fundamentals of financial market regulation principles vs. rules - based regulation
Post on 30-Mar-2015
229 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL MARKET REGULATION
PRINCIPLES VS. RULES - BASED REGULATION
OUTLINE
• Introduction
• Rules-based approach
• Principles-based approach
• Paradoxes
• Résumé
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 2
MOTIVATION
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 3
INTRODUCTION
Rules based regulation:
Based on a set of detailed rules that govern firms’ behavior.
Such rules enable firms to “tick-the-box” to guarantee compliance with law.
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 4
INTRODUCTION
Principles based regulation:
Refers to a broad set of standards that gesture in the direction of certain desired outcomes.
These standards may be accompanied by guidelines about how to achieve the outcomes.
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 5
INTRODUCTION
Reality:
Common law legal regimes are comprised of both principles and rules!
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 6
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 7
THE RULES-BASED APPROACH
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act (US)
• Rules-based structure: Perceived by many as hopelessly “complex”, “murky”, and “harder to understand and harder to follow” than more flexible regimes in other nations
• BUT: According to the U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the rules-based regulation has served the United States very well over the course of its history and is part of the foundation for its prosperity and growth.
7
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APPROACH
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 8
„What principles-based regulation does mean and should mean, is
moving away from prescriptive rules to a higher level of articulation of
what the FSA expects firms to do. In other words, it helps emphasise
that what really matters is not that any particular box has been ticked
but rather that when making decisions, executives know they will be
judged on the consequences – the results of those actions“.
- Hector Sants, the FSA Chief Executive
An example for the difference between rules and principles:
A rule will say:
„Do not drive faster than 90 km/h”
A principle will say:
„Do not drive faster than is reasonable and prudent in all the circumstances”
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 9
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APPROACH
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APROACH
Another example:
American football
vs.
European football
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 10
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APPROACH
The U.K. FSA’s 11 Principles for Businesses:
1. A firm must conduct its business with integrity.
2. A firm must conduct its business with due skill, care, and diligence.
…
6. A firm must pay due regard to the interest of its customers and treat them fairly.
…
11. A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything relating to the firm of which the FSA would reasonably expect notice.
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 11
THE RULES-BASED APPROACH
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 12
Advantages:
• Clarity and certainty
• Transparency for bank managers
• More operational than principles
THE RULES-BASED APPROACH
Disadvantages:
• High compliance costs
• Initiative and innovation depressed
• Excessive litigation
• Capital markets less attractive to investors
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 13
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APPROACH
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 14
Advantages:
• Flexibility and greater freedom for managers
• Productive dialogue between supervisor and supervised
• Scalability
• Robustness
THE PRINCIPLES-BASED APPROACH
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 15
Disadvantages:
• Uncertainty
• Unpredictability
• Supervision and enforcement more challenging
PARADOXES7 paradoxes of principle based legislation:
1. THE INTERPRETIVE PARADOX:
Principles can be general yet precise
2. THE COMMUNICATIVE PARADOX:
Principles can facilitate communication but can also hinder it
3. THE COMPLIANCE PARADOX:
Principles provide scope for flexibility in compliance yet can lead to conservative and/or uniform behaviour by regulated firms
4. THE SUPERVISORY AND ENFORCEMENT PARADOX:
Principles need enforcement to give them credibility but over- enforcemnet can lead to their demise
Source: ”Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation” by Julia BlackLSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 13/2008
PARADOXES
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 17
Source: ”Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation” by Julia BlackLSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 13/2008
5. THE INTERNAL MANAGEMENT PARADOX: PBR can provide flexibility for internal control systems to develop but can overload them
6. THE ETHICAL PARADOX: PBR can facilitate a more ethical approach but it could result in an erosion of ethics
7. THE TRUST PARADOX:PBR can give rise to relationships of trust, mutuality and responsibility but these are the very relationships which have to exist for it to be effective
PARADOXESCASE STUDIES:
• Enron
• Parmalat
• Energy breakdown in California
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 18
RÉSUMÉ
• The rules-based approach ensures clarity and certainty, transparency for bank managers and is more operational than principles.
• On the other hand, it is connected with high compliance costs and excessive litigation. Innovation may be depressed and capital markets less attractive to investors.
• PBR, in its full form, can provide an effective, durable, resilient and goal based regulatory regime, but at the same time its paradoxical nature means that it is vulnerable.
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 19
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
03/02/2012
Kaja Jankowska, Behzod Alimov, Susanne Ipser 20
top related