fy2015 teacher evaluationsnews.palmbeachschools.org/pa/files/2015/04/fy2015-eval-models-v12... ·...
Post on 08-May-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
FY2015 Teacher Evaluations
State Required and District Selected Student Performance Models
April 2015 CAO
Goals for Today
• Requirements for Student Performance
• Committee Input
• Assessments Used for Student Performance
• Cohort Model
• Rating Distribution Model
FY2015 Student Performance Component Goals
• No additional assessments
• Comply with state requirements
• Provide fair and equitable outcomes
• Provide feedback for improvement
Indicates New in FY2015
FY2015 Committee Input
• Joint Evaluation Negotiation Committee (JENC) – CTA
– District Administration
– Teachers
– Principals
– Teachers
• Student Performance Steering Committee – Elementary, Middle, High School Principals
– Teachers
– District Administrators
District Decisions
• Student Performance Component
–How to apply State VAM for Ratings
– FY2015 assessments to be used
–Model(s) for using assessments
–Which assessment(s) applied to teachers based on grade level, subject area, courses or roles
FY2015 STATE REQUIREMENTS Overall Teacher Evaluation Requirements
Florida Teacher Evaluation System
• Statutory Requirements
– 2011: Established by Student Success Act (SB 736)
– 2013-14: F.S. 1012.34, F.S.1008.22 and S.B. 1664
• Teacher Evaluation Components
– Instructional Practice
– Student Performance Measures
– Professional Job Responsibility
• FY2014 Legislative Impact
– SB 1664: Student Performance components shall be based on the students assigned to teacher
FY2015 Overall Requirements
Components of Teacher Evaluations
• Instructional Practice (58% - 48%)
• Professional Job Responsibilities (2%)
• Student Performance “VAM” (40% - 50%)
– 50% if a teacher has 3 consecutive years of VAM data (reading or mathematics)
– State will provide a combined 3-year score
F.S. 1012.34
FY2015 Overall Requirements
FY2015 Required Statewide Test Data for Teacher Evaluations
• Statewide Value-added Model (VAM) Data
– FSA English Language Arts Grades 4-10
– FSA Math Grades 4-8
– Algebra 1 Grades 8 & 9
S.B. 1664
FY2015 Required Statewide Test Data for Teacher Evaluations
• Other Statewide Assessments Required in FY2015
– FSA English Language Arts Grade 3
– FSA Math Grade 3
– NGSSS Science Grades 5, 8
– Civics, Algebra 2, Geometry, Biology 1, US History
S.B. 1664
FY2015 Required Test Data for Teacher Evaluations
Local Assessment Data may include: 1. Statewide assessments 2. Other standardized assessments, including nationally recognized standardized assessments 3. Industry certification assessments 4. District-developed or district-selected end-of-course assessments. 5. Teacher-selected or principal-selected assessments
Local assessments implemented including, but not limited to,
• project-based assessments,
• adjudicated performances, and
• practical application assignments. FS 1008.22
FY2015 ASSESSMENTS FOR TEACHER EVALUATIONS
Student Performance Component
FY2015 Assessments for Elementary School Teacher Evaluations
Grade Assessment State Required / District Selected
Teacher Performance
Scores
K Early Literacy Behaviors District Selected District
1-2 Palm Beach Performance Assessment (PBPA)
District Developed District
3 Florida Standards ELA Florida Standards Math
State Required District
4-5 Florida Standards ELA State Required State VAM
4-5 Florida Standards Math State Required State VAM
5 FCAT 2.0 Science State Required District
Kindergarten: Early Literacy Behaviors Aug-Oct (PRE) May (POST)
Oral Language 1 = 2 or below
2 = 3 – 4
3 = 5 – 6
4 = 7 – 9
Oral Language
1 = 5 – 6
2 = 7 – 9
3 = 10
4 = 11+
Concepts of Print 1 = 1
2 = 2 – 3
3 = 4 – 5
4 = 6+
Concepts of Print 1 = 7
2 = 8 – 9
3 = 10
4 = 10 Prior May
Combined Letter ID 1 = 6 or below
2 = 7 – 14
3 = 15 – 20
4 = 20+
Combined Letter ID 1 = 18 – 34
2 = 35 – 45
3 = 46 – 50
4 = 51 – 52
Letter Sound 1 = 4 or below
2 = 5 – 8
3 = 9 – 13
4 = 14+
Letter Sound 1 = 9 – 13
2 = 14 – 16
3 = 17 – 18
4 = 19
Word List 1 = 4 or below
2 = 5 - 9
3 = 10 – 24
4 = 25 – 44+
Word List 1 = 10 – 24
2 = 25 – 44
3 = 45 – 55
4 = 56+
Grade 1-2: Palm Beach Performance Assessment
Number of
Points
Scaled
Score
1 – 6 1
7 – 10 2
11 – 14 3
15 – 18 4*
19 – 21 5
22 - 24 6
Grade 1 – Scoring Table
*End of Year Proficiency: Level 4
Number of
Points
Scaled
Score
1 – 10 1
11 – 18 2
19 – 25 3
26 – 32 4*
33 – 38 5
39 – 42 6
Grade 2 – Scoring Table
*End of Year Proficiency: Level 4
FY2015 Assessments for Middle School Teacher Evaluations
Grade Assessment State Required / District Selected
Teacher Performance
Scores
6-8 Florida Standards ELA State Required State VAM
6-8 Florida Standards Math State Required State VAM
7 Civics EOC State Required District
8 Algebra 1 EOC State Required State VAM
8 FCAT 2.0 Science State Required District
FY2015 Assessments for High School Teacher Evaluations
Grade Assessment State Required / District Selected
Teacher Performance
Scores
9-10 Florida Standards ELA State Required State VAM
9 Algebra 1 EOC State Required State VAM
Enrolled Algebra 2 EOC State Required District
Enrolled Geometry EOC State Required District
Enrolled Biology 1 EOC State Required District
Enrolled US History EOC State Required District
11 SAT District Selected District
11-12 FCAT 2.0 Reading Retake District Selected District
DISTRICT DEVELOPED MODEL FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE RATINGS
Student Performance Component
“Cohort” Model • Pre-test/Post-test Model
• Teachers bracketed into “COHORTS” based on average prior performance of students – Avg. FCAT Reading Level
– Ex: Teacher’s students on average are Level 1
• Teachers compared to District average based on average current performance
• Rating levels aligned based on prior performance of students
• Create teacher rating distributions similar to State VAM (HE, EFF, NI/D, UN)
“Cohort” Model Elementary School Teachers
Post-Test Pre-Test Elementary Literacy Behaviors Elementary Literacy Behaviors
Palm Beach Performance Assessment Palm Beach Performance Assessment
Grade 3 Florida Standards ELA Grade 2 Spring Diagnostic
Grade 3 Math Grade 2 Spring Diagnostic
Grade 5 FCAT 2.0 Science Grade 4 FCAT 2.0 Reading
“Cohort” Model Middle School Teachers
Post-Test Pre-Test Grade 8 FCAT 2.0 Science Grade 7 FCAT 2.0 Reading
Grade 7 Civics Grade 6 FCAT Reading
Geometry Prior Year Math/EOC
“Cohort” Model High School Teachers
Post-Test Pre-Test Algebra 2 EOC Prior Year Math/EOC
Geometry EOC Prior Year Math/EOC
Biology EOC Prior Year FCAT Reading
U.S. History EOC Grade 10 FCAT Reading
FCAT 2.0 Reading Retake Prior Year FCAT Reading
SAT Grade 10 FCAT Reading
Teacher Average Teacher 1 Teacher 2 Teacher 3 Teacher 4 Teacher 5
Stu
de
nt
Sc
ore
s
Stu 1 1 2 3 5 5
Stu 2 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 3 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 4 1 1 2 2 3
Stu 5 1 2 3 5 5
Stu 6 2 2 3 3 3
Stu 7 1 2 3 5 5
Stu 8 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 9 2 2 4 3 3
Stu 10 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 11 1 3 5 5 4
Stu 12 1 3 5 5 4
Stu 13 1 2 3 4 4
Stu 14 1 3 5 3 5
Stu 15 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 16 2 1 2 2 4
Stu 17 1 1 2 2 3
Stu 18 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 19 2 2 3 5 5
Stu 20 1 2 3 5 5
Avg. 1.50 2.00 3.24 4.12 4.53
Q: What is the average prior year performance? A: Average achievement level of students assigned.
Cohort (Pre-Test/Post) Test Model Y
Axi
s: P
ost
-te
st P
erf
orm
ance
X Axis: Pre-test Performance
Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4
HI EFF
EFF
NI/D
UN
Cohort (Pre-Test/Post) Test Model Y
Axi
s: P
ost
-te
st P
erf
orm
ance
X Axis: Pre-test Performance
Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4
HI EFF
EFF
NI/D
UN
Teacher Cohort: Average Performance of
Students on Prior Year Test
Cohort (Pre-Test/Post) Test Model Y
Axi
s: P
ost
-te
st P
erf
orm
ance
X Axis: Pre-test Performance
Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4
HI EFF
EFF
NI/D
UN
Teacher Rating: Average Performance on Current Year Test
ILLUSTRATION OF COHORT MODEL Student Performance Component
Cohort Model Illustration
Performance compared to District Average
Current Year
Avg. Performance of Teacher’s Students Prior Year
Avg. Level 1
(1.0-1.9)
Avg. Level 2
(2.0-2.9)
Avg. Level 3
(3.0-3.9)
Avg. Level 4-5 (4.0-5.0)
HE HE HE HE
HE HE HE EFF
HE HE EFF EFF
HE EFF EFF NI/DEV
EFF EFF NI/DEV UN
EFF NI/DEV NI/DEV UN
NI/DEVE NI/DEV UN UN
UN UN UN UN
PERFORMANCE BANDS FOR CURRENT YEAR --District Average--
Cohort Model Overview
Performance compared to District Average
Current Year
Avg. Performance of Teacher’s Students Prior Year
Avg. Level 1
(1.0-1.9)
Avg. Level 2
(2.0-2.9)
Avg. Level 3
(3.0-3.9)
Avg. Level 4-5 (4.0-5.0)
HE HE HE HE
HE HE HE EFF
HE HE EFF EFF
HE EFF EFF NI/DEV
EFF EFF NI/DEV UN
EFF NI/DEV NI/DEV UN
NI/DEVE NI/DEV UN UN
UN UN UN UN
PERFORMANCE BANDS FOR CURRENT YEAR --District Average--
Cohort Model Overview
Performance compared to District Average
Current Year
Avg. Performance of Teacher’s Students Prior Year
Avg. Level 1
(1.0-1.9)
Avg. Level 2
(2.0-2.9)
Avg. Level 3
(3.0-3.9)
Avg. Level 4-5 (4.0-5.0)
HE HE HE HE
HE HE HE EFF
HE HE EFF EFF
HE EFF EFF NI/DEV
EFF EFF NI/DEV UN
EFF NI/DEV NI/DEV UN
NI/DEVE NI/DEV UN UN
UN UN UN UN
PERFORMANCE BANDS FOR CURRENT YEAR --District Average--
Cohort Model Overview
Performance compared to District Average
Current Year
Avg. Performance of Teacher’s Students Prior Year
Avg. Level 1
(1.0-1.9)
Avg. Level 2
(2.0-2.9)
Avg. Level 3
(3.0-3.9)
Avg. Level 4-5 (4.0-5.0)
HE HE HE HE
HE HE HE EFF
HE HE EFF EFF
HE EFF EFF NI/DEV
EFF EFF NI/DEV NI/DEV
EFF NI/DEV NI/DEV UN
NI/DEVE NI/DEV UN UN
UN UN UN UN
PERFORMANCE BANDS FOR CURRENT YEAR --District Average--
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
HE 87-100 %
EFF 15% - < 87%
NI/D 2 - < 15%
UN 0 - <2%
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
Mean Score
-1 SD
-2 SD
+2 SD
+1 SD
2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
Probably more than
others
Different than others
Mean Score
-1 SD
-2 SD
+2 SD
+1 SD
2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
Same as others
Probably more than
others
Different than others
Mean Score
-1 SD
-2 SD
+2 SD
+1 SD
2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
Same as others
Probably more than
others
Probably less than
others
Different than others
Mean Score
-1 SD
-2 SD
+2 SD
+1 SD
2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
Setting Distributions for Student Performance Ratings
Same as others
Probably more than
others
Probably less than
others
Different than others
Different than others
Mean Score
-1 SD
-2 SD
+2 SD
+1 SD
2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
STUDENT PERFORMANCE SCORE TYPES
Student Performance Component
FY2015 Elementary School Teacher Student Performance Score Types
Score Type Description
Elementary Literacy Behaviors (ELB)
• Majority of students in Grades K
Palm Beach Performance Assessment (PBPA)
• Majority of students in Grades 1-2
Grade 3 FSA Reading/Math • Majority of students in Grade 3
FSA Reading/Math VAM • Teach Grade 4-5 ELA/Reading/Math courses
Non-FSA Reading/Math VAM • Do not teach ELA/Reading/Math courses • Teach majority of students in Grades 4-5
Grade 5 FCAT 2.0 Science • Assigned Grade 5 Science course
School VAM • Do not have 10 or more students with scores • More than 1 school assigned, District VAM Score
*Scores may be combined for teachers based on course/grade assignment Based on Survey 2 – 3 match and minimum of 10 students
FY14 Middle School Teacher Student Performance Score Types
Score Type Description
FSA Reading VAM • Teach Grade 6-8 ELA/Reading courses • 10 or more students with FSA VAM scores
FSA Math VAM • Teach Grade 6-8 Math courses • 10 or more students with FSA VAM scores
Non-FSA Reading/Math VAM • Do not teach ELA/Reading/Math courses • Majority of students in Grades 6-8 • 10 or more have Non-FSA VAM scores
Civics EOC • Assigned Civics EOC Course
FCAT 2.0 Science • Assigned Grade 8 Science course
Algebra 1 EOC (Grade 8) • Assigned Algebra 1 EOC Course • 10 or more Grade 8 students with scores
Geometry EOC • Assigned Geometry EOC course
School VAM • Do not have 10 or more students with scores • More than 1 school assigned, District VAM Score
*Scores may be combined for teachers based on course/grade assignment Based on Survey 2 – 3 match and minimum of 10 students
High School Teacher Student Performance Score Types
Score Type Description
FSA Reading VAM • Teach Grade 9-10 ELA/Reading/Math courses
Non-FSA Reading VAM • Do not teach ELA/Reading/Math courses
Algebra 1 EOC (Grade 9) • Assigned Algebra 1 EOC Course
Algebra 2 EOC • Assigned Algebra 1 EOC Course w 10+ students
Geometry EOC • Assigned Algebra 1 EOC Course
US History EOC • Assigned US History EOC Course
Biology 1 EOC • Assigned Biology 1 EOC course
SAT • None of above course assignments • Teach Grade 11 students only
FCAT 2.0 Reading Retakes • None of the above and • Assigned Intensive Reading Grades 11-12
School VAM • Do not have 10 or more students with scores from any above • More than 1 school assigned, District VAM Score
*Scores may be combined for teachers based on course/grade assignment Based on Survey 2 – 3 match and minimum of 10 students
Next Steps
• Monitor Legislative Actions
• Breeze Presentation Format
• Detailed Level Presentations (EL, MS, HS)
• Review Data with Committees
• Committee Work through Summer for FY2016
top related