ghosts and satellites measured with the lhc ldm
Post on 22-Feb-2016
170 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
adam.jeff@cern.ch 1
Ghosts and Satellites measured with the LHC LDM
LUMI days 2012CERN
Adam Jeff
adam.jeff@cern.ch 2
Satellites, Ghosts: definitions
adam.jeff@cern.ch 3
Satellites, Ghosts: definitions
adam.jeff@cern.ch 4
Satellites, Ghosts: definitions
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-62.5 -37.5 -12.5 12.5 37.5 62.5Time (ns)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-62.5 -37.5 -12.5 12.5 37.5 62.5Time (ns)
SatellitesGhostsGhosts ≠ debunched beam
adam.jeff@cern.ch 5
Satellites, Ghosts: definitions
DCCT integrates all beam current-> affects fast BCT normalisation
Fast BCT integrates some satellites-> affects relative bunch currents
adam.jeff@cern.ch 6
The LDM: how it works
APD
TDC
synchrotron light
LHC turn clock
Electrical pulse
200
150
100
50
0
x103
1.774661.774651.774641.774631.77462x106
Arrival time
Undulator Dipole• Synchrotron light from BSRT• Dipole and undulator at point 4• Separate system for each beam
7
The LDM: instrument response
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Nor
mal
ised
cou
nts
2000180016001400120010008006004002000-200
Time (ns)
Laser pulse
Deadtime
Afterpulses Histogram integrated over 1,000,000 pulsesAverage 0.5 photons per pulse
Diffusion tail
adam.jeff@cern.ch 8
The LDM: count rate
adam.jeff@cern.ch 9
The LDM: deadtime correction
Availability of the detector in bin i:
Correction for deadtime:
Correction for deadtime and pile-up:
adam.jeff@cern.ch 10
The LDM: deadtime correction
Availability of the detector in bin i:
Correction for deadtime:
Correction for deadtime and pile-up:
Lab test with pulsed LED
adam.jeff@cern.ch 11
The LDM: afterpulse correction• Trapped charge carriers can generate a false avalanche• Happens at the end of the deadtime or some time after:
- multiple exponential decay, half-life 100ns to few μs• Parameters found by experiment• Correct by subtracting multiple IIRs
adam.jeff@cern.ch 12
Main bunchSatellites
Afterpulsing
Deadtime
Ghost bunches
adam.jeff@cern.ch 13
Corrected for deadtime
14
Corrected for deadtime and afterpulsing
Corrected for deadtime
adam.jeff@cern.ch 15
Average slots & Baseline20
15
10
5
0
463.0462.5462.0461.5461.0x103
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
20
15
10
5
0
463.0462.5462.0461.5461.0x103
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
20
15
10
5
0
463.0462.5462.0461.5461.0x103
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
20
15
10
5
0
463.0462.5462.0461.5461.0x103
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
-10 -5 0 5 10Time (ns)
adam.jeff@cern.ch 16
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
-10 -5 0 5 10Time (ns)
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
-10 -5 0 5 10Time (ns)
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
-11.25 -8.75 -6.25 -3.75 -1.25 1.25 3.75 6.25 8.75 11.25Time (ns)
• Mostly due to under- / over- correction of afterpulsing• Not equal around the ring – but we are only interested in average
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
-11.25 -8.75 -6.25 -3.75 -1.25 1.25 3.75 6.25 8.75 11.25Time (ns)
Average slots & Baseline
adam.jeff@cern.ch 17
Average slots & Baseline
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
-11.25 -8.75 -6.25 -3.75 -1.25 1.25 3.75 6.25 8.75 11.25Time (ns)
Average full slot:The +1 bucket is swamped by the diffusion tail of the main bunch.-4 to -1 and +2 to +5 are counted as satellites.
adam.jeff@cern.ch 18
VdM results: ghost chargeBeam 1 Beam 2
November 2010 n/a 2.5 +2.5/-0.6
March 2011 n/a 0.6 +0.6/-0.2
May 0.18 +0.18/-0.04 0.40 +0.4/-0.1
October 0.69 +0.7/-0.2 0.71 +0.7/-0.2
December f2335 3.1 +3.1/-0.8 2.8 +2.8/-0.7December f2337 2.1 +2.1/-0.5 2.3 +2.3/-0.6
Definition: % of total beam population which is outside the filled slots
adam.jeff@cern.ch 19
VdM results: satellitesBeam 1 Beam 2
November 2010 n/a 0.4 +/- 0.1
March 2011 n/a 0.1 +0.05/-0.03
May 0.02 +0.03/-0.01 0.12 +/- 0.03
October 0.21 +0.06/-0.08 0.57 +0.17/-0.12
December f2335 0.38 +/- 0.1 0.34 +0.1/-0.08December f2337 0.28 +0.08/-0.06 0.29 +0.08/-0.06
Definition: % of filled slot population which is outside the filled bucket or the following bucket
Averaged for whole time of scan and for all filled slots – results for a subset of bunches can be calculated if you ask nicely.
adam.jeff@cern.ch 20
Error inventoryError for ghost charge Error for Satellites
Statistical 10 % 5 %
Baseline uncertainty 12 % 3 %
Emittance dependence 20 % 20 %
Debunched beam 100 % ?! 25 % ?!
Typical values - 68 % CL
Total -25% / +100% -20% / + 30%
LDM baseline correction assumes zero debunched beam- consistent with beam gas and abort gap monitor
adam.jeff@cern.ch 21
LDM vs fBCT
Disagreement between LDM and fast BCT on main bunch populations is usually <2%Occasionally up to 5%, probably due to emittance spread.
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
LDM
- FB
CT
(%)
95x10990858075FBCT
80x109
60
40
20
0
LDM
(nor
mal
ised
)
80x1096040200Fast BCT
y=x
adam.jeff@cern.ch 22
Emittance dependence
• Active area of APD is only 50 microns• Beam spot size ~300 microns• Samples only part of the beam spot
>>> Measured bunch population depends on transverse size
adam.jeff@cern.ch 23
Thanks for your attention
top related