citizens: – 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the

tweets

• Local/national media:– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets

• Local government:– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Author Types

• 1668 unique authors

• Citizens: – 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the

tweets

• Local/national media:– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets

• Local government:– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Author Types

• 1668 unique authors

• Citizens: – 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the

tweets

• Local/national media:– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets

• Local government:– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Citizen Geographic Distribution

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Information Broadcasting

• Photographs of suspect• Background information about suspect• Previous legal & criminal history of suspect• License plate number of suspect’s get-away car• Twitter & Facebook profiles of suspect• Locations of alleged sightings • Locations of police activity & response

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)

• Opinion-related (17.8%)

• Technology-related (3.8%)

• Emotion-related (3.7%)

• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Behaviors Observed

• Collaboration• Self-policing information• Citing information sources & creating own• Questioning information sources• Technology instruction

www.ischool.drexel.edu

Conclusion

• In this case….– citizens contributed the most to the stream of

messages – #washooting primarily used for sharing crisis-

related information

• Future work– retweets, information extraction &

visualization, law enforcement views on using & monitoring Twitter

top related